you had given a link containing a lot of psychotic behaviour belonging to you. kudos. i wouldnt be able to find it myself if i had tried to, but since you havent been able to get over it and still keep the link to it handy, i dont even need to. you will be there for me, providing the link.
thank you. oh and by the way, i loved your parent comment too, a lot of insults, a lot of aggression. trademark.
working 7 to 19.00 every day, in a thankless job that demands way more than it pays ?
or, they should have fit in sleazy bar corners, wasting their life away with sluts (male or female) ?
or, they should become career bitches (male or female) and waste their life away in that manner ?
or they should have fit in with a family. but then again, they have to create a family first, and creating a family has SO much overhead and effort in these days that you can maybe compare it to swimming across english channel.
or, they should have fit in with the immense crowds that are sedating their brain through football spectatorship, or in front of dumb tv shows each night ?
or maybe they could have fit in with their peers, who are entertaining themselves with the MODERN entertainment form that is called gaming ? you know, fitting in WITH YOUR PEERS, as countless generations in the history of mankind has done ?
well. they are just doing that. i think a lot of people, but especially 'experts' need to shut their traps about it, and get to accept this as a normal stage of human civilization.
For, its practically simple as this ; 'dont do anything you wouldnt like to others'.
prison sentence ? cash penalty ? public service ? all irrelevant to this crime.
but, subjecting them to the same treatment, is up to the point.
punishing individuals with penalties irrelevant to their crime havent accomplished much to this point. before criticizing something with nonsense, you should get your argument together first, but do it with observation.
where all kind of ethical lacking, greed, bastardliness goes around. they would be exploited to hell.
cloning and bringing to life a lost specie is like having a child. only a responsible civilization that is past preliminary stages of being a responsible society should be allowed to.
take oscommerce. there are already zillions of modules out there, for every kind of task you can imagine to extend its functions, leave aside itself being a full fledged estore software.
but, leave aside axing business, this is actually creating a lot more business.
no 2 businesses are exactly the same. as a developer who works on commercial oscommerce mod and support, you cant imagine what kind of modifications businesses may ask to get done. you'd say 2 businesses were exactly the same if you check out their composition, but, one comes and wants something done, and the other wants same thing done, but a slight modification, which is very important to them. not only that but all businesses are trying to modify and change their offerings to do better business. or, hell, even the integrations in between different estores performing different functions (wholesale outlet, retail outlet, need to maintain different branding) can create huge projects.
of course, estores is an area that is open to many modification. it may not reflect as the same in each and every kind of software application field.
but, even if modding isnt, support is something that can never go away. when businesses need support, they need it fast, they need it good. any business doing acceptable levels of profits will be requiring decent support from a professional conduct company.
put hillary for secretary of state. despite what hillary says, noone outside america takes her seriously. and that 'no way no how' kind rhetoric doesnt work in international politics.
he is thinking of neocon national security chief in place. unbelievable.
and now this. an idiot who tried to fool courts into preventing free speech on the internet, is for attorney general.
what's next step ? mugabe for human rights czar ?
dont get me wrong, i support obama. but this going is not good.
the more such organizations post crap like this, the lesser my respect for that political viewpoint becomes.
it appears that libertarian view is becoming a refuge for the shysters that screwed entire world through the 'let everything be' preaching of holistic economists, since republican party is down in fortunes these days.
DONT accept them into your view. they will screw not only you, but entire world, again, if you let them.
the 'free market' was supposed to ensure fair competition and fair share in television and radio broadcasting, and printed media too.
did it deliver?
no.
in all countries, more than half of the publications and broadcasts belong to 1-2 cartels, which are generally aligned with a particular political party, and they ensure that the persons who will support their own ends will get elected.
the 'free market' was going to assure fair competition in finance world and would regulate it itself, according to alan fucking greenspan.
did it deliver ?
yes it delivered. it delivered RIGHT up to our butt. we are STILL on the opening stages of the crisis.
just a month ago the proponent of that sermon came up in front of u.s. senate and admitted to his fault, said that he couldnt believe what happened.
he knows what happened, we know what happened. CEOS, high level executives, shareholders are people too. there are crooks, bastards, irresponsibles, slackers, shysters, all kinds among them. there are those among them who wouldnt hesitate from breaking ENTIRE global economy to reap benefits.
thats the human factor.
human factor is there at the controlling helms of the internet connectivity providers too. which, not surprisingly generally belong to big cartels that own already trivialized broadcasting and printed media.
one would be utterly stupid as to think that repetition of what happened in financial sector is not possible.
somehow IRS's reaction just happened to coincide with the aftermath of yahoo escapade, and right before the neocon administration leaves power, which will ultimately leading to replacement of many high level bureaucrats on top of controlling agencies.
