Corrected headline - Android is helping to spread pervasive tracking.
User name and password is "something you know", and as such is not something that can be used without your explicit consent. Seamless login is "something you have", and since it is part of your phone, it doesn't require your explicit consent to be checked.
Make no mistake, this is about removing what little anonymity is left from the Internet. FIDO standard is effectively a Real Name Only policy disguised as progress.
I can't speak for how other do it, but when I trained for matches, I would always do it with a keyboard and mouse I was going to use. I would figure out my setup, layout, shortcuts, sensitivity, what kind of pad and weights I am going to use and then do training drills with that.
Basic skills and know-how of game mechanics are transferable, but muscle memory is very dependent on your setup. If you are going to practice, then it makes sense to practice with a setup you are going to use.
You can't tell exactly because you are unwashed console peasant that is used to swimming in rubber boots (console controller). Even shittiest mouse is light years ahead of controller's joystick, no wonder you are having orgasmic experiences simply touching discarded hand-me-downs from Glorious PC Gaming Master Race.
I used to play FPS (Counter-Strike) and RTS (Star Craft) competitively and in such situations mouse quality matter a great deal. RTS in sniping situations your mouse makes a lot of difference in your time-on-target. For example, if you try AWP whoring with a $10 mouse, you are likely to end up getting out-sniped by players with AK. There are also some circumstances in RTS where mouse matters - high CPS unit micro just isn't possible without gaming mouse as you end up clicking faster than $10 mouse button could reliably register.
However, for generic gaming, like playing anything single-player or grinding MMOG gaming mouse doesn't make that much difference.
Offense culture inevitably leads to blasphemy culture and these are early signs of this phenomenon. If West ends up living in Theocracy, we can all thank SJWs for that.
Question: How are you going to sell a combination of microtransactions (i.e. points) and social media, two least consumer-friendly trends in tech, to users? Do you think we are that stupid?
This is another sign of system racism where no matter how good the machine argues, the audience would just side with an inferior meatbag flapping their flesh.
Correlation does not mean causation. It could be the case that more intelligent kids, that also have higher capacity for moral reasoning, are attracted to video games.
it's that speech can promote violence. Until you understand the argument, the best you'll ever be able to do is logical fallacies.
"Can promote" is not a an argument, it is a hypothetical without any kind of attribution of responsibility.
No, it's a conditional which denotes the fact that not all speech promotes violence. This is a lot simpler than you want it to be. Reality doesn't work the way I want it to either, but I don't pretend otherwise.
No, it isn't a conditional, as it can't be evaluated objectively. How could you possibly create objective standard around "can promote others to act in violence"? This is how you end up with blasphemy laws.
Any common sense reading of net zero greenhouse gasses includes manufacturing though, why would you assume it doesn't?
If you look at lifetime emissions (manufacturing, shipping from China) of solar panels, then subtract lifetime energy produced you end up with a negative number for anywhere but Arizona and similar places. So how are you suppose to get to 100% renewable and net-zero? At best you could probably do single-digit % solar and have net zero after major breakthroughs in recycling, manufacturing, mining, refining, transportation if you run carbon capture from some of that produced energy.
That hypothetical eventual is in a very distant future, because for now there not even a recycling program for these panels. Plus, manufacturing is far, far from being sustainable and environmentally friendly. For foreseeable future solar panels is just outsourcing pollution to China. Not a bad idea, but it is far from net zero.
I am glad we agree that speech is not violence, and treating it as such is wrong.
it's that speech can promote violence. Until you understand the argument, the best you'll ever be able to do is logical fallacies.
"Can promote" is not a an argument, it is a hypothetical without any kind of attribution of responsibility. The fallacy you are trying to sneak into this argument is that if speech can be shown to promote an action, no matter how reasonable such action in response to speech is, then speaker should be held responsible for such action. An example of this principle would be, you ask me to get a coffee, I go rob a coffee shop and now you are an accomplice to robbery.
People enacting violence should be held responsible for said violence. Stop using safety from hypothetical violence by unreasonable people to try to censor ideas you find objectionable, you jack booted regressive e-thug.
It is telling that you would rather herp a derp about Trump than speak about original point - speech is not violence. Trump is as bad as it gets, but going full SJW to get rid of him is not a worthwhile trade-off. For now checks and balances are mostly containing him, and one of those checks is freedom of speech that you working hard on undermining.
Also, I find your post deeply offensive, hence it must be you enacting violence on me.
Slashdot Mirror
Corrected headline - Android is helping to spread pervasive tracking.
User name and password is "something you know", and as such is not something that can be used without your explicit consent. Seamless login is "something you have", and since it is part of your phone, it doesn't require your explicit consent to be checked.
Make no mistake, this is about removing what little anonymity is left from the Internet. FIDO standard is effectively a Real Name Only policy disguised as progress.
My left shoe won't even reboot...
At least database merge succeeded on the right shoe. A not so small miracle.
Hooray! Finally screen large enough to be useful but not large enough that it couldn't be folded and easily carried around.
