It's a matter of choosing my battles. I don't make it a point to explain myself to people who willfully misunderstand me. I think there's some instagrammed stock photobullshit that probably has those words in front of it in cursive on a tumblr somewhere...
Um... I'm pretty sure that's exactly what you're doing here. If this is the kind of battle you choose, I'm not sure what ones you don't choose.
Don't emergency vehicles sometimes use this to their advantage to turn an intersection into a 4-way red light so that they can get through? I know I've heard of ambulances and fire trucks having a button that makes all stop lights near them turn red, but I have never tried to verify the truth of the claim.
As a white male, I have zero belief that my opportunities are being limited by these initiatives. I'm not sure what you're afraid of, but I, for one, appreciate the different thought processes and ideas that come from people who *aren't* white males. We are stronger together than we are apart.
Now it doesn't mean it IS a Yeti. It doesn't mean it's even our kind of Yeti.
What d'ya mean? Every Yeti is our kind of Yeti. Perhaps the Higgs Boson just needs to leave giant footprints in the snow.
Without the Higgs Boson, there would be no snow... so doesn't that kind of mean that the snow itself is the "footprint in the snow" of the Higgs Boson?
I have to agree. The comments on these articles is much ado about nothing. This is news for nerds and the nerd response should be followup questions. What did the research show? What does that mean about humans? Did people from different cultures and backgrounds react differently? etc.
The responses we see here are less nerd-like and more political.
Either you misread my question, or I have no idea how I'm supposed to interpret your answer:
If patents only apply to the country they are filed in, how did China file for 2200 patents? Do they really mean that Chinese companies filed for 2200 US patents? Or do they mean Chinese companies filed for 2200 Chinese patents? Samsung is a Korean company, as another comment mentioned, so the lawsuit you mentioned doesn't really make sense.
I have to say that while I agree that the marketing is devious, in practice my bandwidth has always been at least as good as the "up to" amount the companies have promised. I don't defend these companies in general, but the "up to" speeds & marketing is going to be a hard one to argue against if it's not currently a problem.
I think the lack of market competition is a much bigger problem than marketing techniques. Customers can't "vote with their dollars" because their only two realistic options are 1. internet or 2. no internet.
It's not about me or what I support & don't support, it's about finding the best solution to problems. If people would get over this "you vs. me" mentality perhaps we could stop squabbling over these false dichotomies and actually come up with solutions.
So, yes, sometimes it's possible that an entity exists that is so big and important that losing it would harm far more people than its existence harms. Perhaps it *is* OK to keep that entity there, at least until some support is built around it so that the rest of the structure doesn't collapse when you finally do remove it. Recklessness is generally not a good answer to a complicated problem.
Patents are implemented within a country, and then honored (or not honored) by other countries by means of treaties, right? So how has China "filed for" 2200 patents?
Justice in this case might look simple -- take a bunch of money from the companies and give it to the employees that would have earned it (and penalties, of course). The problem is, this affects a bunch of innocent bystanders. These are top stocks in this country. Lots of retirement funds are wrapped up in these stocks. If you penalize the companies the "rightful" amount, you will definitely harm their stocks, which means members of the police retirement fund in Maine (across the country) stand to lose their asses through no fault of their own.
It's easy to throw around ideas of vengeance & justice on these kinds of situations, but the world is a complicated place, and sometimes what appears obvious and "common sense" is actually the most harmful thing you can do.
I don't blame misogyny for girls not getting into programming, because I don't think computer programming is necessarily characterized by social interaction.
I do. Look at the first post on this article for an example. For that matter, look at the first response to that post as well. Immediately, Slashdot readers (who we *used to* expect more from) objectified all of these women. Twice. Before anyone else could make a remotely educated comment.
Honestly, gas goes up more than 12 cents in a day several times a year anyway, so who is even going to notice? If it weren't for the news article, everyone would just mumble about speculators or blame Obama and go on paying the new price anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
Really? Most of us pay much more than 1/8 of our income for the benefit of everyone INCLUDING ourselves anyway. It's called taxes.
Crap... No mod points.
It's a matter of choosing my battles. I don't make it a point to explain myself to people who willfully misunderstand me. I think there's some instagrammed stock photobullshit that probably has those words in front of it in cursive on a tumblr somewhere...
