Slashdot Mirror


Fruit Drinks Aren't Much Better For You Than Soda: Study (vox.com)

An anonymous reader cites a study on Vox: One of the biggest public health wins of recent decades has been America's slow shift away from soda. But there's pretty good evidence that Americans are still getting hoodwinked by juices and other sugary beverages. Data from Euromonitor, which analyzed U.S. retail beverage sales over the past five years, shows that while the soda category is shrinking, juice sales have held steady, and sales of energy and sports drinks have been growing. An article in BMJ Open demonstrates the extent of the problem: The researchers looked at how much of the American diet is composed of ultra-processed foods and added sugars. They found that 58 percent of total energy intake -- more than half of the calories Americans consume! -- came from foods that are packed with lots of flavors, colors, and sweeteners. And almost 90 percent of the added sugars Americans consume came from heavily processed foods -- the two main sources being soft drinks (17 percent) closely followed by fruit drinks (14 percent). (In this case, 'fruit drinks' refers to processed juices with added sugars.)

221 comments

  1. This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing and advertising only tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!!

    jeez, wake up will ya.

    1. Re:This Just In by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      The article is very fuzzy when distinguishing between juice and juice drinks. It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.

      I suppose soft drink vendors could turn this around and say "as healthy as fruit juice" as show by this study.

    2. Re:This Just In by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.

      Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'

    3. Re:This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what I was thinking. I'm picky about my juice, but when ever some one else buys me one, it is always something like 10% fruit juice and loaded with corn syrup. I'm not meaning to talk about the health effects of real sugar vs corn syrup here. It is the way it is made. The taste is a bit different, but more importantly, they have no pulp. The thickness of the drink is wrong.

      Yeah, fruits are high in sugar, but that doesn't mean I want even more sugar / corn syrup to make up for the bad flavor that corn syrup drink makers have to mitigate.

    4. Re:This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that's the very reason why such misunderstandings happen. Imagine what the original "Anti-Soda" study was, and how the original "Anti-Soda" media coverage was written. It's no surprise that some would misinterpret the article.

      While fuzzy, at least the information is in this article about heavily processed foods, but only if you read past the first half of the article.

      Snazzed-up Headlines: Americans are still getting hoodwinked by juices and other sugary beverages.
      Better Headline: Americans still aren't decreasing sugar consumption, even after switching to juices.

      Thoughts?

    5. Re:This Just In by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Not really - "And even pure fruit juices that deliver vitamins and nutrients — like freshly squeezed orange juice — also deliver a lot of calories and sugar" makes it clear that all juices are high in sugar. Just, sugar-water-based "fruit drinks" are criticized for having very little/no nutritional value.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:This Just In by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'

      Not only that, but it's pretty close to what most sodas are, and most juices are have similar numbers as well. It also doesn't take much juice (14 oz, even if it's "natural" or "organic" fruit juice to meet food religion requirements) to exceed the FDA recommendation for simple sugars per day, which is likely too high at this point.

      Overconsumption of simple sugars are likely *THE* reason why a lot of people have high cholesterol and fatty liver, and in a 2,000 calorie diet you should probably be consuming less than 20g but ideally zero (there's no nutritional or other physiological need for it.) Cutting out dietary cholesterol and saturated fat from your diet is and always has been the wrong advice for treating these.

    7. Re:This Just In by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, fruits are high in sugar, but that doesn't mean I want even more sugar / corn syrup to make up for the bad flavor that corn syrup drink makers have to mitigate.

      Fruits aren't necessarily high in sugar, but juicing typically keeps the sugar while removing a lot of other materials, making fruit juice have a higher concentration than fruit. The same applies to vegetables by the way, which is why "juicing" or "juice diets" are a pretty dumb idea if the whole point is to be healthier.

    8. Re:This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in EU it's illegal to call something "juice" if it doesn't have 100% fruit content - the only additive that "juice" can have in EU is water or it must be called "fruit drink" or "nectar".

    9. Re:This Just In by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The story here on /. is not any better. This whole thing almost reads like a fuzzy religious argument, not a fact-based one.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:This Just In by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'

      Orange juice has less than half the calories from sugar as most sodas. 28 gm vs 72 gm per liter.

      Also, "fruit drink" and "fruit juice" are totally different things. The former is basically soda without the carbonation. It is amazing how many people don't understand the difference. My wife bought "fruit drink" several times (because it was cheaper), and only stopped when I made her watch me pour it into the toilet.

    11. Re:This Just In by jshackney · · Score: 1

      Similar in the U.S.

      Beverages that are 100% juice may be called “juice.” However, beverages that are diluted to less than 100% juice must have the word “juice” qualified with a term such as “beverage,” “drink,” or “cocktail.” Alternatively, the product may be labeled with a name using the form “diluted ____ juice,”

      Other rules applies for blends and %-based mixes.

    12. Re:This Just In by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Yeah, fruits are high in sugar, but that doesn't mean I want even more sugar / corn syrup to make up for the bad flavor that corn syrup drink makers have to mitigate.

      Fruits aren't necessarily high in sugar, but juicing typically keeps the sugar while removing a lot of other materials, making fruit juice have a higher concentration than fruit. The same applies to vegetables by the way, which is why "juicing" or "juice diets" are a pretty dumb idea if the whole point is to be healthier.

      A lot of the "other material" is the fiber from the whole fruit, which slows the digestion of the sugars/carbs. Furthermore, a cup of orange juice contains the juice of several oranges, which would be difficult to consume from whole fruit in one sitting.

      You might be interested in this (90min) video, Sugar: The Bitter Truth by Robert H. Lustig, MD, UCSF Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology, in which he explores the damage caused by sugary foods. He argues that fructose (too much) and fiber (not enough) appear to be cornerstones of the obesity epidemic through their effects on insulin. The video also describes, in detail, how different types of sugar are metabolized by the body - for example: glucose, entire body; fructose, only by the liver - like alcohol, but with detrimental differences.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    13. Re:This Just In by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Do you have a place to read up on the link between fatty liver, cholesterol, and simple sugar? Since complex carbs break down so quickly what's the real difference?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    14. Re:This Just In by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you care about health and ingredients you have to really learn the vocabulary of food marketing in order to understand what the different things being discussed are.

      "Fruit drink" and "soda" are both words for Earth Sugardrink. "Fruit Juice" is not a "Fruit drink." They try really hard to conflate this, but they are simply different products.

      We already knew that adding juice to Earth Sugardrink didn't magically make it healthy; Mt Dew contains orange juice, Dr Pepper contains prune juice, etc.

    15. Re:This Just In by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Research consistently shows that processed mono-sugars are harmful in ways that fruit isn't, even where the total sugar content in the fruit is the same.

      And yet, if you process the fruit to extract mono-sugars, they are just as bad as any other mono-sugar, in some cases they're in the worst group.

      So it makes no sense to just measure total sugar and presume it is harmful. What appears to matter a lot more for health is added sugar and highly processed foods generally.

      Just like white flour is harmful because of the mono-carbs, but whole grain isn't.

    16. Re:This Just In by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Problem is orange juice is bad for you.... Would you EAT 6 oranges? no. but you will happily drink 6 oranges.

      The problem also stems from the fact that americans wont drink a 4oz glass of OJ.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:This Just In by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The culprit is fructose, not simple sugar. Simple sugar is dextrose (glucose), and can be digested and used by every cell in the body. Fructose is digested in the liver and doing so burns through ATP like there's no tomorrow. Fructose digestion is amazingly similar to alcohol digestion, you just don't get the buzz you do with alcohol.

      Table sugar (sucrose) is no better because it's half fructose.

      Watch the video at youtube
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

    18. Re:This Just In by grumling · · Score: 1

      But they also won't drink a 64 oz glass of OJ either, but a soft drink that size is available at any US gas station.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    19. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 1

      IT is not just processed, it is ultra processed. Ultra processed sucrose, otherwise chemically identical to unprocessed, is 10x worse that natural sucrose!

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    20. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 2

      OJ has more sugar in it that coke. At least if you believe the label. Is is "bad" for you. Well everything is so fuck it. I will enjoy my life and not be stuck with boring food for a life time. There isn't even any evidence that you live longer with these "healthy organic(WTF does that even mean) natural diet" ...Probably feels like it however.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    21. Re:This Just In by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think there's a problem with so called sports drinks, which are just sugar water with some other ingredients. Power-Ade for instance. Parents probably thinking it's ok for the kids.

    22. Re:This Just In by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't part of the issue be the type of sugar as well? I mean sugars are, like fats, an entire subcategory of complex hydrocarbons. So to compare percentages alone is far too simplistic.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    23. Re:This Just In by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      You don't get nearly that much in the cup after you fill it with ice.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    24. Re:This Just In by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You're preaching to the choir. I had really high blood cholesterol, high triglycerides, non-alcoholic fatty liver, and was diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. I was following the advice given (and still given until 2 months ago) to avoid foods high in dietary cholesterol and saturated fats. I went on like that for years and it didn't do shit, and I was told that diet can only adjust your cholesterol numbers by about 30%, and it's likely that I was genetically predisposed to have high cholesterol and needed statin drugs.

