Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice.org 3.0 Is Officially Here

SNate writes "After a grinding three-year development cycle, the OpenOffice.org team has finally squeezed out a new release. New features include support for the controversial Microsoft OOXML file format, multi-page views in Writer, and PDF import via an extension. Linux Format has an overview of the new release, asking the question: is it really worth the 3.0 label?"

284 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Great by rimcrazy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    /. ed already.

    --
    "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
  3. Re:Forbidden by entgod · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not really the summary at fault. Seems like the whole http://www.openoffice.org/ is giving the same response.

  4. As always, KDE leads the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is it really worth the 3.0 label?

    Look, it's simple: 3.0 is not really 3.0, but it should be considered 3.0-developer-alpha-gold. The next release will be 3.2-beta-silver-GTi, followed quickly by 3.1.1.0-gold-gold-always-believe-in-your-soul, which may (or may not) be ready for end users. Provided no show-stopper bugs are found in that (& if they are they'll just be re-classified as "WORKSFORME" and the submitter flamed), the final 3.0.1.45 version will be released to end users (apart from those in Arizona and Ohio. They have to wait for 3.1.5)

    This is so obvious you'd have to be an idiot not to understand it! Duh!

    1. Re:As always, KDE leads the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Ohio, you insensitive clod!

  5. Google Cache of Mirror List by xaoslaad · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main page is ./'ed but it appears the mirrors are still fine. Just use the mirror list in Google Cache.

    http://74.125.113.104/search?q=cache:chsA7FTyP3wJ:distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/+mirrors+openoffice&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

    1. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Jabadia · · Score: 1

      The main page is ./'ed but it appears the mirrors are still fine. Just use the mirror list in Google Cache. http://74.125.113.104/search?q=cache:chsA7FTyP3wJ:distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/+mirrors+openoffice&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

      I dont understand your suggestion, how do i get a link to download the new openoffice ?

    2. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by JustKidding · · Score: 1

      As of April 2008, OpenOffice.org does NOT NEED any NEW mirrors from regions that already have a strong download network. We currently ONLY search for new mirrors in areas where the number of download sites is quite low. As of now, this is especially true for Africa or India.

      No, they don't need any mirrors... I'm rather surprised by the OOXML support; does OpenOffice now support it, even before MS does?

    3. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The mirror list contains a list of download sites; just look at the cached page on Google since openoffice.org is down.

    4. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Informative

      RSS feed of torrents for all platforms:

      http://borft.student.utwente.nl/~mike/oo/bt.rss

    5. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Now that OOXML has an implementation. Could we hope that the Microsoft implementation will be compatible ?
      But my biggest question is how do they have managed to implement all these "do it like Wordperfect 0.9 alpha developper release" ? (Yes I know I am little bit sarcastic here :D)

    6. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A link? Simply do:

      eix-sync && emerge -autv openoffice

      Do you still live in the stone age or what? ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, OpenOffice now supports (presumably a subset of) Office 2007 XML. Office 2007 XML is not the same as OOXML though some of the OOXML documentation could be useful in implementing Office 2007 XML.

    8. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      filehippo.com is also a good bet.

    9. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The main page is ./'ed"

      Why do so many people shorten "Slashdot" to "./" instead of "/."?

    10. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by teeks99 · · Score: 1

      Torrents for US-English versions: http://www.teeks99.com/OOoTorrents/ (Hosted on a separate server that isn't getting stomped on...yet)

    11. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the comment you replied to. their mirrors are still up. it's their web server that is down, and no amount of download mirrors would have prevented this.

    12. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also you can use the selector there:

      http://borft.student.utwente.nl/~mike/oo/index2.html

    13. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do this with me:

      Pronounce "."

      Pronounce "/"

      Pronounce "./"

      Read the name at the top of the screen.

      See if you can figure out what you did wrong.

    14. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by danomac · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that it's masked... if you aren't running an unstable branch, that won't work. ;)

    15. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was before my morning coffee...

    16. Re:Google Cache of Mirror List by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      ;) I'm running "unstable" (~amd64) so I don't have to wait two years before it becomes avaliable while the ebuild still is a piece of crap that kills my emerge.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  6. Re:Forbidden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Content Helm Noodle? Sounds like some kind of off-brand tinfoil hat ...

  7. Re:Forbidden by sammyF70 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think liquidpele just uncovered that Open Office is actually subsidized by the Pastafarian Church.

    --
    "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
  8. Great ... err ... by Selanit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or it will be once the openoffice.org sysadmin fixes their server. Major egg on the face there.

    Anyway, this release has one feature that I've been longing after for years now: proper support for marginal comments.

    While OO.o has long been capable of opening documents with comments in them, the user interface for reading those comments sucked HARD. The presence of a note was indicated by a tiny, light yellow rectangle at the end of the sentence. Easy to miss. And then if you wanted to actually read the comment, you had to hover your mouse over it to trigger a small yellow pop-up box containing the comment text (which would be cut off if it was a long comment). Basically, actually READING a commented document in OO.o was not practical.

    This new version is much, much better. I tried it out using one of the copies that hit the mirrors before the official release, and it's soooo much better. Comments now actually show up in the margins, they've got little lines connecting them to the section of the document they apply to, and they're color coded by author. Hallelujah! Now I can finally quit depending on Word for grading student papers.

    1. Re:Great ... err ... by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

      You don't have permission to access /servlets/ContentHelmNoodle on this server.

      Hmmm. Egg, Noodle. Add some bacon cubes and some HP Original Brown sauce and I'll convert.

      Anybody in the know care to elaborate what a contentHelmNoodle is? Just curious... I love the names developers give things sometimes.

      Yeah, yeah, I know - It's off topic, but kinda interesting.

    2. Re:Great ... err ... by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So as a newbie to this free software; open software paradigm:

      - Can I use OpenOffice to create "Word formatted resumes" and forward them to potential employers? Or is this like when I used GEOSwrite, and nobody could read the file, except another Commodore 64 user?

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    3. Re:Great ... err ... by fabs64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've used OO.o for my resume for a few years now with no issues, but that may be because I try to keep a resume plain and simple.

      Btw, unless word is specifically requested, pdf resume's look a lot nicer.

    4. Re:Great ... err ... by pipatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think GeoWrite existed for Apple-II as well.

      Anyway, yes, you can export them to a Word-compatible format, and since OpenOffice is using a standard file format, MS Word should be able to read it as well. Also, OpenOffice will create smaller and nicer Word-files than Word.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    5. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      export to pdf is your friend : as far as I know most computers are able to open and render PDF in a way or another

    6. Re:Great ... err ... by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      You can use OpenOffice.org to forward documents in [i]PDF[/i] to potential employers. Any potential (IT related) employer that insists on MS Word format for resumes isn't worth the bother.

      However, if you do want to bother, OpenOffice.org can open and save MS Word Document formats since at least MS Word 6.0 (the first version I ever used, and I still have files from that time).

      And, if that doesn't satisfy you, OOo can also open a variety of other "legacy proprietary file formats" 1.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    7. Re:Great ... err ... by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

      No, don't use it to save word docs unless that you can verify they look normal in word first.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    8. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just always used text-boxes and then saved the result to PDF to send to students. As PDFs they become pretty much fixed against student tampering, and no-one can say: "but I did have that uncertainty listed. You just missed it."

      That said, this is an improvement (for collaborative purposes, I'm thinking). Now for those of us who haven't used Word on a daily basis in, oh, 7 or 8 years cause we haven't needed it, will such comments automatically be visible in Word versions 2000+?

    9. Re:Great ... err ... by sveard · · Score: 1

      Or is this like when I used GEOSwrite, and nobody could read the file, except another Commodore 64 user?

      Peter Griffin, is that you??

    10. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting formulas to pdf doesnt always work right. I usually have to submit hw in PS format.

    11. Re:Great ... err ... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Btw, unless word is specifically requested, pdf resume's look a lot nicer.

      Can you explain how PDf resume's look a lot nicer? It's going to look the same as a printed copy which will look the same as the copy in the word processor you are printing it from.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Great ... err ... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd be surprised, windows is about the only os that doesn't have a pdf viewer by default these days.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Great ... err ... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Don't use word to save word docs unless you can verify they look normal in the same version and configuration of word used by whoever you send the files to...

      Version makes a big difference, as to arbitrary configuration options such as your default printer.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Great ... err ... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Multiple views on a document is a big win for me, I've been cursing its absence in OO.o. I hope you can turn the marginal comments off -- I work a lot away from base, using a lightweight laptop, and those margins take up too much screen real-estate on a small screen.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    15. Re:Great ... err ... by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can you explain how PDf resume's look a lot nicer? It's going to look the same as a printed copy which will look the same as the copy in the word processor you are printing it from.

      If the word processor is Microsoft Word, that depends on whether the recipient has a) the same Word version and language (and therefore the same platform) b) the same printer model and c) the necessary fonts.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    16. Re:Great ... err ... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't get reliable and consistent documents from Word...if I print a document to a printer, that same document will look different when sent to another printer. It's damn near impossible for me to do a simple page replacement in a report without finding out who/where the original was printed because the pagination never matches.

      Stick to PDF if you're trying to impress a potential employer.

    17. Re:Great ... err ... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Also, OpenOffice will create smaller and nicer Word-files than Word.

      Not always the case under 2.x, don't know about 3.0. The trick is to keep the formatting simple if you're going to export to Word.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    18. Re:Great ... err ... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If they're using a different version of word, don't have the same fonts, or are using a different view in word, things could look very different.

    19. Re:Great ... err ... by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but you can embed a nice handwritten font so it has that "personal touch" to it.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    20. Re:Great ... err ... by Chutulu · · Score: 1

      if they included one the EU would sue their asses...

