Slashdot Mirror


Dell Colludes With RIAA, Disables Stereo Mix

RCTrucker7 writes with a link to a Maximum PC story, which begins: "Details of Dell's surreptitious collusion with RIAA (Record Industry Association of America) have emerged. Apparently, the computer manufacturer disabled the Stereo Mix/Mono Mix/Wave Out sound recording function on certain notebooks to assuage RIAA. The hardware functionality is being disabled without any prior notice and one blogger has even alleged that he was asked by Dell's customer support staff to [shell] out $99 if he desired the stereo mix option. Gateway and Pac Bell are the other two manufacturers to have bowed to RIAA at the expense of their customers' satisfaction and disabled stereo mix without warning." (There are some workarounds posted in the comments of the linked article.)

377 comments

  1. Any...facts in this case? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know it's fun to use hearsay and draw wild conclusions which make a boogeyman out of various unpopular (some rightly so) parties, but is there anything here besides a bunch of conjecture and reporting of anecdote as fact?

    1. Re:Any...facts in this case? by minerat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope. If you trace back the trail of links, the link for appeasing the riaa goes to a forum post that only mentions the details of the registry workaround. This was already determined to be hearsay on days ago when the story broke. Congratulations to the /. editors for their diligence.

      --
      ...and you've eaten your pen. simply stunning.
    2. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get off the internets!!!

    3. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Trails · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed. Techdirt had an article about this two days ago.

    4. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Details of Dell's surreptitious collusion with RIAA (Record Industry Association of America) have emerged.

      I'm glad they cleared that up. I've never heard of an organization called the RIAA, have you?

    5. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's better than not saying it, and filling an article with cryptic acronyms, regardless of how ubiquitous they may be to some people. STFU and GTFO.

    6. Re:Any...facts in this case? by LO0G · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's really funny is that I bet those machines run Vista.

      And Vista has the Stereo Mix functionality built into the OS!

    7. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Artuir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, which is still mostly conjecture and RIAA bashing. I don't see any evidence they were involved - if someone's got REAL links with REAL data, let's have them! Linking to a Dell page with a workaround for an issue isn't proof of all the wild speculation making the rounds.

    8. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the techdirt link posted above:

      However, there seems to be no evidence whatsoever that the RIAA had any part in this. On the whole, it sounds like someone just made a bad decision in terms of how to configure certain sound cards. If someone can provide any evidence that the RIAA actually had a role in this, we'll post an update, but there's no reason to jump to conclusions without any evidence. That's what the RIAA does.

      Yep, plenty of facts! Can't get more conclusive than that! RIAA is caught red-handed.

      I guess FUD works both ways.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    9. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Funny

      New headline then: Slashdot colludes with Trolls, posts flamebait article

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    10. Re:Any...facts in this case? by lordsid · · Score: 1, Troll

      Next you are going to expect the Bush administration to provide evidence they torture people. The incentive is there, draw your own conclusions.

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    11. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Par for the course...

    12. Re:Any...facts in this case? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      The incentive is there, draw your own conclusions.

      And her's a mat to help you!

    13. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're right. While we're at it we might as well go ahead and nullify the courts and just start rounding everyone up and locking them up because we all have incentive to do terrible things to get ahead in life. We sure as hell can't bother with all that pesky gathering of facts to determine guilt slow us down. I'll help speed the process up by turning myself in right now for all the things I might do in the future.

    14. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well - this is why they sound boarded it here on slashdot...

      If the critical thinkers of /. will protect the RIAA and say that they did not colude with dell on this one then they didnt!

    15. Re:Any...facts in this case? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      This is just a typical case of Hanlon's Razor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor):

      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"

      Very few people are truely evil, even RIAA/MPAA employees, but a lot of them are truely stupid.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posting to undo mismoderation!

    17. Re:Any...facts in this case? by StevenAD · · Score: 0

      Before you start complaining about /.'s editors, note the from line in the article's heading: "from the please-test-for-crazy-conspiracy dept." Where do I line up to complain about /.'s readers?

    18. Re:Any...facts in this case? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Do you have proof of collusion? Without proof, it's just conjecture. I mean, the rumor that /. is colluding with trolls can just be traced back to a bunch of comments on a message board. If someone's got REAL links with REAL data, let's have them!

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    19. Re:Any...facts in this case? by pla · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's really funny is that I bet those machines run Vista. And Vista has the Stereo Mix functionality built into the OS!

      Because, y'know, why should we actually let dedicated hardware do its thing when we can put the load on the CPU instead?

    20. Re:Any...facts in this case? by ltrm · · Score: 1

      You're right. While we're at it we might as well go ahead and nullify the courts and just start rounding everyone up and locking them up

      "Only" for 42 days, mind....

    21. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know, he also caused Hurricane Katrina?

    22. Re:Any...facts in this case? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of an organization called the RIAA, have you?

      It's a subset or the Music And Film Industry Association of America (M.A.F.I.A.A.)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    23. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know, he also caused Hurricane Katrina?

      Not surprising. After all, he is the biggest blowhard on the planet.

    24. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Trails · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's why I posted it. Techdirt is typically highly critical of the RIAA, and if THEY think this story smells, that it doesn't past muster.

    25. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a Dell XPS M1330 and noticed that, while I could mix sound output with as fine a granularity as the application level, there was no way to select a different recording source than the microphone.

      I assumed that this was not a Dell issue, but a windows Vista issue.

    26. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Check Control Panel > Sounds > Recording - the mixer, as you noted, is only for playback. But you can indeed have multiple recording devices, and they all have individual levels, AGC, etc.

    27. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next you are going to expect the Bush administration to provide evidence they torture people.

      They've publicly admitted to torturing people many times. They always follow it by explaining that there's some loophole in the law that doesn't make it officially torture.

    28. Re:Any...facts in this case? by Artuir · · Score: 1

      While drawing your own conclusions and thinking for yourself are very very valuable tools in today's world (and generally always have been), you need to be careful with that kind of attitude because it will do more harm than good.

      With the torture there is generally a trail, and some kind of evidence even if it is circumstantial. Witness testimony from people actually there, etc. - With Dell, there is absolutely no proof, even circumstantial, that they were tied to the RIAA in this decision in any way. I am not saying it is not possible, but what I am saying is the journalism is poor and people like you who demand to "draw your own conclusions" (i.e. conspiracy theorists) are what gives them ad revenue for putting out baseless accusations. Congratulations.

      You will note that I never said the RIAA was blameless. I am not sticking up for them or for Dell or anyone else. I just believe there ought to be some kind of evidence of some sort that is a bit harder than the tripe these articles amount to, which is 100% conjecture and imaginings.

  2. Next Story: by Deltaspectre · · Score: 5, Funny

    The MPAA has decided that asking large computer manufacturers to disable any Video Out options, so pirates are thwarted.

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
    1. Re:Next Story: by edalytical · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oddly enough the screenshot feature of Mac OS X is disabled when you are playing a DVD. I'd take a screenshot of the error message, but I obviously can't.

      This seems to be the current trend. You can't print bank notes from Photoshop, you can't record audio on your computer, you can't take screenshots. I'm sure this is just scratching the surface of treacherous computing...

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    2. Re:Next Story: by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Same thing happens in Windows XP (haven't checked Vista but it's probably the same). If you're playing a DVD and take a screenshot the area where the DVD was (if you were playing it in a window) is black.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    3. Re:Next Story: by nawcom · · Score: 0

      From now on instead of seeing the video you have to use your brilliant imagination and computing intellect to watch them. I can see the commercials for this new technology now...

    4. Re:Next Story: by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't print bank notes from Photoshop

      Bet you can print 'em up in GIMP. Don't let the Government find out about that though, bad things might #$*&(*@&*(*!)(*)!*)(#*)@CARRIER LOST

      Actually, in all seriousness I'm not advocating the forgery of banknotes. Just pointing out the rather obvious fact that open source software isn't going to come crippled for my "protection". Wonder how long hardware will remain the same? Was this crippling of the notebooks done in software or hardware?

      Either way, why are people still giving Dell money?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Next Story: by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      The cool part, leave the DVD up and move Paint or wherever you pasted the screenshot to over it and you'll see sections of the movie :P

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    6. Re:Next Story: by ericlondaits · · Score: 4, Informative

      AKAIK the DVD plays in an "overlay" layer... it's not rendered to the player's window like normal windows graphics but it's rather placed on top of it (in a similar fashion to directX, I assume). That would explain why screen captures (which must work at windows UI graphic level) don't capture DVD or divX frames.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    7. Re:Next Story: by Oronar · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have to turn your hardware acceleration off.

      Right-click
      Properties
      Settings Tab
      Advanced
      Troubleshoot Tab
      Drag slider to the left

      Take you pictures and just slide it back to the right.

      --
      1 4/\/\ 1337
    8. Re:Next Story: by setagllib · · Score: 3, Informative

      Welcome to the dreadful hack that is the Windows graphics overlay system. It allocates a very specific color that will be treated as a video area by the video card, so that it won't overlap windows that should be on top. It's clever, but XVideo in the open source world is much better. As usual.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    9. Re:Next Story: by LordRPI · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, the RIAA is pushing OB/GYNs to disable the hearing component of newborn babies brain's at birth. A special chip will be implanted and used to re-enable hearing at a cost of $99. As an easter egg, this chip will automatically deduct $0.99 from the parent's bank account anytime the baby has a tune stuck in their head.

    10. Re:Next Story: by Oronar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right-click your desktop.

      Seriously need an edit for comments. =/

      --
      1 4/\/\ 1337
    11. Re:Next Story: by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Nah thats a bug with Windows.
      Try taking a screenshot of WMP's visualisations as well.

    12. Re:Next Story: by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

      I seriously doubt Photoshop would stop you, but that's just me. It seems a little pointless to have photo-editing software try to do that.

      That said, for years scanners, copiers, and I believe laser prints have been designed to try to detect people copying currency and refuse to print. It may happen in ink jets and other printers too. I believe it is only the high end models though.

      There is also the "invisible" yellow dot tracking that so many printers do today (you can Google it, or I know it's been discussed here years ago).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    13. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This isn't anything special. A screenshot in Windows isn't the video out. It is what the Win32 subsystem sees. The only thing that the Win32 subsystem sees when you are playing a DVD is the window surrounding it. This is because the program running the DVD will be accessing the hardware outside of the Win32 subsystem.

    14. Re:Next Story: by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I seriously doubt Photoshop would stop you, but that's just me. It seems a little pointless to have photo-editing software try to do that.

      Are you sure about that?

      There is also the "invisible" yellow dot tracking that so many printers do today (you can Google it, or I know it's been discussed here years ago).

      I'm well aware of it. I guess the anonymous "printing press" was just too much for the Government to contemplate leaving around.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Next Story: by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be new here. When did we ever see CARRIER LOST? It was always NO CARRIER.

      And don't even get me started on the immediate follow-up with "... in all seriousness". :-)

    16. Re:Next Story: by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually you can still take screenshots. There are three easy ways. One is to use Grab.app. Another is to use the 'screencapture' command line tool in Terminal. And lastly you can use any third-party screen capture program. Apple half-assedly only disables the standard keyboard shortcuts. This is typical of their compliance with required terms for media playback. For example, the standard DVD player contract also requires making a reasonable effort to disable debuggers. Apple does this by calling ptrace(PT_DENY_ATTACH, 0, 0, 0) during application startup. This causes the application to crash if it's being run in the debugger, and causes any debugger attached to the application later to crash. It's laughably easy to work around, though; just set a breakpoint on the ptrace function, then tell the debugger to return immediately when it's hit. Presto!

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    17. Re:Next Story: by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oddly enough the screenshot feature of Mac OS X is disabled when you are playing a DVD. I'd take a screenshot of the error message, but I obviously can't.

      This limitation in OS X has been there for a long, long time; it's nothing new. I don't think it's part of any trend. The blocks in place for Grab.app, etc. aren't terribly hard to circumvent, targeting casual users who will give up before querying Google for workarounds. Last time I checked, you don't need anything that doesn't ship with OS X itself to take screencaps of DVD Player.

      Though I do agree that Apple bothering to throw up blocks at all seems a bit odd, if but a half-hearted attempt akin to the CD burning limitations of iTunes. Must be some mildly interesting history behind the original decision there...

    18. Re:Next Story: by CCFreak2K · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep. Video overlay. This occurs for pretty much any video in any video player that uses overlays. No conspiracy there.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    19. Re:Next Story: by Drantin · · Score: 1

      That was the way it used to work for regular videos even... if you turned off playback acceleration, you could take screenshots but the video was a bit choppy...

      Last time I tried that was around 2000 or so, I'm not sure how to do it with current versions of media player, but you could try looking for programs made to take directx screenshots. They're made for games but I believe they work for that overlay layer the media player uses...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    20. Re:Next Story: by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Lol, and I was about to buy a mac. One of the things I love to do is take screenshots of DVDs to write up on blog posts. Is that illegal or something ?

    21. Re:Next Story: by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. When did we ever see CARRIER LOST? It was always NO CARRIER.

      Really? Wow, I suck. Guess I should stick to what I know best -- underpants gnomes, federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and Soviet Russia ;)

      And don't even get me started on the immediate follow-up with "... in all seriousness". :-)

      Well I was actually trying to make a serious point of sorts.... what does all of this crippling actually accomplish?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    22. Re:Next Story: by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The MPAA has decided that asking large computer manufacturers to disable any Video Out options, so pirates are thwarted.

      It's called Protected Media Path.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    23. Re:Next Story: by toddestan · · Score: 3, Informative

      An easier way to do is to take advantage of the fact that Windows XP can only use the hardware to render one video stream at a time*. So:

      1. Start up some video player and have it play any old video file.
      2. Pause this video player (optional).
      3. Start up another video player and have it play the file you want to take screenshots of. Windows will render this video using software.
      4. Capture your screenshots.

      *Some fancy video cards may have drivers to work around this limitation. It also probably won't work in Vista.

    24. Re:Next Story: by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      I laugh at the moronic masses who don't have a fucking clue what's going on inside their computers (or not going on as the case may be) and the companies who are screwing them.

      Oh well, my PC built from select components running Slackware 12.0 runs like a top. Any manufacturer who caves to the interests of big media and negatively impacts end users (their customers) will never see a dime of my money.

      A little research goes a long way. Too bad Joe Six pack is an apathetic imbecile, otherwise we as customers could actually shift the power back into our hands before it's too late. I'm quite pessimistic however.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    25. Re:Next Story: by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's called Preview, the button left of the [Submit]

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    26. Re:Next Story: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      I'm still running Win2K on my desktop. If you turn off all the video acceleration options in Windows Media Player, then you can get screenshots. I'd suspect XP is about the same.

