is it possible to obey the law? will police get all over you just for not slamming on your brakes when a light turns red? can I hit someone over the head, drag them into a warehouse, chain them up, and fuck them with a dagger? If I kill someone, will the police not just give up after 5 minutes of looking for me? Are acciidents persistent? Can I completely eliminate the prostitute population of the city? If I start killing all the taxi drivers, will the taxi drivers stay home? Will all the various murders which are just too fucking easy to pull off in vice city be harder to do en-masse?
I want a game that will let me kill people, but will beat me down if I dont do it clean!
No, seriously. Like Quake. I dont know of any non-game examples and id did the right thing when they released their code. "We arent planning on profitting from this anymore, so here, it's free. Not all of it (we retain the copywrite on the characters and concepts), but the code, we got no reason to keep it secret."
the word "Terrorist" is REALLY overused. "Are you a terrorist?" "No, I'm going to blow up my school for purely non-political reasons" Then pee on them.
Couldnt they have talked to Swatch or something? Why the hell should a running shoe need a battery? I mean, that's the whole point.. you RUN in them! Kinetic energy, right there! FREE for the taking!
when everyone has this kind of thing available to them, I really hope public awareness about donating your unused proccessing time is raised. It could be in the form of little cards sitting next to new computers- "This system is so fast and powerful that rather than you waiting for it to finish what it is doing, it may spend most of its time waiting for you instead! Why not give it something to do with its free time? Please take one of these free CDs containing information and software which can be used to help avance science, medicine, or meaningless wank-jobs like key breaking. All that is required to help is for you to install the project which intrests you most, the computer will do the rest!" or something
You don't get it. "If you don't like it, don't use it" is such a horrible defense, and yet it is spouted often enough to be sickening. For the most part, we aren't using it. This doesnt change that it is horrible. We would love for it not to suck. That would be great. The Gimp's UI shows a blatant disregard for all input from those who have been complaining for years. What incentive is there to help out by donating to a project which obviously doesnt consider making a project which is the least bit usable a high priority? At least you didnt say "If you dont like it, change it yourself!" which I hear far too much. Nobody expects you to get off your ass and do something about it, but if I sit down to eat and you serve me crap on a plate, expect some type of complaint before I leave. Especially when you say "This is free dinner 2.0! I know you hated it before but this is better!"
I'd say it is bashing, but don't give bashing a bad name. It's not just for kicks. The Gimp has too many followers who will swear it's better than photoshop. It _DESERVES_ a good, well-written and (for the most part) accurate bashing-the-fuck out of it. The gimp is a great tool, but I'd certainly never use it for anything I use photoshop for.
this has been posted by an AC already, but posting as AC is stupid. It's "another THINK coming", otherwise it would be "if they thing they can do this to me.. they've got another thing coming!" and that doesnt make sense.
That's quite different from downloading the episodes online with all the ads stripped out. Ignoring an ad is fine, but using technology to see that you never get the opportunity to ignore something, that's just wrong. Any time you decide not to follow the model which the content-providers have chosen to follow, you're being dishonest. I'm not saying "It's theft!" or "What you're doing is illegal!", but if you use technology to ensure that you never have the opportunity to follow the model, you have no business looking at the content provided by that model. Basically: "It's not a crime, but you're still an asshole"
I really wish everyone thought the way you did. Perhaps some standard can be developed where a browser can have an option: "I dont want to see any ads" and from then on it would start sending along with its HTTP headers: Advertising: NoThanks
and then honest people like you could be redirected to a page that says "Sorry, we only want you to see this if you see advertising as well", and you could go on about your business.
yeah, the ability to watch extended ads remind me a lot of ads which are so small as to not be seen at all. Editors: PLEASE STOP ACCEPTING THESE STORIES. Discourage these idiotic comments! Give me an option to view stories WITHOUT stupid comments!
is it possible to obey the law?
will police get all over you just for not slamming on your brakes when a light turns red?
can I hit someone over the head, drag them into a warehouse, chain them up, and fuck them with a dagger?
If I kill someone, will the police not just give up after 5 minutes of looking for me?
Are acciidents persistent?
Can I completely eliminate the prostitute population of the city?
If I start killing all the taxi drivers, will the taxi drivers stay home?
Will all the various murders which are just too fucking easy to pull off in vice city be harder to do en-masse?
I want a game that will let me kill people, but will beat me down if I dont do it clean!
who the fuck buys a new CD more than once a week?
