phantonfive is not trolling. They always do recover.... but we do need to understand the mechanism that causes the bleaching. If it's human-induced, we need to curb that!
Climatologists are not mechanical engineers, they are PhD's. I agree, engineers are very careful about the details. However, PhD's don't have life-risk to consider. I fact, there is overt manipulation of the data upon which most (if not all) of the climate "conclusions" are based.
Further, engineers don't have the luxury of being influenced by confirmation biases or other cognitive issues.... because engineering data is wholly-objective and extremely repeatable. "climate science" is neither; the inductive processes they apply seem to lead down paths that would follow confirmation bias, repeatedly. I'm involved in science and a great mentor of mine once said that, "if you torture the data enough, it will tell you anything you want to hear...."
Thanks for throwing out ad hom attacks and red herrings. Now, back to the fact that Mark's data directly contradicts his own statements and conclusions. I'm sure that data is published in a peer-reviewed journal, too.... so let's talk about the issue I've raised.
Mark Serreze is a well-known person in the climate debate community. But the link above is to HIS OWN data which directly contradicts his statements in the NYT article. I'm not attacking him personally, but I have substantive conflict with the way he conveyed the veracity and conclusions about his own data.
Actually, the sea ice extent was LOWER in 2006, for NASA's own data. Further, this years ice extent is roughly equivalent to a couple years, over the past decade.
What's happening hear is that several thousand people whom rely on the climate change scam, for their paycheck, are ramping up the BS so they can remain on the gravy train....
Here's the graph of the MASIE data.... feel like a real scientist, review it for yourself!
https://realclimatescience.com...
We will agree to disagree. A carrier making it less expensive to carry traffic that doesn't have to traverse another carrier (ergo it reduces the carriers costs) is just capitalism, which is good. I will stipulate that it makes it _possibly_ _somewhat_ more expensive to consume off-carrier content, but that's only if you are a maniac-streamer. In which case, that's your problem.
A violation of the principle of net neutrality would be either Fios or Verizon nerfing a non-Verizon / non-Fios service. In this case, they are just making it cheaper to consume bandwidth that remains on their backbone.
Nerfing Netflix or prioritizing voice packets from another voice provider would be a violation of the net-neutral principles. Which they aren't doing.
Please stop calling simple algorithms AI. Algorithm != Artificial Intelligence.
Stop losing our language to the losers in the marketing department.
Respectfully,
Huge Dilbert Fan
Wrong, they generally find rioting idiots to put down. By the way, the people you have to worry about, are not the people in uniforms. Generally, it's the dirt bags with no morals or ethics... aka the rioters in Furgeson.
When's the last time you saw a bunch of white people rioting and destroying their own neighborhoods.... tick tock tick tock tick tock..... NHHHHHHHHH never.
You're a complete retard and have not studied the History of Nazi Germany. The citizens where systematically disarmed, so that they could pose no credible threat to the Reich. The ONLY time that citizens were armed was during the pinch on Berlin, at which time anyone who could carry a Panzerfaust or rifle was pressed into service (at gunpoint) to serve until death or victory. Go crawl under your rock, liberal loser.
Ticket revenue probably goes to maintaining those monstrous stadiums and huge salaries. If you take away their ability to control WHO sees the content and WHEN they see it, they couldn't rape fans for $100-$2000 per ticket. If there is only one local source to view the LIVE content (read: go to the game), the NBA can continue to charge OBSCENE fees for the tickets and morons will continue to pay those fees for the privileged of viewing the LIVE content.
.
Personally, I am a free market person. If fans weren't so rabidly willing to pay the OBSCENE ticket prices, the market would correct downward. However, it would seem that the market is willing to support these OBSCENE ticket prices, so game on!!
It's interesting to me that, when someone publishes a study that might not support the liberal template of "renewables and sustainables rock", the moderators also publish a rebuttal. In fact, I have never seen a Climate Change article with a rebuttal attached EVER. Slashdot slanted, oh hell yes they are.... come on guys. Let ALL of the members in the forum speak.
