Slashdot Mirror


Gaming In Sweden Bigger Than Football and Hockey

An anonymous reader writes "SIFO (a major Swedish survey company) has conducted a gaming survey right before the launch of Dreamhack Winter. One of the results is that gaming is bigger than football and hockey combined."

252 comments

  1. Which one though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't understand, which one, EA Sports or Pro Evolution Soccer?

    --
    If you mod me as off topic you just didn't get it

  2. Seen it coming by tripdizzle · · Score: 1

    Cant get to the article from work, but is there anyone out there that has not seen this coming?? Anyone can pick up a controller and play a game, where it actually takes some time and effort to learn to skate.

    --
    "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." Hayek
    1. Re:Seen it coming by tripdizzle · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And for the football reference, are they referring to actual football, or soccer??

      --
      "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." Hayek
    2. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are referring to actual football a.k.a. soccer.

      There is also a wimpy other side of the atlantic "sport" called "american football" which just is a bad copy of rugby (which is much more brutal than american football since you dont wear any wimpy padding). Though, you are not actually kicking on the ball with your feet in american football, so why it is called football no one actually knows.

    3. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any mention of 'football' outside the US means proper football i.e. soccer. Noticing the report came from Sweden should have indicated which to most people i.e. not Americans who probably think Sweden is where re-made home videos come from.

      Ironically most people think that soccer is an American term to refer to football, whereas it actually comes from the phrase 'association football'.

    4. Re:Seen it coming by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know it's popular to hate on American football because it's American, but the types of hits and tackles legal in the NFL would mean half a rugby team would be paralyzed by the end of the season.

      Add to that, the plays of the NFL are much more intricate... the NFL is more of a tactical contest between coaches than probably any other professional sport.

    5. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you actually knew any history about football, you would know that the "foot" in "football" has absolutely zero to do with kicking. It has to do with the fact that it's played on foot, as opposed to other historical games that were played on horseback. Football's origins go back much further than any other modern sport (possibly as far as the last century BC), hence why the term "football" still applies, even though under the original broad definition, basketball and baseball would also qualify. Neither Soccer nor American Football is close to how "real" football was originally played in most places, that honor goes to Rugby. (Although both Soccer and American Football do have roots going back for enough, it's impossible to say *for sure* that there weren't certain places that played with similar rules. Rugby just most closely resembles the most popular form of the game.) The only significant thing American Football added that wasn't there since the beginning is downs, and a turnover or punt due to not being able to gain a certain amount of yards in a certain amount of downs (first put into place in 1882). Soccer changed the game altogether. Yes, American Football is just as close or closer to how the game was originally played than Soccer is.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    6. Re:Seen it coming by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      In what way does it come from the phrase 'association football'?!

    7. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slang abbreviation of the word "association".

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    8. Re:Seen it coming by Cyrcyr · · Score: 0

      Association. Assoc. 'Soc. Soccer. Tadaaa. :)

    9. Re:Seen it coming by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know it's popular to hate on American football because it's American

      I don't hate it because it's American, I hate it because it's boring. I actually tried watching it for a while and I found that it consists mostly of commercials, with short bursts of football in between. If they would just get on with playing instead of having constant advertisement filled breaks it might be more interesting.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    10. Re:Seen it coming by DeadManCoding · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One answer... Bwahahahah!!! Half a rugby team paralyzed? That's seriously a joke. NFL players are over-pampered, overpaid wimps compared to the rest of the world. It's one of the few sports that somehow manages to encourage overweight athletes. Take a look at those guts and tell me again that they're in shape.

      And yes, I am American, I played actual football, aka soccer. It has just as much physical contact, significantly more demanding on the body, and requires a huge amount of stamina. Do me a favor, go run for 45 minutes, take a 10 minute, and run for another 45 minutes. I'd love to see those NFL athletes have heart attacks over that one...

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    11. Re:Seen it coming by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Watch a college game sometime (Penn State!).

      They move along quite rapidly.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    12. Re:Seen it coming by polar+red · · Score: 1

      they tried(when the world cup was in the us) to cripple soccer in the same way : 4 quarters in stead of 2 halves.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    13. Re:Seen it coming by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see any soccer player (even in pads) take a hit from an NFL player and get up.

      Oh, wait... he'd fall over if someone even ran close to him.

      Different skill sets, bud. NFL players are built for power and quick speed, soccer players are built for stamina. You take either out of their element, and they'll falter.

    14. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your problem is more with American tv than football.

    15. Re:Seen it coming by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I thought Sweden was where all the cute blondes come from.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    16. Re:Seen it coming by guga31bb · · Score: 1

      Oops I misclicked so I'm replying to clear my Redundant mod. I am American and couldn't agree more - the ratio of action to commercials is disturbingly low. It becomes even more apparent when going to a game - every few plays all the players go head to the sidelines and stand around, waiting for commercials to end. If I were a player, that would drive me crazy!

    17. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if they're playing Iowa...

      Oh snap *

    18. Re:Seen it coming by xorsyst · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try playing both Rugby and American football and then comment. They are both physically tough, but in different ways. As for the padding, that is mostly aggressive. It allows you to hit (and be hit) harder. To say one is a wimpy form of the other is, well, flamebait.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    19. Re:Seen it coming by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Do me a favor, go run for 45 minutes, take a 10 minute, and run for another 45 minutes. I'd love to see those NFL athletes have heart attacks over that one...