    27. Re:Next Story: by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or just use VLC and use the Video -> Snapshot menu option

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    28. Re:Next Story: by moosesocks · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's clever, but XVideo in the open source world is much better.

      I'm sorry.... are you defending X?

      You do realize that we only got the ability to switch resolutions without killing the entire desktop a few years ago. Cut & Paste is only finally beginning to reach a state of usefulness.

      I suppose the video layer might be alright (I don't have enough experience to say), but X was an absolute mess until just a few years ago.

      Windows may suck, but X11 has traditionally been one of the absolute worst things about Unix.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    29. Re:Next Story: by Tom9729 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the dreadful hack that is the Windows graphics overlay system. It allocates a very specific color that will be treated as a video area by the video card, so that it won't overlap windows that should be on top. It's clever, but XVideo in the open source world is much better. As usual.

      I don't know if this "bug" is still around, but when I was young (8-9?) on Windows 98SE, I figured out quite by accident that if you took a screenshot while a video was playing in Windows Media Player, the video would keep playing in the screenshot.

      You could actually draw on the video in MS Paint. It was absolutely useless, but I found it so strange at the time. I had kind of forgotten about it until now.

      This is going to sound a little corny, but thank you for answering a question I had roughly 10 years ago. :)

    30. Re:Next Story: by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I'd take a screenshot of the error message, but I obviously can't.

      Use a digital camera. That's what I do when Windows BSODs on me every week.

    31. Re:Next Story: by setagllib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and XVideo is still much better than Windows' overlay. I'd be the last to defend X itself. I've looked in the source. Global event arrays and select() are used as the core of the entire XFree/XOrg implementation. Enough said.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    32. Re:Next Story: by setagllib · · Score: 2, Informative

      I noticed the same thing on Windows 2000, and I found out it was because that color, which is copied exactly into the Paint instance during a screenshot, becomes transparent on the video card.

      Actually, a lot of legacy image formats did that too, before widespread ARGB use became viable. Instead of having arbitrary levels of transparency, a specific color would be chosen and saved in the image file, and this color is excluded from the bitblt that draws the image.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    33. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha Ha!!
      I paid cash for a new unopened printer off of Craigslist.

    34. Re:Next Story: by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when has any Mac software let you do what you wanted ? It goes against the philosophy of the platform. They simplify everything, leave with you a single way to do stuff, and it just so happens that one way usually works pretty well. In a sense, Macs are kind of like game consoles.

      Your DVDs play well, and have been doing so for longer than the PC players - you don't need to download your DVD playing software from some idiotic Chinese software company that couldn't even write a goddamned Solitaire clone without crashing :P

      Besides, there are other ways to get screen grabs from video - like using a video editor!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    35. Re:Next Story: by David+Horn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Looks like they fixed it in Vista - I just got a shot from a commercial DVD out of Media Player with no issues. And people (including me) criticised it for being crippled with DRM. Oops.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    36. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the anonymous "printing press" was just too much for the Government to contemplate leaving around.

      When that printing press is capable of making near-perfect reproductions of currency, and easily accessible information on how to defeat or mimic many of the security features is found on the Internet, then yes, it is too much to leave around.

      It may cause a hassle for a few people, but if it prevents even a fraction of the billions of costs coming out of counterfeit currency, it's a fair trade in the judgment of society. The price you pay for letting people vote is that they might not be smart enough to use it and often will not agree with you about the "right" thing to do.

      If Linux printing didn't suck so much, and if GIMP could convincingly reproduce currency, maybe there would be more attention paid to whether or not pixel-perfect currency reproduction should be permitted.

    37. Re:Next Story: by mrbcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, Idiocracy was a documentary.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    38. Re:Next Story: by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When that printing press is capable of making near-perfect reproductions of currency, and easily accessible information on how to defeat or mimic many of the security features is found on the Internet, then yes, it is too much to leave around.

      That argument doesn't hold water as a defense of the watermarking technology that I was talking to. My complaint is with the practice of forcing printers to leave a serial number behind that law enforcement can track.

      That "technique" does not survive a rational examination. That watermarking technology might catch the dumbass teenager that tries to pass a photoshopped $20 bill off on one of the drones at Wally World. But it's not going to catch professional counterfeiters. You really think that they are going to buy printers in such a way that can be traced back to them? The last time I checked it wasn't illegal to buy things with cash in this country and even if it were there are all sorts of ways to obtain things through "unofficial" channels (buying people off at Xerox comes to mind).

      Given that, I don't really see how you can defend this practice. It doesn't do much of anything to deter counterfeiting. Yet it makes it that much easier for the Government to trace political communications that it might not agree with. Don't think it's happened before? Think again.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    39. Re:Next Story: by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      You can't print bank notes from Photoshop

      Nonsense. I scanned and edited (and destroyed the original image in accordance with Treasury rules that allow this) a $100 bill in Photoshop for a project I was working on, worked quite fine.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    40. Re:Next Story: by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      you can do all of the above with FOSS... until they start removing capabilities like audio recording from the hardware

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    41. Re:Next Story: by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      WMP10 (11?) and later did away with overlays in Windows a couple of years ago. I forget what the replacement's called.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    42. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, adobe does do it.

    43. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP was talking about the controversial Photoshop restriction that prevents (depending on the version) opening or printing scanned currency--certain denominations in three currencies.

      Google this and you'll find the now-popular work-around and explanatory video in the first results.

    44. Re:Next Story: by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Windows may suck, but X11 has traditionally been one of the absolute worst things about Unix."

      In some technical aspects, perhaps. But being able to run a graphics program on my work test system with the X11 output being ssh-forwarded to my work desktop computer then over the VPN to my Linux machine at home and then over the wireless network to my Windows laptop in the garden where it's finally displayed is one of the best features of Unix; whereas having to actually sit at the bloody keyboard and monitor to do pretty much anything at all is one of the worst features of Windows.

      As for overlay, it was pretty much a requirement for decent video playback a few years ago when CPUs couldn't cope with color space conversion and scaling and the PCI/AGP bus couldn't cope with the data transfer requirements even if they could. Today it's pretty much obsolete as the hardware is plenty fast enough and rendering video through the GPU is much easier than having an overlay bodge unit stuck on the side.

    45. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XVideo ALSO uses overlay with chroma keying (filling the window with blue and letting the card fill in video) on virtually any card. Newer ones have the option of using textured video (Matrox G200 is the oldest card I know of that allows this (and it uses overlay by default.)

              XVideo DOES kick ass though: 1) I think Windows uses overlay on many cards that it doesn't need to.

              2) A few days ago where I work, we set up a 5-head system, using 5 different video cards (1 AGP, 4 PCI). XVideo actually accelerates video ON ALL 5 HEADS. I honestly was shocked, I thought it'd accelerate one, or make the video at least be on one screen -- nope! I stretched an mplayer across all 5 -- perfect acceleration. Not even the same cards! We've used 3 combinations. 1st: TNT2, Rage128, Matrox Millenium II or so, Geforce MX4000, and Geforce 2MX. 2nd: TNT2 x2, Rage, MX4000, 2MX. 3rd: MX4000, 2MX, TNT2, 2 FX5200s. All 3 configs were just fine.

    46. Re:Next Story: by phagstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, federal underpants gnomes, pound-YOU-in-the....wait...naaaa

    47. Re:Next Story: by x2A · · Score: 1

      "Is that illegal or something?"

      Most likely no, but depends where you live. In fact in many places you will find you actually have the right to do things like using excepts in reviews (where "copyright" laws grant rights to both the creator and to the purchaser), which is one reason many people have a problem with it - media and software companies putting restrictions on what you can do with that which you've paid for, restricting your rights granted by the law, or taking away your rights in an even less democratic process than government does.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    48. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What makes you think this is Windows-specific? You are aware that Xvideo does the same thing, right?

      Color keyed overlays were part of video display hardware long before it was supported in Windows. They're basically the only way to get hardware accelerated YUV conversion on older video cards.

    49. Re:Next Story: by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      The Bank Notes thing is just rediculous. I mean, of all the things to do when making a convincing forgery of a currency, I don't think printing to a deskjet is one of them. Boneheads.

    50. Re:Next Story: by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Just pointing out the rather obvious fact that open source software isn't going to come crippled for my "protection"

      Oh yeah ? Try to print or extract images from a PDF file marked as 'read-only' from xpdf or kpdf. It won't let you. I downloaded the source and found the comments in the right spots, something like "Adobe would be onto us if we did this". Unfortunately I couldn't get it to compile under cygwin.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    51. Re:Next Story: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You can't print bank notes from Photoshop
      Nonsense. I scanned and edited (and destroyed the original image in accordance with Treasury rules that allow this) a $100 bill in Photoshop for a project I was working on, worked quite fine.

      For the last 4 or 5 years Photoshop has had a module that prevents that. See this Wired article.

      Adobe acknowledged last week that its Photoshop CS digital editing package includes a "counterfeit deterrence system" designed to prevent users from accessing images of currency.... The anti-counterfeit software in Photoshop CS was developed by the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group

      It's not hard to circumvent, but it certainly is there.

    52. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..have you not heard of VNC? It's multi- and cross-platform (you can view a Windows PCs' graphic output on a Linux box via TCP/IP, and visa versa). It sucks for trying to watch videos/play games in (it drops the framerate to below 1) - but if you're viewing something across the internet, I wouldn't want it to kill all my bandwidth by replaying full-framerate video. For the record, I recommend UltraVNC for over LAN, and tightVNC for over the internet (both are interoperable though).

    53. Re:Next Story: by Alioth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We did? You could change X video resolution with a simple set of keystrokes... in 1993. While it wasn't a particularly user friendly way of changing resolution it could be done and it didn't require a desktop restart.

    54. Re:Next Story: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I know you said RIAA, not MPAA; but the joke is on you.

    55. Re:Next Story: by NetNifty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In KPDF, go into the Settings Menu / Configure KPDF and untick "Obey DRM Restrictions".

    56. Re:Next Story: by kipman725 · · Score: 1

      I can change my x resolution on the fly xrandr can do it.

    57. Re:Next Story: by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Or simply play another video, pause it, minimize the window and then play the video you want in a second video player (this one can't use overlay because the minimized one uses overlay, so you'll be able to print the image).

    58. Re:Next Story: by ya+really · · Score: 1

      Anything that is going to be printed with an offset press (digital or the old fashioned kind) wont be rendered in some pixel based program such as photoshop. Either vector based Corel Draw or Illustrator would be in order. Many (but obviously not all) secure government documents are rendered with Corel products, since they have a very lengthy contract with them to use it. Pretty much Corel survives only due to government contracts period, since Adobe has the private marketshare under wraps.

    59. Re:Next Story: by Inda · · Score: 1

      My cheap-as-chips, bargin-bucket, bottom of the range Kodak all-in-one won't let me scan british bank notes nor will it photocopy them.

      Excellent photo printer for the money btw. The box said lab quality and I thought "yeah, right" but they really are that good.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    60. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if one were to find the said press, very few would know how to use it. Ever seen or used an offset press? They're a beast and nothing like what you have sitting next to your computer at home. Silk screening is somewhat similar, but it's still like comparing alegebra to calc. They're somewhat similar, but one is way more complex. Having the press isnt enough either. You'll have to find the color shifting OVI (optical variable inks), which are only sold by one company, located in switzerland. They have a very SHORT list of whom they will sell to. There are similar inks elsewhere, but not quite the same. If you can deal with that, you'll also have to deal with the finding the proper magnetic inks aside from the metal strip embedded in the bill which glows under a blacklight.

      maybe there would be more attention paid to whether or not pixel-perfect currency reproduction should be permitted.

      I believe you mean PPI (points per sq inch) or LPI (lines per square inch) perfect, since it wont be rendered with a program that uses pixels (such as photoshop).

    61. Re:Next Story: by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Aperently, Elements doesn't have it. I've done it in Photoshop 6 as well as Elements.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    62. Re:Next Story: by joto · · Score: 1, Informative

      I laugh at the moronic masses who don't have a fucking clue what's going on inside their computers (or not going on as the case may be) and the companies who are screwing them.

      Yeah, I guess that must make you feel pretty important. Wow! You actually understand something about computers! You must be my God! Please allow me to sacrifice this lamb for you... Seriously, get a life. Most people know something you don't care about, whether it's carpentry, ice climbing, knitting, or the political history of China around 600ad. That you happen to know computers doesn't make you any more interesting, but your superiority complex certainly makes you look like a big fucking idiot!

      Oh well, my PC built from select components running Slackware 12.0 runs like a top. Any manufacturer who caves to the interests of big media and negatively impacts end users (their customers) will never see a dime of my money.

      Any child can build a PC from components. It's as easy as assembling lego, the pieces are made to fit together, and if you are in doubt, the manual tells you everything you need to know. Many computers stores allow you to select components that fit together by choosing from a drop-down list at their web-page, so that doesn't impress me either. In 2008, computers are commonplace, and I expect them to work, whether they are assembled by a Taiwanese company, or some hobbyist nerd at home.

      A little research goes a long way. Too bad Joe Six pack is an apathetic imbecile, otherwise we as customers could actually shift the power back into our hands before it's too late. I'm quite pessimistic however.

      Actually, I find you to be the imbecile. Do you even know what apathetic means? Anyway, there are plenty of examples throughout history where history takes the wrong turn, despite people knowing better. And seriously, I'm not going to get worked up about a software configuration issue, even if some anonymous posters on the Internet claim it was done by RIAA. It could just as well be disabled because few people used it, and it complicated the mixer for those "imbeciles" you feel so superior to.

    63. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe Grab.app can't get it, but using a Screenshot-taker Dashboard widget I've had no problems grabbing shots from DVD player.

    64. Re:Next Story: by joto · · Score: 1

      Ever worked in a store? Your forgery does not have to be very convincing, as long as it's for a small amount. I once used a color copier to make bills with 50 Kr (the Norwegian currency) on one side, and 100 Kr on the other. Those bills have different size, and different color, and given that my forgery was printed on normal paper, it was certainly not very convincing. The clerk at the grocery store accepted it (the 50 kr side) as payment until I stopped and told him to look once more.

    65. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AKAIK the DVD plays in an "overlay" layer... it's not rendered to the player's window like normal windows graphics but it's rather placed on top of it (in a similar fashion to directX, I assume). That would explain why screen captures (which must work at windows UI graphic level) don't capture DVD or divX frames.

      OSX doesn't use overlays like Windows, everything is rendered using OpenGL. Vista has moved in that direction too.

      Overlay was just a hardware compositing trick from the earlier days where there was no way efficient way to display large scaled video smoothly on a computer screen.