Saudi? Hey! And Israel! Don't forget NSA and Israel - the most moral military on earth! They bomb hospitals under UN protection with the morality of the old testament!
Troll. Can't mod you. Moron. Jihadi's are homosexuals and pork eating cowards.
The bulk what can be consider "subsidies", under any reasonable definition, are targeted at renewables. In fact, 2/3 of energy "subsidies" are artificially sustaining the renewables market: http://cornerstonemag.net/u-s-...
Health Insurance companies are "sharing" prescription and condition history with "partners" that are paying them to... yes your PHI too. And, because they are first-parties (aka "partners") you aren't told about these data-sharing agreements, and you aren't given the ability to opt-out. The problem with this is that the other insurers (life, health, auto, etc.) and pharma companies subscribe to these data clearinghouses as "partners," allowing them all to circumvent HIPPA in-spirit, but remain within the letter. You may be no risk at all, taking an anti-depressant, however, the life insurer will rate you as a suicide / high risker.... see where I am going with this?
The spirit of HIPPA was to keep the fact that you are a pot smoking, HIV infected (but otherwise productive and high-functioning) person out of the hands of anyone THAT YOU DONT WANT TO HAVE IT.
Guess what, I work in healthcare and have 10 more storied like this.... if you think your health insurance and healthcare providers are vangaurds of privacy.... ROTFLMAO... you have no idea.
That's why the wealthy and famous are always admitted under pseudonyms and pay cash, but only to the Director of Account Payable.... LOL we normal people are fucked.
People, please think before you rush to buy this stuff. I can assure you that your data WILL BE SOLD to the utilities and by government agencies to regulate you into the stone age... or the EPA will reach into your living room and "help you green the house" by switching your HVAC off. It's really dumb.
They lie to you in the interview, "oh, it's rare, but there are a couples of weeks here and there, that we burn the midnight oil." Yeah, bullshit. 50-hours minimum, and everyone gives you the stink-eye, if you head for the door before 6PM. Suck it, corporate America. Sell your soul to the corporate idol for NOTHING in return. Once again, suck it.
phantonfive is not trolling. They always do recover.... but we do need to understand the mechanism that causes the bleaching. If it's human-induced, we need to curb that!
Fail. Market is changing. Change with it.
Amen brother. Do not deny the Gospel of Al Gore, lest ye have your head removed.
And then on the eighth day, Al Gore proclaimed that there shall be unicorns and happiness, for a true believers.
Climatologists are not mechanical engineers, they are PhD's. I agree, engineers are very careful about the details. However, PhD's don't have life-risk to consider. I fact, there is overt manipulation of the data upon which most (if not all) of the climate "conclusions" are based.
Further, engineers don't have the luxury of being influenced by confirmation biases or other cognitive issues.... because engineering data is wholly-objective and extremely repeatable. "climate science" is neither; the inductive processes they apply seem to lead down paths that would follow confirmation bias, repeatedly. I'm involved in science and a great mentor of mine once said that, "if you torture the data enough, it will tell you anything you want to hear...."
Thanks for throwing out ad hom attacks and red herrings. Now, back to the fact that Mark's data directly contradicts his own statements and conclusions. I'm sure that data is published in a peer-reviewed journal, too.... so let's talk about the issue I've raised.
Mark Serreze is a well-known person in the climate debate community. But the link above is to HIS OWN data which directly contradicts his statements in the NYT article. I'm not attacking him personally, but I have substantive conflict with the way he conveyed the veracity and conclusions about his own data.
Actually, the sea ice extent was LOWER in 2006, for NASA's own data. Further, this years ice extent is roughly equivalent to a couple years, over the past decade. What's happening hear is that several thousand people whom rely on the climate change scam, for their paycheck, are ramping up the BS so they can remain on the gravy train.... Here's the graph of the MASIE data.... feel like a real scientist, review it for yourself! https://realclimatescience.com...
