Slashdot Mirror


The Mind of an Inventor

kipb writes to tell us that Newsweek has an interesting article about Danny Hillis and the company he co-founded called Applied Minds. One of the featured devices that Hillis talks about is a device designed to increase the amount of privacy one has working in the average corporate cubicle. "Babble" is about the size of a paperback book and plugs into the phone with two external speakers that you place on the top of your cube. While holding a normal conversation on the phone Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice which makes your conversation practically unintelligible to people as close as 4 feet away.

135 comments

  1. Brilliant by HungSquirrel · · Score: 1
    "Babble" is about the size of a paperback book and plugs into the phone with two external speakers that you place on the top of your cube. While holding a normal conversation on the phone Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice which makes your conversation practically unintelligible to people as close as 4 feet away.

    Ingenious. I would love to test one.
    --
    $ whatis themeaningoflife
    themeaningoflife: not found
    1. Re:Brilliant by sam_paris · · Score: 1

      Just a minute.. If people four feet away can hear an unintellible conversation, surely the person on the other end of the phone will be hearing "random meaningless snipits of your own voice" too...

    2. Re:Brilliant by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about buying a few thousand and hiding them at strategic locations in the meeting places of the US Congress and other world parliaments? Of course it is always possible that nobody would notice since most of what comes out of those places is practically unintelligible anyway.....

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:Brilliant by HungSquirrel · · Score: 1

      It may work if you put the device near one corner and you have your conversation at the other corner. However, you're thinking inside the box...or cubicle, in this case. This has numerous applications, from the mundane to the Mission Impossible.

      --
      $ whatis themeaningoflife
      themeaningoflife: not found
    4. Re:Brilliant by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      My cubicle neighbor's nonsense is annoying enough, and now this device will make me suffer his inate monologues full-time?

      How about a device that will play "sh!" everytime his voice is recognized (think Austin Powers 2).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Brilliant by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny

      While holding a normal conversation on the phone Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice which makes your conversation practically unintelligible to people as close as 4 feet away.

      Yes, I believe this device could be a change catalyst which would allow us to re-engineer our business case and leverage best-practice synergies to proactively actualise our bottom-line.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Brilliant by Pyrion · · Score: 0
      Intelligible, but wholly uninteresting.

      Barring the State of the Union, who honestly watches C-SPAN for longer than fifteen minutes?

      *yawn*

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    7. Re:Brilliant by wireloose · · Score: 1

      I would guess it's at least as useful as my Cone of Silence.

    8. Re:Brilliant by weeboo0104 · · Score: 0

      I've seen the Babble tested in my office.
      When you talk on the phone, it plays loops of a script that you record on it. While the noises coming out of the speakers are intelligible, the person talking on the phone was clearly understood both by the other person on the line and by the persons cube neighbors. The way this device seems most effective is by annoying anyone within earshot enough to make them move far enough away so they couldn't hear you in the first place.

      We did have a lot of fun testing it though.

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    9. Re:Brilliant by Pyrowolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Go here to see babble... go here to hear babble.

    10. Re:Brilliant by op12 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, I believe this device could be a change catalyst which would allow us to re-engineer our business case and leverage best-practice synergies to proactively actualise our bottom-line.

      Sounds like ozmanjusri got a Babble plugin for Slashdot.

    11. Re:Brilliant by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you're supposed to put the speakers on top of your cubicle you first need a top on your cubicle.

    12. Re:Brilliant by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      I saw this tested after the CES show this year. It was the most obnoxious thing I've ever seen. I'm better off just playing lowlevel random junk on my PC! Then at least I can have some control of the white noise. :P

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  2. What's wrong with a hand operated air raid siren? by Steven+Reddie · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would also make calls unintelligible within 4 feet.

  3. "I hear voices" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile Johnson in the next cube has been interpreting the voices as instructions to bring an AK-47 to work and begin the Day of Reckoning.

    1. Re:"I hear voices" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damnit! Obviously it's noot protecting my privacy as much as it's supposed to!

  4. Great by SpectreBinary · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the two morons I am forced to sit next to at work who never get off the phone can broadcast MORE OF THEIR VOICE TO ME.

    I'd break down crying if I weren't already burnt out inside.

    1. Re:Great by Peldor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, but with random words spouted by the new black box, you'll have a million-monkey-writes-Shakespeare chance of hearing something intelligent.

      Here's a nice project for someone: Play the POTUS's speeches into this thing and record what comes out.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I find meaningless babble a lot less distracting than actual conversation.

    3. Re:Great by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      So you are saying his odds of hearing something intelligent are increasing? Lucky bastard...

    4. Re:Great by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Slashdot!

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  5. Oh Excellent by colonslashslash · · Score: 4, Funny
    Now, not only do I get to hear my neighbouring co-workers babble incoherent and meaningless nonsense whilst I'm on the phone, but I get to hear my own voice doing the exact same thing!