      This was odd though because nobody else in my family had any of these problems, including the more overweight members. Also this situation couldn't last because apparently my liver was being distressed by the lovastatin (my liver enzymes went up so they took me off of it temporarily.)

      So I went and did my own research and found that not only was the connection to dietary cholesterol very weak at best, but the research method that recommendation was based on was flawed. I then found some further information that explained the exact metabolic process with which simple sugars get converted into solid fats (for fatty liver), triglycerides, and cholesterol. After that I simply dropped simple sugars from my diet completely, (except for the occasional fruit in a day or candy bar in a week) which mostly just meant no more soda and no more juice. Lo and behold, ALL of those symptoms went away, and furthermore I'm no longer on statins either.

      I still drink diet soda though, and it doesn't cause any issues. I haven't found any credible research that shows anything bad about aspartame, which is just a combination of two amino acids (aspartic acid, phenylalinine) and methanol, all of which are found in higher quantities in "natural" foods than are found in diet sodas (fruit juice has something like 11 times as much methanol and 6 times as much aspartic acid as a diet soda, while milk has some 6 times as much phenylalinine.)

    25. Re:This Just In by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Yep. Fruit is just nature's candy bar. I remember listening to a piece on NPR in which a doctor who works with migrant laborers blames government OJ for making their kids fat.

    26. Re:This Just In by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      In addition to the Robert Lustig video you linked, I would also suggest Gary Taubes's "Why We Get Fat", and Peter Attia's "Straight Dope On Cholesterol". These three together provide an excellent understanding of the big picture.

      As you noted, Lustig's "Sugar: The Bitter Truth" highlights the link from fructose to metabolic syndrome and fatty liver disease. Taubes's lecture (and book of the same name) covers the link from carbohydrates in general to insulin resistance and obesity. Dr. Attia covers the nitty-gritty details of how cholesterol is produced in the body and absorbed from dietary intake. (Over 90% of serum cholesterol is produced by the body itself, only a tiny fraction comes from the food you eat.)

      I would also suggest doing some research on Low-Carb / High-Fat diets (just google "LCHF") and ketogenesis.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    27. Re:This Just In by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I still drink diet soda though, and it doesn't cause any issues. I haven't found any credible research that shows anything bad about aspartame, which is just a combination of two amino acids (aspartic acid, phenylalinine) and methanol, all of which are found in higher quantities in "natural" foods than are found in diet sodas (fruit juice has something like 11 times as much methanol and 6 times as much aspartic acid as a diet soda, while milk has some 6 times as much phenylalinine.)

      It's not the aspartame that's the issue....
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      http://directorsblog.nih.gov/2...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    28. Re:This Just In by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      We all understand that "processed" foods have lost some of their original nutrients. But there's no standard for how much of those are lost, or what "processed" even actually means. If processed foods have no nutrients, do "ultra processed" foods suck the nutrients out of you?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    29. Re:This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a 2,000 calorie diet you should probably be consuming less than 20g [of sugar] but ideally zero

      By the way, a single 2 dl glass of orange juice / fruit drink / fizzy drink contains that 20 grams of sugar.

      Orange juice may not be the best thing to include in a breakfast after all.

    30. Re:This Just In by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.

      Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'

      Did you ever research "Natural Flavors" when used with Juices? Your pure Orange juice is really not very pure. Natural flavours is one reason why I consume washed unprocessed "raw" fruits eg, Oranges

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    31. Re:This Just In by mjwx · · Score: 1

      It seems to claim 'orange juice' is very high in sugar, but then implies it means orange juice with added sugar, not pure OJ.

      Pure orange juice has about 8.5% of sugar and about 2% of other carbohydrates. That could be called 'very high'

      8.5% is pretty high. Daily intake of sugar should be around 70-100 grams maximum, depending on build, gender, age, so on and so forth. If you drink 1 x 500 ml glass of orange juice, you've just taken half your daily intake of sugar in one fell swoop.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    32. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Clearly ultra processed foods don't just suck nutrients out of you, they give you cancer, heart attacks and strokes. At the same time! Watch out for the most evil of ultra processed ingredients used in the food industry. Ultra processed water. That shit will kill you.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    33. Re:This Just In by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      OJ has more sugar in it that coke. At least if you believe the label. Is is "bad" for you. Well everything is so fuck it. I will enjoy my life and not be stuck with boring food for a life time. There isn't even any evidence that you live longer with these "healthy organic(WTF does that even mean) natural diet" ...Probably feels like it however.

      Organic has a very specific legal definition and can be found easily with a simple search.

    34. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    35. Re:This Just In by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. Stop being lazy. https://www.ams.usda.gov/about...

    36. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahah HAHAHAHAHAHAH *HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH*. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      It really doesn't. For example people think organic is no pesticides. But you can use "organic" pesticides. What pesticides are organic depends on state and country. And if you bothered to even read the regulations, exceptions and well anything. You would know. Organic is a label to charge more for "feel goods". But you didn't and you won't cus your the type of class A sucker they sell this shit too.

      Sucker and his money.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    37. Re:This Just In by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't. For example people think organic is no pesticides. But you can use "organic" pesticides. What pesticides are organic depends on state and country. And if you bothered to even read the regulations, exceptions and well anything. You would know. Organic is a label to charge more for "feel goods". But you didn't and you won't cus your the type of class A sucker they sell this shit too.

      Regardless of your dislike for the definition or your other blatherings, it DOES have a specific definition.

    38. Re:This Just In by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Did you even read your own link? You didn't did you.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  2. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't tell the whole foods crowd.

  3. Sugar is sugar... by Thagg · · Score: 1

    It's so easy to justify consuming almost anything, because there are thousands of web pages that say "that is good for you!" Coffee, chocolate, fruit juice, whatever. Some of these are, of course, created by the companies that sell these foods and drinks -- but I think most of it comes from the fact that everybody eats -- and while almost any other subject will only address a fraction of people, foods and drinks are obviously part of everybody's life. So, there's talk about food every day in the newspaper, on the news cable channels...and now on Slashdot.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's so easy to justify consuming almost anything, because there are thousands of web pages that say "that is good for you!"

      The old standby that almost everything we eat is 'good for you' in limited quantities. A pack of cards sized steak is good for you, a couple times a week. Same with fish, chicken, coffee, wine, etc...

      The problem is when you're having 24oz of soda with every meal.

      Personally, from what I've read fruit drinks are basically only lacking carbonation to be a 'soda'. Even fruit drinks aren't as good as, well, eating the fruit involved because there's lots of nutrients you're losing out on that was in the pulp of the fruit, and besides, the pulp has carbs and fiber that help you feel 'full', which the juice alone will shoot through your system and not satiate you.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not web sites that conned the masses into juicing, it's the product manufacturers, their massive ad campaign and the celebs endorsing them (while failing to admit they don't do it themselves and have person trainers and nutritionists).

      Nutritionists have been saying juice and the juicer fad are bad for us for over a decade - because of the massive amount of sugar ingested sans fibre. But who wants to listen to them when they can get paid to push $500 masticating and centrifugal machines?

      The truth has been available, but no one wants to hear it.

    3. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, sugar is sugar but...

      Just go into any American Supermarket and look at the ingredients of the things that you put in your basket.
      How many have lots of 'High Fructose Corn Syrup'?
      You don't need all that sugar. IT is used to mask the crap/cheap ingredients the food processors use.

      In some markets it is almost impossible to buy bread that does not contain the evil syrup. I bake my own bread and the amount of sugar (Honey) I add to it is tiny when compared to supermarket bread.
      I don't have any other sugar in my home. You don't need it.

    4. Re:Sugar is sugar... by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I use fruit juice and seltzer water to replace soda in my diet. Less sugar, the seltzer water is cheaper than buying water. The mix is usually 60% juice.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    5. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just mix 60% soda and 40% seltzer water. You can still enjoy the soda and it will be just as good for you as what you're doing.

    6. Re:Sugar is sugar... by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

      or even, just water.

      yes, like they put in toilets, it won't kill you honest.*

      *residents of flynt michigan not included

    7. Re:Sugar is sugar... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even fruit drinks aren't as good as, well, eating the fruit involved because there's lots of nutrients you're losing out on that was in the pulp of the fruit, and besides, the pulp has carbs and fiber that help you feel 'full', which the juice alone will shoot through your system and not satiate you.

      Well also they're talking about fruit drinks, not fruit juice. Whenever you see something labelled "fruit drink", it should trigger alarm bells and the question, "why aren't they calling it juice?"

      Even things labelled "juice" sometimes have additives, including additional sugar. When it's labelled a "fruit drink", it means that they've doctored it so much and added so much sugar that they're not allowed to call it "juice" anymore. It's sort of like if you go to a mexican restaurant and the stuff they put in the tacos is referred to as something like, "beef-based taco filling." That should immediately make you question what that stuff is.

    8. Re:Sugar is sugar... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Even fruit drinks aren't as good as, well, eating the fruit involved because there's lots of nutrients you're losing out on that was in the pulp of the fruit, and besides, the pulp has carbs and fiber that help you feel 'full', which the juice alone will shoot through your system and not satiate you.

