You want people to give you confidential information to perform an encoding they could just as easily do on their own? The confidentiality of your proprietary software does not trump the confidentiality of medical data.
sometime in the next 15 to 30 years... even the skeptics can accept it.... has no animosity toward religion.
Must be new here.
There is no amount of evidence that could convince these people, because their minds don't operate like that. A scientist observes and builds a model of reality to explain observations. The creationist doesn't need to observe, because he already has a perfect model of reality. Any observations that contradict it are to be ignored, lied about, or dismissed. When a creationist claims to ask for evidence, his intention is not to learn, because he already has perfect knowledge. His intention is to ensnare the audience in a web of lies. This is a discipline called apologetics, in which the only objective of a debate is to score points by hook or by crook. Feeding evidence to them is to feed an endless abyss that spits all of your information back at you, distorted, that listens only to find ambiguities or gaps in your knowledge, to fill them with religion. Give them better evidence, and they will not thank you - they will be angry at you, because you're making them work harder to twist and refute you. Annoy them enough, and they will attack your character personally and professionally.
Once Mr. Leakey realizes this, he will no longer lack animosity toward religion.
Doesn't the VP of a company as huge as SAP make enough shitloads of cash without robbing a toy store? $30k, isn't that like two months' salary or something?
"Carry the most passengers as fast as possible for as little money as possible" sounds quite universal, and dominates in the long term over investments like the cost of new stations.
Slashdot Mirror
For repeated demonstrated incompetence?
Seriously, this woman's supposed to be a lawyer?
Just get your pony off BitTorrent.
"You wouldn't download a pony"?
Fuck that, of course I would.
You want people to give you confidential information to perform an encoding they could just as easily do on their own? The confidentiality of your proprietary software does not trump the confidentiality of medical data.
Instead, they should simply pass legislation that forbids the sea from rising. On penalty of fines or whipping. Problem solved.
They get harder, and these days I'm four for five at best.
Maybe I'm just a machine dreaming I'm human?
Does it have to be a fat cat?
> the minor miners
*rimshot*
How do you offer a dog a Google-like working environment?
20% of your work time is free for burying bones?
Conveniently, this is also an extremely efficient test for concussion and bone fractures. Never a false positive. Or a negative.
Preemptively attacking people who say you're wrong doesn't make you less wrong. It just makes it obvious that you already know you're wrong.
Must be new here.
There is no amount of evidence that could convince these people, because their minds don't operate like that. A scientist observes and builds a model of reality to explain observations. The creationist doesn't need to observe, because he already has a perfect model of reality. Any observations that contradict it are to be ignored, lied about, or dismissed. When a creationist claims to ask for evidence, his intention is not to learn, because he already has perfect knowledge. His intention is to ensnare the audience in a web of lies. This is a discipline called apologetics, in which the only objective of a debate is to score points by hook or by crook. Feeding evidence to them is to feed an endless abyss that spits all of your information back at you, distorted, that listens only to find ambiguities or gaps in your knowledge, to fill them with religion. Give them better evidence, and they will not thank you - they will be angry at you, because you're making them work harder to twist and refute you. Annoy them enough, and they will attack your character personally and professionally.
Once Mr. Leakey realizes this, he will no longer lack animosity toward religion.
Paging John Connor...
I guess they meant gigawatt hours per hour. :P
In other news, the speed of light is one lightyear annually.
... they spent a billion dollars on something they already had.
Hung up by Al Quaeda.
Doesn't the VP of a company as huge as SAP make enough shitloads of cash without robbing a toy store? $30k, isn't that like two months' salary or something?
That's... an oddly specific assurance.
By reason of depression.
Against the MPAA, of course.
Right?
Namely, the increased risk that your data will become collateral damage in the War On Piracy.
Who cares about the drivel they emit?
Leaving aside the question of how morally wrong this is (very), isn't it completely illegal?
Someone at A***e has their h**d up their a*s.
I'm predicting 37.000038567.
"Carry the most passengers as fast as possible for as little money as possible" sounds quite universal, and dominates in the long term over investments like the cost of new stations.