Slashdot Mirror


DC Cancels Comic Where Jesus Learns From Superhero After Outcry (theguardian.com)

AmiMoJo writes: A new comics series in which Jesus Christ is sent on "a most holy mission by God" to learn "what it takes to be the true messiah of mankind" from a superhero called Sun-Man, has been cancelled by DC Comics. The move follows a petition that called it "outrageous and blasphemous". The Second Coming series, from DC imprint Vertigo, was due to launch on 6 March. Written by Mark Russell and illustrated by Richard Pace, its story followed Jesus's return to Earth. "Shocked to discover what has become of his gospel," he teams up with a superhero, Sun-Man, who is more widely worshipped than him.

348 comments

  1. Damn... by rnmartinez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounds like something I would totally read.

    1. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, totally.

    2. Re:Damn... by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always The Last Hangover on Netflix.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:Damn... by psergiu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's the Japanese version.
      Saint Young Men

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    4. Re:Damn... by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really? Because it sounds like hot garbage to me. I'm guessing DC agreed since they didn't fight very hard for it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:Damn... by Ragnarok89 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This. I'm not a reader of comic by any stretch of the imagination, nor am I religious at all. However, the idea behind this story sounds intriguing. Not only would it be interesting to see what Jesus would think of what became of His Gospel, but of us as well. The idea of him having a discussion with a superhero who is "worshiped" more than Him sounds fascinating... Especially since the "worship" would be of a completely different kind.

      Imagine the discussion about superpowers? Gifts of God to a select few? Were they Chosen? Was it random? Did God have anything to do with it? Do superpowers make them "more" than Jesus is (given He can't fly, no super strength, no laser vision, etc). This would be an incredible analysis/discussion on what it means to be a superhero vs the son of God.

      I can only imagine some of the other discussions and story arcs that might have come from this premise. A shame we'll never know.

    6. Re:Damn... by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      So Mr. Know it all about stories, what would be a good story?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Damn... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Really? Because it sounds like hot garbage to me. I'm guessing DC agreed since they didn't fight very hard for it.

      It all sounds like hot garbage to me... never personally understood comic book-love, but to each their own. A lot of people probably don't like what I like... ... nonetheless, them cancelling this will probably make whatever editions they've already published valuable in the future.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing that simple hyphen placement can change the meaning of a phrase from "loving comic books" to "loving books in a humorous fashion"

    9. Re:Damn... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. I'm not a reader of comic by any stretch of the imagination, nor am I religious at all. However, the idea behind this story sounds intriguing. Not only would it be interesting to see what Jesus would think of what became of His Gospel, but of us as well. The idea of him having a discussion with a superhero who is "worshiped" more than Him sounds fascinating...

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps:
      Preachy,
      Blasphemous,
      or Boring.

      If you get too much into moral conduct it could come across as preachy. If Jesus has any flaws, or resorts to kicking arse, it could come across as blasphemous... trying too hard to avoid either of the above could become boring.

      A skilled writer could probably come up with some very intriguing story lines as you suggest. But if a less than stellar writing team is involved if would end up a disaster.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    10. Re:Damn... by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Funny

      Literally anything else. This premise makes the Emoji Movie sound like a brilliant idea.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    11. Re:Damn... by ilguido · · Score: 1

      never personally understood comic book-love, but to each their own.

      There are good comics out there, even though superhero comics are usually rubbish.

    12. Re: Damn... by rnmartinez · · Score: 1

      Yeah, true it would be easy to botch but it should be out there. Seems like a waste of resources.

    13. Re:Damn... by glitch! · · Score: 2

      Do superpowers make them "more" than Jesus is (given He can't fly, no super strength, no laser vision, etc).

      Give Jesus the special power of knocking over tables with a wave of his hand and give him a magic bull-whip that glows when a banker is near.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    14. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps:
      Preachy,
      Blasphemous,
      or Boring.

      Just stay clear of preachy and boring.
      Being blasphemous is more a virtue than a crime and has been a part of comedy for a long time.

      Either way I doubt it will be more outrageous than the source material.

    15. Re:Damn... by tomthepom · · Score: 1

      If Jesus has any flaws, or resorts to kicking arse, it could come across as blasphemous...

      A non-blasphemous, flawless Jesus would be, pretty much by definition, both preachy and boring.
      Not quite sure why you would even list blasphemy as a 'trap'. Even though it's been done before, a blasphemous, flawed, kick arse Jesus would be the only hope of making any Jesus story even vaguely interesting. At the very least it might garner enough outrage to sell a few copies.

    16. Re:Damn... by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      You would think so, and you would be right until you figured out that true omnipotence brings impotence. It's a game of not exercising your powers, and rather influencing those around you. Very much like C-Level office politics. You rule the world, seas will rise when you give the word, and how many people need to die so that you can fish from your balcony?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    17. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps:
      Preachy,
      Blasphemous,
      or Boring.

      But Jesus, whether he was historical or a meme, was/i> a heretic {"Blasphemous.") quite different from his groupies who made a religion out of it.

      For example, Contrast a Jesus who rebuked his groupies for driving away people doing good works who "were not one of us" with the exclusivity panderd by those groupies. as in Acts. There is also the current prosperity theology scam (send you rent money to reverend Ike and you will be blessed by winning the lottery, curing your mother's cancer, ...) All things Jesus expressly denied. And let's not mention how Jesus saw political power as a demonic temptation (yes, I'm lookin at you, the "religious" right.).

    18. Re:Damn... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps: Preachy, Blasphemous, or Boring.

      It would be hard to write one that didn't fall in to all three of those.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    19. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turning water into wine is an awesome power...

    20. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... because the corrupted x-ian church will not tolerate being held accountable for its behavior

      FTFY

    21. Re:Damn... by hierofalcon · · Score: 0

      You could always, you know, read the source and find out exactly what He does think about the state of the world - try Daniel, Revelation, assorted minor prophets, the Olivet prophecy recorded in a couple of the Gospels. That'd also give you a clue about what He thinks of worship of other gods (Norse mythology included).

      If you're curious about superpowers or any of your second paragraph of questions, there's a lot of the rest of the Bible you could read. You'd find the superheros aren't really worth much compared to God.

    22. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sun god thing didn't work out so well for King Tut, either.

    23. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you underestimate Jesus. That guy went down hard on money changers and fig trees.

    24. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if a less than stellar writing team is involved if would end up a disaster.

      The people they hired are not comic book pros. They are SJW outsiders that literally hate comic book fans. These people don't even know what Vertigo was to DC. Zoe Quinn? Rob Sheridan? Tina Horn? These people are NOT comic book writers. What people have seen thus far is that the new Vertigo comics are absolute SJW political trash. Some of the comics pretty much openly promote racism against whites. I expect this type of garbage from Marvel Comics, not DC Vertigo. Read them yourselves.

    25. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A skilled writer could probably come up with some very intriguing story lines as you suggest. But if a less than stellar writing team is involved if would end up a disaster.

      In other words a *cowardly, politically correct team* MIGHT get away with a watered down story.

      Got it. Just go watch "The Man From Earth"

    26. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That sun god thing didn't work out so well for King Tut, either.

      Tutankhamun? I think you mean Amenhotep/Akhenaten.

      The Sun god thing didn't work out very well for Akhenaten.

    27. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be more interesting if it was a world completely devoid of religion. How would that look?
      How would people cope with extreme heartache and loss?
      How would people think of death?
      Would people stop fighting?

      Take it another step further: a world devoid of countries, sports teams, gangs, political affiliations, racism, differing brands of pickup truck, clothing brands, etc..? If you take away all the things that clump is into neat little buckets, the implications are profound.

    28. Re:Damn... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I would have thought a graphic novel of where Jesus uses Linux to Hack the servers in Rome a more entertaining read.

    29. Re:Damn... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Flawless Jesus would not necessarily be boring, or preachy. In fact, you could make him very real human emotions.

      Imagine the struggle of always being perfect. It would be tiresome to everyone around him, and he'd probably be very lonely during large stretches of life.

      And he wouldn't be "preachy" because that has a definitive negative connotation. To come across as not "preachy", he'd have to have perfect execution in whatever he did.

      Writing such a character would be nearly impossible long term, as contradictions would appear and cause failures, which would indicate less than perfect Jesus.

      And for the record, the Jesus in the bible did kick ass, with a scourge (whip, with nail bits) that one time. ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    30. Re:Damn... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      It's pushing the borders of that "blasphemous" label, but I'd recommend Adam Black's comic "Locus". The actual blasphemous parts are supporting details for a bigger story about the sort of things a deity might fear.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    31. Re:Damn... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      How about one where Mohammed is sent on "a most holy mission by God" to learn "what it takes to be the true messiah of mankind" from a superhero called Sun-Man?

      They picked what they thought would be a low-hanging fruit.

    32. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't consider reading it either, but anything that pisses of theists gets my seal of approval.

    33. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, why anyone in 2019 still reads about Jesus is a mystery to me as well. Enough with the fairy tales

    34. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Republican Jesus you're thinking of. The real Jesus came down hard on the moneylenders.

    35. Re:Damn... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Do superpowers make them "more" than Jesus is (given He can't fly, no super strength, no laser vision, etc).

      So, raising the dead, resurrection, transmutation of materials, walking on water and hands on healing (to name a few) don't cut it?

    36. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus did kick ass, though. Remember the story in the Bible about how he flipped over merchant tables and literally whipped them out of the church for disrespecting the house of His father?

    37. Re:Damn... by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps:
      Preachy,
      Blasphemous,
      or Boring.

      It would be hard to write one that didn't fall in to all three of those.

      South Park managed to pull it off without falling into any of those three through the Super Best Friends. Nope, not blasphemous either; since you have to be religious to be able to commit blasphemy, due to it being a religious law and not secular.

      Or was Seaman blasphemy against poor Aquaman?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    38. Re:Damn... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      But you have to look away while he is doing the transformation.

      His main super power is self resurrection.

      Now come, Swallow!

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    39. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your optimism shows you haven't read comics in a decade. With DC/Marvel at the wheel, there's only one way this comic would have come out: preachy pretentious crap.

    40. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus as written in the gospels is a fairly witty character and media that captures his essence isnâ(TM)t going to be "preachy" or boring.

      But leave it to the fundamentalists and evangelicals who would want to make this sort of media to craft a new Jesus in exactly that boring and preachy image. In fact they are the sorts of people that Iâ(TM)m sure the Jesus in this canceled comic would lament.