    21. Re:Great ... err ... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They really need to be split up into an OS company and an apps company, then the OS company can sell their basic featureless OS to OEMS to bundle together with third party apps to create a usable system.

      Getting an OS that doesn't include basic tools like a pdf viewer is no good for anyone, but neither is being forced to take a half assed app that can't be removed because it comes by default with the os...

      Linux offers a good compromise by having multiple distributions which make different choices, *AND* the fact that all of them let you easily remove and replace the bundled apps if you want.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job CollabNet!

    23. Re:Great ... err ... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      I don't get the joke. What relevance does Peter Griffin have to do with a Commodore 64 running GEOS?

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    24. Re:Great ... err ... by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      I love the E.U.

      I wouldn't want to live there, but I love watching that government bully Microsoft into submission. I think the E.U. will become the new superpower to whom corporations will beg for mercy. :-)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    25. Re:Great ... err ... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      - Can I use OpenOffice to create "Word formatted resumes" and forward them to potential employers? Or is this like when I used GEOSwrite, and nobody could read the file, except another Commodore 64 user?

      In short: yes.

      I am fortunate that I can run Linux at work. I'm a manager of an IT shop for a large university, and I write a lot of docs for what I do. I have my default OpenOffice Writer format set to DOC format, and everything works just fine. I can share my docs with others in my office, and no one is aware that the doc was written with OpenOffice. Formatting is preserved, and especially because I have the Microsoft Fonts installed, everything looks just like MS Word.

      Many of my coworkers have been upgraded the new version of MS Office, so I get a fair number of DOCX files now. I use the ODF converter to read them, and send back a DOC file (no one seems to notice, or care if they do.) But I'm really looking forward to the DOCX compatibility in OpenOffice 3.0!

    26. Re:Great ... err ... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      If I produce a PDF on my machine, there's roughly a 99% chance that it will appear identical on the target machine. PDFs are generally backwards compatible quite far back; Adobe Reader is nearly guaranteed to be in the crapware package with every new PC and PDF readers come standard with OSX (Preview) and most desktop Linux distros. Even then, there are very small PDF readers (Sumatra and Foxit come to mind) that could easily be attached if you didn't want to take the risk.

      Basically, unless the target needs to edit the document, there's no reason to NOT send docs as PDF.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    27. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory, yes. In practice, no.

      OpenOffice files saved as Word don't have very accurate formatting. The page layout is usually garbled. If you, don't have Word yourself, trusting OO to do a 100% job, you can be sending an embarrasing looking document. MacOS X TextEdit, which also claims the ability to save Word files, has the same problem. Sure the text is all there, but the page layout and formatting are usually waaay off. If you don't have a copy of Word, you won't know how bad the file will look on the other end! (And even then, between different versions of word, good luck...)

      PDF is a better choice. Everyone can read it, and What You See Is What You Send. Unless you forget to embed fonts!

      GeoWrite sounds like a better plan. Lets all go back to Apple IIs. :D

    28. Re:Great ... err ... by Redoubts · · Score: 1

      LaTeX

    29. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pdf resume's

      I hope you have someone literate review your resumes, since you clearly are not.

    30. Re:Great ... err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not the content of what was said. the form of the sentence matches the form of the jokes on "family guy":

      "this is like the time that..."

    31. Re:Great ... err ... by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

      I love the E.U. too. I live there. It's a nice place to be. Microsoft isn't just bullied by 'our' government; it's being slammed onto its knees. I think.

  9. PDF by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only thing of any interest, then, is the PDF import/editing/export. Ironic, considering that the ad's on /. for this article seemed to consist mostly of Adobe Acrobat ads...

    But if it really *can* import any PDF, allow basic editing and export, that could really be a boon. Other apps that allow that are either incredibly expensive, horrible to use or just too out-of-date. Does it support "encrypted" PDF's if you have the passwords, etc.? Does it allow image/text editing/extraction from a PDF? If so, then this update would be worth it for that alone.

    The rest is just eye candy and basic bug fixes (e.g. >256 columns in Calc).

    1. Re:PDF by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's an ad?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:PDF by digitalderbs · · Score: 2

      The opposite of irony is not irony. It's logic. You're stating that acrobat PDF ads are not surprising and a logical consequence for an article featuring PDF functionality. I'm only griping about this because the misuse of irony is prevalent in comments.

      (Also, it's 'ads' and PDFs -- plural form, and not possessive form or a conjunction.)

      Indeed, poor word usage and grammar in a posting about an office suite is ironic.

    3. Re:PDF by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's one of those things that used to pop up and ask us to buy stuff before adblocker came out.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:PDF by ozphx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if 'they' insist on Word files, you wouldn't want to work there anyway

      Wrong. It means they are used to paying more than they should for things. Sounds like a great environment for negotiating a starting salary in.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    5. Re:PDF by Ynot_82 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, it can really import PDF's
      tested this out on the RC's (haven't tested the final release yet) and it worked OK
      not great, but OK

      there seemed to be no problem at all loading a simple PDF'd document or spreadsheet
      importing took a little longer than I'd have hoped, but I got a fully editable document, formatting intact

      just for kicks, I loaded the PDF of my motherboard manual into OO.o just to see
      and while I did get editable text, it did not do particularly well on complex formatting
      in particular, changes in page orientation & dimensions threw it, resulting in some pages being malformed

      Just from briefly playing around with it, I've found the following:
      - Importing a PDF'd spreadsheet gets you a tabulated word processing document, with spreadsheet rows & columns made up of drawing lines and text in textboxes

      - sometimes (haven't been able to narrow down what causes it) random spaces are inserted into words
      "Some text" may become "Som e te xt"

      - Borders around objects (textboxes, shapes) are sometimes inconsistent

      - no support for transparent PNG's (alpha channel turns to solid black)

    6. Re:PDF by Zashi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong Wrong Wrong. Sorry. When I was applying for the job I have now I had to send in my resume in word format after initially sending it in PDF format. Big deal. I saved as a .doc file and sent it in. I prefer pdf because I can be sure it'll look right but OO.o usually gets MS doc format right for me.

      As for not wanting to work for a company that insists on MS docs... well. That really only speaks to how HR works. I work for a staffing company that mainly supplies employees for IBM. I'm a tester in IBM's superlab. I get to play with big iron servers: stuff like quad 6-core machines (yeah, 24 cores in a rackmount system). I use linux for my workstation with no problems. I come in and leave when I wish (we report our time via a webapp) and as long as my work is done and I'm here when I say I'm here management has no problems.

      Don't be so quick to judge a company.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    7. Re:PDF by dmbasso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you only look for money, instead of quality of life...

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    8. Re:PDF by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Are IBM bringing out the equivalent version of Star Office soon? - Just wondering....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    9. Re:PDF by domatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But if it really *can* import any PDF, allow basic editing and export, that could really be a boon. Other apps that allow that are either incredibly expensive, horrible to use or just too out-of-date. Does it support "encrypted" PDF's if you have the passwords, etc.? Does it allow image/text editing/extraction from a PDF? If so, then this update would be worth it for that alone.

      It imports into Draw. Short edits to text and filling in forms is simple. If you're wanting to make extensive changes to the formatting and style of the document then it is more difficult but possible. The PDF is treated as a vector image with text layers and objects for graphics and table elements. Upcoming versions of the PDF Import Extension will import into writer which will make extensive edits easier but at the expense of fidelity.

    10. Re:PDF by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong. It means they are used to paying more than they should for things. Sounds like a great environment for negotiating a starting salary in.

      I think you have it wrong. Since the spend too much for software, they save by offering lower salaries. Look elsewhere.

    11. Re:PDF by ozphx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Someone saying "We use Word here, and this is your copy" will reduce your quality of life?

      Or were you planning on using OO3 because its Free? If so, were you planning on working on the code during company time? If so... take your goddamn compiler and GTFO.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    12. Re:PDF by ozphx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Since the spend too much for software, they save by offering lower salaries. Look elsewhere.

      Thats a mighty stupid assumption to be making before the start of negotiations. Send your Word-97-Formatted-Only resume to the appropriate spot, and then check what they offer.

      You can always tell them to stick their offer later. Or tell them your brave new plan to save them money and switch to OO3! (and then the manager says "Sharepoint + 20 Office seats cost us less than the pay I got on the last golf^W vendor day".

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    13. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if 'they' insist on Word files,

      import the PDF as an image into Word, and send that. That'll teach them...

    14. Re:PDF by CaptainPalapa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, with most of the IT/tech jobs being staffed by recruiters, you should be used to providing the resume in Word. They do it so they can strip off all your pertinent contact information for initial presentation to the client. If you only provide it in .pdf format (I know, I've tried), then the headhunter simply won't submit you.

    15. Re:PDF by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes...
      Using word also forces you to use windows (yes i am aware there is a very different and not fully compatible mac version)... So it takes away your freedom to choose your operating platform...

      It also makes it much harder to write standalone scripts to parse the documents, and if you want to use macros (which require the entire runtime bloat of word running) you only have one language you can use, which is going to be deprecated soon (and the mac version has its own incompatible language for macros).

      I can be far more productive in my job with a linux workstation and files in open easily manipulated formats.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    16. Re:PDF by Zashi · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about lotus symphony? I wouldn't bother. I haven't actually tried lotus symphony, but I HAVE to use lotus notes and notes is just terrible. I Can think of so many other solutions (with and without java) that would work better. But IBM paid X million dollars for a groupware software suite and they'll be damned if they don't use it. Frankly, I think something based on google docs and google gears would work MUCH better and have far less problems. But alas, I am but a peon whose opinion relatively worthless.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    17. Re:PDF by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It lets you save password protected pdf files... not tried opening one..
      You need the plugin for pdf editing, i don't think it's part of the default install, but it really should be. Editing works quite well too, providing the pdf files were properly created in the first place (ie they arent just bitmap dumps as created by some very half assed pdf writing tools)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    18. Re:PDF by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      Thats a mighty stupid assumption to be making before the start of negotiations. Send your Word-97-Formatted-Only resume to the appropriate spot, and then check what they offer.

