Slashdot Mirror


Biden Reveals Location of Secret VP Bunker

Hugh Pickens writes "Fox News reports that 'Vice President Joe Biden, well-known for his verbal gaffes, may have finally outdone himself, divulging potentially classified information meant to save the life of a sitting vice president.' According to the report, while recently attending the Gridiron Club dinner in Washington, an annual event where powerful politicians and media elite get a chance to cozy up to one another, Biden told his dinnermates about the existence of a secret bunker under the old US Naval Observatory, which is now the home of the vice president. Although earlier reports had placed the Vice-Presidential hide-out in a highly secure complex of buildings inside Raven Rock Mountain near Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania, Fox News reports that the Naval Observatory bunker is believed to be the secure, undisclosed location former Vice President Dick Cheney remained under protection in secret after the 9/11 attacks. According to the report, Biden 'said a young naval officer giving him a tour of the residence showed him the hideaway, which is behind a massive steel door secured by an elaborate lock with a narrow connecting hallway lined with shelves filled with communications equipment.' According to Eleanor Clift, Newsweek magazine's Washington contributing editor 'the officer explained that when Cheney was in lock down, this was where his most trusted aides were stationed, an image that Biden conveyed in a way that suggested we shouldn't be surprised that the policies that emerged were off the wall.' In December 2002, neighbors complained of loud construction work being done at the Naval Observatory, which has been used as a residence by vice presidents since 1974. The upset neighbors were sent a letter by the observatory's superintendent, calling the work 'sensitive in nature' and 'classified' and that it was urgent it be completed on a highly accelerated schedule."

550 comments

  1. Yeah, real big secret by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like one of those open secrets like "When did the shuttle launch?"

    "Sorry, it's carrying a classified military payload and we cannot comment on it."

    "I heard a loud rumble at 2pm and saw a pillar of fire rising from the Cape. Was that the shuttle?"

    "We can neither confirm nor deny."

    "Then I'll post it on the internet."

    "ZOMG!!!! Teh tarrists know everything now! Throw this man in prison!"

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Yeah, real big secret by shaka999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't have discussed it at all.

      I'm wondering when he'll give away something that actually matters.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    2. Re:Yeah, real big secret by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean kind of like exposing the identity of an active duty undercover CIA agent? He's got a long way to go before he can top that one.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    3. Re:Yeah, real big secret by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm wondering when he'll give away something that actually matters.

      You mean like Geraldo Rivera giving away operational plans of our forces when invading Iraq? You know, endangering our brave men and women as they occupy a foreign country for political purposes.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:Yeah, real big secret by jgtg32a · · Score: 5, Funny

      Granted he didn't give anything useful away. I figured the only reason anyone cared is because Biden is a senile old man and its always fun to hear them say things they aren't suppose to.

    5. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      She wasn't an active duty cia agent, which is why nobody was even charged, let alone convicted, of outing her.

    6. Re:Yeah, real big secret by moon3 · · Score: 1

      "I don't know exactly how to put this, sir, but are you aware of what a serious breach of security that would be? I mean, he'll see everything, he'll... he'll see the Big Board!"
      -- George C. Scott in "Dr. Strangelove"

      Not a "big board" but still something he should not have discussed or joked about.

    7. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hedwards · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's pretty much complete bullshit right there. It's the job of the military to censor that sort of information. It's not his fault if the military flunky that was supposed to be handling that screwed it up.

      But then again, why question it when somebody accuses the "liberal" media of doing something that the Republican party doesn't like, I mean hey, it's not like it's the responsibility of the military to censor such things.

    8. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I won't disagree he needs to control his mouth better. His flu remarks were just plain dumb.

      On the other hand, this is no big deal. If somebody wants to target ICBMs to take out the US government's top echelon, they aren't going to skip the old naval observatory because "oh, the veep is in his secret bunker". In any case, the Bush administration pretty much spilled the beans when they had the veep's residence obscured in public imagery data sets.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, at least get the facts straight. She was not undercover... no agent going in the front door of the CIA on a daily basis is considered to be undercover. Also, it was not anybody within the Bush Administration that "leaked" it to Robert Novack. Go ask Gen. Powell, he knew the guy who leaked it and yet said nothing... maybe we should prosecute him?

    10. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, just keep using Bush as an excuse for the current administration's fuck ups. Why own up to mistakes when you can change the subject?

    11. Re:Yeah, real big secret by MBaldelli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like one of those open secrets like "When did the shuttle launch?"

      ...

      All this noise because he revealed one of the many cubbyholes they can stuff the President/Vice-President in when there's threats to the chain of command for the United States?

      Any strategist knows that there has to be several of them; it would be completely foolish to think there's only one.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    12. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Lensman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Scooter was charged, and convicted... He just got his sentence commuted by Bush (Heck of a job Scootie)

    13. Re:Yeah, real big secret by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the job of the military to censor that sort of information.

      It was a LIVE broadcast. You think the military had the equipment necessary to do a 3-second delay for EVERY news crew that was embedded with the troops?

      Further, it's known to every reporter that under no circumstances do they divulge operational information without it first being cleared by the military censors. Why Geraldo was the ONLY reporter not to understand this dictum is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    14. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was curious why a high-ranking official in President Bill Clinton's National Security Council (NSC) was given this assignment. Wilson had become a vocal opponent of President Bush's policies in Iraq after contributing to Al Gore in the last election cycle and John Kerry in this one. During a long conversation with a senior administration official, I asked why Wilson was assigned the mission to Niger. He said Wilson had been sent by the CIA's counter-proliferation section at the suggestion of one of its employees, his wife. It was an offhand revelation from this official, who is no partisan gunslinger. When I called another official for confirmation, he said: "Oh, you know about it." The published report that somebody in the White House failed to plant this story with six reporters and finally found me as a willing pawn is simply untrue. At the CIA, the official designated to talk to me denied that Wilson's wife had inspired his selection but said she was delegated to request his help. He asked me not to use her name, saying she probably never again will be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she travels abroad. He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name. I used it in the sixth paragraph of my column because it looked like the missing explanation of an otherwise incredible choice by the CIA for its mission.

      That was per Novak -- the guy who noted Plame was CIA... So who leaked her ID again?

    15. Re:Yeah, real big secret by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with revealing even a PAST CIA agent's identity is that every cover company they worked for and every other agent they had contact with is now exposed as well and some of THEM may be still active. It's seriously one of the few areas where 'but national security' is actually true, unlike stupid shit like taking a picture of a building which has been photographed millions of times before.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Yeah, real big secret by aeroseth · · Score: 1

      Poor Eleanor Clift I bet she was sure she was winning a Pulitzer prize for that news story! Big deal, everyone knows where Fort Knox is, it doesn't make it any less secure. Anybody knows where all the oil refineries are, taking a refinery out is more of a threat then offing a political leader. (just look at Iraq)

      Who do people think these politicians are that we couldn't survive without them? Bah!

      --
      "Is that real poncho or a Sears poncho?" ~~FZ
    17. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow are you stupid...

      "On July 14, 2003, Washington Post journalist Robert Novak effectively ended Valerie Plame's career with the CIA (from which she later resigned in December 2005) by revealing her identity as a CIA operative in his column."

      "But official legal documents published in the course of the CIA leak grand jury investigation, United States v. Libby, and Congressional investigations, fully establish her classified employment as a covert officer for the CIA at the time that Novak's column was published in July 2003."

      "Waxman read a statement about Plame's CIA career that had been cleared by CIA director Gen. Michael V. Hayden and the CIA, stating that she was undercover and that her employment status with the CIA was classified information prohibited from disclosure under Executive Order 12958."

    18. Re:Yeah, real big secret by penguin_dance · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm wondering when he'll give away something that actually matters.

      I suspect it will matter to HIM if we're attacked again and he has to hide in a now disclosed location.

      But maybe this is just part of Obama's "open and transparent government."

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    19. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you bother reading your citation?

      It convicted Libby on four of the five counts against him: two counts of perjury, one count of obstruction of justice in a grand jury investigation, and one of the two counts of making false statements to federal investigators.

      All the convictions were a la Martha Stewart (giving false information during an investigation). Not for some "crime" that was never established...

    20. Re:Yeah, real big secret by moeinvt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Fitzgerald indicted Libby on five counts: one count of obstruction of justice two counts of making false statements when interviewed by agents of the FBI, and two counts of perjury in his testimony before the grand jury."

      I always wondered why it wasn't a crime to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent on active duty. If it IS a crime, why wasn't Libby or anyone else ever charged with that offense?

    21. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, she was an active duty agent. She just wasn't stationed overseas. She has "non official cover" (that is she used her own name and identity while working for a front company). In that capacity she traveled overseas and met with foreign intelligence "assets".

      Under the circumstances, she was not put in immediate danger, but anybody overseas she met with was placed in grave danger.

      The reason there were no convictions was that Scooter took the fall for obstruction and perjury. Bush commuted his sentence before he spilled his guts.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    22. Re:Yeah, real big secret by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Those things are all important, but even though she was currently working at Langley, she was still considered as an undercover operative. From the wiki I linked to above:

      On March 16, 2007, at these hearings about the disclosure, Waxman read a statement about Plame's CIA career that had been cleared by CIA director Gen. Michael V. Hayden and the CIA, stating that she was undercover and that her employment status with the CIA was classified information prohibited from disclosure under Executive Order 12958.

      Note that at the time she was exposed, she was still considered an undercover operative. And here's another source:

      ...whether administration officials had illegally disclosed the name of an undercover C.I.A. officer.

      She was still active duty, she could have gone undercover when a new assignment came up, and Cheney and Co. leaked her name anyway to the press for political purposes. And yet somehow my comment above is getting flamebait and troll mods for pointing this out. The words "double standards" come to mind. When Republicans lie and cheat and steal, it's for our protection, when Democrats do it, it's because they're traitorous liberals who hate america. Hypocrisy.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    23. Re:Yeah, real big secret by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe now that this is 'open' someone from China can post the floorplans for us to see?

    24. Re:Yeah, real big secret by bcattwoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, Geraldo is also an idiot. What is your point?

    25. Re:Yeah, real big secret by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean kind of like exposing the identity of an active duty undercover CIA agent? He's got a long way to go before he can top that one.

      And who gave away the ID of that "undercover" agent? If you are implying that Cheney had anything to do with it, you are dead wrong. It was Richard Armitage. Although I understand how tempting it is to pin this on the big bad Dick and his staff, it's simply not true. It does make me wonder, however, of the bad stuff that gets falsely pinned to Dick, if the guy is really that bad at all. If people like you falsely accuse Cheney of this well after it has been proven to be false, how much other stuff out there is being pinned on the Bush administration that it had nothing to do with. I could list several more examples, like "Bush banned stem cell research" but don't want to get further off topic. I feel this is worth pointing out as a fine example of "if you repeat a lie over and over, it becomes true."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    26. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I always wondered why it wasn't a crime to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent on active duty. If it IS a crime, why wasn't Libby or anyone else ever charged with that offense?

      Simple. According to Novak, there was noone who really LEAKED the information to him. No leak, no crime.

      But that wont stop people from perpetuating this meme...

    27. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      She wasn't an undercover agent. She worked at the CIA. The real problem was that the idiots obstructed and lied because they felt they couldn't just tell the press to fuck off.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    28. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reason there were no convictions was that Scooter took the fall for obstruction and perjury. Bush commuted his sentence before he spilled his guts.

      And this was coordinated by the Skull and Bones wing of the Free Masons working in conjunction with the Bavarian Illuminati. They receive their funding from the Rothchilds, you know.

      Of course, your claims are only valid if Novak and everyone he cited is lying. But why let that stop you...

    29. Re:Yeah, real big secret by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ""Fitzgerald indicted Libby on five counts: one count of obstruction of justice two counts of making false statements when interviewed by agents of the FBI, and two counts of perjury in his testimony before the grand jury."

      Again it shows that the smart thing to do (especially if you ARE innocent) is if the feds/cops come around asking questions. Shut up, and lawyer up.

      You know...it has always bothered me that the cops can lie to you with impunity, yet you get in trouble if you lie to them?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob Novak is a fucking liar, and it's likely he made up all his 'sources'.

    31. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean kind of like exposing the identity of an active duty undercover CIA agent? He's got a long way to go before he can top that one.

      Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA employee was blown the minute her husband decided to start lying, publicly, about his trip to Nigeria.

    32. Re:Yeah, real big secret by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      should have shot him.
      it would have been legal to do so.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    33. Re:Yeah, real big secret by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The words "double standards" come to mind. When Republicans lie and cheat and steal, it's for our protection, when Democrats do it, it's because they're traitorous liberals who hate america. Hypocrisy.

      Both sides will lie, cheat, and steal anything they can to make their side look good and the other side look bad. Neither party has a monopoly on douchebaggery.

    34. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah... because Armitage is some "made up guy". And he's in the pocket of the this vast evil conspiracy, right? And Novak has this huge documented history of lying, right? I'm sure it's just an oversight of yours to forget to include citations, right?

    35. Re:Yeah, real big secret by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you bother reading your citation?

      It convicted Libby on four of the five counts against him: two counts of perjury, one count of obstruction of justice in a grand jury investigation, and one of the two counts of making false statements to federal investigators.

      All the convictions were a la Martha Stewart (giving false information during an investigation). Not for some "crime" that was never established...

      The crime wasn't established because Libby screwed with the investigation. That was the entire point of the matter. Did you not pay any attention to Patrick Fitzgerald's findings? Or are you really trying to spout off talking points that were discredited hours after they came out?

    36. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      So let me get this straight...

      The "Undisclosed Location" where we hide the Vice President in times of national emergency when we fear for their safety and the line of succession to lead the nation...

      is underneath the "Disclosed Location" where the Vice Presidents lived since the 70s??

      That'd be like Batman hiding his Secret Bat Lair underneath Wayne Manor, if Batman had already fully disclosed that Batman is Bruce Wayne.

      I mean I guess it's one of those "They'd never think to look for him there!" just-crazy-enough-to-work kinds of plans... Or is it just-crazy-enough-to-fail-hilariously?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    37. Re:Yeah, real big secret by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "He asked me not to use her name, saying she probably never again will be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she travels abroad. He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name."

      See, this is the part I don't get. I don't style myself an intellectual pundit with my finger on the pulse of Washington, but Good God! What kind of "difficulties" does Novak think known CIA operatives are subject to in other countries? Unable to get good wifi spots? Not able to attract the attention of waiters? I'm thinking...hmmm...it'll come to me... oh yeah. The people who hate us might try to kill her and every asset she ever ran. And I don't even get paid to put in the maybe ten microseconds of logic it took to get there.

      If Sam Adams was alive, he would come in the dead of night for Mr. Novak - with the Sons of Liberty, some pitch, some feathers, and a rail.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    38. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Regardless, he was the deputy secretary to the vice president. I'm pretty sure if there was any dirt on the VP, he'd have it. At best you can say that he's guilty of lying about something which wasn't a crime. But why would you lie about something that wasn't a crime, unless you thought it was?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    39. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, yeah, and Al Capone wasn't really a mobster, he merely failed to disclose certain things on his tax returns that may or may not have had anything to do with crime, we can't really say.

      What part of "Libbie was convicted of perjury," as in convicted of lying to conceal the truth, makes you think the truth got out?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    40. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 0

      The crime wasn't established because Libby screwed with the investigation. That was the entire point of the matter. Did you not pay any attention to Patrick Fitzgerald's findings? Or are you really trying to spout off talking points that were discredited hours after they came out?

      To use YOUR words, "Did you not pay attention to" Novak, and Armitage? Novak who published the article which "leaked" this information... and Armitage who did the leaking? Do some research. You'll find this little tidbit:

      An accurate depiction of what Armitage actually said deepens the irony of his being my source. He was a foremost internal skeptic of the administration's war policy, and I had long opposed military intervention in Iraq. Zealous foes of George W. Bush transformed me, improbably, into the president's lapdog. But they cannot fit Armitage into the left-wing fantasy of a well-crafted White House conspiracy to destroy Joe and Valerie Wilson. The news that he, and not Karl Rove, was the leaker was devastating for the left.

    41. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You mean kind of like exposing the identity of an active duty undercover CIA agent?

      Plame being a CIA agent was an open secret. Also, leaking her name was — whether legal or illegal — a deliberate act. Whoever did it, knew, what they were doing. On contrast, Biden did not mean to reveal the secret. He simply has demonstrated himself to be a fool again, who does not know, what he is doing or saying... His plagiarist prime is decades behind him — he is simply an old fool now, whose mind has long deteriorated either from health decline or just arrogance...

      Its been clear since the vice-presidential debates last fall, that having Sarah Palin be "within heartbeat from presidency" would've been a lot safer for the US and the world... But hey, how much was spent on her clothing was deemed more important, than the giant errors in his foreign policy "experience" and other problems.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    42. Re:Yeah, real big secret by dachshund · · Score: 3, Funny

      Giving false information during a Federal investigation. If you ever do it, expect to go to jail for some time --- and deserve it. Doesn't matter if you're even the target of the investigation.

      Now, if you are one of the targets of the investigation and you lie to investigators to cover your tracks and impede the investigation... then expect to be convicted on all counts and really deserve it.

      (Incidentally, every time a Republican defends Scooter Libby, a Democratic Congressman somewhere wins a special election :)

    43. Re:Yeah, real big secret by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Old men say the darndest things...

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    44. Re:Yeah, real big secret by fwice · · Score: 1

      you could tell there was a bunker there when they started blurring the location in google maps:

      source

    45. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this was coordinated by the Skull and Bones wing of the Free Masons working in conjunction with the Sicilian Illuminati. They receive their funding from the Rothchilds, you know.

      Fixed that for you.

    46. Re:Yeah, real big secret by calyphus · · Score: 1

      He apparently see's the information as being so obvious as to negate it's sensitivity. I'd much prefer a little information sunshine to fabricated classifications, e.g. "Treat as Secret," anyday.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
    47. Re:Yeah, real big secret by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      His security clearance should be revoked since he can't control his mouth.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    48. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What part of "Libbie was convicted of perjury," as in convicted of lying to conceal the truth, makes you think the truth got out?

      In court? The truth that Libbie lied "got out". Since there was no proof that he knew who leaked Plame's name, it obviously didn't come out. It's not unreasonable that this "truth" didn't exist in the Libbie case.

      However, in 2006, THAT truth DID come out. It was Armitage. He came forward. Novak confirmed.

      Per Novak:

      [They] cannot fit Armitage into the left-wing fantasy of a well-crafted White House conspiracy to destroy Joe and Valerie Wilson. The news that he, and not Karl Rove, was the leaker was devastating for the left.

      And this:

      Armitage's silence for the next 2 1/2 years caused intense pain for his colleagues in government and enabled partisan Democrats in Congress to falsely accuse Rove of being my primary source

      Why not jump on Armitage for wasting vast government resources by not coming forward?

    49. Re:Yeah, real big secret by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like Plame's husband did when he filled out the bio for Who's Who?

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    50. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason you occupy a foreign country is for Political reasons. The whole purpose of the military is to bring about political goals through the application of violence. Get a grip on reality man!

    51. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Judging from your statement, I'd assume the question "Do you bother reading ANYTHING" is better directed at you.

      Do a search of the news circa 2006 re armitage and novak. See who the leaker really was and then look deep inside yourself and ask why you help perpetuation is false meme.

    52. Re:Yeah, real big secret by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      We'd be safer if the VPs total knowledge of forgien affairs was that "I can see Russia?"

      Please the fact is that who the VP is has no impact on our everyday safety.. just like the TSA has no real impact other than to make us waste toothpaste.

    53. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is not a wh*re. My wife is not a wh*re. My wife is not a wh*re... Is it true yet?

    54. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      (Incidentally, every time a Republican defends Scooter Libby, a Democratic Congressman somewhere wins a special election :)

      Who defends Libby? What he did was wrong. However, it's not unreasonable to point out that there was nothing to suggest he knew who really leaked Plame's name and was trying to protect them. He was convicted, justly so, for other crimes.

      This was essentially put to rest in 2006 with Armitage came forward and Novak confirmed he was the source.

    55. Re:Yeah, real big secret by thelexx · · Score: 1

      "And yet somehow my comment above is getting flamebait and troll mods for pointing this out."

      The Linux bashing thread has the mouth-breathers all fired up, don't worry about it.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    56. Re:Yeah, real big secret by _KiTA_ · · Score: 0

      No, I do not pay attention to Novak, because I do not find him a trustworthy source. He is "ethically challenged" at best.

    57. Re:Yeah, real big secret by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      If its sooooo secret then couldn't fox have strung him up for reveling the location WITHOUT reveling it. The story is that he revealed the location, there is no need to report what locations!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    58. Re:Yeah, real big secret by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Actually, her 'cover' was as the wife of a diplomat, so by outing her, Cheney and the rest of them, now confirmed that every single wife or husband (child, cousin, etc) of a diplomatic officer could be a CIA spy. Of course not like they didn't suspect some of them (or all), but now their kangaroo courts can 'present evidence of such'. Basically making the lives of thousands of people related to Diplomatic officers sightly more complicated.

      Oh, and BTW, while she was in this country when 'outed', she did travel, and now it's reasonable to think that her contacts (even the truly social ones) are under a cloud of suspicion in their home countries. That'll teach them not to cooperate with the U.S.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    59. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Toonol · · Score: 1

      In fact, the fact that he wasn't convicted proves he was guilty!