      Plus diving legs-first (rather than shoulders/padding) into a high-speed tackle whilst actually trying to get a ball... cause, you know, sometimes this happens: ouch

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    20. Re:Seen it coming by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Hi! It looks like you're unfamiliar with a dictionary. Do you want some help with that? </clippy>

    21. Re:Seen it coming by sqldr · · Score: 1
      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    22. Re:Seen it coming by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rugby gets its name because it is as entertaining as receiving a rugburn.

      Well, you know, a lot of the common ways one might receive a rug burn are well worth it...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    23. Re:Seen it coming by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Don't mix football with the american version of football that's more a sub-division of rugby.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    24. Re:Seen it coming by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know it's popular to hate on American football because it's American, but the types of hits and tackles legal in the NFL would mean half a rugby team would be paralyzed by the end of the season

      I'm gonna have to call bull shit on that one. I have sneaking suspicion you never actually watched a professional rugby game before. There is little difference between the severity of the hits and tackles. In fact, I definitely see more blood and injuries with rugby. Also, the play doesn't always end when you get hit/tackled and rugby. American football players generally get a good 20 second rest. American football is pretty much rugby with much more resting.

    25. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you come from where did you go
      Where did you come from Cotton-Eye Joe

    26. Re:Seen it coming by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IAAARP (I am a American Rugby Player)

      Rugby tackles can be just as hard however they typically aren't, why?
      1) After a rugby tackle there isn't a whistle. There isn't a TV Time Out or a play clock. You either have to pick, ruck, or roll
      2) There is no padding. NFL Players constantly use their padding as armor or a weapon. It's like saying I can hit people harder with a baseball bat than with my fist. No shit, there's less possibility of self damage with the baseball bat.

      And your argument of "tactical contest between coaches" makes it sound more like a mindless game of chess. (Which I'm not arguing that it's not). Every single rugby player has to be able to make split second decisions and see the entire field.

      Third, the type of game that Rugby is would leave most NFL players on the sidelines gasping for air.
      1) NFL games are split up between 2 teams (Offense and Defense) that rotate out roughly every 4 plays. Rugby usually has 1-2 subs at most. Meaning all 15 players per team are on the field during the entire match.
      2) NFL regulation matches are 4 quarters-15 minutes long. However this is usually spread out over 3ish hours. Rugby is 80 minutes spread out over roughly 90 minutes. (10 minute halftime).

      Finally, I suggest you watch some stuff on youtube. There are plays and combinations that make the NFL look like tic-tac-toe.

      You'll teach a bunch of Rugby players to play American Football much easier than vice versa.

    27. Re:Seen it coming by viper34j · · Score: 1

      If you actually knew any history about football, you would know that the "foot" in "football" has absolutely zero to do with kicking. It has to do with the fact that it's played on foot, as opposed to other historical games that were played on horseback. Football's origins go back much further than any other modern sport (possibly as far as the last century BC), hence why the term "football" still applies, even though under the original broad definition, basketball and baseball would also qualify. Neither Soccer nor American Football is close to how "real" football was originally played in most places, that honor goes to Rugby. (Although both Soccer and American Football do have roots going back for enough, it's impossible to say *for sure* that there weren't certain places that played with similar rules. Rugby just most closely resembles the most popular form of the game.) The only significant thing American Football added that wasn't there since the beginning is downs, and a turnover or punt due to not being able to gain a certain amount of yards in a certain amount of downs (first put into place in 1882). Soccer changed the game altogether. Yes, American Football is just as close or closer to how the game was originally played than Soccer is.

      How does Australian Rules Football play into this? I've seen a few games and it just looks like a 36-man version of smear-the-queer...

    28. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NFL players are over-pampered, overpaid wimps...

      just the quarterbacks. cant take a hit without someone getting fined for it.

      ...compared to the rest of the world

      i agree, nfl players are pretty wimpy compared to some starving children in some 3rd world country. miss a meal everyone once in a while you wimps

    29. Re:Seen it coming by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having high bodyfat does not necessarily translate to being out of shape. In most cases "fat" people are also in poor physical condition, but not always. I do crossfit-like training, and there's a guy at the training house I go to who has a distinct pot belly and will regularly outperform about 80% of the people who go there at just about any kind of exercise, whether it's heavy lifting or the brutal anaerobic endurance workouts we do. And it's not because the rest of the folks are all in crappy shape, either.

    30. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see any soccer player (even in pads) take a hit from an NFL player and get up.

      Oh, wait... he'd fall over if someone even ran close to him.

      Different skill sets, bud. NFL players are built for power and quick speed, soccer players are built for stamina. You take either out of their element, and they'll falter.

      "NFL players are built for power and quick speed,"
      that's because 90% of them have spent their whole life running from the police.
      National Felons League...

    31. Re:Seen it coming by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      American football is pretty much rugby with much more resting

      Watching American football and baseball always leaves me with the feeling that popular American sports are designed around frequent advert breaks.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    32. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Reading up on it just now, Australian Rules Football also has its roots in the same big hodgepodge that comprised "football" before various regions started making official rule-sets. (Or in other words, it doesn't come from Soccer, American Football, Rugby, etc.) It's also probably closer to how football was originally played in most places than Soccer and American Football.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    33. Re:Seen it coming by sa1lnr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How many American Football players would be in the same position without their armour?