      I was simply pointing out the fallacy of believing that spending too much on software means that they will also spend more on salary. Companies that spend too much on everything don't usually stay in business long.

    19. Re:PDF by miscz · · Score: 1

      Like IBM Lotus Symphony? It's based on very old version of OO.org and it's closed source though.

    20. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure it will not allow editing of PDF files created from graphics...like a JPG file scanned from a manual. Editing should be possible for PDF files created from text or word processor files though.

    21. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like they're mutually exclusive and not directly related.

    22. Re:PDF by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The things that pays for the bandwidth, servers, and salaries of those that run Slashdot.
      I would really like to white list Slashdot but every time I have tried they put up some stupid animated banner.
      Really is too bad since I would bet the ads on Slashdot are for things I may be interested in.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    23. Re:PDF by 0232793 · · Score: 1

      crossover office (http://www.codeweavers.com/) allows you to run Word etc. on Linux; I tried it on MS Office 2007 and it worked flawlessly (although I only tried basic things) ... personally I prefer latex, something that works much better on linux than windows in my experience

    24. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The stuff I look at to pay for your bandwidth, moron.

    25. Re:PDF by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The visual basic editor didn't work last time i tried crossover...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    26. Re:PDF by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      >>>And if 'they' insist on Word files, you wouldn't want to work there anyway, as they are clearly deluded and stupid beyond measure.

      hahahahahahahahaha!

      >>>Not kidding either, actually.

      Oh. :-| Most of my jobs have required either Word or plain text resume. Most of my jobs were government-contractor jobs; a coincidence?

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    27. Re:PDF by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      It's not as easy as that - the rules for submitting resumes are usually made by the HR department, and whether these guys are smart or flexible has only a minor impact on your job. There are some great departments in lousy companies, and vice versa. Besides there are very few jobs out there in companies that don't suck. Realistically you need to find one which sucks not quite so bad.

    28. Re:PDF by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      I've worked at several places that were used to paying more than they should for things. They never seem to apply that philosophy to personnel...

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    29. Re:PDF by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      From my experience those kinds of decisions are made by people who are too powerful or influential to ignore and too ignorant to be convinced by reason, and unless you're at a small startup, those kinds of people exist in every company. They may be irredeemably stupid, but they are everywhere, even in good companies.

      Word has convinced me that not only is _it_ an utter failure as a product, but that WYSIWYG word processing is a complete and utter mistake for almost everything it's used for. WSYIWYG is fine for desktop publishing, but for 99% of what Word is used for, simple markup like reStructured Text, is an order of magnitude easier to learn and use, and saves an incredible amount of time.

      Microsoft has literally nothing constructive to contribute in the word processing world. At this point, they cause more damage than anything constructive they might have ever accomplished (which pretty much ended in the mid 90's). If anyone asks me for a Word document, I would comply using OOo. If someone gives me a Word document, I make it very clear (in a polite way) that Word documents are a huge convenience problem (especially from Word 2007, which breaks compatibility AGAIN) for people who do not have it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    30. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried the quality of life route. You now the company with is one big happy family. This usually means that if quality in your life means working long hours and not taking days off for illness.

      I think I'm ready for the looking for money route.

    31. Re:PDF by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has one ad which manages to crash Safari when you close the page, presumably due to a bug in Flash. I've set my user CSS now to not show the divs containing ads, but I'd happily remove this if they would just not allow flash ads.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    32. Re:PDF by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I've not tried it, but I believe that if you export a PDF from Writer you can embed the ODF in the PDF metadata, so it can be read anywhere and edited anywhere with OpenOffice installed. The Equation Service on OS X used to do a similar trick, where the LaTeX source for an equation was embedded in the PDF, allowing you to turn it back into an editable form later.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    33. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because my software development job involves grepping word and excel documents...

    34. Re:PDF by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      I suppose there are two problems:
      1. I have disabled flash, because the benefits of having it enabled were near zero and flash ads consume a lot of CPU time.
      2. I have blacklisted most of the common advertising services (doubleclick.net, etc.), and so if slashdot is getting its ads delivered by one or more of those services, the ads are not delivered to me.
      --
      Palm trees and 8
    35. Re:PDF by turtleAJ · · Score: 1, Informative

      The rest is just eye candy and basic bug fixes (e.g. >256 columns in Calc).

      Sorry, yet I have to disagree.

      There's one feature that I had been waiting for ever...
      When you zoom out in more than two pages, Writer would just keep ONE column of pages, and make them smaller.

      As opposed, Microsoft's Word would zoom out, and re-organize the pages to fit on-screen (two pages side-by-side, then three, four, etc.)

      This was really... well, there was just a better way (Word's).

      The new Open Office 3.0 has this feature.

      Aside from that, and the >256 columns... the icons are prettier.

      [[Seriously; thanks to everyone that works on Open Office. Thanks!]]

    36. Re:PDF by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      To date, I've yet to see just one place which didn't ask for a .doc (or .txt) after receiving my resume as PDF.

    37. Re:PDF by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get that sand out of your vagina, and allow the ads to be served. It's pathetic how some people get all angry with an animated banner. You seem to understand that adverts are a massive source of income for many websites, yet don't seem to have a problem with using an ad-blocker on those very websites. That's fucked up.

    38. Re:PDF by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Then just blacklist the flash-adds only.
      I just use flashblock to stop all the annoying adds, and then I have adblock without any filters to take down any particularly annoying .gifs

      --
      What?
    39. Re:PDF by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      I had to send in my resume in word format after initially sending it in PDF format. Big deal. I saved as a .doc file and sent it in.

      I agree.

      PDF is a good format. However, I try to avoid formats that require additional software to view. I currently maintain my resume in HTML. It doesn't have PDF's guaranty of looking right. However, it can be read by anyone using default software.

      I've never encountered anywhere that required Word. My current place of employment requests Word, RTF, HTML, or text. Acrobat Reader isn't installed on a lot of the workstations. It's only been the last couple of years that IT started installing it on workstations that deal with the public.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    40. Re:PDF by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      GP: And if 'they' insist on Word files, you wouldn't want to work there anyway

      Wrong. It means they are used to paying more than they should for things. Sounds like a great environment for negotiating a starting salary in.

      Or it means they are used to pirating. Sounds like a bad environment for negotiating a starting salary in.

    41. Re:PDF by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Oh I do understand. But I find the animated ads to be very distracting. It really needs to be a trade off. The site has to serve ads that I do not want to block and I have to give them a chance. I have tried more than once and Slashdot has failed more than once.
      Slashdot is a text medium like a newspaper. The ads need to be static. That is what the human eye is used to in this medium.
      Simple as that serve ads that do not cause me actual discomfort and I will see them.
      I use adblocker not out of joy or spite but because I have to.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    42. Re:PDF by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      All you've shown them so far is that you can't comply with a simple request.

      They'll chalk up your non-compliance to either incompetence or arrogance, and in either case they haven't even seen your resume yet. They have a mountain of other resumes to get to, so they won't lose any sleep over this.

      HR sure doesn't care to go ask IT for the rights to install a new document editor just for your special resume.

    43. Re:PDF by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      Free encyclopedia v2.1, 2014

      An ad was a way to talk about one's economic product or service by the primitive [[humans]] of the 2000s. A surge of ads was a desperate attempt of sellers to avoid a [[depression]] in [[2008]]. It failed as a result of widespread use of [[adblocker]], (citation needed) which was eventually declared illegal just before [[WW3]] against the Russia-China alliance. Then the earth was taken over by [[alien overlords]] who noticed the planet after a group of [[reckless astronomers]] sent a series of self-incriminating messages in the deep space providing the colonising aliens with evidence of the human position and stupidity (and thus easiness of invasion). As a result of the fusion of the two intelligences, adblocker became a historical oddity as the need for ads disappeared with the [[technological singularity of 2013]].

    44. Re:PDF by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      You seem to understand that adverts are a massive source of income for many websites, yet don't seem to have a problem with using an ad-blocker on those very websites. That's fucked up.

      Like the other guy, I refused to deal with the animated ads. I'm distractable enough without them.

      Whenever possible, I subscribe. And I only block the blinky ads, so hopefully people choosing ads for their sites will get the hint and pick things that compliment their content, rather than detracting from it.

    45. Re:PDF by domatic · · Score: 1

      That is a separate feature from being able to import PDFs into Draw. Still, that is handy in that anybody with a PDF reader can read those PDFs and anybody with OOO can edit it as well. It's my understanding that this can be done with Calc as well?

    46. Re:PDF by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Damn, I have mod points and I wanted to award some to you but /. won't let me mod a post Insightful/Flaimbait/Funny

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    47. Re:PDF by drfireman · · Score: 1

      I think the point was that PDF ads make for a surprising juxtaposition, given that the most interesting content of the story is a feature that runs counter to the commercial purpose of the ads. The ads promote Adobe, the article is a stake in Adobe's heart (sort of). Maybe not a textbook example of irony, but certainly not its opposite. Then again, I have the ads blocked -- if they were along the lines of "Adobe congratulates OpenOffice" then you're right.

      Either way, I can't believe people are devoting energy to arguing about version numbers. As an OpenOffice user, I'm glad for the new features, I still want more, and I'd feel no differently if they called it version 2.8, version 6, or whatever.

    48. Re:PDF by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Try Inkscape, it does an awesome job importing PDFs. Preserves all the graphics and everything, though it can only load one page at a time.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    49. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get to play with big iron servers: stuff like quad 6-core machines (yeah, 24 cores in a rackmount system).

