In a one-dimensional existence, if you were a line, what would a square look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another line, right?
In a two-dimensional existence, if you were a square, what would a cube look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another square, right?
In a three-dimensional existence, if you were a cube, what would a tesseract look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another cube...
Time is the common element here. It defines the passage of an object through its plane of existence. A fourth-dimensional object contains all the aspects of its three-dimensional representations over time. If you try to define that fourth-dimensional object at a specific frame in time in three-dimensional existence, it becomes a three dimensional representation of the fourth dimensional object.
Now, what if what we refer to as "God' has an unmitigated perspective on our fourth-dimensional objects? God is able to observe all our aspects and the choices we make throughout our three-dimensional existence. This isn't as much predestination as it is omniscience. We still have free will to make the choice, but God knows the choice we make.
It does make me curious, though. What does a fourth-dimensional human actually looks like?
And can you run ECC memory on that Q6600? I know not everyone has to do this, but when you are talking about workstation-level tolerance, ECC memory becomes important, and to find that in the Intel world, you have to step up to Xeon processors and mainboards, which are much pricier.
On the other hand, with standard off-the-shelf Athlon II, Phenom II and BD processors, I can use ECC memory (depending on the mainboard, of course) and get workstation-level memory tolerance.
Again, I give you the caveat that not everyone has this requirement, but it sure is nice for those of us who want workstations without having to buy server parts.
In France the government fears, or at least respects, the people.
Considering what happened during the French Revolution, the current Powers-That-Be has good reason to fear the French people. They stormed the Bastille once, and celebrate it every year just to remind the government that they aren't afraid to do it again.
That, and the French people weren't afraid to invent and use the guillotine.
1) Sandy Bridge is on its second generation. It inherits from the long line of progression from the Core legacy and has done very well considering the amount of money that Intel has pumped into developing these processors. To say that these chips are very mature would be an understatement.
2) AMD has invested a fraction of the R&D expense that Intel has sunk into developing SB/Core architecture when comparing it to BD development. On top of that, BD is in its infancy and is exploring new paths to try and gain efficiencies. I think BD developers need to be proud of their accomplishment, even if it doesn't quite match up clock-for-clock against SB. As the design for these processors matures, and AMD releases a few more Steppings, we will probably see improvements in power usage and performance.
3) As this was a new model, none of the OS kernels out today use these processors in the most optimal way. As the architecture matures, I'm sure that the OS developers will redevelop thread initiation and assignment to make better use of BD's assets. This in itself will net better performance even without improvements in the overall design.
You might think I am just rooting for the underdog, but as a consumer, so should you. Without AMD to keep Intel on it's toes in the X86 market, we will eventually see new chips from Intel that are nothing more than speedbumps, but at prices that will make it difficult for anyone to afford. Intel still prices competitively where AMD still has alternative product, but look at where AMD has not kit to compete. Intel will price there accordingly, because they can. No competition means that the price will float as high as demand.
I try to alternate my personal machines. One year, I will buy AMD, while the next, I will buy Intel. For one machine, I may buy NVidia graphic cards, while another will use AMD. The home media server in the closet is due for an upgrade. I went with an Intel Xeon build three years ago. This time, I will build it with BD Opterons. Do you think anyone besides me will notice the difference, unless I told them? Probably not.
If....if...if...you have access to the source code, have software vendors working (or willing to work) on a recompile, or an in-house development team who is familiar with ARM architecture, to include best practices to get the highest performance. This is the Achilles' heel, really. You toss a stone and you will hit a halfway-competent developer who understands X86...not so easy with any of the RISC architectures, and to find efficient coders working with ARM processors, you are going to have to go shopping in the mobile development market. Most businesses are conservative anyway, and won't take the extra effort or spend the extra money to switch operating platforms, especially if the ARM architecture only offers lukewarm benefits compared to staying with tried-and-true X86.
I remember a story from my childhood. One of the local grocery stores was going through the pains of unionization of the workers. The management was fighting hard to keep the staff from forming or joining a union. All it took was a chance conversation between one of the guys unloading trucks at the docks with one of the truck drivers (who all happened to be Teamsters), and all the sudden, truckers stopped taking deliveries to this particular chain of stores. Independent truckers were willing to do it, but only for 2-3 times the previous rate. In the end, the management went ahead with the unionization and things have been quiet since.
How is it that countries like Sweden, Norway, Germany and Finland are consistently at the top of average pay per worker, yet you have companies clamoring to expand their workforce in these countries? All four of these countries reinvest heavily into their population, in the form of free higher education, universal health coverage and collective bargaining protection.
Germany has always been an economic powerhouse, yet at the same time, has also always been one of the most socialist countries in the world (one could argue that it was the birthplace of the modern socialist movement). Even their professional workers (lawyers, engineers, architects, IT workers, programmers, etc.) have their own trade organizations that enforces individual rights and standards. What in their society has allowed their corporations to work closely with unions and still maintain a responsive and reliable workforce? I thought union created lazy workers, and the only way you can keep workers efficient is to constantly threaten their livelihood?
