If sex is the only outcome that matter, then better advice would be to just go pay a prostitute for some. It also gets rid of any obligation to good or talented at sex - they'll tell you exactly what you want to hear.
You can do the same thing using just fingertips. Simply touch two fingers simultaneously and gradually increase the distance between them until the subject reports that they can feel two fingers, instead of one.
Doing this on someone's back will give a distance of probably 10cm or so.
(Well, I would guess, they sell the seasons 5 to 10 still for broadcast in other countries, but six years delay is IMHO too much.)
That's exactly the reason. They still need to sell the show for broadcast in other countries, but these won't be bought for as high as price if the residents of that country are able to buy the show on DVD.
Some atheists forget that can never possible to prove the null hypothesis (that there is no god), only that the null hypothesis is false (god exists). So only in the absence of such proof, do we accept that the null hypothesis is true.
Highlander II, what a joke! After finally being forced to watch Highlander I, I immediately questioned the possible existence of any sequels. And not just because the first one wasn't particularly good.
climateprediction.net are doing a really good job of modelling climate change, and are getting lots more data all the time (due to their distributed computing project). Check out the Results and Climate Science sections (although I couldn't find anything about adherence to historical temperature changes in the 5 minutes I spent flicking through).
Your example shows how quickly nature can recover from damage, given the chance. Laws were passed when (clearly) there was more to know about ecosystem recovery. They didn't wait until they could accurately forecast the 20 year recovery time, so why does that point to delaying making laws to regulate Climate Change and CO2 emissions?
Surely he'd have to post before the person he's referring to in order to do that?
Re:Article is HORSE TURDS. About as bad as DIGG no
on
Kids Say Email is Dead
·
· Score: 1
Pardon me for being suspicious (and not that it matters), but it look like you set up your own joke with an AC post so you could Karma whore. If so, it worked!
er, you are still faster than you ex-companions...
Why not post a link so that others don't have to do as much/any tracking themselves :).
If sex is the only outcome that matter, then better advice would be to just go pay a prostitute for some. It also gets rid of any obligation to good or talented at sex - they'll tell you exactly what you want to hear.
I like how you bash two other websites, but don't even have the balls to tell us which elistist video game forum you're a member of.
You can do the same thing using just fingertips. Simply touch two fingers simultaneously and gradually increase the distance between them until the subject reports that they can feel two fingers, instead of one.
Doing this on someone's back will give a distance of probably 10cm or so.
Actually, I think he was making his own joke: that he calls them the [name absolutely no one calls them].
Wait, too soon...
I can't believe I wasted my mod points earlier.. :(.
..and welcome to /.
Informative Link (viewer discretion advised)
Millhouse said that, not Homer.
Mosh clockwise? I seem to have gone mostly anti-clockwise in my circle-pits.. Then again, most people I've met in a moshpit are fucking morons.
Some atheists forget that can never possible to prove the null hypothesis (that there is no god), only that the null hypothesis is false (god exists). So only in the absence of such proof, do we accept that the null hypothesis is true.
But as he said, mitochondrial genes moved to the nucleus. That would be DNA of bacterial origin then...
Really? I hated it.
Highlander II, what a joke! After finally being forced to watch Highlander I, I immediately questioned the possible existence of any sequels. And not just because the first one wasn't particularly good.
I'm surprised a Trekker with mod points hasn't modded you 'Troll' yet. He never actually said those words!
Drunk, and it's not even tea-time yet [here]. Good work! :)
climateprediction.net are doing a really good job of modelling climate change, and are getting lots more data all the time (due to their distributed computing project). Check out the Results and Climate Science sections (although I couldn't find anything about adherence to historical temperature changes in the 5 minutes I spent flicking through).
The BBC ran a programme in January using some of their data.
Your example shows how quickly nature can recover from damage, given the chance. Laws were passed when (clearly) there was more to know about ecosystem recovery. They didn't wait until they could accurately forecast the 20 year recovery time, so why does that point to delaying making laws to regulate Climate Change and CO2 emissions?
Damn, used up all my mod points earlier.
Surely he'd have to post before the person he's referring to in order to do that?
Pardon me for being suspicious (and not that it matters), but it look like you set up your own joke with an AC post so you could Karma whore. If so, it worked!
You need to use your email address as your login for myspace. So they are lying to you.