      Right?

    60. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In court? The truth that Libbie lied "got out". Since there was no proof that he knew who leaked Plame's name, it obviously didn't come out.

      I'm obviously talking about the truth that the lie was intended to cover. Yes there's no proof he knew who leaked, just as there's no proof Al Capon was a mobster. And indeed, maybe Al was truly just a tax cheat.

      The point is -- when the only facts you have are the sworn statements of those involved, and those involved are known to be lying, believing that the version of "truth" these known liars converge upon is actually the truth is ridiculously naive.

      [They] cannot fit Armitage into the left-wing fantasy of a well-crafted White House conspiracy to destroy Joe and Valerie Wilson.

      Yeah, we just had high-level administration officials lying to investigators and the court to cover up the truth. What truth? We don't know. Therefore this group of powerful liars could not possibly have been engaged in conspiracy.

      That's logic.

      Why not jump on Armitage for wasting vast government resources by not coming forward?

      Indeed, why not? For all we know the reason it took so long is because that's how long it took for them to get their story straight in a way that didn't leave anyone (but Libby) swinging in the wind.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    61. Re:Yeah, real big secret by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well I didn't know about it. And now I do. This is a problem, because now Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses can interrupt him during his dinner.

      As for military payloads, the Air Force just puts up "weather satellites", usually on a Delta II or IV rocket. So the shuttle isn't even necessary. And in the rare cases that it is, there is always some sort of scientific payload they can piggy back onto.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    62. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheney didn't leak the name. A moderate Deputy Secretary of State, working under Powell named Richard Armitage did:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091301572.html

      "When Richard Armitage finally acknowledged last week that he was my source three years ago in revealing Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA employee, the former deputy secretary of state's interviews obscured what he really did. I want to set the record straight based on firsthand knowledge."

    63. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By not having an official cover, i.e. diplomatic passport, Valerie Plame showed more courage than the Vice dick has ever shown. would the lawyer ever had a chance to aim at his "friend?"

      View the experience of the American-Iranian journalist: no diplomatic cover and you're at risk.

    64. Re:Yeah, real big secret by locallyunscene · · Score: 4, Informative

      While the information does appear to be leaked by Richard Armitage, the fact he's a good friend of Rove and the highly fortuitous timing of the incident suggest it does not end with Armitage.

      There are such things as coincidences, but I wouldn't say the link to the Bush administration has been "proven false" or even much diminished. Due to Libby's perjury and further pardoning by GWB we will probably never have good evidence for either scenario.

    65. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Toonol · · Score: 1

      And if there was two, there's now one. Which any strategist knows is completely foolish.

      Ah, well, we can just toss 50 million dollars towards building another hideaway.

    66. Re:Yeah, real big secret by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You mean kind of like exposing the identity of an active duty undercover CIA agent? He's got a long way to go before he can top that one.

      Excellent example of two wrongs not making a right.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    67. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since you brought up Sarah Palin (I'd have been happy to let sleeping dogs lie), how important are your Constitutional rights to you?

      Would you really have preferred a Vice President that doesn't even understand the First Amendment?

      "If they convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations, then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."

      And apparently it wasn't just a one-time thing--she continues to believe that private citizens can somehow deny other private citizens the right to freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment:
      http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22511.html

    68. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14723718/

      Would you pay attention to MSNBC?

      HEADLINE: Armitage leak admission creates new questions

      By the way you should be asking yourself if you were incorrect on this issue just how many other issues are you relying on your feelings about the issue rather than the facts.

    69. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get on the wrong side of Dick. When you screw up and he orders your waterboarding I am sure you will change your mind.

    70. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Bush didn't BAN stem cell research. He just said if you did any research with politically incorrect (*) stem cell lines you'd be denied Federal funding for ANYTHING you do, even if totally unrelated, which would kill most research institutes.

      (*) I really need a right wing equivalent for "politically correct", which implies stupid leftist positions, as opposed to stupid rightist positions.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    71. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, endangering our brave men and women as they occupy a foreign country for political purposes.

      And what exactly is wrong with this?

    72. Re:Yeah, real big secret by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      If its sooooo secret then couldn't fox have strung him up for reveling the location WITHOUT reveling it. The story is that he revealed the location, there is no need to report what locations!

      Couldn't the press have just strung up the military for detainee abuses without showing the pictures? The story is that detainees were abused. there is no need to show the pictures.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    73. Re:Yeah, real big secret by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      This isn't a competition. No need to get defensive.

      Besides, Libby did it on purpose. Thats a bit different than not being able to keep your mouth shut.

      And for the record, I'm an Obama supporter.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    74. Re:Yeah, real big secret by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      There are such things as coincidences, but I wouldn't say the link to the Bush administration has been "proven false" or even much diminished. Due to Libby's perjury and further pardoning by GWB we will probably never have good evidence for either scenario.

      GWB did not pardon Libby, he commuted his sentence. There a big difference, Libby is still a convicted felon he just didn't have to serve the time. He also still has to pay a $250K fine.

    75. Re:Yeah, real big secret by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I find this distinction between Cheney and Armitage to be spurious. The point is: whoever gave away the ID of an active duty CIA agent was never prosecuted. Libby was made the fall guy. That is what matters.

      As for whether Armitage was operating independently of Cheney - I find that highly doubtful. There was a small clique of people who were responsible for overall strategy and "thought leadership" (ugly term, but kinda appropriate). Decisions and attitudes went from a small group of people outward. Cheney and Armitage were part of that small, core group.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    76. Re:Yeah, real big secret by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you saying Biden is Batman?

    77. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your accusations would be a lot more credible if you managed to get the name of the country right. Pro-tip: Niger and Nigeria are not the same place.

    78. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 1

      Palin has trouble with the first Biden has trouble with the 2nd and 10th... Were really bent over the table either way...

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    79. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yes she was an undercover operative. That is well established; CIA would never have complained in the first place if not.

    80. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Cops do get in trouble, just like normal citizens do, if they lie under oath, which is perjury, one of the things that Libby was convicted of. Libby was also convicted I imagine because Libby had to sign a written statement that said he was telling the truth to the best of his knowledge. This is a bit like signing a false tax return, the fifth amendment does not apply to you when you do something that dumb. Also, lying to the cops is a dumb idea in general, especially when you are trying to hinder an investigation to protect others.

      I do agree with you, always ask for a lawyer if you are arrested regardless of your guilt or innocence, stay quiet until the lawyer arrives and do only what your lawyer says after that. Going pro se, or being your own lawyer, is a recipe for losing your case and getting more time in prison than you ever thought possible.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    81. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, why not? For all we know the reason it took so long is because that's how long it took for them to get their story straight in a way that didn't leave anyone (but Libby) swinging in the wind.

      Idiot. The prosecutors knew about Armitage before they ever even spoke to Libby. Libby got caught up in a perjury trap, plain and simple. He's an idiot for lying, but your conclusions are just plain stupid. Armitage has said publicly, and been backed up by the prosecutors that he did not come forward because they asked him to remain silent until they completed their investigation. Had he come forward publicly, the whole thing would have been over and they wouldn't have been able to bag anyone. So he cooperated and they got their trophy conviction.

    82. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mattwarden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is this relevant, except in your mind that views everything as partisan attacks?

    83. Re:Yeah, real big secret by daVinci1980 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm sorry man, but Sarah Palin was a terrible choice for VP. She was an obvious appeal to the conservative base, and an attempt to grab the female vote after Obama *didn't* choose Hillary as his running mate.

      The woman has almost no political experience to speak of (the population of her entire state is less than many cities in the US--giving her command over fewer citizens than numerous mayors). This wouldn't have been a problem if her presidential candidate wasn't moderately likely to die during his term, but you had to realize when voting for the team that you were basically voting someone with no experience into the white house

      And to top it off, she had a really unfortunate intersection of personal beliefs and personal circumstances. She doesn't believe in abortion, and she supports abstinence-only sex education, despite statistics that disagreed about its effectiveness. Combine that with the fact that her own daughter is a shining beacon of what abstinence-only education is more likely to cause, and there was a recipe for disaster.

      McCain basically gave Obama the election. If he'd wanted to make it a race, he should've selected Ron Paul as his VP candidate. I'm not even a huge RP fan, but even I would've had to think twice about who I was voting for if he had.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    84. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Giving false information during a Federal investigation. If you ever do it, expect to go to jail for some time --- and deserve it."

      Except in the case of sexual harassment right? Then you get to stay president..

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    85. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Novak is a liar, but that aside, he has no direct knowledge of Plame's actual situation. She was an undercover operative, and she was working on WMD issues concerning Iran. This is well known, uncovered by other reporters, and agreed to by the special prosecutor and the judge in one of the cases. It was also never denied by anyone in the actual court proceedings; only by pundits in staged media appearances reading Rove's talking points. It's because of the confusion they sowed that anyone even takes these silly arguments seriously at all.

    86. Re:Yeah, real big secret by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty bad comparison, the graphic images of what those sick fucks were doing showed what they were doing, reveling the location doesn't actually add anything valuable to the story!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    87. Re:Yeah, real big secret by gtall · · Score: 1

      Biden's the VP, he's Robin.

    88. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Cheney gave the go ahead to his staff to go after Plame; his notes on Wilson's editorial were entered into evidence to that effect and the point was never denied in the investigation. And remember, Armitage was carrying Cheney's water at that point; this happened long before he came out critical of Bush.

    89. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Adams would have his hands full going after most members of the DMC and about 3/4s of the RNC to have time to bother with someone as mundane as Novak.

      That you invoke Adams as you have strongly suggests you know nothing about him or the Sons of Liberty.

    90. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hazem · · Score: 1

      And if there was two, there's now one. Which any strategist knows is completely foolish.

      Yeah, because nobody would have ever guessed that there's a safe-room with communications equipment and weapons under the house where the VP and his family sleep.

    91. Re:Yeah, real big secret by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I hear ya.. the Bush/Cheney administration did and continues to affect enough travesties without adding falsehoods to the list.

      And by the way, embryonic stem cell research does not make me any more uncomfortable than menstruation. In fact, I'm much more comfortable with the former.

    92. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... they care because of partisan politics and the principal of never missing an opportunity to draw negative attention to the other side.

      Slashdot posters apparently are willing to buy into that even when there is no news or information contained in the article... Quoting the entire thing even. Good work, Taco!

      I guess it would have been naive of me to think Slashdot was trying to just promote information sharing without promoting the agendas of individuals at the same time.

    93. Re:Yeah, real big secret by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it would have made great television!

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    94. Re:Yeah, real big secret by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No, you still don't have a wife.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    95. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I guess that brings new meaning to the term "Dark Knight", then.

    96. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      The only reason you occupy a foreign country is for Political reasons.

      The occupation of Post-WWII Japan?

    97. Re:Yeah, real big secret by KarmaRundi · · Score: 1

      Unless that's not the real location and he just said it was to throw off the evildoers...and his previous gaffes were just setups to make this fake one seem more plausible. Not that I believe it, but hey, it's possible.

    98. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel this is worth pointing out as a fine example of "if you repeat a lie over and over, it becomes true."

      You mean like, âoeThe British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa .â, or ""We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade."(from 2002)

      Which lead to one Joesph A Wilson who was a diplomat and a wife who was the said undercover CIA operative to write a contrary oped peice, that ultimately lead to her outing and a smear campaign to shut down any disent. The american people were lied to repeatedly and loudly to move us to war in a country that we had no business in, and when they couldnt find WMD or links to terrorists, they tortured as many people as they could to make them confess to torture. Its not just one thing it the entire systamatic way they went about steamrolling us into a war that has cause far far far more deaths than any one terrorist lead attack has ever led to.

      Bidens gaffe is small potatoes, and what the last administration collaborated to do was a war crime and unamerican. When has america ever defended torture. This is not a "24" fantasy.

    99. Re:Yeah, real big secret by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Cops do get in trouble, just like normal citizens do, if they lie under oath

      Ah, but there are lots of things (like obstruction) that you can get charged with if you lie to a cop while not under oath.

    100. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Any strategist knows that there has to be several of them; it would be completely foolish to think there's only one.

      It's easier to keep it hidden than to build a replacement and keep that hidden.

    101. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Maybe more appropriate to smack him in the face with a chair, though.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    102. Re:Yeah, real big secret by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When is Bill Clinton getting out of jail again for lying in a federal investigation?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    103. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other problem is that Armitage likely leaked by accident, whereas Cheney et al were looking to use that information as leverage. Not quite the same motives here.

    104. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't have discussed it at all.

      Where the hell do you get that idea?

      In case you hadn't noticed, it's his job to decide if that cover's blown, and not yours.

      Jeezus, I can't believe I'm defending Joe Biden. I've known the man all my life, and I don't think I've ever said anything positive about him before. But really, when did Fox News get appointed the keeper of vice-presidential non-secrets? If you didn't know Cheney had a bunker built under the veep's shack, you're pretty blind uninformed. You should probably not vote or breed. Every world leader, terrorist, and DC hooker has known since he started building the thing. I mean, literally, this is common knowledge. I knew about it less than six months after they started building it and I'm in northern Delaware. What possible purpose (other than feeding Dick's Dr. Strangelove fantasies) would keeping this non-secret secret serve?

      Pick on Biden for something meaningful (his swine flu comments perhaps?) and just STFU about this Faux News hysteria. It makes you look stupid, and it's not like there's any shortage of real things to bust on Biden for.

    105. Re:Yeah, real big secret by TimothyDavis · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why it wasn't a crime to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent on active duty. If it IS a crime, why wasn't Libby or anyone else ever charged with that offense?

      I guess this would change the prize structure for the 'Spot the fed' competition at Defcon and Blackhat. Instead of a t-shirt, you get a five year tax payer financed vacation.

    106. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is having consensual sexual relations with an employee considered harassment?

    107. Re:Yeah, real big secret by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      The term you are looking for is "religiously correct" I think.

    108. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps not 'embedding' reporters to act as cheerleaders for a war would lead to better military strategy, even if it isn't as politically favorable. Yes, we should see the realities of war, but protecting and dragging around a camera crew is detrimental to a unit's combat viability and should be seen for what it is: a propaganda generator which poses an unnecessary risk to soldiers' lives.

    109. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, according to this declassified exhibit in United States vs. Libby, Valerie Plame was an undercover agent.

      Therefore by your own logic Novak is a liar.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    110. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd be safer if idiots who can't tell the difference between a comedy show and reality weren't allowed to vote.

    111. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      You're comparing Palin to Biden??? Seriously? I mean, really? I mean Biden has made some mistakes, no doubt, but can you even provide a video (or some sort evidence) where Palin is talking and she isn't sounding like a complete moron that has no idea what she is talking about? Hell most of my Republican friends voted for Obama because of Palin alone. I don't think Biden had that effect on anyone.

    112. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Novak just pulled that information out of thin air, right? I mean, no one leaked it to him, and this is just a stupid meme, so NOVAK IS THE AMAZING FUCKING KRESKIN!

      Awesome.

    113. Re:Yeah, real big secret by arudloff · · Score: 1

      I love how, almost immediately, someone excuses the ignorance of this administration by pointing fingers at the ignorance of the previous administration.

      As if what went on in the past justifies ongoing, continual missteps from our executive branch.

      It's not about red vs. blue. It's about us vs. them. The parent poster has a good point -- it's only a matter of time until this guy runs his mouth off about something that actually matters.

    114. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "I feel this is worth pointing out as a fine example of "if you repeat a lie over and over, it becomes true.""

      Your post? Yeah, we took it as that.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    115. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sort of like dumbasses saying gore claimed to invent the internet?

    116. Re:Yeah, real big secret by DECS · · Score: 1

      So VP Biden tells a bunch of elite dinner mates about this bunker where Cheney hid out and came up with his hermit insane policies for ruling as emperor under the figurehead of Bush, and this is terrible because now some elite old white dudes know national secrets.

      But ITS NOT A PROBLEM FOR FOX NEWS TO MAKE THIS PUBLIC to the millions of gun-toting latent terrorists in its audience who are programmed to hate anyone with a less than Palin level of right-winged-ness.

      Yes, this makes sense. If spreading such secrets is a national emergency, why did Fox choose to do it explicitly? And why weren't they laughed off the planet for this hysterical level of hypocrisy?

    117. Re:Yeah, real big secret by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      THe fun part on this, is that most ppl miss the fact that W, Cheney, and Rove simply said; I do not remember. I suspect that scooter PROBABLY was the ONLY one that had little to nothing to do with that. Keep in mind that just because somebody else MAY have said something, does not mean thatthe others did not commit treason.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    118. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dick, if the guy is really that bad at all.

      Uh, try the PNAC.

      http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

      If you agree with the rubbish put out by the neocon propaganda machine then you are part of the problem plaguing the once healthy U.S.A.

      It's bad enough the conservatives allow convicted mentally ill to walk the streets and fill the penal system - the neo-conservatives would have it be so that anyone not agreeing with their 'moral standard' would in essence be deemed subversive, be denied habeas corpus, and be locked away for good.

      The planned response to 9/11 was put in place long before anyone knew who bin laden was. The Patriot Act is a perfect example of the kind of legislation these nut jobs plan in order to maximize their control structure. A gradual erosion of the populations civil rights, not to mention a shrinking middle class, will doom America to a nation of servants. Fascism and corporate elitism is here to stay, all by the whim of the people listed at the bottom of the link above.

      Delusional to the last.

    119. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Jhon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      wtf? Where did I claim plame WASN'T an undercover agent?

      My claim is that the entire "scandal" was blown way out of proportion and was essentially a non-story politics-wise.

      The following exchange was between Woodward and Armitage over a month before Novak published his article:

      Woodward: Well it was Joe Wilson who was sent by the agency, isn't it?
      Armitage: His wife works for the agency.
      Woodward: Why doesn't that come out? Why does that have to be a big secret?
      Armitage: (over) Everybody knows it.
      Woodward: Everyone knows?
      Armitage: Yeah. And they know 'cause Joe Wilson's been calling everybody. He's pissed off 'cause he was designated as a low level guy went out to look at it. So he's all pissed off.
      Woodward: But why would they send him?
      Armitage: Because his wife's an analyst at the agency.
      Woodward: It's still weird.
      Armitage: He -- he's perfect. She -- she, this is what she does. She's a WMD analyst out there.
      Woodward: Oh, she is.
      Armitage: (over) Yeah.
      Woodward: Oh, I see. I didn't think...
      Armitage: (over) "I know who'll look at it." Yeah, see?
      Woodward: Oh. She's the chief WMD...?
      Armitage: No. She's not the...
      Woodward: But high enough up that she could say, "oh, yeah, hubby will go."
      Armitage: Yeah. She knows [garbled].
      Woodward: Was she out there with him, when he was...?
      Armitage: (over) No, not to my knowledge. I don't know if she was out there. But his wife's in the agency as a WMD analyst. How about that?

      According to Woodward, Plame's own husband was saying this... And this was known by for quite some time.

    120. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      "creates new questions." Not "answers old questions." Jesus, it's amazing how much mileage Rove got off of this Armitage talking point.

    121. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're right, he was probably just lying because he likes to lie, not because he actually had something to hide. Moron.

    122. Re:Yeah, real big secret by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      That you invoke Adams as you have strongly suggests you know nothing about him

      He makes a damn good beer, what else is there to know?

    123. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 1

      The lie was at a trial about another woman with whom the President had has sex (then the governer of Georgia)

      as an aside:

      By the way thanks to the NOW gang Sexual Harassment can even be consensual if, after the fact, the woman feels maybe she was pressured (even if she did not know it at the time)..

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    124. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who gave away the ID of that "undercover" agent? If you are implying that Cheney had anything to do with it, you are dead wrong. It was Richard Armitage.

      I don't see the GP implying that at all. The point is that Armitage admitted to being the leak 2.5 years ago, and has not received any punishment for it whatsoever.

      Hence, it's hard to imagine what sort of security blooper Biden would have to make to receive even a censure.

      This is about security leaks, not the Office of the Vice President.

    125. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JEEZ, MAN! Lay off good ole, Cheney!

      It's not like Cheney shot anyone?! oh...wait...

    126. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      uhh... I don't know about you, but most prosecutors would consider a 7 year prison term to be a pretty hefty bargaining chip to get more information from the guy. Bush took that away and he did in in just a way so fools can claim Bush didn't Quid-pro-quo Libby.

      The fact is 250K is chump change to Libby and the prison term was where the real punishment was.

    127. Re:Yeah, real big secret by baldass_newbie · · Score: 2

      her 'cover' was as the wife of a diplomat, so by outing her, Cheney and the rest of them, now confirmed that every single wife or husband (child, cousin, etc) of a diplomatic officer could be a CIA spy
      But Cheney didn't out her. Nor did Libby. Armitage did.
      Get that into your thick skull.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    128. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Right... he banned the use of federal dollars for a field that is conducting very very basic research that has no fiscal upside for 20-30 years. That is tantamount to banning it. Corporations do not do basic research when there is a payout of decades. It is kind of like claiming that EEStor would have done the basic research to invent the capacitor (pretending there is no economic value in a capacitor) so that they could then commence work on the supercap.

    129. Re:Yeah, real big secret by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Palin may "sound like" a moron to you, but Biden repeated acts like one.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    130. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you picked up on her defense of Ms. Idiot-fornia. If cali girl keeps it up, she might be a VP candidate in 203x.

    131. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Remember, Palin, being a republican, has trouble with the 4th amendment as well... but she LOOOOOOVVVEESSS the 5th.