I have friends who work over there, and they are horrified at some of the corporate hi-jinks I have relayed to them that are SOP here in the US, such as mandatory overtime, canceled vacations, use-it-or-lose-it vacation and sick time, let alone average workweek schedules. My friend Rolf, for instance, had to get special dispensation from his local trade representative in order to work through a regular-scheduled holiday so his company could meet a contract requirement for getting a product to market, and even then, the trade representative not only required that Rolf get paid double his usual rate, but that he was also to take time off to make up for the missed holiday after the work was completed. And his company had to abide by that decision. Yet still his company remains one of the most profitable in their industry, even with all the additional union restrictions on worker time and pay.
What a lot of folks here aren't taking into account is the fact that the whole collegiate education system will be turned entirely on its ear in the next few decades. In fact, we are seeing the nascent stages of this already happening with the wider dissemination of knowledge via the internet. For instance, if I want to learn how to start programming, I can pool enough information from a variety of Google searches to cover about 3 semesters worth of programming courses. For a nominal fee (nowhere near what I would pay for a single course over a semester, let alone for a single lecture) I can take that acquired knowledge and turn it into a certification that translates into a real wage increase, or at least a chance at opening a door.
To be honest, I have picked up more knowledge since leaving college than I acquired in college. Did college give me a framework to learn this new knowledge? Not really. For instance, I spent the majority of my college career planning to be a graphic artist, but using techniques before the advent of computers. I used computers all through college, but they were for writing term papers or to look up course materials and email, and, of course, a few games from time to time, but never really for graphic design.
But my entire industry was turned on its ear by the advent of computers, so much so that by the time I graduated, I had discovered that no one out there was hiring folks with traditional training, but they were paying top dollar for experienced artists who could work in Photoshop and Illustrator. So, over the course of two weeks, I went through a crash course to learn both programs, and landed my first job out of college working for an advertising agency. I kept that job for about 2 months until my paycheck bounced (a reality-check for me, since nowhere in my college career did they cover this part of the work) and then I moved on to bigger and better pastures.
Ever since then, there has been that temptation to go back to school. But each time, when I have been faced with new crossroads in my career, instead of going back to school, I have instead knuckled down, picked up the right material to learn and then picked up the certification as a matter of due course. I taught myself through most of my programming and development experience this way, picking up C++, HTML, Perl, Java, SQL and several other languages. I even went so far as to tie in my graphic design background and now spend a large amount of my time doing UI design.
To be honest, the last time I spent time in a classroom was over 20 years ago, and the last student loan I paid off was about 15 years ago. But I feel that I am constantly learning and refining the knowledge I already possess. I guess this is the true definition of "professional." My next "re-invention" will be to move into game programming and design. I fully expect that I will do well considering my design experience, programming experience, as well as my background in UI design. Is this going to be a paying gig? Probably not, since I make more than enough money at my day job. Is it going to be fun? You bet it is!
Icons on a grid? Lisa, circa 1983. Macintosh, circa 1983-84.
On-screen keyboard? Desk Accessory circa 1985 on Macintosh OS, which allowed you to use an on-screen keyboard controlled by the mouse.
Multipoint touch gestures? FingerWorks (a company acquired by Apple) was the pioneer in multipoint "gesture" recognition, going back circa 1998. Both of the founders of FingerWorks continue to work for Apple (AFAIK), developing technologies that are used in the iPhone and MacBook trackpads today.
Apple even developed an entire OS centered around a tablet computer (the Newton), which predated Palm by about 10 years.
Apple may have stood on the shoulders of some giants, but they got where they are by all means legitimate.
Part of the reason why Doctors in other industrialized nations do well is because the state picks up the bill on their education and provides legal protections against rampant malpractice lawsuits without merit, thus lessening the need for costly malpractice insurance. In most industrialized countries, even a legitimate malpractice lawsuit tends to have lower payouts due to the fact that the patient still receives the benefit of health coverage and cannot be denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition.
Take these factors into account, and a doctor in Switzerland, or Germany, for instance, can make anywhere from 50-60% less gross than a doctor here in the US, and still end up with more net income in the end when you take out the payments made to student loans, malpractice insurance and any number of board and licensing fees. Also consider that most practices cover the malpractice insurance of the rest of their medical staff (i.e., nurses, equipment techs, etc.).
The other side of the coin is that practices in other countries usually have a shorter list of insurance carriers to deal with, and most, if not all of them, are required to pay in a very timely manner, whereas in the US, every insurance company has their own way of handling insurance payouts, and failure to follow their exacting methods will result in payment denial. Even if you follow their procedure, most insurance companies take 60-90 days to pay out to providers. And this is common in the industry.
Cooking does somewhat reduce the "natural" nutrtive content of some food, but it also makes almost every other food more digestible. In some ways, cooking has allowed us to reduce the amount of gut we have to carry with us to digest food more fully. An cooked egg, for instance, delivers more readily digestible proteins than a raw egg. Cooking also reduces the chance of becoming infected with a food-born pathogen.
There are many proponents of a "natural" raw diet who deplore the "unhealthy" addition of cooking, but the human body has adapted to cooked food over many generations now. Our digestive tracts tend to be much simpler than, say, cattle or goats, who have to break down a nutrition-poor diet in order to extract the greatest amount of energy. This is why cattle and goats spend most of their day browsing, and why we don't spend most of our day doing the same.
