Nobody really knows why "processed foods" cause harm. Studies on salt itself say too much salt affects some people negatively, but not all. Salt sensitivity can usually be detected with specific tests. And lower-processed foods are often also salty. Being heavily processed by itself doesn't mean it automatically has more salt.
As the intro hinted, the exact cause is only speculation at this point. Further studies would be needed to isolate the offending trait(s). Candidate factors include but are not limited to:
* More alleged salt * More MSG * More alleged oil/fat * Less fiber and "roughage" * Longer cooking period * More preservatives and "odd" chemicals * More frying * On the shelf longer * Less of certain vitamins and minerals
Makes sense. Grading homework is boring repetitive work.
That's why Scantron and the like was invented a generation ago. It didn't need AI.
The problem often happens when writing exams are mixed with fact exams such that both the writing and the facts in the writing have to be checked.
The mixed approach should be used only occasionally to reduce education costs. However, for mixing to be effective, humans will be needed to not just mark problems, but show how to fix the writing. AI is not good enough for that (yet), other than making suggested guesses based on mass pattern matching of writing samples.
It's technically possible to hook anything to anything in "the cloud". But the devil's in the details of coordinating communication conventions and data sharing (including non-sharing per security risk).
It's like saying, "At work I can punch anybody in the face I want". That is technically true.
let's looks at the Titanic sinking and the classic "women and children first".
In practice, it was "Women, Children, and the Rich" first. I bet if the life rafts were somehow damaged in an accident today, leaving not enough space, it would be the same. The ship employees would save Jeff Bezos over Joe Nobody, forced with a choice.
But I generally agree with your point. Politics often ends up being about social and emotional factors. For example, it's common hear to "he/she hates America" or along the lines of "he/she hates blue/red culture". That's about one's alleged internal motivations, biases, background, not raw numbers.
Is he/she "one of us" is probably the biggest factor in politics.
Roughly a month ago, somebody "glued" the first two semi-clear images together into an animated gif to give a rough sense of stereo, and someone noted the larger lobe appeared relatively flat. I think it was on Reddit. I couldn't find the comment itself, but here's an example of the image:
[consumers] gave control over our behavior to a few big players because their products were slick and had a lot of cash invested in them. We centralized... and in centralizing we gave control over...
It's not necessarily slick-ness, it's the Network Effect: everybody goes "there" because everybody else goes "there".
Perhaps with some adjustments, such as summaries/titles and basic markup for quoting/linking etc., Usenet could be resurrected as a primary discussion and announcement source.
Individuals can't always be available at the right place at the right time. That's why Ublyft have big servers: efficient and timely allocation of resources. Yes, it's an option, but a limited one. And if the web ones get big enough, they'll buy out local cab co's.
The worst I can say for libreoffice is that it looks a bit clunky...
Neither LibreOffice nor MS-Office are the pinnacle of UI design by far. You pretty much memorize where the features you need are (or Google them) and stop expecting logical grouping and labelling in the UI.
But LibreOffice is not always compatible with MS-Office and vice versa. The LibreOffice.docx converter/renderer is not perfect.
Compatibility is the only reason MS still exists. Businesses want software and documents to work the same on all their PC's. If it were a game of raw merit and price, MS would be dead by now, gone the way of Zune and Windows Phone.
By some accounts the MS-Word "standard" is convoluted on purpose so as to make the creation of a fully Word-compatible editor very difficult. MS started a plan to clean it up, but realized a clean standard is a clonable standard. Disclaimer: I have no solid proof of their motivations, and Hanlon's Razor may apply.
Slashdot Mirror
You should expect that we will request more evidence of such a conspiracy.
Nobody really knows why "processed foods" cause harm. Studies on salt itself say too much salt affects some people negatively, but not all. Salt sensitivity can usually be detected with specific tests. And lower-processed foods are often also salty. Being heavily processed by itself doesn't mean it automatically has more salt.
