Acceptance of copyright doesn't have to be a binary position. The person you misquoted #7 to clearly supports copyright, but only with appropriate constraints.
Once those constraints are broken then the value to society is gone, and thus society should reject it. He's rejecting the broken implementation.
can say with near certainty that perhaps 20% -- maybe 30% -- of those would understand that a Mylar bag would block GPS.
1 - I had to look up Mylar because I've never heard of it. So count me in the 70-80% from the outset 2 - Mylar is plastic. I would assume that a plastic I've never heard of will not stop electromagnetic radiation. Guess I'm still in the 70-80% 3 - Turns out Mylar is polyester. Right now I'd be sacking any fucking electrician in the 20-30% that thinks you can build a working faraday cage out of polyester
Maybe you should clarify on whether the Mylar bag is actually a metal foil bag that's just using Mylar for added strength, gas/moisture barrier purposes and/or electrical resistivity.
Me, I'm still in the 70-80%, confused to hell why a Mylar bag would block GPS.
No, they'd just have more time to focus on the aspects of management other than supervision.
I have a manager. She deals with shit so that I don't have to, argues with HR and her manager to get me pay rises, and lets me know the things she's being asked to help with.
In return I sometimes help her with them. Sometimes I just do my own thing and let her know. Sometimes I don't let her know; I tend to be rather good at getting credit for the work I do anyway, without needing the shameless self promotion.
Fancy a chance at surviving a serious head injury, especially if it may take months or years to recover? Don't sign up to being an organ donor: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/1...
I'd like to, but I'd be prosecuted under the Computer Misuse Act and it's unlikely I'd be able to track down and destroy all of their backups anyway.
Tempting, but I think to be certain you'd need nation level resources, insider assistance and some serious planning. Hmm. Anybody got Putin's number, I think I can talk him into it.
I found Saints Row III to be one of the best ones. It let me create an avatar that looked like a young slim chinese woman with sharp cheekbones and a goatee.
I disagree. I'm fine with using DNA to eliminate a suspect ("This DNA can't possibly be that person") and with furnishing the police with a list of interesting people to further investigate.
I don't believe though that DNA should ever be used to convict someone. There may be very few false positives but there will be some, and that's too many for it to be reliable in court.
The whole forensic process is flawed, the DNA analysis is rarely uncontaminated, the subset of DNA markers is too small, the risks of false positives is too high and the history of bad convictions too extensive.
DNA evidence can be very helpful, but never use it to convict.
Maybe if Tesla sold a car that doesn't spend half of a 600 mile journey stationary the journalist wouldn't have to highlight the limitations of the vehicle.
But no, apparently Tesla cars are for people that only take the shortest possible route between two points, and stop at every charging station on the way. Because otherwise they'll run out of power.
I remember queuing to get through the border between Holland and Germany.
I remember forgetting my passport one day, and not realising until I was the other side of the border - they hadn't checked. I was people-smuggled back home.
Pai has also openly said he wants to prevent municipal broadband by removing state's ability to create their own laws.
This is what tells me he's got absolutely no interest in benefits for normal people, and that casts massive doubt on his motives for changing the FCC approach to net neutrality.
I'm not sure 'are patents property' is even relevant.
Lets assume that the plaintiffs are correct and that patents are 'real' property. So fucking what?
The PTAB isn't depriving anybody of their property. They're merely highlighting that the property does not qualify for protection by the government.
So by all means, have your patent, enjoy being able to declare it in your property portfolio. Just don't expect the government or courts to support you if you try to prevent someone else from having or using the same idea.
As a fan of quality cinema, enjoying films that match compelling visuals with memorable soundtracks, challenging the viewer with emotionally complex and multifaceted stories, I think you're completely wrong.
Sucker Punch is flat out amazing. Easily his best film.
Slashdot Mirror
Acceptance of copyright doesn't have to be a binary position. The person you misquoted #7 to clearly supports copyright, but only with appropriate constraints.
Once those constraints are broken then the value to society is gone, and thus society should reject it. He's rejecting the broken implementation.
That's not unethical.
can say with near certainty that perhaps 20% -- maybe 30% -- of those would understand that a Mylar bag would block GPS.
1 - I had to look up Mylar because I've never heard of it. So count me in the 70-80% from the outset
2 - Mylar is plastic. I would assume that a plastic I've never heard of will not stop electromagnetic radiation. Guess I'm still in the 70-80%
3 - Turns out Mylar is polyester. Right now I'd be sacking any fucking electrician in the 20-30% that thinks you can build a working faraday cage out of polyester
Maybe you should clarify on whether the Mylar bag is actually a metal foil bag that's just using Mylar for added strength, gas/moisture barrier purposes and/or electrical resistivity.
Me, I'm still in the 70-80%, confused to hell why a Mylar bag would block GPS.
No, they'd just have more time to focus on the aspects of management other than supervision.
