Slashdot Mirror


Exoplanet Has Showers of Pebbles

mmmscience writes "The newly-discovered exoplanet COROT-7b has an unusual form of precipitation: rocks. Because it orbits so close to its sun, the temperature on its sun-facing side is around 4220 degrees Fahrenheit. That's hot enough for rocks to vaporize — not unlike water evaporating on Earth. And, like Earth, when the vapor cools in the upper atmosphere, it forms clouds and begins to rain. But instead of water, COROT-7b gets a shower of pebbles."

341 comments

  1. Wow by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's pretty cool, in a geeky sort of way.

    I wish I could see it... but I don't think the environment would be terribly friendly to my sensitive skin.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Wow by geoffrobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I'm part Irish too. I can't stand being in the Sun/insert favorite star here.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    2. Re:Wow by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I wish I could see it... but I don't think the environment would be terribly friendly to my sensitive skin.

      Just put on an extra thick layer of sunscreen and you should be fine.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Wow by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      You could just turn up the air conditioner. Of course, then if it gets too cold, you can crank up the heater. And if the heater's too strong, you could crank up the AC. Then maybe make some icy margaritas. Just don't hit the "fuel guzzler" and make pop-tarts at the same time!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Wow by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Sunblock 5000 Get it now, also you get bonus points on your geek card if you know where this is from before even looking at it.

    5. Re:Wow by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I'd guess Futurama.

    6. Re:Wow by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it feels very real to you.

      On August 29th, 1997, it's gonna feel pretty fucking real to you too. Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is gonna have a real bad day. Get it?

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
    7. Re:Wow by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's pretty cool, in a geeky sort of way.

      I wish I could see it... but I don't think the environment would be terribly friendly to my sensitive skin.

      Break out the SPF 15000000 and put it on with a trowel.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      RoboCop! What do I win?!

    9. Re:Wow by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Wow, I really had to search for that one,
      I feel stupid since I love Terminator Series so much.
      3 Crazy Girl, Sarah Connor.

    10. Re:Wow by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      RoboCop... I bought mine at the same time I got the anti-theft system that electrocutes the would-be thief!

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen to the rhythm of the pebble rain
      Telling me just what a fool I've been
      I wish that it would go and let me cry in vain
      And let me be alone again

    12. Re:Wow by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Do I get partial credit for thinking it was from the first movie? Or wanting to buy it for a dollar?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    13. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Bruce Hornsby

    14. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, it's not so bad.

      (On the Net, no one knows you're a Horta)

    15. Re:Wow by Triela · · Score: 0

      I don't think the environment would be terribly friendly to my sensitive skin.

      Blame it on the rain that was falling, falling
      Blame it on the stars that shine at night

    16. Re:Wow by clone53421 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Whoosh.

      Also, 29 Aug 2007 was the date of the 2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident. Ironic?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    17. Re:Wow by Reaperducer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironic?

      No, Ms. Morissette. Just coincidental.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    18. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The planet is tidally locked. Just stay on the dark side of the planet. The equilibrium temperature there is 59F -- not bad at all.

      One thing that occurs to me is that if the mass transfer rate is as high as they're suggesting -- and I have no reason to suspect otherwise -- it seems to me that this planet would be *highly* tectonically active. Unlike rain, which just runs off, the pebbles will stick around where they fall. This means that the crust will have a lot of weight bearing down on it on the cold side, sinking into the mantle and likely leading to heavy volcanism and tectonic activity. And the erosion of the hot side should lead to an upwelling of exposed mantle material as the planet tries to relax into a sphere.

      The awesome thing is, with such a reasonable temperature on the cool side, it could actually be habitable to LAWKI -- except for that likely lack of water thing, (unless there's been heavy cometary activity since the planet became tidally locked).

      This planet must have an incredible range of minerals, way unlike anything on Earth -- the star basically mining the crust and even mantle on one side and depositing it after chemical vapor deposition onto the other side. If we ever go interstellar as a species, I wouldn't be surprised to see heavy mining activity on planets like that.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    19. Re:Wow by gorillo · · Score: 1

      No fate but what we make...

    20. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, and sweet -- Some more highlights after further reading:

      "Sodium, potassium, silicon monoxide and then oxygen -- either atomic or molecular oxygen -- make up most of the atmosphere." But there are also smaller amounts of the other elements found in silicate rock, such as magnesium, aluminum, calcium and iron. ... As you go higher the atmosphere gets cooler and eventually you get saturated with different types of 'rock' the way you get saturated with water in the atmosphere of Earth ... Elemental sodium and potassium, which have very low boiling points in comparison with rocks, do not rain out but would instead stay in the atmosphere, where they would form high gas clouds buffeted by the stellar wind from COROT-7.

      So... the only one of those things that will be a gas at the surface on the far side is oxygen. The article says the atmosphere may not be breathable, but I have to wonder... why not?

      Also, in the case what what condenses in the atmosphere is crystaline (I don't see anywhere which suggests whether they would be or not -- it all depends on how fast it cools), look at the list of the raining minerals:

      enstatite, corundum, spinel, and wollastonite.

      Enstatite can be a gemstone. Crystals of corundum are otherwise known as ruby and sapphire. There are many types of spinels, a number of whose crystals are considered gemstones. Etc. So *if* what condenses is crystalline, it could literally be raining gems on that planet.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could see it... but I don't think the environment would be terribly friendly to my sensitive skin.

      Oh, man up. They have sunscreen now. Invest in a bottle or two.

    22. Re:Wow by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone not wearing one million sunblock is going to have a real bad day, get it?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    23. Re:Wow by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So... the only one of those things that will be a gas at the surface on the far side is oxygen. The article says the atmosphere may not be breathable, but I have to wonder... why not?

      Metals poisoning, I'm thinking. When was the last time you tried to breathe some iron?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    24. Re:Wow by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I wonder what shape the planet is in, i.e., how much this constant redistribution of mass would overcome the gravitational tendency to pull the whole planet into a sphere. Unlike Earth and the gas giants, there wouldn't be centrifugal force squeezing the equator out. I imagine this planet has the kind of geological activity that makes Io look placid.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    25. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic?

      No, Ms. Morissette. Just coincidental.

      Don't ya think? :D

    26. Re:Wow by camperdave · · Score: 1

      But isn't Mr Playitsafe's comment, "Well, isn't this nice", as his plane was crashing an example of irony?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    27. Re:Wow by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the rain of pebbles it might never form a hard crust but instead be a ball of semi-loose material with a liquid core. There would probably be a "hard" concrete like layer but nothing on the order of tectonic plates so it may be able to form into a sphere rather rapidly constantly shifting so that the shift isn't as noticeable. You might not even see earthquakes there, as the rain would cause more than enough vibration that the underlying shifting of the inner planet would be lost in the noise.

    28. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 1

      Iron doesn't stay gasseous at 50K.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    29. Re:Wow by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or ultra fine crystal shards and glass...lots and lots of dust I think would get your lungs long before the metals would poison your lungs.

    30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insert favorite star here.

      Sounds REALLY painful

    31. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 1

      Hey, breathing through a mask is better than not breathing. :)

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    32. Re:Wow by EvilBudMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think Communism is still alive and kicking.

    33. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ok....

      Gasmask... CHECK!
      Safety Goggles.... CHECK!
      FTL Drive.... Oh Dang.

    34. Re:Wow by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      In the desert we get virga, when the condensate never hits the ground because it re-evaporates... I wonder if this might happen on COROT-7b. Also, you might get some fractional distillation going with different minerals settling out at different temperatures (i.e. altitudes). That would be really cool if there were little copper lumps and little zinc lumps with a nice mist of lead and other soft metals floating over the whole thing... the universe's largest dry cell battery!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    35. Re:Wow by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I always took it as an expression of sarcasm.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    36. Re:Wow by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm part Irish too. I can't stand being in the Sun/insert favorite star here.

      Is that why you guys spend so much time in bars? I thought it was because you just liked to drink ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    37. Re:Wow by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative
      I always took it as an expression of sarcasm.

      From Wikipedia

      Verbal irony is a disparity of expression and intention: when a speaker says one thing but means another, or when a literal meaning is contrary to its intended effect. An example of this is sarcasm.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    38. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article linked from the TFA, you'll see that the hot side is 2600K (way too hot), and the dark side is 50K (way too cold). You'd have to park somewhere in the twilight zone.

    39. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 1

      In the desert we get virga, when the condensate never hits the ground because it re-evaporates... I wonder if this might happen on COROT-7b.

      Probably on the hot side and in the transition zones. There'd be nothing to re-evaporate it on the cool side, though.

      Also, you might get some fractional distillation going with different minerals settling out at different temperatures (i.e. altitudes).

      You probably would. Which would lead to a different regional distribution of their "precipitation". The surface deposits on this planet would be truly fascinating.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    40. Re:Wow by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Shit, it would'a been a whole lot more ironic if the date had been the same (which I thought it was) instead of 10 years off. That's embarrassing...

      29 Aug 1997 was "At least 98 villagers are killed by the Armed Islamic Group of Algeria GIA in the Rais massacre, Algeria." Not anything remotely resembling ironic... :(

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    41. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 1

      With the rain of pebbles it might never form a hard crust but instead be a ball of semi-loose material with a liquid core.

      On the surface it'd be loose, sure, but they'll compact under their own weight, the increasing temperature, and increasing pressure further down. Nature abhors a vacuum.