No, seriously. Like Quake. I dont know of any non-game examples and id did the right thing when they released their code. "We arent planning on profitting from this anymore, so here, it's free. Not all of it (we retain the copywrite on the characters and concepts), but the code, we got no reason to keep it secret."
On the other hand, it's good to release once-prioprietary software as open source when you don't plan on using it anymore. You know, like Quake.
perhaps you dont understand what an "installer" is meant to do. Linux asks for my root password when I install something too, you know.
It's simple that this guy is an idiot, and this isnt even close to being news worthy. It isnt even a very good TROLL.
From the other posts I'm reading (I dont know personally), it seems that Gnumeric isn't on the chart because Gnumeric can't do charts :)
the word "Terrorist" is REALLY overused.
"Are you a terrorist?" "No, I'm going to blow up my school for purely non-political reasons"
Then pee on them.
Couldnt they have talked to Swatch or something? Why the hell should a running shoe need a battery? I mean, that's the whole point.. you RUN in them! Kinetic energy, right there! FREE for the taking!
when everyone has this kind of thing available to them, I really hope public awareness about donating your unused proccessing time is raised. It could be in the form of little cards sitting next to new computers-
"This system is so fast and powerful that rather than you waiting for it to finish what it is doing, it may spend most of its time waiting for you instead! Why not give it something to do with its free time? Please take one of these free CDs containing information and software which can be used to help avance science, medicine, or meaningless wank-jobs like key breaking. All that is required to help is for you to install the project which intrests you most, the computer will do the rest!"
or something
You don't get it. "If you don't like it, don't use it" is such a horrible defense, and yet it is spouted often enough to be sickening.
For the most part, we aren't using it. This doesnt change that it is horrible.
We would love for it not to suck. That would be great.
The Gimp's UI shows a blatant disregard for all input from those who have been complaining for years. What incentive is there to help out by donating to a project which obviously doesnt consider making a project which is the least bit usable a high priority?
At least you didnt say "If you dont like it, change it yourself!" which I hear far too much.
Nobody expects you to get off your ass and do something about it, but if I sit down to eat and you serve me crap on a plate, expect some type of complaint before I leave. Especially when you say "This is free dinner 2.0! I know you hated it before but this is better!"
I'd say it is bashing, but don't give bashing a bad name. It's not just for kicks. The Gimp has too many followers who will swear it's better than photoshop. It _DESERVES_ a good, well-written and (for the most part) accurate bashing-the-fuck out of it.
The gimp is a great tool, but I'd certainly never use it for anything I use photoshop for.
Miliary -> Industry -> Consumer
You are here --^
^-- We are awaiting this one
this has been posted by an AC already, but posting as AC is stupid. It's "another THINK coming", otherwise it would be "if they thing they can do this to me.. they've got another thing coming!"
and that doesnt make sense.
That's quite different from downloading the episodes online with all the ads stripped out.
Ignoring an ad is fine, but using technology to see that you never get the opportunity to ignore something, that's just wrong.
Any time you decide not to follow the model which the content-providers have chosen to follow, you're being dishonest. I'm not saying "It's theft!" or "What you're doing is illegal!", but if you use technology to ensure that you never have the opportunity to follow the model, you have no business looking at the content provided by that model.
Basically: "It's not a crime, but you're still an asshole"
Congratulations, you completely missed the point. I have to say, re-reading my post, that such is quite an achievement.
I really wish everyone thought the way you did. Perhaps some standard can be developed where a browser can have an option: "I dont want to see any ads" and from then on it would start sending along with its HTTP headers:
Advertising: NoThanks
and then honest people like you could be redirected to a page that says "Sorry, we only want you to see this if you see advertising as well", and you could go on about your business.
and, I think I do...
No matter what you try, the only way to make anyone happy is going to involve lots of dominating sex.
Uhm... way to waste your modpoints.
Uhm.. anybody else.. click "images"? :)
errm...
"overrated" works just as well
yeah, the ability to watch extended ads remind me a lot of ads which are so small as to not be seen at all. Editors: PLEASE STOP ACCEPTING THESE STORIES. Discourage these idiotic comments! Give me an option to view stories WITHOUT stupid comments!
adjective, you dick.
(mods: you dont have to mod my post as "troll" or "flamebait", it really isnt. It's just "unfunny".)
yes.
Remember that, in no uncertain terms, things like this are exactly why we have the right to bear arms. Shoot the fuckers in the head, NOW.
Maybe your flaw is in the "I'll do it for him"
Because you have squat to do with this.
It was intended for him, not you.
A message which uses pronouns and yet only applies to specific people? Unheard of!