    41. Re:Damn... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Jesus did kick ass, though. Remember the story in the Bible about how he flipped over merchant tables and literally whipped them out of the church for disrespecting the house of His father?

      That's true, although, my favourite story is when he tied his ass to a palm tree and walked into Jerusalem.

      That was a true miracle. Either that, or Jesus was related to the stretchy man from that group of 4 that has that rock man in it. (name escapes me... sorry, not a comic book person).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    42. Re:Damn... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 2

      South Park managed to pull it off without falling into any of those three through the Super Best Friends. Nope, not blasphemous either; since you have to be religious to be able to commit blasphemy, due to it being a religious law and not secular.

      The environment changed in between Super Best Friends (aired July 2001) and 201 (aired 2010). In Super Best Friends, Muhammad was drawn, and it caused no controversy. In 201, Comedy Central forced all depictions of Muhammad to be heavily censored over Matt's and Trey's objections, even though it treated Muhammad with respect, the only "offense" being he was depicted.

      Super Best Friends was pulled in 2010 and is no longer available for purchase.
      200 and 201 are similarly unavailable and has not re-aired since its premiere.

      It's pretty clear that there was nothing wrong with the episodes (especially compared to how other figures, religious or not, get lampooned), but Islamic radicals have shown a willingness to murder anyone in any country for any offense.

    43. Re:Damn... by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Frankly, those aren't very flashy "superpowers". Transmutation of materials and walking on water aren't nearly as impressive as super strength, shooting lasers, or flying. Healing and raising the dead, on the other hand are pretty impressive powers in their own right, but those powers push the user into a supporting role. In stories, the healer keeps the other people alive so they can do their stuff, the healer is rarely the main protagonist in a heroic epic. The healer tends to be the sidekick.

      Although, the transmutation ability could become a first class ability if it's scaled and applied correctly. Imagine a man who can transmute a wall into air with a wave of his hand or the reverse, or who could wave away a hail of bullets, instead of, say, turning a jug of water into wine.

      As I was thinking about this, I realized that on many levels, Dr. Manhattan's power are just the scaled up powers of Jesus, except, of course, that I don't think that Dr. Manhattan could actually return the dead to life. I think the point, is that while Biblical Jesus has amazing powers for the real world, in a superhero comic book world, his powers are far less impressive than those of many well-known superheroes.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    44. Re:Damn... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      If you take away all the things that clump is into neat little buckets, the implications are profound.

      You might as well say "if only we didn't act like human beings, or living creatures."

    45. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because the guy tried to reform the Jewish church and make people treat each other better? Maybe heâ(TM)s up there with other folks that died trying to help others love each other in a world that can be unjust and repressive?

      I guess we should stop reading about MLK, Gandhi, and Buddha because some Christian touched your butt one time?

    46. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Mr. Lennon.

    47. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They picked what they knew would just make people angry, but not blow shit up. Because let's face it. Muslims blow shit up. Christians don't.

    48. Re:Damn... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      If Jesus has any flaws, or resorts to kicking arse

      Like he did in the temple? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    49. Re:Damn... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Jesus only had to be a seventh level cleric! (Not sure about new rules).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    50. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write it yourself... Change the hero's name and any other details that would entanglement you with DC and go make something wonderful.

    51. Re: Damn... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Call him Buddy Christ, that'd work.

    52. Re:Damn... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      social mediaâ(TM)s anger-made-easy platforms

      Love that phrase, will have to remember it for future use.

    53. Re:Damn... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult to write such a comic though that wouldn't fall into one of three traps: Preachy, Blasphemous, or Boring.

      It would be hard to write one that didn't fall in to all three of those.

      South Park managed to pull it off without falling into any of those three through the Super Best Friends. Nope, not blasphemous either; since you have to be religious to be able to commit blasphemy, due to it being a religious law and not secular.

      Or was Seaman blasphemy against poor Aquaman?

      True but that was one episode not a whole thing. the 200 and 201 double did get a little preachy though.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    54. Re: Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking Jebus, but yeah, yours works as well.

    55. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was supposedly a story about the Christian God. Christians believe that God knows everything: Omniscient, Omnipotent (OmNomNomNom). Christians also say that the father, son, and holy ghost are all the same. I'm NOT a Christian, yet I know this much. I could be wrong, but I'm 97.5% sure of what I stated. If those statements are indeed correct, then what could Jesus/God gain from hanging out with a mortal, even if that mortal is a super-hero? That premise is ridiculous. If you think this is interesting, you're better off reading the story of the Hindu deities. At least in those stories, there is a story arc about the creator believing they are separate from the creation and thus able to be fooled by others.

    56. Re:Damn... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Christians don't want their kids reading Harry Potter because it tells stories of sorcery (other than god's). Doesn't that mean that the entire concept of superheroes is blasphemous on it's face?

  2. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the children!

    1. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Judge and my therapist says I shouldn't.

  3. Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by hiroshimarrow · · Score: 5, Funny

    and someone would get crucified if it were one that was less forgiving.

    1. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe replace him with Allah. What do you think would happen next?

    2. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >What do you think would happen next?

      Probably someone in some nerd news comment section correcting you where you meant to say Muhammad?

    3. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much the only religion unarguably less forgiving than Christianity is Islam. Buddha, Mani, Zoroaster, Confucius, and Rael (for a modern example) are some examples that are NOT Muhammad.

    4. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Maybe replace him with Allah. What do you think would happen next?

      Same person. Or god. Or whatever.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    5. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny thing.

      Muslims believe that Muhammad was a Prophet who was divinely inspired by God, but not a God himself.
      Co-incidentally, they also put Jesus into the Prophet category and reject any idea of the Trinity or godliness of Jesus.

      Hilarity ensues

    6. Re:Remove Jesus, insert other religious figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe replace him with Allah. What do you think would happen next?

      Same person. Or god. Or whatever.

      Need a -1 Ignorant vote. Or whatever.

  4. No problem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ignore those touchy bigot Christians and just switch the book to use Muhammad and the religion of tolerance and peace. That works...right?

    1. Re:No problem.... by mpercy · · Score: 1

      Islam is a religion of peace...an Brutus is an honorable man.

    2. Re:No problem.... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Brutus is indeed honorable by helping removing a dictator abusing the system. We should all strive to show the same strength and determination!

    3. Re:No problem.... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Brutus, at great personal risk, assassinated a criminal who had seized power from the established civil government by force of arms in order to escape trial, demolished all limitations upon the power that one individual may wield, and established himself as an unrestrained and unaccountable dictator for life.

      Sic semper tyrannis.

  5. Middle Ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Muslim theocracies are all stuck in the Middle Age. It is as if Enlightenment never happened for them.

    Oh, wait...

  6. Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if this is real, then it may finally be time for Norwegians to stand up and demand the halt of this blasphemous portrayal of Thor Odinson, the god of Thunder!

    1. Re: Thor by Frankzy · · Score: 2

      Just Norwegians? What about Swedes and Danes?

    2. Re:Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thor doesn't care, he is badass and he has a hammer.
      By contrast, Jesus was nailed to a cross...

    3. Re: Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just Norwegians? What about Swedes and Danes?

      The Swedes are blasphemous non-believers, and everyone knows that the Danes killed Thor!

    4. Re:Thor by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      The Norse deities would probably be quite pleased by their appearance in comics, which are pretty much modern day sagas.

    5. Re:Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this analogy. It is obviously ok to misinterpret gods that are not real. See? I am talking shit about Thor and he didn't choke me yet with my own asshotq3Q#$6tY%TG [NO CARRIER]

    6. Re:Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying Thor had something to do with it?

      Was Jesus a Christian, or a Jew? Is there no irony?

    7. Re:Thor by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Norse myths are great. I recommend Neil Gaiman's take on them, especially the recent BBC adaptation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Thor by Evtim · · Score: 1

      There's only one God, m'am, and I'm pretty sure He does not dress like that!

    9. Re:Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when some people were complaining about Heimdall being portrayed by a black man in the MCU and got called racist for it? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    10. Re:Thor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it may finally be time for Norwegians to stand up and demand the halt of this blasphemous portrayal of Thor Odinson, the god of Thunder!

      Or as he's better known: Sparkles, lord of the clap.

    11. Re:Thor by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying Thor had something to do with it?

      Was Jesus a Christian, or a Jew? Is there no irony?

      Jesus was a Jew, raised in the Jewish faith. He reformed much of the tradition Jewish leaders added through the centuries, but kept the faith intact.

    12. Re:Thor by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Until his followers later tossed almost all of the Jewish aspects of the religion away as the new religion adapted to more easily fit with Roman culture.

    13. Re:Thor by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Until his followers later tossed almost all of the Jewish aspects of the religion away as the new religion adapted to more easily fit with Roman culture.

      Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. (Matthew 5:17-18 NASB)

      Christians kept the religion while removing cultural traditions. Blood sacrifices were no longer required, because Jesus fulfilled that part through his atonement.

    14. Re:Thor by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Blood sacrifices. Dietary laws. Circumcision. Most of the festival observances. By the time Christians were done removing those 'cultural traditions' they wasn't much left to mark the religion as Jewish in origin at all.

    15. Re:Thor by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    16. Re:Thor by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Blood sacrifices. Dietary laws. Circumcision. Most of the festival observances. By the time Christians were done removing those 'cultural traditions' they wasn't much left to mark the religion as Jewish in origin at all.

      Jesus is our Paschal Lamb - he fulfilled the need for further blood sacrifice; all previous sacrifices were symbolic of the sacrifice Jesus would make. Festivals that got left by the wayside were mostly cultural. Circumcision and dietary restrictions were cause of conflict between early Christians who were Jews by blood and early Christians who were Pagans. Revelation introduced these practices, so revelation was needed to end them. What was left was the theology. Yes, Christianity evolved from Judaism. Christians equate Jesus with Jehovah of the Jewish faith.

  7. April Fools! by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is an april fools joke right? Who would greenlight this?

    Or did Southpark acquire DC comics? Will Jesus defeat Santa Claus?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who would let a religious majority dictate art in a free society?

    2. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all twelve reindeer

    3. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot the /s tag.

      Try drawing Mohamed in a comic.

    4. Re:April Fools! by turp182 · · Score: 2

      Let's ask Brian Boitano!

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    5. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >âWho would let a religious majority dictate art in a free society?
      Think of it like copyright protection, DC comics is infringing on their brand
      AND it could never go the other way, religion could never start using DC comic superheros to spice up Sunday school lessons for kids

    6. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm...established commercial interests who by virtue of being established generally don't go out of their way to insult the majority maybe? As the GP noted, Trey Parker does go out of his way to do that. No one is dictating anything. It's the bussiness's own self-interest in not doing stupid shit as a sideline.