      Sun's T5440 gives you 4 8-core processors (32 cores in 4 rack spaces) with 8 hardware-supported contexts per core, pretty decent floating-point performance now that the Niagara 2 has one FPU per core, and positively ungodly networking support.

    50. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'they' are the recruiters who want to take out your contact details so that the company will not be able to contact you directly.

      A PDF is pretty useless to them, no matter how lovely and crisp the font is.

      Whether you should work for companies that use recruiters is a different matter...

    51. Re:PDF by kklein · · Score: 1

      Every time I have tried sending a CV as PDF, I've had a whiny call back from a pissed HR person. They don't want them. They want Word so they can search the text.

      Actually, I used to have my name and address in the header of my CV, where it makes sense, but I got a call from the first company I sent it to where the guy said, "I can barely read your name; why did you do it in gray? Are you stupid? You know, you usually want people to BE ABLE TO READ YOUR NAME when you send them a CV! How could I hire someone who doesn't even realize that?" If that happened now, I think I would have said, "Okay, asshole, since we both know I'm not going to even be considered for this job, let me point this out: The fact that it is gray is proof that I know what a header is and what it is for. The fact that you think I did it in a gray font is proof that you're a fucking moron who should be cleaning urinals, not in charge of hiring people. Fuck off."

      Wow, that rage has been floating around in there for 7 years... I feel much better now.

      Ever since then, when they want a Word copy (which is always), I laboriously copy/paste the header on every page and adjust the text to fit. It's insane.

      Don't confuse HR people. They just aren't that bright to begin with.

    52. Re:PDF by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      With the sand in this case being the advertisements, why don't you?

    53. Re:PDF by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I hear you. I don't WANT to block ads on sites I enjoy, like Slashdot, but they pretty much force me to.

      I CAN'T STAND any type of animation or movement on the screen while I am trying to read. If they just used static, non-changing, non-animated ad's, it would be no problem.

      You know what? Most people that HATE ads, hate them primarily for the same reason- the animation. They can be annoying in many other ways, too (wasted bandwidth, too large, intrusive, etc), but the animation is probably the #1 reason.

    54. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, tell us a little bit about yourself...

    55. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same IBM that says use this OS and Driver with our SAN and it'll "just work" then cause tons of issues after they force a firmware upgrade on you (which causes the SAN to not come up at all after waiting for the 8hrs to rebuild the raid array) to support the SAN falling over on itself weekly? Did I mention them forcing me to wait another 24 hrs to get someone that knew anything about the equipment on the line that could help figure out why?

    56. Re:PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word docs carry versioning info around with them. submit your resume as a word doc and the company can see your previous edits. not a good idea. always go with PDF.

      modifying "guided an intern" to "project management experience" should be a private edit :)

    57. Re:PDF by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about lotus symphony [lotus.com]?
      No, I was in a hurry. I should have said 'Star Office'.
      I've used it (it is OO in disguise), but found it a hassle to keep updating it. IBM sucks badly at Star Office updates.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    58. Re:PDF by ledow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not what people want. I get asked endlessly by differnet people in different places for a program which can take in a hundred-page PDF and, for example, change just one word, correct one spelling mistake, etc. Most of the time it's nigh-on impossible to do in a non-technical way when PDF is really no worse a format than a Word document or a Powerpoint presentation. The only real product that can do it reliably is Adobe Acrobat itself, which is prohibitively expensive for such small changes.

      All I want is a program that can take a PDF, change parts of the text, and not have the formatting go to hell. I want "lossless" editing where the PDF I export is identical in quality to the PDF I imported. Inkscape can't do that. OpenOffice's filters look like they can. If they can do that, Adobe will lose an awful lot of money very quickly. There are shareware apps that claim to be able to do it but they inevitably screw even the simplest of documents up.

    59. Re:PDF by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, lists of requirements, notices that should be displayed in the program, diagrams, text strings, even graphical elements and all kinds of other shit are sent to developers in ridiculous formats like that...
      Many of those things would make a lot more sense to extract programatically, especially when management keeps changing their minds.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    60. Re:PDF by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. How can you work in anything other than a dark room, reading braille, if a flash advert (which isn't even on the page once you scroll down a couple of inches) distracts you so much you can't read? I'd love to believe your story, but it just sounds like a bullshit excuse for your stealing bandwidth from a site you spend considerable time reading.

    61. Re:PDF by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Try to make sense next time you attempt to deliver a pithy one-liner. You might actually succeed.

  10. Its useful to update version numbers... by ashraya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have not RTFM. Nor the link. In true /. spirit, Let me state this - A new version number is sometimes needed for other reasons than adding more features. At work I use Office 2007 from MS. Of the five systems at home, all but one use a flavour of linux with Ooo 2.x (mostly Ubuntu, but have an OLPC too). I recently decided to work on a work doc from home, but only when I wanted to open it, I realized it was docx format. I had almost given up - Ooo 2.x came before the 2007, so I did not expect support. But some desparate googling brought me to a filter that I could add, and lo presto, I could use the doc in Ooo! I had honestly not expected the functionality in Ooo 2.x! I had given up based on version numbering and release dates, and most would too. A newer version number might prompt more of us to try harder. It helps! Ashraya

    1. Re:Its useful to update version numbers... by lagfest · · Score: 1

      Yes, for instance the subversion project increments the major version number to indicate a break in backwards compatibility.

      Get the new Subversion 2.0! it breaks stuff.

      Obviously they never had the guts to actually do so :)

    2. Re:Its useful to update version numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why off-topic has he is on-topic? Has he express his opinion on the numbering of this new version with an anecdote. Continuing on the question of "Linux Format" about if the version can or can't be a 3.0...

  11. OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How could they possibly implement OOXML support in OpenOffice? We've been hearing over and over how the OOXML spec is so convoluted and ill-specified that it is impossible for anyone but Microsoft to implement!

    1. Re:OOXML by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

      It's a MS technology, so likely it'll soon become an imposed standard. ActiveX anyone??

    2. Re:OOXML by waferhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "How could they possibly implement OOXML support in OpenOffice? We've been hearing over and over how the OOXML spec is so convoluted and ill-specified that it is impossible for anyone but Microsoft to implement!"

      I know you're a troll, but I'll bite back...

      This may be be the first actual OOXML IMPLEMENTATION in a release version of ANY office suite... ;-)

    3. Re:OOXML by jcupitt65 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A basic level of OOXML support is pretty easy (you can base something off the existing .doc importers), a complete implementation is very, very hard.

      People say that it's a bogus standard because no one but Microsoft can really ever claim to have 100% compatibility.

    4. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Microsoft isn't even compatible...

    5. Re:OOXML by Clueless+Nick · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Linux Format article says it can import docx, pptx etc., which means they are Microsoft Office 2007 XML files, and not OOXML, the Published Standard.

      Flawed summary.

      --
      Chat with other atheists http://secularchat.org
    6. Re:OOXML by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      People say that it's a bogus standard because no one but Microsoft can really ever claim to have 100% compatibility.

      The W3C's been churning out bogus standards for years then :P

    7. Re:OOXML by jazzduck · · Score: 1

      No, with W3C standards the reverse is true. No one but Microsoft can ever claim to be 100% INCOMPATIBLE with them. (As a web app developer, I frequently wish to burn the IE 6 and IE 7 development teams alive.)

      --
      A cat is no trade for integrity!
    8. Re:OOXML by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The W3C's been churning out bogus standards for years then :P

      Those standards are implementable (and where they aren't, they get fixed.) It's just a matter of man-hours.

      You can't implement stuff like "Space like Word 6" because it doesn't describe what Word 6 does. Man-hours don't help.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    9. Re:OOXML by SEMW · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Linux Format article says it can import docx, pptx etc., which means they are Microsoft Office 2007 XML files, and not OOXML, the Published Standard.

      Office 2007 OOXML files *are* a published standard -- the published standard in question being ECMA 376.

      If what you actually meant was "...not OOXML, the Published ISO Standard", then say what you mean. But your original comment could be understood as saying that the spec Office 2007 uses is unpublished, wihch is obviously wrong.

      (Not to mention that even saying that is ambiguous -- does "The ISO standard" refer to ISO 29500/Transitional or ISO 29500/Strict? The former is practically identical to ECMA 376, with the exception of minor tag semantic cleanup; whereas the latter is significantly different).

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    10. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it will read those good ol' docx and pptx files. The problem is rendering them properly ;-) It still falls far below the bar on that feature. I've given up on OO for any office 2007 format.

    11. Re:OOXML by the_denman · · Score: 1

      can import but can't export :-( I want to be cool and send all my friends docx files that they can't open on the cheep

    12. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it can import, but it cannot save - at least I don't see an option to save as docx.

    13. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think even Microsoft implemented it to 100% compatibility...

    14. Re:OOXML by online-shopper · · Score: 1

      Then I submit you're doing something wrong. I'm working on a largish project where I work(web application for configuring routers). We've found that 90% of what we do works with firefox >2, ie >=6, opera, and konqueror. knock out ie6 and we're closer to 98%
      We're doing SOAP in javascript on the browser, almost pure CSS layout, no tables, but some container games.

    15. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux Format article says it can import docx, pptx etc., which means they are Microsoft Office 2007 XML files, and not OOXML, the Published "Standard"

      fixed that for you

    16. Re:OOXML by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I heard that even Microsoft failed to implement it properly.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    17. Re:OOXML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on experience I'd say that it's impossible for Microsoft to implement (while retaining enough incompatibilities with their previous products and formats to satisfy some arbitrary business requirements.)

      The real difference between Microsoft and OpenOffice.org (for example) is that the latter is genuinely committed to actual standards and interoperability. Not that OOXML is an actual standard, mind you - the OOXML support stems from the latter part - interoperability.