      On the other hand... I wouldn't be surprised if this greatly aided getting trapped gasses into the magma from the subsiding crust. I'd expect the oxygen to just re-incorporate into the rock, but any other gasses present (say, nitrogen, argon, CO, CO2, etc) could make for pretty violent eruptions.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    42. Re:Wow by LoSt180 · · Score: 1

      That planet is hot stuff!

    43. Re:Wow by kitezh · · Score: 1

      And don't forget your kevlar umbrella, in case it rains.

    44. Re:Wow by agrif · · Score: 1

      Just turn down the biophysics model locally, or create a discontinuous environment bubble.

      Or rather, do that whenever you arrive there. It'll be a while... make sure you don't grow too big to transmit.

    45. Re:Wow by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Who else here had a flashback to Gauntlet Legends?

    46. Re:Wow by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      At least it's a dry heat.

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    47. Re:Wow by ascari · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So *if* what condenses is crystalline, it could literally be raining gems on that planet.

      Thanks a bunch, dude! Now that you told the effing world about it every punk in the galaxy will come flying bucket in hand. (tentacle/suction cup/etc) Why exactly do you think we stressed the "unbreathable atmosphere" etc? Thanks again, buddy.

    48. Re:Wow by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Hey, you had an extra "r" in that post.

    49. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like pebble rain on your wedding day.

    50. Re:Wow by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      The surface deposits on this planet would be truly fascinating.

      Almost as fascinating as one of the weather reports:

      "Mostly cloudy overnight with a 50% chance of ironstorms tomorrow. The high temperature will be 2200 K, low tomorrow night 50 K. In the five day forecast, corundum showers are expected to move in from the west..."

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    51. Re:Wow by atheistmonk · · Score: 1

      They are both good reasons, t'be sure. Personally, I prefer to cut out the middleman. I just take my bottle of Jameson to work.

    52. Re:Wow by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm Welsh. I should be ok living there if it's just rocks falling on me.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    53. Re:Wow by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      What *does* stay gaseous at 50 Kelvins? Even liquid nitrogen boils at 77 K.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    54. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we ever go interstellar as a species, I wouldn't be surprised to see heavy mining activity on planets like that.

      I wonder if there'd be much dilithium ?

    55. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helium, Hydrogen, Neon - under atmospherical pressure. More if the pressure is low enough.

      -- C.O.

    56. Re:Wow by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Robocop 2, wasn't it? I seem to remember a few of those commercials in the movie, one about a car alarm with 50.000 volts as well...

      It's been a few (*cough*) years though, so I might be wrong.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    57. Re:Wow by RivenAleem · · Score: 0

      Etc. So *if* what condenses is crystalline, it could literally be raining gems on that planet.



      No, when water vapor cools down and condenses, it forms water droplets. Thus you will have molten drops of Ruby and Sapphire. In order for you to get crystals you will need for it to freeze as it condenses. As such, it won't rain gems, but rather Snow gems. There are, thus, some inherent problems with is. Where will one get a Carrot and lumps of Coal?
    58. Re:Wow by phulegart · · Score: 1

      ... and you'd be wrong...

      Sunblock 5000 was one of the beautiful things brought to us from the ROBOCOP franchise... along with "I'd buy THAT for a dollar!"

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    59. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there's no gold in the atmosphere. I hear that makes for a nice afternoon shower.

  2. Not unusual by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    We get solid precipitation here on earth all the time.

    Sometimes it's hail, sometimes sleet.

    The best is frogs, though.

    1. Re:Not unusual by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We get solid precipitation here on earth all the time.

      The parent raises a good point. How do we know the rock comes back down to the surface as a solid? Why doesn't it rain lava?

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Not unusual by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      at what temperature does lava solidify?, figure that out and i bet you will have your answer.

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:Not unusual by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The best is frogs, though.

      Yeah, but frogs are mostly liquid (rigid bags of water just like us).

      I mean, there's a reason it's called "a rain of frogs" not a "blizzard of frogs" or a "hailstorm of frogs".

      That said, my actual favorite is when it rains fish.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Not unusual by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      The parent raises a good point. How do we know the rock comes back down to the surface as a solid? Why doesn't it rain lava?

      I'm going to make an educated guess, and say it's in the same way we "know" that it rains any kind of rock at all -- because that's what the simulations said. It says they even varied constraints based on not knowing exactly what the composition of the planet is, but they kept ending up with the same basic result.

      So it all comes down to how good the simulation model is. It's possible it's inaccurate in a way that it is right that there is rock-based precipitation, but that it's in liquid form, but I certainly have no idea.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Not unusual by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      This calls for... a song!

      Give me that Liquid Lava Love, Just can't get enough
      Slow like honey, oh so foamy, I like your flow
      Liquid lava love, you make me erupt
      Overflowing, don't cha know I'm 'bout to explode

      Girl you got my fire burning, body yearning
      Can't take it no more, can't take it no more
      Rain is falling, why you staling
      I can't take it no more, can't take it no more
      This volcano's ready to blow
      So just lay back and take it and let it go
      Let your liquid lava flow...

      Somehow I don't think Keven Michael was thinking about a rocky planet when he wrote Liquid Lava Love haha.

      --
      Be relentless!
    6. Re:Not unusual by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just glad it doesn't rain horses.

    7. Re:Not unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50% of my friends prefer when it rains men...

    8. Re:Not unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, but frogs are mostly liquid (rigid bags of water just like us).

      Hey! That's "ugly bags of mostly water" to you.

    9. Re:Not unusual by fireslack · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Am I the only one who is deeply impressed that we even KNOW a planet is there? It is difficult to observe Mercury because of its proximity to the sun, but we can see a planet that is 1.7 Earth radii, 42 light years away, and is so close to its parent star, it has an orbital period of 20 hours. Hours! That means it is insanely close to its star. Solid rock or lava be damned. How about a pat on the back for finding any exoplanets at all?

      --
      This sig only exists because you are observing it.
    10. Re:Not unusual by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      and, what do they build their damns out of?

    11. Re:Not unusual by dargaud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's probably because it passes in front of its sun at every orbit, and we can see the noticeable difference in luminosity. Mercury rarely goes in front of the sun and the luminosity difference is in the epsilon range.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    12. Re:Not unusual by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --Why doesn't it rain lava?--

      We'll silly that's because the atmosphere cools the molten lava off and it forms rocks before they hit the ground ;~()

      OR....maybe the molecules get stimulated from a liquid to a solid by solar flares. Yeah, that's it. There's your answer. You know like when you fart rocks you get asteroids.

    13. Re:Not unusual by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't it rain lava?

      Next up, on Christian Science: Scientists claim to have located Hell!

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:Not unusual by Curate · · Score: 1

      Could there be a planet somewhere that actually rains cats and dogs?

    15. Re:Not unusual by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i was not aware that frogs where really considered a solid. i mean really, they are made up of a lot of water, just like people. (you know why frogs sit around all day drinking water? its in case something picks them up)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    16. Re:Not unusual by sohare · · Score: 1

      We get solid precipitation here on earth all the time.

      Sometimes it's hail, sometimes sleet.

      The best is frogs, though.

      While the parent's post is in jest I did want to point out that it probably does not actually rain frogs or fish. It's popularly proposed that waterspouts serve as the mechanism by which frogs and fish plummet to the earth. It turns out however, that this really isn't a plausible explanation.

      Waterspouts come in two basic varieties. One type is a local phenomenon similar to a dust devil on land. Such a waterspout only marginally affects a body of water's surface. The second type is a supercell tornadic waterspout. Inside such a waterspout the decreased air pressure can cause water to rise by about as much as half a meter, but no water is actually sucked up inside. The visible column of the waterspout is composed primarily of condensation. Sometimes the waterspout will pick up spray from wavelets and hurl it outward, but that's about it. There is really no mechanism for which a waterspout can transport a large column of water high into the air.

      In tornadoes objects often hurl things upward and out, but how often does a tornado preserve the spatial location of a group of objects? Moreover, in most reports involving raining frogs there is rarely if ever any mention of a nearby waterspout.

      Now, every spring and fall many frogs migrate from breeding ponds to deeper waters such as lakes. Since they are amphibians, a prime time to migrate is shortly after a rainstorm when everything is moist. If a day has the right conditions, you can see swarms of frogs migrating across terrain that normally sees little frog action. Let's say you look out your window during a rain storm and see thousands of frogs jumping around. It's not a far stretch to imagine that they might be falling from the sky and bouncing around. Of course, if the frogs were really falling from the sky they would probably be completely smashed. Reports of frog rain rarely involve thousands of squished frogs. All it takes to create a frog rain story is a healthy imagination and exaggerated second and third hand reports.

      Fish are a slightly different matter, but not really. There are actually many species of fish which walk on land for one reason or another. In 2008 there was a report that 30 catfish emerged from a sewer after a heavy rain storm in Florida and had a merry time in the streets. Some fish even have special organs which allow them to get oxygen from air. The climbing perches of Africa and Asia are such a group. They walk using their gills, fins, and tail. If you actually saw one, however, you wouldn't think it really capable of wandering around on land. Such is the case with many walking fish. The lay person sees such a fish and automatically assumes it could not have gotten to its current dry location by its own means.

      Finally, as far as we know no one has actually ever observed fish and frogs falling from the sky. What probably happens is that people see masses of frogs or fish on land and assume they fell from the sky and then tell reporters that indeed they saw the fish and frogs raining from the skies. As you can now see, though, there is a much more mundane and likely explanation.