    66. Re:Next Story: by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow. Are you serious? You owe me a new monitor. Coffee everywhere.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    67. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the dreadful hack that is the Windows graphics overlay system. It allocates a very specific color that will be treated as a video area by the video card, so that it won't overlap windows that should be on top. It's clever, but XVideo in the open source world is much better. As usual.

      A cheap shot.. The overlay compositing system is in no way specific to Windows, and in the early days it was the only possible way to render scaled video efficiently on a computer.

      You can easily find players for Windows which don't use overlay for rendering today, such as MPC, which can output also using DirectDraw, Direct3D or OpenGL surfaces.

      Overlay is also deprecated in "Aero" mode in Vista, which uses pure Direct3D for compositing all windows (like OSX or Compiz on Linux does with OpenGL).

    68. Re:Next Story: by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What kind of casual user would be using a debugger though? Why disable the debugger if it's trivial for any person with enough knowledge to use the debugger to get the debugger to run anyway?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    69. Re:Next Story: by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I had an old ATI TV Tuner card. If you opened up MSPaint, and drew in purple, the video would show through. So you fill the picture with purple, and then select the yellow brush, and you had yourself a really cheap telestrator.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    70. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I seriously doubt Photoshop would stop you [printing bank notes], but that's just me. It seems a little pointless to have photo-editing software try to do that. "

      Then be amazed, because it is in Photoshop CS (I don't know about later versions -- I presume it's there too). Without some fiddling (see the Wired article below), you can't cut-and-paste parts of a bank note image larger than a certain size, you can't open a file with a bank note image, you can't print it, etc.

      Refer to this post, this /. article, this international government agreement that encouraged its "voluntary" implementation, and this Wired article describing how pointless it all is.

      But the "feature" is definitely there, so I wouldn't put it past the RIAA/MPAA to ask software and/or hardware vendors to "voluntarily" comply with a similar request to hinder "prohibited" operations. The real question is whether vendors would be foolish enough to cave to them. Hopefully not.

    71. Re:Next Story: by pla · · Score: 1

      AKAIK the DVD plays in an "overlay" layer...

      True, and you can usually disable that by turning off all "optimization" features in your player (or if you use one of the far superior FOSS players, just tell it to use software rather than overlay or DX rendering). Presto, DVD output goes to a normal capturable window rather than to a magic green rectangle only visible to the video card.

    72. Re:Next Story: by molarmass192 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, VNC sounds great! I assume it's a default install and enabled with all Windows versions? I also assume that I can send one app's windows to one machine and another app's windows to second machine? I'm assuming that it doesn't block simultaneous control of the GUI to other users as well, right? Ok, sarcasm aside, VNC is great for tight bandwidth situations, X is a bandwidth buster, but it's functionality is extremely limited as compared to X. It's like trying to compare Notepad to Word, and that's being generous.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    73. Re:Next Story: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Why disable the debugger if it's trivial for any person with enough knowledge to use the debugger to get the debugger to run anyway?

      I'd assume Apple signed a contract obliging them to take such measures. They don't really care how effective they are.

    74. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can screenshot in OS X using VLC.

    75. Re:Next Story: by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget Microsoft's Remote Desktop.

      It's very fast. NX might have the advantage on Unix, but RDP is certainly a legitimately good product.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    76. Re:Next Story: by Novus · · Score: 1

      The GP is serious. As of KDE 3.5, KPDF has a GUI option to disable DRM. Before that, DRM was only a compile-time option ("--enable-kpdf-drm", on by default). The documentation even notes that the option to enable DRM "is not available" "in some configurations of KPDF".

    77. Re:Next Story: by onecheapgeek · · Score: 1

      Troll mod. I love it.

      He calls anyone who just wants to USE a computer an apathetic imbecile, and you're the troll. I guess smug self-importance is something the /. crowd really clings to. Well, whatever helps them sleep at night, right?

    78. Re:Next Story: by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the screenshot feature of Mac OS X is disabled when you are playing a DVD. I'd take a screenshot of the error message, but I obviously can't.

      The most likely reason for this is that the DVD output is implemented as an overlay within the video system, and the framebuffer that screenshots are grabbed from does not include that overlay.

      The first DVD playback device I owned -- a Creative DVD-ROM drive with a dedicated decoder card -- actually had an external passthrough that the VGA cable had to go through, as it was not practical to composite the decoded MPEG video onto the rest of the desktop in software at that time.

    79. Re:Next Story: by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Cut & Paste is only finally beginning to reach a state of usefulness.

      Ah, the cut-n-paste meme....

      Care to elaborate what has changed that things have become `better' now?

    80. Re:Next Story: by anerki · · Score: 1

      Just close all the Windows in the Finder, swap programs. DVD should be running in the background, take a screenshot, and use whatever you got around to remove the menu bar, since there's always black bars on top and below the movie anyway ...

      --
      Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
    81. Re:Next Story: by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Huh...

      The XV overlay feature of your X server does the same thing -- a key color is replaced with video. You can, of course CHANGE the key color (default is actually visible in the nVidia driver): I use R=0 B=1 G=0 which is close to black. It's the XV_COLORKEY property. Try setting it to pure black or white, and put a terminal window on top of the video -- lovely effect.

      How is this superior, when it's the same?

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    82. Re:Next Story: by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      If you need / want to without installing a third party solution, there is an "easy" way to do it (undocumented, unintuitive, I admit). Pause where you want the frame to be. Display Control Panel... turn Hardware Acceleration off. Take screenshot. Put it back on, resume playback. :)

    83. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also the "invisible" yellow dot tracking that so many printers do today (you can Google it, or I know it's been discussed here years ago).

      Just run your yellow cartridge dry, like I am doing right this mom -- crap! Well, do you think anyone will fall for blue money?

    84. Re:Next Story: by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      X is a bandwidth buster,

      No, not really. X's main problem is a reliance on request/acknowledge handshaking that makes it very, very sensitive to latency. You might even say that the X protocol does not have windows.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    85. Re:Next Story: by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You could change X video resolution with a simple set of keystrokes... in 1993.

      No, in 1993 you could change the monitor's resolution not the X video resolution.

      The X server's resolution stayed the same - if the new monitor resolution was smaller than the X server's it would hardware pan the desktop. If the new monitor resolution was greater than the X server's it would only partially fill the monitor. Either way, the configuration of the framebuffer stayed the same. And, FWIW, all that was a particular implementation detail of XFree86, it was not a part of the X protocol it self as is the new RandR stuff that the previous poster was referring to.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    86. Re:Next Story: by lgw · · Score: 1

      It will only object to the back of recent notes. Look at the back of a 20 - see all those little "20"s that make the bill look ugly? The '0's form the 5-circle pattern that identifies a note, sometimes called the "Euro constellation". If you look closely you'll see the 5-circle pattern repeated many times.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    87. Re:Next Story: by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      What kind of casual user would be using a debugger though? Why disable the debugger if it's trivial for any person with enough knowledge to use the debugger to get the debugger to run anyway?

      Perhaps the above is in response to some other portion of this thread , but I never mentioned use of a debugger, and there's no need to use one in order to capture video stills from Apple's DVD Player.app. Not sure what you're on about.

    88. Re:Next Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think his post was directed at individual computer users but the problem as a whole. People need to start paying attention to what big business is doing to us and I agree. mod gp up.

    89. Re:Next Story: by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      I laugh at the moronic masses who don't have a fucking clue what's going on inside their computers (or not going on as the case may be) and the companies who are screwing them.

      Yeah, I guess that must make you feel pretty important. Wow! You actually understand something about computers! You must be my God! Please allow me to sacrifice this lamb for you... Seriously, get a life. Most people know something you don't care about, whether it's carpentry, ice climbing, knitting, or the political history of China around 600ad. That you happen to know computers doesn't make you any more interesting, but your superiority complex certainly makes you look like a big fucking idiot!

      I don't have a superiority complex, I have a power to the people complex. Please do sacrifice a lamb for me, lamb is good eatin'.

      Oh well, my PC built from select components running Slackware 12.0 runs like a top. Any manufacturer who caves to the interests of big media and negatively impacts end users (their customers) will never see a dime of my money.

      Any child can build a PC from components. It's as easy as assembling lego, the pieces are made to fit together, and if you are in doubt, the manual tells you everything you need to know. Many computers stores allow you to select components that fit together by choosing from a drop-down list at their web-page, so that doesn't impress me either. In 2008, computers are commonplace, and I expect them to work, whether they are assembled by a Taiwanese company, or some hobbyist nerd at home.

      I realize I'm not exactly elite in my skill of building PCs but it's definitely more complex than assembling Lego when you need to understand drivers, compatibility, voltages, clock speed, multipliers, etc., especially when you run Linux.

      A little research goes a long way. Too bad Joe Six pack is an apathetic imbecile, otherwise we as customers could actually shift the power back into our hands before it's too late. I'm quite pessimistic however.

      Actually, I find you to be the imbecile. Do you even know what apathetic means? Anyway, there are plenty of examples throughout history where history takes the wrong turn, despite people knowing better. And seriously, I'm not going to get worked up about a software configuration issue, even if some anonymous posters on the Internet claim it was done by RIAA. It could just as well be disabled because few people used it, and it complicated the mixer for those "imbeciles" you feel so superior to.

      First of all screw you, you're an asshole. Secondly my statements were meant to be taken more in the general sense in that people have become oblivious to the fact that government and corporate America is having us bend over and most of us are taking it.
      Um, why wouldn't I know what apathetic means? Does that seem like a big word to you perhaps? I'm guessing you're the one who had to look that up.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    90. Re:Next Story: by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      It is not possible to capture the screenshot of a movie playing using hardware acceleration on X on Linux either. Please see the Mplayer, Gstreamer, Xine threads on this - you will notice that the only way one can capture the screenshots from a movie is to disable hardware acceleration.

  3. Why is RIAA asking this? by BabbageTuring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

    1. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

      As a musician, I would want to challenge this as abridgement of my rights, and I'd want to make a (worth $Billions$) anti-trust case out of it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by afidel · · Score: 1

      If they want high quality they would use an XLR input box connected to firewire (or at least USB2 with a buffer). Trying to record using an unbalanced stereo input in a noisy RF environment just doesn't work well, I've tried.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Lumenary7204 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Parent modded as "Funny", but you know, the "Independent musician invoking antitrust against the RIAA" thing might just have something going for it.

      Too bad you'd need a huge chunk of capital just to get the legal ball rolling...

    4. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if you are trying to record anything in high quality using the sterio plugs on your laptop, you are doing it very, very, wrong

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Not at all, If you sign up with the Riaa, then you can sign over all rights and record to your hearts desire.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      As a musician, I would want to challenge this as abridgement of my rights, and I'd want to make a (worth $Billions$) anti-trust case out of it.

      It isn't about recording audio input from microphones, it is about making a copy of whats going out to the speakers.

      Any musician would be using more than simple playback software, probably some sort of mixer-board sort of thing, and would be able to record their own audio before even sending it to the speakers in the first place.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

      correct - any musician wanting decent sound quality will use an spdif (or similar) interface and do the analog/digital conversion outside the computer.

      these days, if you need only 2 channel stereo you can use a usb-audio input device and there are ones that have spdif toslink (opto) inputs. then you front-end that with an a/d converter, maybe a small mixer and you're all set. can be done for $100 or so and you'll get bit-perfect recording. usb-audio (asynch) drivers are driverless! so there's nothing 'they' can disable on you.

      same with usb-audio style spdif out devices. those run in synch mode and they are also driverless (mac, win, linux, bsd, you name it). you can find usb audio dongles that support 2496 samplerates and even DD5.1/DTS via raw mode.

      no one that would be 'serious' would use the analog i/o ports on a notebook for recording.

      BUT that does not let dell off the hook for hobling their own goddamn hardware. no excuse for that kind of behavior. shame on dell. I will remember this stunt for the next time an IT manager type asks me which brand of hardware we should go with.

      vote with your dollars. avoid dell and when asked, TELL them why.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Kopiok · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've just been using my laptop's built in microphone.

    9. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by XanC · · Score: 2, Informative

      We're not talking about recording from input; we're talking about making a copy of the output as it goes to the speakers. I don't think there's any D to A involved in recording this way, although you do lose a generation, and of course if the source was compressed you're in extra trouble.

    10. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >It isn't about recording audio input from microphones, it is about making a copy of whats going out to the speakers.

      Don't try to dictate to me how I may, or may not, use my tools, thank you.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >if you are trying to record anything in high quality using the sterio plugs on your laptop, you are doing it very, very, wrong

      Yes, when I do serious work, I do it on the Studer desk with the Iz Radar V.
      So?
      How does this change my argument that crippling my hardware in a specific way, does not limit me from using it for a specific production technique?

      Recording the stereo mix of a consumer sound device is a legitimate technique, and for the *RIAA* to be the party suppressing the capability is unacceptable. All the twittering jibes about how "you shouldn't do that" don't add up to anything.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      This has been the real motivation behind their attacks all along. The restrictions placed on consumer minidisk players(the much more expensive "pro" version didn't have these restrictions) is the first time I became aware of what they are up to. I didn't know what a bunch snakes Avid was at the time. Gotta keep those barriers as high as possible...

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You don't need this to record.

      What has been disabled is the loopback, which lets you record the music that the computer is playing.
      Youtube for example.

    14. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by batura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a musician, you should simply buy a computer from a different manufacturer.

    15. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, maybe if you can afford that stuff. some of us *like* recording various bits in a simple sound recording application (sndrec32 comes to mind) and playing them at the same time into another recording, just for screwing-around purposes.

      why do i need a mixing board or expensive software to see if a few superimposed tracks are going to work well together when i've been provided the tools for such a simple task for over a decade?

    16. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. You can do wondrous things with stereo plugs in your laptop, two good quality mikes and a 64studio distro.

      Its a very nice GNU/Linux flavour, unfortunately I had to ditch it because its basically crippled for general use. 1.1 Xserver, Abiword, and to top it all off GAIM instead of the newer, more stable and slicker Pidgin. It was back to ubuntu hardy for me. I was sad tho.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    17. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      why do i need a mixing board or expensive software to see if a few superimposed tracks are going to work well together when i've been provided the tools for such a simple task for over a decade?

      Because there is plenty of free mixing board software and what you propose to do with sndrec32 is more than a little masochistic.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dismissed at the pleading stage for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. There is no legal theory on this planet that would make a third party (even a disreputable one like the RIAA) responsible for the Dell's choice to include or exclude some features from a driver. Perhaps you could proceed in a fraud case against Dell IF somewhere they claimed stereo-mix as a feature or, and this is a huge stretch, general merchantability.

      More broadly, I suggest you stop thinking of the legal system is a cure-all for every practice you don't like. The law is not meant to be an all-encompassing tool for redressing every wrong but rather a minimal standard of civilized decency. While I'm no fan of the RIAA, and many of their tactics are indeed illegal (I'll let NYCL flesh those out), this particular odious act is still well within the law.