      What Microsoft is doing, I don't know. And to be perfectly clear: Neither do I care. The only thing I want Microsoft to do is to play fair and follow (actual) rules. So far, they fail miserably on both accounts, time and again.

      To sum up: Seeing read-only support for OOXML in OpenOffice.org before even Microsoft themselves manages the same thing is no surprise to me.

      What was your point, again?

  12. I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a few days 3.01, 3.02 and 3.03 will be coming out, so I'll wait for those fixes to come out before I put down my hard-earned money

    1. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by pagaboy · · Score: 1

      Hope you get a nice cheap deal!

    2. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      I know that your money go 'POOOF' with the financial crisis. But is $0 too much for you that you must ask for a budget line, having the autorisation of the financial authority before contracting a negotiation with an http/ftp server to buy the product ?

    3. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You jest, but $0 here, $0 there might start to add up. Sure it's not much money to some, but unlike many other computer users I already spent $0 on my operating system, $0 on my DVR software, and $0 on nearly every application I run. Now OOo is asking for yet another $0 just to run their little "Office suite".

    4. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Ok, I must admit that could add in the end :D

    5. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're the reason the economy is tanking! You must consume and spend lots of money! All this irresponsible zero expenditures are the cause of all our woes! Oh I'm sure the overspending by Congress plays a small role, but you are just plain EVIL!!!

    6. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by kamochan · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between 3.01 and 3.1? A big, fat zero?

    7. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by dmbasso · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to moderate you "+2 Insightful+Funny" :)

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    8. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Yeah, funny, all that jazz. But there's more than an element of truth to your jesting. The reality is that if we ever actually tried to get out of debt, it would destroy our economy and not for the reasons that seem obvious.

      Nowadays, most money exists only because of debt, and the nature of debt is such that you can never pay it all off because of interest. Watch the video link above...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    9. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Javarrito · · Score: 1

      In a few days 3.01, 3.02 and 3.03 will be coming out

      Yeah, I think I'll wait for ContentHelmNoodle v3.03 too.

    10. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Gax · · Score: 1

      I know that you're joking, but there is the cost of your time to consider. If you are using it in a work environment the time required to install the base installation, followed by updates every few weeks can add up to a significant amount.

    11. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apparently your time isn't worth anything. For me it takes time to have to recompile my kernel so I can upgrade from 3.00 to 3.01 while still maintaining Wireless support. I'd hate to have to recompile again when 3.02 comes out to maintain bluetooth, which is why I'm going to wait on this one.

    12. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which just means less time spent browsing /., joke sites, and other wastes of time when you could be doing something productive like installing a free, opensource office suite.

      The whole "I'm at work, every single second of my time is precious" makes me laugh every time, since I am well aware of how "precious" time is at work. And if you are busy every second of your job, you need to find better employment.

    13. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently your time isn't worth anything. For me it takes time to have to recompile my kernel so I can upgrade from 3.00 to 3.01 while still maintaining Wireless support. I'd hate to have to recompile again when 3.02 comes out to maintain bluetooth, which is why I'm going to wait on this one.

      stop using gentoo

    14. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by thefekete · · Score: 1

      0 + 0 + 0 + ... = $$$
      (for large values of "0")

      --
      The cool things is to have windows that bounce up and down like a good tits.
    15. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by danomac · · Score: 1

      But is $0 too much for you that you must ask for a budget line, having the autorisation of the financial authority before contracting a negotiation with an http/ftp server to buy the product ?

      You'd be surprised what bandwidth costs in some countries... or the speed in some... (who wants to download 200MB over a 56k modem?)

      I'm glad I don't live in one of them.

    16. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Apparently your time isn't worth anything. For me it takes time to have to recompile my kernel so I can upgrade from 3.00 to 3.01 while still maintaining Wireless support. I'd hate to have to recompile again when 3.02 comes out to maintain bluetooth, which is why I'm going to wait on this one.

      Why would you need to recompile your kernel for a office suite?

      Gentoo wouldn't even require you to do that.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    17. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't have a 56k modem, but my bandwidth cost me; I am capped to 20GB/month. Consumed over 2 weeks. Then 5 Euro for 5 GB over that.
      In an old age I have done my part of 50MB over a 56k, fortunatly I was not in an hurry at this time :D

    18. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      If the release you use is good and no bug show up, why 'upgrade' it every week.

      For example I have 'just' (in February) upgraded GIMP from 2.2.13 (2006-08-24) to 2.4.5 (2008-02-29) for the Python scripting module and to be on the same version level with my Ubuntu box.

      I have countless of other open source frequently 'upgraded' that last for ages on my computers as is without the constant urge to 'upgrade'.

      The only machine that upgrade continuously is my Ubuntu box and I don't do anything for it and doesn't take me any time that just accepting the proposed updates like windows updates does.

    19. Re:I'll wait a few days for fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's not much money to some, but unlike many other computer users I already spent $0 on my operating system, $0 on my DVR software, and $0 on nearly every application I run.

      So you're the reason the $0 bill dispenser cassette is out or not fully inserted?!

  13. Best feature for me? by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Best feature for me? New support for viewing a document as two pages side by side on the screen.

    That alone for me is worth the upgrade for me, as I can now see two full size A4 pages on my monitor at home whilst typing. Thanks guys! that was a major annoyance with me.

    OOXML *is* controversial and I expect a flame war - but they have read-only and I suspect it is a justified inclusion simply to keep abreast of current MS Office and help encourage adoption. I predict MS will be coming out with lots of new versions of this format, so lets see them keep pace....

    1. Re:Best feature for me? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ah OOXML support - So now even though I have licences for 4 different versions of MS Office I can now only read the documents people send me, by using a free program..... don't you just love Microsoft ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Best feature for me? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hell, .docx can't be opened by half of a typical office staff now, even sans OOo (you know, where the execs and wannabes thereof rush out and get/requisition MS Office 2k7, but the rest of the office gets by on Office 2k3? Yep - I know there's patches for it, but apparently MSFT hadn't bothered to push it via Windows Update... I think they're kinda torn between wanting to sell 2k7 licenses and trying to push the format.)

      Even now, any document that you want to send outside of the company or for others' use, you send in "Office 97-2003" (plain ol' .doc) just to make sure the recipient has at least some hope of reading the thing... I just do PDF; makes it easier all around.

      To be honest, read-only of the .docx format is all that OOo actually needs. Then if you get a file ending in .docx, you send back the changes in PDF, then watch as the recipient gets all red-faced and demands to know why you did that (evil grin).

      Methinks it'll come to a head sooner or later.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Best feature for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      even though I have licences for 4 different versions of MS Office I can now only read the documents people send me, by using a free program

      This might be more down to your own lack of knowledge than any failing of Microsoft.

    4. Re:Best feature for me? by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 1

      Yep - I know there's patches for it, but apparently MSFT hadn't bothered to push it via Windows Update... I think they're kinda torn between wanting to sell 2k7 licenses and trying to push the format.)

      Actually Office 2003 will give you an explanation prompt and the URL to download the format convertors from when you try to open an Office 2007 document.

    5. Re:Best feature for me? by EvilRyry · · Score: 1

      Which is why Microsoft has that free addon for MS office 2000+ that allows you to read and write MSOOXML. And no, I really do hate Microsoft.

    6. Re:Best feature for me? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, But maybe Microsoft should go into advertising .... when I learn about an update, not from Microsoft Update, not from and automatic update, or even Office but from /. ..... .. Now I will have to lie when I tell people "I can't open it can you resend it in the old format" ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    7. Re:Best feature for me? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      How old is your Office copy that the converter doesn't work? It goes back all the way to Office 2000, you can't fault Microsoft for writing the converter plug-in "only" for 7-year-old versions.

    8. Re:Best feature for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Side by side view has been an option of MS Office for 8 years now. Open Source Innovation!

    9. Re:Best feature for me? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      You could do that before. It was called "window->new window". Granted, it wasn't quite the same, but I used the feature all the time with no problems.

  14. Pre-Slashdotted by KingSkippus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it was down before Slashdot posted the story. I tried to access it a couple of hours ago, and it was down then. (Albeit without the ContentHelmNoodle error.)

    Check your local friendly mirror. ;-)

    1. Re:Pre-Slashdotted by whatUrunning.com · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It has been getting hammered for the last 5-6 hours, there is plenty of interest in it so far.

    2. Re:Pre-Slashdotted by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Funny

      THATSWHATSHESAID!

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    3. Re:Pre-Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what's he's aid?

  15. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The list of mirrors was already up somewhere. I've been using this stuff for a week. ;p

  16. Faster loading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they addressed the painfully slow loading times? That is the biggest problem with OOo from my point of view.

    1. Re:Faster loading? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      It's because you haven't configured your memory settings in OOo correctly otherwise it'd load almost instantly.

    2. Re:Faster loading? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I think he is probably referring to the time to load a large complex writer document, which though it was a lot faster in the 2.x releases than 1.x is still slower than word.

    3. Re:Faster loading? by ozphx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like the default settings suck.

      Its a fucking word processor - you shouldn't have to nergle your snerds correctly to get it working.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    4. Re:Faster loading? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      You're right, OOo should release two versions, one for old computers and one for newer computers.

    5. Re:Faster loading? by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Or possibly it should configure its own damn settings, and not try to do something retarded when theres memory pressure...

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  17. Johnny Walker by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should just kill the minor versioning altogether and move to a "red label"/"black label" system.

    1. Re:Johnny Walker by deniable · · Score: 1

      Always bet on black?

  18. NO ! It's a miracle ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Despite your atheist propaganda, you cannot deny that we whitnessing a miragulous miracle of HIs widsom and glory in full extend.

    HIs noodle appendages haveth thouched the server and thus it displays his words to enlighten the unbelievers.

    Behold the word: "ContentHelmNoodle"

    In this time of unrest and crisis his tells us to trust in his tomatoe sauce and that we will be protected by his mercy and meatballs.