    34. Re:Seen it coming by master811 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget about the fact that it's not really Football (seeing as you hold it with your hands most of the time).

    35. Re:Seen it coming by interploy · · Score: 1

      Because american football is a derivative of rugby, whose full name is rugby football.

    36. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      aha, so soccer is just a form of football

      soccer /skr/ [sok-er] -noun a form of football played between two teams of 11 players, in which the ball may be advanced by kicking or by bouncing it off any part of the body but the arms and hands, except in the case of the goalkeepers, who may use their hands to catch, carry, throw, or stop the ball.

    37. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      asSOCiation football = SOCcer

    38. Re:Seen it coming by Blitz22 · · Score: 1

      Oh please! I've seen Rugby Football matches before and it's not really THAT much different from American football in terms of starts and stops.

      Let's see... Catch the ball after it's been kicked to you, run furiously up the field, pass the ball then he runs and finally a tackle... Now half of each team piles up and the ball gets moved around under the pile while the rest of the team stands around watching.... seconds pass... (rest) sometimes the ball does come out and they run again, other times... whistle! Now everyone stands up, walks over to organize the scrum, and once the ball comes out they run. Now say this results in a try... everyone walks to their position waiting for the kick (rest) and afterwards they gather to kick the ball back and repeat... Unless there's a penalty... Then one guy again sets up for the kick while everyone stands around looking... (rest) and another kick....

      Plenty of time for rest in Rugby, it's not a constant sprint back and forth. One nice thing about Rugby is the whole "no adverts" thing, but that's more to do with Madison Avenue and Networks here overpaying for broadcasting rights than the game itself.

      While there may be more breaks in American Football the difference doesn't seem as stark as I understand you are trying to state. This is true of Assoc. Football too, there are plenty of breaks in the action in most games, with a few exceptions. (99 FA Cup Semifinal at Villa Park, wow! what a game!)

      --
      If I went around claiming I was an emperor...they'd put me away!
    39. Re:Seen it coming by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I don't hate it because it's American, I hate it because it's boring. I actually tried watching it for a while and I found that it consists mostly of commercials, with short bursts of football in between. If they would just get on with playing instead of having constant advertisement filled breaks it might be more interesting.

      Well, the same is true for hockey.

      I got tickets to a corporate box a bunch of years ago to watch a pro-hockey game. Now, I'm no expert on hockey, but then they were all skating around in circles and apparently doing nothing concerning a puck, I asked what was happening -- apparently, they were in a TV timeout.

      NHL hockey stops game play when they cut to commercial.

      If it's in North America, and it's televised the commercial interests trump the sport. I don't know if they all stop or not.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    40. Re:Seen it coming by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I will second this, my pot belly comes from my love of micro brews. I stand about 6'6" and weigh 280 currently. I bike frequently, can run a 10K with a decent time easy. Of course right now I have some tendonitis in my knees so I have to wait until that heals but I could probably still outrun most of my co-workers with enough painkillers...But then again, I am in the IT world so that is not saying much.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    41. Re:Seen it coming by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      Canadian Football is a faster paced version of American Football. I don't like the sport in either variety myself, but just saying, some people like Canadian football more because the plays are longer, there are less downs, and over all it just progresses faster.

      If you want to talk about a slow national sport, look at baseball. The sport has immense history in the US, but it is painfully slow.

      Soccer football I'm not a fan of either. It is much faster paced, but not as brutal. Never watched rugby, but so far my favorite sport (being canadian and all) is hockey. It has the roughness and strategy of football, powerful history like baseball (even more so in Canada than the US, even EVEN MORE SO since Montreal is home to one of the most famous teams in north american sports history), and ferocious speed and heart stopping plays. Plays can last what seems like an eternity, long enough that players are switched around in mid play.

      Personally, while every mainstream sport has passionate fans and players, I think hockey has the most passion, at least in Canada.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    42. Re:Seen it coming by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      The whole "tactical contest between coaches" is why (American) football is one of the only sports I find interesting.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    43. Re:Seen it coming by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Insightful
      American football players would be gasping for air because they are not accustomed to playing an aerobic sport. Rugby is an aerobic sport - NFL football is an anaerobic one. Entirely different types of conditioning and muscles are required. Not better or worse - just different.

      I play one aerobic sport quite seriously (football aka soccer). I find that aerobic sports (and quasi-aerobic sports, such as volleyball) tend to be more fun to play. On the other hand, i find that they are generally rather dull to watch as the strategic intricacies are largely removed. You may talk about split-second strategic awareness that a rugby player might have and i could spill equivalent verbage about soccer. However, the reality is that while there is some sort of beauty about so many minds independently and in real time coming up with collective "brilliant" solutions to sports problems (such as scoring a goal or a try), such decisions are far less cerebral than those you get in american football and baseball.

      Or, to put it another way, you typical rugby match on TV looks like a physical contest. The team that is fitter and more skillful usually wins. Or, rather, that's how it is for soccer and certainly that's how it looks on tv for ruggers. Real time "strategic" or tactical decisions in soccer are nearly nil. Who to substitute and what formation to play are mostly it. there are a few set pieces, but they are of secondary importance.

