>And if you had half-a-clue about mobile >technologies, you would know that J2ME is just a >middlet engine sitting on top of a real >operating system.
You're not me, and I believe I have more clue than you do - if you had half-a-clue about any technologies in the 90's at all, or at least some reading skills, you could have told the difference between a "platform" and an "operating system".
J2ME is a "real" platform - as "real" as your definition of a "real" operating system - that ideally runs on an OS that is optimized for the Java VM and usually runs no other application.
If Psion 7700 will have the J2ME integrated, good for it. If the "real OS" has to run older apps to be backwards compatible - suck to be it - the J2ME on it may suck but it's not Java's fault.
When people uninstall the free stuffs that it comes with (e.g. Kaaza), it's still a spyware.
How about, from now on, whenever we say "spyware", say "spyware and adware". By putting them together whenever we want to use one of the words, we don't have to care what Gator wants itself to be called.
This technique is called "Guilt by association".;)
You know what? When you buy the licensed version, I bet you can just reopen the file you have saved.
As far as I know the watermark is dynamically created everytime you render, NOT in the Maya scene description files themselves - otherwise you can edit them away easily, because it's format is so well understood.
>I can't believe that much code has been written by >that many, often just-graduated, programmers >without someone somewhere saying "to hell with it, >who'll ever know?". I mean, this is humans we're >talking about. I think you're asking too much for >it not to have happened. And that's disregarding >the fact that MS has been caught in the past >copying closed source code.
Read the original post again. It said "Chance of a large enough project not to include some open source code is 0", it sounded like BS to me.
Slashdot Mirror
>And if you had half-a-clue about mobile
>technologies, you would know that J2ME is just a
>middlet engine sitting on top of a real
>operating system.
You're not me, and I believe I have more clue than you do - if you had half-a-clue about any technologies in the 90's at all, or at least some reading skills, you could have told the difference between a "platform" and an "operating system".
J2ME is a "real" platform - as "real" as your definition of a "real" operating system - that ideally runs on an OS that is optimized for the Java VM and usually runs no other application.
If Psion 7700 will have the J2ME integrated, good for it. If the "real OS" has to run older apps to be backwards compatible - suck to be it - the J2ME on it may suck but it's not Java's fault.
I still believe J2ME is a better mobile platform than Symbian...
ATI nVidia
speed 10 9
price 5 5
heat 9 1
noise 9 2
features 10 9
TOTAL 43 26
Choose ATI.
Sexual reproduction evolves species that fights microorganisms (i.e. pathogens) better.
It has been verified by experiments and is a widely-accepted theory.
>1) Their mother. (Who else nurtured them and
>prepard them for greatness?)
Hm...you seem to conveniently forget that whoever has a mother also has a father.
Children nurtured by 2 parents generally do better than those with one parent.
>2) Their wife. (Who else encouraged them and
>supported them?)
I guess I live in a world where great husbands do exist in abundance.
I believe it also has something to do with the heat associated with electronic processors which should not exist at all on an optical.
>but no one has seen the true capabilities of flash
>yet
Fear the power of Flash!!
http://www.deanliou.com/WinRG/WinRG.htm
>I wonder if SCO will just drop the suit once all
>the exec have finished dumping their stock.
SCO cannot just drop the suit and leave a mess behind. The moment it drops the suit, I bet thousands of Linux contributors will bring up new suits.
>I would require that the ability to export data
>into an open format be included.
It is not enough.
It should save data to an open format by DEFAULT.
And if you choose an alternative format, it should not pop up an annoying dialog every time.
When people uninstall the free stuffs that it comes with (e.g. Kaaza), it's still a spyware.
;)
How about, from now on, whenever we say "spyware", say "spyware and adware". By putting them together whenever we want to use one of the words, we don't have to care what Gator wants itself to be called.
This technique is called "Guilt by association".
Computers have a unique way of "resurrection" called a "backup".
In a lot of applications horizontal scaling is much more important than vertical scaling.
I cannot believe an article that talks about scalability simply just "ignores" horizontal scaling.
Okay, some idiot modded my non-information up. Mods please bring it back down. Thanks.
In this case, surfing one predefined random URL every 10 seconds will eliminate the collateral damage.
You know what? When you buy the licensed version, I bet you can just reopen the file you have saved.
As far as I know the watermark is dynamically created everytime you render, NOT in the Maya scene description files themselves - otherwise you can edit them away easily, because it's format is so well understood.
So your concern is a non-concern.
Since we *LOVE* their service, let's eagerly flock to SiteFinder by surfing a random URL every millisecond!!
I'm ready to run a background wget that surfs a random URL 10 times a second.
Please join me.
Abalone...
And I always think the ability of admitting weaknesses is something that a good PHB should possess.
Guess I have to think again.
When I was a user of IE, I had this problem before (Now I'm on Linux :)
I simply used SoftICE to get rid of this dialog box. (usual disassemble, trace, patch)
If you don't have SoftICE, I imagine that W32dasm or even Visual studio can accomplish this task, too.
FYI, getting around region code is still legal, despite DMCA.
>I can't believe that much code has been written by
>that many, often just-graduated, programmers
>without someone somewhere saying "to hell with it,
>who'll ever know?". I mean, this is humans we're
>talking about. I think you're asking too much for
>it not to have happened. And that's disregarding
>the fact that MS has been caught in the past
>copying closed source code.
Read the original post again. It said "Chance of a large enough project not to include some open source code is 0", it sounded like BS to me.
KARMA! For each spam you kill, you get 1 point.
/. crowd.
Should work extremely well with at least the
And remember, open source != [L]GPL.
In this case, there's no need to prevent against it.
As for the chance being zero, you're probably right if you include public domains and BSD-licensed code, which don't really legally matter.
If you're talking the chance of not including GPL code being zero, I believe you're on a lot of crack.
If he demands royalty for each keyboard made with the combination, he might be as rich as Michael Dell...
Now, if he demands royalty each time the combination is pressed, he should probably be richer than Bill Gate himself...