...cooler if it wasnt Bono...
Had he asked me to stick around, i would have bailed. before I felt the urge to knock him unconcscious and wipe / shave that dirt on his chin
and those that are offended can choose to not participate them, or fuck off, which ever is easier.
Why do certain people feel this need to tell others how to act and what they find acceptable should be willed upon everyone else.
what in the hell are you babbling about?
I have never met a user that keeps passwords in a doc file.
Other than that I honestly cant make heads or tails from your rant.
I think making the person feel like shit is the general idea of yelling at them.
And most tech support people are decent even if they cant solve hte problem. but there are others I will lay into and I honestly dont care if it hurts their feelings because they are incompetant
We have that here too...
of course I had one idiot boss who interpreted that as: "I can tell you to leave at anytime but you have to give me atleast 2 months notice"
"have to" as in expected to but what was he gonna do about it type of thing
of course he is also a guy that would go around saying he wants to fire half of his employees (when in reality he should have been beaten with a sack of doorknobs to get the stupid out)
Well I do think publically badmouthing your company is grounds to be fired for.
Whether or not it is "at will"
The guy is a moron, and he did something a 16 year old is smart enough not to do.
And not breaking contracts...
they can do as they please in the way of allocating their resources. (not that bullshit bellsouth wants)
this is about physical lines how much to use for their products..
tehy are obligated to provide certain quantities of bandwidth for their customers but other than that. why cant they use their networks for different projects?
oh god, Nazi germany.
can we have a discussion without someone bring in Nazi Germany as an example...particularly when it doesnt even fit the circumstances.
oh you got a dictionary def, which is rather meaningless in day to day conversation...
the usage of the word illegal means to most people, breaking a law.
cock
It is not outlawed, it is against policy...
there is a difference.. you will not be arrested, you will be held accountable through employment...
Why do people insist on calling things illegal when it is simply against some rules
It isnt exactly security through anything,
what good does it do knowing that one sattelite is there....
knowing where a hundred sattelites doesnt do you much good if there are actually a thousand...
its basically, well useless
Why should they have to do that? why should a group HAVE to be sensative to another group?
It was activisions choice to do this, they have every right to do so... this group has every right to boycott...
we will see if that boycott matters. But what exactly did they do to deserve a lawsuit? talked ill of some group of people, oh no, i could have sworn that was perfectly legal (not necessarily popular though)
Will basically be like "Well since you are not in our target audience, therefore not purchasing our products in any quantity what so ever, well thanks for the boycott, it will only help sales"
Why do people think boycotts work when they are not really the purchasers anyways...
Bus boycotts worked because black people utilized that service.
This wont matter because Native Americans arent exactly the most significant purchasers of video games.
Why would they have to defend their rights?
they chose to publish their info on a medium that is designed things such as spiders in mind. The web actively encourages it. you post info there, you need to keep that in mind or be disregarded when you dont like what happens
they have the option of requiring everyone to register... they do not have the option of telling what people can do that is normally allowable by copyright
you dont go utilizing a new form of communication without atleast determining some of the ramifications, search engines arent new, screen scrapers arent new its all standard parts of the internet and all legal)
so what?
that sounds exactly fair.
Google is giving the person a teaser, a tiny bit of the info, useless on its own
Reuters etc is giving the whole piece of content.
there is a very clear and gaping distinction between the two
Honestly,
Just cause google called it beta before and now it doesnt did not change anything legally.
They were still open for legal attack just as much then as now (which is yet to be determined)
In all likelyhood they have nothing to worry about since they are simply aggregating data and well that is a use under copyright.
Newspapers, quite bitching,. most people wouldnt even read your particular site if it werent for google News.
These companies dont have a choice if they want to do business in China..
it is rather simple, either MS and Google comply, or they are not welcome in China.
and for those of you who think you would choose to be moral and not support censorship, I would love to see how fast you turn on those convictions if someone pulled up with a dumptruck of money.
You are somewhat correct...
But depending on the job, that four hours has to be made up somehow, aka, they have to be paid to actually do the work now.
same here, south east. granted I am younger and tend to be around younger and more fit but still when I am out and about I dont see the people that make this a fat state. (of course maybe that is the problem:)
Slashdot Mirror
...cooler if it wasnt Bono... Had he asked me to stick around, i would have bailed. before I felt the urge to knock him unconcscious and wipe / shave that dirt on his chin
and those that are offended can choose to not participate them, or fuck off, which ever is easier. Why do certain people feel this need to tell others how to act and what they find acceptable should be willed upon everyone else.
what in the hell are you babbling about? I have never met a user that keeps passwords in a doc file. Other than that I honestly cant make heads or tails from your rant.
