if I recall, I tried 1.5 for a day before the constant crashing and horrible "new and improved" (== "hey look, we copied IE more, like us!") everything made me switch back.
Psst.. sony.. if you want to lock people in to certain hardware, the idea is generally to lock them in so they will/keep buying new versions of the hardware/. If "upgrading" requires all new software, the point is lost.
Until something comes along that you never expected to be "non-portable code". Everything would be portable to everywhere already if we all had infinite forsight.
how would it even go against the license? You can't link to the kernel itself without opening your code, but providing an interface/layer/ would allow you to link to a dual-licensed layer. Nothing wrong with that.
The real question is, why are they talking about it? It sounds like they just dont want to open anything, even the interface (otherwise, just write it. There's nothing stopping you. This isnt like telling somebody who thought linux was ready for the desktop "write your own drivers if you dont like it!" these are corporations who already have developers developing things for the linux kernel.[*otherwise it wouldnt have been an issue in the first place])
P.S.: Drivers, if absolutely no other part of the computer, should be open. These are the parts that make the computer actually compute.
I saw various things on the recently downloaded files list when I got home. I asked him about it, he said he tried to download some things, but that he never ran them because he couldnt find out where they downloaded to. Now I have paranoia.
I doubt the numerous problems with long lines will ever be fixed unless someone is willing to walk through the tangled web and fix vim's flaws, for only the pleasure of having these fixes rejected by purists.
Ever try to talk to someone who has their cellphone speaker turned up too loud, causing you to hear your own voice every now and then? It makes it really hard to get a decent stream of words out.
remember that svn always uses more than double the actual space required to hold the files for a "working copy". For "one-way" updates, svn is _NOT_ the answer.
+1 insightful? What are you, a moron?
if I recall, I tried 1.5 for a day before the constant crashing and horrible "new and improved" (== "hey look, we copied IE more, like us!") everything made me switch back.
I'm sure the people who used to have the screennames shoppingbuddy and moviefone dont like this at all.
BMW(I think) has been saying that design is a mere 10 years away for at least 10 years now.
Why are these not built in to the standard distribution? Firefox is unusable without them.
Psst.. sony.. if you want to lock people in to certain hardware, the idea is generally to lock them in so they will /keep buying new versions of the hardware/. If "upgrading" requires all new software, the point is lost.
Until something comes along that you never expected to be "non-portable code". Everything would be portable to everywhere already if we all had infinite forsight.
how would it even go against the license? You can't link to the kernel itself without opening your code, but providing an interface /layer/ would allow you to link to a dual-licensed layer. Nothing wrong with that.
The real question is, why are they talking about it? It sounds like they just dont want to open anything, even the interface (otherwise, just write it. There's nothing stopping you. This isnt like telling somebody who thought linux was ready for the desktop "write your own drivers if you dont like it!" these are corporations who already have developers developing things for the linux kernel.[*otherwise it wouldnt have been an issue in the first place])
P.S.: Drivers, if absolutely no other part of the computer, should be open. These are the parts that make the computer actually compute.
I was just thinking yesterday what a horrible idea that would be and how glad I am that google doesnt do this. I'm so cool.
I saw various things on the recently downloaded files list when I got home. I asked him about it, he said he tried to download some things, but that he never ran them because he couldnt find out where they downloaded to.
Now I have paranoia.
now that we already signed up for partnerworld to get the developer versions
Not knowing what you're doing isnt a security issue. Not allowing clients to create symlinks to otherwise unshared files /is/ a security issue.
is that what counts as a good UI these days? Holy fuck.
The GUI is dead. Bash, time to step up and take its place.
You mean simply adding .com isnt enough to make it unique to google?? Watch out Openoffice.org!
/hate everybody
(and Gaim is completely distinguished from GAIM, too! yep, sure is!)
I'm pretty sure that means all their profits from t-shirt sales probably already are going to charity for a while :)
** Whacks kishore.avv with a newspaper
No.
** Whacks kishore.avv with a newspaper
No.
I doubt the numerous problems with long lines will ever be fixed unless someone is willing to walk through the tangled web and fix vim's flaws, for only the pleasure of having these fixes rejected by purists.
..utilizing my knowledge of future events now that I've somehow travelled to 1997!
Ever try to talk to someone who has their cellphone speaker turned up too loud, causing you to hear your own voice every now and then? It makes it really hard to get a decent stream of words out.
sounds like you want.. damnit, can't find it.. anyway, it was basically a zork-style shell.
Am I the only one who lost all sympathy for katrina victims once people started talking about rebuilding?
This is not a troll, this is a question. Why should anyone support people who want federal aid in order to continue living below sea level?
incorrect. Not at all what I meant. (at least here, near Atlanta)
Comcast High Speed Internet by itself costs $1 more than a bundle containing Comcast High Speed Internet + Basic Cable
with Comcast, you dont need to buy the "Bundle", but if you buy internet without TV, it costs more than getting internet with TV.
if QLink really did become AOL, then yes. Very early on in the life of AOL, my mother complained about them abusing her credit card.
remember that svn always uses more than double the actual space required to hold the files for a "working copy". For "one-way" updates, svn is _NOT_ the answer.