Unless your residence has a specific place and manner restriction on someone using a bullhorn in front of your sidewalk
The Constitution doe not grant rights to citizens; it defines the limits of governmental powers. And although IANAL I'm quite sure that even if there were no noise ordinances in my neighborhood, I could get a judgement against someone with a bullhorn on the street by my house.
Yes, but the grandparent installs an ALPHA operating system and complains that it's buggy. WTF??? He needs to put that crack pipe away and get the hell away from the computer!
How is all of what you hear about Windows 7 news? The fact is that progress of any new version of any OS is news. Do you complain when there is news about an upcoming yet unreaeased Mac OS?
If you made the same comment about a Windows 7 news item you would have been modded flamebait (not by me, mind you; I'd mod it as "overrated").
I'm excited about the progress; I use Mandriva dual boot; of the distros I've tried, it's my favorite. I haven't tried Ubantu yet, but that's only because I've been happy with Mandriva.
Oddly, I'm posting this comment on IE in Windows =(
You have freedom of speech, not freedom to bother me. "Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins".
Your freedom of speech does not extend to standing on the sidewalk outside my residence with a bullhorn. My right to ignore you supercedes your right to speak.
I don't think Aubrey de Grey will live to see it, let alone me, but I can see a time when we will have nanorobots repairing our bodies cell by cell. Imagine figuring out how to put telomeraise back into chromosomes without causing cancer!
In fact I can see a time when everything you use will be made of interlocking nanorobots. No death, no want, in fact it may well be that we discover a way to reanimate formerly living cells; you will have all of the biblical prophesies of heaven on earth come true, thanks to scientific research.
Look at now compared to medevil times; you most likely live in far greater opulance than 10th century kings.
Seems I saw at least one study of carbon nanotubes in mice that showed that they were not problematic. And the summary's subject is, as usualy, misleadingly false. More true would be a headline "Nanomaterials Might Be More Dangerous Than We Think but then they might be safer".
Again, the Corporates shoot themselves in the feet with their own greed guns. The '00s are looking more and more like the 1920s, where thieves rule and the customer is an afterthought.
I think the answer to the question posed in the summary is a great big DUH!
Source for that joke: Mojo Nixon's Tie My Pecker To My Leg. He sings "I need a woman that's six feet ten, she gotta be that tall so's I can get it all in."
I presume you need a four foot tall or shorter woman or it's too loose?
That's part of the "pseudo" part. If I thought Barr had a snowball in hell's chance of winning I wouldn't vote for him, and if the Greens are on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win, and don't nominate anyone worse than Barr, I'll vote for them.
From the summary this seems to have a glaring drawback: it isn't Google. Yahoo search results are IMO quite inferior to Google's. Before Google I used infoseek, because it, too returned better results for me.
Google has let you use their search without restrictions almost since the beginning. When I had web sites I used Google for my site search, and a lot of big commercial sites do, too.
Why would you buy a Vega for the price of a Caddilac when the Caddilac gets better mileage?
It sure seems to have taken Yahoo a long time, too.
NOW you tell us! Where were you before the Iraq war? Gees, to think that the media shouldn't just publish corporate and government press releases before seeing if they had a shred of truth - what a concept! This will revolutionize news reporting!
If you publish the fact that it was published, then you are publishing facts. For example, if you say "George Bush is the anti-Christ" you are not publishing a fact, but if you say "Uncyclopedia says that George Bush is the anti-Christ" you are indeed publishing facts.
If your mainstream media newspaper quotes some kid's blog with attribution, then it is indeed publishing facts.
Reports say that Obama has a taste for kittens! What a devastating blow to his campaign! Surely he will lose ground in the animal rights voting bloc. We'll cover this next on our 3 hour special "Barack-uriosity Killed the Cat."
You've already admitted to an 'aversion to homosexuality', so obviously you're not going to have a lot of gay friends.
That's like "admitting" that my hair is gray. The aversion isn't to homosexuals, it's to homosexuality. The only time homosexuals bother me is when one hits on me.
Why, thank you:-)
I'm not exactly normal either. Heterosexual, but abnormal is a lot of ways. The thing about deformed animals wasn't a poke at anyone, just an illustration that sometimes a feature that makes an organism an evolutionary dead end keeps coming up. I'm not saying homosexuality is a "horrible deformity". A hairlip would be a horrible deformity. My oldest daughter's mental retardation is pretty bad; I'd rather she were gay than to be disabled as she is.
I wonder if you enjoy anal sex with your other-sex partners?
No. I did once with my ex-wife at her insistance, and couldn't keep an eraction.
How many people even use stereo mix? You record what's playing through your speakers. Any decent sound editing program is going to have some kind of mixer that will combine your recording with whatever you were playing along with.
My friend has a Dell, and for some reason you can't burn CDs with EAC on it. What we wind up doing when we're putting our LPs on CD is burn the.wav to CD as a data CD, then I take it home and burn it as a music CD. Oddly, his Dell will let you copy music CDs with no problem. So ironically, "fair use" is disabled while copyright infringement is not.