      Baseball is a perfect strategic game. It's incredibly mathematical and lends itself to all sorts of analysis that is simply not possible in soccer. In soccer, "players working together" comes down i'd say 80% to personalities and at most 20% to complementary skills - such as having somebody with a good cross paired with somebody who is good in the air. In baseball, the situation is reversed. Sure, personality matters somewhat as it does in any sport, but players skills can be matched (both teammates and opponents) on far more levels. there are literally thousands of decisions that go into any baseball game that can be reviewed and discussed intelligently. In soccer there are maybe a handful.

      So, I love soccer. I train 3 times per week on the pitch and gym most other days. But, other than picking up some ideas for my own game, I find it incredibly tedious to watch. Baseball and american football stimulate the intellect far more and builds far better dramatic finales because of this. Plus, the games are better structured. Maybe 3 televised soccer matches in 20 are still interesting and plausibly competitive in the last 5 minutes. I'd say at least 5-6 out of 20 baseball games and 13-14 american football games out of 20 could make similar claims.

    44. Re:Seen it coming by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you want to talk about a slow national sport, look at baseball. The sport has immense history in the US, but it is painfully slow.

      Here we invented a sport that lasts five days, and usually lose to the Australians at it.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    45. Re:Seen it coming by Leafheart · · Score: 1

      I play American Football and used to play Rugby. What I can say is:

      American Football is much easier to learn. Too player centric (instead of team), and overcoached. It is more of a play between the 2 coach teams using their players as pawns, and bishops, etc, than about team work

      American Football is easier on the player. As you said, you rest. A LOT.

      American Football has too many silly rules for nothing. And another bunch just because of all the protection.

      I wish I could mod you up AND reply at the same time.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    46. Re:Seen it coming by fredcai · · Score: 1

      Its called football for the same reason "soccer" is called football, because it's played on foot (as opposed to being played on horses). Rugby football is just called rugby because the rules were formalized in Rugby. Soccer is called such because the English decided it was cool to add '-er' to the end of words in the 1800s, so association football became 'assor-er'. This is also why rugby is occasionally called rugger.

    47. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also realize that in American Football you hit a lot differently than in Rugby, right?

      I guarantee you, and I will put money on it, that if a professional football player hit you at full speed and with all his force, without padding, you would die. Period.

      So sure, they have padding, but you ignore the fact that they hit harder, possibly because you are ever so desperately trying to show that your peen is larger than anyone elses solely because you prefer a different sport.

      Congratulations. You have convinced us that you are precisely the equivalent of a dude in a Hummer.

    48. Re:Seen it coming by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      The style of hits and level of effort is completely different. Football/soccer/rugby are all intense, but different. The game has grown around the equipment and the rules. An unpadded rugby or soccer player simply cannot take the level of hits a fully padded American football lineman can.
      Likewise, an American football player cannot sustain the continuous level of effort a soccer player can. He'd keel over after 15 minutes.
      Likewise, a soccer player cannot sustain for 45 minutes the level of effort an American football player does for 8 seconds, then rest.

      All different, but just as intense.

    49. Re:Seen it coming by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Informative

      False.

      There are three commercial breaks per period, for 30 seconds. 30 seconds. They are not taken while play is ongoing. They only occur after play stops due to a puck leaving the playing surface or a penalty (though not for icing). If no one is penalized (including offsides, puck leaving the playing surface / touching the netting), then it is very possible that the commercial break won't even be taken. They do not whistle play dead in the middle of it just to get a commercial in.

      My guess is you just weren't paying very much attention.

    50. Re:Seen it coming by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is a more or less accurate, but rather misleading summary. What you call "real" football was unruly mayhem. It wasn't an organised or codified sport. And the idea that it was called "football" because it was played on foot is plausible, but as far as I know is only a theory.

      The first codified form of football was association football, which later was informally called "soccer" by the English upper-class college crowd (the term soccer was hated by the English lower-class because they thought it was a snobbish upper-class word; now they hate it because they think it is an American word).

      From association football evolved rugby football (invented at Rugby University), which spread and evolved into American/Canadian/Australian football. Being a newer form of football, the rules for rugby weren't as well known or adhered to by the sailors who spread it, so local variations arose.

      Association football was popular in the US, but the Americans then learnt the rugby style game from Canadian college students. The US Big Five ivy league colleges then voted on which form of the game to officially adopt, and it was 3-2 in favour of the rugby style. From there, American football grew to become the dominant form in the States, and soccer has been playing catch-up there ever since.

      Man, this is like the old days in rec.sport.soccer, so I might as well dust off the old sig...

      Alan Douglas
      Soccer Guy/

    51. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so that excuses them from falling on the ground and wailing like a banshee if someone so much as looks at them cross-eyed?

      Soccer players are pussies. I don't care if they have decent stamina - I guarantee you there are other sports where players need more stamina (hell, the Ironman triathlon, for example). But they go down faster than your mother after she had a pint. And for some reason this is seen as a good thing; gamesmanship, I believe I heard it called.

      I call it vaginal extract.

      Rugby is worthy of respect, but they are tackled utterly different than in the NFL. If someone tried to tackle in Rugby like they tackle in American Football, with pads, they would quickly end up dead (either the person tackling or the person being tackled - either or).

      That's not to say one or the other is more hardcore. Damn near ripping someone's ear off in a scrum is pretty hardcore. But I guarantee you if you got hit by a 280 pound linebacker at full speed and you weren't wearing pads, you would have massive internal injuries, broken bones, etc. It's just going to happen. If you want, we can figure out precisely how much force is being generated and build a machine that will mimic it and you can stand in front of it and accept the hit. We'll call it science. Mythbusters style.