    17. Re:Not unusual by specific · · Score: 1

      Lluvia de Peces is something i would love to witness. I wonder how "fish & frogs" turned into the saying "raining cats & dogs".

      --
      If you lend someone $20 and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.
    18. Re:Not unusual by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      Actually the way they find planets outside of our solar system is by measuring the "wobble" caused by the planets gravity as it orbits the star. Thus, it is much easier to find large planets with more gravity and planets that are closer to the star with shorter, more observable orbital periods.

    19. Re:Not unusual by dargaud · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are several planetary detection methods and 'transit' is indeed one of them.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    20. Re:Not unusual by catscan2000 · · Score: 1

      Or, my favorite, a planet where it's raining men ;-) (with apologies to the Weather Girls)

    21. Re:Not unusual by QuoteMstr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely right. What we consider liquid and solid depends on our local environment. In the outer planets of our solar system, water is a rock. It behaves just like rocks here on Earth do: it faults tectonically, crystallizes in various forms, and differentiates into crust, mantle, and core. These bodies have "hydro-"logical cycles made up of methane, which is normally a gas for us.

      It's not unusual at all for something we consider to a be a "rock" actually form the hydrological cycle for a much warmer body.

    22. Re:Not unusual by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad it doesn't rain poop.

    23. Re:Not unusual by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely right. What we consider liquid and solid depends on our local environment. In the outer planets of our solar system, water is a rock.

      Actually, water is a liquid, while rocks are solid. So water is not a rock.

      Ice could be considered a rock through, depending on the context.

  3. The sky is falling? by gblackwo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Neato

    1. Re:The sky is falling? by LanMan04 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The sky is falling?

      More like the ground is falling...from the sky.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:The sky is falling? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So it's like Australia?

    3. Re:The sky is falling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What! No Meatballs?!

    4. Re:The sky is falling? by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Hey!! As an Australian I find your comment very off- okay, you're right. Just like Australia. :(

    5. Re:The sky is falling? by VoltageX · · Score: 1

      Yes mate. Be sure to bring your hard hat when you visit.

      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
  4. Summary inaccurate by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a hypothesized event. The evidence for it is slim based primarily on modeling. While this is really cool if correct, one needs to understand that this isn't by any means a slam dunk.

    1. Re:Summary inaccurate by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True. Also, I'm wondering if "pebbles" is an appropriate description of the condensed rock or if it wouldn't be more aptly described as "sand" or even "dust". Raindrops stick together; depending on how quickly the rock condenses, it might not have time to grow very large. (Then again, it could grow like hail, if the rock was in the liquid state for any significant amount of time.)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Summary inaccurate by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, the original press release also mangles observed and simulated results like crazy. They've definitely found the exoplanet and determined its orbit and mass. They've either confirmed or hypothesised from simulation that there are no volatile compounds on or around the planet, which they hypothesise is due to bake-out. They've hypothesised based on simulations that it is likely to have a rock-based atmosphere which, depending on composition, could be verified spectroscopically.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Summary inaccurate by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. "Pebbles" is probably inaccurate. I find it hard to believe the hypothesis that there are storms on this planet where redheaded female pre-historic babies with pony tails fall out of the sky.

    4. Re:Summary inaccurate by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm totally hypothesizing a bake-out right now, too. It's like the scientists and I are totally on the same wavelength, man.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    5. Re:Summary inaccurate by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Informative

      While this is really cool if correct, one needs to understand that this isn't by any means a slam dunk.

      Well, it does come quite close to being a "slam dunk".

    6. Re:Summary inaccurate by oldhack · · Score: 1

      This is turning into a gag. Can any of you point to a single Slashdot story where headline/summary were reasonably accurate? Say in the last year or so.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  5. Flintstones by SirLoadALot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just like on the Flintstones, where everything is made out of stone -- because it's the Stone Age, silly! Further research will reveal the pterodactyl airplanes, I'm sure.

    1. Re:Flintstones by FudRucker · · Score: 1
      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:Flintstones by ianmkz · · Score: 1

      SQUAAAWK, it's a living...!

    3. Re:Flintstones by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      At least the stone umbrellas will sell.

    4. Re:Flintstones by Maniacal · · Score: 0, Troll

      You were modded "insightful". I would say whoosh but I don't even think that applies.

      --
      MG
    5. Re:Flintstones by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      At 4220F? Rather "roasted to dust"(TM) pterodactyl "chicken" I'd say!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Flintstones by aqk · · Score: 0

      Flintstones???

      WTF does that have to do with Pebbles?

  6. Related to the current poll ? by slashmatteo · · Score: 5, Informative

    "the temperature on its sun-facing side is around 4220 degrees Fahrenheit." For anyone using the SI, this is about 2327 degrees Celsius

    1. Re:Related to the current poll ? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for the conversion...I never know what to wear when they give the temperature in Fahrenheit. Thanks to your post, though, I now know I won't need to pack a jacket while visiting this planet.

    2. Re:Related to the current poll ? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      "the temperature on its sun-facing side is around 4220 degrees Fahrenheit."

      For anyone using the SI, this is about 2327 degrees Celsius

      From where I sit, anything over 1000 is all the same to me... FRIGGIN HOT! To me, there is really no difference between 4220 Celsius and 4220 Fahrenheit. I'm sure there are differences when you have to consider the temps that rock melts or whatever, but once the temp gets high enough to kill me in less than a second, it's all the same to me.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for those of you not familiar with the farenheit scale: 0 is cold, 100 is hot, and 4220 is so fucking hot you don't care what scale it it.

    4. Re:Related to the current poll ? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or 2599 kelvin

      Or the heat from burning 2 library's on congress.

      Anyone know what it is in elephants ?

    5. Re:Related to the current poll ? by strateego · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe that SI unit for temperature is kelvin. So 4220 degrees Fahrenheit is approximately 2600 degree Kelvin. Fixed it for you. No need to thank me.

    6. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Anyone know what it is in elephants ?"

      African or Indian?

    7. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's 5418 libraries of congress.

    8. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What do you mean? African or european elephants?

    9. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or the heat from burning 2 library's on congress.

      Do libraries burn differently on congress than anywhere else?

    10. Re:Related to the current poll ? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      42

    11. Re:Related to the current poll ? by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks,and stop calling me Kelvin

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    12. Re:Related to the current poll ? by gsslay · · Score: 4, Funny

      I now know I won't need to pack a jacket while visiting this planet.

      Please yourself. But I'll be taking my tungsten jacket (melting point 3422 Celcius, 6192 Fahrenheit).

      You know, the one my grandmother bought me..... with the hood and the double pleated asbestos lining? I don't care if you've never liked it and it doesn't match my shoes, I'm wearing it.

    13. Re:Related to the current poll ? by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So 4220 degrees Fahrenheit is approximately 2600 degree Kelvin. Fixed it for you.
      is approximately 2600 degree Kelvin
      degree Kelvin

      Fail. Hand in your geek card.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    14. Re:Related to the current poll ? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      Using Fahrenheit is generally questionable, but this is just plain wrong.
      And when it's hot enough, there's not much difference anymore between C and K.
      So why not use C or K?

    15. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European?

      Oh, you mean those ones the Brits took from India?

    16. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Kjella · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, there's so much hot air there they burn way better.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    17. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x celsius = x kelvin, for enough large value of x.

    18. Re:Related to the current poll ? by ionix5891 · · Score: 0

      Anyone know what it is in elephants ?

      Asian or African ones?

    19. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What about -40Â?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

      I thought it was:

      x degrees Celsius = (y Kelvin - 273)

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
    21. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2600 Kelvin

      Fixed that for YOU...

    22. Re:Related to the current poll ? by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1

      x=x-273.15 ?
      DOES NOT COMPUTE.
      lp0 on fire

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
    23. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Celsius is still an official SI unit and the most used unit for temperature world wide I guess it's okay to stick with it.

    24. Re:Related to the current poll ? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      x=x-273.15 ?
      DOES NOT COMPUTE.


      Not a programmer, are you?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in American: gawd damned hawt

    26. Re:Related to the current poll ? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --Anyone know what it is in elephants ?--

      Asteroids of course.

    27. Re:Related to the current poll ? by alexo · · Score: 1

      "the temperature on its sun-facing side is around 4220 degrees Fahrenheit." For anyone using the SI, this is about 2327 degrees Celsius

      I suspect that the original figure was a nice, round, 2600 Kelvin.

    28. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Amanitin · · Score: 1

      Anyone know what it is in elephants ?

      Fuck elephants.
      Give it to me in cars.

    29. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Trogre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shirley you can't be Sirius?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    30. Re:Related to the current poll ? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Anyone know what it is in elephants ?

      AFAIK, elephants don't burn - probably because the elephant gets annoyed and tramples you.

    31. Re:Related to the current poll ? by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

    32. Re:Related to the current poll ? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Hey, hey, hey! Don't forget ~4679.67 degrees Rankine!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    33. Re:Related to the current poll ? by g0at · · Score: 1

      While that's a good one, the more on-point question would be about the "on congress" that the 2 library apparently has.

    34. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anyone know what it is in elephants ?"

      African or Indian?

      There are two distinct species of African elephants, you insensitive clod!

    35. Re:Related to the current poll ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celsius is a SI DERIVED unit. All units are

  7. More like a shower of shrapnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the earth has water vaporizing from the oceans instead of salt, I would assume there would be an equivalent there. Since oxides and silicates tend to melt and vaporize at temperatures higher than metallic elements, it might be metallic rain. Which cooling and falling would end up a very unpleasant form of shrapnel.