    1. Re:NO ! It's a miracle ! by MindKata · · Score: 1, Funny

      Despite your noodley Pastafarianism propaganda, you cannot deny the miragulous miracle of Natural Selection Soap, which cleans the shallow end of the gene pool, spotless of your tomatoe sauced up followers.

      Behold the word: "Soap"

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:NO ! It's a miracle ! by hcgpragt · · Score: 1

      I'll have what he had...

  19. Native Aqua support by pbulteel73 · · Score: 1

    Finally! I can now recommend it to all my Mac friends.

    -P

    1. Re:Native Aqua support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really looking forward to trying this out, as I've been using NeoOffice on my Mac until now. It'd be nice to go back to the "official" OpenOffice instead. Not for any technical reason really, as NeoOffice quite simply "just works", but more for the warm fuzzy feeling of using OpenOffice proper.

    2. Re:Native Aqua support by Teilo · · Score: 1

      I've been using the betas of 3.0 on my Mac for a while now. I invariably have switched back to NeoOffice. I will still likely stay away from the official build, because there are too many things still broken, most notably fonts.

      I tend to use a number of large OpenType font families, such as Warnock or Minion. For whatever reason, OOo 3.0 has serious trouble with them. It gets the styles mixed up constantly. Regular comes out as Italic. NeoOffice just plain works and does not have these issues. (Yes, I filed a bug.)

      Patrick has put so much work into making NeoOffice work like a Mac application should — work with which the official build will likely never catch up. Windows behave as expected. Tool windows look like tool windows, not document windows. Command-~ switching works properly. The regular File, Edit, Tools, etc. menus are still there even when no documents are open. (In OOo, the Recent Documents menu goes away once you close all open documents.) Printing and fonts are far more integrated. The native Mac Media Browser is integrated. Leopard grammar checker support is integrated. To top it all off, the screen drawing code in NeoOffice has been reimplemented as native Mac code instead of hacked into place. As a result the windows and documents redraw several times faster than OOo. In fact, almost everything is faster in NeoOffice than in OOo. Add this to the fact that NeoOffice has backported the MS Office 2007 filters, and VBA support, and I really have no compelling reason to switch.

      And, work on NeoOffice 3.0 is well under way.

      I tell you, the people over at Sun who shun Patrick and his work are cutting off their nose to spite their face.

      --
      Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
  20. PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send your resume as PDF. As long as even different Word versions can't open other Word files correctly there is no hope formatting will be preserved.

    And if 'they' insist on Word files, you wouldn't want to work there anyway, as they are clearly deluded and stupid beyond measure.

    Not kidding either, actually.

  21. Re:Forbidden by nmg196 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ContentHelmNoodle?! WTF?

    The next thing we'll be serving our pages with ParkingBrakeTurboAubergines.

  22. Hardly Impressive by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1, Funny

    I "squeeze out a new release" several times a day. From different repositories, too.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:Hardly Impressive by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but you don't make it publicly available via http, ftp and torrent.

    2. Re:Hardly Impressive by mrpacmanjel · · Score: 0

      .."squeeze out a new release...several times a day.."

      Wow, maybe you should see a doctor!

      Ohhhh, you meant software...sorry.

      Mind you Microsoft have .."squeezed out" a few releases (it would explain a lot!)

  23. Writer by motang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well I only use the Writer for majority of the time and I really welcome all the nifty changes that are in place. Good thing it is finally released, so when will the Linux distributions start to update OO 2.x to 00 3.0?

    1. Re:Writer by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on the dates of their next releases, I would think. Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) might have a fighting chance to have it included in its release at the end of October, there are already testing previews (ppa's). But then, 8.10 is an in-between release that does not promise maximum correctness, so they can afford to take some risks.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    2. Re:Writer by Koohoolinn · · Score: 1

      Mandriva 2009, which was released last week, already includes a very late release candidate and then will soon provide the update to the final release. Source

      --
      Deze sig is in 't Nederlands geschreven.
    3. Re:Writer by markdavis · · Score: 1

      If you load Mandriva 2009.0, it is *already* included. (Although technically it is the final RC with patches. Sometimes they do that... a tiny bit risky, but better than releasing and then a few days later... wham).

  24. Torrent link by snarfies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Openoffice.org has been KO'd. Here's where you can snag a torrent file though:

    http://borft.student.utwente.nl/~adrian/bt.php

    1. Re:Torrent link by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Wonder if it's a ploy to save on bandwidth costs.

  25. Startup time seems fixed by davide+marney · · Score: 3, Informative

    On a stock Dell low-end Dimension C521 running Vista Business, Open Office Writer loads in 9 seconds the first time, and in 1 second thereafter. Not really an issue anymore. Most of my apps take 5-10 seconds to start on this box.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  26. Is it worth getting instead of Office? by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

    I work for a company that buys me MS Office. Given that I am out $0.00 for either OO or MSO, is it worth giving this a try?

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
    1. Re:Is it worth getting instead of Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop asking slashdot and just download and install it yourself. The time it takes to install it is the time it took for you to write that and the time it takes for you to reply to this.

    2. Re:Is it worth getting instead of Office? by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      There is no reason not to have both installed—they don't step on each other's toes. A great reason to have OOo installed alongside MS Office is to be able to work with OpenDocument file formats.

    3. Re:Is it worth getting instead of Office? by ozphx · · Score: 1

      I think considering he does this thing we professionals like to call "work" for a type of entity we refer to as a "company" that his time is probably too valuable to be able to try out a clone of office to see if it works ok for a long term use.

      Not wanting to say your time is worthless, and you are a penniless hippy or anything...

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    4. Re:Is it worth getting instead of Office? by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      Good point; thanks.

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  27. Re:fp! by gary_7vn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You obviously don't know anything about the 60's. At the time, people under 40 mostly supported the Weathermen, because they knew then that their government did not represent them and was in the employ of the military industrial complex. And he was not a "terrorist" -- he was a revolutionary. There is a difference. Washington was a revolutionary. The difference between them is that Washington won. As for your analysis as proof. Are your really that stupid? Yes, yes, you are.

  28. Best Feature? Improved Mac support. by mathx314 · · Score: 0

    I didn't RTFA (the Linux one) on account of being slashdotted, but I'd presume based on the summary that they don't think 3.0 is a big leap forward. I'm not surprised, since they're not on Mac. As a recent Mac convert, I was incredibly disappointed that OO.o, my favorite office suite, was very bad on this OS for version 2.x, on account of running in a very slow and ugly X11 window. The new version runs locally, meaning that I can finally return to using the suite I know and love.

  29. Re:Forbidden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like OpenOffice already is.

  30. Still Has The 6.5-Year-Old Lethal Bug? by occamboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I registered a bug with OO 6.5 years ago, still unfixed, that causes spreadsheets to give utterly wrong results in even the simplest calculations. Sometimes OO treats a number as a string, and assigns it a value of "0" in calculations, e.g., 1+1 could equal 0 or 1.

    Either OO should throw an error "can't treat a string as a number" or it should guess the number of the string is a valid number. But a major undetectable error like this is murderous, as has been testified to by the folks reporting the same bug after I did.

    (Note the OO bug tracker seems to be having problems at this moment, so the link doesn't work.)

    1. Re:Still Has The 6.5-Year-Old Lethal Bug? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sometimes OO treats a number as a string

      Um, when? In OOo 2.x, when you input a string like "'1" into a cell or "a1", it's clearly a string (shows a character in the cell other than a number) and it will treat it as 0. Even if you hit F2 to edit the cell and replace it with just a '1' it will automatically convert that cell value to a number.

      IMHO, this is superior to the behavior in Excel 200x, for instance, where it will let you put in "'1", which will enter a string value of "1" as a string, and then ends up treating the result as a number! Oh, sure, it gives you that little 'warning sign' that says that the cell is a string, not a number, but treating a string as a number like that is just ... wrong.

    2. Re:Still Has The 6.5-Year-Old Lethal Bug? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, ok, found it in Google's cache. This must be you:

      In the business world, spreadsheets are designed in Excel. They are tested in Excel. Then they are distributed to the sales force, who fills them out - in Excel. The spreadsheet designers put strings into formulas - it's rarely the end user who accidentally adds quotes when entering values.

      And any idiot spreadsheet designer who's putting a string value into a formula designed to take a number is doing it wrong. Just because Excel silently accepts the string and then turns it into a number value -- it's like I said in my above post ^^^^, Excel is treating a string as a number. That's more wrong than treating the string as a 0 value.

    3. Re:Still Has The 6.5-Year-Old Lethal Bug? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Excel is treating a string as a number. That's more wrong than treating the string as a 0 value.

      If it's good enough for Perl (and Rexx, and many other scripting languages), why is it bad for Excel? At least it gives an answer that is likely to be what the user expects, while treating "123" as 0 is certainly very unlikely to be that in any case I can think of.

    4. Re:Still Has The 6.5-Year-Old Lethal Bug? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      "123" should be treated as NaN or 123, but NOT 0. Holy Crap, OO.org 2.3 has this bug.

      Casting any string to 0 is just wrong. Either use a smart casting that fails if the string isn't all numericals, or treat it as a "calculations will fail if they try to use this" value.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  31. Re:Why do .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they're lysdexic.

  32. It can't handle .docx on ubuntu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed this on a hardy heron using the .deb packages. Then I asked to a friend to send me a .docx file in order to check the .docx usability. She send me this 15.9kb file http://rapidshare.com/files/153511617/diagramas_4.docx.html and this is how it looks like on Ubuntu http://img206.imageshack.us/my.php?image=captureig5.jpg to be honest I feel a little disappointed since the .docx support was the most waited feature on this release and it don't work on linux. but it works on mac http://img406.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture1ln8.png

    Less bad this is still a beta... wait a minute.