    7. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would greenlight this?

      Most likely? A Jew.

    8. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >âWho would let a religious majority dictate art in a free society?
      Think of it like copyright protection, DC comics is infringing on their brand
      AND it could never go the other way, religion could never start using DC comic superheros to spice up Sunday school lessons for kids

      I hope the last was in jest as it takes very little time to find that the churches do just that

      https://www.pinterest.com/pin/...

    9. Re: April Fools! by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      plus Olive, the other reindeer.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    10. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's not.

    11. Re: April Fools! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not that easy, all that beard and the towel on the head... Stick to Jesus. A halo is easier to draw than a hairdo on fire.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: April Fools! by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So instead of getting shot at, you just get censored due to religion...It's better, for sure, but that doesn't make religion better. It's just a religion, you (not you literally, the figurative you) believe what the heck you want and others can do what the heck they please, including drawing comics about your figurehead. Drawing Jesus comics doesn't infringe on your religious rights; however, if you decide to censor, or worse, retaliate against the creators, that just means religion is given way too much power or you're a terrorist.

    13. Re:April Fools! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It sounds kinda interesting. Say Jesus came back today, he would be competing for YouTube views with Beyonce and PewDiePie. Okay it's comics so it has to be a superhero in spandex, but the basic premise is there, and was probably an issue back in his time.

      These days there would also be a backlash against an SJW telling people what to do and making them feel guilty about stuff. Then there is the way his teachings have been re-interpreted and corrupted from their original meaning over the last 2000 years. The outrage seen when people discover that their favourite character is actually gay would be multiplied by a million when Jesus introduces his boyfriend to the world.

      Seems like he would need a PR manager at the very least.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:April Fools! by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Jesus wouldn't be gay, he'd be bi- or pan-sexual. Jesus loves everybody!

    15. Re:April Fools! by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      I am a religious person, but I don't see this story blasphemous myself. Currently in our culture there is a disconnect between the teachings from the Christian traditions and the actual actions and call of actions from many predominate Christian leaders.

      I feel the outcry is because the hypocrisy that we all face is being exposed, and the one thing everyone doesn't want is to be shown that they are wrong or immoral.

      A lot of "Religious" people want is a simple If you do these things then you are good. However the Christian teaching actually offers a more complex set of morality then most of us want to deal with. A story set in modern times I feel would help reinforce the Christian teaching, in a non-dogma related media.

      If well written this could be a powerful story to allow people to re-assets their stances and actions, without having to be all preachy. Because people don't like to show they are wrong or immoral, if they can come to the realization themselves, then all the better.

      I expect there would be some outcry, but those are often from the same groups that just hate comic books anyways. I guess it sparked a bigger nerve.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    16. Re:April Fools! by malkavian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, you've fallen into the age old trap of believing that a deity/messiah would behave the way you want.
      I have a sneaky suspicion that the any returned Jesus would decry the SJWs as much as the political machinations of the church/political parties and the rest of the divisive ideologies.

    17. Re: April Fools! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The Religious Majority didn't Dictate it, DC wouldn't be put in jail for their comic book. However... as you state it is the Majority, so I expect declining profits would be the reason to stop it.
      It is a redefined version of progress just because someone can do a thing, it doesn't mean they must do that thing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, Jesus is returning. And He will have no competition for attention at all.

    19. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is this really any different that them deciding not to move ahead with a show that featured gay people in some unfavorable way due to a huge response from gays?

      Bet you'd support that 100%

    20. Re:April Fools! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I am a religious person

      Why?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    21. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't choose whether to be gay, you do choose whether to follow a religion

    22. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mad because edgy little atheist twats aren't a large enough to get this drivel pushed through?

    23. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys make stories about heroes, they are not heroes themselves. We are coalescing into a tech driven hive mind.

    24. Re:April Fools! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jesus went against the grain of society, stoop up for the oppressed, advocated equality and social justice for all, disliked the 1%... He even sent himself death threats and his followers have a near-religious fervour. Eventually conservatives got fed up with his BS and constantly claiming to be the victim - "waaah thy nailed me to a cross waaah!" Suck it up, Jesus.

      Sounds like an SJW to me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we are mad that there are too many people that are so insecure about their beliefs and successfully get in the way. Why aren't you mad?

    26. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure he would be mistaken for the anti-Christ and quickly get nailed to the cross. The Christians and Muslims would be unitied in the decision.

      Or he will get put into rehab and tons of drugs.

    27. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Jesus comic was the least offensive comic in the new Vertigo lineup. The rest was 100% identity politics on crack. This reboot is some of the worse comics in DC history. The Jesus comic actually might have been the only good one being released. Given the politics of the comic book industry, I'm actually shocked that they killed this comic. Usually, SJW hate for whites, males, heterosexuals, Christians and binary (slur for people who are not trans) is openly celebrated by Image, DC Comics, and Marvel. When you see them complaining about Nazis, they are talking about about normal comic book fans. Comic book fans are treated like terrorists. If you criticize any of these comic book companies, they'll literally dox you and try to ruin your life and get you fired. You'll get banned by the comic book cons.

      I switched over to European graphic novels and manga years ago. Americas comic book industry is trash tier media that's overpriced to boot.

    28. Re: April Fools! by orlanz · · Score: 2

      Only a little religious and not Christian but I will take a stab. For me, it's mentally comforting. And God is a personal and selfish concept for me.

      I understand it isn't necessary for others but it is for me. And it adds quite a bit of relief and quiet internal happiness to believe that there is a higher power above me; above all humans. That one day they would answer for their transgressions. And wrongs not as defined by me but as defined by a greater, more fair power. Kind of like an idealistic Judge. I find it easier to let things go and not become preoccupied with something that happened in traffic and ruin the rest of my good day. I can judge all transgressions before me, but don't have the burden of executing a just punishment.

      I have found my need to talk, ask, beg, thank, and joke with my inner voices I call various Gods to be not only comforting, but also supportive, strengthening, and therapeutic.

      I know some others who believe in their beliefs for similar if not the same reasons. I am sure there are many more that have yet other reasons. To each his own.

      Maybe I am mentally disabled in some way and this is my way to cope with society or appear normal to others. I could probably get the same treatment with drugs and therapy. Or maybe a cure. But that's OK, I am good with the way I am.

    29. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't. The comic book industry hasn't had any problems being anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian, anti-Republican, anti-American, and anti-heterosexual, and anti-binary gender. They have never had an issue offending these groups. The Jesus comic was the least offensive in the lineup. The other Vertigo comics are failing. I think they are using your argument to justify the new Vertigo failures.

    30. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how you incorrectly define an SJW as "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit", of course you would incorrectly think that your opponents would call Jesus an SJW.

    31. Re: April Fools! by Rolgar · · Score: 0

      Consider a different spin on it. A new comic book comes out and writes some famous scientists or anti-creationist personalities, for instance Neil Degrasse Tyson or Bill Nye, interact with other characters in the comic where the characters Niel and Bill on the page do or believe things that are not necessarily in line with what the real life guys actually believe. Say they time travel and find out the earth is less than 7000 years old and fake Neil or Bill converts to creationism. Perhaps the comic has them 'evangelizing' other scientists and converting them to creationism, and those individuals (either fake or real scientists) also convert, but maybe not all of them. Is it fair to take their image and use it to contradict what they actually believe. I'm sure everybody would say that that is not allowable?

      Well, returning to Jesus, who is to say that the Jesus as portrayed in the comic is an accurate portrayal of the actual Jesus. If 95% of Christians come up with a dozen ways that the Bible contradicts the comic, does the comic need to print a retraction? The guy writing the script may be serious or not. He may agree with the Bible or not. But whoever writes this is going to put out his opinion, and lots of kids will probably take it at face value even though it's guaranteed to get important things wrong every issue, and most people who read those errors aren't going to recognize them.

      Of course, most readers of this site probably think it's all fantasy/fables/make believe, but what if it's not, and this is just one more way for people to be mislead.

    32. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what would he do?

    33. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a show that featured gay people in some unfavorable way due to a huge response from gays?

      Bet you'd support that 100%

      Isn't being gay unfavorable enough? Nobody made them come out of the closet.

      I'm not anti-gay, but pro-gay is not exactly the correct term. More of "to each their own", "live and let live", but don't keep throwing it in my face.

    34. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus did - he attacked the zealots for their hypocrisy and caring more about virtue signaling than actually doing good.

      AmiMoJo would be the first one demanding Jesus’ head because he tried to heal people without a medical license.

    35. Re: April Fools! by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're worried about the comic "getting things wrong?" Seriously?

      Jesus taught to feed the hungry, to treat strangers with compassion, to cloth those without, to look after the sick, to give to the poor, and to sell ones possessions and share so as there would be no needy.

      BUT, this is the US. In the US we have conservative "christians" who actively do exactly the opposite, and denounce the teachings of Jesus every chance they get.... and yet still call themselves christians. The biggest threat to Christianity is the fake conservative "christians" in the US who are adulterating and abusing his teachings EVERY SINGLE DAY. The only things they teach are being anti-abortion (Jesus never mentioned abortion being wrong, or being against it...even though herbal abortion was commonplace at the time), and being anti gay marriage (again, Jesus never mentions gay marriage). Conservative "christians" are not Christians, they're a cult of anti-Christians.

      But you're worried about if the comic books might get it wrong....

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    36. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair though, "punch nazis" is about the exact opposite of "let he who is without sin throw the first stone". And he once called Peter out for bullying somone who didn't completely follow the groupthink regarding charity.

      So there would probably be a lot of SJW's shocked to find Jesus calling them out for using methods that boil down to bullying dissenters, even though he agrees with their general premis.

    37. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who got censored here exactly? I don't see the government stopping them, nor do I even see any evidence of a boycott or pressure from retailers or anything else.

      In fact, I can't find anybody who actually knew about this until the controversy, so I suspect marketing here more than anything....

      This just sounds dumb to me, but you know what I would do about it? I just wouldn't read it.

    38. Re:April Fools! by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

      Probably someone with a great sense of humour. A visionary perhaps? Jesus Christ, vampire slayer was great

    39. Re: April Fools! by segwonk · · Score: 1

      "...even though herbal abortion was commonplace at the time)"

      Wait, what??
      How do I learn more about this?