Raw food has its place with certain foods, where appropriate. At the same time, I will still continue to cook food where appropriate too, since I personally don't like becoming a host to listeria, e. coli and who knows whatever food-born pathogen exists out there.
As for pro-biotics...most ruminant species spend the first few months of their lives going around and eating their mother's dung. This is the most effective way the child has of capturing some of the bacterial culture that already exists in the parent's gut. Last I checked, this wasn't a human behavior, though I am sure there are other means of passing biotic cultures from one gut to the next (without the involvement of fecal material, I would hope).
You know, I look at traffic enforcement as a teat for municipalities to suck on the income of the average citizen that really doesn't have a point. If traffic enforcement was really about public safety, then they should ticket everyone who violates traffic laws. I'm not just talking speeding here, either. Point in case (used it right there, btw), red light cameras actually reduce fatal accidents where they are installed (I can cite several articles, but I leave it to intelligent folks here to use their google bar for once). I say install cameras at major intersections on on major roadways known to have issues with traffic that is unable to adhere to the advertised speed.
In fact, Germany is a point in case also. The only time you see Polizei pull someone over on the side of the road is if they were in gross violation. They leave the small stuff to the cameras, who bring in more automated revenue in an hour than any single officer could do in an entire day of traffic patrol. This leaves more officers (witha bigger budget, I may add) able to do...I don't know...real police work, rather than babysitting the driving public.
So I say, as an average taxpaying citizen, bring on the cameras! People are mostly dumb, but after they start getting $50 ticket after ticket, with two pictures of them driving their cars in clear view, and clear evidence of the violation (excessive speed, failure to observe signal changes at an intersection, etc.), maybe they will start to change their ways and start driving a little safer. And those folks who get excessive tickets? Next time they go down to the DMV to renew their license, or go in to renew their tags, someone might bring up the fact that they do see an excessive number of violation enforcements, and maybe reccommend a few driving courses...
BTW, I commute in a carpool over 140 km each way every day up and down IH-35 in Texas. I have seen every kind of driver under the sun. Hence the reason I say that the average driver is pretty dumb. They almost always drive in excess of the posted speed limit, and are usually distracted by the phone conversation they are having, or drinking/eating, I have seen people try to work on their laptop while driving, let alone a smart phone. And I have seen accidents that will set your hair on end. Makes me all the more aware that I drive with both hands on the wheel and both eyes in constant motion, aware of everything aroud me, especially that poor distracted idiot three lanes over who is drifting into my lane (without a turn signal, of course) and wants to try and prove that two objects can exist in the same place at the same time. Yep, if we had cameras on these folks, we would either have to reduce taxes because of so much income, or they will either be forced off the road or start reforming their behavior. Either way, it's all good from my perspective.
Of course Republicrats don't give a damn about the environment...or, rather, they are only concerned about it if it means profits for their cronies (and themselves) in the end. For instance, if they can charge more for an incidental change that doesn't increase their costs, but it is beneficial for the environment, then all is good with the world. If they have to pay more, then they will only do it if they are forced into it by laws, and then, only if they can't get a variance in the law in their favor. I've seen this happen time and time again with zoning requirements, impermeable ground cover and runoff/retention requirements.
As for the tiered scheme...this only applies to residential customers. Businesses get a huge break on rates per gallon as their usage increases. Residential customers usually end up subsidizing businesses. Consider that a catfish farm just outside of San Antonio uses as much water as the entire city of San Antonio...and I bet the owners don't pay nearly as much as all the residential customers of San Antonio combined.
Nuclear power has had the same problems for years. In order to operate, the plant has to generate a base capacity. When the grid requirement would drop below this base capacity, the plant would then have to push this power somewhere else. For a lot of plants that had different reservoirs at differing elevations, they would use the excess power to pump water from the lower reservoir into the higher one. Then, when the grid needed more power, they would run the water the other way and capture the "stored" energy using turbines.
You don't even have to electrolyze water for H2 and O2, nor do you have to pump water. Something as simple as compressed air can store energy in the short term, which could then be recaptured later. Yes, batteries can be used in this capacity as well, but then you have all the issues you have to deal with when you maintain battery cells. Compressed air is simple...a tank stores the air, and a turbine captures the kinetic energy from that stored air once it is released from the tank.
This stuff soooo reminds me of the pseudo-science crap that a lot of cults use to justify their beliefs. If you buy into this pile of manure then you deserve to lose every single penny in your pockets.
It seems all they have to do is put some letters after their name and fill the article with indecipherable jargon and lovely TLAs (that's three-letter-acronyms, folks) to make it sound like they know what they are talking about. Add to it, they then talk about something that even experts have problems fully understanding (like quantum mechanics, string theory, etc.) and increase their credibility factor with the unwashed civilians.
And if anyone calls them on the BS they are shoveling, they discredit the non-believer by calling their expertise into question ("Hey, he doesn't have any letters after his name" or "he doesn't use the correct jargon" or "he doesn't know the meaning of the TLAs we use"). A true subject matter expert is usually the first guy to authoritatively admit he doesn't know everything in his field of expertise and still has a lot to learn. These are the humble folks who willingly share what they have learned in the hope that the person they are sharing with will bring new insight to the field.
