I know this is bad etiquette, but 'looking at other aphids' means genome sequencing of other aphid species, which can clarify if the same gene / allele appears in other species' genome.
It would be a very very rare chance by which a highly similar gene / allele mutates and evolves independently in a fungus as well as an aphid.
Is this the very first instance of the noun wikipedia being used as a verb, or is it the very first time I have seen it?
By the way, and movies aside, read The Ancestor's Tale by Richard Dawkins. It has a brilliant explanation of the various evolutionary genetic processes.
The Linux Format article says it can import docx, pptx etc., which means they are Microsoft Office 2007 XML files, and not OOXML, the Published Standard.
It would be "houston, we problem have", to fix the original quote and flawed translation, ijit.
From my travels, I have learnt that most non-native English speakers use broken English, whether they be in India, the US, UK, Far East, or Middle East. The way you treat your own language shows what respect you have for its proper form.
So have I - from IDA Systems! Phone expected to ship today or tomorrow from their side.
The screenshots look good enough - we'll need to see what comes preinstalled and what we have to force in. I use the MotoRokr E6 now, which is good but not open, and lacks an application universe.
I have installed Fedora 8 under dual booting with XP on my office laptop. I could not afford to let the admin view the installation at bootup, so I have installed GRUB on sda3, and so the Windows bootloader is untouched.
I always boot the computer through a Super Grub Disc and choose XP or Fedora as I want. SGD can search for and find the partition where GRUB is installed by itself. It always saves the day.
Existence is self awareness. That which is self aware is all that is real in the universe. Everything else is just junk information, noise. If all self awareness in the universe dies, the universe itself will cease to exist.
Basically the universe only exists because there are self aware beings capable of perceiving it. The only thing real in the universe are the self aware beings. And God is the collective self awareness of the universe, the universal awareness, or universal soul, or universal mind, however you want to think about it. He does not believe in evolution either. what about gravity? if he disbelieves gravity, will it let him go?
and by this you hypothesize that minds somehow are connected, irrespective of time and space differences, and no available clue about how they communicate with each other beyond currently understood means.
I am not qualified in quantum mechanics, so I refrain from commenting on it. It seems your education in philosophy gives you some secret insight into it, which makes you say that observation causes existence, not a change in state of existence.
Try the anthropic principle for a change.
Oh, and just because *you* do not observe something does not mean it cannot exist, for example a parallel universe.
As a vegetarian, I should say this is the sort of thinking that enables non-vegetarians to justify their desire for meat, even when their 'consciousness' raises questions about needless violence.
Slashdot Mirror
I know this is bad etiquette, but 'looking at other aphids' means genome sequencing of other aphid species, which can clarify if the same gene / allele appears in other species' genome.
It would be a very very rare chance by which a highly similar gene / allele mutates and evolves independently in a fungus as well as an aphid.
Is this the very first instance of the noun wikipedia being used as a verb, or is it the very first time I have seen it?
By the way, and movies aside, read The Ancestor's Tale by Richard Dawkins. It has a brilliant explanation of the various evolutionary genetic processes.
By looking at other aphids.
aLp
Search for Extraterrestrial Idiocy. It will work.
The Linux Format article says it can import docx, pptx etc., which means they are Microsoft Office 2007 XML files, and not OOXML, the Published Standard.
Flawed summary.
that's some real sense of humour.
It would be "houston, we problem have", to fix the original quote and flawed translation, ijit.
From my travels, I have learnt that most non-native English speakers use broken English, whether they be in India, the US, UK, Far East, or Middle East. The way you treat your own language shows what respect you have for its proper form.
I don't know about your home country, but I get my CDs downloaded and shipped by Zyxware
http://www.zyxware.com/requestcd
So have I - from IDA Systems! Phone expected to ship today or tomorrow from their side.
The screenshots look good enough - we'll need to see what comes preinstalled and what we have to force in. I use the MotoRokr E6 now, which is good but not open, and lacks an application universe.
When I'm stuck without a screen, I use morse code. There is so much of asciipr0n to browse, I never get enough. Or any.
My sig points to a chatroom where atheists meet.
Investors like Icahn ironically don't give a fuck about ethics. That is why they flock to the likes of Microsoft.
I am glad to find One honest non-vegetarian.
I have installed Fedora 8 under dual booting with XP on my office laptop. I could not afford to let the admin view the installation at bootup, so I have installed GRUB on sda3, and so the Windows bootloader is untouched.
I always boot the computer through a Super Grub Disc and choose XP or Fedora as I want. SGD can search for and find the partition where GRUB is installed by itself. It always saves the day.
I don't need to prove I am healthier than a non-vegetarian who is similarly sedentary. It is obvious.
Don't try to influence people with your nonsense. Everybody here has a mind of their own.
Basically the universe only exists because there are self aware beings capable of perceiving it. The only thing real in the universe are the self aware beings. And God is the collective self awareness of the universe, the universal awareness, or universal soul, or universal mind, however you want to think about it. He does not believe in evolution either. what about gravity? if he disbelieves gravity, will it let him go?
no, he uses the argument that vegetarians hate. that only some beings are the chosen few that should not be eaten.
and by this you hypothesize that minds somehow are connected, irrespective of time and space differences, and no available clue about how they communicate with each other beyond currently understood means.
do they use the Force?
I am not qualified in quantum mechanics, so I refrain from commenting on it. It seems your education in philosophy gives you some secret insight into it, which makes you say that observation causes existence, not a change in state of existence.
Try the anthropic principle for a change.
Oh, and just because *you* do not observe something does not mean it cannot exist, for example a parallel universe.
Will your consciousness cease to exist when you die? If so, should you be worrying about the fate of your kin or your progeny now?
Your proposition no.3 is the smoke and mirror of your argument, the crucial link on which it hinges, and it is the weakest.
Why? Because the conclusion of a regress of your argument seems to point to a creator, and does not therefore reach a conclusion.
You, sir, are a closet theist.
As a vegetarian, I should say this is the sort of thinking that enables non-vegetarians to justify their desire for meat, even when their 'consciousness' raises questions about needless violence.
Chat with some atheists here:
http://smallpophypothesis.net/
The site is a part of the Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion) network. http://richarddawkins.net/
The book itself is a very good read, and is really eye-opening.
Richard Dawkins' website (The God Delusion) http://richarddawkins.net/ also has a chat feature for atheists.
Visit http://smallpophypothesis.net/
You'll need to register. Some mods there are assholes, but otherwise it is OK.
well, one of them is rather dumb, but still:
how about each wikipedia article having a prominent counter of the edits and rollbacks it has received since posting?
how about giving readers the chance to rank the article on, say, three criteria: authenticity, clarity, depth (OK, these were off the top of my head).
would that allow some people to judge whether they should trust the article?