      --
      - ------ Go 'til ya know.
    40. Re: April Fools! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      ((:-{>

      Mohammed.

      ((:-{>8

      Tranny Mohammed.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    41. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not nice to make Tranny jokes :-)

    42. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Jesus returned and was upset about how his followers warped his beliefs into all this hippy-love shit? We don't really have any good idea about the real JC, only what his followers wrote down 50+ years after his death. Maybe they twisted it all into their own thing, and the actual Jesus was really kind of a conservative dickweed? Maybe he beat Mary Madeline, hated gays, and secretly sexually abused children. Honestly, we don't know.

      The nice thing about writing about a pretty obscure guy 50 years after his death is you can make up pretty much whatever you want. Make it fit the times and what people desire. Ignore all the bad stuff, and turn the guy into a perfect human.

    43. Re: April Fools! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I do not know if "commonplace" would be accurate, but it's noteworthy that there is one reference to abortion in the bible. It's the 'ordeal of the bitter water' and consists of instructions to carry out an abortion in the event of suspected adultery. Old testament though, Numbers, so pre-Jesus.

    44. Re: April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Jesus saves, well, He'd better save Himself
      From the gory glory seekers who use His name in death

    45. Re:April Fools! by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't think I've ever seen it used in any other way.

      Here's the Webster's definition of SJW:

      SJW (noun): A term used by fuckwits to describe people they don't like.

      Seems accurate.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    46. Re:April Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus went against the grain of society, stoop up for the oppressed, advocated equality and social justice for all, disliked the 1%... He even sent himself death threats and his followers have a near-religious fervour.

      Sounds like Donald Trump.

      Went against the grain? Totally. Trump shifted the overton window, ignoring what almost everybody else thought was "conventional" politics (or general decent human behavior...)

      Stood up for the oppressed? Sure, all those racists and neo-nazis found a reason/excuse to come out of the hiding.

      Advocated equality and social justice for all? See above. Trump wants equality even for white men and nazis.

      Disliked 1%? Trump's a total outsider to the establishment elites. He never held political office before . A lot of 1%ers (e.g most establishment politicians, big tech companies, the MSM) hate him.

      Sent himself death threats? No concrete evidence AFAIK, but I'd believe it if the Russian investigations turn out something like that. Trump is no stranger to social media to say the least.

      His followers have a near-religious fervour? Double check. If AmiMojo gets paid to troll Trumpsters, he'd be as rich as those Russian hackers who helped Trump win.

    47. Re:April Fools! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      This is an april fools joke right? Who would greenlight this?

      Or did Southpark acquire DC comics? Will Jesus defeat Santa Claus?

      Vertigo Comics. Way back in the 80's, DC hired some writers who started doing stories for older audiences. One of these was Neil Gaiman who did Sandman off of DC characters but added his own. He's done several movies you've probably heard of and currently known for his books and TV show, American Gods. Anywa, there was still a Comics Code which prevented pretty much everything stories for older readers might want, so DC spun off the applicable series into Vertigo Comics which would not adhere to the Comics Code. They currently do mostly non-superhero stories and often in short series that is over once completed. THis sort of thing is right up their alley, and no doubt acts as a test market for what the DC parent company can or can't get away with, which was the original intention.

      Otherwise, you can always just go read the God Is Dead comic where all the gods, including Jesus, reappear on the world, and the (non-domgmatic) apocalypse that happens afterwards.

  8. Special fun-pak games section planned too by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    In the middle of the comic they were planning to have a connect-the-dots Mohamed image.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re: Special fun-pak games section planned too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhhh you edgy. Come make fun of Tibet and see what happens ;)

  9. Sounds pretty ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    hard to believe somebody would actually invest in this idea

  10. That sounds like a compliment! by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Outrageous and blasphemous"? Bring it on!

    There's always going to be some people who are pissed off at something. If you always listen to them, you'll never put anything out at all.

    They should have just doubled down and rolled with this.

    1. Re: That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! And for our next issue Jesus will meet the teenage mutant ninja turtles. Oh this is our sketch artist, crazy Ed of Crazy Eds Emporium of Poor Taste!

    2. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by thereddaikon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy to say when its Jesus and the worst you get is bad press. Show me how much you really believe in free speech. Do an arc on Mohammed.

    3. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It reminds me of when Kevin Smith made Dogma, which received similar backlash from Christian groups. Smith actually went out to one of the protests( which wasn't very large) and joined in with them, which was caught on film by a news crew covering it.

      Comic sales are in the tank and I don't think Christians are the main customer base for DC. If anything, the extra attention would just drum up sales for the first issue because people would buy it just to spite the holier than thou religious types.

    4. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's easy to beat up on the religion you know won't fight back. Wait, isn't that what bullies do, they only pick on people they know will turn the other cheek?

      Make a comic book with Mohammed in it. Show some actual bravery. Strike a blow for free speech. Je suis Charlie!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why make a comic book with Mohammed in it when the so-called "turn the other cheek" religion still throws a hissy-fit whenever somebody touches their religion?
      You're confusing who the bully is here.

    6. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to beat up on the religion you know won't fight back.

      Tell that to the abortion doctors shot and killed by "Christian" extremists. To be sure, the Muslim extremists have a commanding lead at the moment but if they can keep that lead remains to be seen..

    7. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same thing. The majority of Muslims live in 3rd world countries or come from them. When a 1st world country (ie US, European countries, etc) satirize Muhammad, it subconsciously reeks of bigotry and hatred due to their colonial past and Crusades. That's why there is more severe backlash for insulting Muhammad than Jesus. So please stop making the comparison between "peaceful" Christians and "violent" Muslims.

    8. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the weirdest, most BS justification I've seen of Islamic extremist violence in a long, long time. Let me make sure I'm getting these right, these violent attacks are just something that extremist Muslims do to Christians because Christians were assholes to them, and that intersectional murders and wars over Islamic interpretations are just stories from a dark age that they've moved on from?

      Of course it's not because they're still barbaric. It's OUR fault because we're like, patronizing or something, and some evil people did evil things 500 years ago. Totally relevant to today.

    9. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's quite a difference between Dogma (which was irreverent and, yes, arguably blasphemous in that it had an actor actually playing God, although it was far from the first movie to do that), and a plot that is based on the premise that Jesus (God) is ignorant and seeking enlightenment from a human. It's a whole step change in the level of blasphemy.

    10. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by eepok · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They could have just called Kevin Smith and asked, "Hey... we got these angry Christians... is this worth it?" to which he could respond, "Look, you know that's a stupid question. You're calling me because I wrote 'Dogma' which fucking killed it and you know it. Read the Wiki."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      300% return on investment on a film that was WIDELY protested due to blasphemy. And then people shut up about it.

    11. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Nobody gives a fuck about your "what about..." attempts to justify believing in fairy tales.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    12. Re:That sounds like a compliment! by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      Who said I was justifying anything? I am an atheist. I think you are the ones justifying your cowardice. Hating the religion of a bunch of people who aren't going to retaliate and the ones who really need ridicule get off. All because you know they will use violence and you're too much of a pussy to stand up what you believe in.

  11. Sun-Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is an allegory of Western Capitalism.

    1. Re:Sun-Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Sun-Man is Steve Jobs?

  12. Take my money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of this before, but now I want it badly.
    Thanks for the publicity, CitizenGo!

  13. Religious fundamentalism is always harmful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether it is middle-eastern suicode bombers, Vatican boy rapists, or this kind of fake-victimhood terrorism.

    Not being allowed to take the freedom of other people does not equal you having your freedom taken away, dear terrorists. It is not harm, to forbid somebody to harm you.

    And free speech is one of he most fundamental guaranteed freedoms.

    You even have the right to *say* you want to take the freedom of others.
    But we are not obliged to comply. And we have the right to say you are morons and terrorists.
    I know factual reality is not your thing, but in his case, such statements are not slander, as they are factually true.

    1. Re: Religious fundamentalism is always harmful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Religion is harmful. There is fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Religious fundamentalism is always harmful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You don't come across as very intelligent to me. You sound like a intolerant hater of people who don't share your atheist world view.

    3. Re: Religious fundamentalism is always harmful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Atheism has killed more people in the world than any religious institution.

    4. Re:Religious fundamentalism is always harmful. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1
      All fundamentalism is bad. This includes atheists.

      But we are not obliged to comply.

      Neither was DC, so what's your point? Oh, sorry. Wrote that before reading your last paragraph. Painting Christians as terrorists was your point.

  14. Just swap Jesus/Christianity with Muhammad/Islam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do it about that guy instead. I'm sure they wouldn't have to re-write much.

  15. "holy mission by God" by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Just like the Blues Brothers???

    1. Re:"holy mission by God" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I consider it a missed opportunity to see Jesus with shades. Would've been the coolest messiah ever. And turned water to beer.

      I can only do that the other way 'round.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"holy mission by God" by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I can only do that the other way 'round.

      Somehow, I don't think you're actually talking "water" anymore.

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:"holy mission by God" by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Just look it up. There are plenty of pics, statues with that.

  16. Eh - I'd still like to see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't completely new territory. Miracleman was notable for its release from the 'superhero' concept once the main character realized his life was a simplistic morality play written for children - and then decided to ACTUALLY start making things better for everyone.

    There's the usual beating someone with the same powers as them (basically superman), with horrific results, and then ... then they legitimately improve the world. Rebuilding, undoing death, creating a post-scarcity society, becoming part of the larger universe.

    And they didn't ignore or shy away from the religious overtones.

    Made for a really good exploration of concepts - shame that it was basically tied up in legal ownership muck for many, many years.

    Think of it this way - if we got time travel, or the ability to re-create things/people from the past - woudln't one of the absolutely first things folks would do would be to visit/recreate Jesus of Nasareth? Even if just to see what that story really was?

    This guy made a fictional story where the Jesus and God are lesser characters in a story. A certain self-proclaimed prophet Mohammad did the same thing, I suppose. There's a lot to learn as long as you don't take it as gospel, so to speak.

  17. Too bad these are Christians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other white meat^W^Wmiddle-eastern strain of psychotic terrorists.

    Not that there is a relevant difference. Just 500 years of age difference. In 500 years they will channel their inquisition amd witch burning urges int secretly raping children too. ;)

  18. Sun-O-God by circlekhaos · · Score: 1

    Long ago - late '60s or early '70s - among the counter culture comic books like Zap, there was Sun-O-God Comix that was pretty outrageous in a wacky way. So this is hardly new. Central character was a yeshiva student. It'd be considered wildly anti-Semitic now but I'm sure the Christian Right would be the most offended. After all, this was back in the '60s. The whole point was to offend people. Like long hair and beards and no bra. Shocking!