    How is this a good invention?

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:Oh Excellent by Analogy+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only do I hear chatty Cathy's running monologue on her post menopausal hot flashes and yeast infections with her girlfriends, but I get it in club mix stereo....great!!!

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  6. route to postal by welshwaterloo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "[..]place on the top of your cube[..] Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice."

    Oh great. Gimme 40 of those in an office & see how long before someone snaps...

    the voices! the voices!..!

    1. Re:route to postal by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ooh, good call.

      Let's fill it up with subliminal hints.

      'Theyhateyou'. 'Fear'. 'Worry.' 'Unworthy'. 'Panic'. 'Cthulhu fh'tagn!' Just underlaid with ordinary conversation.

      See how long it is before management calls in an exorcist or a Feng Shui consultant to rid the building of whatever it is that's troubling the staff...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:route to postal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nina: "Corporate accounts payable, Nina speaking. Just a moment."

      Nina: "Corporate accounts payable, Nina speaking. Just a moment."

      Nina: "Corporate accounts payable, Nina speaking. Just a moment."

  7. Anti-RIAA Applications by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    Wow, is this a privacy application or a tool to help me hear my own voice?

    If I plug this into my computer will it make my music downloads unintelligable to them? Terrific! This will also bring technobabble to a new high (low).

  8. Distracting for yourself by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would be really bad to start hearing yourself LCD Display with your spewing random comments out whilst your trying to speak.
    It could mean the difference Also, in 2020, everyone on between winning a contract or losing a customer.

    I really couldn't put up with it for long sci-fi show that was from the creator of Buffy before I smashed it up.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Distracting for yourself by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else read that then re-read the snippets to see if there was some subliminal message?

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  9. What good is this? by __aalnoi707 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why Is this Useful. Where at work, its noisy enough as it Is, why add more to it. Plus when did Privicay become an Issue at the job. I can see this to twart coorproate espinoge but really. I have headaches enough at work listening to stupid people I dont need any more of It

    1. Re:What good is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I hAve a HEAdaCHE FrOM READing yuur Ps0t wiTH all TEH raNDom CapitaliZation.

    2. Re:What good is this? by parkrrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I heard this guy interviewed on NPR's Day to Day a month or two ago. He contends that it works better than noise cancellation because the nonsense doesn't activate the speech-recognition parts of the brain in the same way that even a quiet conversation down the hall might. In some sense, your brain gives up on trying to interpret the babble and starts ignoring it, whereas a barely-audible conversation will just make some part of your brain work harder to attempt to pick out the signal from the noise.

      So, in your case, you would actually be less distracted by the stupid people in the next cube, even though they might objectively be a bit louder.

    3. Re:What good is this? by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      >>I can see this to twart coorproate espinoge

      A good point, and well made. Indeed, why do we need this device when we could just learn how to spell like yourself in order to twart all the espinoge?

      -Nano.

    4. Re:What good is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YoU FOrgOt tO mENsHon HiSS iNabIlITy to SPeL aS wElL AS tHe cOMplete lAck uV puNGsHuAShIn It SoUndS lyKE thE StoOpiditY hE is SO aFraDe ov iz ruBBinG oF on Him

  10. Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This guy seems like more of a Mad Scientist than an inventor to me.

    1. Re:Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by dannixon · · Score: 1

      Wired carried an article a few months back on Applied Minds. It's funny that the article likens Hillis to Willy Wonka, so you're probably not the only person that got that impression. ;-)

    2. Re:Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Hey, mad scientists can be inventors too! Remember the left-handed hammer? The salad super battery? The Sludge-o-Matic machine? The diamond-core Chron-O-John time machine? The hamster-driven high-voltage generator?

      What would the world be like without mad scientists?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would be stuck on Monkey Island, obviously :p

    4. Re:Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by Casca · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking someone already invented this device. Its the only plausible explanation I can come up with for the local morning radio "personalities".

      --
      Casca
    5. Re:Inventor? Or Mad Scientist? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Somewhere with less time travelling necessitated by evil, sentient, armed (as in, having arms) purple tentacles.

  11. Meaningless Snipits by Goody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if the "meaningless snipits" just happen to have the words "fire", "bankruptcy", "layoffs", "harassment", "pregnant" or "terror" in them?

    --
    Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    1. Re:Meaningless Snipits by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      What if the "meaningless snipits" just happen to have the words "fire", "bankruptcy", "layoffs", "harassment", "pregnant" or "terror" in them?

      Ooh. Now I want one of these. Never mind the rest of it, just that last word and perhaps others like it. Hook it up to your VOIP system and call a likeminded prankster, and leave it running. It'd gum up Echelon something awful :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Meaningless Snipits by menkhaura · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And coincidently you wouldn't show up at work the next morning...