    1. Re:It can't handle .docx on ubuntu. by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Did you try opening it with the Open Office you already had installed? Because 2.4, last I checked, can read docx under Ubuntu. I've only ever used this feature once, but it worked fine.

    2. Re:It can't handle .docx on ubuntu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am trying the 3.0

  33. The Squeeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After a grinding three-year development cycle, the OpenOffice.org team has finally squeezed out a new release.

    Maybe they should have just eaten a lot of prunes.

    1. Re:The Squeeze by collinstocks · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points...

  34. Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you talking about lotus symphony? I wouldn't bother. I haven't actually tried lotus symphony, but I HAVE to use lotus notes and notes is just terrible.

    Dude, Symphony might suck giant donkey balls, or make users so happy they crap rainbows, but either way, since you haven't even tried it, of course your opinion is "relatively worthless" -- I'd even go so far as to say "completely worthless". Sheesh. At least try it out before slagging it.

    (And no, I don't care about Symphony one way or the other -- something about this "I've never used it but I'm still qualified to bitch about it" attitude just pisses me off.)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? by Zashi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm young and ignorant, but I have used many IBM applications (both internal and external). I am yet to see an app (especially one java based) come out of IBM that doesn't suck.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    2. Re:Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      That's fine, I take no issue with that comment at all. But please at least download and launch an app before criticizing it sight unseen and then complaining that your view isn't worth much. :)

      Cheers,

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    3. Re:Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me, do you like anal sex?

      Do you like the taste of fecal matter?

      There are many things that people don't have to try to feel that they don't like them. This attitude of feeling superior to people but still being a hypocrite just pisses me off.

    4. Re:Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quite enjoyed the stuff they put on their servers for quick-install (RAID config and Windows).

  35. Numeric string -> Number == Casting, no? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    I'm curious -- if the string is, in fact, wholly numeric, then what's the beef? How is this different from implicit casting? Or is implicit casting also wrong?

    I'm not baiting, I'm actually confused by your ire.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  36. Re:Forbidden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appears that openoffice.org is overwhelmed with download requests. I found this list of mirror sites ...
    http://ftp.stardiv.de/mirmon/mirror-state.html

  37. Re:Best feature for me? Tabs are next?? by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Everything else has tabs nowadays, perhaps splitable tabs will come next in the form of tab views. You could have different zooms as tabs or different docs have have multiple tabs showing as a split view - then you could edit docs side by side which would be great for refactoring.

  38. You are all Diseased ! :) by harlequinade · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're all crazy, and clearly high on 'herbal' products and noodle sauce. Keep it up!

    --
    Help feed homeless animals - Free! www.theanimalrescuesite.com
  39. Re:Forbidden by lubricated · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes there are times, where you use your foot, to move the foot shaped ball.

    --
    It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  40. Mirrors are available. by Diordna · · Score: 1

    You can still download OpenOffice from one of the mirrors in the list on this page: http://ftp.stardiv.de/mirmon/mirror-state.html

  41. OOXML by krygny · · Score: 4, Funny

    OpenOffice.org: "It's fully compliant and supports Microsoft OOXML file format."

    Microsoft: "AHAAAAHH!! That's not possible. Uh, ... I mean ... uh, ..." (Psst, hey, did we miss something? How'd they do that?)

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  42. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Hi! You must be a Python programmer! ;)

    (Full disclosure: I have two open source Python projects that I'm currently working on.)

  43. Re:fp! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    America was founded by terrorist. If you hate terrorists then you should be fighting for control of the US to go back to Britain.

  44. Not for OS X PPC, it's not by magnamous · · Score: 1

    Why did the OO.org guys go to the trouble of coding all the way up to 3.0.0RC4 for OS X PPC and then not release a final version? Why bother with all that effort if you're not going to actually release it?

    1. Re:Not for OS X PPC, it's not by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      With the bug tracker dead, it's hard to see for sure, but could it be that they found something in the RC that was broken on PPC but not on other platforms and weren't able to fix it before going live with the other versions?

      Some platforms are worth delaying the release for. OS X PPC is not one of them. ;)

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:Not for OS X PPC, it's not by magnamous · · Score: 1

      Thanks - that's a reasonable explanation. I hope that they do end up producing a PPC release relatively soon. I'd really like to try it.

  45. OO.o makes great .doc resumes! by Benanov · · Score: 4, Funny

    I make my resume in OO.o and save it to .ODF.

    I then take screenshots of it (or print to postscript), then paste the cropped screenshots into OO.o and save that result as a .DOC file.

    And hey, it keeps formatting exactly as you want it! :)

    1. Re:OO.o makes great .doc resumes! by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!!!

      That has got to be the funniest thing I have read in weeks!!!!! LOL!

    2. Re:OO.o makes great .doc resumes! by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Laugh all you want but this is how I get screen shots from my users!

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    3. Re:OO.o makes great .doc resumes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I then take screenshots of it (or print to postscript), then paste the cropped screenshots into OO.o and save that result as a .DOC file.

      The professional version of this process is to print the document out, take a photo of the printout placed on a wooden table, print the photo and finally scan it in.

      Then you can save the result as a .DOC, and you get to keep all your formatting and your current job!

  46. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm a translator, but yes! I have dabbled in Python. :) Does your previous comment mean that you don't like the implicit casting in Python? If so, why? Again, I'm not trolling -- I'm honestly interested in your views.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  47. Re:Forbidden by uberjoe · · Score: 1
    Use the torrents

    They work fine.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  48. Re:Forbidden by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Informative

    torrent magnet link for the Win32 English version, with JRE: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:IK2EAKZIEQ7VDH5CYDPYQ6MLL4FEUNLG Regular torrent link for Win32 English version with JRE: http://borft.student.utwente.nl/~adrian/torrentphp/torrent.php/OOo_3.0.0_Win32Intel_install_wJRE_en-US.exe.torrent Only 5 DLs, 51 seeds (including me) at the moment. The download was fairly quick.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  49. Again! by ohxten · · Score: 1

    This happened last time. Not one week after I download the 150MB+ installer, they come out with a new version.

    --
    Need an automatic screenshot taker? Try here.
  50. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Does your previous comment mean that you don't like the implicit casting in Python? If so, why? Again, I'm not trolling -- I'm honestly interested in your views.

    Cheers,

    Well, yes and no. It's a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can be very powerful -- grab a number from a string and start using it with no need to convert it. OTOH, it can cause subtle problems which you may not notice at first. My first programming languages were C and Pascal, so the implicit casting in Python is kind of weird, but kind of cool in a way.

    I think a good programmer can spot such problems. But should we expect spreadsheet designers to be good programmers?

  51. Re:fp! by tgrigsby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Okay, hang on. I love Obama, not just for his politics but for the kind of person he is, and I think slandering his character due to his association with Bill Ayers is a joke at best, but he was a terrorist. He blew up buildings, statues, whatever, in an attempt to use terror to get attention to his message. That does not compare against Washington, who led armies against armies. We were in the midst of a formally declared war between nations fought by armies.

    If it makes you feel better to call Ayers a "revolutionary", then fine. His only casualties, from what I've read, were members of his own group through an accident while building bombs. Having said that, in my book, he was a domestic terrorist, just an atypically innocuous one.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  52. Bouncer - Mirror Selection Still Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The official site which chooses which mirror to redirect you to is still up. You can use the form here to be redirected to a mirror for the version you'd like to download:

    http://openoffice.bouncer.osuosl.org/download-form.php

  53. Re:fp! by MarkvW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Most people under 40 did NOT support the Weathermen! Your statement is monumentally wrong. You could say that most people in Berkeley, or Bloomington, or Ann Arbor supported the SDS, maybe . . . .

    But the Weathermen? Never. The Weathermen were plain violent hypocrites.

  54. Spell checking by Socguy · · Score: 1

    I would be happy with the program as long as as a damn spell checker is functional after you install OOo. I installed the beta the other day and it seriously took me a half an hour of scanning through forums and messing around to get it working. And this was after already knowing that I had to do something from much earlier releases! Sure, it's easy once you know how, but it's a really bad first impression when you recommend the program as a alternative to MS word, only to end up receiving a phone call because the thing isn't spell checking! If a web browser can do it, there's not excuse for this. Of course, OOo isn't the only program guilty of this, (I'm looking at you too Abi word!)

  55. Re:fp! by gary_7vn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And that's why they was rioting in the streets and massive demonstrations against the government. http://uktv.co.uk/history/item/aid/570636 How were they "hypocrites"?

  56. Sun Microsystems is in an uncomfortable position by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    I heard Scott McNealy speak last week. I asked about OOo in the context of team projects where everyone else is using Windows/Office. I wasn't given an answer. The problem with OOo is that it's best for 'home' users or people that don't collaborate at all. For individuals it's perfect, but you won't be asked to join any projects if everyone knows your documents will be full of weird margins and text sizes.

  57. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

    I'm not a programmer. However, I do design spreadsheets. I can't imagine why a designer would intentionally pass a string to a function expecting a number. If it's a matter of end-user input, use data validation.

    The spreadsheet designers put strings into formulas...

    Why would you do this?

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  58. Re:fp! by tgrigsby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I am holding on. I guess we differ on the definition. The British considered Washington a 'rebel' and today would call him a "terrorist" for sure, you cannot argue with that.

    I could, but I'd rather argue against this:

    Here is the CIA definition: Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d): * The term 'terrorism' means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents. *

    Washington did not attack "noncombatant targets," nor did he employ, "the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion." (Merriam-Webster). Ayers did.

    To keep this short (got work to do), Ayers doesn't fit the CIA definition, but he does fit the Merriam-Webster one. As for the U.S. being a terrorist state... that's a whole 'nother discussion, and one I'm not inclined to agree with you on, for the most part. (Iraq, on the other hand...)

