Would it be because of the influx of unaffected DNA with each new generation, as human tend to move around? Now, animals on the other hand all breed within the same (irradiated) area.
I wonder who approved this solution in a first case and whether it would be stricken down by another court? Because form the looks of things, we are still having an object in a page, except now it's generated not from the source code, but from Javascript code. I remember in older Netscape browsers text, generated by "document.write" command used to just show up as a straight source code if you do a "View Source".
If the reasoning was to exclude object creation from the source code, we still have an OBJECT statement, but it's inside of Javascript now. And court said that it makes the difference? WTF?!!
So, if I write a code that creates JPEG file, but saves it as a text file, with following renaming.TXT to.JPG, have I just avoided JPEG PATENT?
Google knew that they would be releasing a new GD version that will allow storing private information on Google servers when Feds asked for search logs. I think that Google refused (and made a big deal out of it by getting ready for a court) just to assure future users of new GD version that they will not be providing any stored data to government.
I will not be surprised, however if once users start using new Google Desktop data storage features widely, Google will just start complying with the gov requests.... Name one big public company that doesn't for a long run?
From the Googleblog: And yes, Chinese regulations will require us to remove some sensitive information from our search results. When we do so, we'll disclose this to users, just as we already do in those rare instances where we alter results in order to comply with local laws in France, Germany and the U.S.
Google has to restrict information to comply with US laws? Are there something I am missing?
I saw a comparative size of the Minerva, and it makes me wonder: with it being so small, couldn't they just fly 2 or 3 of them on board? You are already firing a rocket anyways!
Dont get me started on Centrino! When Intel itself calls the best feature of the system "well-advertised", andthe only differenceis that the system is using less power (because oflower clock speeds) and have a built-in wireless... And people still are willing to shell out 1.5K extra!
Many small software companies making old DOS programs for narrowly targeted user (courier companies, schedulers for barber shops, etc.) went down that path of requiring user to enter a special code every year to make software work. This code,of cause had to be purchased from the vendor annualy.
Small businesses to which such software was geared to were trying to beat those restrictions any way possible: changing system date, searching for hacks online (as soon as Internet came around), and SWITCHING to different software, which doesn't require annual subscribtion as soon as it was available on the market.
Any company,unless it is a monopoly as MS, will not succsede trying to get user to pay annually. As with MS,if they ever push this strategy on WinOS, it would be the final push for OSS switch for many of the users.
Slashdot Mirror
That's actually, ZERO Visitors, as you are not a visitor, but a host, so to say.
Just ask Zaphod Beeblebrox!
Would it be because of the influx of unaffected DNA with each new generation, as human tend to move around? Now, animals on the other hand all breed within the same (irradiated) area.
If the reasoning was to exclude object creation from the source code, we still have an OBJECT statement, but it's inside of Javascript now. And court said that it makes the difference? WTF?!!
So, if I write a code that creates JPEG file, but saves it as a text file, with following renaming .TXT to .JPG, have I just avoided JPEG PATENT?
Wow! Should health insurance companies cover porn therapy now?
Please mod up the parent!
Yes, but have you harmed a small cute dinosaur?
Then you just turn the PC case 180 degrees.
Google knew that they would be releasing a new GD version that will allow storing private information on Google servers when Feds asked for search logs. I think that Google refused (and made a big deal out of it by getting ready for a court) just to assure future users of new GD version that they will not be providing any stored data to government.
I will not be surprised, however if once users start using new Google Desktop data storage features widely, Google will just start complying with the gov requests.... Name one big public company that doesn't for a long run?
I hope I am wrong!
Google has to restrict information to comply with US laws? Are there something I am missing?
Please, tell me Firefly is next!
If we could ONLY get them to bring a "Firefly" back!
All that ink getting transferred you know where.... No, thanks!
Here we come! Better grow some fur!
Back to your pajamasnaughty boys!
This would explain why MS got a deal with Claria (former Gator), an annoying adware company.
I saw a comparative size of the Minerva, and it makes me wonder: with it being so small, couldn't they just fly 2 or 3 of them on board? You are already firing a rocket anyways!
Dont get me started on Centrino! When Intel itself calls the best feature of the system "well-advertised", andthe only differenceis that the system is using less power (because oflower clock speeds) and have a built-in wireless... And people still are willing to shell out 1.5K extra!
screw his development! as soon as he can come up with viable flying cars!
It's called a power switch!
Once you fleep it "off", you can be sure your system is safe!
-40 degrees Celsius = -40 degrees Fahrenheit
Oh, wait... what was your point?
Small businesses to which such software was geared to were trying to beat those restrictions any way possible: changing system date, searching for hacks online (as soon as Internet came around), and SWITCHING to different software, which doesn't require annual subscribtion as soon as it was available on the market.
Any company,unless it is a monopoly as MS, will not succsede trying to get user to pay annually. As with MS,if they ever push this strategy on WinOS, it would be the final push for OSS switch for many of the users.
...when one of Microsoft=hosted sites will be /.ed. That will be chears!
Well... if MS ever implements it... the idea has been mentioned here first! (With GPL of cause!)
Would it mean that the new releases of MSOffice would have Thesaurus referencing literature works for the examples of word usage?