  19. Inconvenient Facts Removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DC Comics announced this book 3 months ago. Protests happened then and were ignored. It was only this week, one day after the publisher received their pre-order data, did they decide to cancel. That's not a coincidence.

  20. Typical racist bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can have a Norse superhero, you can have a black superhero but god forbid we get a Jewish superhero!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re: Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus IS God!!! The Holy Trinity is comprised of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. They're separate, yet at the same time, one in the same.

      Therefor, Jesus can not simply be a "Super Hero. He's far more than that be infinite magnatudes! He's GOD almighty!

    2. Re:Typical racist bullshit by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1, Informative
      Sorry to break your bubble. Superman was a Jewish immigrant.

      Superman’s possible Judaism shouldn’t be a surprise. The hero’s creators, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, were the children of Jewish immigrants. The comic book industry, where they spent a significant portion of their young careers, was created in New York by Jews like Max Ginsburg, Bob Kahn, and Jacob Kurtzberg, who hid their ethnicity behind names like Gaines, Kane, and Kirby. Over the years there have been scores of books and articles on the subject with punny names like Up, Up, and Oy Vey or “Mensch of Steel.”

    3. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have a Norse superhero, you can have a black superhero but god forbid we get a Jewish superhero!

      By day Moses Saderberg was your average high school student until one day his powers emerged and he became Mos-Sad, defender of the literate.

      In this episode he goes to the US as a foreign exchange student.
      Mos-Sad: "Holocaust sense *tingling*!
      So many literacy hating Nazis are here.
      How did this happen?"
      Then from behind him.
      "God damned kike immigrant, I will destroy you!"
      Mos-Sad spun around and there was a 600lb orange man in a red white and blue mobility scooter that was fueled by burning books.
      "Captain 'Merika!"

      That will play well in the red states I'm guessing..Well until they figure out "Captain 'Merika!" isn't the good guy. Next episode it will turn out the "Buffet Punisher" is not the good guy either. Then there is problem that comics include words with their pictures...

      Yeah, Jewish comic ain't happening in the US.

    4. Re:Typical racist bullshit by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

      What about Bernie Sanders?

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    5. Re: Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually believe that utter nonsense you just posted and are not just being sarcastic, then you do not belong on Slashdot, or any other website dealing in actual Facts, actual Truth, or anything regarding the Sciences, because you are a delusional idiot being led around by the nose by The Few, who have twisted your Santa Claus/Tooth Fairy/Easter Bunny-level fantasies about The Invisible Sky-God into a tool to control you and your behavior for their benefit. FFS get some help to get into reality.

    6. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey chris
      the expression is "burst" your bubble
      you know like the tires on the san jose bus when your fat wheezing ass shambles on it

    7. Re: Typical racist bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Right. He wouldn't work as a character in a story. I mean, who'd want to read about a perfect character, that's boring. Such characters are usually very uninteresting, bland and one-dimensional.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... no cape, can't fly, what kinda super hero is that supposed to be?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Would that the Opportunist had taken the opportunity to check out Wikipedia beforehand. Forty-three of them. I especially like Bernie Rosenthal.

    10. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism Man!

    11. Re: Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laugh every time I see physicists (which today are more like mathematicians and less like physicists, let alone scientists) struggle with "wave particle duality". They've completely fucked the Copenhagen interpretation (which no one really buys into anymore) and created an entire field of wankery below it.

      It's not a wave/particle duality. It's a field / perturbation / interaction (including observation) trinity.

    12. Re:Typical racist bullshit by meglon · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always the Hebrew Hammer.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    13. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A comic featuring a Jewish superhero existed 20 years ago.

    14. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David was a prototype for a Jewish superhero: small, fragile character compared to his adversary, armed with a puny weapon and secret knowledge. Not exactly a modern comic material. "Pen is mightier than sword" would be the catch phrase of such a character. Jesus allegories fit in the Jewish heroverse as much as cartwheeling Shiva making rude suggestions to Zeus, the known rapist, would.

    15. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey CDR, C.D.Reimer, creimer, etc.

      The important is that nobody "breaks" your lower teeth otherwise you would have none left!

    16. Re: Typical racist bullshit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine how hard it would be to write an omnipotent character in a superhero story. That would have to be the most boring story ever.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure if you break a bubble, it's gonna look just like it burst. Or are you saying you can burst it without breaking it?

    18. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are such a lunatic creimer! Also, you are so stubborn that you can't even admit your own mistakes.

      How is the anti Bill Maher campaign going you big dummy?

      Attacking well known people like this is sure a great strategy to insure your long tail revenue streams!

      No target is too large for creimer given creimer's size.

      You know what? Bill Maher is right, only lunatic dummies like yourself attach such an importance to Funko Poops and super heroes!

      The rest of the comic cons attendance is just normal people like me that watch this type of material once in a while and go to comic cons for fun. They are far from being retarded maniacs like yourself.

      Good luck, you fifty year old child!

    19. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer still has upper teeth in the back of his mouth, the kids in school couldn't manage to break it.

    20. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you break glass, there are glass shards everywhere. If you break a bubble, where are the bubble shards?
      Besides, Mr Published Author, you should know your English idioms a bit better he replied with his husky voice while tipping his baseball hat with his two big workman's fingers askance as you looked at the bubble bursting

    21. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CROFLOL! creimer's long tail revenue stream strategy bubble has been bursting for quite a while.

      What a stubborn idiot!

    22. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      face the fact that all the dick sucking you did in high school wore your teeth away

    23. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CROFLOL!

      Now that you mention it (I was watching one of his video while browsing slashdot), I was tempted to stick my thing in the area you mentioned for a brief moment. Visually, it made me feel like it was all soft and tender and waiting.

      Does this mean that I could somehow be gay?

    24. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer has ruined many of us
      i can no longer look at a woman and experience an erection
      instead all I see is creimer's hat and his big cartoon eyes
      I imagine they are as full of love as his other orifices

    25. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why not also change the bubble into something else that breaks
      be creative you fat dummy
      sorry to break your vase but you're dumb

    26. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Cryptofeces Lepidoptera Creimerus infestation is a serious problem. Not only are they capable of reproducing asexually like amoebas, they can also lay eggs hermaphroditically in unexpected places. They can disguise eggs as something useful to fool the unaware, sometimes pretending to be a haiku author, blogger, vlogger, or IT closet cleaner.

      Very dangerous. They can seemingly reproduce out of the cosmic background radiation, even if you step on twelve of them, there's always one you miss.

      Don't be fooled by the C. Lepidoptera Creimerus's innocuous, rolly-polly, and almost friendly appearance; despite its great size, stupid demeanor, and bedraggled toothless appearance, they have the hardiness of a tardigrade.

      Only a concerted, targeted downmodding campaign has been shown effective in controlling this dangerous pest.

      Experience shows that stopping such a campaign leads to C. Lepidoptera Creimerus returning within days.

      Don't let it happen again!
      --
      the biggest looser on Slashdot

    27. Re: Typical racist bullshit by aybiss · · Score: 1

      One Punch Man - watch it now!

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    28. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have a Norse superhero, you can have a black superhero but god forbid we get a Jewish superhero!

      God forbid, if they show a Jesus who is a time traveler who uses a Huawei smartphone !!

    29. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Here's another wikipedia article you might want to read. Maybe you won't miss one again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    31. Re:Typical racist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is another one I just spotted for you, dear friend:

      https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

      They seem to be all over the place. Please do something and/or tell me what I can do to help you.

  21. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this was a Muhammad comic.

    OH!! We don't have to imagine.. There was an example of this in France just a few years ago.

    How did that work out?

    1. Re:Imagine by radja · · Score: 1

      I've seen hundreds of Mohammed cartoons since the Charlie Hebdo massacre. In general, publishing a Mohammed cartoon isn't a problem.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    2. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you have. Uh huh.

    3. Re:Imagine by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      Depending GREATLY on what country you live in...

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  22. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds just as good as this "gem" of a show from the 90's

    get your cringe on:
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bible+man

  23. If someones faith is that shallow by pgmrdlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then they truly do not believe.
    I am religious, and have faith. But I also enjoy reading fiction that some would find blasphemy. What I read does not shake my faith. If these people are so offended, their faith has been brought into question. Then they are not as religious as they think they are.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    1. Re:If someones faith is that shallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't worry about their fate, they worry that it will be more difficult to introduce Jesus to potential new believers if Jesus was already introduced by DC Comics. The purpose of invoking "blasphemy" is to control the image of religion for marketing reasons.

    2. Re:If someones faith is that shallow by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      yes, absolutely.

      I have a friend who's pagan (first nations; not new age).
      When the evangalists come by his house to proselytize, he asks them "Why should I believe in your God? You don't."
      Their response is generally a good indicator of the sincerity of their faith.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    3. Re:If someones faith is that shallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it sounds... lame, but meh.

      Then again, I am more of a Deist myself. I think Jesus had some good ideas on how to treat each other (with love and tolerance), so I guess I could be considered a Christian still.

    4. Re: If someones faith is that shallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The protestors don't have much faith at all. Jesus can handle a friendly popularity contest with Light Bulb Guy, can't he? I don't hear Jesus complaining either. Why does the Son of God need anyone to defend him, anyway. Or kill for him. Or anything really. I think he'll be OK, and his Dad won't disown him and adopt Sun Guy. Probably. I mean, it is the 2010's. Jesus might decide he's really a woman inside, get an operation and then find true love with Sun Guy and have a whole mess of Ra-Jesus hybrid cherubs.

      Being a fundamentalist or religious isn't a problem. Being stupid is.

    5. Re:If someones faith is that shallow by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      What I read does not shake my faith. [If it does...'

      THAT was my exact line wrt: The Da Vinci Code. If a single movie can shake your faith, you don't have any to start with. "Protecting them" from evil movies, books, ideas, etc is just keeping the sheep together and dumb.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    6. Re:If someones faith is that shallow by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Same here. I both read the book and watched the movie. Neither bothered my faith at all. And I enjoyed both the book and the movie. The book was better of course, but that is besides the point.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  24. Re:The definition of a bully by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Jesus, Muhammad, Krishna, Xenu... same bull, other flavor.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Lame by dbrueck · · Score: 1

    I'm sad to see they buckled to a petition.