    1. Re:More like a shower of shrapnel by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      The infantry stands
      And holds out its hands
      The marshal's binoculars focus and skyward they train
      They're searching the yonder blue
      They look out for number two
      The heraldry of the pencil rain

  8. Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It was on HBO a while ago! The planet is Crematoria. duhh..!

    1. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill the Riddick!

  9. In related news... by Spencerian · · Score: 1

    US Fidelis is setting up its new headquarters here for all the car warranty repairs they'll get from the new space colony there.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:In related news... by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.

      "I hold you the duty I was dangerous as I recover you he" ...???

    2. Re:In related news... by Spencerian · · Score: 1

      It's what happens when you think your online English-to-Latin translator works sufficiently. :)

      It should come out as "You knew the job was dangerous when you took it."

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  10. Do we send the religious fundamentalists there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, do we send the religious fundamentalists there, or what?

    1. Re:Do we send the religious fundamentalists there? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they wouldn't be able to stand the constant rock music drumming on the roof.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Do we send the religious fundamentalists there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just you.

    3. Re:Do we send the religious fundamentalists there? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Depends on the flavor of the religion you are talking about. Those of us with a Pentecostal background rather enjoy rock music

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Do we send the religious fundamentalists there? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      according to them, that's where the rest of us will end up.

  11. Rock Rainbows? by MarkRose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given that different material will have different melting temperatures, that should lead to the different metals coalescing at different heights. At sunset, there ought to be a layering affect as the last rocks fall back to the surface, a rock rainbow in effect. Of course, it probably won't last long with the whole planet being molten.

    --
    Be relentless!
    1. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Gotung · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to rain on your rainbow parade, but any planet that close to its star is likely tidally locked.

      So no sunset.

    2. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would also observe that "molten rock" is not famous for its transparency, let alone "gaseous rock". It may be an "atmosphere", but there won't be anybody observing any sort of "rainbow". The word "atmosphere" may be deceptive in this context; think less "open sky" and more "sea of blindingly hot lava so hot it's gaseous, not that you have any reason to care about this distinction".

    3. Re:Rock Rainbows? by ArcadiaAlex · · Score: 0

      If you read the arictle you may notice that the planet doesn't get a sunset due to it having a captured rotation:

      From the article:
      "it is so close to its sun that its orbit is like the Moon around Earth. One face is always pointed towards its sun."

      ie no sunset - sorry

    4. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to rain on your rainbow parade, but any planet that close to its star is likely tidally locked. So no sunset.

      In fact TFA suggests it is tidally locked. But if you were living at the terminus you would have perpetual sunset.

    5. Re:Rock Rainbows? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      What if the life forms are made of gaseous lava? Around Earth surface temperature, I can see the arguments for most life forms being carbon based (though I've heard silicon could have similar properties.)

      But at high-energy states like that, it's kind of absurd to begin theorizing about what would or wouldn't be damaging to a life form that evolved in that environment.

    6. Re:Rock Rainbows? by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      What if the life forms are made of gaseous lava? Around Earth surface temperature, I can see the arguments for most life forms being carbon based (though I've heard silicon could have similar properties.)

      But at high-energy states like that, it's kind of absurd to begin theorizing about what would or wouldn't be damaging to a life form that evolved in that environment.

      I hope somebody figures out a way to damage them before the Colour from Out of Space consumes us all.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    7. Re:Rock Rainbows? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      What's that in reference to? At first glance I thought you were referring to this.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:Rock Rainbows? by spun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To this, let me just "add" that "overuse" of "quotation marks" is "annoying." I can almost "picture" you making the "air quotes" with your "fingers."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    9. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Jeian · · Score: 1

      Not to rain rocks on your rainbow parade

      Fixed.

    10. Re:Rock Rainbows? by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      It is tidally locked according to the article linked in the article: "Because the planet is so close to the star, it is gravitationally locked to it in the same way the Moon is locked to Earth. One side of the planet always faces its star, just as one side of the Moon always faces Earth. "

    11. Re:Rock Rainbows? by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess what GP was talking about, I'd say this. First thing that I thought of, anyway.

    12. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Lucidus · · Score: 1

      "The Color Out of Space" is a 1927 short story by H.P. Lovecraft. Well worth reading, if you like that sort of thing.

    13. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a tide-locked planet, it's always sunset on the terminator.

    14. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To this, let me just add, that low UID trolls are still trolls.

    15. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day when global-warming-evolved humans visit the planet on vacation they will surely disagree with you and confirm the beauty of that rainbow.

    16. Re:Rock Rainbows? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      If it's so opaque, wouldn't it be colder near the surface since no light would get there? Then how would the surface vaporise? Maybe in cycles? Or maybe there could be a permanent lava cloud cover that would keep the surface cold enough to not vaporise?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    17. Re:Rock Rainbows? by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Lucidus is correct, it's an H.P. Lovecraft reference. The story is about a life form of unknown but presumably gaseous nature which sucks the life out of things. It comes in a meteor, hence the name.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    18. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      So... you just have to find a nice spot near the terminator line and you can have a perpetual sunset/sunrise, rainbows and all, right?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about damaging to any life forms that evolved there? It doesn't matter, there isn't any sensory data available that will allow seeing anything like we see here.

      Besides, it is possible to theorize about what life forms could exist there. If you agree that for any definition of life that is useful, it must be able to perform some computation (in a physical sense) that allows it to stay ahead of entropy, then information theory has a lot to say about what conditions life could exist in. High temperatures have too much entropy for any conceivable process to overcome them. While life on Earth itself demonstrates that we are not necessarily at the top end of the possible temperature scale, you're not going to see life in molten rock or in a star. There aren't any processes that could remove entropy from a system faster than the local environment is shoving it in, so therefore, no meaningful information-rich structure can survive.

      Very high heat environments are not the places to be looking for life.

    20. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it's tidal locked there will still be a terminator and thus conditions that look like a sunset.

    21. Re:Rock Rainbows? by AdeBaumann · · Score: 1

      Of course there is. Even a permanent sunset. You just need to be in the right place.

      --
      I gave up sigs almost a year ago.
    22. Re:Rock Rainbows? by lxs · · Score: 1

      That goes for any planet.

      Unless you're on the side of the terminator where it's always sunrise, on which side you are would be difficult to determine on a planet in tidal lock however.

    23. Re:Rock Rainbows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me there would be a stationary "sunset" around a circular band on the back side of the planet, and that precipitation might be heaviest there. Since the planet is so close to its star, I'd imagine that that light would fall on much of the "backside." I leave it to someone else to calculate how little of the planet's surface is exposed to its sun's light.

  12. Hail? How is this different? by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

    Having parked under a tree during a hailstorm, how is this different from something as solid as hail raining down on you?

    Ice is pretty solid and it's created by pretty much the same phenomenon as the pebbles in this planet. All you need is a temperature range between solid to gas of a substance and a rotation speed slow enough to cool the other side by radiation.

    But I'm not going to shout down any scientist who's spent enough time to measure the spectra, do the math about temperatures and conclude this ... because science is good.

    So, rock ON! :)

    1. Re:Hail? How is this different? by maharb · · Score: 1

      Just in case you wanted confirmation: You are exactly right, it is 100% the same effect just using different compounds. Cool to think about until you realize that it is exactly like hail and that the rock rain melts just like hail and ... well it is just rock hail.

  13. Ok now I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought we had hard water!

  14. Why were you late for school? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Teacher: Why are you late?
    Student 1: I was throwing pebbles in the pond.
    Teacher: (to student #2) Why are you late?
    Student 2: I was throwing pebbles in the pond.
    Teacher: (to student #3) Let me guess - you were throwing pebbles in the pond too?
    Student 3: I'm Pebbles.

    1. Re:Why were you late for school? by jlintern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Teacher: Why are you late? Student 1: I was on top of Cherry Hill. Teacher: (to student #2) Why are you late? Student 2: I was on top of Cherry Hill. Teacher: (to student #3) Let me guess - you were on Cherry Hill too? Student 3: I'm Cherry.

    2. Re:Why were you late for school? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      I've always heard this one:

      Teacher: Why are you late?
      Student 1: I was blowing bubbles.
      Teacher: (to student #2) Why are you late?
      Student 2: I was blowing bubbles.
      Teacher: (to student #3) Let me guess - you were blowing bubbles too?
      Student 3: I'm Bubbles.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    3. Re:Why were you late for school? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      So Pebbles got BamBammed?

    4. Re:Why were you late for school? by J053 · · Score: 1

      These 3 ducks had to go to court. The Judge asked the first duck, "What's your name?" "Quack" "And why are you here?" "I was blowing bubbles in the pond". "Thirty days. Next case". The Judge asked the next duck, "What's your name?" "Quack Quack" "And why are you here?" "I was blowing bubbles in the pond". "Thirty days. Next case". The judge said to the third duck, "I suppose your name is Quack Quack Quack?" "No, I'm Bubbles".

    5. Re:Why were you late for school? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      "I got really pissed last night, and ended up blowing Chunks."

      "That's not so bad, we all do that from time to-"

      "No, you don't understand - Chunks is my dog."

  15. 50% chance of rocking out! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is nearly impossible to imagine a deluge of pebbles falling from the sky, or turning on the morning forecast to hear reports of "rocking" instead of "raining."

    Oh I can imagine it. You see dark clouds roll in, crowding around. In the distance but growing louder, the rapid heavy percussion of the rock shower begins. Then in the cloud at the front, you see a flash of light and a shower of sparks like a pyrotechnic burst. Seconds later, instead of a crash of thunder, you hear the wail of an electric guitar.