    19. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by gnuASM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What has been disabled is the loopback, which lets you record the music that the computer is playing. Youtube for example.

      Yeah, or even your own LEGALLY COPYRIGHTED drum/beat/synthesizer loops. Or even the audio off your home videos to use for your own LEGAL reuse in your own LEGAL compilation home videos. Or even your own LEGAL automated answering service that may need to record messages. Or any of a plethora of other LEGAL uses.

      As a poster has already stated, do NOT tell me how I should/can or shouldn't/cannot use MY hardware.

    20. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >why do i need a mixing board or expensive software to see if a few superimposed tracks are going to work well together when i've been
      >provided the tools for such a simple task for over a decade?

      You don't, and you're in the wrong argument.

      The stereo mix in nearly any consumer soundcard is pretty good. It's 16 bit/44.1kHz. Nothing wrong with capturing that.

      Of course, I'd like to see for myself whether Audacity fails to capture the sound device on the notebook in question.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    21. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about those that might want to put down demo/scratch tracks?

    22. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Or .... NYCL type.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    23. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jews are which race again?

    24. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, the perceived limitation would encourage high-quality recording by forcing artists to use more appropriate recording gear than a standard sound-card.

      What this actually does is the same thing Macs do: disable recording of what's being played on your computer through the sound card. Programs (and kernel extensions) get around this limitation on Mac, so I'm sure the same will happen on these Dells. The clumsy work-around is to plug a cable from your line-out to the line-in (sometimes amped for mic-in, too).

      This does not affect one's ability to, say, record several channels from a set of mics using a Presonus interface and Audition, editing the mix, and exporting the mix. You just can't use the shitty resampling and DA-conversion chain that is the "record from sound card out" option without additional tinkering.

    25. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by websitebroke · · Score: 1

      Speaking of YouTube, I record off of it all the time. There are a bunch of videos of musicians playing fiddle tunes, and I record them to help me learn the tune.

    26. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bastard race.

    27. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by neomunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Semetic, just like the Arabs are.

      Not that there's enough differentiation in the human genome between the 'races' to matter much, but you asked.

    28. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A troll modded insightful...

      It must be the jews!

    29. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you read a flamebait article on /. that has no basis?

    30. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by x2A · · Score: 0

      Insightful?!! How the hell is

      "It isn't about recording audio input from microphones, it is about making a copy of whats going out to the speakers"

      dictating how you may use your tools? It's not dictating anything, it's observing what the story is about! You idiot mods, I bet you're the types to rally behind out-of-context soundbites too because you don't understand the issues at hand. Really. Idiots.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    31. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by x2A · · Score: 1

      INSIGHTFUL?!!

      "or even your own LEGALLY COPYRIGHTED drum/beat/synthesizer loops"

      Why would you need soundcard drivers to record something you already have as a file?

      "Or even the audio off your home videos"

      Ditto.

      "Or even your own LEGAL automated answering service that may need to record messages"

      Why would you need an output recording facility to record some input?

      "As a poster has already stated"

      And you're about to jump on the straw-bandwagon...

      "do NOT tell me how I should/can or shouldn't/cannot use MY hardware"

      Why do you think that asking questions, or pointing out that this doesn't limit the things you're saying it does, is telling you what to do? Do you have such a problem with people telling you what to do that you see it everywhere, even where it doesn't exist???

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    32. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always true. some of the tools I use were designed for live performances, and do not have the facility to output to file. Even if you could, you'd still need to be able to hear the output in realtime to actually use the tools.

        Additionally, there are times where you may want to record the output of several tools or packages simultaneously. In these cases, going through the stereo mix is the easy option. Why do something in ten stages when one will do?

    33. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Or you could read the article and realise that no evidence for any sort of Dell fascism has actually surfaced... Voting with your dollars only makes sense if you are aware of all the facts. Otherwise innocent parties get twatted.

    34. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta agree with this.
      The loopback functionality is always done better in the audio/video production software.

      Exporting from the software to an audio file is such a common basic feature that you never use the soundcard's loopback.

      To say nothing of the fact that going through the soundcard's mixer might pick up extra noise from an open cd/mic/line in, and you have no idea of what it's doing to the audio bit depth.

      When doing the final mixdown bounce, it's also common sense to keep the path as simple as possible. Extra multiplications from going through a few faders in a cheap soundcard's mixer is definitely a no-no.

      One final note: if you really need it, you can still create an analog loopback with an audio cable anyway...

    35. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      What sort of idiot uses their sound card's line out to record youtube audio, when they could just download the flv using any one of 10 billion methods and run mplayer -dumpaudio on it to get the original mp3?

    36. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This explains the hate fetish!

      You think Twitter is a Jew.

      Intent on Slashdot Domination.

    37. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't try to dictate to me how I may, or may not, use my tools, thank you."

    38. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Idiots.

      When you sink to the level of personal insult, you give up any realistic participation in the discussion, and any point you may have made is ignored.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    39. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right that this feature shouldn't be disabled because of the few people that might illegally copy music using it.

      However, every single example you gave of legitimate reasons to use it is better done by recording in the playback app, rather than bouncing it through the sound card.

    40. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "and any point you may have made is ignored"

      yeah, ignored by idiots, if the only thing someone's saying is completely idiotic, it's not a far stretch calling them idiots.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    41. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by MacWiz · · Score: 1

      Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

      Merely selling them a Dell laptop would seem sufficient.

    42. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      "or even your own LEGALLY COPYRIGHTED drum/beat/synthesizer loops"

      Why would you need soundcard drivers to record something you already have as a file?

      Well if you knew anything about recording home audio on a PC, you'd quickly come across situations where it's useful. Stereo Mix is great for rerouting sound in between applications as well, so long as you're not too concerned about quality. I use it sometimes for streaming media. Things like justin.tv and so on all use the same basic technology which assumes that you have a web cam and a microphone. There's no other way to send your own audio. However if you want to place sound files or synth output (and yes I do have them, and I do perform live with them) or whatever from your machine into your broadcast, you have to use Stereo Mix basically to reroute out of application and into the "input" side of the streaming client.

      There, found you a legitimate use happy now?

    43. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "There, found you a legitimate use happy now?"

      Yep - but that's not so much just down to the validity of your point, but the difference in the way you made it. The post I was replying to was deliberately argumentative and offensive, accusational... and on top of all this, wrong... which all together inspired my response. Your post, being perfectly civilised, inspires in return, a civilised response.

      "Well if you knew anything about recording home audio on a PC, you'd quickly come across situations where it's useful"

      I have actually done a lot of production, but to release rather than as live set. With ReWire or vst, there's usually other ways of routing the audio without bouncing it off the soundcard, ways at least that have accommodated what I've needed to do.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    44. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair to me, I had considered putting a smiley after "happy now", because it was a little snarkey comment that was mostly there for humor. But no one ever seems to use them on slashdot.

      Hurray for rewire!

    45. Re:Why is RIAA asking this? by x2A · · Score: 1

      haha yes I had considered biting back on that "happy now" comment but with the context of the rest of the message I figured it was more likely meant slightly cheekily than offensively, and you had a valid point... relative to the so many posts on here that are pure rudeness with /no/ valid point :-) etc etc...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  4. boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe it's time to boycott the RIAA.

    1. Re:boycott by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, here is the thing. Anytime someone doesn't buy something from the RIAA, they automatically think that it is pirates. So they increase this sort of stuff. The RIAA has been used to a monopoly for so long, they don't know how to deal with a decrease in profit, so they blame someone else.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT DOWN! Insightful?

    3. Re:boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHY did this ignorant, racist crap get modded up?????

    4. Re:boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously suggesting that no one should boycott the RIAA for fear of the RIAA?

    5. Re:boycott by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      Way ahead of ya. Most of their stuff is total crap anyway.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    6. Re:boycott by Baseclass · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sigh... Although I don't agree with his sentiments, Judaism is not a race but a religion.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    7. Re:boycott by willyhill · · Score: 1

      Just in case it's not readily apparent, "vvillyhill" is not mini me.

      Here's a list of these accounts, if anyone is interested.

      --
      The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
    8. Re:boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm *certain* that the mouth-breathing idiot that posted the trollpost was well aware of the difference between judaism and jew when he wrote it...

    9. Re:boycott by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      No, I was saying that the expected result of boycotting the RIAA would be for the RIAA to stop all the court orders and such and focus on making good music. The actual result though, would be more lawsuits because they don't know how to deal with a loss in profit.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    10. Re:boycott by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      No, I was saying that the expected result of boycotting the RIAA would be for the RIAA to stop all the court orders and such and focus on making good music. The actual result though, would be more lawsuits because they don't know how to deal with a loss in profit.

      Except the RIAA will claim that if you aren't buying, you're pirating and there will be even more lawsuits and legislation to cover the drop in profit.

      The RIAA, along with their lawyers and puppets all need to be charged under RICO. Then what's left needs to be charged under the Sherman Anti-trust Act.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  5. Dell is getting pretty weak. by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see this as a symptom of Dell's decline. There was a time when Dell would have told anyone other than microsoft to get lost if they tried to dictate how they should do business.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by FilterMapReduce · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this ought to obliterate any remaining reputation for geek-friendliness that Dell may have acquired by selling computers pre-loaded with Linux. Of course, they mostly ruined it already by charging more money to not get Windows.

    2. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

      That or the RIAA is shelling out tons of money.

      You forgot...Money buys people in America.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    3. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was posted on Slashdot. Needless to say, the story is total bunk.

      Try to relax before knee-jerking to something you see here. Probably half of the damned stories here are blatantly false.

    4. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by eu4ik · · Score: 1

      That or the RIAA is shelling out tons of money. You forgot...Money buys people in America.

      In Soviet Russia, money buys you!
      Oh, wait....

    5. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Gogogoch · · Score: 1

      Please mod up....brilliant

    6. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that may be... but certainly Dell's "cred" for anything but a Windows lapdog and a mod-unfriendly assembler of Chinese parts has been thoroughly trashed over the years.

      I have a P2-400 from Dell that is _STILL_ running DSL 4.1. I can't vouch for the current lot of Dell's computers, but if the web (and my company's) comments on Dell's QC of their boxes are even 10% true, they've fallen FLAT.

      It's rather a sad state of things when the margins got so razor thin (mostly by Dell's own making), they simply became "just another builder"... and a shoddy one at that.

      YMMV, of course...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    7. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this as a symptom of Dell's decline. There was a time when Dell would have told anyone other than microsoft to get lost if they tried to dictate how they should do business.

      I see this as a symptom of Slashdot's decline. There was a time when Slashdot would have tried to confirm whether the RIAA was even involved (hint: they're not; it's a conspiracy theory) before posting this story.

      (Am I new here?)

    8. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Dell is just trying to boost Linux sales...

    9. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'd still rather buy a Dell than a HP that's loaded with so much crap software it takes an hour to boot the first time, and three hours to get to a usable desktop. Oh, and Dell at least includes the actual (i.e. crap-free) Windows CD with the system; HP's "restore disk" just re-installs the crap.

    10. Re:Dell is getting pretty weak. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      HP's always sucked. :) Dell's just recently started the "rock-bottom-and-started-digging" syndrome. :-)

      That's why no matter what PC you buy, you wipe and install a real OS on it. ...this is slashdot after all. ;)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  6. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dell colludes with MPAA, RIAA, and DRM activists -- removes CPU and hard drive to prevent copyright violations

    1. Re:In other news by nawcom · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they (and by they I mean the ones that claim to put copyright stickers on sound frequencies) are okay with CPUs and hard drives. it's the physical memory modules they have the problem with - so you'll have to buy your own. Which will probably be better, knowing how much more memory with "ACME Computer vendor" stickers stuck on them cost compared to the original manufacturers. Yes Dell and Apple, I mean you.

  7. packard bell? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the summary:

    Gateway and Pac Bell are the other two manufacturers to have bowed to RIAA at the expense of their customers' satisfaction and disabled stereo mix without warning."

    Is that the Packard Bell that so many of us loved to hate? Really, did they even reach the technological prowess of having stereo recording in their systems?

    I really thought their systems pretty well disappeared back in the mid to late 90s, and were buried in a junkyard with rusted-out Yugos somewhere.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:packard bell? by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Informative

      in the US yes, but in Europe they are still a major player.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:packard bell? by germansausage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just like David Hasselhoff!

    3. Re:packard bell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same Gateway Inc. that was bought out by Acer in 2007 and became a privately held company?

    4. Re:packard bell? by ShadowFalls · · Score: 2, Funny

      Packard Bell is the thing that holds up my desk. Best use I ever got out of one. Though its still shaky at times, I give it a boot every once in awhile. No power cord attached naturally :)

    5. Re:packard bell? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Wow, I've never been more happy to be an American.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    6. Re:packard bell? by Ironlenny · · Score: 1

      Packard Bell or the Yugo?

      --
      There is a system for subverting the system and you should use that system!
    7. Re:packard bell? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      in the US yes, but in Europe they are still a major player.

      Are you talking about Packard Bell, or the Yugos?

    8. Re:packard bell? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    9. Re:packard bell? by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      My first PC was a Packard Bell Pentium 100. It was slower than shit. In fact, I ended up buying a motherboard, case, and power supply for it eventually. Most of my lame benchmarking software was about twice as fast, and it was the difference with playing games. Of course, it was probably the cache on the new motherboard that the PB didn't have. However, that system worked with OS/2 warp, Windows NT, and Linux better than anything I've ever owned. That was redhat 5.0 though. They sucked, but they were generic enough to run damn near anything in the 90s.

    10. Re:packard bell? by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Oddly, here in the states I'm used to "pac bell" being shorthand for Pacific Bell, the former west coast baby bell. Packard Bell has always been used in the long form AFAICT.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    11. Re:packard bell? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      In fact, I ended up buying a motherboard, case, and power supply for it eventually.

      IIRC, Packard Bell charged absurd prices for those components, as I once drew up an estimate to repair one that was hit by lightning. I'm guessing therefore you likely (very wisely) bought none of those parts from them.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    12. Re:packard bell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the US yes, but in Europe they are still a major player.

      and yet they're still just as crap!

  8. Mobile? by zmjjmz · · Score: 1

    Should this be in YRO? This is still a non-story regardless.

  9. Recommendations? by dfay · · Score: 1

    I hate the idea of giving companies like this any more business, at least until they become very repentant and remember their one and only source of revenue.

    That said, I frequently get asked by relatives to recommend a computer they should buy. I've been in the habit of recommending Dell because they seem to be well built and inexpensive. I build all of my own because they are generally gaming machines, but it's just not worth it to build (and support to some degree) a PC for everyone that asks. And besides, I find that it's hard to beat the Dell deals any more unless you're building something special like a high-end gaming box.