    To me the comic sounds dumb and offensive and likely to lose money, but it's far better to let the market prove this out than to preemptively censor them via an outrage posse.

    1. Re:Lame by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      They didn't cancel until the day after the pre-sales numbers came out. I think they DID wait for the market proof.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Lame by dbrueck · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you.

  26. Just curious here.... by mark-t · · Score: 0

    ... I'm wondering if there is any reason that this story is news here other than as fan service for readers that get satisfaction from bashing Christianity or other religions?

    1. Re:Just curious here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a 1st amendment issue DC flinched to avoid bad publicity. This is news in our secular society, Religion shouldn't dictate what other can do. That is a theocracy.

      And comic books, Duh...

    2. Re:Just curious here.... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters" I seem to have heard that around here once upon a time. Stereotypical nerds are interested in comics.

      On a different front, these guys probably didn't want the competition.
      Tthe R. Crumb book of Genesis came too late for poor little Sheldon Cooper.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Just curious here.... by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Do we need any other reason than making fun of people who believe in things that aren't real? This is News For Nerds.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    4. Re:Just curious here.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I was just curious... it seemed like a lot of posts were pointing in that direction when I commented, which is why I asked.

  27. A bit ironic by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1
    So I decided I would rather keep the story intact,” he said. “Nobody really wants a watered-down, one-size-fits-none version of this story, so they graciously agreed to let me have it back We also want a publisher who can get it to fans in the near future, so we hope to be able to announce a new home as soon as possible.”

    It looks like the story will get out, just that DC didn’t want the controversy.

    CitizenGo claimed the decision as a victory, telling Syfy Wire that Second Coming “portrays a false view” of Jesus, who is “not a failure”. It added: “Most children grow up reading about iconic DC superheroes like Batman, Superman, or Wonder Woman. It would be a shame to market this false view of Jesus as an equal read to these figures.”

    Let me get his straight. Stories about mythical persons who die, come back, have evil twins, cavort with God figures and can have multiple conflicting story lines are iconic but don’t you dare touch Jesus because someone my think your version is the one true story? I wonder if Wonder Woman would be so iconic to CitizenGo if she were gay. Maybe, just don’t put her likeness on a bus.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:A bit ironic by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They petitioned Portland to drop ads on busses featuring lesbians, so I'm guessing they would take a dim view of Wonder Woman being one.

      Of course an impractical skin-tight costume is fine.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:A bit ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They petitioned Portland to drop ads on busses featuring lesbians, so I'm guessing they would take a dim view of Wonder Woman being one.

      Yeah, but the important bit there is having a lesbian-or-not Wonder Woman on the side of a bus doesn't increase how much vomit needs to be cleaned up off the sidewalks.

  28. Re:Just swap Jesus/Christianity with Muhammad/Isla by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Jesus had the cooler story. And he was the better Copperfield.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Reminds me of the film Hamlet 2 by turp182 · · Score: 1

    It's a film I really enjoyed.

    It's about a high school theater production where Jesus comes back but has to be cool and he time travels to save characters from Hamlet. Super well made (it's a movie with an actual musical at the end).

    "Rock me, rock me, rock me sexy Jesus!":
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  30. So DC is bringing back "Bible Man" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Holy shitballs who thought this was a good idea.

    Just as taste of how shitty this idea is I present to you.

    BIBLE MAN!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV3thXw-pso

  31. Looking forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking forward to see their version of capitalism.

    1. Re: Looking forward by Evtim · · Score: 1

      It's already been described in Dune.
      Women breeders chained forever (like the latest Mad Max movie)... and they also made the most popular meat in the Empire. Crosbreed between slugs and swines if memory serves. Oh, and facedancers...

  32. Theocracy by sdinfoserv · · Score: 0

    Welcome the Theocracy of the United States. Where decisions are based in theology rather than capitalism, science or common sense. Sort of like those countries in the middle east the US has been at war with for almost 20 years.....

    1. Re:Theocracy by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And who says we don't live in a theocracy...

      Is the government threatening DC with fines/jail time/threat of life if they publish it?
      Is there any county, state, or federal law preventing DC from publishing it?
      Is there any county, state, or federal law preventing retailers from selling it?
      If DC were to publish it and retailers were to sell it, and people were to cause quantifiable harm to either of them as a result, would the government fail to arrest those who caused that harm?

      No, no, no, and no. Therefore, I can conclude that we do not, in fact, live in a theocracy.

      What we have is DC making a decision about what they want to publish. Exercising their right to the freedom of the press as they are choosing to not-publish something is basically the antithesis of what a theocratic government would do.

    2. Re:Theocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that false equivalency is beyond exaggerated. No one rioted, no death threats, no mobs, no bomb attacks. Just a petition to stop a pretty lame idea.

    3. Re:Theocracy by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Hush. There's an agenda at foot.

    4. Re:Theocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're a special kind of stupid. It's funny that people like you are the ones shouting loudly from the rooftops about how smart they are because they're an atheist.

    5. Re:Theocracy by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      We do.

      Just go outside and yell "the n word".
      Just try to say you don't want to participate in someones wedding ceremony or do anything that says you condone their lifestyle.
      Just try to say that people with a penis are boys, and people with a vagina are girls.

      The theocracy is real.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    6. Re:Theocracy by Megol · · Score: 1

      You got issues.

  33. Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Christians are acting as butthurt as the Muslims

    1. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let me know when the Christians try to murder everyone involved like Muslims would

    2. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You will note:

      1. There were no riots.
      2. No one died
      3. It didn't even make the national news until after the fact.
      4. There were no death threats

      Contrasts that with say, some series that portrays LBQTWERTY in a bad light.

      1. There would be protests.
      2. There would be boycotts.
      3. There would be mass Virtue Signalling on all the social media.
      4. There would be talk of how the LBQTWERTY is being attacked and could cost someone their life.
      5. There would probably be death threats.
      6. Some idiot Congressmaggot would try to hold hearings.

      And finally, contrast that with an animated series on Mohammad.

      Riots, murders, etc. You know thew drill from past experience.

    3. Re: Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a Christian, I say the concept is fascinating. Then again, I'm of the opinion that we've completely botched the gospel and the mission of the church, so " what would Jesus think of what we've made it today" resonates with me.

      That said, it would be very easy to muck up the writing for all the reasons posted earlier in this thread.

    4. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Let me know when the Christians try to murder everyone involved like Muslims would

      They've already done that.
      Then there where a couple of wars regarding how strict we would allow Christians to be that makes ISIS looks benign in comparison.

      Modern day Christians are mostly nice because they were beaten into submission, but judging from how some of them behave we might need another round of that to prevent them from becoming like ISIS again.

    5. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me know when the Christians try to murder everyone involved like Muslims would

      They've already done that.
      Then there where a couple of wars regarding how strict we would allow Christians to be that makes ISIS looks benign in comparison.

      Modern day Christians are mostly nice because they were beaten into submission, but judging from how some of them behave we might need another round of that to prevent them from becoming like ISIS again.

      Which wars were that? I don't remember any wars specifically about that unless you mean the crusades, and that's not what they were about either.

    6. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me know when the Christians try to murder everyone involved...

      The Crusades?

      Or the Spanish Inquisition.

      Shall I go on, or is that enough go get you started?

    7. Re:Holy shit. by Scarletdown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me know when the Christians try to murder everyone involved...

      The Crusades?

      Or the Spanish Inquisition.

      Well, I for one certainly was not expecting that...

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are speaking only of the Catholic (capital C) Church, not Christianity in general. Christianity is not monolithic. The Catholic Church throughout history been the face of the church because non-Catholics don't have a visible hierarchy, riches, etc. The prosperity TV "pastors" are all fake and only in it for the money. House churches, Eastern Orthodox, and some protestant denominations have had nothing to do with war, crusades, etc. All of that falls squarely on the Catholic Church, who have, over the centuries, twisted the scriptures to create their own religion that looks nothing like what God intended. Christ came to reconcile us to Him (God) through a relationship, not religion. Jesus was opposed to ritual for its own sake and said so. The Catholic Church lies and says it has been there since the apostles, but the early Christian writings from local witnesses who saw much of what transpired would vociferously argue otherwise.

      Emperor Constantine legalized Christianity in Rome for his own personal gain. He brought into it all manner of Roman pagan thinking and doctrine, hence the beginning of the CC. This did not occur until the 3rd century. There were Christians (unorganized) since Christ. The word "Christian" was not used until 43AD in the city of Antioch, and was initially used as an insult. The Catholics are now guilty of conflating their own beliefs and Islam--what is now being called "chrislam", a real heresy, since Yahweh and "Allah" are not the same thing. Allah was the "moon god" in pagan arabia and Mohommad used this to bring all the people under a "monotheistic" religion, which was born out of a cave by a guy who was a pedophile. Mohommed, since day one was turn or burn. God gives us free will to choose or reject Him. Islam DICTATES you submit. Islam literally means "submit". All of the woes in religion over the last 2k years are either from the CC or Islam.

    9. Re: Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reformation was a brutal era. They disagreed with each other by torturing and murdering after words failed.

    10. Re:Holy shit. by Linux+Torvalds · · Score: 2

      Then there was that whole Great Flood thing, but never mind that. Mysterious ways, etc., etc.

    11. Re:Holy shit. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      So how many centuries did you have to reach back to try to prove a point? He said "Christians", not "Christians that died 500 years ago."

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    12. Re:Holy shit. by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

      Except they haven't murdered anyone (that I am aware of) over a comic book.

    13. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I think you're overlooking that the publisher is already pulling the thing at the first peep of a protest. And Christian nutjobs are certainly not above protests (see the summary), boycotts (https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/sweet-jesus-ice-cream-chain-blasphemous-christian-petition-toronto-canada-a8277186.html), mass Virtue Signalling (see the regular talking point choirs from Fox and similar), schwalbing (e.g. the "war on Christmas"), death threats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_church_shooting, attacks on abortion doctors), or show hearings (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/oversight-panel-hearing-on-clinton-foundation-blows-up-as-gop-battles-its-own-witnesses).

    14. Re:Holy shit. by Megol · · Score: 1

      I could provide some examples, one well known being about 0.3 centuries ago, but I'll not do that. We all know that the result would be a no-true-christian argument of the quality that would equally apply to muslims, ..., buddhists. Instead let's just jump to the "logical" conclusion that nobody is ever killed because of religion.

    15. Re: Holy shit. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Currently Christian denominations number in the tens of thousands. All of which believe that all the other denominations have botched the gospel to some extent, and they alone have interpreted it correctly and follow it as intended.