      It should be fun! Except for the broken bodies part. But medical science has advanced pretty far, they can put in a few titanium rods and graft chunks of bone from your hip wherever you need it. And if you have to sit on dialysis for a while, well, it really is all in the name of science.

    52. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to do with the fact that it's played on foot, as opposed to other historical games that were played on horseback.

      Other excellent examples are footarchery (also known as footarrow), footcricket, footbasketball, foottennis, footcroquet, and two of the fencing weapons: footfoil and footepee.

    53. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For the record, soccer got its name from an abbreviation of one of the two football leagues created back in the split between football and rugby. Specifically, rugby was called League Football, and soccer was called Association Football. Association got shortened to Assoc., which then got bastardized to soccer.

    54. Re:Seen it coming by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      My guess is you just weren't paying very much attention.

      While I can't definitely tell you what initiated the TV timeout, when I turned to my co-workers for an explanation they said it was a TV timeout. (Me, I am not a hockey fan and the tickets were free -- I just turned and said "WTF are they doing now??")

      I'm sure there is some measurable rule which defines how it's done, it just wasn't obvious to me and I didn't know such a thing existed.

      According to wiki:

      Television timeouts are taken at the first stoppage of play after 6, 10, and 14 minutes of elapsed time unless there is a power play or the first stoppage is the result of a goal. In these cases, the timeout will occur at the first stoppage after the penalty expires or the next stoppage after the goal, respectively. A new rule was introduced for the 2007-08 season that if the first stoppage of play is an icing, the TV timeout does not occur.

      Which, to me, reads kinda like the rules for Fizzbin. ;-)

      All I'm saying is there are TV timeout in the game, likely even the three you detailed. Maybe not for every commercial break, but they do halt game play specifically for commercials at some points in the game.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    55. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      That is a more or less accurate, but rather misleading summary. What you call "real" football was unruly mayhem. It wasn't an organised or codified sport. And the idea that it was called "football" because it was played on foot is plausible, but as far as I know is only a theory.

      Guess that depends on what you mean by the various terms you use. There were rules, they were just different from one town to the next.

      The first codified form of football was association football, which later was informally called "soccer" by the English upper-class college crowd (the term soccer was hated by the English lower-class because they thought it was a snobbish upper-class word; now they hate it because they think it is an American word).

      From association football evolved rugby football (invented at Rugby University), which spread and evolved into American/Canadian/Australian football. Being a newer form of football, the rules for rugby weren't as well known or adhered to by the sailors who spread it, so local variations arose.

      The first part of that is definitely true. However, those "first codified rules" were soon changed pretty drastically. Those original rules specifically did not require players to only kick or hit the ball. It could be carried. The big change resulting in Soccer as we know it today didn't come until 15 years later, which is when Rugby officially came into being; it was started by people who didn't like that change in the rules. Australian Rules Football officially began during that span as well, but was truly its own thing and was not an offshoot of Association Football.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    56. Re:Seen it coming by rdavidson3 · · Score: 0

      Try the Canadian version. I enjoy a lot more than the American version, unfortunately the season just ended on the weekend.

      http://www.cfl.ca/

    57. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rugby and American footballs are for wimps. Real men play Florentine Football (Calcio Fiorentino).

    58. Re:Seen it coming by genghisjahn · · Score: 1

      Because in the early days of the game, before the forward pass was legal, the ball was advanced by foot...thus the name football. European football got its name because they kick it (most of the time) with their feet. Two different orgins to the same word that attempt to describe a sport. It happens.

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    59. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. There is very little non-incidental physical contact in soccer (more for the goalie, if you're playing with a bunch of hooligans), whereas the entire point of football is physical contact. Also, the GP is correct - football hits are illegal in rugby. The lack of a helmet to use as a weapon would make the worst of them impossible anyway, I guess. Incidentally, I've play (and occasionally play) both and the difference between football and soccer is sort of like the difference between wind sprints and a fartlek workout. Football has a lot more rest but when it's not, you're going 100%. Soccer has less 100%, but you're always going somewhat.

    60. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many sports called football, in parts of Ireland it means one thing, at the Rugby school it means another, in Australia it means a third thing, in America a fourth and in Canada a fifth, etc.

      Don't be such a chauvinist.

    61. Re:Seen it coming by sfcat · · Score: 1

      There was once a famous Australian rules football player that came to the NFL to be a punter. He was a great punter. But he would try to cover his own punts despite the advice of everyone around him. In his third game, he was knocked unconscious and quit the team about 5 seconds after being woken up with smelling salts. But whatever you want to believe is fine. Guess pads don't protect you as much as you think.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    62. Re:Seen it coming by ted.hansson · · Score: 1

      This was especially interesting to see when it was first introduced in the World Cup, late '90s I think. Swedish television didn't show commercials during these breaks, so we got to see the players standing around for a minute before continuing the game.

    63. Re:Seen it coming by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Those original rules specifically did not require players to only kick or hit the ball. It could be carried.

      No it couldn't; it could be caught, but not carried or thrown with the hands. The original rules can be seen here. Rugby Football didn't evolve from Association Football; all sorts of football rules were played around the same time. Rugby just codified their rules after seeing the advantage that the schools involved with the FA had gained from it when playing against each other (and as other schools dropped their own versions of football to use the published rules).