      Also, the time taken to digest the cell walls and release their contents delays and spreads out the release of the sugar from whole fruit, whereas with juice the sugar hits your bloodstream in one spike.

    9. Re:Sugar is sugar... by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I do something similar, except I just cut the soda pop with whisky so I'm not getting as much of it, but a 60% mix seems a bit high.

    10. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is flynt, MI. never heard of it.

    11. Re:Sugar is sugar... by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

      the place with the lead water, whatever it's called.

    12. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News at 11. Fruit contains sugar, so do fizzy drinks.

    13. Re:Sugar is sugar... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Hmm, water that will replenish the fillings in your teeth... Seriously, in African countries, lead pipes were removed about 100 years ago already. WTF is wrong with America?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    14. Re:Sugar is sugar... by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I was an avid water drinker, until I moved to this village. The water is very high in manganese and tastes like chemicals. I can't stand the plastic taste of bottled water or the price. The seltzer has the plastic taste but the fruit juice covers it. When I move somewhere there is real water I will probably drink mostly water again.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    15. Re:Sugar is sugar... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Yes, what you say is true. But even fruit juice is often not that great for you. In particular, things labeled 100% juice are frequently a blend of the sweetest possible juices (appl, grape, pear, etc) maybe combined with some amount of the main juice you think you're buying. For example, those "premium" juice blends sold in the refrigerated section if a grocery store may have kale and whatever juices, but they frequently are blended with the sweetest juices to make the "palatable.". You're just drinking a sugary beverage often then, not some wondrous " healthy" vegetable cocktail with kale, etc.

    16. Re:Sugar is sugar... by sudon't · · Score: 2

      I think most of it comes from the fact that everybody eats -- and while almost any other subject will only address a fraction of people, foods and drinks are obviously part of everybody's life. So, there's talk about food every day in the newspaper, on the news cable channels...and now on Slashdot.

      Trust me, people weren't always so obsessed with food as medicine as they are today. Another thing I can tell you as an older person: These "studies" that refute previous common wisdom come and go with some regularity. First we hear that "food X" is bad for you. Later, that "food X" is good for you. Live long enough, and you'll see it go back and forth a few times. Just eat food, people. You'll be fine. Whether it's drugs, alcohol, soda pop, or whatever - moderation is the key.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    17. Re:Sugar is sugar... by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Seriously, in African countries, lead pipes were removed about 100 years ago already. WTF is wrong with America?

      The danger from lead pipes can be managed. Lead doesn't dissolve well in water and chemicals can be used to reduce this further. The Flint water was safe until the source was switched to water that was acidic which greatly increased the lead in solution.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    18. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be that as it may, something like pure apple juice with no additives has a sugar composition that meets or exceeds most major sodas.

    19. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      "WTF is wrong with America?"

      Republican Leadership.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:Sugar is sugar... by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 0

      "WTF is wrong with America?"

      Republican Leadership.

      Don't forget the pure and undying hatred of the American people for anything "sciencey."

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    21. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the place with the lead water, whatever it's called.

      "I would be a genius if i weren't for all the lead based paint I ate as a kid." - Jim Gafigan.

    22. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Well also they're talking about fruit drinks, not fruit juice. Whenever you see something labelled "fruit drink", it should trigger alarm bells and the question, "why aren't they calling it juice?"

      It holds true even for many fruit juices. Consider apple juice, at 14 calories per ounce, matches my 12 ounce root beer can. 168 calories for the juice, 170(mandatory FDA rounding) for the root beer. Now yes, it does have less sugar(36 vs 35). Orange Juice has the same number of calories - but less sugar still, and actually has some protein.

      I maintain that eating fruit is normally better than drinking just the juice.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    23. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      Just wait, they will pass laws against science soon... Thinking and learning will be considered crimes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:Sugar is sugar... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I maintain that eating fruit is normally better than drinking just the juice.

      I don't think that's in dispute. My point was that as critical as you might want to be about the healthiness of fruit juices, there's likely to be even more reason to be critical of fruit "drinks".

    25. Re:Sugar is sugar... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Sugar just ain't sugar. Sugar is the volume of food required to eat to create an energy surcharge, an excess that leads to fat deposition. So it is down to energy density, quite simple how much of that crap you can shove down your gullet to feed your craving belly and how addicted various chemicals are, like MSG. Obviously if if simply takes up more space you will not be able to eat as much. So food energy density laws, not just how much sugar but the volume of food containing that sugar, plus of course say a requirement for more health promoting chemicals required to be added into that volume of crap. I make bread too and honey, butter and cinnamon with natural extended fermentation do make for a really tasty loaf, almost too tasty, thick cut toast, oh wow.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    26. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      And if its called "drank", well, hmm...

    27. Re:Sugar is sugar... by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      Even fruit drinks aren't as good as, well, eating the fruit involved because there's lots of nutrients you're losing out on that was in the pulp of the fruit, and besides, the pulp has carbs and fiber that help you feel 'full', which the juice alone will shoot through your system and not satiate you.

      Well also they're talking about fruit drinks, not fruit juice. Whenever you see something labelled "fruit drink", it should trigger alarm bells and the question, "why aren't they calling it juice?"

      Even things labelled "juice" sometimes have additives, including additional sugar. When it's labelled a "fruit drink", it means that they've doctored it so much and added so much sugar that they're not allowed to call it "juice" anymore. It's sort of like if you go to a mexican restaurant and the stuff they put in the tacos is referred to as something like, "beef-based taco filling." That should immediately make you question what that stuff is.

      Actually, if a beverage is labeled as juice or to contain juice then the juice content must be displayed somewhere on the label ( 21 CFR 101.30(a). If a beverage is labeled as a fruit drink you can bet it has very little to no fruit juice.

    28. Re:Sugar is sugar... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Fully agree, both on the fact that the pure cases are already not that recommendable, and on top of that we're moving towards sweeter.
      I found that grapefruit juice has shifted away towards 'red grapefruit' as well as towards nectars, and since recently some supermarkets don't even sell the plain yellow grapefruit anymore round here.

    29. Re:Sugar is sugar... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Flint is run by Democrats.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    30. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's good for you often describes something where the body has had thousands of years to adapt itself to the substance, mutate if necessary, and asimilate it without serious negative results. So, a certain amout of sugar the human can tolerate, but the added sugar (only for a few centuries we've had the refined white powder) is only in our recent history, and the body handles it badly.

    31. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink Naked Juice smoothie mixed with Welch's grape juice (no sugar added). It's pretty healthy... lots of antioxidants.

    32. Re:Sugar is sugar... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You seem to be one of the most retarded people on the planet....

      Let me correct you.

      The republican governor who appointed a republican emergency coordinator that caused the whole mess by switching away fo m the Detroit water system to their old failing river system to save money.

      Next time actually have some level of education on the subject, it makes you look less stupid.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    33. Re:Sugar is sugar... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Not recently. Flint was put under state control, which in Michigan right now means Republicans. The Flint city government had no power to stop the Republicans from poisoning the city.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    34. Re:Sugar is sugar... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I guess anyone who doesn't agree with your meme must be "retarded". Sure Snyder deserves some blame, but not the politically spun bullshit being weaved by the left. From politifact....

      While local elected officials in Flint were subservient to Snyder’s emergency managers, those local officials concurred with the initial decisions to switch away from the old water source and to use the Flint River as an interim source.

      Two months after the Flint River switch, Flint Mayor Dayne Walling declared to MLive.com that ‘it’s a quality, safe product. I think people are wasting their precious money buying bottled water.

      Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency -- during the administration of President Barack Obama -- has come in for criticism as well. A July 2015 email by a regional EPA administrator apologized for the warnings by the EPA’s own employee, Del Toral, and called them an "unvetted draft." Despite senior EPA officials’ delays in taking Del Toral’s warnings seriously, they were ultimately determined to have been accurate.

      Several experts added that the problems in Flint cannot be divorced from the city’s long-term economic decline. And as long ago as 2010, the EPA expressed concern that "dramatic budget cuts" at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality were having a "significant impact" on its water program. The governor at the time? Democrat Jennifer Granholm.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    35. Re:Sugar is sugar... by dcw3 · · Score: 1
      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  4. Fruit drinks are bad... by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Informative
    Fruit drinks are a bit deceptive if you're not a label reader, but even less well publicized is the fact that many fruit juices are nearly as bad for you when stripped of the fiber present naturally in the fruit itself.

    How you get too much sugar is basically irrelevant.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Lol, the fiber myth keeps rearing it's ugly head. Tell me how eating 1 apple is and better for you than eating 1 apple worth of apple juice. They both have exactly the same amount of sugar. Are you telling me that if I put 1 apple worth of fiber in my 1 apple worth of apple juice, it suddenly makes it healthy? Fiber which is an undigestible substance that has no nutritional value and somehow magically makes sugar more healthy.