    132. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, moderation system is so fail in political discussions. :(

    133. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you guys really not getting the point of this? The whole idea of a "secret vice-presidential bunker" is so ridiculous that Biden is doing the country a service by making sure that we don't have one anymore.

    134. Re:Yeah, real big secret by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      A non-story?

      Only if you believe everything Armitage says here, some of which is very self-serving.

      The claim that Wilson was blabbing this about is ridiculous. First of all, he knew damn well his wife wasn't an analyst. She was an operative. Claiming she was an analyst was as good as telling the world she was an operative, because she worked for a front company. He'd be outing her, and he knew damn well that would be a crime with dozens of witnesses: everyone he told.

      The "analyst" bit was what got Armitage off here. He's claiming to be repeating scuttlebutt that originated with Wilson. It couldn't have. There's no documented evidence that anybody without a clearance knew her status until the conversation you cite. However making her an "analyst" makes it should like you're repeating poorly sourced scuttlebutt. Since there was no chance this originated with Wilson, it originated with somebody with access to classified information, and it was carefully engineered to be a plausible rumor that Armitage could repeat without getting into too much trouble. Armitage could be the source, or he could be a catspaw, but somebody set her up.

      As for it being a non-story, she was working on getting information on the Iranian nuclear program. That remains a serious international issue and US national security concern today. So I'd call interfering with that a "story".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    135. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 1

      Re 5th... She is not the only one

      http://www.slate.com/id/1007531/
      "News reports say that President Clinton's brother, Roger, is considering invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination when he is called to testify before the New York grand jury investigating Bill Clinton's pardons."

      So like I said two sides of a worthless coin

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    136. Re:Yeah, real big secret by centuren · · Score: 1

      Undoing an accidental mis-mod.

      Biden's just covering up the project to build a super computer in Raven Rock that will serve as the next president. If he starts talking about Vaults then we'll know he's started to blow it.

    137. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things like VIP bunkers are secret and secure for a reason. Don't make excuses for Joe and the rest of the Democrats because you share the same flawed, liberal ideology. Our enemies don't ask what political party you belong to before they start the killing. I hope you are just as humored and forgiving when the next al-Qaeda attack kills or maims you, your family, and friends due to the next Democrat security breach. Somehow I think you'll have a much different attitude.

    138. Re:Yeah, real big secret by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      It's a good strategy, who cares if VP get's hit? Isn't it better than him taking over?

    139. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      This administration has some real good secrets. Like that Air Force One fiasco in New York was a "top secret military sanctioned project." I'm not sure how flying a jumbo jet at a low altitude around one of the most populated cities in the world is going to be kept secret, but I'm just an educated person.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    140. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      He didn't ban an entire field, only the small portion of the field where he and many others have moral objections to the harvesting methods. It was originally thought that the stem cells from unborn babies were "super" stem cells (they could be made to turn into any cell in the body), however much more useful stem cells are being found elsewhere. Placental stem-cells are significantly better, if what I remember reading recently is correct.

      BTW, since this is turning into a "bash Bush for stem cells" thread, it's worth noting that Obama's plan bans even more lines of stem cells than Bush's did, including lines that were perfectly fine under Bush.

      Cheers.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    141. Re:Yeah, real big secret by brkello · · Score: 1

      No, she is dumb. It is obvious to everyone other than those with mental issues. And you might not want to call people a moron and then be unable to spell "repeatedly". Seriously, it was your only sentence.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    142. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Er, I don't know if you realize this but Wilson was married to his wife. He knew things about what she did that were classified, and used that knowledge and influence to get himself sent on a self important mission to look for WMD materials.

      Frankly, what Armitage says falls neatly in line with what is known to be true, and assuming he is lying "just cause" without any actual evidence kinda shows your bias a little bit, doesn't it?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    143. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 1

      No, she is dumb. It is obvious to everyone other than those with mental issues.

      This, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect example of Illiberal rhetoric: their point is obvious to "normal" people, and whoever disagrees, has "mental issues".

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    144. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 1

      I mean Biden has made some mistakes

      There were obviously gaps in Palin's knowledge, but she never came off as "a moron" and was well aware of her limitations. Biden, on the other hand, is as sure of himself, as a peacock — an arrogance of the decades in the US Senate without any substance behind it. Worse than an empty suit...

      I challenge you to explain away the following quote as a mere "mistake":

      When we kicked -- along with France, we kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, "Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don't know -- if you don't, Hezbollah will control it."

      There, I dare you — change the above sentence to make sense. Make sure, your new version is fewer than 3 sentences...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    145. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      She isn't dumb, she has made a few gaffs but she has done a better job than most of our other governors in recent history.

      She is also someone we can count on as being nigh incorruptable. She has a history of not bowing to the will of her party on any sort of questionable issues. It's actually how she became famous up here, and primarily what won her the election. It's easy to know where she stands, and you can be sure that what she stands for she fights for aggressively. I mean, how often does a staunch republican replace a very unpopular republican incumbant?

      I think, when you say dumb, you really mean "slick" or maybe "slimy" or a "fast talker" like so many politicians are these days.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    146. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lie was at a trial about another woman with whom the President had has sex (then the governer of Georgia)

      Wrong state. Carter was Governor of Georgia and as far as I know, he never lied under oath about sex. Clinton was Governor of Arkansas.

    147. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biden is a JEW. What's he doing running YOUR country?

    148. Re:Yeah, real big secret by dwarfking · · Score: 1

      Here's a question I've always wondered about, what happens if someone refuses to take the oath? Say for example you are brought into court under subpoena, and when you take the stand and they say Do you swear to tell the truth.. you answer with Nope, I don't. Could you be charged later with perjury or lying then?

      Can't see that there is any way to force a person to take the oath, but knowing our system, I'm sure the judge would just say You're under oath anyway or hold you in contempt.

    149. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 1

      Would you really have preferred a Vice President that doesn't even understand the First Amendment?

      In her quote, she does not seem to threaten the First Amendment, does she? Nothing she was saying went any further, than did attempts by many Illiberal Congressmen, for example, in their push for "Fairness Doctrine".

      She is hardly the first politician from "the boondocks" to flabbergasted by the media's ire and stream of falsehoods directed at them (while burying any negatives about competition). Mark Twain wrote about it in "Running For Governor". To experience this first hand and not to wonder, how could inventing and repeating such libels be legal is to be inhuman...

      she continues to believe that private citizens can somehow deny other private citizens the right to freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment

      Written as if you've never heard of anti-libel laws... Or of Al Sharpton — who did try to make a government agency punish New York Post for a cartoon... For another example, I refer you to your fellow Palin-hater brkello below, who has just declared, that Palin is "obviously" a moron, and only people "with mental issues" could possibly disagree. brkello does not appeal to authority, but what's to stop a person with the same line of thinking from prescribing forcible "treatment" to dissenters?

      From legal point of view she was wrong, of course — one only needs to recall things said by Illiberals about Bush to realize, that no speech is illegal, when directed against a public official. But as a human being, I don't blame her... If elected, she would've grown a thicker skin in two weeks — it is not like we were electing a judge.

      Biden, on the other hand, was picked, supposedly, for his much touted "foreign policy expertise" (because Obama does not have any) — and proved to be a complete phony right away...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    150. Re:Yeah, real big secret by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      But Cheney didn't out her. Nor did Libby. Armitage did.

      And Ollie North was the ring leader in his scandal, right. There is every indication that Dick Cheney micromanaged torture sessions, what makes you think that Armitage did anything without approval? However, even if that's true, what was the penalty? Instead of a full accounting and responsibility, a cover up, but you're OK with that, aren't you?

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    151. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      And this was coordinated by the Skull and Bones wing of the Free Masons working in conjunction with the Bavarian Illuminati. They receive their funding from the Rothchilds, you know.

      *Sigh* I swear! All that, and you didn't even mention the Annunaki! I mean, we can't have a real conspiracy theory without blood drinking, shape-shifting, reptilian aliens, can we? What are they teaching kids these days?

    152. Re:Yeah, real big secret by maxume · · Score: 1

      Fair and balanced?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    153. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sides will lie, cheat, and steal anything they can to make their side look good and the other side look bad. Neither party has a monopoly on douchebaggery.

      Huh, that sounds exactly like what someone on the "has a monopoly on douchebaggery" side would say."

    154. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So there are known unknowns, unknown unknowns, known koans, unknown koans, ksdli jfslijf,dfj,n

    155. Re:Yeah, real big secret by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      They aren't liberal in the respectful sense. The people you are talking about are "Statist". They are the same group of people, but we shouldn't let the term "liberal" be bastardized the way it has been.

      And yes, many of us on Slashdot know these Statists suffer from psychological projection. It's a mindset that is both destructive to the community as well as themselves.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    156. Re:Yeah, real big secret by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Monopoly? From where I'm looking from the other side of the world only one party considered that destroying the state established by Washington etc was worth it for personal gains. Hopefully the Republicans have now purged most of that downright Royalist faction that seemed to believe in divine right for elected Kings.
      Is putting in danger any CIA operative that could be connected to Plame just to punish a guy that won't lie on his report Treason? Is that charge simply reserved for people that play chess against Russians now?

    157. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 1

      wow I dont know where GA came from.. Thanks for the correction..

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    158. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps he didn't reveal anything at all. To summarize: "The veep's office said yesterday that he simply described an upstairs workspace that was converted into a guestroom when the Bidens moved in. No security gaffe -- at least that's what they're telling us."

    159. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's group think. They dislike something or somebody, they grouped together, and it's a mob mentality to arrive at a conclusion, usually false, that everyone agrees with.

      It's the same reason people think Palin said that she could see Russia from her house. CNN ran a little fun test about who said what, and most people said Palin said it. They forgot she never did; it was part of a Saturday Night Live skit, NBC (Fox News for the left) and affiliates strike again. Typical MSinformation.

      Even reading the comments below, it's amazing that people are using Capone as a defense for their attacks against Cheney. Capone had direct ties. Capone killed people. By their own argument against Cheney if applied evenly (it won't be), Obama is guilty of revealing clasified information because of his ties to Obama. Obama is a rascist pig because of his ties to a certain black church in Chicago. Now, I don't believe these things against Obama myself, but let's be fair here.

      Cheney's ties aren't there despite years of searching. And if he did expose a CIA operative, there are others in Congress who should be held to the same standard who aren't, and they seem to be overwhelmingly on the Democratic party.

      Worse, there are many other, worse, more direct things that Cheney can be hammered on which are sliding because Pelosi and the Dem leadership were complicit in allowing things, but to take down Cheney, you have to take down some of the Dems, and that unfortunate combination means nothing is being done. Which circles back to Obama.

      Basically, the left, despite winning nice majorities and control, and about to take control of all 3 branches of government, are still too incompetent to live up to their own principles. It would be hugely nice to get thinks more fair and even, but polls are showing the country even worse divided than under Bush2. Just like my parties was for the last 5 years, the Republicans, fubar'd their way into this mess.

    160. Re:Yeah, real big secret by huckamania · · Score: 1

      Way to turn a thread about 'Crazy' Joe the Democrat into a hate fest on the Republicans.

      Valerie Plame was a CIA Agent like the 1st Lady was a Hospital Director. When your husband is a Senator or Ambassador, you get lots of nice job offers. But only if your husband is a Democrat. If your husband is a Democrat and makes it to the Presidency, you get a Senate seat and become the presumptive nominee. No questions asked, literally.

      Valerie Plame was outed by her husband in his autobiography.

    161. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man was impeached, which is the maximum possible punishment for a sitting U.S. president. What more do you want me to say?

    162. Re:Yeah, real big secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course, deign to criticize the Anointed One, be tagged for flamebait.

      A pox on both your houses.

    163. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Try spinning that back around. His plan simply disqualifies older lines because of the lack of consent records.

      Going forward, the money will be flowing for as many new lines as consent forms can be filled out.

    164. Re:Yeah, real big secret by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that what ever Roger is afraid of saying didn't start an illegal war, kill 4000 American soldiers, did not torture people to "get intelligence" that Iraq was working with Al Quada, didn't help friends and cronies profit off of the blood of Americans, didn't let people sit and die in a flooded city just to get the realestate values low for their buddies to buy.... I can go on.

    165. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 1

      They aren't liberal in the respectful sense.

      Of course not. Which is exactly why the term, I used for brkello, was: "Illiberal".

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    166. Re:Yeah, real big secret by FireStormZ · · Score: 1

      "The man was impeached, which is the maximum possible punishment for a sitting U.S. president. What more do you want me to say?"

      Umm no,

      (1) conviction in the senate would be bigger
      (2) In addition to being the president he is still just a citizen so prison for lying under oath would be more serious

      --
      "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    167. Re:Yeah, real big secret by mi · · Score: 1

      So, you refused to answer the challenge... I guess, you just did not realize (because the newspapers have failed in their duty to keep you informed) before, just how much of a disaster your choice of Vice President really is. As a penance, you are required to vote straight Republican in whatever the next elections you vote in...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    168. Re:Yeah, real big secret by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      Armitage worked for Colin Powell. He was not part of the 'Bush' team. He was a career diplomat who worked with both parties which is why nobody wanted him to go down.
      Bottom line: he leaked the name and if anyone should go to jail, it's him.
      Period.

      But the NY Times doesn't want that. They like Colin Powell.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
  2. Always a source of amusment by m0s3m8n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Biden can spell "tomato".

    2. Re:Always a source of amusment by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

      Unfortunately, Biden is making Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar. Will someone please buy that man a muzzle.
      I'm truly at a lose when I try to think of anything that man has brought to the ticket. He's been an embarrassment for Obama.

      On the bright side, if we let him keep talking, perhaps we will all be told more about what happens at Area 51.

    3. Re:Always a source of amusment by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's assasination insurance.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Always a source of amusment by Theoboley · · Score: 3, Informative

      it was "Potatoe," you insensitive clod.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    5. Re:Always a source of amusment by JamesP · · Score: 5, Funny

      So:

      Tomato - Tomatoes
      Potato - Potatoes
      Oh No! - Oh Noes!

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    6. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just remember: any self-respecting king has to have a court jester. Obama's got Biden, Bush 41 had Quayle, and Cheney had Bush 43.

    7. Re:Always a source of amusment by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

      Basically. While the sympathetic media reports them as "gaffes" if any Republican said half the stuff that he did, he'd have a lower reputation than Quayle.

      Seriously, google "Biden Gaffes".

    8. Re:Always a source of amusment by slapout · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm so tired of this myth of Dan Quayle not being able to spell potato. It was misspelled on the card the school gave him.

      Wikipedia:
      Although he was relying on cards provided by the school which included the misspelling, Quayle was widely lambasted for his apparent inability to spell the word "potato". According to his memoirs, Quayle was uncomfortable with the version he gave, but did so because he decided to trust the school's incorrect written materials.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    9. Re:Always a source of amusment by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      It's actually a more interesting issue than you might think. Fox News would certainly like the image of Biden to be a lightweight gaffe-prone goof, while MSNBC would like the image of Biden to be a devoted father and promoter of a better rail transportation system who knows how to work the Senate floor.

      I have to think a similar dual effect happened with regards to Dan Quayle. At the same time, none of Biden's gaffes have suggested that he can't spell.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:Always a source of amusment by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh, what? That's not a debunking, that's a confirmation. He needed a fucking card to spell potato? Nice work there, spanky.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Always a source of amusment by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Oh man, what I wouldn't have given to have that English teacher misspell that word as "douchebag".

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    12. Re:Always a source of amusment by zolltron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to think a similar dual effect happened with regards to Dan Quayle.

      I don't think it did, primarily because the media wasn't as partisan then as it is now. There was no Fox News or MSNBC.

      At the same time, none of Biden's gaffes have suggested that he can't spell.

      Not that I'm interested in defending Quayle, but I always found the spelling bit a red herring. Lots of *very* smart people can't spell. The ability to memorize a large list of words (or the unwillingness to do so) doesn't convey intelligence one way or the other. I always find it strange that people want to equate knowing lots of little bits of information with intelligence.

    13. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be mistaken. While this does happen, it's only when the teleprompter instructs him to do a Bush 43 impression.

    14. Re:Always a source of amusment by orthancstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, but that's when Dan should turn to the organizer and say, "This card has the wrong answer on it."

      His failure to manually make the correction means he's just as wrong as the person who wrote the index card.

    15. Re:Always a source of amusment by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

      Unfortunately, Biden is making Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar. Will someone please buy that man a muzzle.
      I'm truly at a lose when I try to think of anything that man has brought to the ticket. He's been an embarrassment for Obama.

      On the bright side, if we let him keep talking, perhaps we will all be told more about what happens at Area 51.

      Look on the bright side, at least we don't have Palin in there. Here "lack of experience" would have been so much worse. Granted, she had more experience that Obama himself, but that doesn't matter as long as we have a quality VP in Biden.

      (please make sure your sarcasm detector is active when reading the preceding post)

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    16. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quayle's (ghostwritten) memoirs -- there's a unbiased source to be quoting.

    17. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

      I'm truly at a lose when I try to think of anything that man has brought to the ticket. He's been an embarrassment for Obama.

      It's "loss", not "lose". Not a Rhodes Scholar, huh?

    18. Re:Always a source of amusment by pegdhcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that I'm interested in defending Quayle, but I always found the spelling bit a red herring. Lots of *very* smart people can't spell. The ability to memorize a large list of words (or the unwillingness to do so) doesn't convey intelligence one way or the other. I always find it strange that people want to equate knowing lots of little bits of information with intelligence.

      I might have an answer for that. Intelligence can be measured thru methods, those basically depend on communication skills of individuals. So it does not matter how fast/efficient/creative/clear/clever a person thinks, if s/he cannot tell people what is happening between his/her ears, then there is a problem. Surely the verbal communication is not the only form of communication. There is music, performing arts, mathematical expressions, programming etc. However a politician's main, if not only, mode off communication is with people thru written and spoken human basic languages. So if a person (Quayle or George the second) cannot use this method it doesn't matter how intelligent this person is (lets say in mathematics...) He does not have necessary skills to perform his chosen (probably, preferably by himself) profession. And if this person does not know his own limitations, then his intelligence in general can be questioned.

    19. Re:Always a source of amusment by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the one we owe our very internet existence to. The one who is responsible for our beloved internet, and the one who would like to outlaw the production of CO2(That stuff we breathe out). Clintons = Al Gore

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    20. Re:Always a source of amusment by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just remember: any self-respecting king has to have a court jester. Obama's got Biden, Bush 41 had Quayle, and Cheney had Bush 43.

      Obama is a court jestor. You can watch his teleprompter ping pong, count the urrr's and ummm's, watch him completely lose the ability to talk when the teleprompters go out, etc.

      No, that would be Bush. Obama is a professional orator (psst, that means he's dun got trainin' in how to speachify). The whole teleprompter thing is the Republicans attempting to attack people on their strengths. They've done this for decades now.

      Obama's a phenomenal speaker, the Republicans have jack and crap for charisma this generation. So, attack him on that, make him look like he's "cheating" or really NOT a good speaker, and hope the public are willing to believe your talking points over their lying eyes.

      Fortunately they're so far out in the wilderness now (they're even attacking Obama's little dog, too) that this kinda thing isn't working. People are tired of National Enquirer style politics.

    21. Re:Always a source of amusment by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I have to think a similar dual effect happened with regards to Dan Quayle. At the same time, none of Biden's gaffes have suggested that he can't spell."

      No, but, if he has indeed divulged classified information, can't he be prosecuted for that?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Always a source of amusment by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I'm so tired of this myth of Dan Quayle not being able to spell potato.

      Uh... that's the exact version of events I'm familiar with, and the conclusion is the same: Man doesn't know how to spell potato. Would he have spelled it correctly in the absence of a card with the word misspelled on it? Maybe. But when given a card with an obvious misspelling, he "decided to trust" the card.

      But honestly, I'll cut Mr. Quayle some slack. He wasn't that stupid, and he wasn't in that great a position of power. Yes, how standards have dropped since the Bush Sr. years. =D

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    23. Re:Always a source of amusment by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>Ahh, the Dem. version of Dan Quayle.

      Basically. While the sympathetic media reports them as "gaffes" if any Republican said half the stuff that he did, he'd have a lower reputation than Quayle.

      Seriously, google "Biden Gaffes".

      I did. Most of the "Biden Gaffes" are either from Conservative wingnut blogs or from the media, but upon further examination, they're complete non-issues. Like telling people not to go into enclosed places if people are sick -- well, duh, that's common sense. But the Media has "BIDEN MAEK GAFFE" as a meme right now, so, doesn't matter what he says -- if there's a negative way to take it, zomg, GAFFE.

      And I'll have you know that after 8 years of a free pass from Bush basically running this country into the ground by the "liberal" media the very idea that the media has any form of "liberal" bias is laughable. Sure, the reporters might be liberal, but the decision-makers are hardline conservatives. Suddenly the media might "wake up" (read: start actually doing their jobs instead of just copy/pasting press releases) to avoid giving Obama a free pass, but that's fine, because outside of some fabricated scandals, so far, smooth sailing.

    24. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha.

      It's funny that people still believe the media is liberal or biased against Republicans.

    25. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama has excellent speech writers and the ability to read the teleprompter. Anyone who thinks Obama (or any other modern politician) is a "great orator" is either intentionally being an idiot or is just another one of the sheeple.