      There were many offshoots of Rugby Football (aka "rugger" as compared with "soccer"), American Football being one of them. As they added new regulations and changed the form of play significantly it's quite right that their version of Rugby Football should be known as American Football.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    64. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't hate it because it's American, I hate it because it's boring. I actually tried watching it for a while and I found that it consists mostly of commercials, with short bursts of football in between. If they would just get on with playing instead of having constant advertisement filled breaks it might be more interesting.

      There are no arbitrary TV time outs in football. There are commercials during time outs, end of quarter, and after a score. If you're used to watching soccer, this may be a shock to you as there is actual scoring in american football over here instead of 90 minutes (plus penalty time) of running followed by penalty kicks.

    65. Re:Seen it coming by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      It's not *designed* around advertisements. They just changed the rules of the game to put more advertisements in. Kind of like the difference between NHL hockey and Olympic hockey. College football and baseball have changed rules in the last couple years to make the game pass more quickly be (although they'll always average about three hours). That's because those two sports are as popular to see in person as on TV, and the NFL is primarily a TV sport. The problem is that the game clocks aren't constantly running (or in baseball it's not timed at all) so it usually benefits a team to milk as much real time out of the game clock as possible.

    66. Re:Seen it coming by initialE · · Score: 1

      And how did League Football become rugby?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    67. Re:Seen it coming by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Those "guts" that you're looking at are for linemen. There, strength and quickness are the most important abilites (in that order), running is not. Sprinting for more than twenty yards or so is pretty rare for any position, which is why receivers and defensive backs look like athletes from aerobic sports.

      At my college (Utah) we had guys that weighed 350 lbs. that were as fast for short bursts as any other athletes I'd ever met. They are still in great shape by any reasonable measure. It's like saying sumo wrestlers or weight lifters are out of shape because they can't run a marathon. Or marathoners and cyclists are out of shape because they can't lift heavy weights. They just specialize their bodies to fit their sport.

      And for you to claim that soccer has just as much physical contact, well, that's just demonstrably wrong. Soccer has occasional violent collisions and constant battling for position, but it's not even comparable to two people running head on into each other every play, while most of the other 20 people on the field are pushing each other around. Nearly every hit in the NFL would draw a yellow card in a soccer match. The only position that's really comparable would be wide receiver/db, but even then they get some extremely hard hits in at least three or four times a game.

      Specialization is not weakness. I personally would love to see an NFL linebacker clean your clock for calling him out of shape.

    68. Re:Seen it coming by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      That's not so bad. In the stanley cup playoffs for hockey, teams play a series of games in best-of-7 matches, which means that the next team to move up the roster may not be decided for a few weeks because they play all seven games. And besides, the quickest you could move up is in 4 games, 4 straight wins.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    69. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A whole thread on slashdot just to discuss about sport, I guess I should go back to sleep.

    70. Re:Seen it coming by Fritz+the+CopyCat · · Score: 1

      The code developed from the game played at Rugby School in Warwickshire, England.

    71. Re:Seen it coming by solferino · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't even try to beat cricket for slowness. Yes, a test match only runs five days. But when a side tours another country they will play a test match series. Often this will be five matches. This will extend over a couple of months. Australia and England have been playing these test match series for over 100 years. They are called The Ashes. Currently Australia leads 31 to 28.

      A five day test match can be an enthralling story to follow as it slowly develops. Immense concentration is needed throughout those five days. Lapses of concentration can result in the advantage quickly moving to the other side. In this way cricket is a gruelling psychological test that just happens to require high level sporting ability.

    72. Re:Seen it coming by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      are they playing for 5 days CONTINUOUSLY or are they playing 8 hours a day 5 days a week type of deal?

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    73. Re:Seen it coming by Forrest+Kyle · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Can't we just agree that sports suck and algorithms are cool?

    74. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      The rules you link to are not the first official Association Football rules. You're right though, in that it's a bit muddier than I realized. However, most of what I said is still accurate. The very first Association Football rules did not allow for running with the ball, but apparently somewhere along the line it got included, as that was one of the controversial rules in the 1863 official rules, which ended up being removed at that time. Which is why you don't see such a rule in any of the official rules you linked to - they only go back to 1863. That particular rule was also what caused some parties to leave Association Football at that time, and gave birth to the first official Rugby rules.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    75. Re:Seen it coming by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Correction. Those are the first Association Football rules, but they're based primarily on the Cambridge Rules, which is what I had in mind. So you're absolutely correct: Rugby (and by extension American Football) didn't come from Association Football, but they did both come from the Cambridge Rules.

      My apologies for this misinformation.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    76. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe 3 televised soccer matches in 20 are still interesting and plausibly competitive in the last 5 minutes.

      Taking last weekend's English Premier League results as a random sample, 7 of the 9 games were either ties or decided by a single goal - which I would consider "plausibly competitive" right up until the final whistle..

    77. Re:Seen it coming by lordholm · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is true, but Sweden is more. Sweden consist of a few distinct groups of people:

      * Cute blondes
      * Chefs
      * Furniture designers
      * Hockey players
      * Angry men wearing horned helmets (most of them are working as hockey players these days though, and the pillaging and looting is only done occasionally. Ahh... how I miss the good old days when you could just take your ship and go looting and burning down villages...).