As the intro hinted, the exact cause is only speculation at this point. Further studies would be needed to isolate the offending trait(s). Candidate factors include but are not limited to:
* More alleged salt
* More MSG
* More alleged oil/fat
* Less fiber and "roughage"
* Longer cooking period
* More preservatives and "odd" chemicals
* More frying
* On the shelf longer
* Less of certain vitamins and minerals
That's why Scantron and the like was invented a generation ago. It didn't need AI.
The problem often happens when writing exams are mixed with fact exams such that both the writing and the facts in the writing have to be checked.
The mixed approach should be used only occasionally to reduce education costs. However, for mixing to be effective, humans will be needed to not just mark problems, but show how to fix the writing. AI is not good enough for that (yet), other than making suggested guesses based on mass pattern matching of writing samples.
It's technically possible to hook anything to anything in "the cloud". But the devil's in the details of coordinating communication conventions and data sharing (including non-sharing per security risk).
It's like saying, "At work I can punch anybody in the face I want". That is technically true.
In practice, it was "Women, Children, and the Rich" first. I bet if the life rafts were somehow damaged in an accident today, leaving not enough space, it would be the same. The ship employees would save Jeff Bezos over Joe Nobody, forced with a choice.
But I generally agree with your point. Politics often ends up being about social and emotional factors. For example, it's common hear to "he/she hates America" or along the lines of "he/she hates blue/red culture". That's about one's alleged internal motivations, biases, background, not raw numbers.
Is he/she "one of us" is probably the biggest factor in politics.
Did my Make Humans Great Again hat give me away?
Not really. It's visibly a slight ovoid in good telescope.
Roughly a month ago, somebody "glued" the first two semi-clear images together into an animated gif to give a rough sense of stereo, and someone noted the larger lobe appeared relatively flat. I think it was on Reddit. I couldn't find the comment itself, but here's an example of the image:
https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/...
(The image was posted multiple times. Reddit has dupe issues too ;-)
Seems the gov't shutdown made analysts hungry.
A looong way if you ask the Rams.
I misread it as "Bee Gees", and a tune started playing in my head: "Ah, Ah, Ah, counting to five, counting to five..."
Your DP robots look fake, which is normally redundant unless you do it really bad.
It's not necessarily slick-ness, it's the Network Effect: everybody goes "there" because everybody else goes "there".
Perhaps with some adjustments, such as summaries/titles and basic markup for quoting/linking etc., Usenet could be resurrected as a primary discussion and announcement source.
Nevermind, you pretty much covered that already. Premature Enter key. Sorry.
Individuals can't always be available at the right place at the right time. That's why Ublyft have big servers: efficient and timely allocation of resources. Yes, it's an option, but a limited one. And if the web ones get big enough, they'll buy out local cab co's.
Neither LibreOffice nor MS-Office are the pinnacle of UI design by far. You pretty much memorize where the features you need are (or Google them) and stop expecting logical grouping and labelling in the UI.
What about collaborating with vendors, partners, consultants, and customers?
Being in a duopoly is a pretty good position also. Life is easier when you have 1 competitor instead of 7.
It's a "Why would God need a spaceship?" moment.
It's making my business negotiations with Nigerian princes very difficult. Maybe I should go into boner pills instead.
But LibreOffice is not always compatible with MS-Office and vice versa. The LibreOffice .docx converter/renderer is not perfect.
Compatibility is the only reason MS still exists. Businesses want software and documents to work the same on all their PC's. If it were a game of raw merit and price, MS would be dead by now, gone the way of Zune and Windows Phone.
By some accounts the MS-Word "standard" is convoluted on purpose so as to make the creation of a fully Word-compatible editor very difficult. MS started a plan to clean it up, but realized a clean standard is a clonable standard. Disclaimer: I have no solid proof of their motivations, and Hanlon's Razor may apply.
Not Putie this time, but by T's hair: Bigly static charge.
...resist.
...Midgets who only process JSON.
There's a nice racket ready to be exploited: robot insurance. I need a break from my meteor insurance business anyhow.
Um, that begs the question: How are capitalistic totalitarians better?