As an American Slashdot reader, for all science articles I suggest that you stop providing both metric and imperial units. Metric is fine with us. Really.
If we need the conversion, we can do it in our heads. Most importantly, it will improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the comments by eliminating the ever-present unit-conversion threads.
Fossil fuels are dirty, old, inefficient, and obsolete. Besides, we'll be needing them for the raw materials for polymers and whatnot.
It's simple economics.
As is usually the case, conservatives are on the wrong side of progress into the future. They want to keep things the same but that is an impossibility. Life is change and therefore will always be at odds with conservative values.
That is precisely the side that conservatives are on: the change will happen when it makes since economically. Not because of burdensome government intervention, but because of innovation and simple economics.
TV Series or Movie? I don't know about the series, but in the movie, it is Agent 23 (played by The Rock) who snatches the fly out of the air and tosses it into a trashcan.
In a 40-minute speech given in 2014 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdR8uILg7TQ), in which he promised to use unilateral, executive action, the President referred to himself - “I,” “me,” and “my” - 199 times, CNS News reports. That's once every 12 seconds.
I certainly agree. However, if you are putting in the accent, then it goes over both the first and second "e", not just the last. I used to think that it only went over the last "e" (because of the American pronunciation).
I only point it out because it is the kind of thing that someone might notice on a job application.
2. If you can't get a job solely because your age is written on your resumé, then age discrimination is clearly still a problem.
Since you care enough to go to the trouble to write the word with an accent, I'd like to point out that correct spelling is résumé, which I was not aware of until recently. For years, I also thought that it was spelled resumé.
Sorry, I was implying that the issue was a non-U.S. birth certificate. Someone who presented a non-U.S. birth certificate could have acquired U.S. citizenship and be eligible to vote - the official can't know just by looking at a birth certificate. So, when presented with a non-U.S. birth certificate, were the officials also demanding proof of citizenship before registration is allowed? The law doesn't demand that they do. The ridiculously easy loophole is still there.
Casio Lineage Tough Solar Radio controlled MULTIBAND 6 LCW-M300D-1AJF
Nice looking analog display + plus digital for a few things. The best feature is that the time never needs to be set (radio sync to NIST) plus never needs a new battery (solar). Super happy with this watch. Around $140.
"... Automated voter registration is actually a more secure way of doing things," California Secretary of State Alex Padilla told HuffPost in September. Potential voters "have to demonstrate proof of age, the vast majority of time people are showing a birth certificate or a passport, which also reflects citizenship. That's arguably more secure than someone checking a box under penalty of perjury," Padilla said.
A birth certificate doesn't reflect current citizenship. So is a potential voter being denied registration without proving citizenship? Nowhere in the article does it reference *any* proof of citizenship being required.
The article says that the law doesn't make it legal for non-citizens to register, but it also doesn't show that it isn't trivial for a non-citizen to be registered to vote in California.
Just WHY are the window buttons not at the top right of the window? Why is there no title bar? Why is there no visible border?
Hopefully this might address the problem that I have. When I'm using the touch interface on my Surface Pro, I do have problems using my finger to select between minimize, maximize, and close. I don't know what the solution is, because I use both the mouse interface and the touch interface quite a bit.
What in the world are you talking about? From the report:
Emails produced to the Committee by the DOE showa sequence of events leading to a premeditated scheme by senior DOE employees “to squash the prospects of Senate support” for H.R. 5544 and the LDRRP.
plus
D. DOE management worked to kill the LDRRP because it did not further the Administration’s goals to advance climate research.
I'm not trying to prove anything -- I certainly have no knowledge about this other than what is in the congressional report. So, this has nothing to do with a "crazy-ass website" - that quote comes straight from the report.
Emails unearthed during the investigation “show a sequence of events leading to a premeditated scheme by senior DoE employees ‘to squash the prospects of Senate support'” for the radiation act, a move that lawmakers claim was meant to help advance President Obama’s own climate change goals.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas), chair of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, released a wide-ranging report on Tuesday that shows how senior Obama administration officials retaliated against a leading scientist and plotted ways to block a congressional inquiry surrounding key research into the impact of radiation.
A top DoE scientist (Dr. Noelle Metting) who liaised with Congress on the matter was fired by the Obama administration for being too forthright with lawmakers, according to the report, which provides an in-depth look at the White House’s efforts to ensure senior staffers toe the administration’s line.
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
As an American Slashdot reader, for all science articles I suggest that you stop providing both metric and imperial units. Metric is fine with us. Really.
If we need the conversion, we can do it in our heads. Most importantly, it will improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the comments by eliminating the ever-present unit-conversion threads.
At Paddy's, we use SHA-Dynasty.
Fossil fuels are dirty, old, inefficient, and obsolete. Besides, we'll be needing them for the raw materials for polymers and whatnot.
It's simple economics.
As is usually the case, conservatives are on the wrong side of progress into the future. They want to keep things the same but that is an impossibility. Life is change and therefore will always be at odds with conservative values.