    It is now rocking. Rocking hard core.

    This is the awesomest planet ever.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Dethklok needs to record their next record there.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Heh, I can imagine Nathan Explosion's voice after he reads the article.

      "We have to record our next album there. It's the most brutal planet ever."

      And of course they'd inexplicably have an enormous interstellar spaceship shaped like a Viking ship and covered in spikes.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by snoig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be a Hotblack Desiato concert.

    4. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by xonar · · Score: 1

      ...Seconds later, instead of a crash of thunder, you hear the wail of an electric guitar.

      It is now rocking. Rocking hard core.

      This is the awesomest planet ever.

      Robert Hamburger, is that you?

    5. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      And of course they'd inexplicably have an enormous interstellar spaceship shaped like a Viking ship and covered in spikes.

      Wïth löts öf ümläüts!

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    6. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Dude! If their simulations predict that there are ninjas on this planet, I'm going to demand NASA abandon their stupid Mars or Moon plans and head straight for COROT-7b. And take me with them. Who's with me?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      And of course they'd inexplicably have an enormous interstellar spaceship shaped like a Viking ship and covered in spikes.

      Wïth löts öf ümläüts!

      (Bëcäüsë ümläüts cän mäkë änythïng bädäss...)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:50% chance of rocking out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the tropical zones, you get storms that...

      Rock you like a hurricane.

  16. Solid precipitation and dinnerplate planets by SMoynihan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having read TFA, I am interested why the authors hypothesise that the precipitation is as solid rocks. Intuitively, it would make more sense that it would be in a liquid phase (while I have no idea of what pressures would exist on the planet, and am no geologist, liquid rocks seem to exist across temperature ranges in excess of 100's of degrees here on earth.) Admittedly, the article does seems to imply that there is no rotation of the planet, and thus gaseous rock migrating to the super-cold side might (possibly) precipitate rapidly. In fact, would this imply that there is a large scale migration of rock from the sunward side of the planet to that opposed to the sun (and would this in turn alter the fundamental planet shape? I envisage dinnerplate planets...)

    1. Re:Solid precipitation and dinnerplate planets by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would expect that the elements/molecules with higher melting points would migrate to the sunward side, while more volatile stuff would end up in the shadows. Would you have something like a "shield" of aluminum oxide guarding an ocean of iron?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Solid precipitation and dinnerplate planets by radtea · · Score: 1

      n fact, would this imply that there is a large scale migration of rock from the sunward side of the planet to that opposed to the sun (and would this in turn alter the fundamental planet shape? I envisage dinnerplate planets...)

      I briefly entertained the same fantasy--I even wondered if this could destablize the tidal locking by transporting mass from the point closest to the sun to more distant points, which on reflection seems highly unlikely.

      It is possible that the processes described in the article result in a bit of a flat spot close to the star and a mountainous bulge of scree along the terminator, but with lava to transport molten rock across the surface, and rock being pretty plastic at such high temperatures anyway, it is unlikely that anything so extreme as a dinner-plate shape could take form, which is a damned shame.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Solid precipitation and dinnerplate planets by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless the planet is very small, no matter where or how you move material around, it's going to return to a roughly spherical shape, regardless. In fact, a big part of the definition of "planet" is some mass large enough that gravity forces it into a sphere.

      Now, you could imagine a planet where this front-to-back migration actually stirs the planet. That would be cool.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  17. Obligatory S*P reference by emurphy42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ROCKS FALL! EVERYONE DIES!

  18. cats & dogs..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At what temperature do cats and dogs vaporize ?

    1. Re:cats & dogs..... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      At what temperature do cats and dogs vaporize ?

      I asked Dr. Schrödinger, but he keeps giving me different answers.
         

  19. Fallout by mbone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That has happened on Earth too. We call it Fallout.

    I am not kidding. A surface nuclear burst in the megaton range will vaporize millions of tons of rock and soil. This material will cool, condense, and and fall as
    little pebbles or hail. In this case, it's radioactive, but otherwise the physics is the same.

    1. Re:Fallout by mk_is_here · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To enjoy a natural one, without the radioactive waste, all you need is a volcano eruption.

    2. Re:Fallout by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      That has happened on Earth too. We call it Fallout.

      I am not kidding. A surface nuclear burst in the megaton range will vaporize millions of tons of rock and soil. This material will cool, condense, and and fall as little pebbles or hail. In this case, it's radioactive, but otherwise the physics is the same.

      Really? *Millions* of tons? I would be surprised if it even vaporized hundreds of tons. I don't know, I'm not a nuclear physicist, but the craters I've seen in Nevada look like they're in the dozens of tons range, from high kiloton explosions. If anyone has more specific numbers I'd love to know about it.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Fallout by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The average dump truck has a load capacity of about twenty five metric tonnes. If the craters you've seen could be filled in by one tipper truck, I humbly suggest that they were not created by high-yield nuclear weapons.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Fallout by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      It's also possible that I'm a terrible judge of large weights and volumes.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:Fallout by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Rock is surprisingly heavy.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    6. Re:Fallout by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly heavy? Why, I always used rock to pad my laptop bag. I'll try another material tomorrow; maybe quicksilver, that seems nice and soft.

    7. Re:Fallout by StrategicIrony · · Score: 1

      This post made me LOL :-)

      thanks!

    8. Re:Fallout by city · · Score: 1

      I remember the ash from Mt St Helens in our driveway as a kid. It wasn't as exciting/fatal as getting hit with "showers of pebbles", but still pretty cool.

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
  20. I don't wanna be there in the winter... by Necroloth · · Score: 1
    wow... rains pebbles?! I really don't wanna be there when it snows! ... scrap that, if it rains pebbles, what the heck is it's version of hailstones?!

    hrmm, I knew this tritanium umbrella will come in handy one day

  21. tholians by joejor · · Score: 1

    seems like a good place for stone base life forms to develop

    1. Re:tholians by idontgno · · Score: 1
      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:tholians by Ironweaver · · Score: 1

      You just quoted a Horta. Tholians were completely different

  22. That's hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very hot.

  23. Meanwhile on COROT-7b by JohnHegarty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Meanwhile on COROT-7b scientists find a new planet so cold that water would actually create "oceans" on the surface , and even freeze at the poles.

    They laugh at the though ever existing on that planet.

    1. Re:Meanwhile on COROT-7b by iprefermuffins · · Score: 5, Funny

      t of life

      Here, you dropped this.

    2. Re:Meanwhile on COROT-7b by city · · Score: 1

      wow, i dnidt ntcioe it was mnisisg uintl you siad sinmhoteg

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
    3. Re:Meanwhile on COROT-7b by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      There's life there? I, for one, welcome our fire-breathing, hard-headed overlords.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    4. Re:Meanwhile on COROT-7b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "so cold that rock would actually create" rather than "water".

      We get water creating oceans here on Earth.

  24. Reality Stranger than Fiction by gpronger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My first reaction was that this (assuming the theory is correct) is about as cool of a discovery - concept I've read about in a long time. At the same time it brings to point a thought that one of the problems with popular Sci-Fi is that it misses on potential of "stuff" "out-there" (space) being wilder and different (including life) than we've yet to imagine.

    If you consider the variety of habitats that we find life in our tiny part of the cosmos (Earth) and that life keeps being discovered in more and bizarre places (by human standards) when you extrapolate that out, I tend to think it may be literally beyond our imagination.

    If we, by whatever means, met intelligent life, would we be able to communicate; sure math is universal, but consider the issues communicating ideas and values across cultures when its the same species. Consider a collective consciousness, what does the term "I" or "me" mean to it (them).

    1. Re:Reality Stranger than Fiction by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      thats why, when i do artwork of space, i imagine that anything i make, exists, somewhere in the universe. there's an awful lot of universe out there, and everything points to it being full of really interesting things to look at.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    2. Re:Reality Stranger than Fiction by Noren · · Score: 1

      At the same time it brings to point a thought that one of the problems with popular Sci-Fi is that it misses on potential of "stuff" "out-there" (space) being wilder and different (including life) than we've yet to imagine.

      So, uh, they should write about things no one has imagined yet? Nice trick, that would be. There are "out-there" hard science fiction novels (e.g. Dragon's Egg) but they're usually not popular.

    3. Re:Reality Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would we be able to communicate; sure math is universal

      I always wondered how that would work. Sure, math is universal, but what can you tell with it except more math?
      How do you turn all those equations into "Hi, we're sentient, let's trade or shit"?

  25. Really? by swanzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTA:

    It is nearly impossible to imagine a deluge of pebbles falling from the sky, or turning on the morning forecast to hear reports of âoerockingâ instead of âoeraining.â

    Does this seem difficult to imagine, let alone nearly impossible?
    Imagine, if you can, something somewhere else very similar to something standard here!

    1. Re:Really? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Woah! You just blew my mind!

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - And here's Ollie wih the weather..

      - It rocks!

      - Thanks, Ollie.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm imagining a fleet of B-52s loaded to the gills with 1" steel bearings. And dropping them all over some poor village in somethingistan. It's like carpet bombing without the explosives.
       
      yes, I know this isn't what you were referring to, but it's still kinda awesome to imagine.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the people in question have never been to the Middle East... it rains pebbles there all the time. We call them sand storms (Not to mention volcanoes)

    5. Re:Really? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      ... they actually sort of used to do that. only they used flechettes, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flechette dump buckets of em over enemy trenches from planes.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  26. Rocks are for the weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rocks!? Pshhhhh. Our solar system brings the bling bling out when it rains. http://www.spacedaily.com/news/carbon-99d.html

  27. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I hear there's this awesome planet were you can get really stoned...
    Duuude!