    16. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://politicalislam.com/jihad-vs-crusades/

    17. Re:Holy shit. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's because stuff that perpetuates myths and stereotypes about LGBTQ people actually harms them in their daily lives, where as blasphemy just annoys a few people who secretly love the opportunity to write and angry letter to the local paper.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrasts that with say, some series that portrays LBQTWERTY in a bad light.

      1. There would be protests.
      2. There would be boycotts.
      3. There would be mass Virtue Signalling on all the social media.
      4. There would be talk of how the LBQTWERTY is being attacked and could cost someone their life.
      5. There would probably be death threats.
      6. Some idiot Congressmaggot would try to hold hearings.

      To this day, people of sexual and gender minorities face discrimination in hiring and employment, receiving medical treatment, and the legal system. LGBTQ youth are twice as likely to be physically attacked than their straight peers. 19% of transgender youth attempt suicide in the previous year. Where the most frequent concerns for straight kids is grades, the most frequent concerns for LGBTQ kids is not being accepted as human beings.

      So when you suggest there shouldn't be protesting, boycotts, or identifying that people's lives are potentially in danger through discrimination, you're arguing that you should continue to oppress another group of people. It just comes across as sad to me that folks who have experienced even a hint of discrimination, like nerds, would engage in discrimination themselves.

    19. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's because stuff that perpetuates myths and stereotypes about LGBTQ people actually harms them in their daily lives, where as blasphemy just annoys a few people who secretly love the opportunity to write and angry letter to the local paper.

      Drink! AmiMojo spews unsubstantiated Fox News level crap that could easily be said in the other direction and make just as much (as little) sense (e.g you could just as easily say LGBTQ folks secretly love the opportunity to write angry tweets and Christians are UNDER ATTACK from all these bad portrayals and stereotypes)

    20. Re:Holy shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how long has slashdot been home to christian fundamentalists and bootlickers?

    21. Re:Holy shit. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      And I for one was also not expecting some random AC to totally miss the obvious and obligatory Spanish Inquisition cue.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    22. Re:Holy shit. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How dare you compare me to Fox News!

      Also the 'J' is capitalized.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. It matters more by louzer · · Score: 1

    I am sure this will matter more than censorship of right wing views.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  35. Wrong religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems more fitting storyline for the "religion of peace".

  36. Jesus, the first Trump Republican by NEDHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Makes up stories, claims to do AMAZING THINGS, lies about where he spent the weekend, then wants 10% of your income.

    1. Re:Jesus, the first Trump Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also his Dad ducked your wife raw-doggie and made you pay for it.

    2. Re:Jesus, the first Trump Republican by Oligonicella · · Score: 0

      Easy to play.

      Jesus the Democrat:
      Makes up stories, claims to NOT HAVE DONE THINGS, questions the meaning of "is", then wants 75% of your income.

  37. Offense culture leads to blasphemy culture by sinij · · Score: 1

    Offense culture inevitably leads to blasphemy culture and these are early signs of this phenomenon. If West ends up living in Theocracy, we can all thank SJWs for that.

    1. Re:Offense culture leads to blasphemy culture by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      Nope, you can't blame SJWs for absolutely everything you know. Religious people banning stuff existed well before modern organised "SJW" movements.

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
  38. Hi Son-man, I'm Dad-man! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Oh, the Christians might be upset about a trivialization of Jesus?
    I thought they were worried the Aztecs would be upset of the representation of Nanahuatzin in a comic book. Boy, you sure don't want to piss off those Aztecs!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Hi Son-man, I'm Dad-man! by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Oh, the Christians might be upset about a trivialization of Jesus?

      They don't seem to mind wasting their money at Christmas time. Heaven forbid we should forget the day Jesus was born, pass me another present so I can celebrate the religion of Commercialisation!

  39. That's the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about instead of distorting or conflating religion, you teach the truth. Truth about the sinful nature of man, truth that God loves His creation and wanted to save man from the destruction of sin, truth of how this story is about love because God is love. Oh yeah, because no one on DC knows anything about the greatest story and instead thinks theirs is the greatest story and God needs help somehow.

    1. Re:That's the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the truth that the Bible is nothing more than a collection of stories that was assembled by some classy editors around 1200 AD, in essence being nothing more than a medieval comic book. Why do people arc up over such nonsense?

  40. Theocracy by johnstrass1 · · Score: 1

    And who says we don't live in a theocracy...

  41. Controversy as Marketing by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    They ditched when they saw it wasn't going to do well; otherwise, they'd pull crap like killing Superman just to sell some more tired old crap.

    Hey, isn't Superman a SUN powered god? Didn't superman become a Jesus proxy? They didn't have the guts to use superman; it had to have crossed their mind.

    As stupid as it sounds it could have been funny to see a make over Jesus in spandex and a cape multiplying food and being a preachy un-dead immortal trying to appeal to little boys -- who tend to resolve their emotions physically... in a comic book character fashion.

    I sure hope somebody at South Park catches wind of this story! This could turn out so much better...

    1. Re:Controversy as Marketing by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Well, the sun-powered superhero is obviously a proxy for Superman, however, the people writing the story aren't DC employees and DC wouldn't want to expose a lucrative property like Superman to the potential ridicule that the story could trigger up if it wasn't done well. Also, I get the feeling that the sun-powered superhero is likely to have some un-superman traits, because Superman is a bit too good to contrast well with the direction they are most likely to take with Jesus.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  42. So much for "Free Speech" by The+Faywood+Assassin · · Score: 1

    Aren't the people getting bent out of shape about this the same people who go on and on about "free speech" when they have to demonize other religions?

    --

    "I'm a humble person really,

    I'm actually much greater than I think I am"

  43. Silly fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christians are basically super butthurt fanbois who freak out any time someone challenges (or tries to extend) their cannon. It's a shame DC cancelled their run to appeal to these idiots.

  44. Re:Special fun-pak games section planned too by houghi · · Score: 1

    That would be on the first few weeks. Later it would be a "fold here" like they used to have in Mad Magazine a gazillion years ago. (80-ies?)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  45. Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty much the only religion unarguably less forgiving than Christianity is Islam.

    Clearly you've never offended a Scientologist.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me again who the Scientologists have suicide bombed and issued fatwas against

    2. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Maybe the guy hanging out with Sun-Man should be Tom Cruise.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by mark_reh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've mistaken scientology for a religion.

    4. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they meant the "Jesus" of the LDS, not the real one. Most likely however is that Mark Russell and Richard Pace are atheistic jews on a mission to further polarize and weaken society. DC's "true agenda" seems to be coming out.
      wordbuzzscratchypicturething: diaper

    5. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      I think he was comparing Christians to Scientologists in terms of forgiving. Rewrite it as "pretty much the only religions unarguably less forgiving than Christianity are Islam and Scientology."

    6. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 2

      You've mistaken scientology for a religion.

      Why? Scientology has all the hallmarks as any other religion does. And it is just as valid as the rest of them too.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    7. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My level 9 access to the Caribbean Scientologist cruiser ensures that I believe in getting to meet Hollywood celebrities.

    8. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Charlatan that founded it is dead. So yes, religion not cult.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the only religion unarguably less forgiving than Christianity is Islam.

      Clearly you've never offended a Scientologist.

      You think you're funny, but you're not. Do Scientologists literally behead you? Or did I miss that particular Tom Cruise scene on the TV nightly news?

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    10. Re:Remove Jesus, insert L Ron Hubbard by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Scientology is a religion when it is legally convenient to be a religion, and a business when it is legally convenient to be a business.

  46. Yes how dare they by DrXym · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How dare they concoct a ridiculous fictional character and use it like this? I'm outraged. Also, the other character Sun-Man deserves a better story line.

  47. Speaking of which... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, you've fallen into the age old trap of believing that a deity/messiah would behave the way you want. I have a sneaky suspicion that the any returned Jesus would decry the SJWs as much as the political machinations of the church/political parties and the rest of the divisive ideologies.

    Speaking of which, it's you that has fallen into that trap. "Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I have come to divide people against each other!" - Luke 12:51

  48. Re:The definition of a bully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe the comic author is Christian and is just writing/drawing what they know? Also, most Muslims would not want to kill the author for this (and would claim those who do want to are bad Muslims), and that there are some Christians who would also want to kill the author.

  49. What a feat of reality distortion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is literally Christians acting like Muslim fundamentalists... and you're still trying to make it look like you/we are so much better.

    Just have a bit of patience. They'll probably "progress" from holy wars to child rape quicker than we Christians did.

    1. Re:What a feat of reality distortion! by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      This is literally Christians acting like Muslim fundamentalists...

      Wait, did the studio receive multiple credible death threats after announcing it?

    2. Re:What a feat of reality distortion! by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Probably, but those death threats were from good American Christians and thus probably not news worthy. Or were you under the impression that there aren't any religious nut jobs in the ranks of the Christian Fundamentalists.

      Seriously, the publication was cancelled not because they received death threats, but because the Christian group promised to bring the death threats by making them a target. It was most definitely cancelled because they were afraid of violence from Christian nut jobs, not because they feared this group of people would continue not buying the comics that DC publishes, they even said as much near the end of the article.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  50. "He was like us in all things but sin" by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    At least, that's what they told me in religion class.
    Thus, those who call it blasphemy to show the Son of God taking a lesson from someone his Father created have told us that God wouldn't do that.
    Like us in all things but sin; unlike us in $act; therefore $act is sinful.

    I see their unspoken position--taking a lesson from you means I'm less than you; to show God as "less than" would be blasphemy.
    For them, hubris is a virtue (they call it being "righteous")

    In this case I can't fault them for hypocrisy; they are self-consistent here.
    I dispute their fundamental premise--that letting someone teach you something makes you "less than".

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  51. Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone made a Mohammed comic, and then couldn't understand why their office was cleansed with an AK-47.

  52. Fundie Follies by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

    I think the religious fundamentalists and critics who are trying to stop Second Coming aren't interested in protecting Christ so much as their ability to control his narrative... They probably (correctly) suspect that it's not Christ who's being parodied, but themselves and how they've twisted his teachings of mercy for the powerless into a self-serving tool of the powerful. - Comic's Author Mark Russell

    breath of fresh air that.

    - js.

  53. This will be your opportunity to serve as witneses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

    Mystery Red of the Great American Eclipse
    It has blood on it!
    ABCNews: Eclipse makes pendulum wander
    Sound of Silence

  54. Um... Preacher? by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever you do, don't show these petitioners a copy of Preacher. Their heads would explode.