That is precisely the side that conservatives are on: the change will happen when it makes since economically. Not because of burdensome government intervention, but because of innovation and simple economics.
Rotors in enclosures are much less efficient.
But then you say:
This isn't a long range endurance vehicle. It doesn't even have to be efficient.
TV Series or Movie? I don't know about the series, but in the movie, it is Agent 23 (played by The Rock) who snatches the fly out of the air and tosses it into a trashcan.
Get Smart - Agent 23
The crash into a building bit at the end is not part of the movie, obviously.
In a 40-minute speech given in 2014 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdR8uILg7TQ), in which he promised to use unilateral, executive action, the President referred to himself - “I,” “me,” and “my” - 199 times, CNS News reports. That's once every 12 seconds.
Was it posted as part of a summary on Slashdot?
Hah! Very good! I stand corrected.
Going back 32 years, the winner always take less than 54% of the popular vote (Bill Clinton only got 43% in '92). Pretty divided *always*.
The U.S. is almost equally divided after every Presidential election. Why is it that this phrase is only trotted out when a Republican is sworn in?
I certainly agree. However, if you are putting in the accent, then it goes over both the first and second "e", not just the last. I used to think that it only went over the last "e" (because of the American pronunciation).
I only point it out because it is the kind of thing that someone might notice on a job application.
2. If you can't get a job solely because your age is written on your resumé, then age discrimination is clearly still a problem.
Since you care enough to go to the trouble to write the word with an accent, I'd like to point out that correct spelling is résumé, which I was not aware of until recently. For years, I also thought that it was spelled resumé.
Sorry, I was implying that the issue was a non-U.S. birth certificate. Someone who presented a non-U.S. birth certificate could have acquired U.S. citizenship and be eligible to vote - the official can't know just by looking at a birth certificate. So, when presented with a non-U.S. birth certificate, were the officials also demanding proof of citizenship before registration is allowed? The law doesn't demand that they do. The ridiculously easy loophole is still there.
Casio Lineage Tough Solar Radio controlled MULTIBAND 6 LCW-M300D-1AJF
Nice looking analog display + plus digital for a few things. The best feature is that the time never needs to be set (radio sync to NIST) plus never needs a new battery (solar). Super happy with this watch. Around $140.
It's part of the resurgence of ASCII-only websites - produces a warmer tone of text.
"... Automated voter registration is actually a more secure way of doing things," California Secretary of State Alex Padilla told HuffPost in September. Potential voters "have to demonstrate proof of age, the vast majority of time people are showing a birth certificate or a passport, which also reflects citizenship. That's arguably more secure than someone checking a box under penalty of perjury," Padilla said.
A birth certificate doesn't reflect current citizenship. So is a potential voter being denied registration without proving citizenship? Nowhere in the article does it reference *any* proof of citizenship being required.
The article says that the law doesn't make it legal for non-citizens to register, but it also doesn't show that it isn't trivial for a non-citizen to be registered to vote in California.
Just WHY are the window buttons not at the top right of the window? Why is there no title bar? Why is there no visible border?
Hopefully this might address the problem that I have. When I'm using the touch interface on my Surface Pro, I do have problems using my finger to select between minimize, maximize, and close. I don't know what the solution is, because I use both the mouse interface and the touch interface quite a bit.
You'd think we'd be back down to $0.75/gallon gas, but it leveled off at around $2.00.
With $0.49/gallon taxes (average)? That would be amazing! In Pennsylvania, the tax is almost $0.70/gallon!
It doesn't have to have affected the election to be fake news.
...
Trump got only 302 votes.
Fake news! Fake news! Trump received 304 votes.
Debbie Reynolds iconic? Without question.
From the report:
Emails produced to the Committee by the DOE showa sequence of events leading to a premeditated scheme by senior DOE employees “to squash the prospects of Senate support” for H.R. 5544 and the LDRRP.
plus
D. DOE management worked to kill the LDRRP because it did not further the Administration’s goals to advance climate research.
I'm not trying to prove anything -- I certainly have no knowledge about this other than what is in the congressional report. So, this has nothing to do with a "crazy-ass website" - that quote comes straight from the report.
Emails unearthed during the investigation “show a sequence of events leading to a premeditated scheme by senior DoE employees ‘to squash the prospects of Senate support'” for the radiation act, a move that lawmakers claim was meant to help advance President Obama’s own climate change goals.
Top DOE Scientist fired by Obama administration
Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas), chair of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, released a wide-ranging report on Tuesday that shows how senior Obama administration officials retaliated against a leading scientist and plotted ways to block a congressional inquiry surrounding key research into the impact of radiation.
A top DoE scientist (Dr. Noelle Metting) who liaised with Congress on the matter was fired by the Obama administration for being too forthright with lawmakers, according to the report, which provides an in-depth look at the White House’s efforts to ensure senior staffers toe the administration’s line.