Who said anything about rebooting? You can do this with another log-in, and just switch users when you want to browse *questionable* sites. Or how about running this in a VM? It has hardware access, but no links to your main file system, though it will appear on your desktop just like any other browser window. I could easily see Apple implementing this using current open source solutions. So you could launch Safari, and then Really Safe Safari.
I will have to agree on this point. Also, you don't want to develop in an environment and/or language that no one else in your organization is familiar with unless you plan on supporting that code ad infinitum. For instance, if I know someone else if going to be following up after I am done, I tend to be a lot more verbose with my comments in the source. I also avoid using a large number of "shortcuts" that I know other developers are not familiar with.
The ubiquity of Windows is sometimes a good thing. Hiring a decent C++ or Java developer is very difficult, especially one who is willing to come in and work with your undocumented legacy code. You throw a stone and you will probably hit a halfway decent.NET developer in the head.
You know...if any of the students were caught nude, or even en flagrante...this could very well turn into criminal prosecution since any such pictures, taken of underage minors, is, in fact, child pornography. Let's lock up the sick bastards who would take snapshots of kids in various states of undress...and most expecially if they are caught in any sex acts with other minors...
1) Dell: I know several business owners who have been so burned by Dell in the past that it would take a miracle for them to go back. Sure, they have made good machines in the past, but I think we can all remember the whole GX270 bursting capacitors issue? One such business owner was stuck with 2 pallets of computers he had to eventually write off because Dell refused to support them any further.
2) Hewlett-Packard: Nearly the same boat as Dell. Sure, their corporate support is pretty good, but with most of the companies I have dealt with over the years (150-200 employees), these folks barely show up as a blip on their radars. So when one customer gets one bad server after another, and has to go through phone support from someone with a very heavy Mumbai accent each time, they begin to feel like the integrator really just doesn't care.
3) Local PC Shop: Yeah, don't go there. Sometimes, they are perfect for the job. More often than not, you end up with a guy who slaps one piece of hardware together with another, loads the OS and drivers and looks the other way when everything goes belly up because the configuration isn't a tested, proven environment. Not something I would trust for running mission-critical applications like your SQL server, etc.
The one company that actually followed my recommendation and went with Apple desktops backed up by FreeBSD servers absolutely loves the setup. Their network admin, who used to manage AIX servers years before, loved FreeBSD and was right at home getting everything set up, and even though he was new to OS X, he found them very easy to configure, especially since all he had to do to feel comfortable making changes to each system was to launch the terminal (or remote from his own desktop) and use the more familiar bash commands to diagnose problems and/or set up new configurations. To add to the mix, all the desktop hardware and software support was backed up by Apple. Granted, the servers were still supported by a local shop, but once you get past the hardware and driver issues, FreeBSD is rock-solid.
Apple doesn't need to dominate the server room to make an impact on business. There are other, much more suitable Posix operating systems that do that job much better. Nope, their strength is entirely based on interoperability with those servers as well as ease-of-use for both admins and the end users. Add to that a plethora of applications that are designed to make businesses work.
Not as much as you would think. RISC (and ARM) is not anathema to Intel design strategy, and if Apple gives them some play in the game (though Apple has the talent on staff to do their own design), then the applications of ARM-based, Apple-designed chips might be in Intel's favor for the future, especially if they see major operating systems (such as, Windows) traditionally developed only for the x86 market starting the gain purchase in the ARM arena.
I guess what I am trying to say is that while Intel would be happiest if the solution to their future relationship with Apple came from in-house, they would not look the other way if their gift horse came riding to them with Steve Jobs on it's back. It keeps Apple coming to them as a one-stop shop (and that's not insignificant, especially looking at future iPhone and iPad numbers) as well as giving them an edge on seeing the inside development of latest-gen ARM-based processors without having to ante up for the license, since Apple would be footing that bill.
Ahhhh...someone who ascribes to the theory that anyone can program. Yes, this is true, just like anyone can cook, as long as they know how to follow a recipe.
But here is the rub...anyone can cook, just not everyone is able to eat it. You still have to find people who can come up with new and original recipes if you are looking for something different. And this is something not everyone can do.
Or should I use the painting analogy? Anyone can paint. My three-year-old self was more than able to splat finger paints on a piece of paper that might be reasonably construed as a house, but aside from my mother, no one would call it artwork comparable to any of the great masters, let alone an undergraduate student in his third year of art school. And others do things like trace someone else's art and call it theirs, or use a stencil or decoupage instead of creating their own original art. I've seen this too, both in art and in programming.
And while you may be able to distill one portion or another of this talent and bottle it up into a curriculum that you can teach, a lot of the ability to see a problem and conceive a powerful and efficient solution (or any solution at all) that doesn't exist in a formula is not a skill that can be taught, but raw talent that must be trained. You will find that great programmers approach solutions to problems much the same way a mathematician is able to solve problems in complex systems.
Not every problem in the world has been solved. And people will continue to conceive new problems looking for solutions every day. Identifying the problem is only the beginning...coming up with a solution is where the real genius lies. And if you go out there looking for the lowest bidder, more often than not, you will get what you pay for. Trust me, I have fixed more than my share of code coming out of India or China.
Slashdot Mirror
Ask yourself this:
In a one-dimensional existence, if you were a line, what would a square look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another line, right?
In a two-dimensional existence, if you were a square, what would a cube look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another square, right?