    2. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Eating doesn't stop in the stomach, what happens after the stomach is likely very important i.e. absorbing the stuff.
      It's possible that nutrients like vitamins and stuff are easily more absorbed if there's fiber and stuff to slow them down, else your body could opportunistically absorb the sugar and let the rest go down the crapper. Although it should be very unlikely that you're deficient in vitamins (or proteins)

      Apple juice? I can't stop at one glass, if I have apple juice I'll likely drink half a liter :)
      Easy to stop at one apple, and one glass of water.

    3. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      As advanced as we imagine we are, new discoveries occur almost daily.

      Shades of betacarotene, there are new things added to our vitamins all the time.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fiber and other stuff in the real apple slow down the absorption of the sugar from the apple by the body, so no blood sugar spike.

      The apple juice, with none of the "good stuff", gets absorbed very quickly and results in a sugar spike.

      The other, somewhat more significant problem, is that nobody drinks 1 apple worth of juice a day, you simply don't get very much juice per apple. The result is that you are drinking say 4 or more apples worth of juice, with the resulting increase in sugar, and without the fiber and other things your body doesn't feel full. So you still want to eat yet more food, with yet more calories and possibly more sugar.

    5. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yes, for example if you take processed sugar and mix it with oat bran, that will cause less harm than if you just eat straight sugar.

      BTW, there are 2 types of fiber in food, and they are very different. A statement like "Fiber which is an undigestible substance that has no nutritional value" is complete idiocy. Fiber not only has nutritional value, it is necessary for good health.

      Read a little bit about how excess sugar consumption causes diabetes. You might discover that eating straight sugar all at once is much more harmful to your body than eating the same amount a little bit at a time mixed with fiber.

    6. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Yes, for example if you take processed sugar and mix it with oat bran, that will cause less harm than if you just eat straight sugar.

      BTW, there are 2 types of fiber in food, and they are very different. A statement like "Fiber which is an undigestible substance that has no nutritional value" is complete idiocy.

      Yes, there are soluble and insoluble forms of dietary fiber, both of which are indigestible. Care to try again?

      Fiber not only has nutritional value, it is necessary for good health.

      Read a little bit about how excess sugar consumption causes diabetes. You might discover that eating straight sugar all at once is much more harmful to your body than eating the same amount a little bit at a time mixed with fiber.

      OK genius. What is the nutritional value of 1 gram of soluble fiber, and 1 gram of insoluble fiber.

    7. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Go. Look. It. Up. And. Find. Out.

      I'll give you a hint, one isn't digested; the other is.

      Don't even use the word "genius," you are not even a functional reader. To prove you can read, don't write; go and read. Then, when you don't reply I'll know you actually read something about the subject.

      Since you didn't know how to google:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
      http://www.mayoclinic.org/heal...

      You also seem confused about the word "nutrient" (in nutritional) so I'll also show you:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Even fiber that isn't fermented and absorbed is still a nutrient, it still has nutritional value.

    8. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      So which of your links says that fiber is digestible? Sure, fiber has nutritional value for animals that are capable of digesting cellulose. So technically yes it has nutritional value when you eat it, and it still has the same nutritional value after you shit it out. All of those articles say that fiber "may" have all sorts of benefits. We highly subsidize agriculture in this country, so it's important to get consumers to eat lots of agricultural products that are bad for us. Most of these contain fiber, which is useless as a food.

    9. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, what drinks are good? Just water? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, the fiber myth keeps rearing it's ugly head. Tell me how eating 1 apple is and better for you than eating 1 apple worth of apple juice. They both have exactly the same amount of sugar. Are you telling me that if I put 1 apple worth of fiber in my 1 apple worth of apple juice, it suddenly makes it healthy? Fiber which is an undigestible substance that has no nutritional value and somehow magically makes sugar more healthy.

      You will see where getting enough fiber in your diet is important when you take a dump and it is either like passing so many rocks or you have so much diarrhea that it dehydrates you. Fiber is important in the proper amount.

      Sugar, not so much. The human body has 0 need for dietary sugar of any kind. This is a fact. Carbohydrates are a non-essential nutrient unlike protein and fats.

    11. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      So which of your links says that fiber is digestible?

      First link, first paragraph. Readers can read.

    12. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      First paragraph says:

      Dietary fiber or roughage is the indigestible portion of food derived from plants. It has two main components:

      Yes. Readers can read.

    13. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You can't read. Learn to read, then try again at writing. Did you check the link where it explained that it doesn't have to be digestible to be a nutrient, and to have nutritional value?

      read words before writing replies

      You're getting pedantic about something where you don't know the details, and the details don't support your position.

      It literally lists fiber on the nutrient page I linked above. But you can't read, do you don't know that.

      Futhermore, you ended your quote before the end of the paragraph. Notice the colon at the end of what you quoted? That means the words after that are connected, and important. And it goes on to say, "Soluble fiber, which dissolves in water, is readily fermented in the colon into gases and physiologically active byproducts," but you can't read so you didn't know.

    14. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      First, I want you to quote me the passage that says that any type of dietary fiber is digestible. Then I would like to know the nutritional value of that fiber as digested I am going to be waiting for quite some time, because none of your links contain that information.

    15. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      And here is the quote from your Nutrient page:

      Non-essential nutrients[edit]

      Non-essential nutrients are substances within foods can still have a significant impact on health, whether beneficial or toxic. For example, most dietary fiber is not absorbed by the human digestive tract, but is important in maintaining the bulk of a bowel movement to avoid constipation.

    16. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Drinking water has been the hydration choice of earthly life forms for some time now, but there are various and sundry studies which purport to prove the health benefits of tea, coffee, and wine.

      You simply cannot do everything right, because what's good for you seems to be an evolving position. Not surprisingly, what is healthy for you is not necessarily longevity promoting in everyone else.

      Centagenarians most often report happiness as the common thread, so don't deny yourself a pleasurable treat once in a while.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    17. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      R E A D

    18. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, and if you could read, then that passage would tell you that fiber is a nutrient. But, you can't.

    19. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      So now we have gone from fiber is digestible and has nutritional value, to fiber is a non essential nutrient that cannot be digested and has no nutritional value. Great. I'm glad you could admit that.

    20. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beans beans
      They're good for your heart
      The more you eat the more you fart
      The more you fart the better you feel
      So let's have beans with every meal

      Thank for pointing me at those links.

    21. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      R E A D.

    22. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Lol, the fiber myth keeps rearing it's ugly head.

      Ask anyone who (like myself) suffers from IBS...fiber keeps you regular. Fiber also makes you feel full, thus helping keep people from overeating. This article from NIH has links to several other good sources on why fiber is important.

      https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlin...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    23. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Most of these contain fiber, which is useless as a food.

      Not so fast...
      http://www.mayoclinic.org/fibe...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    24. Re:Fruit drinks are bad... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Also from the American Heart Association...

      Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet, may help improve blood cholesterol levels, and lower risk of heart disease, stroke, obesity and type 2 diabetes.
      Dietary fiber can make you feel full, so you may eat fewer calories. Including whole grains in your diet plan may help you reach or manage a healthy weight.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    25. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I had a co worker who had IBS. He would eat lunch and 15 minutes later would be in the bathroom with diarrhea. That was until he went to a low carbohydrate diet, that included almost no fiber whatsoever. He suddenly became regular, and his chronic heartburn disappeared as well. Fiber doesnt make you feel full. Thats like saying eating newspaper makes you feel full. The carbohydrates that always go along with it (except for in the case of most vegetables) are what make you hungry after your blood sugar levels drop and the coincident insulin response. If you want to feel satisfied and not hungry, leafy greens and a good piece of fatty protein is the way to go. Or perhaps some nuts and cheese. I am speaking from experience after trying the whole grains and fruit is good for you thing for years. I eliminated most grains from my diet and dropped 60 pounds and am the healthiest I have ever been.

    26. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      B R A I N S

    27. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Drink a glass of Metamucil, or a wafer, and tell me again that fiber doesn't make you feel full. The American Heart Association (I provided a link elsewhere) agrees. Your anecdotal "speaking from experience" doesn't compare. I could easily do the same, after suffering from IBS for over 30 years. Got any science to back up your claims....no, I didn't think so.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    28. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Metamucil gives me trouble stomach cramps. The American heart association is wrong like it is with so many other things.

    29. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the National Institutes of Health is as well, right?
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm...
      https://newsinhealth.nih.gov/i...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    30. Re: Fruit drinks are bad... by Bartles · · Score: 1
  5. Healthy != Profitable by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only the Food Industry could make fruit unhealthy.

    1. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What nonsense do you try to speak?

      Fruit isn't THAT healthy for you when it is refined in to only juice.
      The juice is almost pure sugar and acids that rot the shit out of your teeth.
      We only just started to eat fruit fairly "recently" in massive numbers because of the overall benefits, but that doesn't make it healthy, it just makes it useful.

      The only good fruit juice is one blended with the entire fruit and halved in density with extra water. (preferably in ice form for a fruit slush)
      Throw some veg in there on top and it is even better.

    2. Re:Healthy != Profitable by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Fresh home-juiced fruit isn't much better.

