Tons of blank space, far less news on the screen. It was fine before, not cramped or hard to read. I don't understand how they would think the new layout is an improvement.
And of course if you read that article it turns out the bug is with a third party app and not iOS so I don't know why you'd think Apple would be responsible for fixing it.
Nonsense. I did read the article. (Obviously, since I linked to it, right?) No, it's not the app's fault. The app had a file that was "too big". Except it wasn't too big until now, and Apple didn't say "don't make that file too big". It is a bug in iOS 9.3.
I've been disappointed with most of the click-wheel mice I've used. I guess it's hard to balance the stiffness of the wheel and the button - either the button is too easy to click by mistake when scrolling, or too stiff so it's hard to click without moving the scroll wheel. I've had problems with brands like Microsoft and Logitech.
My favourite mouse currently is a Razer Taipan. I got it for gaming, but I love it for general desktop use. It's got the best button feel of any mouse I've used, including the scroll-wheel button. It's not cheap, but I don't mind spending a few bucks on a tool I use all the time.
Why were books, magazines and newspapers never banned before? They're just as much of a distraction (at least, they used to be until smartphones took over). Heck, they give away magazines in every seat pocket.
There are other theorems with computer-assisted proofs that are too complex to verify by hand, going back decades. The four colour map theorem and the classification of finite simple groups are two examples.
According to the data in the paper, the increase in illness started about the same time that Gossip Girl premiered. Clearly that TV show made people sick.
My conclusion makes exactly as much scientific sense as theirs. In other words, their "science" is bullshit.
What's not to like? How about a government agency enforcing a company's decision to conceal and not fix vulnerabilities? As far as I can see, there's no requirement that a company must agree to disclose at all; and white-hats who don't follow the guidelines are not offered any legal protection.
We've seen time and again what happens when "responsible disclosure" is abused to allow security holes to go unfixed and exploited. This is big step backwards.
> Responding to criticism, Bay thoughtfully explained that fans need to "chill."
Fans need to ignore Michael Bay and his movies entirely. I've never seen one of Bay's movies, he has never "ruined" anything for me, and I am perfectly content.
I wouldn't join with the same profile that I used personally.
Exactly. My work email address is different from my personal one, and likewise for social networks. The profile set up by my employer is used for work purposes only - it's got nothing to do with my personal life.
Examination of the example in the article suggests a heuristic algorithm that should provide near-optimal solutions and is suitable for real-time execution on neural wetware.
1. Start by mowing around the outside border. 2. Proceed going around, from the outside in. 3. When you reach a strip <= 3 mowers wide, clear it with short back-and-forths.
Proof of an upper bound on excess mowing vis-a-vis the optimal solution is left as an exercise for the reader.
Slashdot Mirror
But I didn't lose all of my money to QuadrigaCX, so I need to know who can scam the rest off me.
These people will just start a new business and rehire the core team. Watch.
And here it is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/02/cambridge_analytica_shutdown/
Tons of blank space, far less news on the screen. It was fine before, not cramped or hard to read. I don't understand how they would think the new layout is an improvement.
Considering that Nvidia released broken drivers that borked my computer *twice* this year, it's not even useful for that.
That's because the Slashdot summary is a copy of the article's correction paragraph. *facepalm*
Didn't I just read that 7-Eleven is already doing drone deliveries? Yes, I did.
And of course if you read that article it turns out the bug is with a third party app and not iOS so I don't know why you'd think Apple would be responsible for fixing it.
Nonsense. I did read the article. (Obviously, since I linked to it, right?) No, it's not the app's fault. The app had a file that was "too big". Except it wasn't too big until now, and Apple didn't say "don't make that file too big". It is a bug in iOS 9.3.
What about the bug that crashes apps when you tap on a hyperlink?
is there some sort of 'right to be installed' that software possesses that nobody told me about?
They were probably trying to get the court to invent one, similar to the EU's ridiculous "right to be forgotten".
4% is Superfish, 5% is ALL ad injection. Jeez.
I've been disappointed with most of the click-wheel mice I've used. I guess it's hard to balance the stiffness of the wheel and the button - either the button is too easy to click by mistake when scrolling, or too stiff so it's hard to click without moving the scroll wheel. I've had problems with brands like Microsoft and Logitech.
My favourite mouse currently is a Razer Taipan. I got it for gaming, but I love it for general desktop use. It's got the best button feel of any mouse I've used, including the scroll-wheel button. It's not cheap, but I don't mind spending a few bucks on a tool I use all the time.
I'll be impressed when they dance a quicksort to Flight of the Bumblebee.
Why were books, magazines and newspapers never banned before? They're just as much of a distraction (at least, they used to be until smartphones took over). Heck, they give away magazines in every seat pocket.
"There seems to be a bagel with the ignition switch that we should look into."
The emails and memos will still get written, and it's not like anyone will be fooled by the obtuse circumlocutions.
There are other theorems with computer-assisted proofs that are too complex to verify by hand, going back decades. The four colour map theorem and the classification of finite simple groups are two examples.
According to the data in the paper, the increase in illness started about the same time that Gossip Girl premiered. Clearly that TV show made people sick.
My conclusion makes exactly as much scientific sense as theirs. In other words, their "science" is bullshit.
They haven't been replying to all the petitions that met the requirements, so why do they need to raise the requirements?
We've seen time and again what happens when "responsible disclosure" is abused to allow security holes to go unfixed and exploited. This is big step backwards.
My thought was "EVERY baby needs a driveable robot!"
If that's the way they work, they should not be selling mission-critical software that is exposed to the internet.
Well I'm not sure, but my guess is that several of the test objectives did not get checked off.
> Responding to criticism, Bay thoughtfully explained that fans need to "chill."
Fans need to ignore Michael Bay and his movies entirely. I've never seen one of Bay's movies, he has never "ruined" anything for me, and I am perfectly content.
I wouldn't join with the same profile that I used personally.
Exactly. My work email address is different from my personal one, and likewise for social networks. The profile set up by my employer is used for work purposes only - it's got nothing to do with my personal life.
Examination of the example in the article suggests a heuristic algorithm that should provide near-optimal solutions and is suitable for real-time execution on neural wetware.
1. Start by mowing around the outside border.
2. Proceed going around, from the outside in.
3. When you reach a strip <= 3 mowers wide, clear it with short back-and-forths.
Proof of an upper bound on excess mowing vis-a-vis the optimal solution is left as an exercise for the reader.
If I click "Random Article" a few times, it'll soon come up with a village in Poland - a lot more often than France.