and RIGHT at the time yahoo issue resurfaced......
internet is not your local ma&pa shop or small business.
internet affects A LOT of things. leave aside entertainment, a lot of services that are serving vital functions of the society ranging from companies serving in security areas to health industry, even many local and national government organizations run a lot of services for performing the daily tasks they are responsible with.
no, internet, no part of it can be anyone's backyard, anyone's 'own property'. its VERY vital and VERY public, VERY STRATEGICAL to be allowed to.
think of the land ownership concept. are landowners allowed to do anything on their property, because they bought them or leased them ? what if i wanted to fill all the land i own with dung ? or what if i decided to feed wild wolves in it ? or god forbid, what if i decided to declare my own little kingdom's independency ?
seems far fetched ? it isnt. until 150 years ago or so, there werent laws that are preventing individuals or companies from buying land larger than a certain size.
if you let an individual buy enough land, that land would eventually have the capability to sustain itself in regard to all needs and services, from mining to agriculture, and therefore could easily be independent of the nation it was in. think - everyting belonging to one man or company in an area the size of california. or scotland. or ireland...
so to prevent this, laws were made. in modern countries, you cant buy more than a certain defined area of land.
internet is no different than land. noone has the right to close a portion and do whatever they please on it.
microsoft has much more to lose than apple, concerning google and firefox. AND, they are on the retreat and decline at all fronts, even including OS front, after the even microsoft confirmed failure that vista has been.
on a sinking ship like this, the sentiment to find a scapegoat, a target, something to take vengeance on is sought generally. and microsoft's corporate culture is no mother theresa.
back in the yahoo story a few days ago, i told that it smelled microsoft all over, and then modded to oblivion and yanked with replies defending microsoft, saying there was NO wrongdoing on microsoft's part, despite the investigation was started by DOJ, which is still populated with the neocon administration which has been WAY chummy with microsoft.
now, suddenly, IRS gets in the picture, and on the target there a major competitor and a major headache for microsoft. despite there are numerous open source software using same kind of deal with various corporations for funds, somehow, for some reason, its google+mozilla that irs feels the need to investigate.
of course, that again has no relation to microsoft, which is best pals with the neocon administration still in power. the thing is just a coincidence.
there are nobody over me with the power to stop me from crying, therefore if i want to cry over anything, i can.
not being an american, i dont have to suffer your society's shortcomings and negative attitude towards emotions and the havoc that wreaks in your psychological health in later stages of your lives.
and in addition, being free to do as such, im NOT dealing with it, and accusing microsoft of wrongdoing in this event.
doesnt need proof tho. they stopped short of a hostile takeover when they calculated that that would shatter their reputation pr wise. microsoft is not denying that. but dimwits like you are.
Those are america's problems
on
American Nerd
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
excuse me if that sounds discriminative, but it is as such.
in other countries there arent such distinctions as 'nerds' etc, or such kind of school bullying culture.
lets take turkey for example. in turkey if you are a nerd and its obvious, your future is guaranteed. you are taken as a good student, and everyone treats you accordingly. leave aside the respect you'll be getting in family circles, in school everyone knows your place, and how your place in future will be. this doesnt put you into the 'in' crowd, - there are 'popular' or 'in' crowds in every culture -, but it wont put you out either. you dont get bullied, harrassed or despised.
and stuff unfolds as they predicted generallly - you score top scores in nation-wide university entrance exams, get into a top university (there are 4 major universities here which send graduates to oxford, m.i.t. and similar), and when you graduate from there, you dont even probably stay in a single country, but rather become a top official in a global corporation.
what i know from a number of other countries is that situation is more or less similar to this, around europe. this makes me think that this 'nerd' issue, nerd bullying etc are exclusively american issues.
if your definition of 'good business' is this, removing competition by tail maneuvering and deceptive proceedings, without producing ZIT that would benefit the society, the most elaborate, intellectual and well argumentated thing i can say as a response to you is;screw you;.
people thinking like you are making the world a shitty place to live in.