    Anyway, does anyone have suggestions of good places to get pre-built PCs without supporting this kind of anti-consumer behavior?

    1. Re:Recommendations? by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      "one and only source of revenue."

      Other than advertisers and crapware?

      "Anyway, does anyone have suggestions of good places to get pre-built PCs without supporting this kind of anti-consumer behavior?"

      I hate to be "that guy" but, maybe Apple? I haven't ever tried on my Mini so I don't know if there is a way to record the mixer output.

    2. Re:Recommendations? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      http://www.cycling74.com/products/soundflower works pretty well for recording mac output.

      the mac mini kinda sucks though. they're priced WAY to high for what they are, they should be... $300. i'm VERY happy with my macbook though.

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    3. Re:Recommendations? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If someone asked me that, my advice: go to a computer store and ask them to assemble one for you. That will probably get you better prices and better quality parts than most "big name" computers.

    4. Re:Recommendations? by dfay · · Score: 1

      "one and only source of revenue."

      Other than advertisers and crapware?

      Good point. However I'd still argue that this is a secondary effect, because that revenue is going to end up being proportional to the direct consumer revenue.

      "Anyway, does anyone have suggestions of good places to get pre-built PCs without supporting this kind of anti-consumer behavior?"

      I hate to be "that guy" but, maybe Apple? I haven't ever tried on my Mini so I don't know if there is a way to record the mixer output.

      I should have mentioned that Apple isn't a viable choice. Not that there's anything wrong with that! It's just that it seems like all of my family are accustomed to PCs (although they call me when things go wrong...)

    5. Re:Recommendations? by dfay · · Score: 1

      This may be the route I take if I find the right place. Unfortunately, there are goons here (in Salt Lake City, UT) worse than Dell. One sleazy outfit called Totally Awesome Computers is at the top of that list.

      Surely there must be an online place with reasonably good support that doesn't cripple their products at the whim of the MAFIAA?

    6. Re:Recommendations? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, go ask them to assemble a laptop for you, which is the kind of computer this article is about...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. SHELVE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean "shell."

  11. Other options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well how very stupid. What exactly are they preventing people from recording? I mean, if it's internet radio (like pandora.com, aol radio, et al) you can just get something like Stationripper to record it. Or is this just to prevent people from recording their OWN CD's to a computer? Ummm.... isn't that a ok fair-use thing to be doing? Don't they have something BETTER to do then hassling legit uses of their music???

    1. Re:Other options... by megaditto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just guessing here, but one could rip iTunes Store recordings, or plays-for-sure (whatever the MS store is) tracks, or audible audio books just by playing them and capturing the high-quality PCM streams while it plays. Then convert into mp3 or whatever.

      Essentially, this would let you exploid analog hole without requiring any cables for line in/line out loopback. And since the waveform never leaves your sound card, the quality of the recording is near perfect.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Other options... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the input is not in a lossless state (already compressed) and the waveform you obtain has some noise on it, which, when compressing it again, will lead to a different result. You can try using an original recording, and compress it once. Keep that one, and use it to compress & compress & compress again, always at the same quality.

      Tell me the result after 20-30 compressions at the same bit rate.

    3. Re:Other options... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows XP users can also do this with TotalRecorder. Linux users don't care, because they're not using windows drivers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Other options... by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      mplayer seems to do the job just fine.
      mplayer -dumpstream -dumpfile stream.ogg url

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
  12. This is just another useless annoyance by ShadowWraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is true, what does the RIAA intend to gain from this? It won't stop or even discourage piracy. People recording streams or radio broadcasts do have easy access to simple tape recorders, and mass distribution pirates will simply use a different machine. All this does is annoy people and put a dent in Dell's sales. What is the point???

    1. Re:This is just another useless annoyance by bane2571 · · Score: 1

      even sillier, $5 cable from earphone jack to mic jack, problem solved.

      I'd be more likely to think this was just an under informed choice to make the built in mic less likely to clash with the sound output in anyway, thereby making the whole thing more user friendly.

    2. Re:This is just another useless annoyance by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      even sillier, $5 cable from earphone jack to mic jack, problem solved.

      No no no, problem not solved. I already moderated once in this discussion, but this is just too common an error.

      The earphone output is somewhat compatible with line levels and impedances, so it should go to the line-in. Of course, some computers only have a mic input. In that case you'll only get one of the two channels, only mildly distorted if you're lucky.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:This is just another useless annoyance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose is to stop you from bypassing DRM audio formats by capturing the PCM bit stream going into your sound card from the DRM playback software. Yes you can use a tape recorder, but that means messing up the audio by converting it to analog and back to digital again, introducing conversion losses.

  13. A lawsuit waiting to happen? by davidwr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Dell advertises "ACME sound chipset ABC123" but doesn't deliver all the features of that chipset, are they guilty of false advertising?

    Just asking.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:A lawsuit waiting to happen? by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Likely not. You would have to prove it was Dells intent to do this deliberately. From the sounds of it, Dell just kinda fucked up. That might entitle you to a rebate, refund or exchange but is unlikely to get you any punitive damages.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:A lawsuit waiting to happen? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No. If they advertise stereo mix and don't provide it, though, that's bait and switch. There is no law that says you have to implement all features of an included peripheral, even if it is onboard :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:A lawsuit waiting to happen? by rob1980 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno... the provider I bought my Motorola Razr phone from locked out the ability to load ringtones (or any other sound files) onto the phone through the microSD slot in their firmware, even though the phone is technically capable of that function. I can still use Motorola's software to copy the sound file directly to the phone's internal storage, which takes about as much work as the registry hack to restore the chipset's functionality detailed in the article. (That is, not much.)

      In both cases, technically the features haven't been "disabled" as much as are "not enabled" in the provided software. If cell phone carriers can get away with it, why not Dell?

    4. Re:A lawsuit waiting to happen? by Draconistarum · · Score: 1

      If so, then Verizon and its ilk should be guilty of falsely advertising because of the lock-in and crippling they do to their phones.

  14. I upgraded to XP and it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought a Dell XPS M1530 laptop back in February, it came with Vista and I couldn't use my brand spanking new laptop to record from my stereo mix into Audacity.

    The only fix was to either use the analogue hole, install the XP driver for the sound card (which caused crackling in the speakers), or to upgrade to Windows XP, which I've been using for the last 3 months now... it's a whole lot quicker now!

    I'm never buying a Dell ever again...

    1. Re:I upgraded to XP and it works... by nawcom · · Score: 0

      or to upgrade to Windows XP

      strong wisdom this AC has, very strong.

  15. What does Dell stand to gain? by Therefore+I+am · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scratching my head at this one. I can see that the Music Industry is still grasping at any tiny straw it can, but what gain for Dell? Did money change hands, or was there some coercion? I just don't get it. Any ideas on this.

    1. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by ameyer17 · · Score: 1

      Pure speculation here, but I think it went something like this

      RIAA: Disable stereo mix recording in your laptops or we'll sue
      Dell: OK, we'll disable that for you

    2. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Informative

      As it turns out, the editors are basing this on complete hearsay. Nobody knows if the RIAA were even involved in this.

    3. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An agreement to not be sued for selling high end music pirating hardware, you know, computers.

    4. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      Assuming this story isn't FUD, I don't get it either. However, the MAFIAA is certainly notorious for coercing manufactures into supporting crap like this.
       
      I know it's been said over and over again but the real pirates "ARRHHH Matey!", the one's actually mass producing and making profits from their spoils won't even bat an eye at whatever hairbrained scheme they come up with next. This only serves to annoy the consumer.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    5. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIAA is guilty untill proven innocent.
      It's how they work and how we need to treat them in return. guilty by default.

    6. Re:What does Dell stand to gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you give one other reason why this would be done if it isn't an anti-piracy measure?

      My Lenovo laptop is screwed like this and it drives me nuts

  16. TWITTER RIDES AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/~twitter/journal/206773

    Spread this far and wide so people know what he's doing!

    1. Re:TWITTER RIDES AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like our favorite troll finally lost it.

  17. This is the same dell that made you $200 for a by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    This is the same dell that made you $200 more for a better video card that only coasted $100 more in a store video card upgrade in the past so it may be more of dell ripping you off then the RIAA.

    1. Re:This is the same dell that made you $200 for a by prestomation · · Score: 1

      Sure, Dell rapes you on the upgrades, but the baseline is very nicely priced. I've seen other's comment, but it's just not even worth it to assemble your own machines if the baseline Dell's are enough. You can still upgrade the desktops if you want, of course.

      I bought a C2D laptop from Dell last fall. The Vostro line was new. They were the same exact cases as the Inspiron(still are), but were priced at like 60% of that other line with the same specs(!).
      Also, speaking of video upgrades. Right before I bought mine, a 8400M was $100 over the Intel, while the 8600M was $200 over(as you alluded to). But, strangely enough, the day I actually ordered the machine, the price stayed the same, while the 8400M became the baseline option and the 8600M being the $100 upgrade, which I was more then happy to pay for.

    2. Re:This is the same dell that made you $200 for a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be the most incoherent sentence i've ever seen on slashdot...

      And realistically, the cost of having Dell upgrade your video card in a desktop (NOTE: This article was about laptops), is barely any more than going to a big box store and picking it up. The upgrade cost to go from integrated video to a GeForce 8600GT is maybe around $200..the same price as it would be if you bought it from Best Buy. Online stores on the other hand, everything appears to be a ripoff in comparison. BFG Tech's 8600GT is like $80. XFX offers it for around $50 after mail-in rebate (at least it did 3 months ago)

  18. It's almost claustrophobic... by ibanezist00 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think that at the rate things are going, it's going to be illegal to listen to anything, at all, anywhere? And that recording devices will cease to exist for the consumer?

    Honestly, I don't see what the RIAA intends to gain from this. First off, there is always the analog hole, which makes DRM fundamentally impossible by principle. Secondly, you'd think that scandals like the Sony rootkit issue would make them realize that more restrictions hurt the legitimate consumer more than stop piracy. Thirdly, stereo mix recording actually has legitimate uses, and I've used it only for those kinds of purposes, personally.

    Honestly, the MAFIAA needs to just suck it up and realize that they're never going to stop this, and they're just hurting more legitimate consumers along the way. "Piracy" has been around since the existence of recording and copying devices, just that it has become more prevalent recently.

    --
    There are mountains to cross for those that are willing.
    1. Re:It's almost claustrophobic... by GuyverDH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Piracy to use the term loosely, hasn't become more prevalant. Sales are declining because they keep putting out garbage, with audio-compression schemes to increase volume and distortion levels.

      Then they wonder why they're losing money...

      Good gawd *IAAs, get a clue...

      --
      Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
    2. Re:It's almost claustrophobic... by ibanezist00 · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree, after readig what I posted, I realized I also forgot to say that a lot of stuff these days is crap, anyway.

      --
      There are mountains to cross for those that are willing.
  19. Blood thicker than water by rts008 · · Score: 1

    "That said, I frequently get asked by relatives..."
    Dude! where are your priorities? Family, or FOSS?

    I joke with the above- really. However, if you CAN enlighten then,then why not?

      The install of Ubuntu or (in my case) Kubuntu is both easier and faster than any version of Windows since Win 95. If you are unsure, then dual-boot is easy as long as Windows is installed first.

    Dual boot is your friend...until you learn better!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:Blood thicker than water by dfay · · Score: 1

      I do promote FOSS generally, but most of the people I know just stick with Windows.

      However, that's not even a concern here since we're talking about buying a PC, not just the software. Whether it's installing Linux or using some different Windows drivers that skirt around Dell's stupidity, I'm sure I could get around the actual limitations.

      But I don't want to give Dell any more money. I would much rather send business to a company that puts their customer before the RIAA thugs.

    2. Re:Blood thicker than water by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      Although I'm a huge Linux advocate, I just don't wanna have to support all of my family and friends PCs to that extent. My wife and kids are the exception. They are all happy Slackware users. They get to do their internet, email, and gaming. I get to keep their patches up to date or any other maintenance that may be required from the comfort of my own PC.

      No spyware, no malware, no viruses, etc. Sure I'll kick off rkhunter now and then just to make sure I haven't been rooted. Not once has it detected anything like that and my son installs all kinds of shit he finds on the internet.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
  20. Dell is late to the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that the KDE developers have been colluding with the RIAA for years. Their strategy in this case seems to be a "security through obscurity" approach. They don't physically prevent the user from doing anything, but the KMix dialog box always has a huge array of undifferentiated sliders and pushbuttons, different on each system, none of which are documented or clearly labeled. Over the years I've never been able to figure out how to do much of anything beyond clicking randomly until I hear some sounds. I certainly doubt that I would ever figure out how to make illicit recordings via the mixer hardware.

  21. dear riaatards: by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. anyone committed to do music piracy will commit music piracy and any software or hardware hurdles you throw up cannot stop them

    2. anyone committed to not do music piracy will be irritated by the software and hardware hurdles you throw up to stop music pirates

    congratulations for punishing your paying customers and doing nothing to stop music piracy

    fucking retards

    your business model is dead

    just die already

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:dear riaatards: by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Amen Brother. And said just right gusto. Screw em all, and eat the bossy ones.

  22. Sometimes... by nexuspal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish Slashdot had a mechanism to mod news stories into oblivion... Especially ones like this, with no real facts, and no basis in reality...

    --
    I've read Slashdot for the last 5 years, and now I start posting... Go figure :-P
    1. Re:Sometimes... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I thought the "Firehose" feature was for that? Didn't everyone's vote get this story to the front page in the first place, thanks to the firehose?

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    2. Re:Sometimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it called FireHose?

    3. Re:Sometimes... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Digg does..do you see quality articles based purely on fact sitting on their front page?

    4. Re:Sometimes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish Slashdot had a mechanism to mod news stories into oblivion... Especially ones like this, with no real facts, and no basis in reality...

      It'll never happen: Stories like this bring the spods and wannabes out in droves, which in turn generates revenue for Slashdot. Accuracy? WTF is that?

      Slashdot has become a laughing stock, especially with regards to the RIAA/MPAA stories it posts. They're just "stirring the pot" to get the kiddiez riled up and make money.

      Sadly, it works.

      Captcha: enablers

      Sounds about right.

  23. Use? by allanw · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How often is stereo mix actually used? People are overreacting; they think recording is disabled. That's ridiculous: tons of people use microphones, for gaming, voice chat, they couldn't afford to turn recording off. What is disabled is some boolean in the driver, not in the hardware that allows stereo mix to work.

    How many people even use stereo mix? You record what's playing through your speakers. Any decent sound editing program is going to have some kind of mixer that will combine your recording with whatever you were playing along with.