    3. Re:Healthy != Profitable by OpinOnion · · Score: 1

      Nope, not this time. People have been making fruit unhealthy since hominids found patches of fruited and pigged out on them .. as well as enjoyed the fermenting ones for their mysterious and magic properties. From wine to fruit juices throughout the ages. We've had the technology to mass produce juice, just not so cheap that the peons could have it. Now that they do, just as the aristocrats likely predicted, they can't handle the responsibility. We've certainly produce alcohol for millennium now and that's hard to sell as healthy, particularly when it's all you drink because of the evil water spirits.

    4. Re:Healthy != Profitable by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. While it still contains sugar the article is talking about ADDED sugar. So unless you fresh press your own juice and than add a teaspoon into every glass you drink fresh pressing your own juice is far healthier.

    5. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't go there, you will unleash a shitfest of replies attacking you because "fruit is totally health, I heard it on my TVs!".
      Yes, sadly even on Slashdot.

      Fruit isn't really that good for you in general. It has SOME useful benefits, but mostly it isn't that great.
      Especially the acidic fruits. If you have gastro problems, avoid them 100%, watch your need for medication drop to nothing. (did with me)
      Their only use should be as a source if nutrients for other foods. Yes, that thing called refined foods.
      Vitamins are honestly a better source of nutrients than the majority of fruit are.
      The only other benefit is the skins and flesh, which you should eat. Damn those are good.
      The fibre can be gained in considerably better and cheaper places.

      Most countries with the best health on the planet universally do not eat much fruit at all. (I'm pretty sure even government level food agencies tell people to LIMIT themselves to 1-2 fruit a day, in fact. B-B-B-BUT MY 5-A-DAY! Bullshit)
      It is veg and grain heavy, with some protein sources layered in about. (be it fish, soy, meats or eggs, some nuts)

      FYI, I am actually a hypocrite when I state all this since I tend to eat fruit about 3-4 times a day, sometimes more when I just have a fruit salad as a snack or whole meal.
      So much for the acidity problems of my gut. Oh well, time to go shove some fruit down my throat.
      Time for some pineapple and honey chicken.

    6. Re:Healthy != Profitable by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      While it still contains sugar the article is talking about ADDED sugar.

      The article is also talking about pure juice.

      So unless you fresh press your own juice and than add a teaspoon into every glass you drink fresh pressing your own juice is far healthier.

      Freshly pressed orange juice still has the same amount of sugar as regular cola.

    7. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Fruit · · Score: 2

      Only the Food Industry could make fruit unhealthy.

      :(

    8. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it also has fibers, which help digest the sugar.

    9. Re:Healthy != Profitable by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      But it also has fibers, which help digest the sugar

      While fibers are healthy, it's not because they help digest the sugar. The body can digest sugar just fine, and that's the bad part, actually. Fibers are good because they slow down digestion, they retain moisture, and they feed the intestinal bacteria.

    10. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss. Off.

      It barely has any of the fibers in it. AT ALL.

      The only way you will get those fibers is if you blend the entire fruit, not just the juice itself.

    11. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The food industry caters to demand. People want fruit juice, so the food industry provides it.

      You don't have to drink it. You could just eat a banana. The food industry provides those, too.

    12. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, still not even then. When you juice something the sugar is 'freed', will be absorbed very quickly, and then spikes your blood sugar levels (causing too much to be stored as fat then you have low blood sugar and reach for another snack). You want to eat it 'trapped' within the fiber so your digestion system needs to do a little work to get it and thus it enters your blood stream at a slower rate and for a longer period of time keeping you energized, but not enough so to trigger the sugar to fat response.

    13. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Fruit isn't that healthy for you in the form of fruit either.

    14. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Bartles · · Score: 1

      How does sugar get trapped in fiber? Please tell me.

    15. Re:Healthy != Profitable by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Freshly pressed orange juice still has the same amount of sugar as regular cola.

      And? There's a very big difference between natural sugars, refined sugars and the all American favourite HFCS.

      There's even more of a difference in what it is you eat with the sugars and how your body processes the mix i.e. a teaspoon of raw sugar, not as good for you and definitely lacking the nutritional value of eating a whole orange, even though the latter contains more sugar.

    16. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the Food Industry could make fruit unhealthy.

      :(

      Relax! He's not talking about you!

    17. Re: Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought it was drinks. ie soda without carbonation.

    18. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Only the Food Industry could make fruit unhealthy.

      Many, many of the juice drinks are prominently labelled with phrases like "contains 3% juice" or "contains no actual juice".
      They are just selling crap that has nothing to do with fruit and label it as such. Not "making fruit unhealthy".

    19. Re:Healthy != Profitable by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Depends. If you have say 8 ounces, that's fine. About what you'd get if you ate an apple or orange. People don't do that. They substitute it for water, what they should be drinking. So they'll have 24, 32, I've seen a big guy chug down 64 oz of fruit juice, then go back for more. He won't be around a whole lot longer.

      (Not necessarily to you, others reading this)
      Eat like a mother that was born 70+ years ago would have told you to eat. Lot of water. Eat some fruit. If you have OJ, have it in a juice glass, not a water type glass. Eat food with one ingredient (what they tell you in a fat loss doctor's class)- pork, beef, chicken, fish, a potato. Not pork with 8 ounces of BBQ sauce, potatoes that have a bunch of stuff on it... And so on. Sugar doesn't count. Don't think you can just down a lot of sugar.

    20. Re:Healthy != Profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And? There's a very big difference between natural sugars, refined sugars and the all American favourite HFCS.

      No, there's not much difference at all. I'd be interested in seeing any evidence to the contrary.

  6. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sugar is sugar is sugar. If you want fruit, eat an actual piece of fruit and get the benefits of the other raw and whole nutrients it contains. It's never a great idea to drink your calories.

    1. Re:Nope by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      It's never a great idea to drink your calories.

      ...except maybe when you're actually exercising. A 24 oz bottle of Gatorade has 160 calories in it, which would only take 10-15 minutes to burn off while running or cycling.

      Overconsumption of sugar is a big problem, but there's also lack of exercise. We've structured our lives (and cities) in such a way that we don't have to lift a finger to do anything. The only way to exercise is to actively go out of your way to do it; people just can't burn off all that sugar in their day-to-day suburban lives.

    2. Re:Nope by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Even then if you are exercising a lot you can simply eat big portions and fatty foods. Goes well with a typical diet that has too much starch/bread/pasta/rice/potato.

      Where I love the equivalent to your Gatorade is when you're ill, most notably with gastroenteritis. Can't eat anything. but the sugar, electrolytes and water == good, good, good!
      Perhaps it is especially stupid to be afraid of your food, and if your soda makes you feel better go for it. Daily intake and soda at the meal's table is where I think it's stupid. It's fairly similar to drinking alcohol at same quantities and frequency (which is something I did while acting smug about no drinking sugary)

    3. Re:Nope by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Drinking it isn't the problem, it is all the peeling and extracting that is the problem.

      Put that same fruit into a blender and make a nice smoothie from the whole food, and then you can drink it with no change in healthiness.

    4. Re:Nope by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      if your soda makes you feel better go for it

      Yeah, heroin too; if it makes you feel better, it must be good!

      And if you're happy when you're drunk, then alcoholism is probably good for you.

    5. Re:Nope by flickwipe · · Score: 1

      >Where I love the equivalent to your Gatorade is when you're ill, most notably with gastroenteritis. Gatoradenteritis

    6. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's never a great idea to drink your calories.

      It's almost never a good idea to use the word 'never' in an argument or when making it point: it demonstrates that you are an incompetent thinker. The words 'always', 'everybody', 'nobody' are also problematic.

      In this case, you might consider that some people won't have any way to get calories other than drinking. They might be sick, and unable to swallow solid food. In that case, drinking one's calories is a great idea.

      Similarly, putting calories in drink form can allow them to be more efficiently stored (prior to drinking) and absorbed (while drinking), both of which can be convenient and sensible in certain situations, a great idea.

      Many people like to use small amounts of juice to flavor their water. This is also a great idea: it helps people stay hydrated, and gives some health benefits from the fruit.

      In short, you didn't bother to effectively use your brain before making your post. Perhaps a course in critical thinking skills would be appropriate.

  7. "Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Informative
    Of course there's a lot of sugar in fruit drinks, that's the purpose of them.

    .
    This should not be a surprise to anyone who reads the nutrition label of what they are eating and drinking.

    1. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't drink those. If I hear a sound report claiming similar health problems from 100% fruit juice I would take note. It's currently my main A + C vitamin source (I read the labels).

    2. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda

      True, if you read the label "Fruit drinks" are mostly sugar and water the same as soda. They add a tiny amount of real juice so they can say "Made with real juice" but it is really just sugar water.

    3. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They add a tiny amount of real juice so they can say "Made with real juice" but it is really just sugar water.

      Isn't that misleading and deceptive? Why don't the government food regulators shut them down?

    4. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because too may people think class action lawsuits are evil because you personally won't get thousands of dollars from them. So because you won't get a massive payout, companies should be free to do whatever the fuck they want because you're a savoy consumer and know all their tricks. If someone else gets scammed, well, that fool deserved it. That and because you don't vote in honest people to represent you, assuming you even bother to vote at all. And no, voting for the President doesn't count. He's only in charge of the military and foreign policy.