Slashdot Mirror
you're a horrible, horrible man/woman.
but, HOW many times ?
you had given a link containing a lot of psychotic behaviour belonging to you. kudos. i wouldnt be able to find it myself if i had tried to, but since you havent been able to get over it and still keep the link to it handy, i dont even need to. you will be there for me, providing the link.
thank you. oh and by the way, i loved your parent comment too, a lot of insults, a lot of aggression. trademark.
what is football and hockey after all ?
you just sit in front of a tv, and passively watch OTHER people playing a game.
with computer games, at least YOU get to play the game.
where should they have fit in ?
working 7 to 19.00 every day, in a thankless job that demands way more than it pays ?
or, they should have fit in sleazy bar corners, wasting their life away with sluts (male or female) ?
or, they should become career bitches (male or female) and waste their life away in that manner ?
or they should have fit in with a family. but then again, they have to create a family first, and creating a family has SO much overhead and effort in these days that you can maybe compare it to swimming across english channel.
or, they should have fit in with the immense crowds that are sedating their brain through football spectatorship, or in front of dumb tv shows each night ?
or maybe they could have fit in with their peers, who are entertaining themselves with the MODERN entertainment form that is called gaming ? you know, fitting in WITH YOUR PEERS, as countless generations in the history of mankind has done ?
well. they are just doing that. i think a lot of people, but especially 'experts' need to shut their traps about it, and get to accept this as a normal stage of human civilization.
shove your taxes up your butt. you americans are WAY too obsessed with your money. 'taxpayer money taxpayer money taxpayer money'.
you make an effect on other inhabitants of the world that forces them to say 'fuck your taxpayer money'.
try to become less self centered. youre not the only people in the world paying taxes.
and really, fuck your taxpayer money.
if you dont want to pay taxes, withdraw to a fuckin mountain top, and live as a hermit, and let go of all perks being a society brings.
if you cant let go of what being a society brings, shut the fuck up and pay your taxes.
geeez.
For, its practically simple as this ; 'dont do anything you wouldnt like to others'.
prison sentence ? cash penalty ? public service ? all irrelevant to this crime.
but, subjecting them to the same treatment, is up to the point.
punishing individuals with penalties irrelevant to their crime havent accomplished much to this point. before criticizing something with nonsense, you should get your argument together first, but do it with observation.
where all kind of ethical lacking, greed, bastardliness goes around. they would be exploited to hell.
cloning and bringing to life a lost specie is like having a child. only a responsible civilization that is past preliminary stages of being a responsible society should be allowed to.
im frequently donating to EFF for such lawsuits. i wonder if they are gonna go into this one too.
microsoft ever wrong. or in wrongdoing.
Fix all chairs in the courtroom to the ground with steel bolts !
take oscommerce. there are already zillions of modules out there, for every kind of task you can imagine to extend its functions, leave aside itself being a full fledged estore software.
but, leave aside axing business, this is actually creating a lot more business.
no 2 businesses are exactly the same. as a developer who works on commercial oscommerce mod and support, you cant imagine what kind of modifications businesses may ask to get done. you'd say 2 businesses were exactly the same if you check out their composition, but, one comes and wants something done, and the other wants same thing done, but a slight modification, which is very important to them. not only that but all businesses are trying to modify and change their offerings to do better business. or, hell, even the integrations in between different estores performing different functions (wholesale outlet, retail outlet, need to maintain different branding) can create huge projects.
of course, estores is an area that is open to many modification. it may not reflect as the same in each and every kind of software application field.
but, even if modding isnt, support is something that can never go away. when businesses need support, they need it fast, they need it good. any business doing acceptable levels of profits will be requiring decent support from a professional conduct company.
put hillary for secretary of state. despite what hillary says, noone outside america takes her seriously. and that 'no way no how' kind rhetoric doesnt work in international politics.
he is thinking of neocon national security chief in place. unbelievable.
and now this. an idiot who tried to fool courts into preventing free speech on the internet, is for attorney general.
what's next step ? mugabe for human rights czar ?
dont get me wrong, i support obama. but this going is not good.
the more such organizations post crap like this, the lesser my respect for that political viewpoint becomes.
it appears that libertarian view is becoming a refuge for the shysters that screwed entire world through the 'let everything be' preaching of holistic economists, since republican party is down in fortunes these days.
DONT accept them into your view. they will screw not only you, but entire world, again, if you let them.
the 'free market' was supposed to ensure fair competition and fair share in television and radio broadcasting, and printed media too.
did it deliver?
no.
in all countries, more than half of the publications and broadcasts belong to 1-2 cartels, which are generally aligned with a particular political party, and they ensure that the persons who will support their own ends will get elected.
the 'free market' was going to assure fair competition in finance world and would regulate it itself, according to alan fucking greenspan.
did it deliver ?
yes it delivered. it delivered RIGHT up to our butt. we are STILL on the opening stages of the crisis.
just a month ago the proponent of that sermon came up in front of u.s. senate and admitted to his fault, said that he couldnt believe what happened.
he knows what happened, we know what happened. CEOS, high level executives, shareholders are people too. there are crooks, bastards, irresponsibles, slackers, shysters, all kinds among them. there are those among them who wouldnt hesitate from breaking ENTIRE global economy to reap benefits.
thats the human factor.
human factor is there at the controlling helms of the internet connectivity providers too. which, not surprisingly generally belong to big cartels that own already trivialized broadcasting and printed media.
one would be utterly stupid as to think that repetition of what happened in financial sector is not possible.
lets try this again, the correct way :
......