      That is really all there is to this place... really... and we have polar bears walking on the streets of Stockholm during the winter which last from late July to early June (from June to July there is summer and last I looked the average temperature during the summer was almost approaching something ridiculously warm like -10 C).

      Umm... can't think of anything else... was a while ago since I left the place. The reason that I left was that I got to tired of having to fight polar bears with my bare hands on the way to and from work and that I like brunettes.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    78. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um...american football players wear those pads because they all weigh 300+ lbs and travel at near Carl Lewis speeds. a full speed, head on collision with an american footballer would probably kill or hospitalize most rugby players.

    79. Re:Seen it coming by kauttapiste · · Score: 1

      Though, you are not actually kicking on the ball with your feet in american football, so why it is called football no one actually knows.

      And it's not exactly a ball either..

    80. Re:Seen it coming by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      It has to do with the fact that it's played on foot, as opposed to other historical games that were played on horseback.

      Anyone up for some horseball? Kick the horseball! etc.

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    81. Re:Seen it coming by sqldr · · Score: 1
      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    82. Re:Seen it coming by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm going to have to disagree (though I kind of suspected somebody would try this argument). The last 5 even in draws can be horribly uncompetitive since one team may be playing for the draw and the other is pretty well tired by that point. This happens very often in football. Similarly, a 1-goal difference does not imply anywhere near the drama that a 1-run difference in baseball or 1-point (or even 3-point or 7 point) difference in american football implies. More often than not, one team has basically dominated the contest and are sitting up 1-0. Does all sport have its moments? Of course. Football has magical ones. But I think your "7 of 9" reasoning based purely on this sort of raw numbers is highly misleading. If it were any other way, "Match of the Day" would show the last 5 minutes of those matches more regularly. Instead, it's simply "and x scored in the 73rd minute and they managed to hold on the rest of the way."

    83. Re:Seen it coming by noundi · · Score: 1

      If they would just get on with playing instead of having constant advertisement filled breaks it might be more interesting.

      Truth is, we DO hate it because it's American. But it has nothing to do with Americans in general. While we're at it, please find a livestream of any Swedish TV channel and compare the rate of commercials to any American TV channel. This is a general phenomenon in the American TV industry, thus it should not be considered as unjustified stereotyping. American football exist in Sweden, it's small but it does exist. If it would hit at any time hit TV, it wouldn't be as horrible as American American football, thus we conclude that American American football is shitty simply because it's American.
      --
      Shit where shit is due.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    84. Re:Seen it coming by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I do crossfit-like training, and there's a guy at the training house I go to who has a distinct pot belly and will regularly outperform about 80% of the people who go there at just about any kind of exercise, whether it's heavy lifting or the brutal anaerobic endurance workouts we do.

      That doesn't mean he's healthy, his heart could be about to pack in for all we know. Many NFL players die in their 30s or 40s.

    85. Re:Seen it coming by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      That's all great except that there are essentially three teams on each side on football. An american football player rarely is on the field more than half of the game. As a soccer player I can tell you that those times where the ball comes off the field, and play is shortly stopped, are much needed. You really can't get away with a lack stamina conditionining in soccer like you can in football.

    86. Re:Seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It has to do with the fact that it's played on foot, as opposed to other historical games that were played on horseback."

      This is a bullshit "folk etymology" that you will see regurgitated on Wikipedia and countless other sources, but you will never find an original, period source to back up the claim.

      There were no "other historical games that were played on hoseback" in medieval England. Polo wasn't introduced into Britain until the late 19th century.

      THERE WERE NO BALL GAMES PLAYED ON HORSEBACK IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND.

      This is an old meme, probably invented by a rugby fan in the late 19th century, that only fools people who haven't studied medieval English history. It plays upon people's stereotypes about social classes in medieval times; ie, the nobles up on their high horses, and the peasants down in the muck.

      The reality is a lot more complex. Did you know that the oldest pair of football boots in existence belonged to King Henry VIII? If there was some social stigma against nobles playing games on foot, what was King Henry doing ordering a pair of football boots?

      We have plenty of primary source material from the pre-modern/early modern period indicating that football involved kicking a ball with the foot, for instance Shakespeare: "Am I so round with you as you with me, That like a football you do spurn me thus?" (spurn means to "kick away": look it up if you don't believe me).

      If you really believe that "football is a game played on foot" bullshit argument, why isn't cricket and stoolball and baseball and rounders and hockey and hurling and all the other ball games played on foot, not also called football? They are all games of ball played on foot, as opposed to horseback.

    87. Re:Seen it coming by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it wimpy. If they took the pads off in the NFL worse things would happen than with rugby. You hear this a lot but there is a big difference between being hit in football and being tackled in rugby. Even with the pads on, football often causes more damage. Whats tough about rugby is the stamina involved, not the brutality caused by a lack of padding. In a football game, an average linebacker in the NFL would take most ruby players out of the game in one hit and possibly kill them without padding and a helmet, maybe taking themselves out in the process.

    88. Re:Seen it coming by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      And I'm going to have to call BS on you. There is a big difference between the hits in American football and rugby. Players would have to be stupid not to make the adjustment. If you used American football style hits in rugby all the time you would usually do more damage to yourself than the person you are tackling. Not only would that be dangerous but it would not be as effective. And yes too many people would die or get paralyzed. Rugby players have different limitations for head and spinal impacts because of their equipment. Also the rules for how you can tackle are different. If you don't notice much of a difference than that has more to do with the visual impact the lack of NFL style padding has on your perception.