      "100% fruit juice" means for that part of the product that is juice, all of that juice came from fruit. So even if the product is 98.7% gasoline and 1% juice, "100% fruit juice" is still a legal label if all of that 1% juice came from fruits.

    5. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Did you get dropped on your head? Did you even think before you typed that?

    6. Re:"Fruit drinks" are basically uncarbonated soda by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      you're a savoy consumer

      It's quite healthy if you resist the temptation to smother it in butter, which is difficult because the little ridges could have been designed for that purpose.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Follow the money by Teun · · Score: 1

    Follow the money, as every farmer knows there is more money in processing his perfectly good produce than he'll ever see for it.

    I have to watch out my sugar intake and investigated typical sugar content of several juices as I like them.
    The result is there is nearly as much sugar in a good (freshly pressed) apple or orange juice than there is in the same measure of soda.

    So I've moved to eating the whole fruit, it is just as or even more satisfying than drinking the juice because it fills you up and even better, you get all the vitamins, minerals and fiber that's part of the fruit.

    But ultimately I drink more water, tap water as it's in this country much cleaner than the overpriced stuff from bottles.
    Within two weeks my blood sugar level went from on the verge of dangerous 7+ to comfortable 4 - 4.5.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  9. The Wizardty of Chemistry by OpinOnion · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I'm comfortable paying for studies that 'prove' well known scientific facts. Yes.. sugar does in fact have calories and amazingly those drinks have their calories and sugar content listed on them.. as if for some divine reason. Was there really any doubt or any push back to the fact that fruit drinks have calories and those calories affect you mostly in the same way as any food or drink? Decades ago on a planet much skinner than today, people drank fruit drinks responsibly - that means in small portions or watered down. They were also more active. It's sad that decades later we are treating common dieting sense as some kind of new science that needs to still be proven.

    1. Re:The Wizardty of Chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common sense is one thing, but this modern world, it seems we want something else. A solution that rather than say, a shovel digging a hole to excavate an opening, a precise tunnel drilled in exactly the area we want so that a pipe can be laid with far less labors.

    2. Re:The Wizardty of Chemistry by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      This is not so much a study about basic physiology, I see it more as a study about demographics (esp. the one on BMJ.com)

      Also, common sense is something that can get lost, along with popular culture or folk culture and little know-how like sewing and such.
      One example : nowadays, you can find yourself learning how to handwash a few clothes or how to polish shoes for the first time ever in your life, at 30-year-old. Did you know how to polish shoes at 10-year-old in the 60s? Sure, I guess. Now it depends on a "lifestyle choice".
      What's the month oranges are most grown? I don't know.

    3. Re:The Wizardty of Chemistry by doom · · Score: 1

      "Yes.. sugar does in fact have calories and amazingly those drinks have their calories and sugar content listed on them.. "

      Yes, it's just thermodynamics! Except that it isn't because there's a human being in the loop acting as a control system, and so there are complicated psychological and physiological effects going on that no one seems to understand terribly well.

      Are high carbohydrate diets bad? Then how do you explain the Japanese?

      Are high fat diets bad? Then how do you explain the French?

      Could it be that sugar is a particularly bad form of carbohydrates? Well sure it could be... but if all you've got is an argument from correlation (sugar intake up => obesity rate up) then you don't actually know much, because it could easily be something more complicated (economy up => sugar intake up plus economy up => gasoline intake up).

      In conclusion: (1) Shit is complicated. Don't believe anything but a full lifestyle, cross-cultural comparison, (2) What you shove in your mouth matters less than if you get off of your butt, (3) "We need more willpower" isn't a solution or there wouldn't be a problem. Kill your automobile.

    4. Re:The Wizardty of Chemistry by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      What is "common dieting sense"? People toss the words "common sense" around like it's some magic elixir that everyone just knows. The best scientific data on the health of many foods has changed over time. Eggs, wine, liver, diet soda....so don't pretend the majority of people know what's healthy to eat and what's not.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  10. 100%, yeah right by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    The difference between sugar water and super clarified apple juice is pretty marginal. That's why the 100% stuff is still sweetened, it's a scam more or less. A marketing gimmick.

  11. "Heavily Processed" by cirby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, when you see a doom-and-gloom article like this one, and one of the phrases is "heavily processed" or the new catchphrase "ultra-processed," you can safely ignore it.

    "Heavily processed" is such a wide definition that it's effectively meaningless. Anything that contains extra sugar (in any amount), white flour (or any other refined grains), anything that has "artificial" coloring (even if the color comes from natural sources), refined oils (like soybean oil, which was a "health food" twenty years ago), or even low-fat foods (whether or not they're naturally low in fats).

    When you get right down to it, these sorts of articles are trying to get you worked up about processed foods - in other words, ANYTHING that comes in a package. "So buy our Cool New Healthy Food, at only three times the price!"

    Of course, the people who are worked up about processed foods are just the spiritual descendants of the people who used to tell you to switch to processed food because the older, natural foods were supposed to be bad for you. I remember when the health nuts told us to switch from butter to margarine because butter was bad - and now we know that margarine is immensely worse for cardiovascular health.

    1. Re:"Heavily Processed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll agree on the "heavily processed part" if only because in this case flavored sugar water ("fruit drinks") are hardly complicated or need heavy processing.

      They still aren't good for you though. The main reason to stop with drinking cola was to stop flooding your system with SUGAR. Which these things contain just as much of, with pretty much no nutritional value otherwise.

      Fruit Drinks typically have no vitamin C in it. Something you would expect from something like FRUIT. If the label doesn't at least have something like 30% Vitamin C, you should just put it back or stop living in denial and just grab the cola - at least it'll taste better while setting you up for the same problems years down the road.

      (Even with real juice, keep in mind that you shouldn't be drinking it like water. It still has sugar, although natural ones.)

    2. Re:"Heavily Processed" by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Why bitch about simple statements of facts? The study finds that 90% of added sugars come from so-called heavily or ultra processed foods, which is enormous and something sgnificant to know.
      Just stating it does not make it a conspiracy from Nanny State, advertisers and "health nuts" to talk you down as if you're a little child. I'll allow myself to tell you that's ridiculous.
      You're trying to fit facts around preconceived notions that they must come from that PETA bitch, the teacher assistants, the pale-skinned vegan and all sorts of such people that are out there to piss you off.

      I ended up reading the defintions used for "processed" and "ultra-processed" foods (bmj.com). Says sugar is allowed in "merely processed" foods.

      This classification includes four groups: ‘unprocessed or minimally processed foods’ (such as fresh, dry or frozen fruits or vegetables, grains, legumes, meat, fish and milk); ‘processed culinary ingredients’ (including table sugar, oils, fats, salt, and other substances extracted from foods or from nature, and used in kitchens to make culinary preparations); ‘processed foods’ (foods manufactured with the addition of salt or sugar or other substances of culinary use to unprocessed or minimally processed foods, such as canned food and simple breads and cheese) and ‘ultra-processed foods’ (formulations of several ingredients which, besides salt, sugar, oils and fats, include food substances not used in culinary preparations, in particular, flavours, colours, sweeteners, emulsifiers and other additives used to imitate sensorial qualities of unprocessed or minimally processed foods and their culinary preparations or to disguise undesirable qualities of the final product).

      By that measure I've often consumed ultra-processed food that has no added sugar in it (or perhap very little, depending) : industrial pizzas (but that's in France, where e.g. bread with no sugar is a lot more common)
      But think of the BBQ sauce, ketchup, drinks (any), chocolate milk, crap like cupcakes and so on, waffles, even sauces. It's very easy to eat a monthly dose worth of sugar in a single day.

      What about mayonnaise instead, peanut butter, whatever?
      Snacking on an egg sandwich. That seems M'URRICAN !! isn't it? I'd love to have a stay in the US of A and have a try at the meat pie, chicago pizza, chili, egg sandwiches and whatever - likely some heart-attack dudebro cooking with layers of bacon and cheese, that sounds a lot of fun. I wouldn't be there for the doritos and oreos.

    3. Re:"Heavily Processed" by cirby · · Score: 1

      Why bitch about simple statements of facts? The study finds that 90% of added sugars come from so-called heavily or ultra processed foods, which is enormous and something sgnificant to know.

      ...except that it becomes a circular definition.

      When you say that adding sugar MAKES it a "heavily processed" food, then the fact that 90% of added sugar comes from that food is a given.

      You cited one source for definitions for "heavily" and "ultra" processed food - but when you read other sources, you get different definitions. That's the problem - you don't get to pick one you sort of agree with and pretend that it covers everything else.

    4. Re:"Heavily Processed" by doom · · Score: 1

      I was looking for some reason to assume that sugar is the great devil, but they just take that as a given, something that everyone is supposed to know.

      One thing that I know is that you should worry about exercise first-- but that's apparently too horrible a thought for most people to contemplate, they prefer to obsess about what they're shoving in their mouths.

      Worried about your health? Let your sugar intake ride, but cut down on gasoline.