    On second thought, do. Do show them copies.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  55. Re:Special fun-pak games section planned too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (80-ies?)

    So, eighty-ies? I think you meant the 80s, or perhaps the eighties.

  56. What about Islam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine if this guy wrote about Mohammed.

  57. Casting the first stone, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the folks who petitioned against this were thrilled to have something else to deflect away attention from their own blasphemies and sins.

  58. i was expecting an atheist uproar. by Voice+of+satan · · Score: 1

    When reading the title i was expecting non religious people to be miffed by the intrusion of religious fanfiction in their stuff. Well, it was the other way around. But i know next to nothing to seperheroes and the public interested in them.

    Isn't all sort of advert a good advert ? Coudln't they sell the comic surfing over a wave of comical christfags whining ? For the fun of it ?

  59. Second Coming by PPH · · Score: 1

    So, he was here before?

    Oy vey!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  60. Incentive by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    If we don't extend permanent copyright protection to the bible and derived works, then its authors will retroactively lose all their incentive to have created the work.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  61. Makes Perfect Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun-Man is clearly a reference to a sun worship cult very popular among Roman soldiers of the time. They had almost identical rituals to those of early church and considered vine as blood as well. The early church took offense due to this similarity and considered Mithraism as worship of Satan. This similarity is considered to have made it easier for the Roman military to organically convert to early Christianity. The comic is probably a commentary of these curious events and facts.

  62. Re:Yeah, Jesus needs to learn from Sun-Man. Riiiig by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Hey there Mr. 666, as an aside, did you know there was a Son of Satan comic? Marvel ran it in the mid-seventies.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  63. What is really happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This new Vertigo lineup has been a mockery of what the old Vertigo series were. In the past, they had people who were pros with a history and skill. The new lineup is being written by a bunch of SJW political hacks that literally don't care if the series fail or not. Zoe Quinn, really? There are no editors actually working on it. The plots of these new series are god awful extremist political garbage. I can't really stress how messed up all of this is. I don't know what they were thinking when they approved this relaunch. This isn't Vertigo. Ironically, the Jesus parody was the only one that didn't look like complete trash. If you don't believe me, download the comics and read them. I guess they feel a need to compete with Marvel in the SJW demographic and that was a complete disaster of Marvel Comics.

  64. Heh, just saw a comment up above by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    In the comic version, Thor is the hammer. Jesus is the nail.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  65. Buddha by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    perhaps they could do a one pager where Sun-Man says 'look I am more popular than you', and Buddha replies 'Is that so?', smiles, and goes back to Nirvana.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  66. Jesus is the third rail of popular culture by mccrew · · Score: 1

    Jesus is the third rail of popular culture - you touch it and you die - as John Lennon famously discovered.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  67. The Youtube Skeptic community made a good point by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I say the community because the point keeps coming up: Christianity is just farther along than Islam.

    The Bible really only has 1 punishment: Death. And several of the Commandments folks like to ignore make it so that images of God are a huge no-no. Historically the reason for this was to keep power concentrated with the priesthood (folks who know their history know that government & religion were often the same thing for a very long time).

    This comes up when folks ask a YouTube skeptic "why so many videos on Christianity when Islam will kill you for drawing their prophet?". The answer is Christianity has a more immediate impact on their lives because of the countries they live in, and that they're more afraid of their country regressing back to the point where Christians have the same power to forcefully enact their will as many Muslims wield.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  68. Who do you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delicate conservatives who can't handle being offended.

  69. It sounds interesting by fredrated · · Score: 1

    until zealots burn your house down.

  70. Been done, back in the sixties by whitroth · · Score: 2

    https://comixjoint.com/jesusco...

    "If you liked the New Testament, you'll love this new, improved testament"

    Alternatively: Even the grave couldn't stop him - he's coming after you and he WANTS YOUR SOUL!

  71. SJWs ruining comics again by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    The SJWs (Super Jesus Warriors) strike again.

  72. Is marketing dead??? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I can't believe they canceled a comic with such marketing potential.

    If I were in charge of DC I would not only have NOT canceled this comic, I would have made a special edition cover with sun-man in gold foil, Jesus in silver foil, and in big letters proclaimed it to be the "Blasphemous Solarity Edition". Probably only 500k run at first just to be a bit safe, charging $20 a pop. You'd sell 100k copies just to the people who wanted to burn a copy on YouTube alone!

    In fact that brings to mind ANOTHER brilliant idea, an even more limited edition that contained strontium nitrate particles embedded in the cover that would cause the whole thing to burn with a brilliant red flame! Those would go for $50 and would look AMAZING being burnt in disgust on YouTube, and you could save on production costs by not even printing the insides.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Is marketing dead??? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could just store it in a freezer, so as to keep it cold so it doesn't hurt precious religious snowflakes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is marketing dead??? by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      If they think THAT version of the "Second Coming" was blasphemous, it's lucky the Christ addicts don't know what I would do with the title.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  73. The world has regressed. Sad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've come full circle almost. Rest assured by now the catholic church is already thinking about the next inquisition and recruiting candidates. We also might see a new wave of witch hunting if we continue on this totally absurd path.

  74. Was this supposed to be a pun? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    The characters are "Sun-Man" and "The Son of Man" *facepalm*

    1. Re:Was this supposed to be a pun? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      That pun is the true reason the comic was canceled.

  75. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sound more thought provoking than the Bible.

  76. No, just continent-wide mass murder, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    torture, witch burning, rape, and the lot.

    You can stop acting like you did not get that I meant Christianity 500 years ago being exactly like Islam today, and Islam getting there too some day.
    (Frankly, Islam would first have to get even worst to match wath Christianity did back then.)

    I'm sane (what you call "atheism", but without a concept of "belief" at all,and instead basing my views on experienced reality) by the way.

    1. Re:No, just continent-wide mass murder, by Shotgun · · Score: 0

      Since you are so into reality and all, please consider that there were CHRISTIANS that put a stop to all those things that bothered you.

      And where in the Christian holy text does it say that a believer should lie to a non-believer?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  77. Mohammad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What no Muhammad?

  78. Re: Finally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A hero we COULD believe in.

  79. Re: Satanic Child Sex Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then the Catholic Church would sue for portraying them as Satanic child sex predators who run the darkweb for childporn. Truth.. but speak truth and suffer!

  80. Re: Cry Moar Chuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one likes your stupid Chix tracts. Eat a cock you whiney faggit.

  81. History repeats itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last time a DC writer wanted to use Jesus resulted in the creator quitting.

    https://ohdannyboy.blogspot.com/2011/10/morning-of-magician-swamp-thing-meets.html

  82. From kikes, for kikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nail him to the cross again assholes

  83. It's not about faith by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's about _control_. You want to be the exclusive source for comment and truth about your God so that folks have to get to God through _you_. Then you can charge them for the privilege.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's not about faith by strikethree · · Score: 1

      it's about _control_. You want to be the exclusive source for comment and truth about your God so that folks have to get to God through _you_. Then you can charge them for the privilege.

      You called this one correctly. (credit where credit is due)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  84. Re:The definition of a bully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most Muslims would not want to kill the author for this

    Probably correct.

    (and would claim those who do want to are bad Muslims)

    Absolutely incorrect.

  85. The US NEEDS to stop catering to religous nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want ISIS or their brothers fundie christians(with whom they share near identical social values) near my comics or politics.

  86. you had me at blasphemous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hooray blasphemy!

  87. Replace Jesus with Mohamed and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then see if theyâ(TM)ll publish that.

    That being said, as Jesus is big on the prophet list in the Quran, I am continually surprised that someone from Islam hasnâ(TM)t gone jihadist on folk that mock Jesus.

  88. How about RELIGINIGFAG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A comic about a religious n1gg3r faggot who fucks stupid white people in the ass.

  89. The original story... by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    https://www.blueletterbible.or... John 1:1 KJV - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. ...is still better than anything written by mankind, before or since.

    If any of you would be interested in a good overall introduction to the Bible, I can't recommend Dr. Chuck Missler's work highly enough for "nerds"--> https://www.youtube.com/playli...
    He comes from an Information Technology background, and presents some insight into the authenticity of the Bible that I had not seen in my 35+ years of study. He doesn't "preach", he just teaches according to what he has found over many decades of Bible study. Could be the best 24 hours you'll ever invest in anything in your life....

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  90. Not a great comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of aspects to comics. Concept, story, art, characters, history, regularity, etc.

    While the concept might have been interesting, the actual story was less so, and the artwork was bleh. None of the characters had an active history and following in the comics, so there is a big hurdle to acceptance. Individual comics nowadays cost like half a regular movie ticket price or more and comics devotees are already shelling out for comics with concepts, stories, artist and writers they already know and love with a long history of delivering on a regular basis.

    Publishers cast new comics out all the time. Few make it. Sometimes a creator had a personal interest and will keep injecting characters in mainline comics hoping they will catch on. Sometimes they do, often they don't. Just like the movies. From some of the early Marvel outings you might not expect the current billion dollar blockbusters were going to happen, but they did. If they knew the right formula for a real hit, we wouldn't see quite so much dreck.

    But at least they keep trying and we love them for that.

  91. How do you know he can't fly? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Have you seen him? A stiff wind and he's be airborne in a minute flat.

    And if getting America to talk seriously about single payer healthcare in 2019 isn't a super power I don't know what is.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:How do you know he can't fly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stiff wind and he's be airborne in a minute flat.

      I think you have him confused with Trump's... whatever it is on Trump's head

      And if getting America to talk seriously about single payer healthcare in 2019 isn't a super power I don't know what is.

      Pushing narratives and exploiting populism are not super powers. Trump can it too, and actually does it better since after all he won the election. If you want to talk super hero traits, Trump's got it covered

      -he's inherited wealth and playboy reputation like Batman
      -he's been in many movies, like many super heroes got film adaptations
      -Trump's worldview is pretty much out of gold and silver age comcis: 'merica good, commies and socialists bad; very little care for nuance
      -he makes up names for other people that could fit into a comic book: Crooked Hillary, Low Energy Jeb, Lying Ted, Little Rubio, Bad Hombre (this one totally could be the name of a super villain), CHINA (you have to pronounce it in Trump's unique way), Little Rocket man, etc

  92. What's next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A comic where they draw the prophet and market it to Iran and UAE?

  93. DC's had the Christian God in it for ages by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    go look up Specter. The don't call him "God", he's The Presence. So this is hardly a stretch.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/