    The only use I see is for a program like FRAPS, which records your screen and sound.

    1. Re:Use? by allanw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry to reply to myself, but I forgot to add that Dell is not the only one that distributes drivers that disable stereo mix. Lenovo has these problems too:

      http://forums.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=Special_Interest_General&thread.id=316&view=by_date_ascending&page=1

      It's quite a popular thread, and Lenovo reps have posted too.

    2. Re:Use? by Annymouse+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      I used it often. I was dismayed when i found that my new motherboard does not have the feature :/

    3. Re:Use? by Wildclaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only use I see is for a program like FRAPS, which records your screen and sound.

      Exactly, and I for one am a person that uses that functionality to record stuff legally (voiced go lessons on the Kiseido Go Server to be exact). Heck, it is impossible to do it illegally as it falls under the same category as recording videos. Why should I be restricted from using my own computer as I wish.

      What I am really afraid of however is how these people are colluding by using a mix of cryptography and laws to prevent "unauthorized" equipment from being able to interface with the system. Right now I can always get another more free piece of equipment, but what about in 10-15 years when you can't run the software on anything but authorized hardware, and trying to bypass that is a federal offense.

      The above may be a nightmare to me, but for some rich people it is an utopian vision. I mean it when I say that I am afraid. Afraid because people tolerate minor restrictions being added all the time with just minor protests. It will become worse much worse and by the time people wake up it will be too late...again. Have you heard some of the people behind this. They are not acting as individuals but instead as lunatic powerhungry agents for powerful immoral organisations.

      And I used immoral instead of amoral deliberatly. Earning money is an amoral stance, but the idea of earning money above anything else is simply immoral.

    4. Re:Use? by LO0G · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's also funny is that typically the Stereo Mix functionality is implemented post-DAC. So when you're recording from stereo mix, the signal goes:

      Output->DAC->ADC->Stereo Mix

      So modulo electrical noise on the microphone and headphone jack, you get essentially the same result you'd get as if you went:

      Output->DAC->Headphone Jack-> $6.00 Cable->Line In Jack->ADC->Line In

    5. Re:Use? by billcopc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep it's ridiculous but true. For all you disbelievers, try recording "silence" on your Stereo Mix. Not so silent now, is it ?

      I actually hadn't used this feature in ages, but I did a few weeks ago to rip a friend's tune on some lame-ass artist site... the MP3 download was "disabled" and the guy wasn't answering his phone, so I just recorded the streamed output from my onboard sound. Hello noise! I was seeing -48db peaks, maybe -58db average; it's almost inaudible but still not what I expected.

      So just to be sure it wasn't the actual source file that was noisy, I did the same thing via my old M-Audio Audiophile 2496, using its "Monitor Mixer", and that one was perfectly clean. I would expect any card with an Envy24 chip to perform the same, as it does this virtual mixing at the digital stage, right on the chip.

      There used to be a nice "virtual audio cable" freeware, but Google only turns up some $30 whoreware offering that's clogging up the index.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Why should I be restricted from using my own computer as I wish

      Don't install Vista then.

    7. Re:Use? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      this MAY be only for the 'junk' cards like creative.

      yes, you heard me. creative resamples (!) to 48k. always. even if the input is ALREADY at 48k!

      historically, they have been evil like this.

      and so, its not surprising that you get resampled junk when you put silence on the input.

      also, while I'm on the subject, 'dolby digital LIVE' is also junk. it tried to convert regular stereo to '5.1' but it does some analog conversions (I'm pretty sure) where you should have an all digital chain. the fidelity is NOT there, its NOT good and should be avoided. if you have 2 channel audio, just LEAVE it as 2 channel and don't get caught in this marketing LIE about upsampling to 5.1 channel mode. you gain nothing good from that and the DD live chipsets are junk.

      good ones: cmedia (cmi) 8738 series. better one: envy24 chipset. those do NOT resample and are bit-perfect.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Use? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that - just this morning I used HDOgg to record an interview which was only available as a radio stream. HDOgg is a freeware app which will divert audio (in this case, yes, from stereo mix) into an Ogg or MP3 file for later consumption.

      I'm not trying to do anything iffy with the interview - I just want to listen to it later, in my car.

    9. Re:Use? by Spacejock · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is the one I use:

      http://www.fridgesoft.de/downloads.php

      "UPDATE: HarddiskOgg is now Open Source, the source code is available on SourceForge."

      It says it's not for streaming audio, but it worked on the radio interview I mentioned above.

    10. Re:Use? by x2A · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unbeliever here, so just tried it. Perfect digital silence. [Relatively] old dell laptop (D505) with SigmaTel C-Major low end sound card.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    11. Re:Use? by xalorous · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think MS may have snuck this one in, intentionally or unintentionally, when they configured the Windows default soundcard drivers for these cards.

      BTW, I have a Dell laptop with the mentioned sound card embedded. I have never had any issues with using my microphone.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    12. Re:Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard some of the people behind this. They are not acting as individuals but instead as lunatic powerhungry agents for powerful immoral organisations.

      For some reason, many organizations change the newly recruited after a some time of service. Especially many goverment officials are suffering from bizarre ideas of tax payers money as their own. Service disappears, abuse rises.

    13. Re:Use? by LordVader717 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jst thought I'd add a link for anyone who has a card with this chipset.

      I'd hae had to give out many times the price if I wanted the same functionality from a creative card.

    14. Re:Use? by kipman725 · · Score: 1

      creative havn't always been bad the AWE64 was a very nice card at the time and the current cards (although having other problems) can be quite easily made to not resample.

    15. Re:Use? by melstav · · Score: 1

      but what about in 10-15 years when you can't run the software on anything but authorized hardware, and trying to bypass that is a federal offense.

      Then those of us who still care will go in search of alternatives for the restrictive software. And if Windows happens to be one of the more oppressive programs, you may find more people migrating to Linux or BSD. And as a result, more developerssupporting those OSes.

    16. Re:Use? by squizzar · · Score: 1

      That may be necessary in order to synchronise the audio. The 48Khz input source might not be exactly synchronous with the output and hence has to be resampled.

      Take for example: you want to mix together a digital input at 48KHz and the microphone input. The 48KHz input is driven by a clock in whatever is providing the signal. The microphone is sample using a clock generated by the soundcard. These two clocks will be fractionally different, which will cause problems with under/over flow of data across the clock domains, which would result in some distortion every few seconds. The ideal solution is to make all the system clocks synchronous - effectively genlocking, so that all sampling and output is driven by the same clock source. This is not an option on most consumer devices, and hence the _only_ solution that will lead to audio playback with no distortion is to sample rate convert, even if it's between two 48KHz sources that are running at marginally different rates. If the clocks differ by 1 ppm then you still have an extra second of samples every 20.8 seconds.

      I agree it's not the best option, but it is probably the most sensible given their market. You want to able to do fully synchronous digital audio you need some professional kit that lets you drive its internal clocks from a single source. Something like a: http://www.lynxstudio.com/lynxl22.html should do the job.

    17. Re:Use? by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      Right now I can always get another more free piece of equipment, but what about in 10-15 years when you can't run the software on anything but authorized hardware, and trying to bypass that is a federal offense.

      Don't hang up. We don't have to talk about the Matrix. We can talk about... stuff. Bands you like, girls we've dated, the Matrix...

      This being said, they can take away my open source OS from my cold, dead fingers.

    18. Re:Use? by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How many people even use stereo mix? You record what's playing through your speakers. Any decent sound editing program is going to have some kind of mixer that will combine your recording with whatever you were playing along with.

      My friend has a Dell, and for some reason you can't burn CDs with EAC on it. What we wind up doing when we're putting our LPs on CD is burn the .wav to CD as a data CD, then I take it home and burn it as a music CD. Oddly, his Dell will let you copy music CDs with no problem. So ironically, "fair use" is disabled while copyright infringement is not.

      And unless by "speakers" you mean your guitar amp, if you are recording your speakers with a microphone you're doing it wrong. See an article I posted on K5 a few years ago, How to rip from vinyl or tape.

      Dell is not the only one that distributes drivers that disable stereo mix. Lenovo has these problems too

      So if Ford Crown Victorias explode when hit in the rear, it's OK for Chevy to make exploding cars? Your logic is quite faulty there.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    19. Re:Use? by croddy · · Score: 1

      It would help if SOMEONE SOMEWHERE had noted that Dell has disabled recording of the stereo mix; obviously it has not disabled the stereo mix itself; they might as well just rip the sound card out and throw it away. The way this article and everything it links to are written, it is as though Dell has disabled the stereo output on its sound cards.

    20. Re:Use? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      That may be necessary in order to synchronise the audio. The 48Khz input source might not be exactly synchronous with the output and hence has to be resampled.

      the SIMPLE fact that they don't ALL do it (2 chips I mentioned do not do this) - that means there is no TECH reason for this.

      MS defined (I think it was MS) the standard at 48k. this was back when cd's were (still are) 44.1. the anti-home recording shit we had to put up with 10+ yrs ago is the reason the 'pros' kept 44.1 for themselves and the consumer industry TRIED to force a resampling just to ruin our own home recorded audio. seriously - there is no other reason to 'lock' at 48k when the input can just float based on the clock freq seen. its just a PLL! its no big deal!

      only 'pro' cards could really input at 44.1. they all should have been able to output 44.1, too, but again, they are trying to hobble our ability (this dates from 10+ yrs ago, still).

      its silly now since you can do a software resample in less than realtime on today's cpus - but historically they wanted to 'prevent' us from making cd copies.

      its always an arms race with the 'entertainment' industry. its one of the most hated industries, sadly, too.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    21. Re:Use? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      also, you are mixing concepts (heh).

      what you are describing, in pro audio, is a clock 'wire' as well as a data 'wire'. on spdif, its self-clocking (as they say) and you have to derive the clock from the data. when you have multichannel audio, you want a SMPTE 'clock reference' or something to be a clock master. then all your data will be pure data and your reference clock will keep all the bits in time, in parallel.

      you don't need or even want this for home audio (2 channel spdif). its not at all related to the 44.1 or 48k stuff. not at all.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:Use? by trjonescp · · Score: 1

      So if Ford Crown Victorias explode when hit in the rear...

      Have we just discovered the Achilles' heel of Cops?!

      --
      Only speak when it improves the silence.
    24. Re:Use? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, what can't you do on Vista in terms of DRM?

      Record video? Record audio? Rip CDs? Rip DVDs? Rip Blu-Ray? Wait, you can do all of this.

      Can't watch HDCP through a non protected path? Wait, you mean the same way you can't do that on OS X or Linux now, either?

      Trolling blowhard. And even worse, you're "informative", my ass.

    25. Re:Use? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Are you certain that it was recording *only* the streaming audio? With both of my soundblasters, Live and Audigy, if I use "What You Hear" as a recording source, I have to make sure that CD output as well as mic, line-in, mic2/line-in2 are all muted. Each of them gives a faint noise that will add to the recording. Using "wave" as a recording source instead, there is no noise beyond what is actually being processed in the wave driver. Recording silence this way results in true silence, the whole wave is completely flat at 0. You get the same thing recording from "What You Hear" as long as every output but "wave" is set on mute.

    26. Re:Use? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Only if you drive wearing what race car drivers wear. And cops ahead of me don't bother me; it's when their in my rearview mirror I get nervous.

      A rear mounted EMP would probably be more useful than a radar detector.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    27. Re:Use? by protolith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So if Ford Crown Victorias explode when hit in the rear, it's OK for Chevy to make exploding cars? Your logic is quite faulty there."

      I think the point flew past you faster than an exploding Ford... I read that statement as Dell is not the only one pulling this shit, its a bigger problem than just with Dell.

      Or to recycle your car analogy, If Ford makes exploding cars and Chevy also makes exploding cars, it's not used as justification, but as a statement that Automakers make exploding cars.

      It illustrated the extent of an issue.

    28. Re:Use? by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      If the clocks differ by 1 ppm then you still have an extra second of samples every 20.8 seconds.

      Ouch! That's some bad math. Should be "a single extra SAMPLE every 20.8 seconds"

      To be off by an extra second of samples it would take a MILLION seconds @1ppm, or 11.5 days!

      If the clocks differ by 1ppm then one clock would be at 48KHz and the other would be at 48000.05 Hz! It would take 20.8 seconds before they were off by one SINGLE sample. Let alone 1 second worth of samples. Just omitting the extra sample entirely would be totally unnoticeable by the best listener.

    29. Re:Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very likely depends on the type and age of the sound card.

      Once apon a time, CD drives in computers were internally connected to the soundcard using a short audio cable. While it would make sense to do this digitally, it was normally analog.

      Hence, the loopback recording would have to be taken from the post D/A analog mixer to enable recording from an audio CD.

    30. Re:Use? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      If they pass enough new laws, that is exactly what they will be doing.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    31. Re:Use? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Yep I had muted everything, it made absolutely no difference. Mind you, I can hear the same color of noise if I crank up the gains on my mixer... this is for my onboard audio (ADI1988A, I believe). The DACs pick up all sorts of garbage from the computer, very noticeable if I'm running any graphically-intensive process since the audio chip is right next to the first PCI-E slot.

      That noise is the main reason why so many people are moving to outboard Firewire-hosted audio interfaces. Move the DACs outside the PC chassis, and the noise is gone, plus you can shield the hell out of a rackmount chassis when all it houses is a teeny weeny sound card.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  24. Because they are probably not.... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this to prevent home grown artists from recording their own high quality material?

    Basically we are talking about Dell screwing up one driver to which people are ascribing various conspiracy theories. If you are actually read any of the blogs they are all just speculating and pointing to each other. Some of the more serious blogs outright say it is just random speculation, but that does not stop them from spreading the FUD. Something tells me if Dell made some secret deal, this would affect ALL of their computers, not just ones based on specific chipset. They wouldn't be selling alternative audiocards, and they would not be posting workarounds all over the place.I think that old variation of Occam's razor applies - "don't attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity." Its not the first driver Dell screwed up - its not going to be the last. This one just happened to somewhat fit into a conspiracy theory.

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    1. Re:Because they are probably not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This does apply to most of their computers. Our office has Dell Dimension E520s, Optiplex 320s, several models of Latitudes and several models of Inspirons, all of which have exactly this problem. Some of them have the Sigmatel audio systems described in the article, while others have Intel HDA and Analog Devices sound devices, so it's a lot more widespread than even this article mentions.

    2. Re:Because they are probably not.... by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 1

      Any sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from stupidity.

