Huh... It's like IFR for driving. Except when you're a pilot, you have to have very specific training before you're allowed to try it. Oh, and there are a lot more obstacles on the ground than there are in the air!
This is described in TFA in the video. They have cameras tracking the driver and analyzing their position so that they can adjust the visuals accordingly. What I want to know is how crazy this looks to the passengers!
If dying in an accident does not scare people to drive safely, getting a speeding ticket wouldn't either.
Um... Maybe we don't drive on the same roads but... it doesn't. People speed every day. I overheard someone at work yesterday say something about how "93 isn't that fast..."
Yes actually I thought the same thing -- that this looks far more useful in maintaining existing code than in creating new code. I can think of many instances where I could have used something like this. Eclipse's "Open Call Hierarchy" is close, and alt+leftarrow in eclipse is also useful in seeing where you've been. However, you generally can't see all the actual code on the screen at the same time, you have to jump back and forth.
I also really like how they used this concept in their debugger. Bravo for being able to keep old data on-screen for reference/comparison later on.
1. How do the results change if the TV has a video game console attached?
1a. What if it's a PS3/XBox vs. a Wii (implying that a Wii takes more physical activity)
2. How do these results compare to a child who has neither a TV nor a computer in his bedroom?
If it was a joke, it wasn't a very good one. People keep saying it was a joke but typically a joke should be somewhat funny and this tweet really wasn't funny at all. I don't feel at all threatened by it, but clearly somebody did.
Only for intensive purposes?
(it's "intents and purposes" But don't worry, even brain surgeons get this one wrong http://kennyliu.com/brainfart/?p=125)
Do you really not recall the googlebombs around "Miserable Failure" or "Weapons of Mass Destruction" or are you just ignoring them because they invalidate your point?
I'm guessing that too much fiber would cause a different issue....
Actually, TFS says they want to
So they specifically *don't* want to make criminals of people for this infraction.
Huh... It's like IFR for driving. Except when you're a pilot, you have to have very specific training before you're allowed to try it. Oh, and there are a lot more obstacles on the ground than there are in the air!
This is described in TFA in the video. They have cameras tracking the driver and analyzing their position so that they can adjust the visuals accordingly. What I want to know is how crazy this looks to the passengers!
How are those rights taken away? Certainly there are consequences for these actions, but that person continues to have the right to speak freely.
A right, if it can be taken away, is not a right. It is a privilege. The constitution does not say anything about the "privilege to bear arms."
A right, if it can be taken away, is not a right. It is a privilege. The constitution does not say anything about the "privilege to bear arms."
Um... Maybe we don't drive on the same roads but... it doesn't. People speed every day. I overheard someone at work yesterday say something about how "93 isn't that fast..."
The highest speed limits around here are 70!
Yes actually I thought the same thing -- that this looks far more useful in maintaining existing code than in creating new code. I can think of many instances where I could have used something like this. Eclipse's "Open Call Hierarchy" is close, and alt+leftarrow in eclipse is also useful in seeing where you've been. However, you generally can't see all the actual code on the screen at the same time, you have to jump back and forth.
I also really like how they used this concept in their debugger. Bravo for being able to keep old data on-screen for reference/comparison later on.
1. How do the results change if the TV has a video game console attached?
1a. What if it's a PS3/XBox vs. a Wii (implying that a Wii takes more physical activity)
2. How do these results compare to a child who has neither a TV nor a computer in his bedroom?
Shouldn't that be:
Are you thinking of gouge by chance? 'Gauge' is a valid spelling (as is 'Gage', but that just doesn't look right).
smashing pumpkins into small piles of putrid debris?
I think this is how I'll start referring to ALL my code reviews ;-)
And it costs as much as a dump truck...
If it was a joke, it wasn't a very good one. People keep saying it was a joke but typically a joke should be somewhat funny and this tweet really wasn't funny at all. I don't feel at all threatened by it, but clearly somebody did.
Only for intensive purposes? (it's "intents and purposes" But don't worry, even brain surgeons get this one wrong http://kennyliu.com/brainfart/?p=125)
-1 Whoosh
Shielded with tin foil?
Seems like this problem would have been solved a hundred years ago...
What are you doing in their bathroom?
"Third Man In" ?
Bravo, wish I had mod points.
Reference?
The Spirit of St. Louis was a TRANS-ATLANTIC flight.
false