  28. Titinians say the same thing about Earth by SloWave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure the methane based party animals on Titan also point to Earth and oooh and aaah about how solid H2O actually melts, vaporizes, and falls from the sky as rain, hail, and snow under the tremendous heat we have here.

    1. Re:Titinians say the same thing about Earth by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Is everything on Titan made of titanium?

    2. Re:Titinians say the same thing about Earth by captainClassLoader · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course! Everything is made of Uranium on uranus, of Plutonium on Pluto, and Titanium on Titan. And Hafnium on the planet Haf, but that hasn't been discovered yet.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    3. Re:Titinians say the same thing about Earth by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      on Titan also point to Earth and oooh and aaah about how solid H2O actually melts, vaporizes...

      And we rub it in further by singing, "ring around the planet, ring around the planet, oh those dirty rings!"
           

    4. Re:Titinians say the same thing about Earth by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I'll bet Mercury smells nice because of all that myrrh

  29. it's not the heat, its the humidty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not that bad, because it is a dry heat

  30. 4220 deg F = 2600 K by AniVisual · · Score: 1

    For those who do not have a good feel of Fahrenheit temperatures over 100.

    1. Re:4220 deg F = 2600 K by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure people have a good feel of how hot 2600 K is, either ;)

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  31. Let's not exaggerate by slyborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some hyperbole here.

    The Castle Bravo test shot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Bravo) was one of the largest thermonuclear detonations ever, with an estimated yield of 15-22 MT. The blast crater from Bravo was 2000m in diameter and 75m deep. Assuming it was square because I'm too lazy for math today, that's about 300,000 cubic meters. Assuming that this was blasted in solid granite (http://www.allmeasures.com/Formulae/static/materials/32/density.htm) you get about 780k metric tons.

    However, most of this material wasn't vaporized, it was pulverized by the shock wave and propelled as a solid into the mushroom cloud. The actual quantity of material melted I wouldn't hazard to estimate, but it was a small proportion of the overall material excavated.

    Much as in the "it's raining rocks!" planet, this precipitation would be much closer in form to dust, not "pebbles". One of the reason that water on earth comes in larger forms is that the water molecule has a charge, and will aggregate electrostatically. I don't think that would be true of this silicate cloud.

    1. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an even larger detonation than the Castle Bravo shot (15-22 megatons). The Tzar Bomba detonation by the Soviets (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tzar_bomba) at 50 megatons was more than 2-3 times as powerful. With a blast 10 times as powerful as all the bombs dropped in WWII, a shock wave that circled the earth 3 times and blew out windows in Norway, I do not recall ever reading anywhere that it caused rocks to rain. If the "bomba" can't do it, no bomb can.

    2. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually a 75m section of a 2000m cylinder, from pi * r^2 * depth comes out at about 200 MILLION cubic metres. Multiply that by about two metric tonnes per cubic metre (sandstone) and you get four hundred million metric tonnes. I can't be bothered to account for the curvature of the crater, but I doubt it'll bring that down much under a hundred million tonnes. There's still the "vapourisation versus excavation" question, of course, I'm just pointing out that your estimate of mass is off by three orders of magnitude.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From underground nuclear tests, the "melt cavity" created by vaporization of rock and the flow of liquefied rock is about 2000 cubic metres per kiloton, so the OP's estimate is about right, assuming one half of the energy is lost to the air by a surface explosion.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is actually some tendency for silicate dust to aggregate electrostatically, but its orders of magnitude lower than water's quirky nature.

    5. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True (about the rain aggregation) but one of the reasons we get hail is that ice crystals get blow back up into the layer of freezing water vapor and collect more ice crystals on the surface. Wash, rinse, repeat and you get big balls of ice. i would think that if this planet had an atmosphere it would have tremendous winds.
      Bring a steel umbrella.

    6. Re:Let's not exaggerate by bcmm · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Tsar Bomba was an airburst, although the 5-mile-wide fireball did (just) make contact with the ground. Castle Bravo was a groundburst. There is rock on the ground, but not in the air.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    7. Re:Let's not exaggerate by EvilBudMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      --Assuming it was square because I'm too lazy for math today, that's about 300,000 cubic meters.--

      Area of a circle = pi * diameter

      A = 3.14159 * 2000M
      A = 6283.18sqM

      Volume = Depth * Area

      V = 75M * 6283.18sqM
      V = 471238.5 Cubic Meters

      So you are off a little there. About 36% off I would guess, and there is that doomsday weapon buried somewhere.

    8. Re:Let's not exaggerate by slyborg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was even lazier than I thought :/ You're right, its more like 300 megatons using my approximation.

    9. Re:Let's not exaggerate by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      There is rock on the ground, but not in the air.

      Surely this new astronomical finding forces us to reassess that assumption? :p

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  32. Weather Report... by DigitalPasture · · Score: 1

    Today... 50% chance of pebble storm in the morning. Evening; 30% chance of magma flood.

  33. Re:first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    bite it noobs

    forgot to check the AC box? noob!

  34. Haven't you learned an by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the temperature on its sun-facing side is around 4220 degrees Fahrenheit.

    Doesn't the poll show that most people in the world use Celsius?

  35. Re:Wow What a Nigger! by hardburn · · Score: 1

    How did "post worthless crap on slashdot" not make the top of this list?

    --
    Not a typewriter
  36. Some assumptions... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    Minerals melt and boil at various temperatures and at 2,370 C most minerals will probably break down into smaller molecules and atoms. Since Silicon dioxide (quartz) is a stable and common component of various kinds of rocks, and it has a boiling point of 2,230 C, I suspect that the surface is a sea of melted and boiling quartz and that most of the "atmosphere" is gaseous quarts, and that the "rain" is droplets of liquid quartz. Aluminum oxide melts at 2072C and boils at 2,980C, so the "ocean" is probably a mixture of the two minerals. 2,370C is enough to boil Silicon but not Aluminum. http://www.science.co.il/PTelements.asp?s=BP

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  37. Non-migratory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you suggesting that molecules migrate? Or were they on a strand of crepon held under the dorsal guiding feathers of a European Swallow?

    1. Re:Non-migratory by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this case, yes. The planet would be tidal locked, due to its proximity to the sun. Less volatile components would be the first to boil off into a gaseous state. There would be a "wind" that carries the gaseous components around to the shadowed side of the planet, where it would cool and fall. Repeat for a few million years, and you'd have a nice stratisfication based on volatililty (or lack thereof).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  38. I'm Singing in the OW! OW! by wiredog · · Score: 5, Funny

    ow!

  39. A more informative writeup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  40. geologist's hot dating destination? by polishphorce · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and if you like pina coladas and getting bludgeoned in the rain...

  41. talk about not wanting to be outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    either that or I would need to have a stronger umbrella

  42. Conveyor-belt planet by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I find interesting about this planet is that it's tidally locked with it's star, so one side is over 4000F, while the other is -370F. That could imply that the surface continuously evaporates on the hot side and condenses out of the atmosphere on the cold side. So the planet is essentially a conveyor belt always in the process of being destroyed and created. The contents of the entire planet could have gone through this process many times already.

    1. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by happy_place · · Score: 1

      I thought of this too. WOuldn't it also imply that as the vaporized rocks made their way around to the cold side of the planet, and then formed into precipitation of snow (pebbles) and rain (lava) that it was slowly creeping away from its sun?

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    2. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      The other interesting question might be what sort of shape might a planet take on when it's continuously evaporating on one side and sublimating on the other. Maybe the planet takes on an egg shape if the sublimation only occurs at the coldest point on the planet. Or maybe bowl-shaped if the sublimation occurs as soon as the evaporated rock reaches the shadow side of the planet.

    3. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find interesting about this planet is that it's tidally locked with it's star, so one side is over 4000F, while the other is -370F.

      So what you're saying is that it's a cosmic McDLT. Makes you wonder if this Ronald McDonald guy is really just a fast food mascot or if he's actually some kind of space traveler with horrible fashion sense. Ronald McDoctor?

    4. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, because it's still a closed system. The solid contents of the planet are continually moving towards the sun (the freshly-deposited rock is always pushing the older rock towards the hot side via gravity) But the overall center of gravity of the planet never changes position relative to the star since the momentum of the solid part of the planet is counteracted by the momentum of the atmosphere moving in the opposite direction. So the planet itself always stays the same distance away from the star.

    5. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      So the planet is essentially a conveyor belt always in the process of being destroyed and created. The contents of the entire planet could have gone through this process many times already.

      This is how you get real estate agents interested in astronomy. This planet just keeps making new land!

    6. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is pretty cool actually.

    7. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 3, Informative

      BTW....this is related to the process that is thought to occur on most tidally-locked rocky planets. They likely do not have atmospheres, since it entirely sublimates on to the cold side of the planet. When the atmosphere freezes out on the cold side, it reduces the atmospheric pressure on the cold side, which causes the atmosphere on the hot side to flow to the cold side, repeating the process until the entire atmosphere is gone. But in this particular case, the 'atmosphere' is getting continuously replaced through evaporation of the planet itself. This process is also one of the reasons why planets around red dwarf stars may be unlikely, since the planet has to be close to the star to receive enough energy from it, but being that close to the star increases the likely-hood of it becoming tidally locked with the star.