    3. Re:Because they are probably not.... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Basically we are talking about Dell screwing up one driver

      then why is this happening on other chipsets and other laptops (lenovo, for example)?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  25. Really? Is this a big huge problem? by Runefox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just use the non-Dell drivers. If it's a Sigmatel, download a Sigmatel driver from somewhere else for the same chipset. Use Everest or something to report what chipset it actually is, and just go get someone else's driver. I've dived through the .INF files for some of these, and this kind of thing is something you can enable/disable directly within there, if you were so inclined and knew where to look (and had the time and patience to change it in about six different places in the same file). It's actually pretty easy to figure out if you're used to looking at config files, even if it really is a different beast.

    --
    Screw the rules, I have green hair!
    1. Re:Really? Is this a big huge problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point isn't that it's a big problem, or a small problem, or a solvable problem.

      The point is, that it is a problem that was caused ON PURPOSE.

      Your blindness in missing that is pretty bad. I'll never use any software you write, that's for sure. No reason to give any credibility to any bug reports you file, if you don't understand what makes this bug different from the others.

    2. Re:Really? Is this a big huge problem? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      If the problem is Dell's drivers, does this exist on their Ubuntu boxes? With the source available it should be relatively easy to prove exactly how Dell purposefully and unnecessarily harmed their own product, as well as easy to find exactly what needs to be done to get it working.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    3. Re:Really? Is this a big huge problem? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      If the problem is Dell's drivers, does this exist on their Ubuntu boxes?

      I doubt it. According to the link the "fix" to the "hardware problem" involves editing a .inf file so that a flag is set to 0 instead of 1.

      Companies selling cut-down versions of products at a lower price isn't new and isn't surprising, and it isn't just the computer industry that does it - "value to a customer" (i.e. what someone can charge) doesn't necessarily match manufacturing cost.

      For example, if I go to a garage and buy a car, the chances are that the same engine is available in different models with a different engine map (and consequently different power output) for vastly different money.

      I'm typing this on a Dell with SigmaTel audio (look - it was cheap, OK?) and have had no problems recording sound* any way I've tried under an old Suse Linux version.

      *old LPs, if you're wondering - so you can get that authentic crackle on an MP3 player too.

  26. Firehose by pavon · · Score: 1

    Slashdot does have a way to moderate stories. I don't know if they would ever pull a story off the front page if it got a low enough ranking - not enough people use it to tell.

    1. Re:Firehose by fyoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I submitted a story that didn't make it beyond blue in the firehose, but which was selected for one of the subsections. I submitted another which made to red, and it wasn't selected.

      Firehose popularity may be something editors consider, but it is by no means the deciding factor. This story is on the front page because an editor thought it ought to be there.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
  27. I just wanted to say... by DrWinston0Boogie · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... that I encountered this issue just yesterday for the first time on a new Dell laptop (with SigmaTel sound) when I needed to record from the stereo mix -- for lawful uses, mind you.

    I did some googling of my own and found other users who located a Dell driver (R171789) for XP that can be installed in Vista using the XP-SP2 compatibility mode option. I found this driver, installed it as prescribed, went into Vista's Recording Devices, told it to show and enable all disabled devices, and boom, there was my stereo mix. So far I have been recording without any issues.

    So yeah, without question it sucks that I even had to go through that, but it took me 10 minutes of research and even less than that to enable and configure.

    I hope this helps somebody.

    1. Re:I just wanted to say... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      The people who controll your computer will find ways to disable this again...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  28. They caught me! by cerelib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks like they are going after people like me. I don't like buying CDs because the markup is absurd and I don't feel like contributing to that industry. When I like an artist, I will typically checkout things like their MySpace( or PureVolume if that is still going ) and listen to their songs. If I wanted to load that on to my computer or portable player, I simply fired up Audacity, selected the Mix as a source and recorded it as it played. Yes, I know that this will produce the lowest fidelity recording short of recording over a phone line, but for most of these songs I simply don't care. It is clear enough for my casual listening enjoyment.

    Here is the kicker though; if I couldn't do that, I still would not buy the CD. On the contrary, being able to sample music like this brings me closer to caving in and buying a CD( but I typically only buy used CDs because I am more willing to pay the discounted, still marked up price when I know the profit goes to the small business, so suck on that secondary market RIAA ).

    1. Re:They caught me! by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "( but I typically only buy used CDs because I am more willing to pay the discounted, still marked up price when I know the profit goes to the small business, so suck on that secondary market RIAA )"

      Never fear, that's next on the agenda

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
  29. Windows XP? Didn't he say "OS X"? by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Oddly enough the screenshot feature of Mac OS X is disabled when you are playing a DVD"

    Indeed he did. What's with the all the Windows XP work-arounds? They're valid, mind you.. for Windows XP; but that's not going to help for OS X?

  30. Record streaming audio? by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know, there's streaming audio rippers.. of sorts. Some of them actually -using- the stereo mix recording method themselves!
    The ones that don't aren't exactly user-friendly... and yes, from the viewpoint of my folks, hitting record in one app (Audacity, for the curious), then hitting 'play' in the streaming audio component on a website, makes tons of sense and is easy enough to understand. From there they can save to MP3, OGG, whatever.. without having, say, a nice copy of a realmedia file in realmedia proprietary format that then has to be fed through some command-line conversion utility and ... I lost them at 'rip the audio', really.

    Oh, and I've used it to record two-way voice communications in the past; nowadays apps tend to have functionality for that built-in.

  31. Re:Windows XP? Didn't he say "OS X"? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Indeed he did. What's with the all the Windows XP work-arounds? They're valid, mind you.. for Windows XP; but that's not going to help for OS X?

    OSX is going to be a bit trickier, because you're fighting Apple's DRM instead of some technical limitation as with Windows XP.

  32. Oh I've supported this by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    As a previous tech support agent - I've seen this in the field...

    "why can't I record internet radio anymore on my new expensive vista system?"

    "Well, lets take a look at the sound settings.

    hmmm... Creatives driver gui (as one example) doesn't let you mixdown anymore. Obvious feature.

    It seems you can't. Sorry. "

    Dell doesn't write software and doesn't make the hardware.

    Buy it Ubuntu anyways.

  33. What editors? by dreamchaser · · Score: 0

    Calling /. 'editors' editors is like calling an eight year old with ADD a doctor.

    1. Re:What editors? by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm eight and have ADD, you insensitive.. LOOK! A BUNNY!

    2. Re:What editors? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Timothy, is that you????

    3. Re:What editors? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm eight and have ADD, you insensitive.. LOOK! A BUNNY!

      That's supposed to be "PONIEZ" get it right.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:What editors? by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      You know what ADD stands for, right? Attention Deficit...hey! Let's ride bikes!

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    5. Re:What editors? by orasio · · Score: 1

      But PONIEZ are not free.
      BUNNIEZ, on the other hand... http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/

  34. Had to use another driver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My precision 390 was missing stereo mix and mic boost. I just downloaded the driver from the audio chipset manufacturer and was all set.

  35. Maybe so... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    "AKAIK the DVD plays in an "overlay" layer... it's not rendered to the player's window like normal windows graphics but it's rather placed on top of it (in a similar fashion to directX, I assume). That would explain why screen captures (which must work at windows UI graphic level) don't capture DVD or divX frames." ...Yet, freeware/shareware utilities like Capture Me have no issues whatsoever taking screen shots of such content entirely at run time without requiring any additional drivers to facilitate this ability. It's not that Apple's screen shot tools can't/couldn't do this, it's simply been designed specifically not to do it as a trade-off for having an MPAA approved DVD player as part of Mac OS X.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Maybe so... by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      The easiest way to get a screen capture in Windows is to get a handle to the "desktop window", access its' DC (device context) and save it as a BMP (or whatever format you can write to)... but I assume that the overlay layer wouldn't be captured because the DC exists at windows-ui-graphics level (i.e. it's slow). ... Capturing a frame off of a video playing in the overlay layer it's probably no big mistery... I assume you could intercept it through the DirectShow API... or whichever graphics layer gives access to the overlay layer.

      I don't know if it's possible or easy to compose the windows (i.e. DC) layer with the overlay layer to provide a complete screen capture... but it's certainly extra programming and extra hassle. No surprise they didn't do it.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
  36. Sadly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Nobody knows if the RIAA were even involved in this.

    Yeah, but the RIAA is already boned because most of us have no trouble believing that they are due to all the crap they've pulled in the past.

    After all, why would Dell disable this to begin with? None of this makes sense.

  37. Re:Hi twitter by willyhill · · Score: 0, Troll

    #12 actually. And thanks again...

    --
    The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
  38. Lenovo ThinkPads also have a disabled waveout by Hollinger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just got a new T61p through the upgrade program at work, and spent literally hours a few nights ago trying to figure out how to re-enable this function.

    I use it for one reason only: I call into telecons from our VOIP client, and record them so I can post them online internally as MP3s (along with meeting minutes) for those that miss the discussion. I dial in from my phone, dial in again from the laptop, hit record in Audacity, and have the whole thing recorded and done.

    I'm really quite annoyed because this simple function won't prevent pirates from pirating audio. Clever folks will always figure out a workaround.

    And yep, I'm an IBMer. I work in Power Systems development (Power 575, 595, etc., NOT at Lenovo). There's even one or two random posts on our intranet message boards mentioning that folks couldn't get this to work on the latest systems, but no one's posted a solution.

    This is a common problem on Analog Devices SoundMax Digital HD audio chips. I was able to modify the INF file for the SoundMax driver to give me the GUI option to record the audio, but when I select that device, it records nothing, so obviously something else isn't quite correct.

    At least I'm not the only one with these problems. Hopefully if enough people make a fuss, AD will re-enable this function.
    ~ Mike

    1. Re:Lenovo ThinkPads also have a disabled waveout by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Possible it's just an engineering decision. Maybe their new chips don't have the electrical links to feed output back to input. Or perhaps their chips now do, but they are cutting it out in the future and they don't want people bitching about new chips having less functionality. Now it might seem silly, why cut out a few small components? However, this kind of thing happens in mass production items that are designed for minimal costs. I've recorded talks (one of them from a guy at AD who is real good at this kind of thing) from EE guys who talk about redesigning circuits to eliminate a couple resistors and such. When every component uses more silicon, more silicon equals more cost, and you are counting fractions of pennies, you cut what can be cut.

    2. Re:Lenovo ThinkPads also have a disabled waveout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Total Recorder from http://www.highcriteria.com. I've successfully used it to enable recording of audio streams on my R61. Apparently it grabs the stream before it hits the soundcard and reroutes to its on recorder/player.

      If you look on the Thinkpad forums, this has been an issue since around March (AFAIK). According to what people have been able to find out from Lenovo tech support, the Wave Out loopback is disabled in hardware. Yes, you can fool the driver into putting the Stereo Mix option back in as a recording source, but the hardware simply won't send anything to it.

    3. Re:Lenovo ThinkPads also have a disabled waveout by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      Possible it's just an engineering decision.

      It's definitely an engineering decision, in my opinion. That's why I'm wondering just what parts got no-pop'd or what pins need to be reconnected.

  39. -1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No you're not. Quartz isn't that far removed from Windows GDI or X Windows when it comes to video overlays; they all use them because it's so much faster than writing pixels to a software window and then flipping the buffer.

    Every modern video system uses hardware overlays to render video whenever its available, period. And since every video card since the mid 90s supports hardware overlay, there's little or no reason not to do so.

  40. If true, it is a matter for the FTC & State At by grolaw · · Score: 1

    If they are selling machines advertised to perform X function and X function has been disabled (not a bug) then the FTC (WWW.FTC.GOV) and your state attorneys general have a big-fat deceptive trade practices action.

  41. Vote with your dollars. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    As I keep repeating time and time again, businesses like Dell depend on your money to stay in business. Therefore, when a business does something you appreciate, you should think of that business when you're on the market for whatever product or service it sells and support that business. And when a business does something contrary to what you appreciate, you should likewise do the opposite. It helps to actually write to the folks in charge of sales and marketing and let them know, politely, of course, the reason that you have purchased from their competitor.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:Vote with your dollars. by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      It's just like democracy -- you get to choose your own slave master from a choice of professional politicians. Here you have to choose between one big business or another -- and if all big businesses pander to the RIAA, you're stuffed. You don't really have that much choice.

      --
      John_Chalisque
  42. Disabling hardware features in software... by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Are you sure it wasn't collusion with Creative Labs rather than the RIAA?

  43. User-moderation of articles by Cynic.AU · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is simply a pointer - a giant, *&@off red neon pointer at that - to the fact that users need to be able to moderate /. articles up or down. If the body politic deems an article to have low 'truthiness' then it should say so in giant *&^@off red neon writing. :)

    But perhaps our benevolent dictators would be scared of la revolucion?

    !

    1. Re:User-moderation of articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the admins really human here? How can trash like this get posted as "News for Nerds"?
        I mean, how in good conscience, can someone do this? Do the admins just go off a gut feeling that this stuff is actually true or substantiated somewhere? /. is such a whore sometimes..

      Sales guy from very obscure company X is in office Monday to pitch brand new product. "We're putting out a press release Friday, you guys are among the first to hear about it, this is very disruptive technology." ... 30 minutes of sales gimmickry, up is down, down is up, the sun is blue. Yay... another storage startup with a "DMX killer" at only 1/100th the price (and appears to be a cheap Clariion knockoff.)
      Friday afternoon, I tune into Slashdot, and
      Lxy writes "X Unveils Disruptive Storage Technology"
      "After X purchased Foo's Advanced Storage Architecture division, rumors circulated around what they were planning to do with their next-generation SAN. Today at Storage Network World, X answered the question. The result is quite impressive, a SAN that can practically heal itself, as well as prevent common failures. There's already hype in the media, with much more to come. The official announcement is on X's site."

      Rumors? Hype? Who the hell are these people?
      Thanks Slashdot, you cheap bitch.

      I mean, it's mildly interesting and all, but it got me thinking how often does this scenario play out on Slashdot?
      This shit is not newsworthy...

  44. Dell XPS 630 with X-FI ExtremeGamer by UnahaClosp · · Score: 1

    I've tried a bunch of different drivers and choosen the "Show disabled devices" option in the audio settings. I still don't have wave out or "what you hear". Anyone got any idea how to fix that? Are there some beta drivers perhaps? All the other solutions seem to be related to other sound cards. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Dell XPS 630, Vista 64 Ultimate (All latest drivers and updates), Core 2 Duo E8500, 4GB 800MHz DDR2, SLI 8800GT, SB X-FI Xtreme Gamer

  45. Same with Asus Laptop and Hercules USB sound chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have experienced a similar problem with an Asus W7J Laptop, that had a stereo mic input which was "transformed" to Mono after some Windows XP upgrades.

    So I bought a Hercules USB sound chip which clearly advertised "stereo recording" (and had one stereo mic input), and of course it worked only as mono... That's just fscking great, ain't it? Crippled hardware, crippled software, and false advertising.

