I sure hope none of that is news to anyone, because it's what "classified" has meant for at least the last 70 years and probably a lot longer.
Anyone who thinks that "classified" means something like super duper secret is either uninformed or an idiot.
This,
For crying out loud, no shit there are levels of classified.
It covers everything from "in confidence" to "you'll get shot for even breathing about this".
The Clinton emails were probably along the lines of commercial in confidence, not vital state secrets.
Hey, but it's another reason to bash Obama, seeing as you cant find anything legitimately wrong, the Fox News types have to deliberately misinterpret words to make it sound worse than it really is.
I doubt his dashcam has enough resolution to tell the difference between a phone and a wallet.
Its still failing to pay due care and attention whilst operating a motor vehicle (or however the law is worded in your country). Also the judge wont buy that excuse, you are far from the first armchair lawyer they've come across and probably not the first time they've heard that lame excuse today.
I personally can think of an easy way of avoiding this completely:
If you see red and blue lights, put your phone in airplane mode, throw it under the seat, and deny you even have one. Same if you're involved in a collision. If the cop asks to search your car, tell him that his rights to search your car are about as good as your rights to give him a cavity search.
LoL,
If you see Red and Blue, its too late. You wont have time to put the phone in aeroplane mode, you definitely wont be able to do it without the officers noticing.
No you cant, dont argue with me, you are not as clever as you think you are.
The reason idiots get caught on their phone is because they get so distracted by it that they become completely oblivious to anything around them. Green lights, concrete bollards, other vehicles and the cop walking up right next to them. Also all your "clever" tricks are also dead givaways, no-one sits in the car and stares intently at their crotch for 5 minutes unless they've got a phone down there.
I can think of a much easier solution, put the fucking phone away whilst you're driving. If this is too onerous or you think you're good enough that it doesn't apply to you (clue by four: you are not), start taking the bus.
Cars are recalled all the time. Or worse, they aren't recalled because it's cheaper to pay out for dead and maimed people. Why is this article about fear instead of praising Tesla for catching this before anyone got hurt?
Good manufacturers care about repeat customers so they're proactive about recalls. Bad manufacturers wait until someone dies.
This is why Toyota has more recalls than GM. It's not that GM cars are more reliable than Toyotas (or that GM cars are even reliable) its that Toyota would rather replace a seat belt buckle that has a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of failing under extreme circumstances like the vehicle being overloaded, the seatbelt being buckled improperly and the moons of Jupiter must also be in perfect alignment in order to cause a failure... As opposed to waiting until a faulty ignition kills 17 people.
I'd say it is THAT good considering it was made over a few months by 2 guys on a budget of a fiver.
You're right about it's flaws, but the game was still better than most AAA dreck with a hundred times it's budget. COD has been using repetition since 2004, the same game gets released every year.
Well yes, at least early on. The game IS better balanced than Fallout 3. You know how it was
I'd have to disagree. If you didn't use VATS and played FO:3 like a normal FPS, you were pretty much sniping everything. Taking out super mutants at level 4-5 was not difficult. FO:NV and 4 were easier because you didn't have your non-VATS accuracy tied to the guns skill.
Also with FO you didn't stay at the low levels for very long, you got to L2 just by leaving the Vault. I'm usually at L4 before leaving the vicinity of Megaton. However the concept of turning into a one man killing machine armed to the teeth is a concept that dates back to the original FO games (the top down ones). Klamath in FO:2 was hard until you came back an few levels later and wiped out Metzger's gang without breaking a sweat.
"You don't have to have the multi-million dollar budgets to make great games -- I've seen a huge amount of evidence for that tonight," said Sean Brennan.
I think that used to be true. In the 80s and 90s perhaps, you could start small.
You still can.
Whilst I feel Fallout 4 deserved its award despite not being as good as New Vegas, personally I would have awarded it to Rebel Galaxy as it managed to do far more with the money it had.
Games like Rebel Galaxy and Planetbase are good examples that you dont need multi-million dollar budgets and huge names to make a great game. Even competing head to head, Cities: Skylines outperformed Sim City 4 with far less of a budget by simply being a better city sim.
For the most part I ignore the huge, $200 million crapfests that come out of major publishing houses these days. I couldn't care less about the latest Snooze of Duty or whatever crud has Tom Clancy's name on it. Fallout seems to be the exception rather than the rule when it comes to AAA budget games these days.