.......
somehow IRS's reaction just happened to coincide with the aftermath of yahoo escapade, and right before the neocon administration leaves power, which will ultimately leading to replacement of many high level bureaucrats on top of controlling agencies.
and RIGHT at the time yahoo issue resurfaced
hmmmmm
thats not traffic shaping, thats violating the contract.
internet is not your local ma&pa shop or small business.
...
internet affects A LOT of things. leave aside entertainment, a lot of services that are serving vital functions of the society ranging from companies serving in security areas to health industry, even many local and national government organizations run a lot of services for performing the daily tasks they are responsible with.
no, internet, no part of it can be anyone's backyard, anyone's 'own property'. its VERY vital and VERY public, VERY STRATEGICAL to be allowed to.
think of the land ownership concept. are landowners allowed to do anything on their property, because they bought them or leased them ? what if i wanted to fill all the land i own with dung ? or what if i decided to feed wild wolves in it ? or god forbid, what if i decided to declare my own little kingdom's independency ?
seems far fetched ? it isnt. until 150 years ago or so, there werent laws that are preventing individuals or companies from buying land larger than a certain size.
if you let an individual buy enough land, that land would eventually have the capability to sustain itself in regard to all needs and services, from mining to agriculture, and therefore could easily be independent of the nation it was in. think - everyting belonging to one man or company in an area the size of california. or scotland. or ireland
so to prevent this, laws were made. in modern countries, you cant buy more than a certain defined area of land.
internet is no different than land. noone has the right to close a portion and do whatever they please on it.
microsoft has much more to lose than apple, concerning google and firefox. AND, they are on the retreat and decline at all fronts, even including OS front, after the even microsoft confirmed failure that vista has been.
on a sinking ship like this, the sentiment to find a scapegoat, a target, something to take vengeance on is sought generally. and microsoft's corporate culture is no mother theresa.
if its one incident, its fear mongering.
if its more than one consecutive incidents in close pursuit, one needs to be totally stupid not to realize something fishy is going on.
so, sue me ?
back in the yahoo story a few days ago, i told that it smelled microsoft all over, and then modded to oblivion and yanked with replies defending microsoft, saying there was NO wrongdoing on microsoft's part, despite the investigation was started by DOJ, which is still populated with the neocon administration which has been WAY chummy with microsoft.
now, suddenly, IRS gets in the picture, and on the target there a major competitor and a major headache for microsoft. despite there are numerous open source software using same kind of deal with various corporations for funds, somehow, for some reason, its google+mozilla that irs feels the need to investigate.
of course, that again has no relation to microsoft, which is best pals with the neocon administration still in power. the thing is just a coincidence.
there are nobody over me with the power to stop me from crying, therefore if i want to cry over anything, i can.
not being an american, i dont have to suffer your society's shortcomings and negative attitude towards emotions and the havoc that wreaks in your psychological health in later stages of your lives.
and in addition, being free to do as such, im NOT dealing with it, and accusing microsoft of wrongdoing in this event.
doesnt need proof tho. they stopped short of a hostile takeover when they calculated that that would shatter their reputation pr wise. microsoft is not denying that. but dimwits like you are.
excuse me if that sounds discriminative, but it is as such.
in other countries there arent such distinctions as 'nerds' etc, or such kind of school bullying culture.
lets take turkey for example. in turkey if you are a nerd and its obvious, your future is guaranteed. you are taken as a good student, and everyone treats you accordingly. leave aside the respect you'll be getting in family circles, in school everyone knows your place, and how your place in future will be. this doesnt put you into the 'in' crowd, - there are 'popular' or 'in' crowds in every culture -, but it wont put you out either. you dont get bullied, harrassed or despised.
and stuff unfolds as they predicted generallly - you score top scores in nation-wide university entrance exams, get into a top university (there are 4 major universities here which send graduates to oxford, m.i.t. and similar), and when you graduate from there, you dont even probably stay in a single country, but rather become a top official in a global corporation.
what i know from a number of other countries is that situation is more or less similar to this, around europe. this makes me think that this 'nerd' issue, nerd bullying etc are exclusively american issues.
if your definition of 'good business' is this, removing competition by tail maneuvering and deceptive proceedings, without producing ZIT that would benefit the society, the most elaborate, intellectual and well argumentated thing i can say as a response to you is ;screw you;.
people thinking like you are making the world a shitty place to live in.