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    3. Re:Meaningless Snipits by StupidKatz · · Score: 2, Funny

      And coincidently you wouldn't show up at work the next morning... ... which is why you make the call from your boss' phone. :)

    4. Re:Meaningless Snipits by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      layoff the harrasement fire, a pregnant terror is a bankruptcy of ammunition

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  12. User testing? by Peregr1n · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how much user testing they have tried with this product. It sounds like the helpful MS Office paperclip, or automatic spell checking as you go along - great ideas in theory but intrinsically flawed in practice.

    Privacy or not, I cannot think of anything more irritating, to myself, colleagues and the person I'm talking to on the phone, than meaningless drivel coming out of my speakers in my voice.

    I can hear it now:
    Me: Can you confirm that order please?
    Stationers: Two printer cartridges, twelve reams of paper, and one partridge in a pear tree.

    1. Re:User testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... I cannot think of anything more irritating... than meaningless drivel coming out of my speakers in my voice.

      Listen tu urself, Dude!

  13. wait.. _I'M_ as close as four feet away! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Ever try to talk to someone who has their cellphone speaker turned up too loud, causing you to hear your own voice every now and then? It makes it really hard to get a decent stream of words out.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  14. ... and we're hiring by yppiz · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you are in the SF area and very well versed in Java, C, or AJAX-like techniques, and looking to work on really interesting problems, let me know. Bonus points if you're a hacker (in the traditional sense).

    --Pat

    1. Re:... and we're hiring by yppiz · · Score: 4, Informative
      I should have mentioned that the we in the parent post is Applied Minds, the company that Danny Hillis co-founded.

      --Pat

    2. Re:... and we're hiring by carndearg · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those of you who modded the parent offtopic should check out the guy's www site:

      http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~zippy

      "I work at Applied Minds with Danny Hillis, Kurt Bollacker, and a bunch of other cool people."

    3. Re:... and we're hiring by yppiz · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Thank you. Some times, I forget that people don't automatically know that Slashdot User #574466 works at Applied Minds.

      --Pat

    4. Re:... and we're hiring by carndearg · · Score: 1
      Any time:)
      Never let an easily viewable web link on an in-context post get in the way of the herd instinct of Slashdot moderators.

      Shame you're on the other side of the world or I'd send a CV in myself.

    5. Re:... and we're hiring by MooseTick · · Score: 2, Funny

      "and looking to work on really interesting problems. ... Bonus points if you're a hacker (in the traditional sense). "

      Do you have any projects involving boring problems? That's what I'm looking for. Also, I have a non-traditional hacker friend who wonders if you are flexible?

  15. How about... by Spencer+Mabrito · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...reading the linked article? It is full of descriptions of amazing things, and indeed does say that Hillis is quite childlike - his inventions are almost toys, very expensive and shiny toys. It's not just Babble.

    --
    --;
  16. Mind of Mentifex by Mentifex · · Score: 1, Informative

    Danny Hillis was once a big name in artificial intelligence.

    His Connection Machine was an awesome, state-of-the art supercomputer.

    Stumbling upon artificial intelligence was supposed to happen Real Soon Now with Danny's thinking machines.

    Thinking Machines was the name Danny gave to his ambitious enterprise.

    True Artificial Intelligence proved far too hard for Danny Hillis and now he has gone on to less difficult challenges.

    Slashdot readers expect more from the Mind of an Inventor.

    1. Re:Mind of Mentifex by Flamefly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ignore the links to "True Artificial Intelligence" and "Stumbling upon" which link to Mentifex's web site.
      He is a troll of the AI community. Before you assign him informative mod points for links to his own useless work, please read the following page http://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html

    2. Re:Mind of Mentifex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connection Machines were never great supercomputers. The best use of Connection Machine hardware has been as movie props -- War Games and Jurassic Park for example. More proof: What was Danny's next gig after Thinking Machines -- Disney fellow!

  17. Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Plammox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of contributing to the overall noise level, why not research an effective noise cancellation solution? I realize that they're not completely effective, but they ought to be able to muffle the noise somewhat to the point that your noise blends in with the background noise of a thousands mouse clicks and Windows ding sounds.

    1. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think AC's cube neighbor in http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164088 &cid=13703034 has the solution to that.

    2. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Znork · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, there are _very_ effective noise cancellation solutions.

      They're called 'walls', and come in a variety of efficiency levels.

      However, they're probably not 'hip' enough for todays corporate interior designers, and they may not be patentable, which makes this solution a more desireable one for the interested parties.

    3. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have one better. VNC to a coworker's machine, and start a Rap/Hip Hop/Death Metal play list on his/her workstation with the volume cranked all the way up. Pick a different victim for each phone call, and people will too busy playing "whack-a-mole" with whatever is blasting the din to listen in on your conversation.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the Cone of Silence

    5. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by JulianOolian · · Score: 1

      However, they're probably not 'hip' enough for todays corporate interior designers

      I think the problem is they're a bit too 'permanent' for today's corporate building managers.

