The EU likes censorship a lot and wants control over publication, images, cartoons, memes, political comments, links, art, culture, history, reviews, news.
The USA gives people freedom of speech and freedom after speech. Freedom of the press.
Police have been going undercover for many years all over the USA.
What is so special about social media?
Why should criminals and illegal immigrants feel free on social media?
Law enforcement groups should be all over social media all over the USA.
Why should any company "rules" protect people from their nations police?
Social media is a utility that connects people. Is social media now the "publisher"/"owner" of peoples comments, links, video clips?
What does social media want to be? Have total legal control over everything in users accounts?
That would make social media the "publisher" of a lot of peoples work, video clips, links, art... crime?
Perhaps social media should stay as a utility connecting people.. Users who are responsible for their own content and crimes.
Its time for a German all-electric subcompact.
With map pockets, ashtrays, carpeting, vanity mirror and flower vase.
Powered by new battery cells. Russian nickel imports too.
Re " Capitalism has failed"
Thats what's makes US capitalism so good at producing the products and services the world wants.
The freedom to try something, see if it works, sell and make a profit. The try someone th new again. Fail and start again.
Its not like the UK with strong regulation and laws about who can try what.
A France and Germany where once the "brand"/"company" is approved and established it "has" to look after its full time workers.
Nations outside the USA keep regulations on starting a company, what can be done once a company is approved. Thats huge costs before making any profit.
The truth for the EU is awakening. People want the freedom, prices and quality of the USA. Not the gov control and costs of a UK, EU nation.
It will all be part of systemd soon.
After that the only thinking the user has to do is find the GUI they want and use the classic text editor they like.
AC what are the smartest people who like to code going to do?
They have the wealth, freedom and free time to find another hobby. With no CoC and virtue signalling to spend hours on.
Average and well below average people are not going to be able to keep a modern OS working year to year.
Want a great OS? Attract and keep the very best people. That result is really great code AC and code review.
Thats the smartest people in a generation who are giving their free time away to code.
That free time could be lost back to work. Another project. A hobby.
Freedom after speech.
Freedom of the press. A fully protected occupation for US citizens.
The freedom to publish.
The ability to use social media as a utility to petition the government via a gov site on social media.
Publishers and the press should also get their tools of the trade (the internet) protected from the tyranny of government.
Should all gov approved US journalists be university educated from a gov funded and approved university?
Do US journalists need to pass a federal exam and get federal accreditation every year to be "the press"?
Do all US journalists only get their full freedoms protected if a gov considered them approved journalists?
Does a US journalist need to get big gov permission from their local gov/parish/town/state to enjoy the First Amendment?
The freedom to talk about the politics of a movie. To publish the math of DRM and crypto. To create a very funny political meme.
To publish investigative reporting on any topic using the internet.
To publish links to what a whistleblower said. To comment on what a whistleblower released to the world.
The freedom to LOL at a faith. The freedom to LOL at politics. The freedom to LOL at an actor, movie script.
The freedom to recall past gov/mil policy.
The freedom for the US press to accept, publish and comment on the Pentagon Papers.
To share a reviews of junk weak crypto and DRM code after publication. To quote junk crypto math.
AC many skilled people only have so many hours in the week to work on complex and advanced code for free.
They can work on code like they did in the past.
They can keep up with changes in a CoC and respond to virtue signalling comments about code.
The CPU and GPU work has to be done so an OS can work.
Time used on a political CoC takes hours away.
Over years and decades a project slips further behind rapid tech advancements.
For politics? To allow for better virtue signalling? Thats not going to support an advanced OS.
Let computer people make great computer code again.
New CPU and GPU designs need the most advanced new code. Code that is tested.
Let the smartest people write code and more code.
Time on the politics and virtue signalling of a CoC is not time used for new code.
It adds noting to code and takes time away from ver smart people who could be doing actual code related work.
The "UK did perfectly well" at importing the US software and hardware it needed and that people wanted.
All that UK spending in schools resulted in not UK computer growth and exports.
No huge new UK production lines and UK jobs exporting UK designed and owned tech to the world.
Support for UK education and a few UK computer production lines just used more and more tax payers money.
Like in France.
The world moved to the price, quality and freedom of US services, software, networks and hardware.
The UK proved a new desktop computer did not result in better generational education.
The nations academic results stayed the same and that tax payers spending could have been used in other areas.
Average and well below average students wanted new fun computer games and that is what the US/Japan sold.
The best UK students wanted the most advanced new computers and that is what the US sold.
Now the US thinks below and well below average students are going to do well using a lot of new computers?
Access to a new computer does not make a well below average students "learn" better, learn more quicker, to become more "smart", to pass tests "better".
Test the best students and support the most advanced math in college. That will allow the USA to export the most advanced tech to the world.
Why would any internet user want to accept tracking by a computer company, ad company?
Thats the problem for the US gov.
The Pentagon Papers and press freedom is on the side of any US publisher.
The EU likes censorship a lot and wants control over publication, images, cartoons, memes, political comments, links, art, culture, history, reviews, news.
The USA gives people freedom of speech and freedom after speech. Freedom of the press.
is not the ISP you're looking for.
Police have been going undercover for many years all over the USA.
What is so special about social media?