    8. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that apparently there are some minerals and metals that will remain solid even on the equator of the side locked nearest to the sun. Combine this with the possibility of having active plate tectonics (the thermal imbalance alone would put a lot of stress on the crust, leading to fractures and movement) which would tend to either move the sublimated material back into "day side" or re-absorbed into the mantle, and it's possible that this world would be more spherical than Earth.

      Most people don't realize this but Earth is slightly "squashed" because the angular momemntum of its rotation tends to move magma to the Equator more than the Poles. This in turn causes the equatorial regions to expand beyond a perfect sphere and the poles "collaspe" (very slightly) towards the core. Of course, this effect is very small compared to the total size of the Earth, the section of the Wikipeadia article I linked to states that Earth's devation from a true sphere (0.17%) is less than the devation acceptable for commerically manufactured billard balls(0.22%)!

    9. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the planet would sort of act as a giant refinery, and after a few hundred million years all the minerals with lower melting points would be on the cold side, and all the minerals with higher melting points would be on the hot side?

    10. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      good lord what stays solid at those temperatures? inquiring minds need to know!

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is debate about the assumed inevitability of atmospheric loss by condensation on the shady side. Red, Willing and Able, by Ken Croswell Originally published in New Scientist, January 2001.

    12. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by slashqwerty · · Score: 1

      good lord what stays solid at those temperatures? inquiring minds need to know!

      4220F = 2600K. The following elements (with associated melting points) would all remain solid at those temperatures.

      • Carbon (3825K)
      • Niobium (2742K)
      • Molybdenum (2896K)
      • Ruthenium (2610K)
      • Tantalum (3293K)
      • Tungsten (3695K)
      • Rhenium (3455K)
      • Osmium (3300K)
      • Iridium (2720K)

      ...and that is all the known atomic elements that would remain solid. It's possible elements 99+ may remain solid but Kalzium doesn't have their melting points and it's doubtful they would occur in nature anyway. It is, however, quite likely many alloys and compounds could remain solid as well.

    13. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem that the mass of the planet will increase on the dark side and could make its tidal lock unstable but you'd also have to assume, being so close to its parent star, allot of the planets material is being blown away into space gradually making it too small for any instability to alter its inevitable demise.

    14. Re:Conveyor-belt planet by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "...and that is all the known atomic elements that would remain solid. It's possible elements 99+ may remain solid but Kalzium doesn't have their melting points and it's doubtful they would occur in nature anyway."

      Hmmm...but if the planet was that close to the star, wouldn't it also be bombarded constantly with an enormous amount of high energy particles? And isn't that how we "make" the transuranics?

      Or even better, if the elements condense differentially, that would deposit uranium in nearly pure formations, which might lead to criticality?

      So we have a planet that is the Biblical Hell on one side, Dante's Inferno on the other, and periodically a significant portion of Dante's side blows itself up?

      I want to go there sooooo bad! (And why do I have this sudden urge to rent High Plains Drifter?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  43. FYI, about Kelvin by testman123 · · Score: 1

    Right, Kelvin is the unit. Kelvin is historically nothing but celcius with only positive numbers. IE, 0K is an absolute zero temperature nothing is colder than that.

    Looking at translation formulae make it clear :

    degree C = K - 273,15
    degree F = K Ã-- 1,8 â' 459,67.

    The original scientist post states it "a temperature of about 2600 degrees Kelvin (4220 degrees Fahrenheit)." Noting that corot satelite was "launched by the French and European space agencies" we would have expected as in the original blog : source unit (SI country and continent) and then "translated unit" (here the imperial unit Farenheit).

    The source unit is the rela value. The translated unit is here to help non native users to understand the value.

    Can slashdoters try to use SI units when they make a post putting next to the number the american value (as we are on a US based server) ?

    I think this make sense : helps people to feel comfortable with SI and keep people reference with old system.

    By the way, citing wikipedia "Only three countries (Burma (Myanmar), Liberia, and the United States) have yet to adopt the International System of Units" ... well Burma and Liberia ... with USA ? Ey guys are you sleeping or what ;-)

    Bythe way bis, Slashdot it is realy time to use unicode UTF-8 compatible !!!!! I can not even post the degree sign :(

    1. Re:FYI, about Kelvin by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since Kelvin is indicated just by the K, no degree sign, there should be no need to post the degree sign. "Degrees Kelvin" is a misunderstanding of the system of units.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:FYI, about Kelvin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Kelvin is indicated just by the K, no degree sign, there should be no need to post the degree sign.

      Re-read his post and find "degree C" and "degree F".

    3. Re:FYI, about Kelvin by mmontour · · Score: 1

      Since Kelvin is indicated just by the K, no degree sign, there should be no need to post the degree sign. "Degrees Kelvin" is a misunderstanding of the system of units.

      To be even more pedantic, SI unit names are not capitalized even if they are derived from a person's name. The unit is "kelvin" and the symbol is "K".

  44. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'll ask the question no one else has: Are these Fruity Pebbles?

  45. There's also this planet where it rains iron.. by hallucinogen · · Score: 0

    Or so I've heard at an astrobiology class. Too lazy to check it out..

  46. Would those be.. by The+GIS+Guy · · Score: 1

    Cocoa or Fruity Pebbles?

  47. Crematoria by Chicken04GTO · · Score: 1

    He's thinkin' of a triple-max prison. A no-daylight slam. Only three of 'em left in this system, two of 'em outta range for a shitty little undercutter like this one with no legs. Leavin' just one - crematoria. That is what you had in mind. Right Toombs?

  48. Oops by justthinkit · · Score: 4, Informative
    The planet is tidally locked. Just stay on the dark side of the planet. The equilibrium temperature there is 59F -- not bad at all.

    This star-facing side has a temperature of about 2600 degrees Kelvin (4220 degrees Fahrenheit). That's infernally hothot enough to vaporize rocks. The global average temperature of Earth's surface, in contrast, is only about 288 degrees Kelvin (59 degrees Fahrenheit).

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Oops by Rei · · Score: 1

      My apolgies -- I copied the wrong number (50K instead of 59F). Nonetheless, there's going to be some band between thousands of degrees kelvin and 50 degrees kelvin that is habitable.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    2. Re:Oops by Gerzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but how big is it? Without Atmosphere it can get very small to basically non existent.

    3. Re:Oops by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess - based on no knowledge whatsoever - I'd say less than half a kilometre.

    4. Re:Oops by calavicci · · Score: 1

      2600K isn't even CLOSE to hot enough to "vaporize" rock. The binding energies of the bonds are measured in eV or tens of eV; 2600K * k_B isn't even a quarter of an eV. Quartz doesn't even melt until ~1600K. Think about it for just a second - if it was hot enough to vaporize rock, what would be happening to the planet's surface over time?

    5. Re:Oops by calavicci · · Score: 1

      He was inquiring with regard to a /temperature range,/ not a geometrical dimension. Additionally, yes, that is based on no knowledge whatsoever: half a kilometer would be classified as a asteroid.

    6. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The planet is tidally locked. Just stay on the dark side of the planet. The equilibrium temperature there is 59F -- not bad at all.

      This star-facing side has a temperature of about 2600 degrees Kelvin (4220 degrees Fahrenheit). That's infernally hothot enough to vaporize rocks. The global average temperature of Earth's surface, in contrast, is only about 288 degrees Kelvin (59 degrees Fahrenheit).

      True, but the more detailed article at wustl.edu says that the dark side of COROT-7b is -369 degrees Fahrenheit, so it is nevertheless likely that in between there are temperate areas, perhaps small, on the planet.

    7. Re:Oops by plover · · Score: 1

      I think BikeHelmet meant that if the temperature ranged from 50K to 5000K from pole-to-equator, and was linear in temperature rise as you moved from the north pole southward, you would find a habitable band just slightly south of the pole that would extend from a too-cold northern border to a too-hot southern border, and that band would only be about 0.5 km.

      Or if the planet was tidally locked, you'd find the habitable band would be a band ringing the darker side of the shadow line that divides the diurnal areas from the nocturnal areas.

      Of course, habitable still implies there aren't rocks constantly falling from the sky, ruining your picnics and canceling all the plane flights.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Oops by Rei · · Score: 1

      Why are you talking about binding energies? They said the surface of the planet on the hot side is lava. There's minimal binding going on, apart from the occasional suspended crystal.

      2600K is hot enough to (on its own) outright boil helium, hydrogen, neon, nitrogen, fluorine, argon, oxygen, krypton, xenon, radon, chlorine, bromine, iodine, phosphorus, astatine, mercury, sulfur, arsenic, cesium, francium, selenium, rubidium, potassium, cadmium, sodium, zinc, polonium, tellurium, magnesium, ytterbium, lithium, strontium, thallium, calcium, radium, bismuth, antimony, europium, lead, samarium, barium, thulium, manganese, indium, silver, and tin. Add an extra 500 degrees for the occasional hot spot (which there almost certainly will be) and you also boil silicon, gallium, aluminum, dysprosium, copper, americium, chromium, holmium, nickel, iron, gold, germanium, scandium, erbium, cobalt, palladium, beryllium, terbium, and neodymium . And even what you can't boil outright, you can still vaporize due to the unevenness of individual particle energies (similar to how ice can still sublime at far below freezing). And some things that you may not be able to vaporize directly, such as carbon, may burn with the liberated oxygen, and some of the oxides will have lower boiling points than their raw elements (such as CO2 vs. carbon).