And unless by "speakers" you mean your guitar amp, if you are recording your speakers with a microphone you're doing it wrong. See an article I posted on K5 a few years ago, How to rip from vinyl or tape.
Dell is not the only one that distributes drivers that disable stereo mix. Lenovo has these problems too
So if Ford Crown Victorias explode when hit in the rear, it's OK for Chevy to make exploding cars? Your logic is quite faulty there.
That's not what I said. Evolution has structured your brain to be sexually attracted to women like your wife, while sexually repulsed by men. Evolution on a human scale doesn't work as fast as technology progresses; only a few generations ago there was no birth control except abstinance.
True Christians understand that there is no weight to sin.
True Christians try to live as Christ would want them to. Don't try to remove the speck from your brother's eye when there is a beam in your own. I'm a sinner, and so are you. Judging homosexuals for their sin is hypocricy.
However, some translations of the Bible refer to homosexuality as "the most disgusting sin" in god's eyes.
Chapter and verse? Moses' tablets said not to commit adultery.
I assume "war is not a sign" is a typo and what you meant was "war is not a sin"; but Moses' tablets are clear - thou shalt not kill. Jesus even went farther and said simply striking someone in anger is just as bad.
The old-testament is history and poetry. The New Testament pronounces the new covenant between God and God's people.
Since Moses brought the tablets from the mountain. There are ten laws which basically boil down to love and respect God and your neighbor.
It's been known that people of this lifestyle try to make it the new norm.
What can one do about it except to speak against its normality? Their sin is no worse than my own sins, and furthermore, I don't hink anyone chooses to become a homosexual.
I would applaud that, and not just for software. Any out of print book, album, movie; anything that can be given copyright protection should enter the public domain if it is out of print.
Too bad we have the best legislators that money can buy.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless your residence has a specific place and manner restriction on someone using a bullhorn in front of your sidewalk
The Constitution doe not grant rights to citizens; it defines the limits of governmental powers. And although IANAL I'm quite sure that even if there were no noise ordinances in my neighborhood, I could get a judgement against someone with a bullhorn on the street by my house.
Yes, but the grandparent installs an ALPHA operating system and complains that it's buggy. WTF??? He needs to put that crack pipe away and get the hell away from the computer!
How is all of what you hear about Windows 7 news? The fact is that progress of any new version of any OS is news. Do you complain when there is news about an upcoming yet unreaeased Mac OS?
If you made the same comment about a Windows 7 news item you would have been modded flamebait (not by me, mind you; I'd mod it as "overrated").
I'm excited about the progress; I use Mandriva dual boot; of the distros I've tried, it's my favorite. I haven't tried Ubantu yet, but that's only because I've been happy with Mandriva.
Oddly, I'm posting this comment on IE in Windows =(
Have the definitions of alpha and beta changed? An alpha used to be an in-house test, while a beta was released to outsiders.
I'm scratching my head trying to figure out how an open source project can have an alpha phase?
You have freedom of speech, not freedom to bother me. "Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins".
Your freedom of speech does not extend to standing on the sidewalk outside my residence with a bullhorn. My right to ignore you supercedes your right to speak.
I don't think Aubrey de Grey will live to see it, let alone me, but I can see a time when we will have nanorobots repairing our bodies cell by cell. Imagine figuring out how to put telomeraise back into chromosomes without causing cancer!
In fact I can see a time when everything you use will be made of interlocking nanorobots. No death, no want, in fact it may well be that we discover a way to reanimate formerly living cells; you will have all of the biblical prophesies of heaven on earth come true, thanks to scientific research.
Look at now compared to medevil times; you most likely live in far greater opulance than 10th century kings.
"Ugly bags of mostly water".
Seems I saw at least one study of carbon nanotubes in mice that showed that they were not problematic. And the summary's subject is, as usualy, misleadingly false. More true would be a headline "Nanomaterials Might Be More Dangerous Than We Think but then they might be safer".
Again, the Corporates shoot themselves in the feet with their own greed guns. The '00s are looking more and more like the 1920s, where thieves rule and the customer is an afterthought.
I think the answer to the question posed in the summary is a great big DUH!
Source for that joke: Mojo Nixon's Tie My Pecker To My Leg. He sings "I need a woman that's six feet ten, she gotta be that tall so's I can get it all in."
I presume you need a four foot tall or shorter woman or it's too loose?
Cities, corporations, and other collectives also have desires too
But they're made of people (or reasonable facimiles thereof).
Congratulations on 56 years of ignorance :D
Ignorance does have one advantage: you get the joy of learning!
Only if you drive wearing what race car drivers wear. And cops ahead of me don't bother me; it's when their in my rearview mirror I get nervous.
A rear mounted EMP would probably be more useful than a radar detector.