Give it enough time the probability is nearly a certaintity.
I think making the person feel like shit is the general idea of yelling at them. And most tech support people are decent even if they cant solve hte problem. but there are others I will lay into and I honestly dont care if it hurts their feelings because they are incompetant
We have that here too... of course I had one idiot boss who interpreted that as: "I can tell you to leave at anytime but you have to give me atleast 2 months notice" "have to" as in expected to but what was he gonna do about it type of thing of course he is also a guy that would go around saying he wants to fire half of his employees (when in reality he should have been beaten with a sack of doorknobs to get the stupid out)
Well I do think publically badmouthing your company is grounds to be fired for. Whether or not it is "at will" The guy is a moron, and he did something a 16 year old is smart enough not to do.
the whole concept of "If i look at this code i am tainted is bullllshit...as in never been proven to exist"
if i reada book am i tainted from writing one...
the only people who repeat that lie are just trying to scare everyone else.
And not breaking contracts... they can do as they please in the way of allocating their resources. (not that bullshit bellsouth wants) this is about physical lines how much to use for their products.. tehy are obligated to provide certain quantities of bandwidth for their customers but other than that. why cant they use their networks for different projects?
oh god, Nazi germany. can we have a discussion without someone bring in Nazi Germany as an example...particularly when it doesnt even fit the circumstances.
yes i decided to call you a cock, just like you called me a jerk. kettle meet pot.
oh you got a dictionary def, which is rather meaningless in day to day conversation... the usage of the word illegal means to most people, breaking a law. cock
It is not outlawed, it is against policy... there is a difference.. you will not be arrested, you will be held accountable through employment... Why do people insist on calling things illegal when it is simply against some rules
It isnt exactly security through anything, what good does it do knowing that one sattelite is there.... knowing where a hundred sattelites doesnt do you much good if there are actually a thousand... its basically, well useless
Why should they have to do that? why should a group HAVE to be sensative to another group?
It was activisions choice to do this, they have every right to do so... this group has every right to boycott...
we will see if that boycott matters. But what exactly did they do to deserve a lawsuit? talked ill of some group of people, oh no, i could have sworn that was perfectly legal (not necessarily popular though)
Will basically be like "Well since you are not in our target audience, therefore not purchasing our products in any quantity what so ever, well thanks for the boycott, it will only help sales" Why do people think boycotts work when they are not really the purchasers anyways... Bus boycotts worked because black people utilized that service. This wont matter because Native Americans arent exactly the most significant purchasers of video games.
Why would they have to defend their rights? they chose to publish their info on a medium that is designed things such as spiders in mind. The web actively encourages it. you post info there, you need to keep that in mind or be disregarded when you dont like what happens they have the option of requiring everyone to register... they do not have the option of telling what people can do that is normally allowable by copyright you dont go utilizing a new form of communication without atleast determining some of the ramifications, search engines arent new, screen scrapers arent new its all standard parts of the internet and all legal)
so what? that sounds exactly fair. Google is giving the person a teaser, a tiny bit of the info, useless on its own Reuters etc is giving the whole piece of content. there is a very clear and gaping distinction between the two
how is doing what is required under the law "doing evil" honestly
Honestly, Just cause google called it beta before and now it doesnt did not change anything legally. They were still open for legal attack just as much then as now (which is yet to be determined) In all likelyhood they have nothing to worry about since they are simply aggregating data and well that is a use under copyright. Newspapers, quite bitching,. most people wouldnt even read your particular site if it werent for google News.
These companies dont have a choice if they want to do business in China..
it is rather simple, either MS and Google comply, or they are not welcome in China.
and for those of you who think you would choose to be moral and not support censorship, I would love to see how fast you turn on those convictions if someone pulled up with a dumptruck of money.
That just means the offer was too small.
You are somewhat correct... But depending on the job, that four hours has to be made up somehow, aka, they have to be paid to actually do the work now.
same here, south east. granted I am younger and tend to be around younger and more fit but still when I am out and about I dont see the people that make this a fat state. (of course maybe that is the problem :)
What part of the state do you live in? Because I also live in wisconsin and I have not noticed an abundance of fat people