Why should criminals and illegal immigrants feel free on social media?
Law enforcement groups should be all over social media all over the USA.
Why should any company "rules" protect people from their nations police?
Social media is a utility that connects people. Is social media now the "publisher"/"owner" of peoples comments, links, video clips?
What does social media want to be? Have total legal control over everything in users accounts?
That would make social media the "publisher" of a lot of peoples work, video clips, links, art... crime?
Perhaps social media should stay as a utility connecting people.. Users who are responsible for their own content and crimes.
Its time for a German all-electric subcompact.
With map pockets, ashtrays, carpeting, vanity mirror and flower vase.
Powered by new battery cells. Russian nickel imports too.
Lots of nations had plans for nuclear weapons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Some got very near to testing.
only wants to ensure its ads get access.
Any other company, product, service that is not moving their ads is a public relations project.
Re " Capitalism has failed"
Thats what's makes US capitalism so good at producing the products and services the world wants.
The freedom to try something, see if it works, sell and make a profit. The try someone th new again. Fail and start again.
Its not like the UK with strong regulation and laws about who can try what.
A France and Germany where once the "brand"/"company" is approved and established it "has" to look after its full time workers.
Nations outside the USA keep regulations on starting a company, what can be done once a company is approved. Thats huge costs before making any profit.
The truth for the EU is awakening. People want the freedom, prices and quality of the USA. Not the gov control and costs of a UK, EU nation.
In Taiwan, the real China people can enjoy arts and culture. From South Korea, Japan, the USA, UK.
AC A new walk in Faraday tent is ready back at the inner city apartment?
The world does not need EU gov censorship and an EU link tax.
The cost of collect it all and keep it all is less than sorting.
Add a lot more systemd.
1+ for Haiku.
It will all be part of systemd soon.
After that the only thinking the user has to do is find the GUI they want and use the classic text editor they like.
AC what are the smartest people who like to code going to do?
They have the wealth, freedom and free time to find another hobby. With no CoC and virtue signalling to spend hours on.
Average and well below average people are not going to be able to keep a modern OS working year to year.
Want a great OS? Attract and keep the very best people. That result is really great code AC and code review.
Thats the smartest people in a generation who are giving their free time away to code.
That free time could be lost back to work. Another project. A hobby.
Freedom after speech.
Freedom of the press. A fully protected occupation for US citizens.
The freedom to publish.
The ability to use social media as a utility to petition the government via a gov site on social media.
Publishers and the press should also get their tools of the trade (the internet) protected from the tyranny of government.
Should all gov approved US journalists be university educated from a gov funded and approved university?
Do US journalists need to pass a federal exam and get federal accreditation every year to be "the press"?
Do all US journalists only get their full freedoms protected if a gov considered them approved journalists?
Does a US journalist need to get big gov permission from their local gov/parish/town/state to enjoy the First Amendment?
The freedom to talk about the politics of a movie. To publish the math of DRM and crypto. To create a very funny political meme.
To publish investigative reporting on any topic using the internet.
To publish links to what a whistleblower said. To comment on what a whistleblower released to the world.
The freedom to LOL at a faith. The freedom to LOL at politics. The freedom to LOL at an actor, movie script.
The freedom to recall past gov/mil policy.
The freedom for the US press to accept, publish and comment on the Pentagon Papers.
To share a reviews of junk weak crypto and DRM code after publication. To quote junk crypto math.
AC many skilled people only have so many hours in the week to work on complex and advanced code for free.
They can work on code like they did in the past.
They can keep up with changes in a CoC and respond to virtue signalling comments about code.
The CPU and GPU work has to be done so an OS can work.
Time used on a political CoC takes hours away.
Over years and decades a project slips further behind rapid tech advancements.
For politics? To allow for better virtue signalling? Thats not going to support an advanced OS.
Let computer people make great computer code again.
New CPU and GPU designs need the most advanced new code. Code that is tested.
Let the smartest people write code and more code.
Time on the politics and virtue signalling of a CoC is not time used for new code.
It adds noting to code and takes time away from ver smart people who could be doing actual code related work.
The "UK did perfectly well" at importing the US software and hardware it needed and that people wanted.
All that UK spending in schools resulted in not UK computer growth and exports.
No huge new UK production lines and UK jobs exporting UK designed and owned tech to the world.
Support for UK education and a few UK computer production lines just used more and more tax payers money.
Like in France.
The world moved to the price, quality and freedom of US services, software, networks and hardware.
The UK proved a new desktop computer did not result in better generational education.
The nations academic results stayed the same and that tax payers spending could have been used in other areas.
Average and well below average students wanted new fun computer games and that is what the US/Japan sold.
The best UK students wanted the most advanced new computers and that is what the US sold.
Now the US thinks below and well below average students are going to do well using a lot of new computers?
Access to a new computer does not make a well below average students "learn" better, learn more quicker, to become more "smart", to pass tests "better".
Test the best students and support the most advanced math in college. That will allow the USA to export the most advanced tech to the world.
No Ada?
The 1977 plot worked. People liked the heroic space plot.
The new SJW, political agenda is noticed and people have their own comments and reviews.
Tape over a webcam. Don't buy any always on microphone product.
Not for the ads?