In a three-dimensional existence, if you were a cube, what would a tesseract look like to you as it passed through your existence over time? Another cube...
Time is the common element here. It defines the passage of an object through its plane of existence. A fourth-dimensional object contains all the aspects of its three-dimensional representations over time. If you try to define that fourth-dimensional object at a specific frame in time in three-dimensional existence, it becomes a three dimensional representation of the fourth dimensional object.
Now, what if what we refer to as "God' has an unmitigated perspective on our fourth-dimensional objects? God is able to observe all our aspects and the choices we make throughout our three-dimensional existence. This isn't as much predestination as it is omniscience. We still have free will to make the choice, but God knows the choice we make.
It does make me curious, though. What does a fourth-dimensional human actually looks like?
And can you run ECC memory on that Q6600? I know not everyone has to do this, but when you are talking about workstation-level tolerance, ECC memory becomes important, and to find that in the Intel world, you have to step up to Xeon processors and mainboards, which are much pricier.
On the other hand, with standard off-the-shelf Athlon II, Phenom II and BD processors, I can use ECC memory (depending on the mainboard, of course) and get workstation-level memory tolerance.
Again, I give you the caveat that not everyone has this requirement, but it sure is nice for those of us who want workstations without having to buy server parts.
They say the first thing to go is your memory and the second...well, dammit, I keep forgetting the second...
In France the government fears, or at least respects, the people.
Considering what happened during the French Revolution, the current Powers-That-Be has good reason to fear the French people. They stormed the Bastille once, and celebrate it every year just to remind the government that they aren't afraid to do it again.
That, and the French people weren't afraid to invent and use the guillotine.
1) Sandy Bridge is on its second generation. It inherits from the long line of progression from the Core legacy and has done very well considering the amount of money that Intel has pumped into developing these processors. To say that these chips are very mature would be an understatement.
2) AMD has invested a fraction of the R&D expense that Intel has sunk into developing SB/Core architecture when comparing it to BD development. On top of that, BD is in its infancy and is exploring new paths to try and gain efficiencies. I think BD developers need to be proud of their accomplishment, even if it doesn't quite match up clock-for-clock against SB. As the design for these processors matures, and AMD releases a few more Steppings, we will probably see improvements in power usage and performance.
3) As this was a new model, none of the OS kernels out today use these processors in the most optimal way. As the architecture matures, I'm sure that the OS developers will redevelop thread initiation and assignment to make better use of BD's assets. This in itself will net better performance even without improvements in the overall design.
You might think I am just rooting for the underdog, but as a consumer, so should you. Without AMD to keep Intel on it's toes in the X86 market, we will eventually see new chips from Intel that are nothing more than speedbumps, but at prices that will make it difficult for anyone to afford. Intel still prices competitively where AMD still has alternative product, but look at where AMD has not kit to compete. Intel will price there accordingly, because they can. No competition means that the price will float as high as demand.
I try to alternate my personal machines. One year, I will buy AMD, while the next, I will buy Intel. For one machine, I may buy NVidia graphic cards, while another will use AMD. The home media server in the closet is due for an upgrade. I went with an Intel Xeon build three years ago. This time, I will build it with BD Opterons. Do you think anyone besides me will notice the difference, unless I told them? Probably not.
If....if...if...you have access to the source code, have software vendors working (or willing to work) on a recompile, or an in-house development team who is familiar with ARM architecture, to include best practices to get the highest performance. This is the Achilles' heel, really. You toss a stone and you will hit a halfway-competent developer who understands X86...not so easy with any of the RISC architectures, and to find efficient coders working with ARM processors, you are going to have to go shopping in the mobile development market. Most businesses are conservative anyway, and won't take the extra effort or spend the extra money to switch operating platforms, especially if the ARM architecture only offers lukewarm benefits compared to staying with tried-and-true X86.
I remember a story from my childhood. One of the local grocery stores was going through the pains of unionization of the workers. The management was fighting hard to keep the staff from forming or joining a union. All it took was a chance conversation between one of the guys unloading trucks at the docks with one of the truck drivers (who all happened to be Teamsters), and all the sudden, truckers stopped taking deliveries to this particular chain of stores. Independent truckers were willing to do it, but only for 2-3 times the previous rate. In the end, the management went ahead with the unionization and things have been quiet since.
How is it that countries like Sweden, Norway, Germany and Finland are consistently at the top of average pay per worker, yet you have companies clamoring to expand their workforce in these countries? All four of these countries reinvest heavily into their population, in the form of free higher education, universal health coverage and collective bargaining protection.
Germany has always been an economic powerhouse, yet at the same time, has also always been one of the most socialist countries in the world (one could argue that it was the birthplace of the modern socialist movement). Even their professional workers (lawyers, engineers, architects, IT workers, programmers, etc.) have their own trade organizations that enforces individual rights and standards. What in their society has allowed their corporations to work closely with unions and still maintain a responsive and reliable workforce? I thought union created lazy workers, and the only way you can keep workers efficient is to constantly threaten their livelihood?