I'm by no means a gaming hipster who only places games no-one has ever heard of, I liked FO4 (as well as SCII LOTV) but I find the problem to be the state of the industry. I'd like big budget games to be a little more adventurous, right now they're too dumbed down, too cliched and too bland because Activision et al. are too scared of alienating any part of western society (erm, insulting Russians and Arabs is fine though). However the thing is, if you want to make an interesting story, you need to take risks with it.
I have the same problem with gameplay, a lot of AAA FPS's have boiled down to "press X to do everything". Again this is due to the publishers not wanting to offend those who have no skill. Having the player actually do something, or shock horror, use their brain seems to be the antithesis of AAA game design. Its one thing to have a smooth, fluid dnyamic when it comes to interfaces and controls, but you cant achieve this by removing just about everything you can do. The last COD I played had pretty much boiled itself down to two options, move and shoot. so you pretty much only needed two buttons. I dont believe that has improved since 2005.
Finally what stood out with FO:4 for me was no regenerating health. Yes, the other crutch the COD series relies on. You actually had to manage resources, going in guns blazing on 20 hp was a sure fire way to die, sometimes you needed to eat irradiated food to survive or go the long way around and hope you didn't encounter any ghouls. Hell, going in guns blazing as a LV 4 character at the Corvega factory was asking to die. You had to be a little tactical, a little thoughtful in your actions. Hey, but as I said, FO:4 was the exception, not the rule when it comes to AAA games.
/sips cup of proper tea, not that Lipton nonsense.
Well you see the British are a progressive lot, except when it comes to naming. The BAFTA is the academy for modern art forms such as film and television and so it was natural to extend this to video games. The problem is BAFTA is a recognised name and therefore, cannot be easily changed as their role evolves. This is why the MOT is still called the Ministry of Transport instead of the Department of Vehicle Bastardry.
The introduction of video games into the BAFTAs has been a big thing in recent years and I think, better off for it.
Labor aren't much better with "think of the children" Conroy running the show. The Greens did block certain legislation but may face voter backlash over senate voting rules.
The Pirates have their own party. But I think I'll vote for the Science Party; who wouldn't want to live in a 21st century metropolis named after Alan Turing?:)
That's not such a bad thing. Conroy over 6 years in the Rudd/Gillard government got repeatedly smacked down by his own party for the filter. Each time it was proposed the Labor backbench, not just the greens, threatened to revolt. I dont even think it made it to parliament to even be voted on.
Besides that, the current shadow communications minister is Jason Claire and he seems a hell of a lot more competent and clued in over it. The Labor/Green govt always runs on populist policies, rather than ideological ones like the LNP. Its good in the fact that they wont pursue something that is outright dangerous, but bad because often it means they dont do much at all.
I've got a hell of a lot more trust in Claire than Turnbull and Fifield who have been doing their best to destroy the NBN and help Murdoch. Conroy has effectively been neutered by Labor.
You're awfully confident that Murdoch won't repeat previous strategies. And, current poll results notwithstanding, memories of the Rudd/Gillard disasters are still fresh.
I'm absolutely confident that Murdoch will try and fail.
The Abottbull government has been an absolute shambles from the word go. Murdoch may be good at spin, but he cant work miracles. The only thing keeping Turnbull from dropping in the polls has been the relentless media assault on Bill Shorten, the problem with relentless media assaults is that they become passe and then get ignored as people start to realise they've heard it all before.
The difference is that in 2013, Murdoch had to sell an unkown to an angry populace. Now they've got to sell a failure to an angry and aggrieved populace. This means the usual spin tactics will be completely useless as they have to try to make Shorten more unpopular than an extremerly unpopular government. Shouting "Boats, Boats, Boats, Boaty, boat boat boat" wont cut it this time.
What is important to note here is that within the next 12 months Australia will hold a federal election.
The increasing unpopularity of the Turnbull government (which was really just the Abbott government with a new hat) means that there will likely be a change in parties even if Bill Shorten isn't replaced.
The media conglomerates are considerably more chummy with the current Liberal party (dont let the name confuse you, they're conservatives) than they do with the opposition (Labor party). Doubly so as one of the primary drivers is Rupert Murdoch's media empire which has not won any favours with Labor in recent years.
With Labor back in power, we can expect the same thing that's been happening for years to continue. It will be discussed, papers will be filed, faults will be found with perspective new laws and it'll have to be put off until Parliament sits again in a few months, rinse and repeat.
$413 dollars in developer time to create the app and $336,000.59 in corporate overhead and bloat, the additional $1,000,000 is just for Evil
Government contracts == License to bill.