    6. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Prune · · Score: 1

      Dumbass, noise cancellation doesn't work throughout space, it's strictly localized. That's why you have noise cancelling headphones, but no noise cancelling speaker systems (at least not ones that are not restricted to specific 'sweet spots').
      Noise cancelling can only be throughout space if both the speaker and noise source had the same location -- clearly a ludicrous setup. Otherwise, what you get is both areas of cancellation and areas of reinforcement. Try this: draw two sound sources with equidistant concentric circles centered on them. At locations where the circles (or empty areas) intersect, you get reinforcement; at locations where circles intersect empty areas, you get cancellation. You can see the same thing better by throwing two pebbles in a pond.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    7. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Just because something isn't achievable with conventional technology today, doesn't have to mean it's forever impossible. Isn't your attitude a bit like "640kb is all a user will ever need"? All I'm saying is that the development direction of the product in quesiton is wrong. Keep the Billisms coming... ;)

    8. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Prune · · Score: 1

      This is not a technological restriction but a physical one. You can't change the physics of how sound waves propagate through air and how waves interfere with each other anymore than you can change the speed of light.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    9. Re:Active noise cancellation anyone?? by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Changing the laws of physics and whether or not complete active noise cancellation is possible for a cubicle is not the issue!

      1) The invention of a device which adds to the overall noise level in the office is clearly headed down the wrong development path. Agree? Good.
      2) All I'm saying is that while complete noise cancellation may not be possible for a cubicle size volume, what would it take to enable it??? Clearly, as you also state, there are laws of physics which would make the conventional point-oriented noise cancellation ...well, erm.. pointless... for a problem like this. Why shouldn't we think a little out of the box? Where's the inventor in you?

      I can't believe that a partial, workable active noise cancellation solution (from the point of hearing of the surrounding cubicles) is impossible without proving it first (Mind you: textbooks on wave propagation don't count).

      Peace.

  18. Bahhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can do this already after a fifth of gin

    =)

    1. Re:Bahhh by Durrok · · Score: 1

      Would make playing rock music at work really interesting... talk about subliminal messaging ;)

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
  19. Prior Art by 3D-nut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Kissinger's memoirs, White House Years, he describes how he and others, probably Nixon included, while in Moscow for a summit meeting, brought along a device I believe he called "the babbler", which was a tape player that played the sounds of many people speaking or maybe splices of babble. Then they could converse in their presumably bugged living quarters while playing the babbler. Kissinger wrote that it became intolerable after a while, it was so distracting.

    1. Re:Prior Art by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Kissinger wrote that it became intolerable after a while, it was so distracting.

      So it was Kissenger who blanked out those tapes!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  20. as a helldesk worker.. by hookedup · · Score: 1

    most of my conversations with people might as well be in jibberish..

  21. It wouldn't have worked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Russians had so may bugging devices in the US embassy they could have used the difference in mike locations to filter by position of sound source.

  22. Blablabla by halleluja · · Score: 0

    Been using ViaVoice on /. for ages..

  23. Increase privacy? by Cyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No - increase headaches.

    I thought it was going to be a cone of silence like device, where it could cut down on outside distractions - maybe some white noise generation. A cone of silence type device.

    Nope, it's a damned chatterbox. I can't imagine anyone who would want to hear random snippets of themselves while talking on the phone, talk about totally breaking your train of thought.

    If you need privacy while speaking in your cubicle, you can just as easily leave your cubicle and use either a cellphone or another phone to have that privacy. If you're really talking about company secrets at work and your coworkers *shouldn't* be overhearing, go petition to your boss to get a real office, because you shouldn't have to be the one to find some crazy solution to what should be a nonissue. If it's personal, then pop out to break and actually deal with it, instead of muffled tones that waste more time than you need to spend, and distract everyone else around you whether they want to listen in or not.

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  24. A little skeptical... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    I'd have to see how it works in real-life to really judge, but I'm not sure how well it'd really work.

    I know every time I hear myself with a delay while I talk (a friend's cell phone has time-delay feedback, bad speaker/mic config on teamspeak), I have a hard time talking. Hearing my own voice while I try to talk is ~confusing~, and results in me having to concentrate to say what I need to say.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  25. The perfect gift for Usama by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    In the Bin cave or 6 star resort. Meeting the CIA or just chatting about the next "marriage" or "game". The perfect gift for any man on a mission.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  26. 5 for delivery to washington, stat! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    Of course, planting one of these in The Oval Office would produce perfectly intelligable speechy for someone standing outside. We live in hope.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  27. Conference room prank by amigabill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone else think it'd be fun to hide this in the conference room hooked up to the speakerphone?

  28. I need the opposite by bitflip · · Score: 1

    I'd like something that converts the unintelligible babble of my coworkers into something coherent. Productivity would skyrocket!

  29. And it's not distracting to the user? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article says:

    "As promised, when the speakers play a scrambled version of your voice, your real conversation can't be understood by someone standing even four feet away. (In tests by NEWSWEEK, no one wanted to stand four feet away, because the chatter from those boxes was anything but soothing.)"