I have friends who work over there, and they are horrified at some of the corporate hi-jinks I have relayed to them that are SOP here in the US, such as mandatory overtime, canceled vacations, use-it-or-lose-it vacation and sick time, let alone average workweek schedules. My friend Rolf, for instance, had to get special dispensation from his local trade representative in order to work through a regular-scheduled holiday so his company could meet a contract requirement for getting a product to market, and even then, the trade representative not only required that Rolf get paid double his usual rate, but that he was also to take time off to make up for the missed holiday after the work was completed. And his company had to abide by that decision. Yet still his company remains one of the most profitable in their industry, even with all the additional union restrictions on worker time and pay.
What a lot of folks here aren't taking into account is the fact that the whole collegiate education system will be turned entirely on its ear in the next few decades. In fact, we are seeing the nascent stages of this already happening with the wider dissemination of knowledge via the internet. For instance, if I want to learn how to start programming, I can pool enough information from a variety of Google searches to cover about 3 semesters worth of programming courses. For a nominal fee (nowhere near what I would pay for a single course over a semester, let alone for a single lecture) I can take that acquired knowledge and turn it into a certification that translates into a real wage increase, or at least a chance at opening a door.
To be honest, I have picked up more knowledge since leaving college than I acquired in college. Did college give me a framework to learn this new knowledge? Not really. For instance, I spent the majority of my college career planning to be a graphic artist, but using techniques before the advent of computers. I used computers all through college, but they were for writing term papers or to look up course materials and email, and, of course, a few games from time to time, but never really for graphic design.
But my entire industry was turned on its ear by the advent of computers, so much so that by the time I graduated, I had discovered that no one out there was hiring folks with traditional training, but they were paying top dollar for experienced artists who could work in Photoshop and Illustrator. So, over the course of two weeks, I went through a crash course to learn both programs, and landed my first job out of college working for an advertising agency. I kept that job for about 2 months until my paycheck bounced (a reality-check for me, since nowhere in my college career did they cover this part of the work) and then I moved on to bigger and better pastures.
Ever since then, there has been that temptation to go back to school. But each time, when I have been faced with new crossroads in my career, instead of going back to school, I have instead knuckled down, picked up the right material to learn and then picked up the certification as a matter of due course. I taught myself through most of my programming and development experience this way, picking up C++, HTML, Perl, Java, SQL and several other languages. I even went so far as to tie in my graphic design background and now spend a large amount of my time doing UI design.
To be honest, the last time I spent time in a classroom was over 20 years ago, and the last student loan I paid off was about 15 years ago. But I feel that I am constantly learning and refining the knowledge I already possess. I guess this is the true definition of "professional." My next "re-invention" will be to move into game programming and design. I fully expect that I will do well considering my design experience, programming experience, as well as my background in UI design. Is this going to be a paying gig? Probably not, since I make more than enough money at my day job. Is it going to be fun? You bet it is!
Icons on a grid? Lisa, circa 1983. Macintosh, circa 1983-84.
On-screen keyboard? Desk Accessory circa 1985 on Macintosh OS, which allowed you to use an on-screen keyboard controlled by the mouse.
Multipoint touch gestures? FingerWorks (a company acquired by Apple) was the pioneer in multipoint "gesture" recognition, going back circa 1998. Both of the founders of FingerWorks continue to work for Apple (AFAIK), developing technologies that are used in the iPhone and MacBook trackpads today.
Apple even developed an entire OS centered around a tablet computer (the Newton), which predated Palm by about 10 years.
Apple may have stood on the shoulders of some giants, but they got where they are by all means legitimate.
Part of the reason why Doctors in other industrialized nations do well is because the state picks up the bill on their education and provides legal protections against rampant malpractice lawsuits without merit, thus lessening the need for costly malpractice insurance. In most industrialized countries, even a legitimate malpractice lawsuit tends to have lower payouts due to the fact that the patient still receives the benefit of health coverage and cannot be denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition.
Take these factors into account, and a doctor in Switzerland, or Germany, for instance, can make anywhere from 50-60% less gross than a doctor here in the US, and still end up with more net income in the end when you take out the payments made to student loans, malpractice insurance and any number of board and licensing fees. Also consider that most practices cover the malpractice insurance of the rest of their medical staff (i.e., nurses, equipment techs, etc.).
The other side of the coin is that practices in other countries usually have a shorter list of insurance carriers to deal with, and most, if not all of them, are required to pay in a very timely manner, whereas in the US, every insurance company has their own way of handling insurance payouts, and failure to follow their exacting methods will result in payment denial. Even if you follow their procedure, most insurance companies take 60-90 days to pay out to providers. And this is common in the industry.
Cooking does somewhat reduce the "natural" nutrtive content of some food, but it also makes almost every other food more digestible. In some ways, cooking has allowed us to reduce the amount of gut we have to carry with us to digest food more fully. An cooked egg, for instance, delivers more readily digestible proteins than a raw egg. Cooking also reduces the chance of becoming infected with a food-born pathogen.
There are many proponents of a "natural" raw diet who deplore the "unhealthy" addition of cooking, but the human body has adapted to cooked food over many generations now. Our digestive tracts tend to be much simpler than, say, cattle or goats, who have to break down a nutrition-poor diet in order to extract the greatest amount of energy. This is why cattle and goats spend most of their day browsing, and why we don't spend most of our day doing the same.
Raw food has its place with certain foods, where appropriate. At the same time, I will still continue to cook food where appropriate too, since I personally don't like becoming a host to listeria, e. coli and who knows whatever food-born pathogen exists out there.