I have a manager. She deals with shit so that I don't have to, argues with HR and her manager to get me pay rises, and lets me know the things she's being asked to help with.
In return I sometimes help her with them. Sometimes I just do my own thing and let her know. Sometimes I don't let her know; I tend to be rather good at getting credit for the work I do anyway, without needing the shameless self promotion.
most medical professionals would find this deeply insulting
Yeah, they like to pretend they're doing good rather than being purely commercial about it. e.g.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/p...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d...
Fancy a chance at surviving a serious head injury, especially if it may take months or years to recover? Don't sign up to being an organ donor: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/1...
This court case appears to be still ongoing: https://nypost.com/2012/09/26/...
All of which begs the question of why you're clearly wrong, as demonstrated by my usage of the phrase in question.
You have however gained financial wealth over time. That's either a capital gain, or an income. Both are taxable.
How you gained it is only of interest when working out which aspect of the tax legislation applies.
That's a terribly inelegant and lazy way of doing it. I use this approach too :)
I'd like to, but I'd be prosecuted under the Computer Misuse Act and it's unlikely I'd be able to track down and destroy all of their backups anyway.
Tempting, but I think to be certain you'd need nation level resources, insider assistance and some serious planning. Hmm. Anybody got Putin's number, I think I can talk him into it.
Hmm, lots of fun to be had.
I found Saints Row III to be one of the best ones. It let me create an avatar that looked like a young slim chinese woman with sharp cheekbones and a goatee.
She was disturbingly attractive.
From https://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca...
The stand-alone Windows executable does not require Perl.
Sounds to me like the Windows version is superior.
Do you seriously believe every dope dealer, thief, rapist, etc. is entitled to that?
Yes. More importantly, I also believe that everybody accused of being a dope dealer, thief, rapist, etc. is entitled to that.
Take the plea, do the time, pay the fine
The whole plea system in the US is a horrific barrier to justice, particularly when matched to the cost of a capable legal defence.
I disagree. I'm fine with using DNA to eliminate a suspect ("This DNA can't possibly be that person") and with furnishing the police with a list of interesting people to further investigate.
I don't believe though that DNA should ever be used to convict someone. There may be very few false positives but there will be some, and that's too many for it to be reliable in court.
The whole forensic process is flawed, the DNA analysis is rarely uncontaminated, the subset of DNA markers is too small, the risks of false positives is too high and the history of bad convictions too extensive.
DNA evidence can be very helpful, but never use it to convict.
If only you could randomly generate a number between 0 and 1 of arbitrary precision by using a d10 die to determine each individual digit.
Maybe if Tesla sold a car that doesn't spend half of a 600 mile journey stationary the journalist wouldn't have to highlight the limitations of the vehicle.
But no, apparently Tesla cars are for people that only take the shortest possible route between two points, and stop at every charging station on the way. Because otherwise they'll run out of power.
Hmm. That would take five solid days on my home link.
This is why I don't use the cloud as a serious back up option :(
Tesla called out a journalist who ran out of power for
..driving a car? Really, Tesla are serious fucking bullies.
within the EU Schengen area
I remember queuing to get through the border between Holland and Germany.
I remember forgetting my passport one day, and not realising until I was the other side of the border - they hadn't checked. I was people-smuggled back home.
I have flappy paddles but rarely use them.
I switched to an automatic because the clutch work was killing my left knee. Don't really miss changing gears manually any more.
If you want to avoid being racist about this, remove the word 'Indian' from your post. The rest still holds up perfectly.
As it is, whether you love them or not, you're being a twat.
Pai has also openly said he wants to prevent municipal broadband by removing state's ability to create their own laws.
This is what tells me he's got absolutely no interest in benefits for normal people, and that casts massive doubt on his motives for changing the FCC approach to net neutrality.
This isn't even ideological. This feels corrupt.
My Samsung S7 does that too, although fortunately not too frequently.
It does learn though - it can now autocorrect the word 'fuck' for me.
I'm not sure 'are patents property' is even relevant.
Lets assume that the plaintiffs are correct and that patents are 'real' property. So fucking what?
The PTAB isn't depriving anybody of their property. They're merely highlighting that the property does not qualify for protection by the government.
So by all means, have your patent, enjoy being able to declare it in your property portfolio. Just don't expect the government or courts to support you if you try to prevent someone else from having or using the same idea.
That was my immediate interpretation, yeah.
50 years in a US prison - or share some details about your work. No wonder the Russians don't want him over there.
every other Zach Snyder movie since 300
As a fan of quality cinema, enjoying films that match compelling visuals with memorable soundtracks, challenging the viewer with emotionally complex and multifaceted stories, I think you're completely wrong.
Sucker Punch is flat out amazing. Easily his best film.
So when you say a newborn is an atheist
Well, I didn't, but technically it is true. Weak or strong is pretty fucking irrelevant to me, I just don't believe.
Unlike KeensMustard, who clearly believes in his own bullshit. sigh.