And the bulk of comments will be that Microsoft is so wonderful, in spite of the mega-awful flaws.... we love it! Right?
North American is experiencing some of the coldest months on record. https://realclimatescience.com...
We will agree to disagree. A carrier making it less expensive to carry traffic that doesn't have to traverse another carrier (ergo it reduces the carriers costs) is just capitalism, which is good. I will stipulate that it makes it _possibly_ _somewhat_ more expensive to consume off-carrier content, but that's only if you are a maniac-streamer. In which case, that's your problem.
A violation of the principle of net neutrality would be either Fios or Verizon nerfing a non-Verizon / non-Fios service. In this case, they are just making it cheaper to consume bandwidth that remains on their backbone. Nerfing Netflix or prioritizing voice packets from another voice provider would be a violation of the net-neutral principles. Which they aren't doing.
Please stop calling simple algorithms AI. Algorithm != Artificial Intelligence. Stop losing our language to the losers in the marketing department. Respectfully, Huge Dilbert Fan
Wrong, they generally find rioting idiots to put down. By the way, the people you have to worry about, are not the people in uniforms. Generally, it's the dirt bags with no morals or ethics... aka the rioters in Furgeson. When's the last time you saw a bunch of white people rioting and destroying their own neighborhoods.... tick tock tick tock tick tock..... NHHHHHHHHH never.
Go fuck yourself, liberal loser. No translator required.
You're a complete retard and have not studied the History of Nazi Germany. The citizens where systematically disarmed, so that they could pose no credible threat to the Reich. The ONLY time that citizens were armed was during the pinch on Berlin, at which time anyone who could carry a Panzerfaust or rifle was pressed into service (at gunpoint) to serve until death or victory. Go crawl under your rock, liberal loser.
.
Personally, I am a free market person. If fans weren't so rabidly willing to pay the OBSCENE ticket prices, the market would correct downward. However, it would seem that the market is willing to support these OBSCENE ticket prices, so game on!!
It's interesting to me that, when someone publishes a study that might not support the liberal template of "renewables and sustainables rock", the moderators also publish a rebuttal. In fact, I have never seen a Climate Change article with a rebuttal attached EVER. Slashdot slanted, oh hell yes they are.... come on guys. Let ALL of the members in the forum speak.
Saudi? Hey! And Israel! Don't forget NSA and Israel - the most moral military on earth! They bomb hospitals under UN protection with the morality of the old testament!
Troll. Can't mod you. Moron. Jihadi's are homosexuals and pork eating cowards.
The bulk what can be consider "subsidies", under any reasonable definition, are targeted at renewables. In fact, 2/3 of energy "subsidies" are artificially sustaining the renewables market: http://cornerstonemag.net/u-s-...
The spirit of HIPPA was to keep the fact that you are a pot smoking, HIV infected (but otherwise productive and high-functioning) person out of the hands of anyone THAT YOU DONT WANT TO HAVE IT.
Guess what, I work in healthcare and have 10 more storied like this.... if you think your health insurance and healthcare providers are vangaurds of privacy.... ROTFLMAO... you have no idea.
That's why the wealthy and famous are always admitted under pseudonyms and pay cash, but only to the Director of Account Payable.... LOL we normal people are fucked.
Also, Soulskill is a douchebag.
People, please think before you rush to buy this stuff. I can assure you that your data WILL BE SOLD to the utilities and by government agencies to regulate you into the stone age... or the EPA will reach into your living room and "help you green the house" by switching your HVAC off. It's really dumb.
Greate pick Soulskill... a real yawner.
Wow, a liberal article published by Soulskill, the editorial leftie overlord... shocking.
They lie to you in the interview, "oh, it's rare, but there are a couples of weeks here and there, that we burn the midnight oil." Yeah, bullshit. 50-hours minimum, and everyone gives you the stink-eye, if you head for the door before 6PM. Suck it, corporate America. Sell your soul to the corporate idol for NOTHING in return. Once again, suck it.
Does it come with air conditioning? Wonder if you could have a two-seater?