    5. Re:"Heavily Processed" by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have to be three times the price. Eat as a mother born 70+ years ago would have you eat. More one ingredient foods - chicken, beef, pork, fish, potato, kale, etc. Not beef smothered in a bunch of stuff or a potato that has a bunch of stuff on it. You can eat very well for not a whole lot of money. Get the 101 hcg diet cook book for example.

      Just have to decide if you're going to be a fat person or not. If you want to be thin, the way to do it is out there.

  12. People should learn how to shop ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

    Setting aside that whole juice vs. drink bit, which can only be used as a high level filter, processed foods have ingredient and nutrition labels. People should check them when they are buying a new product rather than depending upon manufacturer's claims.

    Also learn how to check the products next to it. Those cheap alternatives are often better for you than the expensive brands.

    1. Re:People should learn how to shop ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The only brand of shredded wheat that I can find that is "100% whole wheat" is also the cheapest store brand on the market. :)

      The only brand of stone ground horseradish mustard without added sugar, emulsifiers, or mystery ingredients like "natural flavor"... cheapest store brand.

      But then I have to pay double for the cheapest brand of ketchup that doesn't have corn syrup. Same for pickles without polysorbate 80.

      In the end, I think reading labels lets me buy only quality foods, and for about the same price as if I was buying whatever the market leader is for each product.

      No diet beats the health benefits of a "grandma diet." And it tastes better too... if you know how to cook and like to prepare your meals.

  13. So what? by Kohath · · Score: 0

    Stop trying to be everyone's mom and mind your own business.

    And don't try to feed us "we pay for health care so all your food is our business" (and we've appointed ourselves you new mom, and you will obey us or else). If you're paying for someone's health care, it's because you offered to pay. Rescind the offer if you don't like where the money is going.

    1. Re:So what? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      If you're paying for someone's health care, it's because you offered to pay. Rescind the offer if you don't like where the money is going.

      It's a democracy. I can choose to vote one way or the other, but I can't just decide not to follow the law without nasty consequences.

    2. Re:So what? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      No : stop obeying your moms, called Kraft Foods, Pepsi, Coca etc.
      If enough people do that, then the co-pay on your healthcare could be eliminated, for example (in theory).

    3. Re:So what? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Votes don't justify bullying or oppressing people.

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you can legislate as to what people consume you need to show evidence of impending harm to yourself or others attributable to that consumption.

      Which basically means no, you have no vote over what we can/cannot all drink. Legislating is a privilege we have extended to our hired representatives - there are limits to the scope and authority of those legislative powers which we the people determine. In a variety of ways.

  14. Stay away from the center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just go into any American Supermarket and look at the ingredients of the things that you put in your basket.

    The dieticians will give a rule of thumb that says stay away from the center isles where all the processed and packaged foods are.

    The outside - the walls - are usually where the refrigerated lean meats and fish, produce and dairy is. And just get whole grains: if it's brown it's good; white is bad.

    The unfortunate thing is that the packaged food producers have got human tastes down to a science and know how to stimulate tastes that kept us alive when we were hunter gatherers but now make us obese.

    And our modern lifestyle just isn't a healthy one either. Sometime someone made it a badge of honor to over work oneself until it has become expected that one has live to work instead of the more sane attitude of working to live. But that's a different topic all together.

  15. Fruit drinks aren't *any* better for you than soda by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    IMO there's no need to qualify it with "aren't much better for you".

  16. Water by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >"the two main sources being soft drinks (17 percent) closely followed by fruit drinks (14 percent). (In this case, 'fruit drinks' refers to processed juices with added sugars.)"

    It really doesn't matter much if the juice is 100% natural or a dilution with added sugars. It is still sugar without the rest of the fruit solids (which contains fiber, pectin, and other components). Drinking a glass of fruit juice is not a natural way to consume fruit... it is rapidly taking in a huge quantity of unregulated simple calories.

    Fruit juice is just mostly sugar water. If you want to be "healthy" and/or lose weight and/or prevent insulin spikes then drink water. Then, optionally eat a single serving of WHOLE fruit (like one apple or one peach or something) if you want fruit.

    1. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure water has no flavor at all. It not always refreshing. But, it's not a binary choice. You can just add a little fruit juice to the water and bam! lower sugar than pure juice and yet not flavorless.

      An annoying problem is that you just can't find pure fruit juice anywhere. Everything has added sugar or "natural flavors" or what have you. What the hell are "natural flavors" and why aren't they listed?

    2. Re:Water by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Water, tea (unsweetened), or coffee (black).

    3. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water

      No flavor

      tea (unsweetened)

      tastes horrible

      or coffee (black).

      tastes horrible enough that I would almost consider going without coffee if that's my only option.

      What is the point of being healthy and living a long life if you have to spend every day consuming things that are either tasteless or disgusting?

  17. Eating fruit vs squeezing juice by lbalbalba · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slightly off-topic, but: even an home made freshly squeezed glass of fruit juice supposedly contains more sugar than is healthy for you. Think about it: on average, how much oranges would you need to squeeze for a single glass of juice ? Three or four oranges ? Might not seem like a lot, until you consider *eating* those same four oranges at once. The proclaimed result ? Eating a single orange is good for you, but taking in - the sugars of - four oranges is bad.

    1. Re:Eating fruit vs squeezing juice by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Also, eating an orange means you're getting quite a bit more fiber.

    2. Re:Eating fruit vs squeezing juice by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      IMHO, this is perfectly on topic. Fructose is fine when eating whole fruits, because they are digested more slowly due to fiber and all that.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Eating fruit vs squeezing juice by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      IMHO, this is perfectly on topic. Fructose is fine when eating whole fruits,

      So far so good, this is well established by research.

      because they are digested more slowly due to fiber and all that.

      But that part goes off the rails; they're still trying to figure out why. That is one hypothesis.

  18. You are confused by s.petry · · Score: 1

    "Juicer" typically indicates that you make your own beverage from fresh fruits and veggies, which is not at all unhealthy (1)(2). "Fruit Juice" as TFA is discussing is processed fruit juice, generally chemically reduced to concentrate and added to sugar water (HFCS specifically). The primary difference between soda and 99% of the commercially produced "Fruit Juices" is the lack of carbonation in the latter. In many cases, there is more sugar added to juices than there is in soda.

    1. Eating large quantities of certain vegetables and fruits will cause severe illness. Research, research, and research!
    2. Juice bars have a variety of drinks, some of which contain sorbet and other sources and forms of sugar. Research is important here too!

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:You are confused by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      "Juicer" typically indicates that you make your own beverage from fresh fruits and veggies, which is not at all unhealthy

      That depends on the ratio between fruit and veggies. Most fruit is high in sugar, while most veggies are low. If you juice from pure fruit, it's quite unhealthy.

  19. sugar is bad for you by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    the source is irrelevant.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
  20. Best time to be alive by burtosis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Humans typically starving and suffering malnutrition most of the time for over a hundred thousand years, and before that our ancestor species back more than a billion years. Our appetite craves the sugar and fat that helped humans stave off death. Now with cheap, abundant, and tasty foods everywhere through technological advances we have to deal with whole populations being over fed. People actually complain food is too easy to consume like processed and fast foods. Many poor people eat better than kings just 1000 years ago.

    I love it! There simply isn't a better time to be alive. Give me diabetes and obesity any day over dying at 12 from starvation. I, for one, am grateful to our new corpulent overlords.

    1. Re:Best time to be alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to google corpulent:

      corpulent /kôrpylnt/
      adjective
      (of a person) fat.

      lol, so blunt.

    2. Re:Best time to be alive by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Especially since at this stage we have the choice to eat less rather than being forced by circumstance to do so.

  21. 32 oz of OJ by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    when was the last time you saw someone drink 32 oz of OJ at once. But Coke? yes.

    sugar in your OJ is not OJ either.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:32 oz of OJ by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Rum goes better with Coke.

    2. Re:32 oz of OJ by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Tequila and OJ

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:32 oz of OJ by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I dunno...it's not hard to find 20 ounce containers of orange juice in convenience stores.

  22. 58 percent - more than half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it even "almost 2/3rd"?

  23. Old news... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 2

    It's 2016! Who the hell didn't know this already?!?! WTF

  24. Who fucking cares? by jcr · · Score: 1

    What the FUCK is this doing on slashdot?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Who fucking cares? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Please explain why this isn't suitable for Slashdot, other than the fact that you care so little about it that you felt obliged to tell us how little you care about it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Who fucking cares? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Please explain why this isn't suitable for Slashdot,

      It's a standard consumer scare story. Does the phrase "stuff that matters" ring any bells with you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. Tired Of Hearing These Assholes. by zenlessyank · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been hearing this shit since I was a little kid in the 70's. This country has way too many assholes making a living by spreading FUD. NEWS FLASH- IF YOU OVERCONSUME, YOU MAY DIE. Just pick something. It doesn't matter what it is. Water, aspirin, Boones Farm, eggs, republicans, democrats, salt........... Someone please lock these bastards up and throw away the key.

  26. Garbage Study! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title of the thing is:

    > Fruit Drinks Aren't Much Better For You Than Soda: Study

    That implies that they are comparing one serving of one to one serving of the other.