He's also against neo-pagans and wiccans too.
That's part of the "pseudo" part. If I thought Barr had a snowball in hell's chance of winning I wouldn't vote for him, and if the Greens are on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win, and don't nominate anyone worse than Barr, I'll vote for them.
Information doesn't want anything. As far as anyone can tell, only organisms with brains are capable of wanting.
And as to ignorance being liberating, in my 56 years I've never found that to be the case.
From the summary this seems to have a glaring drawback: it isn't Google. Yahoo search results are IMO quite inferior to Google's. Before Google I used infoseek, because it, too returned better results for me.
Google has let you use their search without restrictions almost since the beginning. When I had web sites I used Google for my site search, and a lot of big commercial sites do, too.
Why would you buy a Vega for the price of a Caddilac when the Caddilac gets better mileage?
It sure seems to have taken Yahoo a long time, too.
NOW you tell us! Where were you before the Iraq war? Gees, to think that the media shouldn't just publish corporate and government press releases before seeing if they had a shred of truth - what a concept! This will revolutionize news reporting!
If you publish the fact that it was published, then you are publishing facts. For example, if you say "George Bush is the anti-Christ" you are not publishing a fact, but if you say "Uncyclopedia says that George Bush is the anti-Christ" you are indeed publishing facts.
If your mainstream media newspaper quotes some kid's blog with attribution, then it is indeed publishing facts.
Reports say that Obama has a taste for kittens! What a devastating blow to his campaign! Surely he will lose ground in the animal rights voting bloc. We'll cover this next on our 3 hour special "Barack-uriosity Killed the Cat."
Does he huff them?
And in another part of Redmond the furniture store is hiring chair salesmen.
You've already admitted to an 'aversion to homosexuality', so obviously you're not going to have a lot of gay friends.
That's like "admitting" that my hair is gray. The aversion isn't to homosexuals, it's to homosexuality. The only time homosexuals bother me is when one hits on me.
Why, thank you :-)
I'm not exactly normal either. Heterosexual, but abnormal is a lot of ways. The thing about deformed animals wasn't a poke at anyone, just an illustration that sometimes a feature that makes an organism an evolutionary dead end keeps coming up. I'm not saying homosexuality is a "horrible deformity". A hairlip would be a horrible deformity. My oldest daughter's mental retardation is pretty bad; I'd rather she were gay than to be disabled as she is.
I wonder if you enjoy anal sex with your other-sex partners?
No. I did once with my ex-wife at her insistance, and couldn't keep an eraction.
How many people even use stereo mix? You record what's playing through your speakers. Any decent sound editing program is going to have some kind of mixer that will combine your recording with whatever you were playing along with.
My friend has a Dell, and for some reason you can't burn CDs with EAC on it. What we wind up doing when we're putting our LPs on CD is burn the .wav to CD as a data CD, then I take it home and burn it as a music CD. Oddly, his Dell will let you copy music CDs with no problem. So ironically, "fair use" is disabled while copyright infringement is not.
And unless by "speakers" you mean your guitar amp, if you are recording your speakers with a microphone you're doing it wrong. See an article I posted on K5 a few years ago, How to rip from vinyl or tape.
Dell is not the only one that distributes drivers that disable stereo mix. Lenovo has these problems too
So if Ford Crown Victorias explode when hit in the rear, it's OK for Chevy to make exploding cars? Your logic is quite faulty there.
I've never heard of an organization called the RIAA, have you?
It's a subset or the Music And Film Industry Association of America (M.A.F.I.A.A.)
That's not what I said. Evolution has structured your brain to be sexually attracted to women like your wife, while sexually repulsed by men. Evolution on a human scale doesn't work as fast as technology progresses; only a few generations ago there was no birth control except abstinance.
True Christians understand that there is no weight to sin.
True Christians try to live as Christ would want them to. Don't try to remove the speck from your brother's eye when there is a beam in your own. I'm a sinner, and so are you. Judging homosexuals for their sin is hypocricy.
However, some translations of the Bible refer to homosexuality as "the most disgusting sin" in god's eyes.
Chapter and verse? Moses' tablets said not to commit adultery.
I assume "war is not a sign" is a typo and what you meant was "war is not a sin"; but Moses' tablets are clear - thou shalt not kill. Jesus even went farther and said simply striking someone in anger is just as bad.
The old-testament is history and poetry. The New Testament pronounces the new covenant between God and God's people.
That is so.
Since when are some sins lesser than others.
Since Moses brought the tablets from the mountain. There are ten laws which basically boil down to love and respect God and your neighbor.
It's been known that people of this lifestyle try to make it the new norm.
What can one do about it except to speak against its normality? Their sin is no worse than my own sins, and furthermore, I don't hink anyone chooses to become a homosexual.
I would applaud that, and not just for software. Any out of print book, album, movie; anything that can be given copyright protection should enter the public domain if it is out of print.
Too bad we have the best legislators that money can buy.