Having worked on both sides of the government contracting fence it's not that the governments of the world are inefficient, it's that they're ineffectual.
Government departments know and certainly care that they're getting ripped off, but they aren't permitted to do a thing about it. Companies know that is once given a job, it'll never go out to tender again so it's theirs to abuse as they see fit. Departments are not able to change the procurement process half way though no matter how disastrously it's going... but I'm sure the provider has a solution to fix that... it'll only be another $100,000.
This is to say, he downloaded 1 TB on a mobile connection.
People in Australia have been able to download 1TB per day on wired HFC/Fibre connections for years. You could even do it on ADSL if you're dedicated and close enough to an exchange.
For one as limited as you, you may struggle to see the connection but it is obvious.
It is largely a zero sum game with a run off valve. There are X pounds in tax to be paid, there are Y pounds circulating around the economy, there are also Z costs that need to be paid. When greedy citizen A uses the run off valve to remove some of the money for his own purposes, this means that the shortfall in X has to be covered by the rest of us in the form of higher taxes. This affects the lowest earning citizens the most and yes, in many cases literally means they cannot afford food or other necessities.
You see the issue is, when you and I, as working stiffs hide our money from Mr Cameron, he sends some nice men from HMRC to your house with a nice letter that says "pay or go to jail". However when someone like Mr Cameron does it, he's hard done by.
No, the governments have plenty of money.
Only the truly naive believe this. The fact is a lot of costs need to be paid and if not paid by the government end up being pushed onto you with a markup. The US health insurance system is a good demonstration of this. Despite all the flaws of the NHS, it's still cheaper than the US system and more effective for anyone except those earning above 150,000 pounds.
No, their policy of making people take off their shoes is causing long lines.
Belts and jackets too.
I generally like to wear nice clothes when flying, I'm part of the old school who remembers when flying was expensive so people dressed up for it. However when flying domestically in the US I've resorted to T-shirts and shorts because if that belt comes off, so do my trousers.
Clinton has pissed in too many cereal bowls, made too many backroom deals. She's damaged goods...
I'm not an American, but you lot make it hard to ignore US politics so you're getting my 2 pence anyway...
You've demonstrated the biggest problem with US politics here and it's something you see a lot more from the Republican side than the Democrat side. The Republicans know they dont have a candidate with an actual chance. Trump is the most popular one and he hasn't got a chance in hell of being president so they've resorted to personal attacks in an attempt to poison the well. Its the same thing we've seen with Obama for the last 8 odd years, because they couldn't actually find a problem with Obama or the Democrat policies, they've had to resort to questioning his birth, religion, choice of pants, so on and so forth. So they're doing the same with Clinton (who realistically has the sanest economic policies) because they know that they're chances of winning means that they may as well start calling her Madam President right here and now.
When you go after the person, not the policies you're demonstrating that not only do you fail to find fault with their policies, but you also cant find any merit in your own.
Some countries have a complete black ban on political advertising for a week before the election, personally I think this is a good thing as when the shit slinging ceases, people cant talk about actual policies and maybe be a tiny bit informed about the potential repercussions.
I'm surprised there wasn't more information about your brain on Cruz. Or maybe it scared the researchers a little too much.
For most people, the idea of president trump brings about sheer, unadulterated terror. For those that do not experience this, they've found to have very little brain reactions what so every.
So, how does this now play for Apple, who banked on their phones being secure as a selling point?
Yep, Apple screwed themselves hard here.
We've known for some time that Apple's security is largely a product of marketing over engineering with the fact that many times the phone has been jailbroken, as more than one point just by visiting a web site but here because they made such a huge spectacle over it, it cant be buried on the back page of some obscure specialist publication.
So Apple has won a pyrrhic victory but lost a lot more.
It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.
Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'
8.5% is pretty high. Daily intake of sugar should be around 70-100 grams maximum, depending on build, gender, age, so on and so forth. If you drink 1 x 500 ml glass of orange juice, you've just taken half your daily intake of sugar in one fell swoop.
Slashdot Mirror
I sure hope none of that is news to anyone, because it's what "classified" has meant for at least the last 70 years and probably a lot longer.
Anyone who thinks that "classified" means something like super duper secret is either uninformed or an idiot.
This, For crying out loud, no shit there are levels of classified.
It covers everything from "in confidence" to "you'll get shot for even breathing about this".
The Clinton emails were probably along the lines of commercial in confidence, not vital state secrets.
