I am not that familiar with American politics but the skeptic in me says that the Republican party tolerates Ron Paul only because they believe he has no chance in hell.
But sure, vote for him in the primaries but if he does not get the nomination, vote a 3rd party.
So in a loser pays system, what happens if you're on the wrong end of a lawsuit from one of those $500/hr lawyer teams and you can only pony up for a $150/hour lawyer and you lose?
The judge decides the amount you're liable for according to the individual circumstances of the case and the parties involved.
Correct. But that doesn't matter. They can still issue a warrant to question him. Their legal system, and it's up to the UK if what they want to agree to extradite for it. Since that's in the treaties they have there's not a lot of room for manouvre here.
Is it spelled out in the extradition treaty that people not charged with a crime (therefore: not accused) are to be extradited? I would be very much surprised if that's the case so, regrettably, I must go [citation needed] on you.
So much for the bad guys using it. The good guys can use it to bypass any DRM scheme. A little magic box plugs in, and watches memory as the decrypted file appears and is rendered. All that HDCP stuff is irrelevant, bypassed. Or, on the fly, keys are sniffed out.
If that was so easy, the "good guys" would have already have "regular" PCIe cards that can "bypass any DRM scheme", including "all that HDCP stuff". Where can I get one?
Canada can afford to do all this with a piss-poor military. With a population of just over 30 million, Canada's military is so small that it's barely adequate to protect one quarter of their territory.
The majority Conservatives already dropped all of these provisions from C-11 as they're highly unpopular. Recent polls are now in the news showing that the New Democrats are tied with them, and may even be slightly leading. I really doubt they will back this and risk the next election over it.
Please cite your sources.
All the sources that I can find claim that C-11 is completely unchanged from its first introduction as Harper's Conservatives blocked *all* of the proposed amendments.
He merely observes that if those eyes were "designed", then the designer did a shoddy job. Especially since the eyes of the cephalopodes were already available for reference (according to both the evolutionary timeline estimates and the Genesis creation story).
You, on the other hand, tried to change the topic, re-frame the argument, introduce strawmen and conduct ad-hominem attacks. Kindly bugger off.
Design patterns served the purpose of giving names to the things that as you said, most coders already came up with. When I say strategy, or observer, or behavior, or singleton.. everyone knows what the hell I'm talking about.
When I was young(er), we had just one name for almost all of the design patterns: "another level of indirection".
Slashdot Mirror
Jeri Ellsworth is a MUCH better example of a sexy female scientist. She invented the Commodore 64 emulator within a joystick, a popular toy that sold well on QVC and at Walmart.
Which makes her an engineer, not a scientist.
The problem is Theism and Atheism are both based on ignorance (a belief or lack of belief, not Truth nor facts.)
An absence of belief in god(s) is not the same as a belief in their absence.
Just simplify it: Terran. We both originated there, and are still there.
Are you sure?
You start with a full frontal lobotomy...
Farscape first?
and last.
Specifically, Ron Paul.
I am not that familiar with American politics but the skeptic in me says that the Republican party tolerates Ron Paul only because they believe he has no chance in hell.
But sure, vote for him in the primaries but if he does not get the nomination, vote a 3rd party.
Has the US formally declared war on Iran?
I wonder if that Nobel Peace Prize burns in his hand yet.
Why should it? He's in good company.
The U.S. doesn't respect all U.N. resolutions, only the ones we like at a particular moment in time.
The U.S. also doesn't respect WTO resolutions unless they go in their favor.
Come to think of it, they don't respect any international body.
They do respect force though, so it may pay off to be a Chinese national.
I am sick of footing the bill for anything they can think of.
If enough people get over themselves and actually vote for parties that support this, it will send a loud enough message to facilitate a change.
So in a loser pays system, what happens if you're on the wrong end of a lawsuit from one of those $500/hr lawyer teams and you can only pony up for a $150/hour lawyer and you lose?
The judge decides the amount you're liable for according to the individual circumstances of the case and the parties involved.
Any recommendations for a good VPN provider then?
Ethiopia, Schmethiopia...
What do you do when *your* government treads all over *your* rights in the name of "national security"?
Correct. But that doesn't matter. They can still issue a warrant to question him. Their legal system, and it's up to the UK if what they want to agree to extradite for it. Since that's in the treaties they have there's not a lot of room for manouvre here.
Is it spelled out in the extradition treaty that people not charged with a crime (therefore: not accused) are to be extradited?
I would be very much surprised if that's the case so, regrettably, I must go [citation needed] on you.
Would the alleged crime be illegal in the UK? Yes.
Is he charged with a crime?
I was under the impression that he's only wanted for questioning.
So much for the bad guys using it. The good guys can use it to bypass any DRM scheme. A little magic box plugs in, and watches memory as the decrypted file appears and is rendered. All that HDCP stuff is irrelevant, bypassed. Or, on the fly, keys are sniffed out.
If that was so easy, the "good guys" would have already have "regular" PCIe cards that can "bypass any DRM scheme", including "all that HDCP stuff".
Where can I get one?
Then computers in the prisons should be a good rehab route?
Yes, that's why they will be opposed.
In the land of for-profit prisons, the last thing you want is rehabilitation.
Canada can afford to do all this with a piss-poor military. With a population of just over 30 million, Canada's military is so small that it's barely adequate to protect one quarter of their territory.
Against what?
The majority Conservatives already dropped all of these provisions from C-11 as they're highly unpopular. Recent polls are now in the news showing that the New Democrats are tied with them, and may even be slightly leading. I really doubt they will back this and risk the next election over it.
Please cite your sources.
All the sources that I can find claim that C-11 is completely unchanged from its first introduction as Harper's Conservatives blocked *all* of the proposed amendments.
Some light reading:
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/tags/c-11
So what extensions are needed to make it work like users actually want it to work?
Most creationists on this planet are Hindu or Muslim
Interestingly, there was a time when those groups were at the forefront of scientific progress.
You hate your flawed eyes.
No, he doesn't.
He merely observes that if those eyes were "designed", then the designer did a shoddy job.
Especially since the eyes of the cephalopodes were already available for reference (according to both the evolutionary timeline estimates and the Genesis creation story).
You, on the other hand, tried to change the topic, re-frame the argument, introduce strawmen and conduct ad-hominem attacks.
Kindly bugger off.
Design patterns served the purpose of giving names to the things that as you said, most coders already came up with. When I say strategy, or observer, or behavior, or singleton .. everyone knows what the hell I'm talking about.
When I was young(er), we had just one name for almost all of the design patterns: "another level of indirection".
another example why i'm proud to leave in EU :)
Should I be ashamed of being a Canadian?
Are there GPS units that use OpenStreetMaps data?