Are you assuming an isotropic inertial frame of reference?
If you could use Bell's theorem to communicate, you could use 2 different inertial frames of reference to receive data before you sent it.
Not to mention that he and his buddy, Buffet, both own sizeable portions of railroad companies that profit handsomely from moving Canadian oil sands bitumen.
David Brooks is the New York Times' impression of a nominally conservative editorialist. They only have him on so the listeners can hear him foam at the mouth about how much he hates Trump. I have yet to hear him assert any opinions that are conservative. At best he is a centrist elitist.
NPR does balanced much like Fox News does balanced: the counter argument is always weak.
What makes AGW, AKA Climate Change less believable is all the BS non-causal effects attributed to it by politicians and the media.
Refugees can blame the weather all they want, but money and lifestyle are their true motivations.
Why, because Lucas stinks as a director. The acting on episodes 1-3 and 6 is HORRIBLE. They all sound like they are reading cue cards. It's downright unwatchable for any objective, non-fanboi viewer.
None of these folks are worried about re-election right now, so they will likely be voting purely on self-interest rather than the interests of their constituency.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you assuming an isotropic inertial frame of reference? If you could use Bell's theorem to communicate, you could use 2 different inertial frames of reference to receive data before you sent it.
I hear No Agenda is the best podcast in the universe.
Not to mention that he and his buddy, Buffet, both own sizeable portions of railroad companies that profit handsomely from moving Canadian oil sands bitumen.
You bankrupt a company by not buying its products. I don't see that happening any time soon in spite of all the wishful thinking.
I'm all for divestiture. It makes my dividends much larger.
If they had published a study showing that Facebook causes insomnia they would risk getting sued.
David Brooks is the New York Times' impression of a nominally conservative editorialist. They only have him on so the listeners can hear him foam at the mouth about how much he hates Trump. I have yet to hear him assert any opinions that are conservative. At best he is a centrist elitist. NPR does balanced much like Fox News does balanced: the counter argument is always weak.
Florida's voter rolls were uhhhh Hacked! http://flvoters.com/by_name/in...
With so many typos, I wonder if Slashdot has been hacked.
99% of all global warming experts agree that global warming exists. How many UFO experts agree that UFOs exist?
Prestigious investment banks don't get fined $5 billion for ripping off their customers.
Stop hiring ESL posters. Their writing style is difficult to understand.
Television is a medium, so called because it is neither rare nor well-done. -Ernie Kovacs
"They were flying to Los Angeles on a trip to visit Disneyworld." That sounds suspicious right there. Disney World is in Orlando.
What makes AGW, AKA Climate Change less believable is all the BS non-causal effects attributed to it by politicians and the media. Refugees can blame the weather all they want, but money and lifestyle are their true motivations.
That's funny. I'd put in $5 to your kickstarter.
Yeah, man. Don't forget General Motors. They don't want EM to see the light of day either.
The heat won't matter because the whole place will be under water from the melting glaciers of Greenland.
127.0.0.1 microsoft.com
Will this operating system be completely free of daemons?
Why, because Lucas stinks as a director. The acting on episodes 1-3 and 6 is HORRIBLE. They all sound like they are reading cue cards. It's downright unwatchable for any objective, non-fanboi viewer.
Smart country folks live East of their work location.
Does Russia pay people to troll online forums to push party propaganda on unwitting users? That would be despicable.
What climate mess? Trying to blot out the sun would definitely cause a climate mess to fix a climate mess that is still largely theoretical.
None of these folks are worried about re-election right now, so they will likely be voting purely on self-interest rather than the interests of their constituency.