Hey, but it's another reason to bash Obama, seeing as you cant find anything legitimately wrong, the Fox News types have to deliberately misinterpret words to make it sound worse than it really is.
I doubt his dashcam has enough resolution to tell the difference between a phone and a wallet.
Its still failing to pay due care and attention whilst operating a motor vehicle (or however the law is worded in your country). Also the judge wont buy that excuse, you are far from the first armchair lawyer they've come across and probably not the first time they've heard that lame excuse today.
I personally can think of an easy way of avoiding this completely:
If you see red and blue lights, put your phone in airplane mode, throw it under the seat, and deny you even have one. Same if you're involved in a collision. If the cop asks to search your car, tell him that his rights to search your car are about as good as your rights to give him a cavity search.
LoL,
If you see Red and Blue, its too late. You wont have time to put the phone in aeroplane mode, you definitely wont be able to do it without the officers noticing.
No you cant, dont argue with me, you are not as clever as you think you are.
The reason idiots get caught on their phone is because they get so distracted by it that they become completely oblivious to anything around them. Green lights, concrete bollards, other vehicles and the cop walking up right next to them. Also all your "clever" tricks are also dead givaways, no-one sits in the car and stares intently at their crotch for 5 minutes unless they've got a phone down there.
I can think of a much easier solution, put the fucking phone away whilst you're driving. If this is too onerous or you think you're good enough that it doesn't apply to you (clue by four: you are not), start taking the bus.
Cars are recalled all the time. Or worse, they aren't recalled because it's cheaper to pay out for dead and maimed people. Why is this article about fear instead of praising Tesla for catching this before anyone got hurt?
Good manufacturers care about repeat customers so they're proactive about recalls. Bad manufacturers wait until someone dies.
This is why Toyota has more recalls than GM. It's not that GM cars are more reliable than Toyotas (or that GM cars are even reliable) its that Toyota would rather replace a seat belt buckle that has a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of failing under extreme circumstances like the vehicle being overloaded, the seatbelt being buckled improperly and the moons of Jupiter must also be in perfect alignment in order to cause a failure... As opposed to waiting until a faulty ignition kills 17 people.
I'd say it is THAT good considering it was made over a few months by 2 guys on a budget of a fiver.
You're right about it's flaws, but the game was still better than most AAA dreck with a hundred times it's budget. COD has been using repetition since 2004, the same game gets released every year.
I'd have to disagree. If you didn't use VATS and played FO:3 like a normal FPS, you were pretty much sniping everything. Taking out super mutants at level 4-5 was not difficult. FO:NV and 4 were easier because you didn't have your non-VATS accuracy tied to the guns skill.
Also with FO you didn't stay at the low levels for very long, you got to L2 just by leaving the Vault. I'm usually at L4 before leaving the vicinity of Megaton. However the concept of turning into a one man killing machine armed to the teeth is a concept that dates back to the original FO games (the top down ones). Klamath in FO:2 was hard until you came back an few levels later and wiped out Metzger's gang without breaking a sweat.
"You don't have to have the multi-million dollar budgets to make great games -- I've seen a huge amount of evidence for that tonight," said Sean Brennan.
I think that used to be true. In the 80s and 90s perhaps, you could start small.
You still can.
Whilst I feel Fallout 4 deserved its award despite not being as good as New Vegas, personally I would have awarded it to Rebel Galaxy as it managed to do far more with the money it had.
Games like Rebel Galaxy and Planetbase are good examples that you dont need multi-million dollar budgets and huge names to make a great game. Even competing head to head, Cities: Skylines outperformed Sim City 4 with far less of a budget by simply being a better city sim.
For the most part I ignore the huge, $200 million crapfests that come out of major publishing houses these days. I couldn't care less about the latest Snooze of Duty or whatever crud has Tom Clancy's name on it. Fallout seems to be the exception rather than the rule when it comes to AAA budget games these days.
I'm by no means a gaming hipster who only places games no-one has ever heard of, I liked FO4 (as well as SCII LOTV) but I find the problem to be the state of the industry. I'd like big budget games to be a little more adventurous, right now they're too dumbed down, too cliched and too bland because Activision et al. are too scared of alienating any part of western society (erm, insulting Russians and Arabs is fine though). However the thing is, if you want to make an interesting story, you need to take risks with it.