      Great orators are people like Lincoln and Churchill. U.S. Presidents are all empty suits these days, since the 60's at least.

      Now put down the koolaid and step away from the keyboard.

    26. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if any Republican said half the stuff that he did, he'd have a lower reputation than Quayle.

      If any Republican said half the stuff that Biden does, he'd be called George W. Bush.

    27. Re:Always a source of amusment by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Biden is making Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar

      I think you're being a little hyperbolic. I don't think Biden has ever suggested that we could breathe on Mars.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    28. Re:Always a source of amusment by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      Isn't it neat how people condemn the person given the card instead of the EDUCATOR who gave the card to him?

      The real WTF there isn't Quayle using the exact spelling that was given him, it's that the fucking teacher didn't know how to spell the word. But then, that would offend the NEA, and we can't have that shit, now can we?

    29. Re:Always a source of amusment by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      No, Bush was a completely different monster. Biden says things maybe he shouldn't, but at least it's English. Bush said dumb things in completely dumb ways. Face it, Bush was Philip J. Fry had he not been frozen.

    30. Re:Always a source of amusment by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Obama has excellent speech writers and the ability to read the teleprompter. Anyone who thinks Obama (or any other modern politician) is a "great orator" is either intentionally being an idiot or is just another one of the sheeple

      Except that Obama is an ex college professor, wrote 2 bestselling autobiographies, and, oh yeah, has been confirmed to write his own speeches.

      I know you conservatives are upset that reality has such a well known Liberal bias but seriously, come out of the bubble sometime. The talking point about the teleprompter is a non starter outside of the wingnutosphere.

    31. Re:Always a source of amusment by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      I would love to somehow bring Huey P. Long forward in time to this age and had him compete against Obama in the Democratic debates. It would have been a verbal bloodbath the likes of which have never been seen on live TV. Long would have Obama's entrails hanging from the rafters before the end of his opening statement.

    32. Re:Always a source of amusment by berashith · · Score: 1

      it depends on which subset of the media you consider to be the "media" . There is plenty of liberal bias if you look for it. There is plenty of conservative bias if you want to find that.

      I find the mutable definition of mainstream to be absolutely hilarious in regards to the MSM meme.

    33. Re:Always a source of amusment by Milkweed73 · · Score: 1

      I would say that by today's standard not knowing your website "number" is at least as dumb if not dumber than misspelling a word. And Quayle never made the racist remarks that Biden has http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll_goH-aivU.

    34. Re:Always a source of amusment by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Biden is making Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar.

      Bill Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar. Biden makes Dan Quayle look like Bill Clinton?

      That don't make no sense.

    35. Re:Always a source of amusment by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Isn't it neat how people condemn the person given the card instead of the EDUCATOR who gave the card to him?

      Instead? LOL. I blame both, but I only know the name of one of them, which also happens to be the only one in a position of national power and celebrity at the time.

      And sorry, it's a real WTF that either of them couldn't spell.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    36. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's assasination insurance.

      That explains why Pelosi is still third from the Presidency. Backup dundancy.

    37. Re:Always a source of amusment by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Spell? Fuck, he can't count. Not the only time he's been confused by numbers.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    38. Re:Always a source of amusment by Choad+Namath · · Score: 1

      You're right. If it wasn't for teacher's unions, Dan Quayle's stupidity would have remained a secret.

    39. Re:Always a source of amusment by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Uh, what? That's not a debunking, that's a confirmation. He needed a fucking card to spell potato? Nice work there, spanky.

      I bet Quayle knows to capitalize a proper name, even if it's a fake one, there Sparky.

      Kinda sux when someone grammar Nazi's you, doesn't it?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    40. Re:Always a source of amusment by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't it neat how people condemn the person given the card instead of the EDUCATOR who gave the card to him?

      Instead? LOL. I blame both, but I only know the name of one of them, which also happens to be the only one in a position of national power and celebrity at the time.

      And sorry, it's a real WTF that either of them couldn't spell.

      To be fair, Quayle's job was not to educate our children. Never has a national crisis been solved or solvable by the correct spelling of "potato".

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    41. Re:Always a source of amusment by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Pelosi is only "third from the Presidency" if both the President and Vice President die simultaneously. The survivor of the two (P vs. VP) would name a new VP, and if we're lucky Pelosi would never make it that far.

    42. Re:Always a source of amusment by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I bet Quayle knows to capitalize a proper name, even if it's a fake one, there Sparky.

      You have overused commas her.

      Kinda sux when someone grammar Nazi's you, doesn't it?

      "Sux" is not a word. I have capitalized it here anyway to prove that I am paying attention. The "proper" way to say "Nazi's" in this context is Nazis; while in fact it is not a proper form of the word Nazi, in "geek" English it is said that all verbs can be nouned, and all nouns can be verbed. In any case, the apostrophe would denote ownership and is not appropriate here. Finally, I meant "spanky" not as a proper name at all, but in the sense of referring to him as a chronic self-abuser. You could argue all day over whether such a use should be capitalized; I have more interesting things to argue about.

      I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but this one was fun. If you're going to come at me with that grammatical bullshit, perhaps you should be a bit better prepared.

      Amateurs...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:Always a source of amusment by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      But then, that would offend the NEA, and we can't have that shit, now can we?

      It would also be admitting that Quayle wasn't as stupid as he was made out to be, and that would be even worse.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    44. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biden is making Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar

      I don't think anyone could make the guy who wished he knew Latin so he could communicate with people in Latin America look like a Rhodes Scholar.

    45. Re:Always a source of amusment by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Oh yes!

      no
      1/no/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [noh] Show IPA adverb, adjective, noun, plural noes, nos, verb

    46. Re:Always a source of amusment by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      The only reason Biden basically got a free pass during the election was because everyone was either focused on Obama being half black or Palin being a MILF. No one really talked much about McCain or Biden.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    47. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll have you know that after 8 years of a free pass from Bush basically running this country into the ground by the "liberal" media the very idea that the media has any form of "liberal" bias is laughable.

      Just your saying this proves that Slashdot is overwhelmingly liberally-biased and does not allow dissent! Why are you fettering my freedoms? Why are you squelching my viewpoints with your big-government jackboots? Why am I not allowed to speak?

    48. Re:Always a source of amusment by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      because outside of some fabricated scandals, so far, smooth sailing.

      I take it that in "fabricated scandals" you're including the tax problems of appointees (including Secretary of the Treasury, for pete's sake) and the broken campaign promises including telecom immunity?

      I assure you that these are genuine issues for people who care about integrity.

      I know I've read about more on /. but they don't matter so much to me in comparison to the continued mishandling of the money supply - it's literally the biggest scam in the world, but that shit won't hit the fan until the Federal Reserve gets audited.

    49. Re:Always a source of amusment by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I seem to recall that the spelling issue with Quale surfaced when he was trying to correct a high-school kid. Incorrectly. If you can't spell, intelligence requires you to know this and not attempt to start to teach spelling.

    50. Re:Always a source of amusment by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      You forgot to point out that Kinda is not a word either, but I never claimed to be a grammar Nazi. For that matter, I would spell "grammar" wrong if Firefox didn't have a spellchecker installed by default. The closest I ever came to earning an English grad was when I was banging one back in college.

      I was simply pointing out that if you live in glass houses... well, you know the rest.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    51. Re:Always a source of amusment by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      The flaw in your response is that poor spelling doesn't always equate to poor communication. Your use of "thru" is poor spelling, yet I knew exactly what you meant. Your use of "off" in "mode off communication" was poor spelling AND poor communication, and slowed down my parsing of the sentence. I don't think anyone would mistake "potatoe" for an unrelated word.

      Now, you can argue that poor spelling reflects poorly on a person, because in certain circles that is the case, but it's not as simple to nail down as you have implied. Also, one highly publicized spelling error does not make one a poor speller unfit for his chosen profession.

      (Not that I'm in the habit of defending Quayle either. I could care less about the individual...but only a little bit. It's people's perceptions that interest me.)

    52. Re:Always a source of amusment by Zorque · · Score: 1

      Hey, here's a hint: if you use the word "sheeple" you're a huge tool. Hope that helps.

    53. Re:Always a source of amusment by c · · Score: 1

      > I'm truly at a lose when I try to think of anything
      > that man has brought to the ticket.

      Same as Quayle. He's there to discourage anyone from taking a shot at Obama.

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    54. Re:Always a source of amusment by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Quayle's job was not to educate our children. Never has a national crisis been solved or solvable by the correct spelling of "potato".

      Are you forgetting about the time Spelling Beelzebub held a group of tourists hostage at the Smithsonian Natural History Museum in D.C. until the President, VP, and his cabinet correctly answered his spelling questions? "Potato" was in the first round, and imagine the scandal for Kennedy's Presidency if LBJ had botched it and gotten all those people killed.

      Now this was before Quayle's time, and these days most villains consider SB's nefarious plan to make world leaders spell things too embarrassing to repeat. So I'll grant that this was not a significant issue for national security.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    55. Re:Always a source of amusment by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't that he couldn't spell. It was that he wrongly tried to correct the kid. Big difference. If you have limitations, that's fine. To not know your own limitations is a whole 'nother ball of wax.

    56. Re:Always a source of amusment by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >While the sympathetic media reports them as "gaffes" if any Republican said half the stuff that he did

      Bullshit, the media handled all of Bush's gaffes with kid gloves and gave him a free pass on mostly everything for most of his two terms. The idea that the media is liberal is a hilarious conspiracy theory by marginalized conservatives. The people who own the media and make the real decisions on what you hear and believe are hardly liberals, theyre characters like Rupert Murdoch, Rev Moon, and Sam Zell. The hippy media owner only exists in your head. The fact that youre repeating the "liberal media" line is proof at how the well the corporate conservative media operates.

    57. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until Obama ran for president, I literally knew of no one -worth my time- to have as a role model. Glad he made the cut.

    58. Re:Always a source of amusment by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Except that Obama is an ex college professor, wrote 2 bestselling autobiographies, and, oh yeah, has been confirmed to write his own speeches.

      And he *still* needs a teleprompter!!!? Take it away, and he start flubbing. That's some scare shit.

      Granted, he's a fantastic orator with Pied Piper charisma. Then again, so is Rush Limbaugh. But at least Rush doesn't need a teleprompter, speaks five days a week on radio for about 1.5 hours (3 if you include comercials). And last but not least, Rush Limbaugh runs rings around Obama when it comes to intellect and historical facts...even when he is popping pink pills.

      Obama is not the great messiah you think he is.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    59. Re:Always a source of amusment by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I did. Most of the "Biden Gaffes" are either from Conservative wingnut blogs or from the media, but upon further examination, they're complete non-issues.

      It still doesn't discount the fact he's a douche. Now... you might have others convinced he's a fragrant smelling douche, but he's still a douche.

      Nice spin though. I'll give you props for trying at least.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    60. Re:Always a source of amusment by Descalzo · · Score: 1

      Dan Quayle, Ted Kennedy, and Bill Clinton were in a Spelling Bee. Surprisingly, Quayle won! The word was 'harass.' Quayle was the only one who knew it was 1 word.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    61. Re:Always a source of amusment by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      "and, oh yeah, has been confirmed to write his own speeches."

      Obama doesn't write all, or even most of his own speeches, nor is he the only President that's done so. Reagan wrote some of his own, especially before he was elected, and so did Carter and Nixon and Ike. Obama isn't by any means extraordinary in this regard.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    62. Re:Always a source of amusment by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 1

      It's hard to give full credit to Obama for all of these inspiring speeches because he has been caught plagiarizing other speeches before. To my knowledge he has not fessed up to that (not that ANY politician ever fesses up to a mistake). You can see here one of the many examples. Heck, even the famous "Yes We Can" speech was ripped off of Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers from back in 1972.

      Before you go lambasting me as "just another conservative who wants to hate on Obama" just know that I am a registered Independent and have no affiliation with either the Dems or the Reps and just want to vote with as much information as possible.

    63. Re:Always a source of amusment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's deep. Sounds very correct too. I mean, McCain/Palin, right?

  3. So... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone currently have the job of following Biden around at all times with a tape player handy, ready to play the "Whaaah whaaah whhhaaaaaaahhhhh" sound whenever it's needed? Because that sounds like it would be a sweet gig.

    1. Re:So... by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's the Vice President of the United States.

      Surely they can spring for an actual trombonist.

    2. Re:So... by tavaryn · · Score: 1

      I hereby nominate myself for this position, and I'll even throw in Yakety Sax and the failure sound from The Price Is Right for free!

    3. Re:So... by Spazztastic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely they can spring for an actual trombonist.

      I believe they're actually called tromboners.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    4. Re:So... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      heh You said "boners."

    5. Re:So... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      heh You said "boners."

      -1 for not catching the Simpsons reference.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going for humor anyway, why not make it a sackbutter instead?

    7. Re:So... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      -5 for not being able to cope with humour that didn't come from the simpsons!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:So... by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      I would prefer an auxiliary tuba player (tubaist? tubist?) performing the "fail" motif from The Price Is Right: "boom boom ba-doom". Followed thereafter by the trombone cluster: "bowwwwwwww...."

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    9. Re:So... by bozojoe · · Score: 1

      Trombones cost a lot of money to the military.

      I suggest a kazoo, which should work perfectly well against all the wind coming out of our Vice President.

      --
      lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  4. Still Better than Chaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This documentary shows you why Joe Biden is still a better vice president than Dick Chaney.

    1. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another example of how stupid the people are that keep saying that Gov Palin said it, in this example we even have a title that show it was a Saturday Night Live skit.

    2. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... The SNL skit was parodying an answer that Sarah Palin actually gave.

      Sarah Palin's answer was more disturbing and less slightly less funny than the SNL parody, but it's substance was the same.

      citation provided

    3. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Plus, do you really think Sarah Palin would've been a better Veep than Biden? She probably would've tried to convince us to move the VP secret hideout to Wasilla, Alaska, because, you know, she can see Russia from there.

      I seriously hope you were being sarcastic. I only bring it up not just because of your post, but because so many people actually believe that Sarah Palin actually said that when it was actually Tina Fey. Still, it's another fine example of, "if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes true."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Still Better than Chaney by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Still, it's another fine example of, "if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes true."

      Also known as "The Republican Campaign Platform, 1996-2024":

      Reagan was a good president!
      9/11 changed everything!
      The following things are not torture: Beating someone (to death), waterboarding someone (to death), anally raping a boy in front of his parents, hanging someone upside down from the ceiling / walls via cords and hooks (until they lose limbs), putting someone in a 3' box/cage for weeks at a time, throwing poisonous insects and animals inside said cage, preventing someone from sleeping for weeks at a time...
      It's still not torture, and it works, so that means it's vital that you let us keep doing this not-torture!
      Ok, so it's torture, and it doesn't work, but it'd harm our CIA operatives if you investigate it!
      We told Congress all about the Torture, so it's ok!
      We actually got viable intel from torture, so it's ok!
      It was all to prevent a smoking bomb, and totally NOT to try and get fake intel linking Iraq and Al Qaeda!
      Iraq had something, anything to do with 9/11!
      Saudi Arabia didn't have anything to do with 9/11!
      It's not illegal if the president's lawyers say it isn't!
      The Geneva Convention is not binding United States Law!
      They're not prisoners of war, so the Geneva Convention doesn't apply!
      You're either with [Bush] or against [The US]!
      We're compassionate conservatives!
      The United States is a Christian Nation!
      We're the party of fiscal responsibility!
      We're the party of family values!
      We're the party of national security!
      The estate tax isn't fair!
      Obama's going to raise your taxes!
      Teh GAYS are coming to steal yer marriages!!!!11

      Did I miss anything? I'm not fully up to date on my Republican Talking Point lies lately, frankly ever since the election it's been just... too sad to bother giving them any attention.

    5. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, do you really think Sarah Palin would've been a better Veep than Biden? She probably would've tried to convince us to move the VP secret hideout to Wasilla, Alaska, because, you know, she can see Russia from there.

      I seriously hope you were being sarcastic. I only bring it up not just because of your post, but because so many people actually believe that Sarah Palin actually said that when it was actually Tina Fey. Still, it's another fine example of, "if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes true."

      How is this flamebait?

    6. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I'll pick a few here:

      Teh GAYS are coming to steal yer marriages!!!!11

      Never heard this from a Republican

      Obama's going to raise your taxes!

      I smoke. I make under $250,000/yr. My taxes went up. He said they would not.

      The estate tax isn't fair!

      If you own a family farm valued at $500,000, but makes your family $40,000/yr. When you die, your family will have to sell much of that farm to pay the taxes, cutting your annual family revenue down to $30-35k/yr. Can you live on that? Is it fair?

      We're the party of fiscal responsibility!

      I would have agreed with this last year. But since the current party has tripled the deficit, it turns out that it's true!

      They're not prisoners of war, so the Geneva Convention doesn't apply!

      Were any of these guys wearing a uniform? No? then the Geneva Convention does not apply. Why is this so hard to understand?

      Saudi Arabia didn't have anything to do with 9/11!

      The government didn't.

      Reagan was a good president!

      He was.

      9/11 changed everything!

      It did!

      And the one that really proves my point...

      Iraq had something, anything to do with 9/11!

      I have never heard a Republican say this, yet it keeps getting repeated over and over as if it's true. And what do you know, many of the exceedingly ignorant and borderline retarded believe it.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, she did in fact say it.

      Stealing link from AC above:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg

    8. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, she did in fact say it.

      Stealing link from AC above:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokTjEdaUGg

      No, she didn't. The GP falsely stated that Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from Wasilla. Palin never said this. In your link, she never said that. She's never said that she could Russia from her house. She did say that you can see Russia from parts of Alaska, and it turns out that is true.

      However, in your link, Palin did say that Alaska sits between Russia and Canada. Now, I don't know how well you know your geography, but if you wander over a globe, map or even launch Google Earth, you will see that Alaska really does sit between Canada and Russia.

      It's sad when someone says something that is 100% true (and not classified), and gets ridiculed for it by the ignorant.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:Still Better than Chaney by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll pick a few here:

      Teh GAYS are coming to steal yer marriages!!!!11

      Never heard this from a Republican

      You are a liar. Bush's "re-election" (his first actual election) was won primarily because they snuck so many anti-equality laws on the ballots. The bigoted wingnuts came out of the woodwork and voted for Bush while they were there.

      We're the party of fiscal responsibility!

      I would have agreed with this last year. But since the current party has tripled the deficit, it turns out that it's true!

      Yes, I am absolutely certain that Obama, in 100 days, managed to triple the deficit, compared to 8 years of Bush spending like a drunken frat boy.

      I totally believe that, because, apparently, I am an idiot.

      They're not prisoners of war, so the Geneva Convention doesn't apply!

      Were any of these guys wearing a uniform? No? then the Geneva Convention does not apply. Why is this so hard to understand?

      Because I have a soul, and the idea of shoving flashlights up little kid's asses in front of the kid's mother is abhorrent to me.

      Oh, and here's a POW being waterboarded:
      http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-13/cheneys-role-deepens/

      Iraq had something, anything to do with 9/11!

      I have never heard a Republican say this, yet it keeps getting repeated over and over as if it's true. And what do you know, many of the exceedingly ignorant and borderline retarded believe it.

      Liar.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3119676.stm

      http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/
      http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/bush-team-peddles-911-iraq-link-torture
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-durang/lieberman-peddles-the-old_b_77198.html
      http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10164478
      http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0511/S00247.htm
      http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0321-02.htm

      Not only that, it turns out we were torturing people to death and shoving flashlights up children's bums specifically to try and GET a fake link between Iraq and 9/11. Whoops!

    10. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Loadmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I posted a mea culpa and you are right.

      It's ridiculed, because what she said didn't make much sense. She was asked if she had foreign policy experience. Being in close proximity to a foreign country does not count. Maybe the reason Fey's statement is linked so much to the actual statement is because it was a good summation.

      It doesn't particularly matter. Politicians say dumb things.

    11. Re:Still Better than Chaney by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      I'm only going to quibble with one of these because it's so dead obvious: Dick Cheney is a Republican. He claimed Iraq trained Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11th. Dick Cheney made the link between Iraq and 9/11.

    12. Re:Still Better than Chaney by steelfood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh, true, but it's the same as noting that the sky is blue when asking what the weather outside is like: it's completely irrelevant. Sure you can see Russia from parts of Alaska. So what does that have to do with foreign policy experience? And I'm sure Alaska geographically sits between Canada and Russia. But again, where does foreign policy come into play?

      She could have, when mentioning Canada, bring up examples of resource disputes and such with the Canadian government. But no, it seems she decided to imply that Alaska's geographical location has some relevance to foreign policy, which is in and of itself, ridiculous.

      But the specifics of her statments doesn't really matter overall. That she doesn't realize that she's made a nonsensical remark by failing to further clarify or otherwise specify her comments is even more telling than the fact that she made the comment.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      You are a liar. Bush's "re-election" (his first actual election) was won primarily because they snuck so many anti-equality laws on the ballots. The bigoted wingnuts came out of the woodwork and voted for Bush while they were there.

      You mean like when Bush signed the "Defense of Marriage Act"? Oh wait...

      Still, I've never heard a Republican say that "Teh GAYS are coming to steal yer marriages!!!!11", and you've had two chances to provide such a link.

      I'm going to leave most of the rest alone since you don't understand the definition of a POW, as defined by the Geneva convention and you can only site sources that are shady at best. Salon.com? There's a reliable, fair news source. Still, all Salon talked about was Abu Ghraib, which had nothing to do with Republicans. For that matter, Republicans prosecuted those involved. Wait, how am I the liar again?

