The Eris gets an almost instant satellite lock, even if gpsOne is not configured. However, the big providers all have gpsOne since they are required to provide E-911 information. Some of them, such as Verizon block your apps from accessing it though.
Yes they do, the phone reports GPS data to the gpsOne server that the provider operates. This data is mostly used by many applications and the E911 service.
He also did not end slavery (Congress did after the war), he did however suspend slavery in the south and promised that the south would get to keep slavery if they didn't try to secede from the union. Lincoln is also on record stating that he never intended to end slavery (he even owned slaves).
I seriously doubt we'll be seeing the iPhone on Verizon or Sprint in the near future, Verizon has the Incredible which just came out and Sprint is releasing the EVO/4G. Both of which are Android based phones and superior to iPhone in every way.
That's because you're getting cartridges that use water based ink, if you get pigment based ink cartridges (labeled 'archival quality') you will not have this problem. The pigment based stuff costs more but will last much longer and doesn't bleed when moistened.
There is no need for these cartridges to cost so much, once HP has done the R&D the cartridge design and ink formula need not change when a new printer comes out, and for the most part I bet they don't. No ink is worth $8000 a gallon.
But the Federal government has constitutional authority, AZ does not have authority to create immigration laws. This si why we can freely move from state to state and become residences of any state we choose to reside in.
And the papers please aspect is also a violation of civil liberties.
They aren't making immigration law, they are requiring their officers to arrest violators of existing law and turn them over to INS. As for your "papers please" comment, you already have to verify your identity when you are arrested or detained as part of an investigation. Why is it that you liberals always want to protect criminals, what is it you have against following the law?
The problem here is one of "qualified immunity." This basically means that as long as the officer was acting in good faith he cannot be prosecuted. Its a sad truth but the police are above the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity
Police can charge you with anything, that does not mean the charges will stick. Its also perfectly legal to record public servants during the course of their duties. I even bet the police have video and audio of the interaction from their dashcams. How much do you want to bet they don't have consent for those recordings?
Why should they have to fight this in the first place? Its not like the ISPs aren't getting paid for bandwidth, that is after all what their customers pay for.
Slashdot Mirror
That only applies to laser weapons, its perfectly legal to blind the enemy with microwave weapons.
The Eris gets an almost instant satellite lock, even if gpsOne is not configured. However, the big providers all have gpsOne since they are required to provide E-911 information. Some of them, such as Verizon block your apps from accessing it though.
And one of the things the phone company provides is the gpsOne data, see my above post.
Yes they do, the phone reports GPS data to the gpsOne server that the provider operates. This data is mostly used by many applications and the E911 service.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GpsOne
Hi, I'm a professional flatulator.
Which one are you, Terrance or Phillip? How's the weather in Canada?
He also did not end slavery (Congress did after the war), he did however suspend slavery in the south and promised that the south would get to keep slavery if they didn't try to secede from the union. Lincoln is also on record stating that he never intended to end slavery (he even owned slaves).
You're thinking of Habeas Corpus and Lincoln did suspend this right during the Civil War.
Is that the one with the paperless restroom stalls? Guess that's what the iPad is good for.
You can disable MotoBlur, just like you can disable SenseUI on HTC phones.
No, the logic is quite clear: any product that competes with Apple's ones is automatically removed.
Can you say "anti-trust"?
Obama?
That's what you call circle-talk, its meant to mislead you into agreeing with him.
I seriously doubt we'll be seeing the iPhone on Verizon or Sprint in the near future, Verizon has the Incredible which just came out and Sprint is releasing the EVO/4G. Both of which are Android based phones and superior to iPhone in every way.
That's because you're getting cartridges that use water based ink, if you get pigment based ink cartridges (labeled 'archival quality') you will not have this problem. The pigment based stuff costs more but will last much longer and doesn't bleed when moistened.
They are lying, they are trying to justify their lawsuits against third party ink vendors in an attempt to keep ink prices high.
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1649866/hp-names-dodgy-ink-vendor
http://news.cnet.com/Inkjet-refiller-lashes-out-at-HP-for-lawsuit/2100-1041_3-5647086.html
There is no need for these cartridges to cost so much, once HP has done the R&D the cartridge design and ink formula need not change when a new printer comes out, and for the most part I bet they don't. No ink is worth $8000 a gallon.
http://hothardware.com/News/8000-Per-Gallon-Printer-Ink--Lawsuit/
But the Federal government has constitutional authority, AZ does not have authority to create immigration laws. This si why we can freely move from state to state and become residences of any state we choose to reside in.
And the papers please aspect is also a violation of civil liberties.
They aren't making immigration law, they are requiring their officers to arrest violators of existing law and turn them over to INS. As for your "papers please" comment, you already have to verify your identity when you are arrested or detained as part of an investigation. Why is it that you liberals always want to protect criminals, what is it you have against following the law?
This law is work for word the same as a federal law that has been on the books forever.
The police do not have the authority to force you to disclose passwords. You see, here in the US we have these things called rights.
Now days you can update the BIOS from inside the OS.
The problem here is one of "qualified immunity." This basically means that as long as the officer was acting in good faith he cannot be prosecuted. Its a sad truth but the police are above the law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity
Doesn't matter, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when you are out in public. Same applies if the police are recording. There is case law that supports this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy
Police can charge you with anything, that does not mean the charges will stick. Its also perfectly legal to record public servants during the course of their duties. I even bet the police have video and audio of the interaction from their dashcams. How much do you want to bet they don't have consent for those recordings?
That law applies to recorded conversations when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Think telephone calls.
The recording doesn't matter if they take the device and destroy it.
Why should they have to fight this in the first place? Its not like the ISPs aren't getting paid for bandwidth, that is after all what their customers pay for.