I have the same problem with gameplay, a lot of AAA FPS's have boiled down to "press X to do everything". Again this is due to the publishers not wanting to offend those who have no skill. Having the player actually do something, or shock horror, use their brain seems to be the antithesis of AAA game design. Its one thing to have a smooth, fluid dnyamic when it comes to interfaces and controls, but you cant achieve this by removing just about everything you can do. The last COD I played had pretty much boiled itself down to two options, move and shoot. so you pretty much only needed two buttons. I dont believe that has improved since 2005.
Finally what stood out with FO:4 for me was no regenerating health. Yes, the other crutch the COD series relies on. You actually had to manage resources, going in guns blazing on 20 hp was a sure fire way to die, sometimes you needed to eat irradiated food to survive or go the long way around and hope you didn't encounter any ghouls. Hell, going in guns blazing as a LV 4 character at the Corvega factory was asking to die. You had to be a little tactical, a little thoughtful in your actions. Hey, but as I said, FO:4 was the exception, not the rule when it comes to AAA games.
What do films have to do with games?
/sips cup of proper tea, not that Lipton nonsense.
Well you see the British are a progressive lot, except when it comes to naming. The BAFTA is the academy for modern art forms such as film and television and so it was natural to extend this to video games. The problem is BAFTA is a recognised name and therefore, cannot be easily changed as their role evolves. This is why the MOT is still called the Ministry of Transport instead of the Department of Vehicle Bastardry.
The introduction of video games into the BAFTAs has been a big thing in recent years and I think, better off for it.
I find everything works better on a Mac after it's been dropped on the concrete... because then I can go buy a decent laptop like an Asus or Toshiba.
I rather smell robort pr0n appearing soon on internet...
And does that smell like burning wire insulation?
you can shave with a pc just now. Just use a blade server.
Gillette have just released their new 6 blade server rack. Complete with lubricating strip.
Labor aren't much better with "think of the children" Conroy running the show. The Greens did block certain legislation but may face voter backlash over senate voting rules.
The Pirates have their own party. But I think I'll vote for the Science Party; who wouldn't want to live in a 21st century metropolis named after Alan Turing? :)
That's not such a bad thing. Conroy over 6 years in the Rudd/Gillard government got repeatedly smacked down by his own party for the filter. Each time it was proposed the Labor backbench, not just the greens, threatened to revolt. I dont even think it made it to parliament to even be voted on.
Besides that, the current shadow communications minister is Jason Claire and he seems a hell of a lot more competent and clued in over it. The Labor/Green govt always runs on populist policies, rather than ideological ones like the LNP. Its good in the fact that they wont pursue something that is outright dangerous, but bad because often it means they dont do much at all.
I've got a hell of a lot more trust in Claire than Turnbull and Fifield who have been doing their best to destroy the NBN and help Murdoch. Conroy has effectively been neutered by Labor.
You're awfully confident that Murdoch won't repeat previous strategies. And, current poll results notwithstanding, memories of the Rudd/Gillard disasters are still fresh.
I'm absolutely confident that Murdoch will try and fail.
The Abottbull government has been an absolute shambles from the word go. Murdoch may be good at spin, but he cant work miracles. The only thing keeping Turnbull from dropping in the polls has been the relentless media assault on Bill Shorten, the problem with relentless media assaults is that they become passe and then get ignored as people start to realise they've heard it all before.
The difference is that in 2013, Murdoch had to sell an unkown to an angry populace. Now they've got to sell a failure to an angry and aggrieved populace. This means the usual spin tactics will be completely useless as they have to try to make Shorten more unpopular than an extremerly unpopular government. Shouting "Boats, Boats, Boats, Boaty, boat boat boat" wont cut it this time.
What is important to note here is that within the next 12 months Australia will hold a federal election.
The increasing unpopularity of the Turnbull government (which was really just the Abbott government with a new hat) means that there will likely be a change in parties even if Bill Shorten isn't replaced.
The media conglomerates are considerably more chummy with the current Liberal party (dont let the name confuse you, they're conservatives) than they do with the opposition (Labor party). Doubly so as one of the primary drivers is Rupert Murdoch's media empire which has not won any favours with Labor in recent years.
With Labor back in power, we can expect the same thing that's been happening for years to continue. It will be discussed, papers will be filed, faults will be found with perspective new laws and it'll have to be put off until Parliament sits again in a few months, rinse and repeat.
$413 dollars in developer time to create the app and $336,000.59 in corporate overhead and bloat, the additional $1,000,000 is just for Evil
Government contracts == License to bill.
Having worked on both sides of the government contracting fence it's not that the governments of the world are inefficient, it's that they're ineffectual.