      Iraq had something, anything to do with 9/11!

      I have never heard a Republican say this, yet it keeps getting repeated over and over as if it's true. And what do you know, many of the exceedingly ignorant and borderline retarded believe it.

      Liar.

      Let's see, from the VERY FIRST SENTENCE of you BBC link:


      Mr Bush has never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington...

      Uh, I'm sorry, how am I a liar again? You say that Republicans said Iraq had something to do with 9/11, then provide a link that says that they never did. Hmmm. Sounds like your own link proved that one of us is lying here, and evidently, it's not me.

      Granted, the rest of the sentence does say that somehow "he has repeatedly associated the two", and then gives a few quotes that really have nothing to do with it. For example, here is a Bush quote from the article:

      Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror.

      Saddam's Iraq paid $20,000 to families of Palestinian suicide bombers. That is what was meant and cited as how Saddam supported terror.

      Here's another that is closer, but still no link:

      Before 11 September 2001, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents and lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons, and other plans - this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take just one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known.

      Hmmm. Still doesn't say Saddam had anything to do with 9-11. Bush is referring to a Russian intelligence report Putin forwarded to Bush:

      Russian President Vladimir Putin said yesterday that his intelligence service had warned the Bush administration before the U.S. invasion of Iraq that Saddam Hussein's government was planning attacks against U.S. targets both inside and outside the country.

      There are several more quotes about Iraq training and/or harboring terrorists, which were true. Still, nothing that shows that Iraq had anything to with 9-11. For that matter, the BBC and several of sources go out of their way to mention that Bush NEVER said that Iraq had anything to with it. The BBC even says, "US President George W Bush has explicitly stated for the first time that there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks." That's kinda the exact opposite of saying that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9-11 attacks and the exact opposite of what you accuse Republicans of doing... FROM YOUR OWN SOURCE!

      The rest of your links are pretty much a joke. Huffington post? Please! That's not a source. It's a blog by CELEBRITIES! Give me a break. The scoop.com link talks about

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    14. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Wait! Here is the part from your salon.com link:

      Hersh gave a speech last week to the ACLU making the charge that children were sodomized in front of women in the prison, and the Pentagon has tape of it.

      So that's it? A guy made a speech to the ACLU and says it so it must be true? Seriously, just because you WANT to believe it, doesn't make it true, moron! People give speeches that say aliens from outer space were the real culprits behind 9-11. Other people give speeches that say souls were flown to earth on 747's by Xenu.

      Just because someone says it in a speech doesn't make it true. Still, I shouldn't to tell you that, but it does prove the point that I keep making: "If you repeat a lie long enough, it becomes the truth."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    15. Re:Still Better than Chaney by dennypayne · · Score: 2, Informative

      She's (rightly) ridiculed for it because it wasn't a geography quiz, it was her response to inquiries about her foreign policy experience. Only someone trying to put some sort of positive spin on Sarah Palin would defend her saying this. It was a laughably dumb response, "100% true" or not.

      --
      Erecting the wall of separation between church and state is absolutely essential in a free society. - Thomas Jefferson
    16. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot.

    17. Re:Still Better than Chaney by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      The bigoted wingnuts came out of the woodwork and voted for Bush while they were there.

      Would these be the same wingnuts who voted for both Obama and Proposition 8 this time around?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    18. Re:Still Better than Chaney by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, I posted a mea culpa and you are right."

      Good on you, Load. That's all too rare around here.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    19. Re:Still Better than Chaney by Draek · · Score: 1

      Dunno, to me it sounds just like if you were asked whether you have experience dealing with ignorant, incompetent management and you answered "I work in IT".

      Which, for the thickheaded among us, means the answer is "yes, every single day of my life".

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    20. Re:Still Better than Chaney by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I posted a mea culpa and you are right.

      It's ridiculed, because what she said didn't make much sense. She was asked if she had foreign policy experience. Being in close proximity to a foreign country does not count. Maybe the reason Fey's statement is linked so much to the actual statement is because it was a good summation.

      It doesn't particularly matter. Politicians say dumb things.

      Sorry, I just get frustrated due to certain "untruths" that are repeated enough to be assumed try by the ignorant public. Sarah Palin said, "I can see Russia from my house!", GWBush banned all stem cell research, GWBush said that Iraq was responsible for 9-11, GWBush stole Florida, and Dick Cheney leaked Valerie Plame's name are just a couple of examples of items that have stuck in the publics mind and are accepted as truth, even though they are simply not true.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  5. So? by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if this is accurate -- which, given the source, I kinda doubt -- so freakin' what? Looks like /. is taking a page from the Fark playbook and posting flamebait worthy articles to drum up page clicks.

    1. Re:So? by Lightwarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a big deal if he divulged information that was actually classified. The nature of the information is less important.

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    2. Re:So? by thesazi · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:So? by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      +1. Taco must be fishing for clicks to post this tripe outside of the already worthless "Politics" section.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    4. Re:So? by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Informative

      except its not, its been well known for 6 years that there was a bunker there. The BBC even reported on its construction and they had to pay damaged for blasting. In fact in all honesty pretty much everyone, even the badguys know there are bunkers under the residence of major staff members. The secret is how to get to them what kind of security they have, not that they exist.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because fallout 3 is an abomination.

    6. Re:So? by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      Even if this is accurate -- which, given the source, I kinda doubt -- so freakin' what? Looks like /. is taking a page from the Fark playbook and posting flamebait worthy articles to drum up page clicks.

      you're just miffed it makes your sig look silly.

    7. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except its not, its been well known for 6 years that there was a bunker there. The BBC even reported on its construction and they had to pay damaged for blasting. In fact in all honesty pretty much everyone, even the badguys know there are bunkers under the residence of major staff members. The secret is how to get to them what kind of security they have, not that they exist.

      You are wrong. The "secret" is not only the security, but what is actually at the location. By giving away what is in the site, you cancel out the point of being secret in the first place.

      Nothing is secure with modern technology and weapons, so being unable to get intel on something provides an information black out when it comes to finding what you are looking for. There are many bunkers and the like scattered within short distance of the area in question, but to specifically point out the purpose and use of this specific one undermines the effectiveness of the others.

      Think of it as a demented game of whack a mole. If you know which hole the targets in and going to pop out of, hitting it because much easier.

    8. Re:So? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      No I haven't. And some of those bunkers are designed to survive a nuclear attack, as long as it's not a direct hit with a weapon fused for a ground burst. It might be hell on Earth to be there; but, they will be alive. I've said enough...

    9. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like it was a 'casual' conversation and he was showing off...

      Let me tell you about the guys I know who 'know things'. They say 'You can find this information out pretty easy if you just dig a bit. But *I* am not supposed to tell you. I swore an oath, and signed a statement, which I can go to jail if I give you this information.'

      It does not set a good example for the people who work for him if he 'gives away secrets that are known.' What about when it comes time for real secrets? What about the people who work for him? 'hey the boss does it'...

      That is why you keep he should keep his mouth shut. Even if it is 'known'.

    10. Re:So? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      right that works. erm unless everybody fucking knows about the bunker anyway. since 2002

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    11. Re:So? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Um, it happened, and it's classified information. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you're looking through blue-colored glasses.

  6. Government Transparency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now THAT is how government transparency is done!

    1. Re:Government Transparency by CambodiaSam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is one of the reasons I voted FOR Obama/Biden. After the Bush administration, I kinda like the idea of getting a random nugget of insider information delivered this way. It's totally unfiltered! Sure, it's not the best way, and definitely not safe, but it's better than nothing.

      I also figure that the handlers around Biden will begin limiting his access to really sensitive stuff. So I'm enjoying the fun while it lasts. Perhaps he can get his hands on some Area 51 stuff and attend a convention where he decides to "dispel some rumors" by explaining that there are no aliens, just some cool anti-gravity stuff...

    2. Re:Government Transparency by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for his handlers to start exploiting him by using him to disseminate misinformation, like Schwarzkopf used CNN to convince Saddam that the main invasion was coming by sea in Gulf 1.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  7. Old USNO ? by mbone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The old US Naval Observatory was located in Foggy Bottom, just across from where the Kennedy Center is now. If you are coming in from Virginia across the Roosevelt Bridge, you can see at one point the old dome for the 26 inch telescope, where Hall discovered the moons of Mars.

    This site is now the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery for the Navy. I bet that the article is referring to a bunker at Observatory Circle.

    1. Re:Old USNO ? by CByrd17 · · Score: 1

      No, I think that the summary just assumes that the residence of the VP is not also the current Naval Observatory. In fact, they are both on the same complex, and the Naval Observatory is in use.

    2. Re:Old USNO ? by mbone · · Score: 1

      Quite true. The VP's house is (inside the USNO) known as "Quarters A" - there are 7 (IIRC) other Quarters at the USNO, 6 houses for Admirals and one for the on-site Navy facility manager.

      Quarters A was build for the USNO Superintendent, was occupied by the Navy CNO for a long time, and taken over for the VP in the 1970's. Note in each case a higher rank bumped the previous occupant.

  8. I wonder what his Secret Service nickname is? by chill · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Tricky Dick" has been used, and it certainly doesn't fit this guy.

    "What a fucking moron" fits, but it is too generic. You could be referring to almost everyone in the Federal government.

    "Dopey" might be a nice fit. Maybe we can get Disney to sue him for copyright violation.

    Suggestions?

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:I wonder what his Secret Service nickname is? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I have a buddy, his father is retired SS. At a BBQ a couple weeks ago, he referred to him as "plugs". Of course, he also referred to "nig-nog", so take it with a grain of salt.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:I wonder what his Secret Service nickname is? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      I've always thought he looks like a good Sith Lord. Is "Sith Lord Stupid" taken???

    3. Re:I wonder what his Secret Service nickname is? by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

      We (my family) call him "Fishy Joe" - which comes from the purveyor of a fast-food seafood chain on Futurama.

    4. Re:I wonder what his Secret Service nickname is? by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1
  9. So? by thewiz · · Score: 0

    Look, it doesn't matter if the whole world knows where Biden's hideout is; after all, if there is a nuclear attack on the east coast not much will be left.

    Haven't any of you been playing Fallout 3?

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  10. Nice to see them carrying another torch... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Clearly the Bush Administration's respect for classified information has continued in the Obama Administration!

    (For the sarcasm-impaired, I DO know that the Bush Administration had no more respect for classified information than Biden is demonstrating here.)

    1. Re:Nice to see them carrying another torch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you have any instructions for the people that got the irony but still think your comment sucked?

    2. Re:Nice to see them carrying another torch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh- burn. Mind if I write that down for later use?

  11. Huh? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somehow it's a major gaffe and security lapse to let on that there's a secure bunker under the official residence of the Vice President? I think if you'd asked me if there was one before reading this story, I'd just have assumed so.

    Sorry, this is making a story out of basically nothing. I think Biden's kind of a putz sometimes, but this is just kinda bullshitty.

    1. Re:Huh? by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, what next... revealing the existence of a secret bunker under the White House?!

    2. Re:Huh? by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

      I am shocked that there is a bunker under the US Vice Presidents residence. Here in Finland all bigger structures require bunkers by law. Quote from Wikipedia:

      Finland has over 40,000 air-raid shelters which can house 3.8 million persons (71% of the population). Private homes rarely have them, but houses over 600 square meters are obligated to build them. Fire inspectors check the shelters every 10 years and flaws have to be repaired or corrected as soon as possible. The law requires that inhabitants of apartment blocks can clear the shelters and put them into action in less than 24 hours. Also, the shelters must possess a working phone line connection that must be usable at all times.

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    3. Re:Huh? by SockPuppet_9_5 · · Score: 1

      OMG! You just totally screwed over the Sooper Sekret security arrangements of the Secret Service! Now everybody knoas!

    4. Re:Huh? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is making a story out of basically nothing.

      Next up on slashdot, Biden reveals the top secret name of the president's aircraft is "air force one".

      Followed up by "don't tell anybody, but there's gold at ft knox"

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't really matter whether or not you "think" the information is relevant or not. A Vice President blundering and blurting out classified information is an embarrassment to the administration. He has no business being number 2 in line for the Presidency. I pray to God nothing happens to render President Obama incapacitated.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no. First we discover there really is a basement at the Alamo. And there's a stolen bicycle in it.

    7. Re:Huh? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between assuming it's there and someone directly stating it as fact. The difference can get you serious prison time. For example: Decades later, if I ask my father, "Are there nuclear weapons at the Naval Weapons Station?" he would say "I can neither confirm, nor deny the existance of nuclear weapons..." Yet, it's reasonable to assume that there are probably nuclear weapons stored there from time to time, if not all the time.

    8. Re:Huh? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      We are lucky in that the continental US has never been bombed (in recent memory). We had a period of paranoia in the '50's where people built small "fall-out shelter" that, it turns out, would have been fairly in-effective. I expect, one day, we might have to amend our thinking. For now, we have the benefit of two oceans to protect us (note that I don't really consider the Chinese or Russians to be a threat, because, economics aside, it would be pure insanity for any two of the us to go to war with each other)

    9. Re:Huh? by samkass · · Score: 1

      Actually, the US mainland was bombed during World War 2. Just extremely ineffectively. The Japanese launched thousands of hydrogen-filled balloons into the jetstream with tiny bombs during WWII, and a few hundred made it to North America, killing 6 people and causing a small amount of damage.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_balloon

      But still, yeah I'd have been amazed if the Vice-President's house hadn't had a bunker beneath it.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    10. Re:Huh? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      There's a bunker under a lot of buildings. You're missing the point. The point is that when we had a huge emergency, that's where the VP stayed. The other point is that this is classified information. If it is misclassified, we can complain about that, I guess. But you can't divulge classified information, and individuals can't be tasked with deciding what "really should be classified" and what is "classified but OK to blab to the public about."

    11. Re:Huh? by Scott+Francis[Mecham · · Score: 1

      The bunker's not so secret, but the robot suit and the hidden hangar for Air Force One..oh..er..damn.

      --
      --
    12. Re:Huh? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what next... revealing the existence of a secret bunker under the White House?!

      Damn you! You just had to go and blurt it out, didn't you?

      Do you have any idea what it's going to cost to relocate the White House over a different secret bunker now?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Huh? by WindShadow · · Score: 1

      You mean the bad guys didn't notice the truckloads of rubble being taken out, the blasting (neighbors complaints made the papers), and the fact that he made public appearances and then went to his "secure location" without leaving the building?

      There is no way the bad guys didn't know there was a bunker under the VP house, because the public knew. There might be doubt about the existance or location of other secure locations, and where the VP is at some given time, but bus tours for tourists supposedly announced "that's where the new bunker is being built."

      Not "top secret," not "confidential," but "common knowledge."

  12. Fair and Balanced by carou · · Score: 1

    Yes, if there's one North American politician of the last decade who's been well-known for his verbal gaffes, the first name to leap to mind is of course none other than Joe Biden.

    1. Re:Fair and Balanced by inKubus · · Score: 1

      It's STRATEGERY! Mission Accomplished!

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Fair and Balanced by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Yes, if there's one North American politician of the last decade who's been well-known for his verbal gaffes, the first name to leap to mind is of course none other than Joe Biden.

      But if there are two politicians, Biden would be second.

  13. Title title is wrong by mikemulvaney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It should read, "Biden reveals location of Vice President's House". I lived in DC for a long time, and I'm pretty sure every one there knows where the Vice President lives.

    This is the worst article I've seen on slashdot in a long time. Not only is the content nonsensical, most of the submission is copied directly from the foxnews "article", but it doesn't have quotes around the copied text.

    1. Re:Title title is wrong by Keebler71 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except the article says "old Naval Observatory" which is about 2 miles from the new Naval Observatory where the VP lives.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    2. Re:Title title is wrong by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. Biden was probably wrong.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    3. Re:Title title is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, how else are we Slashdotters going to whine endlessly about Obama, Biden, Democrats, and lib'ruls???

  14. Just imagine by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    That's nothing. Just imagine what Cheney didn't tell us!

    --
    stuff |
  15. and Cheney and Osama Ben Laden are... by BrentRJones · · Score: 2, Funny

    down there right now playing poker and smoking weed

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  16. Stupid article by DnemoniX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Excuse me, but it isn't a secret when EVERYONE already knows guys. If you didn't know, you must have missed the news regarding all of the construction at the house when Dick was in residence. All of the neighbors complaining about the round the clock heavy equipment use making the ground shake. That is when everyone was saying that they were probably expanding/renovating the bunker under the house.

    But hey, keep the non-news coming.

    1. Re:Stupid article by zer0that · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Stupid article by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Clue #1: The entire population of the world, much less the United States, does not live within shockwave distance of Washington, D.C. I know this must come as a shock to you, but check this shit out:

      During WWII, anyone who came to see FDR could clearly see that he was parapalegic and therefore unworthy of the presidency. Compare and contrast: the effect of widely publishing FDR's disability / versus / agreeing with the mainstream media in order to intentonally supress the news.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  17. Open Secret is right by gfineman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Open secret is right. I live about three quarters of a mile from the Naval Observatory and the government had to pay for damage, caused by the blasting, to the foundations of nearby residences (including at least one embassy). The local community governmental organization gathered and disseminated the procedures for getting such payments. Why is this considered news and even in Slashdot?

    1. Re:Open Secret is right by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be fair and balanced. We made fun of the Bush administration for being incompetent on secrets, so we have to make fun of the Obama administration for similar reasons.

      It's sort of like when the press pretends like the opposition to rights for GLBT is based upon something other than pure bigotry or that there's a constitutional protection for interfering in other people's lives for bigoted reasons.

    2. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not PC to say that Obama is a better president than Bush. It hurts the conservatives' feelings, and we can't have that.

    3. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All depends on what "rights" for GLBT you are talking about. If you refer to freedom of speech and others from the Bill of Rights, sure that would imply pure bigotry. On the other hand, opposing rights newly "discovered" that no judge from 50+ years ago, let alone the founding fathers or others writing the laws/amendments would have possibly construed as being there is not bigoted, it is respect for the rule of law. As far as I am aware (and there may be some small exception somewhere in time and space) until 50 years ago, nowhere in the world were things like gay marriage even considered. Thus claiming that to be some sort of universal right seems rather silly. I'm not saying that it should be denied if a state (like Vermont) enacts the proper legislation for it, but suing for the 'right' to gay marriage or trying to have the courts overturn an amendment barring it (California, I'm looking at you) is cynical manipulation of the legal system and just plain wrong.

    4. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's sort of like when the press pretends like the opposition to rights for GLBT is based upon something other than pure bigotry or that there's a constitutional protection for interfering in other people's lives for bigoted reasons.

      Or sort of like when all people that don't agree with your opinion, lifestyle, morals, or ideas must be bigots, hate mongers and dolts?

    5. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's dead clever. You get the decoy Veep "secret residence" and you get to make compromising modifications to "nearby" embassies.

      Or it would be if that was the plan....

    6. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit premature to say that Obama is a better president than Bush. His image is unquestionably better, but the proof is in the policy.

      Looks to me like his foreign policy is a continuation of Bush's, for although he makes nice with other countries (a welcome change) he shows no sign of actually leaving Iraq, and plenty of signs that more troops will be sent to Afghanistan and Pakistan (against the will of Pakistan, I might add).

      Looks to me like his economic policy is a continuation of Bush's, for although he claims deregulation caused the meltdown, in reality it is nearly a century of the (private) Federal Reserve bank fucking with our money that enabled each successive bubble, and his answer to this problem is to create 1,300 billion new dollars by allowing the Fed to continue its debasement of the currency.

      Sure, his social policy is better - stem cells, abortions, and gay marriage - but that's small comfort when western society is in decline.

    7. Re:Open Secret is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, they are hate mongers and bigots. There really isn't any valid reason for opposing hate crimes legislation and equal rights. It's sort of like when the klan complains about reverse discrimination because they're not allowed to engage in the sort of bigotry that they wish to.

    8. Re:Open Secret is right by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's no "right to marriage" in the Constitution at all, not for gays, not for straight people.

      But perhaps you've heard these words? "Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness".

    9. Re:Open Secret is right by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Come on guys it's been a while now. We can safely admit that even Michael Jackson would have been a better President than Bush.

  18. You call that a leak?! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    Here in the UK, HM Gov has so many holes in its' intelligence services that council-employed signmakers know where our shelters are!

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:You call that a leak?! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      BTW for anyone wondering the bunker in question was declassified and is now a tourist attraction but for whatever reason they still use "secret" in the name.

      http://www.hackgreen.co.uk/Opening_Times/opening_times.htm

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  19. That's what they *want* us to think by Snorfalorpagus · · Score: 1

    Better than having your enemy not know where you are is to have them *think* they know where you are.

  20. Consider the source... by rnturn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The report did come from Faux News, after all. They're not exactly known for their impartiality. When was the last time they reported anything positive about a Democrat? (Other than a story about a Democrat that disagrees with the majority of other Democrats.)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Consider the source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey genius:

      http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2009/05/15/shining-light-on-cheney-s-hideaway.aspx

    2. Re:Consider the source... by dinsdale3 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the last time CNN/MSNBC/NBC/ABC/CBS/PBS reported anything positive about a Republican? (Other than a story about a Republican that disagrees with the majority of other Republicans.)

    3. Re:Consider the source... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Troll

      You don't really speak French, do you?

