How do you deal with entities that aren't physically located where you live?
There's no amazon place of business in australia, but I buy stuff from them all the time. I'm pretty sure that ebay australia doesn't have a local presence in my home city, and there's definitely no valve place of business here. How do I exchange certs physically with these entities without flying to sydney or to america?
All hardware sucks and all software sucks. The difference that has to be weighed up is wether the applications/data are going to fail less and is going to be more recoverable if it's hosted in the cloud than if it's hosted locally. If the business has the time, the human and monetary capital and the equipment to be more reliable, with more access to the data than if it's hosted in the cloud, then there's no reason to host in the cloud. However, for the price/performance/reliability offered nowadays the cloud is hard to beat when all those factors are taken into consideration.
You wouldn't happen to have any pics online, would you? I always like to see people's racks to see if they're worse or better than mine - usually better, but i live in hope.
Yes, they did learn to live off the land - because the alternative was extinction. Too honourable to tell us? Really? Define how they are more "honourable" than those of us who don't have black skin and were born in australia.
Sure, a westerner would starve unless shown where to look - just as an aboriginal would starve unless shown where to look by it's elders - they don't magically soak up knowledge because their skin is black.
Metal workers in japan and china worked out how to use carbon in it's different forms to manipulate the types of steel produced, but they also refused to spread the knowledge and technology - they deliberately kept it to themselves.
The titanic sinking was not because of a failure of knowledge of chemistry - it was a business and political decision to sail early while the ship was still being fitted (missing critical gaskets), stupidity on the part of the captain to use an area with icebergs reported, a decision to go full speed in said area, and an inability to realise that compartmentalising a ship requires no gaps be left between ceiling and walls.
Then again, I don't remember too many japanese ships of steel on the waters around the time the british launched the titanic.
Printers can range all the way to multi hundreds of thousands of dollars, all communicating via ip (level 3 and 4). My brother $200 networked printer is networked, and it wouldn't care if it was behind a router or not as long as everything went where it was supposed to go. As for subnets, you could stick it in a/29, and if it's private ip space it doesn't matter a whit about wasting a subnet or three.
Really? Printer Router Rest of the network is going to work fine. You might have to put the printer onto a different subnet, but I'm not seeing any issues here.
I understand where you're coming from, but if they were concerns about those then the convoys would go from the checkpoint into a sheltered bay where they would be inspected/challenged, and then let through. I doubt they did a check for guns, because they would have noticed the guy dressed as osama, along with a lack of bodyguards. It's a big embaressment for the police.
(realistically, there's no way bush's convoy would be stopped, ever. the checkpoints and convoy would be in radio contact, and they'd just be waved through).
No, it does not make sense. The further bad guys get in the more freedom they have to do something. You stop all you can in the outer ring, restricting movement as much as possible.
If the enemy can view their attempt at being stopped, it means they haven't got close to what's being protected. It doesn't matter in this case what the checkpoint was made of, everything should have been stopped and accounted for, and that hasn't happened here at all.
Slashdot Mirror
How do you deal with entities that aren't physically located where you live?
There's no amazon place of business in australia, but I buy stuff from them all the time. I'm pretty sure that ebay australia doesn't have a local presence in my home city, and there's definitely no valve place of business here. How do I exchange certs physically with these entities without flying to sydney or to america?
All hardware sucks and all software sucks. The difference that has to be weighed up is wether the applications/data are going to fail less and is going to be more recoverable if it's hosted in the cloud than if it's hosted locally. If the business has the time, the human and monetary capital and the equipment to be more reliable, with more access to the data than if it's hosted in the cloud, then there's no reason to host in the cloud. However, for the price/performance/reliability offered nowadays the cloud is hard to beat when all those factors are taken into consideration.
Of course not. Same folder, different name.
Sure, i'll tell you - read the articles where it explains what happened and why (you were wrong, btw).
So, if given the right, who would they have voted for in the previous election?
awesome, thanks :)
You wouldn't happen to have any pics online, would you? I always like to see people's racks to see if they're worse or better than mine - usually better, but i live in hope.
Yes, they did learn to live off the land - because the alternative was extinction. Too honourable to tell us? Really? Define how they are more "honourable" than those of us who don't have black skin and were born in australia.
Sure, a westerner would starve unless shown where to look - just as an aboriginal would starve unless shown where to look by it's elders - they don't magically soak up knowledge because their skin is black.
Reading the document, it sounds like they are thinking of moving to plan-9 as the OS on the machines.
Actually a navy would work much better, what with all the sea stuff.
I guess the internet isn't intelligently designed.
Sure, that'll work wonders against spammers who are in another country. No, wait ..
You are totally right, to the point that i did a paper back in high school about that campaign.
Whoops.
Metal workers in japan and china worked out how to use carbon in it's different forms to manipulate the types of steel produced, but they also refused to spread the knowledge and technology - they deliberately kept it to themselves.
The titanic sinking was not because of a failure of knowledge of chemistry - it was a business and political decision to sail early while the ship was still being fitted (missing critical gaskets), stupidity on the part of the captain to use an area with icebergs reported, a decision to go full speed in said area, and an inability to realise that compartmentalising a ship requires no gaps be left between ceiling and walls.
Then again, I don't remember too many japanese ships of steel on the waters around the time the british launched the titanic.
Come see the violence inherent in the (beta) system!
For my 2 cents, the branding on my home gmail page is still all gmail beta.
You're absolutely wrong. Nothing much has changed at all.
The british invaded new zealand, although not with total success.
Everyone bloats numbers to promote an agenda, from governments to individuals to corner stores.
Printers can range all the way to multi hundreds of thousands of dollars, all communicating via ip (level 3 and 4). My brother $200 networked printer is networked, and it wouldn't care if it was behind a router or not as long as everything went where it was supposed to go. As for subnets, you could stick it in a /29, and if it's private ip space it doesn't matter a whit about wasting a subnet or three.
You could be doing vpn stuff, in which case it is. Either way, I'm not seeing how plugging a printer into a router is all-out 'wrong'.
Then again, my knowledge of routers etc could fill a thimble.
Really? Printer Router Rest of the network is going to work fine. You might have to put the printer onto a different subnet, but I'm not seeing any issues here.
More information: linky
I understand where you're coming from, but if they were concerns about those then the convoys would go from the checkpoint into a sheltered bay where they would be inspected/challenged, and then let through. I doubt they did a check for guns, because they would have noticed the guy dressed as osama, along with a lack of bodyguards. It's a big embaressment for the police.
(realistically, there's no way bush's convoy would be stopped, ever. the checkpoints and convoy would be in radio contact, and they'd just be waved through).
No, it does not make sense. The further bad guys get in the more freedom they have to do something. You stop all you can in the outer ring, restricting movement as much as possible.
If the enemy can view their attempt at being stopped, it means they haven't got close to what's being protected. It doesn't matter in this case what the checkpoint was made of, everything should have been stopped and accounted for, and that hasn't happened here at all.