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
  49. Life.... by mrops · · Score: 1

    ... since this planet has Rocks and Vapors, Its plausible that it also has them in liquid form...

    With such dynamic environment... Is it possible that this planet has life the way we don't know it.

    Some really unique life form we can't imagine?

    1. Re:Life.... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      ... since this planet has Rocks and Vapors, Its plausible that it also has them in liquid form...

      Like lava? Yeah, TFA mentioned that several times. You read TFA, right?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  50. It must be a nightmare by popo · · Score: 1

    ..finding a safe place to park

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:It must be a nightmare by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Space is big,
      Space is dark,
      It's hard to find,
      A place to park.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  51. I guess.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess he will not be wearing a jacket either.

  52. I have but one question by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    does it rain Linux?

  53. Communication problems by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I always though that communication with alien life forms would be *far* more difficult that we expect.

    we cannot even communicate with insects, which would have a far simpler language than a sentient alien.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Communication problems by sean.peters · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the idea that communicating with alien life forms would be a lot harder than people think... I had to laugh at the next line. I'm pretty sure that insects don't have "language" at all - at least not in any reasonable definition of the term. There's simply not enough intellligence there.

    2. Re:Communication problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, depends on your definition of "language" I guess. Insects do emit and process messages: bees' "dances", ants' pheromone trails...

  54. Shower from Pebbles by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 0

    I got a shower from Pebbles one time. It cost $200. Pebbles was a stripper.

  55. 8/27/97 is kinda like 8/27/07 by SBrach · · Score: 1

    I don't even know if that qualifies as coincidental...

  56. Pebbles ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does 'Pebbles' got to do with anything ?

  57. This is your library... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... this is your library on Congress... any questions?

  58. note to self by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    Remember to park car in garage when visiting exoplanets.

    Seth

  59. Written by... by conureman · · Score: 1

    Dan Fogelberg.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    1. Re:Written by... by PunditGuy · · Score: 1

      A little like saying U2 for "Helter Skelter." Nice of the Beatles to cover Bono.

      Try "The Cascades."

    2. Re:Written by... by conureman · · Score: 1

      SORRY, I actually thought it was Ricky Nelson, but googled it to confirm and hit a bit of bad info on someone's fan site. Thanks.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  60. Not so bad by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    So, basically, It's like living in Oklahoma...

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  61. Pebble in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Asimov for the win!

  62. Why the long face, little bear? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To this, let me just add, that low UID trolls are still trolls.

    No we aren't. We're "offtopic" which never comes up for metamod, and thus shields the moderator from the presumed risk of modding us down, but does not effect our massive karma. But we don't get treated that way because we're better than you, it's simply because you aren't as good as us.

    But I wasn't even trying to "troll," this time. I was trying to make a "joke." "Sorry" to have "offended" you. I just think overuse of "quotation marks" is "hilarious."

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Why the long face, little bear? by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      "touche"

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  63. Gives a new meaning to "Chance of meatballs"... by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    and other things. I think this happens already in metal forges where metals that will evaporate at an lower temperature than other metals in the mix and form a layer on the cooler surfaces.

  64. Meanwhile, in a board room on COROT-7b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a select group of COROT-7bians gather for the hundred and forty sixth meeting of the "Why Did We Name Ourselves COROT-7b, Again?" panel.

  65. Monty Python's Life of Brian inspiration ... by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    Let's sent all the sinners to this planet.

  66. I beleive Bob Dylan has described life there by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    They`ll stone you when you`re trying to be so good
    They`ll stone you just like they said they would
    They`ll stone you when you`re trying to go home
    They`ll stone you when you`re there all alone
    But I would not feel so all alone
    Everybody must get stoned

    They`ll stone you when you`re walking on the street
    They`ll stone you when you`re trying to keep your seat
    They`ll stone you when your walking on the floor
    They`ll stone you when your walking to the door
    But I would not feel so all alone
    Everybody must get stoned

    They`ll stone you when you`re at the breakfast table
    They`ll stone you when you are young and able
    They`ll stone you when you`re trying to make a buck
    They`ll stone you and then they`ll say good luck
    But I would not feel so all alone
    Everybody must get stoned

    Well They`ll stone you and say that it`s the end
    They`ll stone you and then they`ll come back again
    They`ll stone you when you`re riding in your car
    They`ll stone you when you`re playing you guitar
    Yes But I would not feel so all alone
    Everybody must get stoned
    Alright

    Well They`ll stone you when you are all alone
    They`ll stone you when you are walking home
    They`ll stone you and then say they`re all brave
    They`ll stone you when you`re send down in your grave
    But I would not feel so all alone
    Everybody must get stoned

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  67. Showers of pepples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if it had showers of Cocoa Puffs...I'm so there.

  68. Seems like a new type of tectonics by mark_osmd · · Score: 1

    The rock vapor will move away from the sub stellar point towards the terminator and condense at some ring shaped region. Rock being a solid can't just flow back to the vaporization point (like a water ocean would) so it just piles up. At some point, the rock ring would get big enough to sink into the planet at the same rate that the rock dust is falling. Eventually material would be transported through the bulk of the planet by pressure rebalancing to evaporate again and the cycle would repeat. It might be possible that the rock ring and the void on the day side would throw the mass distribution off enough that the locking to the star would change angle after a while.

  69. Meh... by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    Just point me to the planet that rains donuts.

    mmmmmm... dooonuts

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  70. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The weather there will Rock you like a Hurricane.

  71. Neptune by yoyhed · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it rain diamonds on Neptune?

    --
    WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    1. Re:Neptune by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      that's a theory, that methane is broken down into hydrogen and diamonds at extreme depth, and that the release of gravitational potential energy from the diamonds falling inward is why Neptune radiates more than twice the energy it receives from the Sun. But other theories for Neptune's heat exist, including radioactivity in its core.

      But don't be disappointed if there aren't diamonds on Neptune, there's always BPM 37093 to think about: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3492919.stm

  72. If pebbles pile up too high, planet flips around? by Maow · · Score: 1

    Some interesting thoughts posted about nature of the "rain" - dust, pebbles, sand, liquid-filled crusty balls.

    I had the thought that if the precipitate isn't able to redistribute itself back to the hot side some how... Well, it *must*, eventually.

    So, what might happen - would the pebbles build a pile so high that it covered the entire cold side of the planet, with new debris sliding down the slopes back to the hot side?

    If the precipitate were liquid, it would flow down 'til cooling or reaching the hot side.

    If the debris precipitating from the sky were "sticky" enough to not flow, even as aggregate, and the pile on the cold side grew large enough, wouldn't gravity eventually cause the planet to "flip over", exposing the formerly cold side to the nearby star, beginning another round of rock vapourization?

    Anyone have thoughts on this?

    Cheers,

    rb

  73. Obl. Futurama quote by plams · · Score: 1

    (about the temperature on the moon)
    Farmer: Drops down to minus 173.
    Fry: Fahrenheit or Celsius?
    Farmer: First one, then the other.

  74. Awesome by Mattskimo · · Score: 1

    It rains food! You guys eat rocks, right? Not even if they're sautéed in a little mud?

  75. There by coryking · · Score: 1

    I caught it. Futurama. The rest of the lamers here didn't but I did. Where is my free internet cookie.

  76. MAGMA software info and some ideas by mattr · · Score: 1

    Here are some links I found to papers describing the software used.

    FWIW I am also intrigued about what is happening at this planet. I could imagine:
    - tremendous storms at the twilight zone, perhaps mixing in elements from the cold side, or maybe just spreading ash worldwide?
    - With the solar winds above and heat from below, it might be like a fluidized bed reactor with all kinds of things being created - all kinds of compounds. Falling gems indeed!
    - Solar wind buffeting the silica and other things in the atmosphere, could perhaps create spongy material, aerogels, glassy wings that whirl toward ground like maple seeds.
    - life possible? Maybe somewhere in the world..

    Okay. Use of the MAGMA software is described briefly in Fractional Vaporization of Hot Earth-like Exoplanets and a description of the algorithms and data used in the program are provided in
    L. Schaefer and B. Fegley. A Thermodynamic Model of High Temperature Lava Vaporization on Io, Icarus, 169, 216-241.

    Note that according to the abstract of Schaefer and Fegley's Vaporization of High Temperature Magmas on Io "Galileo NIMS observations indicate magmas with temperatures of 1700-2100K on Io. Vaporization of rock-forming oxides should occur at such temperatures. "

    Also Exploring the Environment of Volcanoes gives for Earth: 2000 degrees C: Iron-Rich Rock (i.e. still rock even while under tremendous pressure 500 miles underground), and 5000 degrees C: liquid iron
      (2900 miles underground).

    You may also be interested in Heavy Metal Frost on Venus
      and an overview of some of their research here.

    There is another program called CONDOR that Fegley and Lodders made, which is described on their site. (See condor2.html for algorithm info.) This program is for gaseous atmospheres.

  77. Obligatory Quote by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Yabba Dabba Doo!

    Evolution will progress from the Stone Age to the Stone Age to the Stone Age.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  78. God forbid by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    If the jetstream changed and the temp changed by an order of magnitude in either direction.

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  79. And so.. by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    ... if the surface is made of manure, it evaporates, condenses and comes down as...?

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  80. Gravel? Your exoplanet has GRAVEL? by aqk · · Score: 0

    Ahh. Thank you but- we certainly shan't grovel for your gravel!
    WE DO NOT WANT IT IT!
    But, Earthing- thanks for the hint about your exoplanet (whatever that is)
    Perhaps we'll look them over...