    What the article doesn't say is how the chatter from those boxes affects the person talking on the phone. I'm prepared to believe that it doesn't irritate the user him-or-herself, but I'm from Missouri, you've got to show me.

    Or at least show me some convincing testimony from Newsweek reporters!

  30. Invention Needs Cubicles by infonography · · Score: 1

    Security; Badges are required at all times and without the warm Semi-privacy of a Cubicle and the wise but stern support of a middle manager, geeks cannot invent anything worthwhile.

    Company Cafeteria food; while bland is meets your nutritional needs, It's a single cell protein combined with synthetic aminos, vitamins, and minerals. Everything the body needs. Do you know what it really reminds me of? Tasty Wheat. Did you ever eat Tasty Wheat?

    Mandated clothng choices; Pressed white shirt and simple black tie. Simple Jackets needed, your rank does requires them.

    On Time Policy [OTP]; This company is one of the top software companies in the world because every single employee understands that they are part of a whole. Thus if an employee has a problem, the company has a problem.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  31. It works wonderfully! by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

    One day, I was talking to a friend on the phone and said the F-word. Later that day I was talking to my mother and said the word "Nuns".

    During a private conversation, the speakers above my cubicle spouted out "F**K NUNS"...

    My privacy has never been more complete!

  32. Useless to me since I'm deaf by lemkebeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    :shrugs:

    Useless to me since I'm deaf and use a TTY anyway. A TTY is a text based telecommunications device that works over a phone line. You can buy software TTY's though they aren't as good as the hardware.

    Kind of hard to overhear a TTY since it isn't verbal. :grins: One of the few advantages of being deaf, that and not hearing some of what you don't want to.

    1. Re:Useless to me since I'm deaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "voice" didn't you understand? Sometimes I wonder if disabled people even know they are "disabled".

  33. Applied Minds.. by Create+an+Account · · Score: 1

    ...That's a real nice website they've got there. Yes sir, real nice.

  34. While holding a normal conversation on the phone Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice which makes your conversation practically unintelligible to people as close as 4 feet away.


    Finally! A way to do away with Rosie O'Donnel and Barbara Streisand! Send 'em some of these, free.
    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  35. Unbabble ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A machine that does the exact opposite would be much more useful: Translate the meaningless babble that is produced by some people (mostly managers) into coherent, meaningful talk.

    1. Re:Unbabble ? by GameSlave · · Score: 1

      you don't need a machine for that.. 5 grams of hallucinogenic mushrooms will work just as well.

      --
      God Curse America.
  36. The cheaper solution by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Cubes are mostly echo proof as it is. There's no need for an eletronic device to mask the contents of your personal calls.

    Instead, why not raise the height of the standard 5'6" cube walls with 7 or 8 foot. Then put a roof and door on it. Voila - problem solved.

    I suspect the reason we don't do this is because a 7x7x7 cubicle would be a bit too much like a cocoon. As a cubicle dweller I'd say you don't have to provide me with anything but overhead bins. Then I'll sling my hamock in and enjoy my day.

  37. Revolutionary! by cremes · · Score: 1

    This is going to revolutionize politics!

  38. This is a really bad idea! by lwriemen · · Score: 1

    Increasing the noise level in the average office workspace will only decrease the productivity. For details, see Peopleware by DeMarco & Lister ISBN 0-932633-43-9.

    Here's an even better idea, office with a door!

  39. It's kind of funny ... by lwriemen · · Score: 1

    ... that this company wants inventors who are willing to relocate. If nothing else, innovation requires comfort. It's too bad such a company can't be innovative about telecommuting. ;-)

    1. Re:It's kind of funny ... by oneiros27 · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      Nonetheless, he insists that "people tend to overestimate the individual inventor and underestimate the system that makes their inventions real."
      So, if the system is important, they either have to bring the system to the telecommuter, or bring the employee to the system.

      I find that a lot of my more create solutions aren't something that I come up with in a vaccuum, but come from talking to other people. (and it may just be that something that I say to them, explaining the nature of the problem, triggers me to think of a better solution, while othertimes, they ask questions to make me think of the problem differently)

      Yes, it sucks to relocate, but I could see the need to want people to become part of the system.
      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  40. More then just Babble by NousCS · · Score: 1

    In addition to describing interesting "Babble" devices the linked article from the posting talks about another interesting device that allows the user to change satellite views on a table-top by putting your hands on the table and spreading them, you zoom into a region, a city, a neighborhood. You can also slide your hand over the table to expose the view as captured at an earlier time. Even more interesting is that the surface of the table rises to create a model of the actual terrain.

    As a sophomore in Computer Science everything was very abstract and really not as interesting as I had hoped. After reading Hillis' book The Pattern on the Stone my interest was renewed. The book presents Computer Science ideas in a more physical manner and I found my interest renewed (even if I still had to deal with professors that had died inside theirselves but continued teaching). The best comparison I can make is to Feynman's "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!": Adventures of a Curious Character.