  46. Wouldn't work by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah, that would make Slashdot outright unusable. I mean, half the headlines would be identical then. Can you imagine trying to find anything? ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  47. So why did Dell disable it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We have one hypothesis that fits the data.

    Do you have a different hypothesis? Or just denial?

    1. Re:So why did Dell disable it? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Ummm.... a bug? Misconfiguration? Occam's Razor, my friend.

  48. The Slashdot FUD Machine by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    God forbid the RIAA should start browsing Slashdot for ideas.

  49. No, it's a Timothy special by theolein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article was posted by Timothy, who is the same idiot who posted the article above this one on claiming but not claiming "criminal negligence".

    The articles are pure flamebait, utterly stupid, typical of Timothy, and are simply sensationalistic crap designed to raise hit counts on slashdot.

  50. Re:well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -alu

    Did your parents tell you why they named you Arithmetic Logic Unit?

  51. Dell did that years ago already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Back then I had similar issues with my old Inspiron 8200 laptop. The default drivers weren't able to

    - set the recording source to anything else than "Mic In"
    - and routing the microphone input to the output

    Similar to other posts the solution was simple: Find generic chipset/AC97 driver, install it, done. This even got me rid of much of the laptop's background noise as apparently Dell left some unused analog inputs at full volume and one was able to hear the IrDA port every few seconds.

    Eventually I figured out the reason why they did this:
    - If an idiot accidentally changes the recording source, (s)he will inevitably call Dell support with "my microphone doesn't work anymore"
    - And if an idiot accidentally puts the internal mic to the internal speakers... Well. Go figure.

    So Dell have been crippling their drivers for years now because some of that functionality may render your computer "broken" and they simply don't want the hassle.

    And yes, that sucks, but this one time the RIAA definitely doesn't have to do with it IMO. :)

  52. It's a VISTA thing by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this thread http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=insp_audio&message.id=43688#M43688 the stereo mix drivers that Dell was supplied by SigmaTel (now Freescale Semiconductor) are being rejected by Vista on installation. The techs are working on it, but odds are SignaTel (not Dell) is being threatened by RIAA as not to supply the fix.

    http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/66120/Correct_Sigmatel_audio_drivers_Stereo_Mix#
    http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=insp_audio&thread.id=40127&jump=true

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  53. shelve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "shelve out $99"

    I thought the expression was "shell out".

  54. Allegedly...? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Ariticle:
    Dell Allegedly Colludes with RIAA, Stereo Mix Disabled without Forewarning

    Slashdot:
    Dell Colludes With RIAA, Disables Stereo Mix

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  55. If you are a musician by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope you'd buy a soundcard that doesn't blow to record your stuff. Internal laptop cards are noisy as hell. Get yourself a nice firewire card. Much, much, much better converters, and their drivers suffer from no limitations.

    Seriously, while this is a dumb move by Dell, any righteous indignation by musicians tells me that either:

    1) They don't know much about recording.

    2) They are just generating false rage for the purpose of hating on the RIAA.

    If I find that the RIAA has managed to outlaw soundcards with high quality inputs, I'll be right there with you in being angry. However as it stands any good 3rd party soundcard, even consumer grade cards from places like Creative, will record anything you like and will route signals digitally internally however you like.

    So please, leave off with this. If it really is a concern for you as a musician, get an Echo Audiofire or an M-Audio Firewire Solo. After all, you spent hundreds, or more likely thousands (possibly tens of thousands) on your instrument, you can swing $200 for a good soundcard. If you are just pretending to get worked up to hate on the RIAA then stop. It is silly not only in and of itself but because, as noted, there's no proof they were involved at all,

    1. Re:If you are a musician by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Internal laptop cards are noisy as hell.

      But in this case they've suppressed recording the driver's buffer before it passed through the converter.
      That's not "noisy as hell", it's purely digital without interference, even in systems with the worst audio
      devices.

      But the point isn't technology or quality; the point is, who may exert control over the means of production of the end-user's creative work?

      It's simply amazing how much support is given to parties like RIAA and Dell here on slashdot when the topic presents an opportunity to ridicule someone.

      Unified movement, indeed.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:If you are a musician by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >So please, leave off with this. If it really is a concern for you as a musician, get an Echo Audiofire or an M-Audio Firewire Solo.

      Did you even read my messages?

      I have a Studer desk, an Iz Radar, a professionally treated room, (clients!), etc., etc., and my objection to some corporation trying to control my ability to use a consumer device in a certain way, stands.

      Don't talk to me about alternatives, as if that eliminates the confrontation and exonerates the RIAA somehow.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  56. Collusion is such a weighted word by Zorque · · Score: 3, Insightful

    n. A secret agreement between two or more parties for a fraudulent, illegal, or deceitful purpose.

    That doesn't really sound like what's going on here. Maybe Dell relinquished a little more choice in the matter than they should have, but Michael Dell isn't sitting behind a curtain wringing his hands over this one. Try "cooperates", it's much less FUD-filled.

  57. Don't worry by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine trying to find anything? ;)

    Don't worry, you'll still be able to find what you're looking for using the tag system.
    Almost every article is tagged on /., that's the small word you see under the summary like "yes", "no", "..

    ...well, ok. I see your point.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  58. Don't even think about it by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    given that my forgery was printed on normal paper, it was certainly not very convincing. The clerk at the grocery store accepted it (the 50 kr side) as payment until I stopped and told him to look once more.

    Depending on where you live, that could be a very stupid idea, joke or not, regardless of whether you tell the person straight off. There's always going to be some kneejerk idiot who wants to shop you anyway (either they won't care that you told them, or they'll interpret it as you trying to get off the hook when you realised you'd done something stupid, or whatever) and a prosecution that will distort the situation and paint it as badly as possible so that you get 40 years under anti-forgery laws (reduced to 25 with plea-bargaining).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  59. Don't doubt it for a minute by gx5000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stop buying name Brands for love's sake.
    They are simply cheaped out version of generics.
    The same Asus motherboards and cards with swapped out or missing chips.
    Go the extra mile and have one built or be adventurous and build one yourself, or find a 16 year old.

    Use a Dell at work. Clones are for Homes.

    And piracy sucks, just stop buying the crap, and when they start seeing the sales nosedive they'll lower prices so it's just more practical to purchase the real deal.

    Cheers.

    --
    End of Line.
    1. Re:Don't doubt it for a minute by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I used clones at home, but my last two Asus boards had dealbreaking issues with them and I got sick of always having a PC that was one off from working properly. Now my XPS makes about 1/3 the noise of my old case and is way easier to get into and work in. Inside the box, I've encountered zero issues with it so far, which after the last several years of Asus-based systems is a little surreal. I can even run two nVidias in SLI or two ATIs in Crossfire as I please...

      That said, I may have to find a free fix for this at work now, and if Dell ever tried this with me I'd make them rue the day they ever tried... It's possible to enjoy convenience and NOT take BS.

    2. Re:Don't doubt it for a minute by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      I build about five systems a month...So your mileage may vary....
      I took Asus as an example, But currently have A-Bit, Gig-Byte, MSI and a few others
      in Clones PC's and 2 Clone servers....and some old Digital Alpha in the back coupled with a Celebris.

      I wasn't commenting on Asus's reliability or "lemon" factor.....

      I was commenting on the chances of longer life, better performance and less heartache on a Clone versus a Name Brand.

      As far as having a quiet box well, stick to bigger Antec cases and the like instead of the cheap Generics...

      Cheers.

      --
      End of Line.
    3. Re:Don't doubt it for a minute by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I set up 0-5, sometimes 30-50 in a month at work, but they're all Dell now and limited to a few models. I'm no stranger to going from scratch, but it's been a few years now.

      These weren't lemons. I was able to check with two other friends who by some strange coincidence, seem to end up with the same mobos/3D cards as I do. The A7N266-C had abysmal chipset drivers the whole time I owned it, and I had to manually assign every IRQ lest they all heap onto one or two and fail. The A7V8X-X has good specs and performance for its time, but would emit a high pitched whistle whenever a USB 2.0 device was plugged in. USB 2 flashdrives would corrupt when being written to. This not only happened to two friends, but one has made a lot of PCs for clients with the A7V8X-X and every one has the USB issue. It could be bad caps, but they ALL seem to have them, bought from different sources over a few years. My A7V8X-X system also had a noisy power supply, so I got an Antec Truepower 550. It was nice and quiet, and the Molex connectors were second to none, but the voltages it supplied were inaccurate from 5-15%!! With either it or the old PSU I would power it on cold and the fans would fire up, but no video, no POST beeps. Then I'd hit reset and it would boot properly. It's not the current at my house, which works with dozens of other PCs I've brought through, is a full 120v, 60Hz, grounded, no brownouts. It also didn't have any lighting or useless mods, though it did have 5 80mm fans - they should be nothing to a PSU like that. On this system, Windows also liked to switch my hard disks back to PIO mode when I wasn't looking, even though I'd applied patches to fix that problem. The disks read well in diagnostics, but I suppose it kept having read errors to cause it to step down like that. It made video editing.... challenging.

      For longer life, I can't comment since the only PC I've ever had cease functioning was a Cyrix 333MHz box. For better performance, that's vague and hard to measure all homemade clones vs all name brand clones, but I certainly have no issues with an XPS710 other than not being able to throw enough at it to max out the CPU. Less heartache? I upgraded my last two clones because they technically worked, but were plagued with so many miserable technical issues and workarounds I couldn't stand them anymore. Really the main reason I went to a name brand is because it was nothing BUT heartache trying to get a custom system to function normally and it's been smooth sailing ever since.

      Also, my last case was a Lian Li, which was very well reviewed way back when I got it.

  60. Accurate weights... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they removed an advertised capability without notice, that's deceitful and arguably fraudulent, though probably not illegal. :)

  61. Dell E310 with SigmaTel Audio by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    Said options were disabled on my computer too. When I finally required its use, I got around to fixing it by going to SigmaTel's web site and acquiring updated drivers. The 'Stereo Mix' option then appeared and worked without issues.

    1. Re:Dell E310 with SigmaTel Audio by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      URL to drivers? I went to their site and all they have is a note saying that they do not DIRECTLY provide drivers for their products.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:Dell E310 with SigmaTel Audio by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can't seem to find them again. It's been at least a couple of years since I downloaded them. Google seems to be providing some decent search results, however.

  62. uhh by redefinescience · · Score: 1

    s/pdif out to s/pdif in? :P

  63. Grumpy bullshit by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, here is ALL of the evidence that the RIAA has been strongarming Dell into this behaviour:

    (from http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/32286847/vista-audio-solution--wh.aspx)

    "Many of you may have been as frustrated as myself by Micrsoft bowing to the RIAA
    and pressuring the soundcard manufacturers to remove the "What You Hear" feature
    from their drivers."

    Oh, yeah, and there's the other article which points to it, on http://www.ripten.com/2008/07/07/bend-over-dude-youre-getting-a-dell/:

    "Some believe that Dell, and several other computer manufacturers such as Gateway and Pac Bell, were pressured by the RIAA (Record Industry Association of America) into disabling the stereo mix functionality." ...

    "So that we are all clear, the evidence points to Dell appeasing the RIAA by disabling hardware, only to have their customer service reps turn around and offer a solution to their consumers that reverses the alteration they made in the first place at a premium price."

    Yep, that's it. One guy claimed it with absolutely no evidence, and so it's apparently true. Another guy wilfully misinterpreted some random tech support guy's suggestion, and now we have a collusion between Dell and the RIAA. Wow, this is investigative reporting at its finest!

    My Dell laptop at work didn't have a way of turning off the damned 'tap to click' feature of the touchpad. I spent ages looking for a downloadable driver to make that feature work. Based on the rules of logic illustrated above, this is clearly a sign of collusion between Dell and Logitech.

    Honestly, aren't there enough examples of corporate bullshit that we don't have to invent false ones?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Grumpy bullshit by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      How was it again? "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  64. They are damn lucky they didn't do it to my laptop by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they had, I would have sued dell in a heartbeat.

    This is an expected feature of modern sound cards and not to be fucked with.

    This is getting out of hand and Dell and the whole board who decided this are COWARDS!

    I guess no one has the integrity to stand up and say, enough is enough.

    The RIAA is overstepping their bounds by miles here.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  65. Color Me Confused by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    What is a "stereo mix option"?

    Just guessing that it is mixer loopback. But, not being a Windows (tm) user, I don't know. I would have assumed that a "stereo/mono mix option" would be a 5.1/7.1 down-mix.

    Please clarify (no, I am not going to turn in my "geek" designation -- I am just a Solaris/Linux user).

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  66. This sucks by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

    I routinely use Stereo Mix to save my voicemail to mp3 files. This is completely legitimate use that I find extremely important and the alternative is to dish out hundreds of dollars to shady "phone recorder" sellers.

    RIAA can stuff it. I don't pirate music because frankly I don't like listening to it. Why should I have to pay a levy on CD sales (in Canada) and lose Stereo Mix when I rarely listen to music?

    1. Re:This sucks by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      relax, this article is just FUD with no sources, the truth is more likely certain models of Dell are sold with stinky driver

  67. Sound and fury, signifying nothing by xandraius · · Score: 1

    No RIAA collusion is evident. Sounds like a lot of BS being spewed because a driver has crappy setup parameters which can be fixed. The integrated audio chipset is used industry wide, which is why you see the issue on so many platforms. It's poor design, not conspiracy

  68. Add Sony Vaio to the list by booshnoogs · · Score: 1

    Not shockingly, my 6 month old Vaio laptop is also incapable using Stereo Mix, which sucks because I bought it specifically to edit old home videos and archive them to DVD.

  69. If it's far superior, by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    It'll just screen capture the screen like most DVD apps out there.

    I haven't had a DVD screen capture issue since like, 1999. What's all the fuss about?

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  70. Re:Windows XP? Didn't he say "OS X"? by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

    Someone above posted that you can use the screenshot widget.

    I believe the XP sidetrack started out as a "See, Windoze does it too!!1121" comment; which then evolved into a discussion of why and how-to.

  71. Gold-plated connectors by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    That just means you didn't use the gold-plated Monster cables. Silly audiophile. Copper is for kids! You probably also don't have a proper Ethernet patchcord for your PC. here, let me help you out. Kids these days. I swear...

  72. $1.50? by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you get the same functionality with a $1.50 cable connecting the output to the input.

  73. photoshop banknotes by vaporland · · Score: 1

    you CAN scan and print banknotes from Photoshop 7!

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  74. The RIAA is systematically destroying music by FazzMunkle · · Score: 1

    On purpose.

    Anybody get this feeling from time to time? That the RIAA really isn't in the business of selling music, but is a front for some anti-music cult who's apocalyptic agenda is the demise of anything melodic?

    No?

    Thought I was on to something there...