    Gary, it was nice chatting with you.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  59. Re:Forbidden, or we'll see runes or limericks.. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Forbidden Links, Forbidden Fruits; Nothing to Eat, Nothing to Poot".

    (Yeh, i know it's lame... but some may see it funny just the same...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  60. Re:Forbidden Pele? Hehehe... If Liquidpele by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    causes a Church of the Poisoned Hind, you'll need MaxiPriest to restore you from having gone blind...

    (Sorry, this from the prunester runester...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  61. Re:Great ... err ... "Marginal Comments", hehehe by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Anyway, this release has one feature that I've been longing after for years now: proper support for marginal comments."

    I hope you don't forget to remove disparaging (marginal) remarks from the margin/s...., hehehehe

    (My comments in the margins we not truly bad, but the system devise it had me bad...)

    (Prunester Runester/Punster Munster attacks!)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  62. Re:PDF... Have you used Lotus SmartSuite? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that have been a better starting point than that thing they call Symphony, which is quite a let-down to me, as I was hoping SmartSuite would have been the basis. Symphony is the name of an earlier Lotus product that got eclipsed by Lotus 1-2-3 and Lotus Approach.

    I am most deeply saddened that IBM simply cannot strip out the stuff to which they do not own patents, then ask the Open Source community to restore the broken functionality, then encourage people to comb the code and rebuilt then non-IBM patents version into a patent-free NEW SMART SUITE.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  63. Re:Can you spot the flaw in the reasoning? YOU- by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    are reminding me of "Return of the Living Dead", where two characters woke up from the gas leaked from the drum.

    The younger one said to the older one, "You stupid asshole!"

    The older one said, "You better watch your TONGUE BOY if you like this job."

    "LIKE THIS *JOB*????" exclaimed the younger one....

    Do you like your job? (hehehe)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  64. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Ummm, Python is strongly typed. Try to add "1" and 1 sometime and see what happens. I think you have it confused with Perl.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  65. x86_64 is available by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    A Linux x86_64 (64-bit) version of OpenOffice 3 is available from the openoffice.org website.
     
    Prior versions were available for download only in Linux/i386 versions. If you wanted a native 64-bit version you would either have to compile it yourself (which is supposed to be a real undertaking, though I've never tried it myself) or simply use the one that your distribution provides.
     
    The filename for the 64-bit Linux version is OOo_3.0.0_LinuxX86-64_install_en-US.tar.gz

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  66. Re:Sun Microsystems is in an uncomfortable positio by driehuis · · Score: 1

    Then consider switching the entire project team to OpenOffice. It's free (unlike MS-Office, where as a user community you're forced to upgrade when the first team member starts using the MS-Office-du-jour he got "for free" with his new laptop).

    I've had consistently bad experience with collaboration using MS-Office because of incompatibilities between MS-Office revisions and the cost of rectifying that situation.

    --

    Bert Driehuis -- All I asked was a friggin' rotatin' chair. Throw me a bone here, people.

  67. How to make a link to a Google Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://74.125.113.104/search?q=cache:chsA7FTyP3wJ:distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/+mirrors+openoffice&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

    Rather than linking to the single server 74.125.113.104, use www.google.com in the link.

    &hl=en
    &ct=clnk
    &cd=1
    and
    &gl=us
    are all noise.

    Your search string "mirrors+openoffice" is also noise.

    The link becomes http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:chsA7FTyP3wJ:distribution.openoffice.org/mirrors/

    gewg_

  68. Well I got mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got mine a little while ago, and finally (on my own) also got rid of that annoying basic bug soon after. You can scoff, but their site has an apology like its been slashdotted (not just slashdotted but dugg and a few others as well). I downloaded mine via bittorrent in about 8 minutes (not bad for 148 megabytes). I uninstalled my default ubuntu OOo and installed this beast. Starts up fast and looks nice. Will likely be in Ubuntu 8.10. Their site though is being hammered. I don't know what their traffic is like, but I'm guessing their traffic in a 1 hour period is like what Slashdot gets over 24 hours on a really bad/busy day.

  69. Wow, they still have those? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > It's one of those things that used to pop up and ask us to buy stuff before adblocker came out.

    The internet still has those!? I thought they vanished several years ago because I haven't seen one in so long.

  70. Too little, too late by DallasMay · · Score: 1

    The catch phrase these days is "the Cloud". Google Docs is now the new competitor to MS Office. OpenOffice.org is doomed to a 1995-2007 world. The rest of us will move on and up. I am alread 95% Google Docs. I do all my financing, testing, and data collecting from it. I have been using in almost entirely since I picked up my Teaching Certification with Dallas ISD. I now use it for lesson plans, worksheets, presentations, lectures, and just about everything else. Google Docs leaves MS Office and OOo in the dust when it comes to portability. I do all my work at home, and don't even have to worry about which flash drive it was saved on. I know its safe in the Clouds.

    --
    I've given up on Slashdot's comment scores.
    1. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...safe in the Clouds.

      I really hope you keep backups.

  71. Half of languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 3.0 version it's only available for half of the supported languages, the others must keep 2.4.1

  72. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Ummm, Python is strongly typed. Try to add "1" and 1 sometime and see what happens. I think you have it confused with Perl.

    Sure.


    >>> import decimal
    >>> d=decimal.Decimal
    >>> a="1"
    >>> b=1
    >>> print d(a)+d(b)
    2
    :-P

  73. Re:Forbidden by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Great link! Forbidden You don't have permission to access /servlets/ContentHelmNoodle on this server. Apache Server at www.openoffice.org Port 80

    Download from your favorite distro: Debian Experimental already has it in and works well within KDE 4.1.2 and Gnome. I've been using the RC candidates for a while.

  74. Re:Numeric string - Number == Casting, no? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    As long as we're casting about:

    >>> d=str
    >>> a="1"
    >>> b=1
    >>> print d(a)+d(b)
    '11'

    :-)

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  75. squeezed one out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > the OpenOffice.org team has finally squeezed out a new release

    You know, the image I get in my head from that line is not at all pleasant....

  76. Logic schmogic by sean4u · · Score: 1

    ....the opposite of irony is ebony

  77. Openoffice.org is officially here by gringer · · Score: 1

    To sit at 3-oh as the prince of your chair.

    [apologies to Will Smith]

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  78. OO History by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Sort of answering the thread: http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-Grows-Up/?kc=rss
    When Sun Microsystems bought the little-known StarOffice productivity suite in 1999, and soon thereafter released the product's code base as open-source software, it was unclear how far the arguably quixotic initiative might reachâ"and what damage it could possibly wreak on Microsoft's ironclad grip on the office productivity market.

    Now, nine years later, Sun is on the verge of a major 3.0 release of the project that grew up around that code base, OpenOffice.org. While OpenOffice.org hasn't achieved the same measure of mainstream adoption as its ideological cousin, the Firefox Web browser, the freely available office suite has helped advance the state of file format standardization, to the extent that Microsoft first developed its own open file format and is now prepared to include support for the ISO-standard OpenDocument format in Office 2007.

    It wasn't IBM but Sun... My Goof!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:OO History by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Oh Shit! The link leads onto a 'register to view article and get inundated with spam' site.
      Ignore please.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  79. Ooo as an essential file recovery tool for MSO by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Importing" is easier than implementing read/write, because "importing" doesn't have to be 100% accurate.

    Ooo is often VERY good at importing MS files, sometimes it's better at it than than MS apps, because the Ooo guys know that their code has to respond elegantly to unexpected departures from the strict file specs due to undocumented MS wrinkles. So if you use MSWord, you should probably have a copy of Ooo installed too, for emergency file-recovery purposes: if you ever get a corrupted Word file that Word refuses to read, there's a fair chance that Ooo will still be able to import it (and resave it in a format that Word can read).

  80. Re:fp! by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Was Ayer's intent to cause actual fear, or just annoyance?

    Blowing things up that don't belong to you may be antisocial, but doesn't automatically make someone a terrorist. Same goes for graffiti, public demonstrations, shoplifting and civil disobedience.

    Terrorism is about leveraging disproportionate fear to achieve political ends, often with a deliberate randomisation factor to spread fear more widely (sort of like the the inverse of the lottery's "It could be you" slogan).

    Similarly, you don't have to blow things up or destroy property or create immediate physical harm to be a terrorist. One can "terrorise" with dummy bombs or fake bomb threats, or threats relating to third parties ("boogeymen").

    In fact, technically, what the Bush administration did when they used unrealistic warnings about an Iraqi WMD programme to insist that the US population supported their invasion, could be argued as being terrorism. "Do exactly what we say or the terrorists will get you" could be argued as being a form of terrorism if the threat is unrealistic, as could "Let us do what we want or the terrorists win".

    So, given Condi's infamous warning about mushroom clouds, the attempt to push through draconian legislation in the wake of 9-11, the insistence on the need to invade Iraq and the characterisation of dissidents as being on the side of the terrorists (and then the use of the resulting ongoing war to help them get their second election win) ... I guess we could classify this administration as reasonably successful terrorists.

  81. Re:fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it's pretty damn obvious.

    As with this terrorist "Mafiaboy" who should be hanged, even 'tho he was only 15 at the time (See today'sother /. thread), perhaps Ayers and Obama should be hanged also.

    Although Obama was supposedly "only eight" when Ayers was dynamiting the WTC or whatever horrendous things he did, it's clear they are BOTH guilty.

    And it's a pity we did not know Obama back then! It would have been oh, so much easier to hang him as an an eight year old! And, golly- as a black too!

    And while we're at it it, let's hang a few of Ayer's fellow professors, and some of his students. They are guilty of associating with him after all.

      We say: "Hang 'em ALL, and let God (he's an American also) sort them out!"

        - - Republican Committee to extend Capital Punishment