      Faux is not pronounced like "Fox", it's pronounced "Foe". It's not a witty play on words, it's a public demonstration of your ignorance about the words you use.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Consider the source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard anyone call it Faux News? (and pronounce it properly?) What rock do you live under, Alabama?

    5. Re:Consider the source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone's butthurt over their favorite 'news' channel being cut down. Fortunately, I too have some clarification for your simple mind, fuckstick. "Faux" in this case is pronounced "fawkes" to maintain relationship to the original "Fox" while appearing identical to the French word for 'fake' when put into text or type. Read that through a few times if you have some trouble absorbing it all at once.

    6. Re:Consider the source... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      The report did come from Faux News, after all. They're not exactly known for their impartiality. When was the last time they reported anything positive about a Democrat? (Other than a story about a Democrat that disagrees with the majority of other Democrats.)

      First, your question should be, "Why is Fox News the only media outlet reporting this?"

      The last time Fox (the correct spelling) said something positive about a Democrat was probably right around the time that any other news agency said something positive about a Republican.

      But let's go ahead and hammer Fox News anyway. Completely ignoring the Freedom of the Press guaranteed by the Constitution, there should not be any opposition to the current administration allowed. All such voices not towing the party line should be shut down immediately.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Consider the source... by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      First, your question should be, "Why is Fox News the only media outlet reporting this?"

      Well, no, first your question should be "Is Fox news is the only media outlet reporting this," which it isn't. If you'd bothered to read the article, you'd notice the "gaffe" was initially reported by a person from Newsweek (see here for the original story).

      Fox does seem to be the only media outlet making a big deal about it. I think that's probably because it's not actually important or newsworthy in any significant sense, and Fox mostly has an agenda to pursue in terms of pointing out every insignificant thing anyone in the Obama administration does with an eye to trying to make them look bad. For example, all the silliness with Michelle Obama touching the Queen, or Barack Obama shaking hands with Hugo Chavez at (*gasp*) a diplomatic meeting.

    8. Re:Consider the source... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      "Faux" in this case is pronounced "fawkes" to maintain relationship to the original "Fox" while appearing identical to the French word for 'fake' when put into text or type.

      Yes, I understand the failed witticism. Faux is a French word. It is pronounced like "Foe", to bend it to fit only puts one's ignorance on display.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  21. It didn't have a secure bunker before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? I would have expected it to have had a secure bunker installed a long time ago. I don't mean Greenbrier type bunker but something substantial that would take care of the most obvious emergencies.

  22. Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps it's a diversion. "Yeah, we're hiding in this bunker here. Bomb this one." while all the time they're somewhere else entirely.

    1. Re:Genius by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or perhaps they want us to think that. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Genius by wisty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it's just a broom closet. The secret service just tell Biden to practice "covering" in there whenever they need a break from him.

    3. Re:Genius by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Maybe it's just a broom closet. The secret service just tell Biden to practice "covering" in there whenever they need a break from him.

      They give him a nice bicycle helmet to play with, too.

  23. Since when was it secret? by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    If the bbc could figure out it was there from reporters on the ground, outside of a secure zone, I'm fairly certain Russia, China, et al., knew exactly what was going on from spy satellites. You know... the people that this would actually be relevant to.

  24. Hmmm by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    $10 says he isn't Obama's running mate next election.

    1. Re:Hmmm by macshit · · Score: 1

      $10 says he isn't Obama's running mate next election.

      I don't see why not -- Biden's actually been a pretty good vice president, and if anything is more respected and valued now than he was when he was selected as Obama's running mate.

      Silly Fox News non-stories and bizarro Republican whinging are not a very good basis on which to judge someone...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  25. not so secret, and not so secure by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2559617.stm Seems the BBC revealed the "secret" location long before Biden. Yet another Fox news lets make a story out of nothing event.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:not so secret, and not so secure by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Because Biden is an elected official and *not* a member of the press. Besides, it was only a "rumor" in the way it was reported by the BBC. Biden's comments pretty much solidified it. That's what's important here and thus all that matters.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:not so secret, and not so secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2559617.stm

      Seems the BBC revealed the "secret" location long before Biden. Yet another Fox news lets make a story out of nothing event.

      This BBC article is the equivalent to speculation about activity at Area 51. You are comparing an interesting yet unsubstantiated rumor with the VP announcing the location publicly. Until he revealed the location, it was just speculation. We can speculate about where the nukes in Pakistan are, based on our best intel and rumors or we can hope that Asif Ali Zardari will casually mention it during a dinner party.

  26. Not surprising by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

    I'd be more surprised if there weren't a bunker under the VP's residence.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. News has already reported there was a bunker by Kagato · · Score: 1

    When the reports of neighbors complaining there was dynamite being set off at the residence for construction everyone pretty much knew it was for a bunker. It's been assume for 6 years now.

  29. Made by vault-tech by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this the vault where all the clones go nuts and kill everyone or the one with the virus that makes all the super mutants?

    1. Re:Made by vault-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the vault where all the clones go nuts and kill everyone or the one with the virus that makes all the super mutants?

      its the vault where you hide when robots drop our own a-bombs on us, robots that time travel and insure their own "victory"

    2. Re:Made by vault-tech by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, Gary!

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Made by vault-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the one with the sound weapon and violin.

  30. And this is a problem, how? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    And this is a problem, how?

    Did anyone think there was NOT some nearby secure location?

    Now if he'd added "and of course there are three escape tunnels surfacing at hidden helipads at X, Y, and Z," THEN maybe it would be a goof.

    1. Re:And this is a problem, how? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Secret helipads? You mean like, grassy knolls?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. You want to know where this stuff is? by RingDev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ask the pizza delivery drivers.

    No joke, I was assigned to a tactical response unit while I was in the Marine Corps. I can't discuss much of the specifics, but we would get locked up in a highly secure facility just out side of Washington in case of an "emergency". The existence of the facility at the time was considered top secret.

    Unfortunately, the local staff would often order out for food, and have it delivered.

    So the secret wasn't all that secret, and is even less so now, seeing as how /. is posting about it.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Bullshit flag on play! This is one of the most enduring urban legends within the military and intelligence communities. Sorry. Fail.

    2. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the local staff would often order out for food, and have it delivered.

      So you have a choice between stale crackers and ration bars stashed there by civil defense in 1959 OR you could order a pizza and have it delivered. Which one would you choose?

    3. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Torchwood :)

    4. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well hold on.

      If your team is at a secure facility, I presume the fact that the team is there is the secret? (And not that the building itself is somehow invisible...)

      Unless you order your food by identifying yourselves "Hi, this is Joey from the Bravo squad of the 1st Forecon, er, DRP of the MARSOC, and we're down as 123 Elm Street and need the usual, please" I doubt that ordering pizza is somehow blowing operational security.

      How would anyone know that they're delivering pizza to your unit, and not just to the janitor(s)?

      (Terrorist leader watches Dominoes.com website carefully: "AHA! We've found the dirty American imperialist commandoes! Nobody in this city orders cinnamon twists AND cheesy bread! It *must* be the Americans! Muhahahah!")

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      It depends on the nature of the building. I've worked in buildings that, from the outside, look like little more than large hills, with the entrance carefully hidden. Ordering pizza to be delivered there would be grounds for an Article 13.

      If you're just working in a secure room or floor of an otherwise-normal building, though, yeah, you can get food delivered, at least to the quarterdeck.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      "quarterdeck" means "the lobby," for those of you who haven't ever worked with Marines :)

      They're a cool bunch, if you are sitting in a conference room in very dry downtown Los Angeles and tell them all to sit by the "aft bulkhead", they'll know exactly what wall you're talking about.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    7. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      You worked in the Shire? That's pretty awesome.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:You want to know where this stuff is? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      they used to joke that you could identify high-level meetings at the pentagon by who came to the door to get the pizza--if it was a full colonel, you knew something important was going on.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
  32. Biden reveals what everyone has already known... by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    that he's an idiot.

  33. He brought the experienced old white guy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. Obama had the diversity thing down. That's good, however there are many voters who that sort of thing worries. They find comfort in "experience". in politics, that means an old white guy. You can argue they shouldn't care, but they do. Yes, even democrats. That's what Biden brought. He also brought connections to special interest groups, who are powerful in terms of elections. Obama himself didn't have many of those connections, since he is a young politician. Biden on the other hand is deep within Hollywood's pocket, among others.

    Now I'm sure to you these aren't bonus points and I'm not saying they are for me either. Just saying that's what they brought to Obama. McCain had the experienced, old white guy thing down. That was one thing he could sell really strongly: "I know about politics and war. I've been there, and done that. You can trust me to make decisions from a position of experience." Biden was to help balance that.

    Same deal with Palin on the other side. McCain brought her in for two reasons:

    1) To solidify the fundy base. The fundies were none too happy with his nomination. They wanted another fundy president and deluded themselves in to thinking the nation would go with it. So there was a real risk of losing them. No, they wouldn't vote for Obama, but they might get disenfranchised and not vote. Palin cemented them in for McCain.

    2) To get the diversity vote. A young, and rather attractive, female. Goes well to deal with Obama's diversity. This is doubly true since there were women's groups that were bitter about Clinton losing. Stupid, but they really did vote for McCain because he chose a female vice president.

    Of course what McCain didn't count on was that she was as big a nit wit as she is, and that the press would give her so much play. Normally vice presidents are rather non-entities. They are picked for the reason I stated: To make the president look good in various ways with various groups. However the media really let Palin have it and gave her a chance to sit her foot firmly in her mouth. Gave plenty of people pause when they realized how crazy she was.

    1. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      They find comfort in "experience". in politics

      I don't. Experience in politics to me just means a sociopath who has hidden the internal monster better than most, and hasn't gotten caught in whatever shenanigans he or she is most assuredly engaging.

      Me? Cynical? Nah! The rest of you lot are too trusting.

    2. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by dachshund · · Score: 1

      Of course what McCain didn't count on was that she was as big a nit wit as she is, and that the press would give her so much play.

      Which is why he shouldn't have picked an unvetted candidate in order to win a few popularity points before the Convention. The point of a candidacy is to convince voters that you can be trusted to make important decisions. McCain's damning sin isn't that he lost his gamble, it's that he took one in the first place.

    3. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Informative

      He also brought connections to special interest groups, who are powerful in terms of elections. Obama himself didn't have many of those connections, since he is a young politician. [Politician I don't like] on the other hand is deep within Hollywood's pocket, among others.

      Can we get off the old saw about corruption in politics? Biden is one of the poorest members of the senate despite being one of the most senior. Obama has more money.

      The Hollywood part is amusing. Delaware politics revolves more around the disposal of chicken shit than it does around Hollywood. The last movie of any significance filmed in Delaware was Fight Club.

      Biden is the Democratic senior member of the foreign relations committee. He presided over Bill Clinton's foreign policy, which has been widely seen as more successful than Dubya, who hadn't even been to Europe before he became president (why do we need "experience" in quotes?)

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    4. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY. Apropos of what you think of Repubs, what you think of Palin, what in the holy hell was McCain thinking when he okayed this? While I think the D's would still have won, I think it'd have been a lot closer without Palin in the picture.

    5. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Biden is the Democratic senior member of the foreign relations committee. He presided over Bill Clinton's foreign policy, which has been widely seen as more successful than Dubya, who hadn't even been to Europe before he became president (why do we need "experience" in quotes?)

      What was successful about Bill Clinton's foreign policy? Was it the support for Boris Yeltsin even when he was a drunk? Was it picking the wrong side in the Balkans war? Was it all those failed peace agreements? Or perhaps it was the birth of record trade deficits (that admittedly even Bush could not deal with).

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's nothing more awful than a civil administrator who knows what they're doing. They're all sellouts and frauds, what our country needs is One Strong Man to bring us order./snarky

      This cynicism thing is sorta the easy way out, and when the people in democracies presume all their leaders are liars, without actually making the effort to figure out who is and who isn't, tyranny is the final result. Hitler promised to kill all the jews and start a war to reclaim Germany's "place in the sun" in Mein Kampf, in the 1920s, and everybody just assumed he was another lying politician.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    7. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Which is why he shouldn't have picked an unvetted candidate in order to win a few popularity points before the Convention.

      She is a governor. There was the presumption that there would be some assumption of competence because she is a governor, and that there would be some actual competence because of that as well. However, she was elected governor because she ran on the "I'm a Republican that hates Republicans" ticket. Really. Seems like half of the Republicans in Alaska are under investigation for corruption of some kind, with convictions trickling in and prosecutors picked by other Republicans, so it isn't a witch hunt. And popular Democrats win Senate seats by only a few hundred votes over convicted felons, losing in almost all other elections. So when it was one good ol' boy and her as the front runners for the Republicans, people voted for her because she at least wasn't corrupt. And, in the general election, even with one of the stronger Democratic candidates and a number of Republicans running as independents because Republicans hate Palin here, she still pulled off a relatively easy victory. And it wasn't because she was expected to improve Russian-Alaskan foreign policy.

      In Alaska, we don't vet our candidates. We have city council members that are business owners that make decisions on businesses (when they should recuse themselves) and decide obviously in a manner to personally help themselves to the detriment of most of the rest of the city. That's expected. We have bridges to nowhere. We have Republicans bragging about how much federal money we waste in the state. Yes, the "conservative" party brags about federal waste they directly cause. We are like a whole different country.

    8. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was successful about Bill Clinton's foreign policy

      He didn't say he was great, he said he was better than Bush, and frankly that's not hard. At least Clinton didn't "look into Putin's soul" and see what a great guy he is just weeks before the "sleeping bear" woke up.

    9. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biden is the Democratic senior member of the foreign relations committee. He presided over Bill Clinton's foreign policy, which has been widely seen as more successful than Dubya, who hadn't even been to Europe before he became president (why do we need "experience" in quotes?)

      All of which makes Biden's hallucinations about France, the US, and Hezbollah during the VP debate even more puzzling.

      There are only two possibilities here: 1) He's a moron, saying crazy confabulatory shit that would have been front page news for a week if Sarah Palin had said it, or 2) he blabbed about some secret mission we actually did but no one;s heard about.

      In either case, Hezbollah is still in Lebanon, and the bottom-of-his-class plagiarist from one of the country's worst law schools is manifestly unfit to be President, or Vice President, or the assistant manager of a Burger King.

    10. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by maxume · · Score: 1

      I read your post and loved how your sig riffs on it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up.

    12. Re:He brought the experienced old white guy by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Was it the support for Boris Yeltsin even when he was a drunk?
      So he helped bring Russia from totalitarianism to democracy and he shouldn't be supported because he drinks? Putin's soberly bringing Russia back to authoritarianism.

      Was it picking the wrong side in the Balkans war?
      Fighting against the Milosevich, the Butcher of the Balkans who murdereed tens of thousands in an act of genocide? And giving those involved war trials for crimes against humanity. (He also managed to finish the war, something we're not so good at right now)

      Was it all those failed peace agreements?
      Like the 400 year old conflict in Northern Ireland? 10 years of peace and counting.

      Are you trying to help my point?

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  34. Linking hulu... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...is like saying "this video I saw" to about 95% of humans on planet Earth.

    0% of valuable information.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  35. Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, the vaunted 'undisclosed location' is just the basement of the vice president's normal house?

  36. I'm sure this is the sign by up2ng · · Score: 1

    I'm sure these were the signs to where he was talking about !
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01211/2712signs5_1211111i.jpg or was it this one http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0gCDgR3gVP9B6/610x.jpg. Both are totally safe for work


    What a dumbass

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  37. Bindens apperent inablity to lie is interesting by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    I find his honestly refreshing.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Bindens apperent inablity to lie is interesting by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Bindens apperent inablity to lie is interesting

      You mean, when he's not completely making stuff up, of course, or plagarizing somebody. He's got a long track record on both accounts.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Bindens apperent inablity to lie is interesting by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      This does not reflect an inability to lie, just an inability to keep his mount shut. AFAIK, his ability to lie is still intact.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  38. I just forgot about the Bailout and the Swine Flu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to the media to keep my ape mind entertained and mesmerized!

  39. logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biden tells a handful of people, Newsweek does a blog entry on it, FOX posts a news story on their site about it. Who is the biggest leaker here?

  40. Doest it matter? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I mean who would want to kidnap or kill that guy anyway? He's a worthless decoration. It would be like stealing the picture on the wall when you're inside Fort Knox. ^^
    Besides, when you'd abduct him, he might trip and fall over himself, dying in the process. Who would want to clean up all the dimensions of that mess? ^^

    He'd be perfectly safe, sitting right next to Osama and the forty holy warriors.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  41. Much ado about nothing by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Anyone with the resources and willingness to make an attempt on the VP's life would have known this. Just because YOU didn't know doesn't make this some awful security breach.

    BTW, we also have secure bunkers under the White House. ZOMG!!!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  42. Reflections on those who elect Politicians by BoRegardless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With a "dumb" electorate, you get "leaders" who have little or no training in economics, business, international relations or governance. Thus we get people who often have money or married it and smile enough in good looking cloths with cute one sentence sound bites to amuse people who get their news & "analysis" in one sentence sound bites and the electorate then ELECT those, hmm, 'political actors'. We should not be surprised at the empty heads in WDC. Rather to be expected.

    1. Re:Reflections on those who elect Politicians by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      With a "dumb" electorate, you get "leaders" who have little or no training in economics, business, international relations or governance. Thus we get people who often have money or married it and smile enough in good looking cloths with cute one sentence sound bites to amuse people who get their news & "analysis" in one sentence sound bites and the electorate then ELECT those, hmm, 'political actors'. We should not be surprised at the empty heads in WDC. Rather to be expected.

      Except Biden is pretty much the opposite of that. He knows what he's doing, there's just a loose connection somewhere between his brain and his mouth.

  43. Where is the douche tag? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    This guy is like another Quayle.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  44. Wrong Terminology by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    I don't think we're using the right term to describe Cheney's secret hideout. While "Bunker" does have a nicely Hitlerian ring to it, I think either "Lair" or "Crypt" are more in tune with Cheyney. Perhaps if it needs a name, R'lyeh will do.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  45. Biden is an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biden is an idiot. We have got to keep Obama alive!!!!

    BTW, I voted for the other guys - their many flaws were better IMHO.

  46. This thread is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. worthless without pics.

  47. This bunker is not secret! by dtmos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The location and description of this bunker is in Bob Woodward's latest book, The War Within , published by Simon & Schuster on 8 September 2008.

    1. Re:This bunker is not secret! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was originally written about in The Washington Post, 12/8/2002.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A24386-2002Dec7&notFound=true

    2. Re:This bunker is not secret! by Damek · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points for you. Simple & informational comment. Kudos.

    3. Re:This bunker is not secret! by rhizome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since the first line of the summary is "Fox News reports," we can be sure Hugh Pickens is simply writing a hit-piece on Biden.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:This bunker is not secret! by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      And Bob Woodward is a credible source of official classified information regarding the government's emergency procedures to protect the line of succession?

    5. Re:This bunker is not secret! by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      Wow, load your question much?

      Bob Woodward did not reveal "official classified information regarding the government's emergency procedures to protect the line of succession."

      Your question, therefore, makes no sense.

    6. Re:This bunker is not secret! by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Right. He revealed the results of his investigation, which likely had anonymous and otherwise mildly credible sources. That is qualitatively different than the VP of the US stating it. Does my question "make sense" to you now?

    7. Re:This bunker is not secret! by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      No. You miss the point entirely. The existence and location of the bunker was neither classified nor a secret. Your question presupposes that it was.

  48. that's punny... by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    The Naval Observatory?

    So it's not inaccurate to call the VP a "Naval gazer"?

  49. Ah, so that's why... by stararmy · · Score: 1

    I was staying in the Omni Shoreham hotel, which is like a block away, and I noticed that the Observatory was all pixeled out on Google Maps. It makes sense, though, that's it's a bunker site. I can't say I'm surprised at all. There are bunkers all over DC.

  50. The Price Is Right "Losing Horns" by JJRRutgers · · Score: 1

    Just have a laptop wired with sound cued up to this website:

    http://bombombombomwooooo.com/

    1. Re:The Price Is Right "Losing Horns" by Golden+Avatar · · Score: 1

      About two years ago I installed and configured Nagios to replace a very old version of What's Up Gold for our company's network monitoring needs. I have my blackberry set so anytime I receive an alert from Nagios, TPIR "Losing Horns" is the sound it makes. Everyone in the IT department knows when they hear that sound coming from my phone, something's wrong with a server or service in our environment.

  51. Consider the ad hom fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know they do a basic newscast once in a while?

    I have no use for any of the cable news networks anymore, but this meme of crying "Faux News lies!" when they so much as give a weather forecast is beyond old and tired.

    And the fact that this is being widely reported and appears to be very true just make you look like an even vaster tool.

    1. Re:Consider the ad hom fallacy by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to agree. Biased doesn't mean false. I'd like proof that any one of our news networks AREN'T biased. That just decides what gets through the "interesting" or "relevant" filters, depending on their audience.

  52. Request Permission To Land: +1, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on war crminal fomer President-VICE Richard B. Cheney's spider-hole.

    Peace be with you.

    Yours In Justice,
    Kilgore Trout

  53. Is he REALLY that stupid? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    ..or was this some divisive way of furthering some other objective? Like, maybe getting a better bunker built somewhere else. I.e. Now they have to.

