>It's actually an excellent system for a low price.
I don't think so. Bigger cells are invariably better priced per W/h except if they come in exotic sizes. Chinese themselves have switches to LiFePo4 chemistry from LiCo or LiC (conventional li-ion) for all big cells years ago. Musk and co. will have to play catch-up hard, and they will have to retool the assembly line in the future invariably unless they want to produce worse cells, at higher than the market price...
Yes, but the screen will drink ~10 watts anyways. As Y are more of a genuine SoC, the rest of the chipset will be eating less than for U. As peak currents are less for Y, Dell most likely put a more feeble and less efficient DC-DC power converters. Wireless will eat the same amount of power regardless. A cheap WiFi chip that does half of the work of the chip in software can burn a lot of power if the host CPU is something low-power like Atom or Y (if you have a 45w cpu, a little overhead is not felt that big), the one that does everything inside drinks a lot of power by itself. A thinner package also means that battery cells
If you interested how the story ended: once Blackrock lamers finally found out where the winds are blowing, they bailed out of the enterprise, and CIC dumped their shares overnight at retail brokerage.
Most of those Stanfort schooled Chinese execs of public companies has less financial literacy than an average American housewife.
A "Harward grad" Liu Erh-fei who was to run CIC joint fund with Blackrock, for example did only 1 year single ECON course at Harward, but claims to have their MBA, and yes, the major shareholder and a boardmember of the fund was to be a wife of Hu Bing - a China Investment Co.'s chairman who did 2 year agricultural college.
My advice to that guy's kids: come to China, befriend some CCP shmuck on a level of provincial party commitee, and milk the local nouveaux riche untill the end of their days.
The amount of moneys stupid americons poured into Chinese good-for-nothing companies is staggering, it will last for a generation even if everybody with access to those money will smoke opium with hookers doin nothing their entire life.
In Shanghai, a dumb bloody _bike rental_ company of only 13 men got an $80m round, and later $20m and $30m from some american idiots. And what happened next, yes, their CFO wrote himself a $40m bonus and flew to Canada. That's all to it. What is remarkable, they are still getting more funding, while half of their bikes here are in unridable state.
P.S. tell kids to never ever buy company shares peddled by anybody whose surname ends on "itz"
> in 1998, we could hire assembly line workers for $3/day. Today, it costs ten times that and it takes much longer to staff up
It is still very very very cheap. Probably it is not in the realm of being so cheap as to be called ridiculously cheap anymore. And yes, the most labour intensive industries were leaving as far back as mid-nineties.
I want to put few points for manufacturing in China:
First: manufacturing cost != labour cost. Out of all industries, electronics manufacturing was already the one least reliant on labour cost, and least labour intensive to begin with. Even when Foxconn was partially reliant on manual board population for making ifones up to ifone 3gs, the whole assembly process did only cost them no more than $2 per unit, according to their books. If those dinosaur era manufacturing enterprises that rely on human labour to populate boards die out tomorrow, I will be only glad that they did so.
Second: while not much value can be extracted from low labour cost at the lower end, China still beats pretty much everybody on the higher end. Where else in the world can you hire a PhD level engineer with few years of work experience for less than usd $1k a month (i mean total cost including his social insurance and etc)? Nowhere except for China. Probably, some are there in former Soviet countries, but going there imho not worth the pain
This is what is wrong with Intel's approach to power management. Its idle current can approach that of arm chips, but once it works on full steam it munches close to ~90% of its TDP.
Intel guys once thought that pushing cpu to work on full steam will allow it finish the task faster, and enter the idle state. It is of course not so easy, and even in the ideal scenario such approach would only work for certain work profiles like work with low interactivity apps like msoffice
NSA is a bunch of lamers, having built such an espionage infrastructure and having a near zero exhaust from it is beyond simply something shameful and embarassing.
Russians can make a so much fuzz with a simple sql injection, and americans can only creep after merkel sexts to her husband with all those spysats and tapped networks.
Slashdot Mirror
>He blamed the entire concept of "ad-driven media on the Internet" as the root of the company's shortcomings.
Welcome to the Internet baby
>It's actually an excellent system for a low price.
I don't think so. Bigger cells are invariably better priced per W/h except if they come in exotic sizes. Chinese themselves have switches to LiFePo4 chemistry from LiCo or LiC (conventional li-ion) for all big cells years ago. Musk and co. will have to play catch-up hard, and they will have to retool the assembly line in the future invariably unless they want to produce worse cells, at higher than the market price...
Import marked up lithium film from China after paying Chinese export tax, then trying to compete with Chinese cell makers.