Um... I'm pretty sure that's exactly what you're doing here. If this is the kind of battle you choose, I'm not sure what ones you don't choose.
Don't emergency vehicles sometimes use this to their advantage to turn an intersection into a 4-way red light so that they can get through? I know I've heard of ambulances and fire trucks having a button that makes all stop lights near them turn red, but I have never tried to verify the truth of the claim.
Seconded.
As a white male, I have zero belief that my opportunities are being limited by these initiatives. I'm not sure what you're afraid of, but I, for one, appreciate the different thought processes and ideas that come from people who *aren't* white males. We are stronger together than we are apart.
I don't know that anyone would call the storm troopers "accurate" though...
Not to mention, the Surface Pro 3 line doesn't even fully release until the end of August...
Now it doesn't mean it IS a Yeti. It doesn't mean it's even our kind of Yeti.
What d'ya mean? Every Yeti is our kind of Yeti. Perhaps the Higgs Boson just needs to leave giant footprints in the snow.
Without the Higgs Boson, there would be no snow... so doesn't that kind of mean that the snow itself is the "footprint in the snow" of the Higgs Boson?
I've been googling but can only seem to find artists' renditions. Does anyone have a link to any photos of the fossils?
According to my joke? The ones that are most profitable.
Why not religion ? Stallman makes a decent prophet.
But very little actual profit.
Well then he won't make a very good religion...
Agree. Also .NET MVC is really getting pretty good as a framework.
Stuxnet affected airgapped machines...
I have to agree. The comments on these articles is much ado about nothing. This is news for nerds and the nerd response should be followup questions. What did the research show? What does that mean about humans? Did people from different cultures and backgrounds react differently? etc.
The responses we see here are less nerd-like and more political.
e-Cigarettes, for example.
If your relationships with your friends are solely (or even largely) based on Facebook, you're doing it wrong.
Either you misread my question, or I have no idea how I'm supposed to interpret your answer: If patents only apply to the country they are filed in, how did China file for 2200 patents? Do they really mean that Chinese companies filed for 2200 US patents? Or do they mean Chinese companies filed for 2200 Chinese patents? Samsung is a Korean company, as another comment mentioned, so the lawsuit you mentioned doesn't really make sense.
I have to say that while I agree that the marketing is devious, in practice my bandwidth has always been at least as good as the "up to" amount the companies have promised. I don't defend these companies in general, but the "up to" speeds & marketing is going to be a hard one to argue against if it's not currently a problem.
I think the lack of market competition is a much bigger problem than marketing techniques. Customers can't "vote with their dollars" because their only two realistic options are 1. internet or 2. no internet.
It's not about me or what I support & don't support, it's about finding the best solution to problems. If people would get over this "you vs. me" mentality perhaps we could stop squabbling over these false dichotomies and actually come up with solutions.
So, yes, sometimes it's possible that an entity exists that is so big and important that losing it would harm far more people than its existence harms. Perhaps it *is* OK to keep that entity there, at least until some support is built around it so that the rest of the structure doesn't collapse when you finally do remove it. Recklessness is generally not a good answer to a complicated problem.
Patents are implemented within a country, and then honored (or not honored) by other countries by means of treaties, right? So how has China "filed for" 2200 patents?
Justice in this case might look simple -- take a bunch of money from the companies and give it to the employees that would have earned it (and penalties, of course). The problem is, this affects a bunch of innocent bystanders. These are top stocks in this country. Lots of retirement funds are wrapped up in these stocks. If you penalize the companies the "rightful" amount, you will definitely harm their stocks, which means members of the police retirement fund in Maine (across the country) stand to lose their asses through no fault of their own.
It's easy to throw around ideas of vengeance & justice on these kinds of situations, but the world is a complicated place, and sometimes what appears obvious and "common sense" is actually the most harmful thing you can do.
They want you to believe that...
I do. Look at the first post on this article for an example. For that matter, look at the first response to that post as well. Immediately, Slashdot readers (who we *used to* expect more from) objectified all of these women. Twice. Before anyone else could make a remotely educated comment.
Honestly, gas goes up more than 12 cents in a day several times a year anyway, so who is even going to notice? If it weren't for the news article, everyone would just mumble about speculators or blame Obama and go on paying the new price anyway.