  54. Nickname by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Gaffy Duck"

  55. Re:Semper Infidelis by RingDev · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ate that apple. Some of the best and worst times of my life. Some of the best and worst of society are contained in there.

    Now, what exactly did I give away? That I was assigned to a unit? That we would be stationed at a facility? That's hardly telling anything of merit.

    The facility had been (when I was in) top secret. While I was in the Corps, I was aware of civilian delivers to the facility. Since I have left active duty, I have learned that the facility I would have been working at has been declassified.

    zOMG, string me up like a traitor for leaking vague references to a facility that is no longer top secret and has had it's location plastered on the front page of /.

    I tell ya what, go down to your local recruiter and join up. You appear to hold Marines in quite high regard, so why not be all you can be? I can assure you, surviving even just a 4 year tour will be far more rewarding to your life than any amount of keyboard jockeying.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  56. the US keep a secret... ever? No. by adosch · · Score: 1

    If our country/leaders could keep a secret about anything it would be the greatest miracle EVER. I don't see Jesus being threatened in the 'miracle' category on this one...
    ...yet another target for Al qaeda to pin a 'red' tack onto.

  57. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by AxemRed · · Score: 5, Informative

    If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65% of them would have supported Obama.

    I think you may want to look into look into the percentage of African Americans that vote Democrat regardless of race.

  58. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by 16Chapel · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean John Sidney McCain?

  59. The real danger by mx119 · · Score: 0

    I just hope he doesn't reveal that the bunker under Cheyenne Mountain is still in operation, and why are his eyes glowing?

  60. Not news. by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is so far from being newsworthy, it's almost funny.

        It's pretty much a given that any facility that a world leader will spend a lot of time in, will have a safe room (bunker, if you will). I'd be fairly confident that the Whitehouse has one. The Pentagon is one. :) Camp David has a back entrance to Site-R/Raven Rock Mountain Complex. There's a ring of underground facilities in a 300 mile radius of DC (except for under the water, I assume) that may or may not be connected by a series of tunnels. It's not hard to find information on quite a few of them.

        They aren't new. But, they're likely new to people who are surprised by the possibility of a safe room under the VP's residence.

        And no, it's not a evil government conspiracy. It's good security. With a whole variety of safe locations to put the people you're suppose to protect, an aggressive attempt by a foreign power would be dramatically spread out to take every possible bunker location. Even with inside information, unless it's someone in the immediate proximity of the President, it would be very difficult for an aggressor to find him.

          For example, say I was a secret service agent assigned to the POTUS. I know that there is an aggressive assault on known locations. I also know that someone inside is providing location details to the aggressor. I call in that he is now being transferred by limo to a site Northwest of DC. We send a driver in the limo by himself (with escort following) and then we take a rather plain looking suburban Southwest to another site. Ok, so the President is missing, but he's safe.

        Would the aggressor know until the limo stops? Possibly. So instead of one or two known sites, it's almost anywhere in America. Once they can get on a VC-25, E-4B, C-32, or C-40 it becomes anywhere in the world. As far as that goes, he could end up on any sufficiently supplied aircraft (armor, flight range, etc). If they stay up long enough, it'd be a matter of maybe following refueling planes, unless they stop at random large airports for refueling. It may be a foreign government nervous if Air Force One lands at an arbitrary international airport with two fighters circling. :) It would be virtually impossible for a foreign aggressor to monitor every airport capable of taking large aircraft.

        The large aircraft requirement gets interesting. In looking for the requirements of those planes, it appears 6k feet can get one down and back up safely. In that thread, someone mentions a C-5 landing a MKC (7k foot runway), and another person mentions a 747 landing at QRA. If it's not loaded down with baggage and passengers, and fuel is kept reasonable, they can get up and down on pretty short runways. It may not be quite as comfortable for the passenger, but I'm sure POTUS will understand in an emergency condition. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Not news. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      The installations in the federal ring are only about 50 miles out (300 miles puts them well past the mountains not to mention makes them useless in time of war as it would take too long to get to one) and are far from secret: Cannonball, Cannonball 2, Corkscrew, Mt Weather, Raven Rock, Site R, Camp David, the list goes on. You can Eyeball then, and find lots of info about them in the web.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Not news. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          The references I found said 300 mile radius. You mention a few more that were grouped with them, so I'd guess your distance estimate is better. The idea of many of those installations were to be outside of the blast radius of a nuke hitting DC.

          50 miles would be more practical, but even if they could drive at 120mph, it would take 25 minutes to get to the bunkers. Ya, in an ideal world. Well, I guess a less than ideal world, if the call comes that says "They've launched nukes. They're headed for DC. Take cover", and you find out that you're equidistant to every bunker and with 15 minutes notice, you're still 25 minutes away from any of them. I know in reality, there are plenty of other places to get to, or give HMX-1 a call for immediate pickup.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Not news. by Animats · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much a given that any facility that a world leader will spend a lot of time in, will have a safe room (bunker, if you will). I'd be fairly confident that the Whitehouse has one. The Pentagon is one.

      The White House has a bunker, but it's not deep enough to survive a precision nuclear strike. There was a plan during the Ford administration to build a serious bunker and tunnel system connecting the White House and the Pentagon, about a mile down, but it probably wasn't built. The White House has a tunnel to the Treasury building, and that's well known.

      The USSR, though, really did build secret underground tunnels and subways between the Kremlin and distant bunkers.

    4. Re:Not news. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure there is a tunnel between the White House and the National Naval Medical Center. The Red Line of the DC Metro system neatly connects the two--it runs pretty close to the White House, and has a public exit at the NIH across the street from the Medical Center. Also, it's a military hospital, so it has medical facilities and a military presence for security and protection.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    5. Re:Not news. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Flight time to camp David is about 20 minutes. From CD to Hagerstown Maryland Regional Airport is about 10 (recent runway extentions there can handle a 747).

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    6. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on top of all that is the simple fact that it doesn't matter. All the VP bunker is good for - all it CAN possibly be good for - is something like a small local terrorist bomb. This thing would not survive any more serious attack, because the next most serious attack is nuclear in the megaton range and the VP shelter would automatically be destroyed just because it's so close to the White House, and whether anyone knows the VP bunker exists makes no difference to the outcome.

  61. "sensitive material" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok so the idiot blurbs this to other people in a secure area. Then the news finds out and publicizes it. As if it wasn't a secret. Think news channels need to know when to shut the f' up

  62. Says GOP hack avoiding Bush economic catastrophe by leftie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Keep displaying faux outrage about every minor thing that comes up in relation to Democratic Party in desperate attempt to change subject from the economic catastrophe Bush/Cheney caused.

  63. How wasteful by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I always thought that Cheney shared his "secret location" with Osama bin Laden. I mean, having two of them is kind of wasteful.

  64. It's a Secret Time-Travel Bunker by Quothz · · Score: 1

    I like how Fox claims that this bunker was constructed at the end of 2002 and was used for Cheney to hide in after the WTC attacks. Either Dick was very, very patient, or one of their assumptions is off.

    1. Re:It's a Secret Time-Travel Bunker by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They didn't say how soon after the WTC attacks he hid in there ;)

  65. Only in wildest dreams of GOP hacks by leftie · · Score: 1

    There are no high ranking elected Democratic Party members who go out and display the kind of public stupidity that the "best and the brightest" of the GOP, the top leaders of the Republican Party display on a daily basis.

    1. Re:Only in wildest dreams of GOP hacks by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the Pelosi press conference last week.

    2. Re:Only in wildest dreams of GOP hacks by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      Really? Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and Obama sans teleprompter all say hi.

  66. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    While completely off-topic, I applaud you for having the courage for calling out racists of all colours. There is no such thing as reverse racism. Racism affects every ethnic group out there.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  67. No news by dafradu · · Score: 1

    "In December 2002, neighbors complained of loud construction work being done at the Naval Observatory, which has been used as a residence by vice presidents since 1974." Oh my god, there is a bunker in the VP house?? Is there one under the White House too or is that also top secret?

  68. Seriously... google Gingrich gaffes, McConnell... by leftie · · Score: 1

    gaffes, Merkowsky gaffes, Palin gaffes, Kyl gaffes...

  69. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're ignoring the primary contests (mentioned above) between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, both democrats. Given a choice between two (more or less) identical Democrats, black voters overwhelmingly chose the black candidate. Women voters sometimes preferred the woman candidate, but not consistently and not by the margins seen with race-based voting.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  70. maybe.... by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1

    I may or may not have been involved in some part of the "contingency of government" operation where Cheney was during the days right after 9/11 and I may or may not have been in a bunker with him and I may or may not know where that was. AND they may or may not have gotten the location right.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  71. Biden sets us straight? by supajerm · · Score: 1

    ..and with one swift swoop..."Biden Reveals Location of Secret VP Bunker" assures us of there no longer being a potential assassination attempt on Obama. right?

  72. Re:Semper Infidelis by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is no honor in hiding the truth, you submissive little soldier.

  73. De-rezzed Details surround the Veep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would explain why Google Maps has deliberately obfuscated the US Naval Observatory: http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=38.921448,-77.066914&spn=0.005451,0.011373&t=h&z=17 The current image (if you look closely) does not match the surrounding imagery - that's because it was taken prior to the start of construction. The previous image on the site was pixellated to reduce detail. LiveMaps Bird's Eye view is still at a lower resolution: http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCP&cp=qgm4g18kb2c9&style=b&lvl=1&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&scene=24019178&encType=1

  74. Do we need secret location? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean... in a full-scale nuclear war, does it really matter where the vice president is hiding out?

  75. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given a choice between two (more or less) identical Democrats

    Ah yes. And thus does our progress towards completely losing our ability to distinguish continue apace.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  76. Mea culpa by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

    no, she didn't. Look, I don't pay attention to that crap. She didn't say "I can see Russia from my house." She said that Alaska keeps an eye on Russia when they come across the border and implied that Alaska somehow keeps Russia in line.

    Honestly, one make her look naive and one makes her dumb. I'm not sure which is worse.

  77. Re:Semper Infidelis by Choad+Namath · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are the very definition of the term "tool."

  78. Re:Semper Infidelis by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    And you just broke rule #1 and #2 of the Semper Fi club : never talk about Semper Fi.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  79. Re:Semper Infidelis by pwfffff · · Score: 1

    "To do otherwise is just to puff yourself up, and no real Marine needs to puff himself up."

    Yeah, you sure made your point about how much better you are by pointing out how you don't need to... point it... out...

    I don't know which is funnier, your average internet tough guy or your average 'I USED TO BE IN THE MARINES, I'M SO HARDCORE' tough guy. This guy's BOTH!

  80. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by daVinci1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your signature is oddly appropriate in this case.

    However, I don't think Obama and Hillary were at all "more or less identical". Except to people who weren't interested in voting for either of them in the first place.

    Democrats were fairly polarized over Hillary vs. Obama, and for once it wasn't because the candidates were overwhelmingly the same--it was because they were overwhelmingly different.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  81. Can it self-destruct? by hypnolizard · · Score: 1

    Does it have a self-destruct for when the enemy is at the front door?

    --
    "Old bag" has more than one meaning.
  82. Time travel by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    This will be the ultimate test to see if time travel actually exists! If I wake up tomorrow morning and Vice President Cheney is dead, then we'll all know that traveling to the past and changing history can be done!

    Hmm... wait, would I be typing this then?

  83. The man-sized safe! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    This must be where the man-sized safe is!

    He didn't say what Cheney left in there did he? What or who, whatever.

  84. The secret location is elsewhere by aoheno · · Score: 1

    The fact that he revealed it means the secret location is elsewhere.

    The communications equipment is for YouTube and Netflix.

    --
    Her lips were softer than a duck's bill, but her quacks ...
  85. How about these? by tjstork · · Score: 4, Informative

    Agents that tortured

    Don't hear too many protests about that one. And of course, there's the famous outing of Air America, and its successor in Latin America. You have Dianne Feinstein confirming covert American operations in Pakistan, and so on.

    Pretty much, Democrats don't really care about the secrecy of anything in the CIA, unless it suits them. 99% of the outrage over Valerie Plame's outing is obviously and utterly false.

    --
    This is my sig.
  86. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    Absolutely correct. And let's not forget the huge number of African-Americans who supported Hillary. The nomination controversy (remember Michigan and Florida?) caused this to be of not-insubstantial concern to the Obama campaign.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  87. Re:Says GOP hack avoiding Bush economic catastroph by ArcherB · · Score: 0

    Keep displaying faux outrage about every minor thing that comes up in relation to Democratic Party in desperate attempt to change subject from the economic catastrophe Bush/Cheney caused.

    Um, I might want to point out that the economy was doing quite well until the Democrats took over Congress. So what you call a Bush/Cheney catastrophe was actually a Pelosi/Reid catastrophe. Actually, to be completely fair, we can trace this back to the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That would make it a Dodd/Frank catastrophe.

    Remember, according to the Constitution, Congress controls the purse strings, and therefor the economy, not the President. All the president does is sign the budget into law or veto it, causing a governmental shut down.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  88. Biden's Blunder by Peteyo311 · · Score: 1

    Well At Least he didn't Spell Potato Wrong.

  89. Another leak? by NightFears · · Score: 2, Funny

    > his most trusted aides
    Can't believe this has gone overlooked so far. Dick Cheney has got aides!

  90. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    The other thing to consider, as well, is the question of where that 65% number comes from. Perhaps if there were fewer white people who were racists--as well as people of other backgrounds--maybe the margin of victory would have been even greater, perhaps even similar to what it was among AfAm voters.

    I think (note: opinion alert!) it's probably fair to assume that the percentage of non-AfAm voters who voted for McCain SOLELY because of his racial background is roughly equal to the percentage of AfAm voters who voted for Obama SOLELY because of his.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  91. Re:Semper Infidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or start a pizza delivery operation

  92. Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't necessarily matter if there were hints of the location in other publications. What matters is that Biden spilled it to the sharks (media), and now it's getting much more attention than it normally would have.

  93. My faviorite "Bidenism" by krygny · · Score: 1

    (sort of like "Yogi-isms only not clever or funny, just stupid bullshit)

    Right after the stock market crash of 1929, FDR went on television to address the American people. Of course I always wondered what the Secretary of the Navy would talk about on TV, especially since the only person who might have been able to watch it was Philo T. Farnsworth.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    1. Re:My faviorite "Bidenism" by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      That's hilarious. If Biden said that he's a freaking comedic geek genius. And that's despite screwing up what job FDR had in 1929 (governor of New York).

  94. "Potentially Classified" by eples · · Score: 1
    FTFA:

    [..] divulging potentially classified information meant to save the life of a sitting vice president.

    What exactly does "potentially classified" mean? Something is either classified or it is not. News organizations are supposed to report facts, this is just speculation.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:"Potentially Classified" by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

      Heh, excellent point. A state may have secrets, but if it has secret laws, it is at least partially a police state.

  95. This will all be fixed with a giant Wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People I know in the executive are under orders from not to say anything to the press about anything without clearing it with the white house. Even if it's already online.

    I think they are setting up a giant wiki to post all information anyone needs to know, because, you know, if it's on the internet it must be true. I Have two theories:

    1) BOFH theory: White House can just tell reporters to RTFM.

    2) Password theory: They are still having trouble with their "logins".

  96. And yet by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He steadfastly supports draconian copyright measures and the like. Now maybe he's just doing it because he's a dumbass, I suppose there's that. However I think it is more likely that the man owes big media in some way, and thus tows their party line.

    That is why people accuse him of being owned by Hollywood. It isn't because of anything secret or shady, it is because of voting record. He routinely pushes for laws with regards to copyright that many would call unconstitutional, and nearly all would call unfair to the consumer.

    So you tell me, what's your theory as to why he votes this way?

    1. Re:And yet by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      I can easily see it happening when you have someone who's just not as in touch with modern technology or as big a consumer of copyrighted material as most of us. America is a huge producer of intellectual property and you can paint it as protecting our interests.

      We have a different perspective and there may well be some payola involved at the end of the day but someone might agree to it without being a lapdog.

    2. Re:And yet by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I'm going with Sage's theory. IP is not Biden's forte and never has been. He's more concerned foreign relations and international law.

      Find anyone in congress over 60 who has both used the internet and understands its implications as a technology.

      Biden simply legislates IP law like it's 1980.

      If you can find any evidence that anyone in Hollywood actually contributed to his political campaign, then there's some evidence of corruption. The only thing I could find was that Michael J. Fox and Aaron Sorrin each gave him $1,000 in 2002, which out of a few million, is a drop in the bucket.

      The good news is that one can educate and influence the ignorant, but not the corrupt.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  97. Re:Semper Infidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were unlucky to know you in person and see you in a bar, I'd pour my drink out and walk out.

    Oh, that'd be a loss.

  98. Re:Semper Infidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I appreciate both your service and your honesty. My grandad, who I'm named after, served in two world wars and my Uncle hit the beach at Iwo Jima.

    We need more Marines that are human beings, and fewer "soldiers" who are effectively mere robots that can be programmed to obey any order, no matter how foul. I'm sure you met both kinds during your service.

    When you read Ernie Pyle and Bill Maudlin's stories of WWII, you realise that what distinguished the American fighting man from others was not his courage or his willpower - plenty of other nations (not least the Germans and British) had all that - but his willingness to subvert military expediency to serve basic morality. That's how we won the peace after the war... because people remembered that Americans were less likely use the cover of war to commit crimes, and more likely to show some basic decency to the local folks being crushed by the war.

  99. A New Age by Kaldesh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is one of the first steps in this new transparent gov't we where told to expect? Next maybe Biden will accidentally bring us alien autopsy footage while commenting on the terrible interior design of Area 51.

  100. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Tycho · · Score: 1

    You miss something, African-Americans are not distributed in the American socio-economic hierarchy the same way as other racial groups and thus their voting should not be expected to be similar to that of whites. Besides, when all the Republican Party has to offer African-Americans is Alan Keyes, failed trickle-down economic policies, beliefs like the government is always worse than private industry, and unfavorable social policies, the Republican party will lose again and again. Until Republicans are willing to modernize their views to bring them more in line with voters in order to capture more elected offices, they will continue to lose. Then, to prevent their election gains from lasting any more than an election cycle, these new views an policy goals cannot be marginalized by the old policy goals. Also any new policy goals will probably not be much like hard core libertarian views, if Ron Paul's performance and polls are any judge. Instead, Republicans will probably need to be pragmatic and open to compromise with Democrats. I wait to see this happen though, the continued extreme tilt further to the right of the Republican Party is still ongoing with its continuing intra-party bloodbath.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  101. Re:Semper Infidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how things have changed.

  102. It is believed that this is a BS story by aaandre · · Score: 1

    "Fox News reports that the Naval Observatory bunker is believed to be the secure, undisclosed location former Vice President Dick Cheney remained under protection in secret after the 9/11 attacks."

    Believed by whom? By the person who wrote the announcement? By the janitor? By the janitor's 5 year old son?

    Fox' Orewllian language has removed factuality from "news" a looong time ago.

  103. Maybe the Dick Cheney Could Help Us? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    From what I have read, on one has "actually" tested the "V.P. Fuhrer Bunker" out? Maybe Dick Cheney could test the bunker out for lets say, 20 years? Then there would be "No Doubt". Oh, and remember to put some food, and water in the bunker also; 20 years is a lot of radio broadcasting time...

  104. Re:Semper Infidelis by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You appear to hold Marines in quite high regard, so why not be all you can be?

    Heh.. that's the Army. Don't think any Marine would ever make that mistake. Although you could say "Accelerate your life," since Marines are just the hiking division of the Navy. :P

  105. Why? by m509272 · · Score: 1

    Why is it when a Democrat does something wrong the subject is immediately shifted to the prior administration? I simply don't get this.

    Assuming Biden confirmed this he a) endangers those that would occupy that bunker b) now likely causes the construction of a new location.

    Just imagine what it cost the country when that a**hole reporter exposed the Greenbriar location. How was this a good thing and how does it help by invoking the behavior of others? Two wrongs don't make a right. You people just don't get it. You're no better than those you complain about.

    1. Re:Why? by argent · · Score: 1

      Why is it when a Democrat does something wrong the subject is immediately shifted to the prior administration? I simply don't get this.

      That would be Fox News' fault:

      The vice president, well-known for his verbal gaffes, confirms at a dinner the existence and location of a secret hidden bunker that Cheney is believed to have used after the 9/11 attacks. -- http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/17/oops-biden-reveals-location-secret-vp-bunker/

  106. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This provides a nice apples-to-apples comparison of democratic votes from 2004 to 2008. It's a nice source to quote when people bring up the "Blacks who voted for Obama were racist" meme.

  107. Re:Says GOP hack avoiding Bush economic catastroph by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    It's been building for a hell of a lot longer than when Bush (jr or sr) was in office. But by all means keep spreading FUD so that you can believe that your precious party is squeaky clean.

  108. Re:Semper Infidelis by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Get a grip. He didn't disclose anything other than "he was stationed somewhere that used to be a classified location." There are, literally, volumes of memoirs by ex-Marines (using your definition) divulging far more sensitive information, and many more works that are spun into "historical fiction." If nobody said anything, there would be a void in our culture, and our populace would be uninformed. That, in my opinion, is the very opposite of loyalty.

  109. Re:Semper Infidelis by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    My grandad, who I'm named after Must be tough being in the miiltary with a last name of Coward...

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  110. Re:Semper Infidelis by RingDev · · Score: 3, Funny

    My subtle attempt at military humor was not lost ;)

    As for being a department of the Navy, that is correct.

