Kentsfield also need to use the FSB for each set of core to talk to each other. Amd true quad-core will likely kick it a** in a repeat of the first duel cores.
multiple cores is a bad thing for intels FSB and in 2 way and up amd's cpu can talk to each other with out haveing to go though the chip set and haveing ram access in the cpu means that their is less data that needs to go over the link form the cpu to the chip set.
AMD advantage will come back with quad-core CPU as the Intel ones are the hack jobs of there first duel cores and with the Intel chip set NO SLI, NO Cross Fire apple will loss some of the high market on just that.
Amd Also has plans for Hyper Transport based cards and Co-processors that sound like the next thing to have in the high end market and people in it who are not into games may want to go for it.
Amd's k8l will have shared L3 with unique L1 and L2 cache per core
Intel's quad-cores will be 2 dule core linked buy a FSB sound like a repeat of there dule cores.
Slashdot Mirror
forgot one
Pinball -- People smack balls to into walls and targets with flippers and they also nudge the games.
Kentsfield also need to use the FSB for each set of core to talk to each other.
Amd true quad-core will likely kick it a** in a repeat of the first duel cores.
Intel FSB can't handle 8 cores so thay are trying to down play it. Just wait a see what amd can do with 2 quad-core cpus.
Intel FSB can handle 8 cores so thay are trying to down play it. Just wait a see what amd can do with 2 quad-core cpus.
It was good enough and cheap enough to be in pinball 2000
He is talking about more then one feed aka each one is on there own grid
HTX based ATI video cards are a better idea then one in the cpu
and you have to deal with the TPS reports form all of the people under you
A AMD or Intel duel core is fine and on the 24 AMD is going to have big price cuts. Get one gig of ram and video card as well.
video of ita goVotingMachine
http://www.boomchicago.nl/Section/Videos/BoomChic
that 4 year old computer will go form overkill to a pos with windows vista.
amd 4x4 is a stop gap in tell kl8 come out and that will have true quad-core + 4x4 will be able to take 2 quad-core cpu when they come out.
AMD's true quad-cores will intels ass and you will be able to use 2 quad-cores in a 4x4 system as well.
multiple cores is a bad thing for intels FSB and in 2 way and up amd's cpu can talk to each other with out haveing to go though the chip set and haveing ram access in the cpu means that their is less data that needs to go over the link form the cpu to the chip set.
It not a mistake it's Intel mind set of still useing a FSB
Thay are planing HTX slot based accelerater cards as well. So be on the look out for FPGA HTX cards
or some may want to shut down a ETC system to get out of paying tolls
AMD advantage will come back with quad-core CPU as the Intel ones are the hack jobs of there first duel cores and with the Intel chip set NO SLI, NO Cross Fire apple will loss some of the high market on just that.
Amd Also has plans for Hyper Transport based cards and Co-processors that sound like the next thing to have in the high end market and people in it who are not into games may want to go for it.
At a price that is way to much
and you may want a pci-e sata card maby even a h/w raid one
lack of good shows I know of good ones star gate sg1 and sga are good also check out the 4400
Amd's k8l will have shared L3 with unique L1 and L2 cache per core Intel's quad-cores will be 2 dule core linked buy a FSB sound like a repeat of there dule cores.
not when you are useing raid
If you want good video
They have been testing them with the stargate for the past few years