As for pro-biotics...most ruminant species spend the first few months of their lives going around and eating their mother's dung. This is the most effective way the child has of capturing some of the bacterial culture that already exists in the parent's gut. Last I checked, this wasn't a human behavior, though I am sure there are other means of passing biotic cultures from one gut to the next (without the involvement of fecal material, I would hope).
You know, I look at traffic enforcement as a teat for municipalities to suck on the income of the average citizen that really doesn't have a point. If traffic enforcement was really about public safety, then they should ticket everyone who violates traffic laws. I'm not just talking speeding here, either. Point in case (used it right there, btw), red light cameras actually reduce fatal accidents where they are installed (I can cite several articles, but I leave it to intelligent folks here to use their google bar for once). I say install cameras at major intersections on on major roadways known to have issues with traffic that is unable to adhere to the advertised speed.
In fact, Germany is a point in case also. The only time you see Polizei pull someone over on the side of the road is if they were in gross violation. They leave the small stuff to the cameras, who bring in more automated revenue in an hour than any single officer could do in an entire day of traffic patrol. This leaves more officers (witha bigger budget, I may add) able to do...I don't know...real police work, rather than babysitting the driving public.
So I say, as an average taxpaying citizen, bring on the cameras! People are mostly dumb, but after they start getting $50 ticket after ticket, with two pictures of them driving their cars in clear view, and clear evidence of the violation (excessive speed, failure to observe signal changes at an intersection, etc.), maybe they will start to change their ways and start driving a little safer. And those folks who get excessive tickets? Next time they go down to the DMV to renew their license, or go in to renew their tags, someone might bring up the fact that they do see an excessive number of violation enforcements, and maybe reccommend a few driving courses...
BTW, I commute in a carpool over 140 km each way every day up and down IH-35 in Texas. I have seen every kind of driver under the sun. Hence the reason I say that the average driver is pretty dumb. They almost always drive in excess of the posted speed limit, and are usually distracted by the phone conversation they are having, or drinking/eating, I have seen people try to work on their laptop while driving, let alone a smart phone. And I have seen accidents that will set your hair on end. Makes me all the more aware that I drive with both hands on the wheel and both eyes in constant motion, aware of everything aroud me, especially that poor distracted idiot three lanes over who is drifting into my lane (without a turn signal, of course) and wants to try and prove that two objects can exist in the same place at the same time. Yep, if we had cameras on these folks, we would either have to reduce taxes because of so much income, or they will either be forced off the road or start reforming their behavior. Either way, it's all good from my perspective.
This is news HOW?
Of course Republicrats don't give a damn about the environment...or, rather, they are only concerned about it if it means profits for their cronies (and themselves) in the end. For instance, if they can charge more for an incidental change that doesn't increase their costs, but it is beneficial for the environment, then all is good with the world. If they have to pay more, then they will only do it if they are forced into it by laws, and then, only if they can't get a variance in the law in their favor. I've seen this happen time and time again with zoning requirements, impermeable ground cover and runoff/retention requirements.
As for the tiered scheme...this only applies to residential customers. Businesses get a huge break on rates per gallon as their usage increases. Residential customers usually end up subsidizing businesses. Consider that a catfish farm just outside of San Antonio uses as much water as the entire city of San Antonio...and I bet the owners don't pay nearly as much as all the residential customers of San Antonio combined.
"Honest officer! My car is infected with malware and it told it to speed down the road at 95 miles per hour!"
Far more convenient than binary...
Nuclear power has had the same problems for years. In order to operate, the plant has to generate a base capacity. When the grid requirement would drop below this base capacity, the plant would then have to push this power somewhere else. For a lot of plants that had different reservoirs at differing elevations, they would use the excess power to pump water from the lower reservoir into the higher one. Then, when the grid needed more power, they would run the water the other way and capture the "stored" energy using turbines.
You don't even have to electrolyze water for H2 and O2, nor do you have to pump water. Something as simple as compressed air can store energy in the short term, which could then be recaptured later. Yes, batteries can be used in this capacity as well, but then you have all the issues you have to deal with when you maintain battery cells. Compressed air is simple...a tank stores the air, and a turbine captures the kinetic energy from that stored air once it is released from the tank.
This stuff soooo reminds me of the pseudo-science crap that a lot of cults use to justify their beliefs. If you buy into this pile of manure then you deserve to lose every single penny in your pockets.
It seems all they have to do is put some letters after their name and fill the article with indecipherable jargon and lovely TLAs (that's three-letter-acronyms, folks) to make it sound like they know what they are talking about. Add to it, they then talk about something that even experts have problems fully understanding (like quantum mechanics, string theory, etc.) and increase their credibility factor with the unwashed civilians.
And if anyone calls them on the BS they are shoveling, they discredit the non-believer by calling their expertise into question ("Hey, he doesn't have any letters after his name" or "he doesn't use the correct jargon" or "he doesn't know the meaning of the TLAs we use"). A true subject matter expert is usually the first guy to authoritatively admit he doesn't know everything in his field of expertise and still has a lot to learn. These are the humble folks who willingly share what they have learned in the hope that the person they are sharing with will bring new insight to the field.