I can't speak for how other do it, but when I trained for matches, I would always do it with a keyboard and mouse I was going to use. I would figure out my setup, layout, shortcuts, sensitivity, what kind of pad and weights I am going to use and then do training drills with that.
Basic skills and know-how of game mechanics are transferable, but muscle memory is very dependent on your setup. If you are going to practice, then it makes sense to practice with a setup you are going to use.
You can't tell exactly because you are unwashed console peasant that is used to swimming in rubber boots (console controller). Even shittiest mouse is light years ahead of controller's joystick, no wonder you are having orgasmic experiences simply touching discarded hand-me-downs from Glorious PC Gaming Master Race.
I used to play FPS (Counter-Strike) and RTS (Star Craft) competitively and in such situations mouse quality matter a great deal. RTS in sniping situations your mouse makes a lot of difference in your time-on-target. For example, if you try AWP whoring with a $10 mouse, you are likely to end up getting out-sniped by players with AK. There are also some circumstances in RTS where mouse matters - high CPS unit micro just isn't possible without gaming mouse as you end up clicking faster than $10 mouse button could reliably register.
However, for generic gaming, like playing anything single-player or grinding MMOG gaming mouse doesn't make that much difference.
The invention of the GUI and mouse to the extreme liability of putting a driverless car on the streets.
Speak for yourself, I tangled in the cord and nearly choked on an internal trackball.
Offense culture inevitably leads to blasphemy culture and these are early signs of this phenomenon. If West ends up living in Theocracy, we can all thank SJWs for that.
Epic Game Store and Origin hopefully next
You are all like Hitler for talking about legacy of a great actor but only talking about him playing Hitler.
Do Comedians Help Morale On Long Space Missions? Yes. When you space them.
Google, here is your winnings.
Question: How are you going to sell a combination of microtransactions (i.e. points) and social media, two least consumer-friendly trends in tech, to users? Do you think we are that stupid?
Why even bring Jack Dorsey up? It is very clear that he is not in control and just a figurehead at this point.
Activate protocol 2! This is not a drill, activate protocol 2! The human consciousness simulation escaped the containment.
Parasites doing parasitism on more parasites. Don't delude yourself into thinking that social media tech companies are producers of anything of value.
This is another sign of system racism where no matter how good the machine argues, the audience would just side with an inferior meatbag flapping their flesh.
How about some consistency in your outrage? If sexism is bad, then all forms of it are bad?
Correlation does not mean causation. It could be the case that more intelligent kids, that also have higher capacity for moral reasoning, are attracted to video games.
"crypto bro bent on accumulating flashy trophies" ? Misandry much?
it's that speech can promote violence. Until you understand the argument, the best you'll ever be able to do is logical fallacies.
"Can promote" is not a an argument, it is a hypothetical without any kind of attribution of responsibility.
No, it's a conditional which denotes the fact that not all speech promotes violence. This is a lot simpler than you want it to be. Reality doesn't work the way I want it to either, but I don't pretend otherwise.
No, it isn't a conditional, as it can't be evaluated objectively. How could you possibly create objective standard around "can promote others to act in violence"? This is how you end up with blasphemy laws.
Any common sense reading of net zero greenhouse gasses includes manufacturing though, why would you assume it doesn't?
If you look at lifetime emissions (manufacturing, shipping from China) of solar panels, then subtract lifetime energy produced you end up with a negative number for anywhere but Arizona and similar places. So how are you suppose to get to 100% renewable and net-zero? At best you could probably do single-digit % solar and have net zero after major breakthroughs in recycling, manufacturing, mining, refining, transportation if you run carbon capture from some of that produced energy.
That hypothetical eventual is in a very distant future, because for now there not even a recycling program for these panels. Plus, manufacturing is far, far from being sustainable and environmentally friendly. For foreseeable future solar panels is just outsourcing pollution to China. Not a bad idea, but it is far from net zero.
It's not that speech is violence
I am glad we agree that speech is not violence, and treating it as such is wrong.
it's that speech can promote violence. Until you understand the argument, the best you'll ever be able to do is logical fallacies.
"Can promote" is not a an argument, it is a hypothetical without any kind of attribution of responsibility. The fallacy you are trying to sneak into this argument is that if speech can be shown to promote an action, no matter how reasonable such action in response to speech is, then speaker should be held responsible for such action. An example of this principle would be, you ask me to get a coffee, I go rob a coffee shop and now you are an accomplice to robbery.
People enacting violence should be held responsible for said violence. Stop using safety from hypothetical violence by unreasonable people to try to censor ideas you find objectionable, you jack booted regressive e-thug.
It is telling that you would rather herp a derp about Trump than speak about original point - speech is not violence. Trump is as bad as it gets, but going full SJW to get rid of him is not a worthwhile trade-off. For now checks and balances are mostly containing him, and one of those checks is freedom of speech that you working hard on undermining.
Also, I find your post deeply offensive, hence it must be you enacting violence on me.