    1. Re:More then just Babble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My co-worker is developing that now. I worked on the 20 million pixel display that displays satellite imagery creating a map over 12 feet wide by using 20 projectors mosaic together.

  41. Mentifex deserves a hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Before you blindly accept the idea that "Mentifex is a troll of the AI community" read the following page(s):

    http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/307824.307853
    ACM Sigplan Notices 33(12):25-31 Mind.Forth: Thoughts on AI and Forth

    http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1052883.1052885
    ACM Sigplan Notices 39(12):11-16 Forth and AI Revisited: BRAIN.FORTH

    http://www.sl4.org/archive/0205/3829.html

    http://pub.ufasta.edu.ar/ohcop/curso2003/27-Activi dad12.ppt

    http://books.iuniverse.com/viewgiftoc.asp?isbn=059 5654371&page=1

    1. Re:Mentifex deserves a hearing by Flamefly · · Score: 1

      Please note this anonymous poster is likely Mentifex himself.

      Regarding the ACM Sigplan Notices, please read this note: (taken from http://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html


      2.3.2 What about the SIGPLAN review?

      Another document Murray often uses to bolster the credibility of his project is a review of Mind.Forth which appeared in the Association for Computing Machinerys SIGPLAN Notices [3]. Murray is either unaware or unwilling to admit that the SIGPLAN Notices is an informal, unrefereed, and largely unedited publication of the ACMs special interest group on programming languages (of which Murrays project is not one). The newsletter is written neither by nor for AI specialists, and in any case the reviews appearing therein do not represent the official opinions of ACM or SIGPLAN. The author of the article in question, Paul Frenger, is not a computer scientist, but rather a practising medical doctor who writes a monthly column for enthusiasts of the Forth programming language.


      As for the Powerpoint presentation and the book, they're both written by Mentifex himself, so it does little to provide support to his arguments.

      Which leaves just the SL4 posting, but alas, the poster himself has clarified his position (again taken from http://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html


      2.3.1 What about the Ben Goertzel endorsement?

      Murray often includes in his signature a link to an archived e-mail from scholar Ben Goertzel [4]. This letter, posted to the SL4 mailing list, contains an informal review of the documents posted on Murrays website. The tone is generally neutral, except for the last paragraph, where Goertzel remarks that Murrays ideas are significantly better than most of what passes for cognitive science and AI.

      What Murray neglects to mention is a subsequent retraction of sorts by Goertzel. After another list participant pointed out that Murrays theory and writing was at best highly derivative and at worst fundamentally flawed, Goertzel conceded these points [6]. In another post, Goertzel says he does not dispute that Mentifex is a crackpot project, and remarks that the claims that its creator makes for it are far out of proportion to its actual achievements. [5]

      On 31 March 2004, Goertzel wrote the author of this FAQ to clarify his current stance on Murrays work. His full opinion is as follows:

      At the present time, I have not studied Mentifexs theories on AI carefully enough to have a definite opinion on them. I have spent only a few hours reading through his writings, which is not enough to absorb such a mass of ideas, particularly since Mentifexs communication style is confusing at times (though very clear and crisp at times as well). I like some of his ideas and dont like others. I dont like his way of advertising himself and his ideas, which admittedly becomes annoying, and seems absurd at times. I like quite a few of his philosophical ideas. And I really dont like the assumption that just because someone lacks official credentials, and presents or promotes their ideas in socially unusual ways, their ideas are not worth investigating or evaluating. My prior statement that Mentifexs work is more interesting than most work in the AI field was not intended as an instance of extreme praise: rather, my opinion is that most work in the AI field is embarrassingly unambitious and boring. Even if a lot of Mentifexs ideas are wrong (which may or may not be the case), at least Mentifex appears to be making a genuine effort to understand the mind as a whole, rather than (like many AI researchers) shying away from the big questions and retreating into the pursuit of minor technical questions of no possible practical or theoretical utility. I admit that Mentifex has many aspects in common with well-known crackpots, but I also think that the line between crackpots and maverick scientists is not as clearly drawn as

  42. The mind of The President: +1, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Dear /dot:

    I don't need one of those contraptions. My conversations are naturally convoluted.

    Regardz,
    George W. Bush, President Of The United Gulags Of America

    1. Re:The mind of The President: +1, Patriotic by yourfnmom · · Score: 1



      Yer doin' a heckuva job Brownie... Now, watch mah swing!

  43. Already Use It by danheretic · · Score: 1
    While holding a normal conversation on the phone Babble plays back random meaningless snipits of your own voice
    I just do this manually. No external device needed. Makes for entertaining phone calls too.
  44. Tourett syndrom by Mugros · · Score: 1

    Watch *shit* those words that *asshole* you record onto that *Microsoft* machine.