Who said anything about rebooting? You can do this with another log-in, and just switch users when you want to browse *questionable* sites. Or how about running this in a VM? It has hardware access, but no links to your main file system, though it will appear on your desktop just like any other browser window. I could easily see Apple implementing this using current open source solutions. So you could launch Safari, and then Really Safe Safari.
I will have to agree on this point. Also, you don't want to develop in an environment and/or language that no one else in your organization is familiar with unless you plan on supporting that code ad infinitum. For instance, if I know someone else if going to be following up after I am done, I tend to be a lot more verbose with my comments in the source. I also avoid using a large number of "shortcuts" that I know other developers are not familiar with.
.NET developer in the head.
The ubiquity of Windows is sometimes a good thing. Hiring a decent C++ or Java developer is very difficult, especially one who is willing to come in and work with your undocumented legacy code. You throw a stone and you will probably hit a halfway decent
You know...if any of the students were caught nude, or even en flagrante...this could very well turn into criminal prosecution since any such pictures, taken of underage minors, is, in fact, child pornography. Let's lock up the sick bastards who would take snapshots of kids in various states of undress...and most expecially if they are caught in any sex acts with other minors...
Let's see...
1) Dell: I know several business owners who have been so burned by Dell in the past that it would take a miracle for them to go back. Sure, they have made good machines in the past, but I think we can all remember the whole GX270 bursting capacitors issue? One such business owner was stuck with 2 pallets of computers he had to eventually write off because Dell refused to support them any further.
2) Hewlett-Packard: Nearly the same boat as Dell. Sure, their corporate support is pretty good, but with most of the companies I have dealt with over the years (150-200 employees), these folks barely show up as a blip on their radars. So when one customer gets one bad server after another, and has to go through phone support from someone with a very heavy Mumbai accent each time, they begin to feel like the integrator really just doesn't care.
3) Local PC Shop: Yeah, don't go there. Sometimes, they are perfect for the job. More often than not, you end up with a guy who slaps one piece of hardware together with another, loads the OS and drivers and looks the other way when everything goes belly up because the configuration isn't a tested, proven environment. Not something I would trust for running mission-critical applications like your SQL server, etc.
The one company that actually followed my recommendation and went with Apple desktops backed up by FreeBSD servers absolutely loves the setup. Their network admin, who used to manage AIX servers years before, loved FreeBSD and was right at home getting everything set up, and even though he was new to OS X, he found them very easy to configure, especially since all he had to do to feel comfortable making changes to each system was to launch the terminal (or remote from his own desktop) and use the more familiar bash commands to diagnose problems and/or set up new configurations. To add to the mix, all the desktop hardware and software support was backed up by Apple. Granted, the servers were still supported by a local shop, but once you get past the hardware and driver issues, FreeBSD is rock-solid.
Apple doesn't need to dominate the server room to make an impact on business. There are other, much more suitable Posix operating systems that do that job much better. Nope, their strength is entirely based on interoperability with those servers as well as ease-of-use for both admins and the end users. Add to that a plethora of applications that are designed to make businesses work.
Um, to add more fire to your argument, coal is also responsible for releasing more radioactive substances into the environment that nuclear power.
Not as much as you would think. RISC (and ARM) is not anathema to Intel design strategy, and if Apple gives them some play in the game (though Apple has the talent on staff to do their own design), then the applications of ARM-based, Apple-designed chips might be in Intel's favor for the future, especially if they see major operating systems (such as, Windows) traditionally developed only for the x86 market starting the gain purchase in the ARM arena.
I guess what I am trying to say is that while Intel would be happiest if the solution to their future relationship with Apple came from in-house, they would not look the other way if their gift horse came riding to them with Steve Jobs on it's back. It keeps Apple coming to them as a one-stop shop (and that's not insignificant, especially looking at future iPhone and iPad numbers) as well as giving them an edge on seeing the inside development of latest-gen ARM-based processors without having to ante up for the license, since Apple would be footing that bill.
Ahhhh...someone who ascribes to the theory that anyone can program. Yes, this is true, just like anyone can cook, as long as they know how to follow a recipe.
But here is the rub...anyone can cook, just not everyone is able to eat it. You still have to find people who can come up with new and original recipes if you are looking for something different. And this is something not everyone can do.
Or should I use the painting analogy? Anyone can paint. My three-year-old self was more than able to splat finger paints on a piece of paper that might be reasonably construed as a house, but aside from my mother, no one would call it artwork comparable to any of the great masters, let alone an undergraduate student in his third year of art school. And others do things like trace someone else's art and call it theirs, or use a stencil or decoupage instead of creating their own original art. I've seen this too, both in art and in programming.
And while you may be able to distill one portion or another of this talent and bottle it up into a curriculum that you can teach, a lot of the ability to see a problem and conceive a powerful and efficient solution (or any solution at all) that doesn't exist in a formula is not a skill that can be taught, but raw talent that must be trained. You will find that great programmers approach solutions to problems much the same way a mathematician is able to solve problems in complex systems.
Not every problem in the world has been solved. And people will continue to conceive new problems looking for solutions every day. Identifying the problem is only the beginning...coming up with a solution is where the real genius lies. And if you go out there looking for the lowest bidder, more often than not, you will get what you pay for. Trust me, I have fixed more than my share of code coming out of India or China.