    We are the Mens department.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  111. Moron should be the new political party. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's face it. America since JFK (his hijinks notwitshstanding) has elected one moronic government after another. With each new administration we slowly slip into the abyss of stupidity, communism and ultimately oblivion.

  112. That's why it's blurry in Google Earth by kriston · · Score: 1

    Biden's comments offer an explanation to the obscurity masks placed on the Observatory in applications like Google Earth. Why the USNO but not the White House? Cheney's secret bunker is why.

    --

    Kriston

  113. Re:Semper Infidelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are the Mens department.

    You sure as hell aren't the Mensa department. ;-)

  114. Did Biden mention if by beamin · · Score: 1

    Cheney's love lair with Jeff Gannon was also discovered?

  115. Re:Semper Infidelis by ultranova · · Score: 1

    "Always faithful" includes not spilling even when its been spilled.

    "Always faithful" means not betraying a secret yourself, and has nothing to do with discussing common knowledge.

    Even though your wife is unfaithful, you stay faithful.

    Maybe. You might also get a divorce, or simply decide to make it an "open marriage".

    Even if the "facility" were declassified, you don't freely discuss it.

    Declassifying something means that your higher-ups have told you its okay to freely discuss it. Discussing it is, therefore, okay.

    There are things you don't even tell family years after.

    The day I put loyalty to any country above my family is the day I stop deserving one.

    Even when its declassified the honorable ones take it to the grave.

    Honour or the lack of it has nothing to do with the decision to discuss or not discuss a declassified thing.

    The only they he has to say, whether 17 or 97 is "I am a Marine" and that is enough to earn respect. You've lost the respect.

    I'm sure he'll lose a lot of sleep over that.

    If indeed you are telling the truth, then you are scum. If not, you are still scum. There are no ex-Marines, but I think you qualify, if you ever were one.

    Scum for discussing something he's specifically been allowed to discuss? LOL WUT?

    If I were unlucky to know you in person and see you in a bar, I'd pour my drink out and walk out.

    I'm sure the bar patrons wouldn't beg you to stay, either.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  116. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Cornflake917 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if I'm the only who instantly disregards what someone is saying when they use Obama's middle name every time he is referenced.

  117. Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have read most of the 380 comments in this story I have to say I have not seen so many moronic, illiterate, Bush hating dumb asses in one spot in a long time. Is Jr. High out for the summer already?

    If we took all the tin foil covering your 7th grade level brains we could remake the frickin Eiffel Tower.

    If I had a penny for every dipshit comment trying to bash anyone but Biden, I would own Slashdot and the servers it runs on.

    Then there is the truly challenged who believe anything written on Wikipedia. Read the cites and make up your own damned mind. Don't rely on some unemployed fanatic writing articles from home in his underwear to explain them for you.

  118. "Politically correct" is just fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really need a right wing equivalent for "politically correct"

    "Politically correct" is just fine for that. Conservatives are, if anything, more easily offended than liberals. Look at all the loud whining that goes on when, for example, someone says "Season's greetings" or "Happy holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas," wears the wrong color of scarf (as Rachel Ray did), doesn't wear a flag lapel, and so on, and so on.

  119. Re:Yeah, real big secret Does this make him the by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    #1 or the #TWO "Bunker Buster" (bunkers AND bunk, and debunker (of myths?)...) bu bu bu bu BOOM!, heheheh

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  120. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Hottie+Parms · · Score: 1

    You're not alone. I mean, if they had used McCain's middle name, it *might* have sounded a bit less biased, but seriously -- it's like you're emphasizing the fact that his middle name is Hussein (which is not a bad thing -- it just instills fear in the uninformed).

  121. Re:Semper Infidelis by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    I tell ya what, go down to your local recruiter and join up. You appear to hold Marines in quite high regard, so why not be all you can be? I can assure you, surviving even just a 4 year tour will be far more rewarding to your life than any amount of keyboard jockeying.

    Sparky, I did my tours. Probably before you were in High School. And, I'm still serving, working for a DOD component as a government employee, along side Marines, Soldiers, Airmen, and Sailors.

    And, you should know, confirmation of information is very valuable in the intel field.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  122. bullshit by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    These are private security contractors. Mercenaries. They were paid a fee; they were not protected as an undercover agent is and they certainly did not have Non-Official Cover status. And there's no evidence that a "Democrat" blew their covers. In fact, it sounds like the CIA leaked their names themselves.

  123. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65% of them would have supported Obama.

    I think you may want to look into look into the percentage of African Americans that vote Democrat regardless of race.

    For example, according to CNN's exit polls in the 2004 presidential election, 88% of African-Americans voted for the Democratic candidate, John Kerry. There were no non-whites on either ticket, so any putative racial preference would have been inoperative.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  124. Construction has been going on for ages by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    I used to live in that area and recall there was a lot of construction off the 'assumed' Calvert street entrance next to the A. Glover Rec Center's parking lot. There was a lot of dump trucks that went through a temp guard gate there for at least 18 months (!) after 9/11. You would only notice it if you lived there or use that path for the ticket-infamous Mass Ave. short cut to G'town. Otherwise, there was so much other construction on Mass Ave. that made the dump trucks look common--considering there was a lot of construction in front of a Muslim mosque/offices right down the road. I can also see the residents complaining, those 4 blocks behind the station are incredibly wealthy, very nice homes in the multi-million range. The construction did involve pile drivers, so it was noisy.

    .

    Nothing new here, it is the highest point in the city (a big hill) and would make some sense to have some tunnels or rooms underground--I thought they were building an underground tunnel to The Good Guys bar (xxx) or JP's (which would make sense too) since it was behind the park. Then again, a basic shelter makes sense...

    we need something for the atomic clock at least.

  125. CSM Coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the Christian Science Monitor's coverage. Headline from their website:

    Biden speaks at Wake Forest - does not disclose nuclear launch codes

  126. The only thing shocking about this article... by d474 · · Score: 1

    ...is that everyone believes the "secret". Has it ever occurred to anyone that it could be a Psy-Op designed to make everyone think that's where the bunker still is? It could also be designed to "shape" the perception of Biden's behavioral patterns so that when in the future he may let "slip" other "secret" information, the enemies actually believe it.

    My point is that with these kinds of stories, what you see (or what they want you to see) isn't always the truth. Take it with a grain of salt, all the other hype is just political grand standing.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  127. The bunker has my tongue. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Huge, impregnable bunker under VP's residence. This and other shocking news at 11!

    I wonder if there's a bunker under the White House, too?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  128. Joe Biden's first FML by Kildjean · · Score: 1
    I think it went something like this:

    Joe Biden:"Today, I am disclosing a secret location to the american public, 'The secret hideout for the Vice-President's Bunk' underneath the old US Naval Observatory and its--"
    Aide:Um Sir that is your bunk...
    Joe Biden:"FML"

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
  129. Ask the Irish about Bill Clinton by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

    Slick Willy apparently made a huge impression on the Northern Ireland/IRA battles. From what I heard he'd be a nearly a saint over there if he was catholic. Clinton: 1 Dubya: -6 I'm not a fan of Clinton, but Dubya and Cheney just fucked this country up.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    1. Re:Ask the Irish about Bill Clinton by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of Clinton, but Dubya and Cheney just fucked this country up.

      Actually, truth be told, what has really fucked this country up the most is the one policy both political parties actually agreed upon - free trade, and using trade concessions to get military bases. The chickens of decades long process of replacing a diverse manufacturing base with banking jobs came home to roost for Bush, but already by the end of Johnson's term trade and budget deficits forced the USA off of the gold standard, somewhere during Reagan the USA became a debtor nation, trade deficits exploded under Clinton, and Bush pretty much tried to keep the ball rolling but unlike other terms, the fundamentals were very broken. The great irony is that of all the past Presidents, only Reagan would ever actually act to curb imports when he put the Japanese on an import quota for cars. Bush's response to Detroits malady was of course idiotic, but Obama's been worse - instead of nationalizing the companies, he should have just quota'd all the imports for a decade. Once you guarantee market share, capitalization would have immediately followed.

      --
      This is my sig.
  130. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they vote Democrat. There's only one party that wants them to stay on welfare.

  131. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by bluemonq · · Score: 1

    "So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate."

    Are you kidding me? Speaking as a Chinese-American, I have a couple family members whose votes were influenced (both positively and negatively) by the fact that he was black. What, you think other minorities aren't racist as well?

  132. BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think everyone assumes it's just swiss cheese underneath DC with the tunnels and complexes and whatnot. And you just know they're messing around with viruses down there.

  133. Don't worry until . . . by siloko · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering when he'll give away something that actually matters.

    You don't need to worry until they start putting Road Signs pointing out your state secrets.

  134. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

    What, you think other minorities aren't racist as well?

    Don't be stupid, of course minorities can't be racist!

    Everybody knows the safest place for a white kid to grow up is in predominantly black neighborhoods in Detroit.

    This is because only white people can be racist. Duh. Don't you watch TV?

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  135. Guys guys by brkello · · Score: 1

    Let's not get worked up over this. It isn't like any real media sources are covering it.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  136. Slashdot jumped the shark today by Swampash · · Score: 1

    This article, really, it's embarrassing. I feel guilty for visiting now.

  137. Google Maps' preferential treatment by dgcaste · · Score: 1

    The Naval Observatory has a different resolution than the surrounding structures in Google Maps.

  138. Experienced old white guy VS Palin by elkto · · Score: 1

    "Gave plenty of people pause when they realized how crazy she was."
    BoHahhahhhaaaaaaaa.....
    You're killing me :-) I would take Palin over Obama any day, Biden is a wack job, and Pelosi......
    BoHahhahHHahhhaaaaaaaa.....
    But, tell you what, you just keep doing what you are doing. The Neo Lib's already have a bad case of buyer remorse with this administration. You can keep driving that home for them without knowing it all day long.
    Heehhee...Ughmmmmm....

  139. WTF is "potentially classified"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some new category? "That may be classified, but I'm not allowed to tell you"?

    So the only way to find out is to publish it, then wait to see if you get arrested...

  140. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "I think you may want to look into look into the percentage of African Americans that vote Democrat regardless of race."

    The percentage of African-Americans who vote Democrat regardless of race has more than a little to do with the percentage of Republicans who regard them as Niggers. The NeoCon Evangeliban aren't exactly beacons of hope in respect to civil rights issues, and should not be surprised that voters they chase away are chased away.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  141. Please, no more US political stories on /. by Esteban · · Score: 1

    This has been the most useless set of comments I've seen on Slashdot (and yes, I'm not excepting my own).

    For some reason, censorship stories, Patriot Act stories, MS stories, OLPC stories, evil-video-game stories, Star Trek stories, dog vs. cat stories, Mountain Dew vs. Jolt stories, coffee/tea stories, religion stories, lawyer stories, public wifi stories, stories that refer to crackers as 'hackers', and a bunch of other story types, none of them prompts a set of comments as worthless as this sort of story.

    We have lots of places to see people post their political views without reading anyone else's comments. Please don't make Slashdot another venue for that.

  142. Re:Says GOP hack avoiding Bush economic catastroph by maxume · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, we'd all be swimming in caviar if we just had one less political party.

    The responsibility for the failure spans parties, administrations and politics (that is, there were big contributors that were not particularly political in nature). I would say that it is most traceable to the complete failure to regulate exotic derivatives products while allowing the companies dealing in them to operate under the veil of government supervision. Then, in that environment, the customers of those companies failed to operate in a pragmatic manner (they trusted that the government was in some way protecting them, which has proven to be incredibly foolish).

    It first showed up in the housing market because much of the activity there was the most completely idiotic; there are half a dozen factors that contributed to that activity, and again, they span parties, administrations and politics..

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  143. douche bag rehab by epine · · Score: 1

    It does make me wonder, however, of the bad stuff that gets falsely pinned to Dick, if the guy is really that bad at all.

    With this logic, you could rehab almost anyone. There exists x who makes false claim y, therefore Cheney is chummy. The only qualification on x is ability to shoot mouth off. x could be the first person booted off American Idol and do no damage to your lemma as stated.

    In fact, I read an article last night which said much the same about Ferdinand Marcos. After finishing Cryptonomicon, I was checking up Yamashita's gold. Everything else in the book with a historical basis I was familiar with already.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamashita's_gold

    Apparently some people fervently believe that Marcos didn't extra billions in wealth from the Philippines, but instead helped himself to gold extracted by the Japanese with ruthless efficiency pretty much anywhere they went during the war and the years leading up to the war.

    Today I watched this video, via Edge. This is Taleb speaking at the Perimeter Institute on the leading edge of the aftermath of the downside of belief in fragile statistics.

    http://streamer.perimeterinstitute.ca/Flash/a28b2897-507f-40e2-8b71-e5d26992a01a/viewer.html

    To cover inference from stupidity, as a higher grade of fragile statistic, we'd have to exhume Cantor to construct some whole new cardinalities.

    Bad statistical instinct:

    Stupid person x said y about z, therefore z isn't so bad after all.

    Good statistical instinct:

    Stupid person x said y about z, therefore what the hell am I doing loitering around here with spam shields inoperative?

    http://www.preferrednetwork.com/GOLD_WARRIORS.htm

    When we ran Freedom of Information queries to see what was behind it, we were grudgingly sent a copy of a telex message on which every word was blacked out, including the date. The justification given for this censorship was the need to protect government sources, which are above the law.

    This source has so many shades of dubious it makes my eyes bug out, but one nevertheless wonders what Cheney actually deserves. Not judging so much by this, but other things, Cheney didn't find himself in a swirling cloud of false accusations by accident. Some transparency here and there from the Bush administration would have greatly reduced this effect.

  144. Re:Semper Infidelis by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Correct, so go pick your bone with Wikipedia, Wired, Boston Globe, Global Security, FAS, or any of the hundreds of other sites, organizations, and government departments that have long since been confirming the existance of such a facility.

    Accusing me of confirming such a facility's existance would be akin to faulting someone for admiting to knowing of a certain formerly top secret military installation in southern Nevada not far from Las Vegas.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  145. In case you're curious, the passage by dtmos · · Score: 1

    "During Cheney's years in the Bush administration, the official vice presidential residence at the Naval Observatory in northwest Washington had been transformed into a kind of fortress with a hardened bunker in case of another terrorist attack. Armed security guards, multiple barriers, explosive-sniffing dogs, and two fences protected the house, a stately but weathered 19th-century Queen Anne mansion on a hill."

    --Bob Woodward, The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008, p. 417.

  146. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Slave doesn't tread to far from the Master eh? Some things never change.

  147. Re:Real Tragedy: Black Racism Against non-Blacks by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure where this FUD came about regarding Republicans as the racists, but it's BS.

    The Klan resisted Reconstruction by assaulting, murdering and intimidating freedmen and white Republicans, members of the abolitionist movement. Wikipedia

    In fact, it was the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) who aligned themselves with the Democrat Party. Look it up. Also, the KKK specifically recruted anti-jewish and anti-catholic members later in the years as their power waned. Simply put, they were a hate group. A precursor to the Skinheads of today.

    Oh, and we still have a former member of the KKK in office. His name is Robert Carlyle Byrd. Care to guess what his party affiliation is? Hint: is starts with a big fat D.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  148. The Obama Administration by terryfunk · · Score: 0

    is proving to be just as incompetent and bumbling as the bush admin they so like to make fun of.

    I mean come on...Obama gets lost when his teleprompter goes whacky and biden can't tell the difference between classified and unclassified information.

    In addition to all this, obama is getting a lesson in running a country as opposed to being a 'community organizer' for christ's sake.

    For example: reneging on closing GitMo? Increasing our involvement in Afghanistan? How many campaign promises does he have to break before people wake up and understand that he's just another power hungry political hack?

    Transparency in government? Really? I have not seen any proof of that yet. How much transparency was there with the bills and executive orders he signed? Were they posted online for 48 hours before he acted on any of them?

    We have all been suckers, including me. I voted for the jerk. I guarantee I won't vote for him again and it's only been a few months in office. I can't imagine the mess we'll be in 4 years from now.

  149. Slow down... by Descalzo · · Score: 1

    You have overused commas her.

    1. This is ambiguous. Is 'overused' intended as a past participle (You've overused the commas.) or as an adjective (You have commas and they're overused.)? Plus there's the feminine possessive at the end. No doubt that error was merely a typo: an imperfection due to your haste to point out imperfections.

    2. You may want to look into the usage of double quotes vs. single quotes when quoting text or singling out key terms.

    3. Also note that this is somewhat subjective and dependent on where you live in the English-speaking world.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  150. "Liar!" by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "You are a liar. Bush's "re-election" (his first actual election) was won primarily because they snuck so many anti-equality laws on the ballots. The bigoted wingnuts came out of the woodwork and voted for Bush while they were there."

    That wasn't hard, considering around 70 percent of Americans agree with him on that issue.One of the most liberal states in the country just eliminated the right for homosexuals to marry. Barrack Obama doesn't support homosexuals marrying either. Do you give him a pass for that? Or is he a wingnut too?

    "Yes, I am absolutely certain that Obama, in 100 days, managed to triple the deficit, compared to 8 years of Bush spending like a drunken frat boy.

    I totally believe that, because, apparently, I am an idiot."

    100 days is the least of it. He's certainly poised to smash all spending records: From 2010 to 2019, Obama projects annual deficits totaling $7.1 trillion; that's atop the $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009.

    I don't think you're an idiot as much as you're politically fanatical as any of the people you attack, just less honest about it. I think you're actually starting to believe that "reality has a liberal bias" line you love so much.

    "Because I have a soul, and the idea of shoving flashlights up little kid's asses [salon.com] in front of the kid's mother is abhorrent to me."

    Good for you (though the soul thing is going to cost you some Karma on Slashdot). You seem to be making the mistake of thinking your ideological foes somehow support that, though. And while doing that to an innocent child is shocking, its still a straw man in the context that you used it: enemy combatants do not have the same Geneva Convention protections that a uniformed army does, and for good reasons.

    "Liar"

    Why don't you just call them "Hitler!" while you're at it? If you keep throwing "liar" around so often, it's going to lose its punch.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  151. And not such a conspiracy by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2559617.stm

    Seems the BBC revealed the "secret" location long before Biden. Yet another Fox news lets make a story out of nothing event.

    You indicate that this is some kind of conspiracy from Fox News, and yet all of the traditional networks, CBS, NBC, and ABC, as well as major papers like the Washington Post and Boston Globe are reporting the same thing.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  152. Re:Semper Infidelis by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    No doubt.. USMC: where the Men are Men, and the Women are too.

  153. Joe Biden thinks Joe Biden sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He couldn't have said it better. "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me." --Joe Biden, speaking at a town hall meeting in Nashua, New Hampshire

  154. Mod parent up by Sinterklaas · · Score: 1

    Indeed. There is a huge difference between a CIA agent that meets with sources in dangerous locations and torturers who hurt unarmed men in a heavily guarded prison. The first group are to be applauded, the second group should be put in prison.

  155. Obama followers are always a source of amusment by elkto · · Score: 1

    Wow, people like you actually exist.

    Lets look at this administrations accomplishments so far:
    Doubled the debt, with plans to quadruple it.
    Loss of MILLIONS of jobs.
    Destroyed the economy (Well that took Obama/Franks/Pelosi and friends years)
    Destroy the countries manufacturing industry.


    But wait, there's more! Saddle the remaining industry with NEEDLESS emission caps (Mans contribution is only .23% TOTAL). Give money we don't have to the needy by borrowing from our enemy's. Apologize to world for being attacked. Adopt inferior health care system (Needed to kill off elderly who is owed Social Security money) Humiliate Catholics by arriving on campus and covering art and phrases expressing Gods love.

    I would have never thought of borrowing more money after baiting the population into borrowing themselves into an inescapable trap, BRILLIANCE!
    Such an accomplished administration!

  156. Biden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biden is a narcissistic idiot... and now obviously a security risk as well. I have to wonder how the NSA/DIA/CIA handle loud mouths like this that they are required to brief?!

  157. Loose lips Sink Ships by lsatenstein · · Score: 0

    Do not allow Biden to have sensitive information.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  158. So... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    So , if I show up with beer and BBQ, do you suppose Biden will let me in? I mean now that he shouted his address into a megaphone, doesn't that mean he craves socialization with the common man?
    I'll bring enough for the SS guarding him as well, but he has to rent the movie, c'mon I can't do it all!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  159. Armitage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, Richard Armitage should not have leaked her identity.

  160. Really... by anyGould · · Score: 1

    ... did anyone think for a moment there wasn't some sort of secure "safehouse" there?

    It's the #2 man's house - there's going to be some sort of defensible position, and it's going to be wired for everything the White House is.

  161. ROFLMAO at teleprompter nonsense by leftie · · Score: 1

    That's all you have left for ammo ? Lame "they use teleprompters" attacks? BWA-HA-HA-ha...

  162. Didn't you know that the dog .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... is an stinking Socialist Liberal that wants to take all our guns?

    Which kind of media are you reading?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  163. That is all great and good. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But who is going to do the necessary work of governing?

    People outside politics it seems that they think that all politicians are a bunch of liars, when the fact is they are just people like us.

    Simply put the people are demanding that politicians are not like them, which is frankly ridiculous.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  164. Was not lying about killing thousands of people. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    That is good enough for me.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  165. Classified? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Like in the neighbours complaining about noise and being told there was classified work going on there?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.