  45. Examples please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday's fire in the break room led to the bankruptcy of the coffee till. Any more harassment of the group's admin assistant will surely lead to layoffs...a situation pregnant with terror.

  46. Illegitimis Non Carborundum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Flamefly wrote:
    So, to the anonymous poster who obviously is Mentifex, try again. If you believe your work has scientific usefulness, then submit a peer reviewed paper and let it take care of itself, no need for you to continuing trolling the Internet, think of the time you'd save! Almost makes you wonder why you haven't. It's pointless to continue to push your views, and in this case to try to back it up with baseless arguments, too many people know you for what you are!
    Flamefly, the Mentifex AI project is a multi-pronged endeavor.

    Propagating the Theory of Mind is the prime objective.

    Coding the Artificial Mind serves the prime objective above.

    Spreading AI Memes on the Net, useless as it may seem to your eminent self, O Lord of the Flameflies, serves such purposes as attracting other AI coders to the True AI enterprise and shoring up the personal motivation-structure for a lifelong AI project.

    So back off and give a sincere independent investigator an even chance. It's easy for you to say, "submit a peer reviewed paper" -- but which comes first, the chicken (lots of peer-reviewed papers on Mentifex AI); or the egg (Mentifex kick-starting the thaw of the AI Winter right here on Slashdot)?

    So the troll label sucks.

    1. Re:Illegitimis Non Carborundum by Flamefly · · Score: 1

      Once again, don't post anonymously, if you're Mentifex, just say, if you're not, why not stand up for him?

      Yes it's easy for me to say "submit a peer reviewed paper" because it *is* that simple. It may take many years for it to be leave the iterations or revisions and reviews but the sooner he starts on the path, the sooner the finish line arrives. If his work has scientific usefulness it needs to be proven so the wider community can learn and extend. Merely trolling the Internet pushing his personal belief achieves nothing.

      If the work builds on other solid ideas, the paper can refer to these and help to extend into other areas. If the work is entirely new, the paper can start by pointing out the errors in the work of others *with testable examples* and why his system best maps reality. The AI machine which has been promised "real soon" for almost the last decade really doesn't count!

      The problem is this will never happen, because Mentifex will fall at the first hurdle and his theories be disproven. So rather he wanders around the Internet aimlessly promoting himself, a vicious circle that will lead to no education or enlightenment to himself or others. The only welcome side-effect is it is quite amusing for new people to stumble across, at least for a while.

      The comment subject line made me smile, so thank you for that at least.

  47. Just wondering... by mikael · · Score: 1

    I'm curious - how do these boxes decide to become active? Do they require to be activated manually or do they detect human speech automatically? If so, it would be be fun to fill a room full of these devices and just let them run wild.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  48. H1B and L-1 Visa Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to the increase in the amount of H1B and L-1 Visa workers, most of the sound comming from your co-workers cube is all babble anyway.....so for most high tech workers, this device is useless.

  49. This would be fun to play tricks on people. by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    Just hook it up while someone is gone or not paying attention and disguise it in a plant or something like that. Imagine their surprise when the plan starts "Babbling" back to them. LOL! I work in a rather stuffy office, this is just what someone would need to liven things up a bit!

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
    1. Re:This would be fun to play tricks on people. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Just hook it up while someone is gone or not paying attention and disguise it in a plant or something like that. Imagine their surprise when the plan starts "Babbling" back to them.

      I don't know why Mel dove out the window. He had just gotten back from medical leave for a nervous breakdown, and was taking a call...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  50. Exactly... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    It is amazing that businesses cannot figure out that cubicles are a complete and utter failure. Whats worse is that companies then decide to put employees who do not have the mental capability to think if there is any noise in the room in this environment. This leads to the mentally deficent to consistantly complain because the guy in the cube next to them is having a conversation.

    Walls, solve this problem. Those with problems thinking can have their quite, and those that do not can have their noise. Everyone is more productive.

    1. Re:Exactly... by lahvak · · Score: 1

      As most of the workers don't have mental capability to think anyway, why waste money for walls?

      --
      AccountKiller
  51. Medical tool by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    This could also help in finding and diagnosing early schyzophrenia in people! or making them believe they are!

    Add a voice modulator and a reverse voice setup and you may make them believe they are possessed.

  52. Another step closer to THX 1138 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automated voices talking to us on phones, buses, trains, other public places and spaces. Now this.

    Time to shave my head bald and start wearing all white.

  53. With tweaking, not a bad idea... by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    For starters, the speakers should send out a audio cancellation on the user's voice, and put the "babble" out in a low, quiet volume level. "Babble" parts should probably be soft sounds, so that to an obvserver, it sounds like a low murmur of activity.

    The feedback of voice from a cube is nice, because it alerts others not to disturb a phone conversation. Keeping it low, combined with the audio cancellation, should provide ample protection against eavesdroppers, without disturbing the surrounding cubicles.