Government departments know and certainly care that they're getting ripped off, but they aren't permitted to do a thing about it. Companies know that is once given a job, it'll never go out to tender again so it's theirs to abuse as they see fit. Departments are not able to change the procurement process half way though no matter how disastrously it's going... but I'm sure the provider has a solution to fix that... it'll only be another $100,000.
This is to say, he downloaded 1 TB on a mobile connection.
People in Australia have been able to download 1TB per day on wired HFC/Fibre connections for years. You could even do it on ADSL if you're dedicated and close enough to an exchange.
I also feel the need to point out that this act is almost literally the definition of digital piracy.
Arrrr, me crew and I have taken ye browser and seek 200 gold pieces for it's safe return.
Although "extortion" might be the better word for it in the modern parlance.
Even less surprisingly, top Russian communist leader corrupt...news at 11.
Nyet tovarich,
He is now top Russian capitalist leader corrupt.
All hail glorious march to bright capitalist future.
For one as limited as you, you may struggle to see the connection but it is obvious. It is largely a zero sum game with a run off valve. There are X pounds in tax to be paid, there are Y pounds circulating around the economy, there are also Z costs that need to be paid. When greedy citizen A uses the run off valve to remove some of the money for his own purposes, this means that the shortfall in X has to be covered by the rest of us in the form of higher taxes. This affects the lowest earning citizens the most and yes, in many cases literally means they cannot afford food or other necessities.
You see the issue is, when you and I, as working stiffs hide our money from Mr Cameron, he sends some nice men from HMRC to your house with a nice letter that says "pay or go to jail". However when someone like Mr Cameron does it, he's hard done by.
Only the truly naive believe this. The fact is a lot of costs need to be paid and if not paid by the government end up being pushed onto you with a markup. The US health insurance system is a good demonstration of this. Despite all the flaws of the NHS, it's still cheaper than the US system and more effective for anyone except those earning above 150,000 pounds.
Erm... so paying for a domain and hosting for something I might use every 2 years is better.
Right.
Realistically GMail is fine. Any perspective employer is going to call you on your phone first, so a good phone manner is far more essential.
I liked the score better when it was in hex.
Pah, it was better when the scores were in the original Klingon.
No, their policy of making people take off their shoes is causing long lines.
Belts and jackets too.
I generally like to wear nice clothes when flying, I'm part of the old school who remembers when flying was expensive so people dressed up for it. However when flying domestically in the US I've resorted to T-shirts and shorts because if that belt comes off, so do my trousers.
Clinton has pissed in too many cereal bowls, made too many backroom deals. She's damaged goods...
I'm not an American, but you lot make it hard to ignore US politics so you're getting my 2 pence anyway...
You've demonstrated the biggest problem with US politics here and it's something you see a lot more from the Republican side than the Democrat side. The Republicans know they dont have a candidate with an actual chance. Trump is the most popular one and he hasn't got a chance in hell of being president so they've resorted to personal attacks in an attempt to poison the well. Its the same thing we've seen with Obama for the last 8 odd years, because they couldn't actually find a problem with Obama or the Democrat policies, they've had to resort to questioning his birth, religion, choice of pants, so on and so forth. So they're doing the same with Clinton (who realistically has the sanest economic policies) because they know that they're chances of winning means that they may as well start calling her Madam President right here and now.
When you go after the person, not the policies you're demonstrating that not only do you fail to find fault with their policies, but you also cant find any merit in your own.
Some countries have a complete black ban on political advertising for a week before the election, personally I think this is a good thing as when the shit slinging ceases, people cant talk about actual policies and maybe be a tiny bit informed about the potential repercussions.
This is your brain on Trump.
I'm surprised there wasn't more information about your brain on Cruz. Or maybe it scared the researchers a little too much.
For most people, the idea of president trump brings about sheer, unadulterated terror. For those that do not experience this, they've found to have very little brain reactions what so every.
So, how does this now play for Apple, who banked on their phones being secure as a selling point?
Yep, Apple screwed themselves hard here.
We've known for some time that Apple's security is largely a product of marketing over engineering with the fact that many times the phone has been jailbroken, as more than one point just by visiting a web site but here because they made such a huge spectacle over it, it cant be buried on the back page of some obscure specialist publication.
So Apple has won a pyrrhic victory but lost a lot more.
It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.
Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'
8.5% is pretty high. Daily intake of sugar should be around 70-100 grams maximum, depending on build, gender, age, so on and so forth. If you drink 1 x 500 ml glass of orange juice, you've just taken half your daily intake of sugar in one fell swoop.