>RRDNS is written in Go
Their bugs are in HR department.
Who in the world hired people who are dumb enought to use an experimental language in production?
Yes, but the screen will drink ~10 watts anyways. As Y are more of a genuine SoC, the rest of the chipset will be eating less than for U. As peak currents are less for Y, Dell most likely put a more feeble and less efficient DC-DC power converters. Wireless will eat the same amount of power regardless. A cheap WiFi chip that does half of the work of the chip in software can burn a lot of power if the host CPU is something low-power like Atom or Y (if you have a 45w cpu, a little overhead is not felt that big), the one that does everything inside drinks a lot of power by itself. A thinner package also means that battery cells
Lots of trade-offs both ways.
in real life, the difference between Y and U is negligible: 2~3 w/h
Sharia law for Israel
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic...
In light of this, I believe the next thing they will release will be a magnetic buttplug
If you interested how the story ended: once Blackrock lamers finally found out where the winds are blowing, they bailed out of the enterprise, and CIC dumped their shares overnight at retail brokerage.
Most of those Stanfort schooled Chinese execs of public companies has less financial literacy than an average American housewife.
A "Harward grad" Liu Erh-fei who was to run CIC joint fund with Blackrock, for example did only 1 year single ECON course at Harward, but claims to have their MBA, and yes, the major shareholder and a boardmember of the fund was to be a wife of Hu Bing - a China Investment Co.'s chairman who did 2 year agricultural college.
My advice to that guy's kids: come to China, befriend some CCP shmuck on a level of provincial party commitee, and milk the local nouveaux riche untill the end of their days.
The amount of moneys stupid americons poured into Chinese good-for-nothing companies is staggering, it will last for a generation even if everybody with access to those money will smoke opium with hookers doin nothing their entire life.
In Shanghai, a dumb bloody _bike rental_ company of only 13 men got an $80m round, and later $20m and $30m from some american idiots. And what happened next, yes, their CFO wrote himself a $40m bonus and flew to Canada. That's all to it. What is remarkable, they are still getting more funding, while half of their bikes here are in unridable state.
P.S. tell kids to never ever buy company shares peddled by anybody whose surname ends on "itz"
> in 1998, we could hire assembly line workers for $3/day. Today, it costs ten times that and it takes much longer to staff up
It is still very very very cheap. Probably it is not in the realm of being so cheap as to be called ridiculously cheap anymore. And yes, the most labour intensive industries were leaving as far back as mid-nineties.
I want to put few points for manufacturing in China:
First: manufacturing cost != labour cost. Out of all industries, electronics manufacturing was already the one least reliant on labour cost, and least labour intensive to begin with. Even when Foxconn was partially reliant on manual board population for making ifones up to ifone 3gs, the whole assembly process did only cost them no more than $2 per unit, according to their books. If those dinosaur era manufacturing enterprises that rely on human labour to populate boards die out tomorrow, I will be only glad that they did so.
Second: while not much value can be extracted from low labour cost at the lower end, China still beats pretty much everybody on the higher end. Where else in the world can you hire a PhD level engineer with few years of work experience for less than usd $1k a month (i mean total cost including his social insurance and etc)? Nowhere except for China. Probably, some are there in former Soviet countries, but going there imho not worth the pain
designs are sourced wholesale from taiwanese design house mills. Running design in house, hiring expensive talended designers is not profitable
This is what is wrong with Intel's approach to power management. Its idle current can approach that of arm chips, but once it works on full steam it munches close to ~90% of its TDP.
Intel guys once thought that pushing cpu to work on full steam will allow it finish the task faster, and enter the idle state. It is of course not so easy, and even in the ideal scenario such approach would only work for certain work profiles like work with low interactivity apps like msoffice
BDSM - Business developments, Sales, and Marketing
I know better way: kill him
>but the photos and footage will show large numbers of young, fighting-age men,
PERFECT! Germany needs more soldiers to fight scum
Passports and legal citizenship of the first world countries are a stapple good on the black market
>has little corruption
You mean a country where the president holds a personal pension fund funded by people's taxes?
Violators of the Geneva convention are FILTH
All thanks to PHB dominated critical government agencies, and intellectually inbred waspy culture in USA government.
NSA is a bunch of lamers, having built such an espionage infrastructure and having a near zero exhaust from it is beyond simply something shameful and embarassing.
Russians can make a so much fuzz with a simple sql injection, and americans can only creep after merkel sexts to her husband with all those spysats and tapped networks.
Transparency of the democratic process is paramount.
Anybody hindering transparency must be exterminated.
you are a pussy