SUMMARY: Tom Paris, navigator of the starship Voyager, discovers a way to travel at warp 10. Which, until now, was apparently a "theoretical impossibility", and means the same thing as achieving "infinite velocity". His test flight is a raging success, except for the part where he mutates and his body can no longer process oxygen or water, and his head expands to twice its normal size and various body parts fall off. The holographic Doctor races to find a cure, but not before Paris kidnaps Captain Janeway, subjects her to a warp 10 shuttle flight, and causes them both to mutate into... no, no, it's just too stupid. You'll never believe me if I just blurt it out like this. Read the whole recap, and just maybe you'll believe an ending this idiotic was actually scripted and filmed.
Why would they think this appeals to 20-somethings? The show has been on for 20 years. Its audience is probably older (on the order of late 30s to early 40s), although most data on demographics that I can find gives a rating to a very broad demographic of 18 to 49.
There is certainly nothing particularly cutting edge about the show today. Years ago, yes.
...the digital nomad also cut loose all links with cubicle nation, including the employee contract. Instead, they work on agile projects, where groups of people can dynamically recombine online...
Yes, but can they monetize that synergy using the cloud computing paradigm?
I started showing up at meetings pronto to "keep the company on track with IT and software projects". It was worth it to waste 8 hours a week in meetings to avoid months upon months on projects initiated by people who had no clue how technology works.
Maybe you could just send in a Teddy Ruxpin that loops a tape of you saying "NO..."?
You are obviously a dead-brained, right-wing, Limbaugh-listening, Intelligent-Design-believing "tard". I, for one, anxiously await your "Flamebait" and "Troll" moderations!
Slashdot Mirror
Feel the agony...
Why would they think this appeals to 20-somethings? The show has been on for 20 years. Its audience is probably older (on the order of late 30s to early 40s), although most data on demographics that I can find gives a rating to a very broad demographic of 18 to 49. There is certainly nothing particularly cutting edge about the show today. Years ago, yes.
What can't they most the least?
get_real_name_of_this_language();
Maybe?
RoboCop... I bought mine at the same time I got the anti-theft system that electrocutes the would-be thief!
...they can write them, why not grade them?
really now mate. That works?
All you need is a post-it note saying "do not turn off!! SERVER!!!!"
Gmail does have a basic HTML version... I am not sure, but I assume the link to that version would be at least visible in your browser?
(Chris Hansen enters room) Why don't you just have a seat right over there...
Here's one anyway, regarding the banning of the film from viewing in British schools: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm
"Imply, Lisa? Or implode?"
I would have suspected that Americans might have fallen prey more easily. Hard times can lead to more desperate measures.
Or maybe people are turning off their Internet service...
Don't wait for the translation! Answer me now!
Yes, but can they monetize that synergy using the cloud computing paradigm?
Maybe you could just send in a Teddy Ruxpin that loops a tape of you saying "NO..."?
And you haven't run out of fuel yet?
"red coat" gets a Troll -1? What, too soon?
Just like my ex-girlfriend!
You are obviously a dead-brained, right-wing, Limbaugh-listening, Intelligent-Design-believing "tard". I, for one, anxiously await your "Flamebait" and "Troll" moderations!
Do you remember that David won that contest? I don't think that was the point you were making...
...George Bush caused Katrina, and he's out of office now.
They will hire the same guys that count how many jobs Barack Obama has saved!
Man, I hope this doesn't erupt in a flame-fest in this otherwise uncontroversial thread.
Maybe Congress should mandate warp drive, since it's so good at inspiring technical innovation?