    If the effect is done right, an overt attempt to listen should be met with a profound confusion and maybe even be a little disturbing to the listener trying to understand it. To anyone else int he office, it should just be a little more background noise (Less distracting because of the chosen tones and the fact that the human brain should not pick up the conversation due to unrecognizable "words").

    It would be interesting to listen to a recording of the tests.

  54. Subliminal messaging by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I once had a background program that did something like that... except that at random intervals, it would take over the keyboard and type messages. ^_^ Took my co-worker a while to figure out what was going wrong.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  55. I remember reading by mtibbitts · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about a product that does the same, except that it produced a white noise that made eavesdropping difficult. Sounds like the same goal and result...without the mindless chatter. Martin Tibbitts

    1. Re:I remember reading by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, take an empty sardines can and put it in the sink so that the water from the faucet falls on the half open lid...

      --
      AccountKiller
  56. And what company in their right mind...? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    And what company in their right mind is going to allow this? It's a cute technical solution that inserts even more noise into the workspace. Like many cute technical solutions, were these people even thinking of what the real world impact would be? Or do they just have the tunnel vision of, Hey, it works and solves the immediate problem. What more is required?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  57. Other related reactive sound technologies... by C+A+S+S+I+E+L · · Score: 1
    ...are presented

    (I worked on the audio masking algorithms for prototypes of this system. It's pretty much all written in Max/MSP. Here's a shot of the prototype rigs.)

  58. Pffft. by modecx · · Score: 1

    Heck, that sounds like the voices in my head. I'd claim prior art, but I'd probably be sued by my company for keeping my voices to myself. Stupid company, stupid voic... We'll show em!

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  59. So now if everyone in the office uses Babble... by Cincan · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the amount of noise in the office could double?

  60. Even better... by Chris+Spencer · · Score: 1

    There is a great program called SoundTimer that plays random keystrokes and mouse clicks out of your PC speakers. Makes it sound like you're working really hard :D

    --
    SoundTimer makes you sound busy.
  61. Random Snippets by tomzyk · · Score: 1
    Sometimes I wonder if /. uses this "random meaningless snippet generator" already.

    Here's the quote at the bottom of my /. window right now:
    Barbie says, Take quaaludes in gin and go to a disco right away! But Ken says, WOO-WOO!! No credit at "Mr. Liquor"!!

    --
    Karma: NaN
  62. Sorry, done already by waamaral · · Score: 1

    I've read about it in some Harry Potter book.

    --
    What, do I need a sig now?
  63. next after "Babble".... by megify · · Score: 1

    will be "Babblefish" - which will translate your garbled conversation back!!

  64. Simpler solution by lamonml · · Score: 1

    I've found that a fart machine works just as well. Give it a couple loud blasts, and everybody in earshot is laughing too loudly to pay attention to what you're saying.

    Maybe that solution's too juvenile to work in most offices, but it's certainly fun for all.

  65. How this would really work by tryone · · Score: 1

    Shortly after switching "Babble" on, no-one will be able to hear your phone conversations. This is because you won't be making any phone conversations; instead you'll be laying face-down in the nearest ER being asked how those speakers got there.

  66. Invere Square Law by phliar · · Score: 1
    It may work if you put the device near one corner and you have your conversation at the other corner.
    Assume the loudness of the babble speaker is about the same as that of your voice. If the speaker is 3 feet from your head, and the phone microphone is 1 inch from your mouth, that's a ratio of 1/36. Now square that. You get .00077 -- that's how much quieter the babble will be. (Furthermore, phone mikes are usually set up so that ambient noise hits both sides of the diaphragm and gets cancelled out, but your voice only hits one side so is picked up.)

    If Bubba's in the next cube (or a few cubes away) your voice and the babble are approximately the same distance away, and will sound equally loud.

    And how come no one has mentioned The Cone of Silence?

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  67. This is very OLD news! by jackintime · · Score: 1

    I guess the nerds here and at Newsweek don't get out much. Applied Minds and Babble, their product for Herman Miller, were featured in a June 21st Wired News article (http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,67951 ,00.html). It was subsequently featured on a couple of TV news magazine shows where the demo was somewhat underwhelming....

  68. Applied Minds? http://tinyurl.com/8vbk8 by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0

    A new device encourages rapid employee turnover... A new way to shove people into forming their own corporation and working at home. Perhaps there really will be an "ownership society" after all. Hey! George W. Bush is a Prophet. He knew all along; he knew. What did he know? hahaha He knew when we "applied our minds" to the problem, we would succeed. http://tinyurl.com/8vbk8 . Wow! Applying the ol' human brain! What a rush. Makes me want to run out an hold a sign at th' street corner admitting I invent stuff.

  69. has limitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously cannot configure a web server / internet connection that won't get slashdotted.

  70. Rats, foiled again by bvwj · · Score: 1

    Now this, just after I got my cones of silence working.

    --
    You can mod me down, but you cannot call me a coward.