    > And almost 90 percent of the added sugars Americans consume came from heavily processed foods --
    > the two main sources being soft drinks (17 percent) closely followed by fruit drinks (14 percent).

    That's irrelevant. The question is: How does one serving of fruit drink compare to one serving of soft drink?

  27. Its all bad for you by rossdee · · Score: 1

    so we shouldn't drink anything

  28. Amerifats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is it with Americans and adding sugar to fucking juice?!
    I water down most of the juice I drink, because it's too damn sweet already.

    1. Re:Amerifats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, you fucking imbecile.

    2. Re:Amerifats by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Silly rabbit. As an American I can explain this to you. We don't add sugar to juice.

      What some people add sugar to is water, flavored by 5 to 10% juice.

      It is just a variety of Earth Sugardrink that is not carbonated. I suspect it is also sold in your country, although you may use different words for it. In fact, if you looked into it you would find that while the most popular brands of Earth Sugardrink are American, nevertheless Americans do not have the highest rate of consumption of Sugardrink.

  29. Mother in Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mother in law has a penchant for "fruit drinks" because they are "healthy".

    "Look here: it says 'Made with 2% real juice!' That means its good for you!"
    (also HFCS, water, two different preservatives, artificial color, artificial flavor)

    and another beautiful gem "They wouldn't be allowed to sell it if it wasn't healthy!"

  30. Sodas are also fruit juice by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Check the labels. Sodas are mostly lemon and lime juice.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Sodas are also fruit juice by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but in the USA, sodas are mostly High Fructose Corn Syrup. They do contain citric acid, but the citric acid used is made from aspergillus niger. Even the lemon and lime flavored sodas rarely contain lemon or lime.

  31. Or to put it another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soda and soft drinks aren't much worse for you than fruit drinks.

  32. Vacuum bottles and water by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    Vacuum steel bottles and water.

    I have a one-liter hydroflask for the house and disc golf, and a 16-ounce Bubba with a barrel shape for the car (so as to fit the minuscule cupholder in my car)

    Bottle water is a racket. Don't feed the plastic monster

    As for soda.. completely kicked the habit after spending some time in a hospital. When I came back I found I couldn't stand the taste of any of them.. except for Boylan's Birch Beer. So I cut soda out cold turkey.

    Fruit drink? Rarely. An Izze here, a smoothie there, but those are maybe one once a month.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Vacuum bottles and water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vacuum steel bottles and water.

      I have a one-liter hydroflask for the house and disc golf, and a 16-ounce Bubba with a barrel shape for the car (so as to fit the minuscule cupholder in my car)

      Bottle water is a racket. Don't feed the plastic monster

      As for soda.. completely kicked the habit after spending some time in a hospital. When I came back I found I couldn't stand the taste of any of them.. except for Boylan's Birch Beer. So I cut soda out cold turkey.

      Fruit drink? Rarely. An Izze here, a smoothie there, but those are maybe one once a month.

      Just like you, I kicked the soda habit back in 2010 but went one further. I now survive on coffee, lots of water (150 ounces a day) and earl grey tea and my blood sugar almost never goes above 120 after meals. (I am a type 1 diabetic btw, you normals might do even better.) I have also dropped 70 pounds of body fat and am in the best shape of my life at age 43.

    2. Re:Vacuum bottles and water by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Well done! I"m a "normal" but have had diabetics as relatives and co-workers, so I know of the hassles and dangers..

      I didn't mention coffee / tea because slashdot being a tech site and all... it's a given we all ingest mass quantities of caffeine in various forms =o)

      I *think* it was in Bloom County or other Berkeley Breathed comic, but someone reffered to pepsi as "malted battery acid"

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    3. Re:Vacuum bottles and water by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Couple this with the fact that bottled water is often of dubious quality, and can have a foul taste and smell. If you want better water than your municipal tap get a Berkey water filter (with a Doulton candle NOT one of those 'black berkey' filters) and put the water in your bottle.

  33. No surprise to any adult by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    I can't drink that stuff, tastes like candy syrup! Pretty much the only thing I can stand to drink (apart from beer or coffee) is water or milk, or a slightly sweetened iced tea. I'll eat a fruit but I can't stand the candy drink.

  34. Gur, Jaggery and Panela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop eating refined sugar, and switch to Gur and Jaggery.

    Gur, Jaggery and Panela taste much better and are more healthful.

    We make our own, and that's the only sugar we have used for many, many years.

  35. Sugar the bitter truth - Robert Lustig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have posted this before here in slashdot for another topic, It's related enough to be here.
     

    [Sugar - The bitter truth by Dr Robert H. Lustig, University of California Television (UCTV)] https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] [Warning: 90 minutes]

    This is the best math I've seen about sugar, coca-cola, energy drinks and obesity.

    captcha: continue

    1. Re:Sugar the bitter truth - Robert Lustig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, copy pasted the text without review. Link:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

  36. Non-processed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not processed juices have high calorie content too. If you want to avoid sugars juices aren't the best, but as drinks they are much better than any soft drinks. Depending on the juice you get vitamins, minerals and even fibers. Of course I'm talking about Juice as Europe defines it, all natural not some sort of what we call "nectar", that is sugary water with the taste of whatever fruit it's supposed to be.

  37. Another study that points out the obvious, but I guess it's good to get more cite-able research out there. Fruit drinks deceive people with what's known as a "health halo". Fruit sounds healthful, therefore things made from fruit or that contain fruit juice must also be healthful. Fruits are indeed good for you because they contain good nutrients and most contain a lot of fiber (the latter of which helps delay the absorption of fructose that would otherwise cause a blood sugar spike). Processed fruit juices, on the other hand, are obtained by several different but substantially similar methods: The peel or rind is removed (which strips away much of the fiber), then the fruit is pulped or crushed, then all of that material is mechanically sifted out and discarded (which removes the rest of the fiber and a large amount of the nutrients). What's left is just juice, primarily sugar water. Many manufacturers will take this a step further, by boiling or evaporating away the water. What remains is mostly just fruit sugar (fructose), with scarcely even a hint of the original fruit's flavor. They then add this sugar to beverages, and then they can truthfully say the product "contains real fruit juice!"

  38. Be Safe..Drink Beer... by steelframe · · Score: 2

    I put exactly one drop of grapefruit oil in each glass of my home made IPA. I count that as juice.

    1. Re:Be Safe..Drink Beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put exactly one drop of grapefruit oil in each glass of my home made IPA.
      I count that as juice.

      Ah, the good old homeopathic lager!

  39. Drinks with 0 vitamins ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... yet labeled as juice is the normal. Many times I picked up bottles that call itself juice and then there are no vitamins listed under the nutritional info. How Minute Maid, for instance, manages to do that while using real fruit as an ingredient is beyond me.

    1. Re:Drinks with 0 vitamins ... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      I would guess that the processing destroyed most of the vitamins, and the amount varied too widely to even get a reliable minimum level, so they simply didn't list 'em.

  40. Here's a recent study with the opposite result: by ffkom · · Score: 1

    http://www.sgf.org/fileadmin/u... As so often in medicine, "evidence" is brought forward for and against anything.

    1. Re:Here's a recent study with the opposite result: by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Orange juice seems to be an exception to the rule, perhaps because of its propensity for containing pulp, the flesh of the fruit.

      There are even studies that report of its ability to counteract the damage caused by high fat meals.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  41. I tried to switch to juices by pepsikid · · Score: 1

    Back in college, I tried to lose my soda habit for something healthier. Frozen concentrates were the best option, saving me from lugging bulky jugs of colored water home in my backpack. I tried "Mr. Pure Papaya Juice". Tasted like ass and made my tongue sting.

    Ingredients: no actual papaya at all, just grape and apple from concentrate and tons of HFCS.

    "Mr Pure", folks.

    1. Re:I tried to switch to juices by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The idea of wasting fuel to ship WATER just amazes me. Frozen concentrated juice is best - and add your own water.

  42. I gave up soda a long time ago for pop. by LazLong · · Score: 1

    After moving to the Midwest I couldn't find soda. I'd go to my local grocery store or Wal-Mart and ask for "soda" and people would look at me confusedly and say they don't carry it. So, I had to switch to 'pop.'

    1. Re:I gave up soda a long time ago for pop. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Gee, if you move to Boston you'll have to switch to tonic.

  43. Helpful by badramalik08 · · Score: 0

    This thread is too much helpful for me .. I realy like to drink soda .. thanks to add this ... http://videoonline.pk/watch.ph... 4 Health Foods That Aren't Healthy

  44. check the sugar (in grams) of sport drinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are frequently half or less sugar in a sport drink of the same volume. Of course if you are skipping a 12 ounce soda in preference for a 22 ounces "power" drink, you're probably not doing yourself any favors.

    I've mostly switched to black coffee.

  45. Hot water by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Drink hot water and go for one hour early morning walk;

  46. ABA Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be clear, 100 percent juice does not contain added sugar and can be a part of a balanced diet. Moreover, these products provide more than simple refreshment. Many deliver important vitamins, minerals and antioxidants. We would also add that these products – and other American beverages – are clearly labeled so that consumers can make informed choices. In sum, this study is inaccurate and misleading.