  3. They're catching up. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice to see we have some friendly competition for the coveted "Most Hours Spent Sitting on Our Arse" award. *looks around* Hmm. Why are all these people looking at me like I just ran over their dog? And at least four of them have pitchforks.

    Well, I'm going for a walk!

    *backs away slowly*

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:They're catching up. by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Computer games are an indoor sport. That it would be popular in areas that get mightily cold in winter is no surprise.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:They're catching up. by apakatt · · Score: 1

      Well I wouldn't count on it. If you read the survey / article you will find out that: "Gamers participate more in physical activity 74% of the gamers participate in physical activity compared to 61% of the population as whole."

    3. Re:They're catching up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you haven't gone out and said that _only_ areas that get mightily cold in winter have immensely popular video game followings, but your theory seems to link the two in a causal relationship.

      How would you account for South Korea, given this statement? Or Latin America (not quite as big as footy, but quite big)?

      _AC

    4. Re:They're catching up. by postbigbang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It gets cold in Korea.

      Some of the best software has been developed in cold climates, like this Finnish kid that re-wrote Minix. Torvalds....

      This is not to slime the Aussies, or anyone else. Computing is an indoor port, and so is gaming-- until a practical outdoor display works.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:They're catching up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the most likely thing to find in cold climates is heavy drinking. The US Midwesterners, the British, the Norwegians, the Russians...

    6. Re:They're catching up. by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1

      Mightily cold? Like in "we sometimes have snow for a week or two in the winter"? I think you are mixing up Sweden and Switzerland again...

      (Ok, bonus points for writing this the week we actually have snow. It'll be gone coming weekend - and next time we'll see any snow is probaly february. Yes, I am bitter, I like skiing.)

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
    7. Re:They're catching up. by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the quality of the code was good. Often it is.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:They're catching up. by ted.hansson · · Score: 1

      Well, that general opinion is skewed by the uneven population densities. People in Kiruna would probably agree that "mighty cold" is a rather accurate description, though that wouldn't show up in the statistics. But I too am slightly bitter about this. :(

    9. Re:They're catching up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_alcohol_consumption and this map: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Alcohol_consumption_per_capita_world_map.PNG

      I wouldn't say that it supports your thesis very well.. For instance, Spain is 61 places ahead of Norway. Cyprus is 12 places above Russia.

  4. By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by stardaemon · · Score: 1

    Still, not to surprising, since it's a lot easier to sit down in front of the pc or the console of you're choice and just play a game.

    --
    The only way to stay sane in an insane world, is to be mad yourself...
    1. Re:By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      No, it's really football. You play the ball with the foot, all the time. Unlike American football, where they rarely ever touch it with the foot.

    2. Re:By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is an American site. It uses American English. It's called consistency.

    3. Re:By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should watch the Lions. The ball gets touched by a foot approximately every 3 plays.

      Working out why this is so requires only a rudimentary knowledge of the rules of American football and the Lions record: 0-11.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You play the ball with the foot, all the time.

      Which has absolutely nothing to do with why it's called football.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    5. Re:By football here, the ofc mean soccer;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reference being:
      '...there is a rival explanation, which has it that football originally referred to a variety of games in medieval Europe, which were played on foot.[1] These games were usually played by peasants...'

      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football

      The idea being that the reference to foot is not that the game is played via foot contact with the ball but that it revolves around movement in the field via foot (rather than hoofing it on horseback, for instance).

      Mod up Anon!
      Maybe one day I'll get a /. account ;)

  5. It's easy to understand why by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...bigger than football and hockey combined.

    It's easy to understand why. Have you ever tried kicking a football on skates?

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
    1. Re:It's easy to understand why by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that doesn't explain why lacrosse isn't more popular.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:It's easy to understand why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSFW TGP:

      http://mrfriendly.110mb.com/

    3. Re:It's easy to understand why by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would anyone put skates on a football?

    4. Re:It's easy to understand why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't you?

    5. Re:It's easy to understand why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact I have! Seriously entertaining stuff, though you shouldn't try it without proper protection :-)

      (it was on inline skates actually, but I don't think it makes much of a difference)

    6. Re:It's easy to understand why by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 4, Funny

      Same reason you play any sport. To impress girls.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    7. Re:It's easy to understand why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make it harder to kick, duh.

  6. Nerdcore uprising by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the day far when nerds and geeks will rule the high schools, bullying and terrorizing the jocks and athletes?

    1. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Tanktalus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, no.

      Jocks and athletes have power in secondary schools simply because their ego is fed by the swooning girls who are hardwired to look for guys who can protect them. In secondary school, girls think that big, strong guys provide the daddy-style protection that they covet. It's not until later (20 to 30) that most women figure out it's the nerds that will provide the economic protection that they really want. Of course, by that time, the nerds will have picked up zero in the socialisation department and not know what to do to pick up the chicks.

    2. Re:Nerdcore uprising by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe it was just my school, but the line between "jock" and "nerd" blurred a lot. At least so much as "nerd" is defined as the smarter kids who typically do well as far as grades. Most of the top athletes at my school were actually in the top of their class (and that wasn't any fudging going on - most of them I'd known since grade school and they'd always made good grades even before athletics came into play). I myself played offensive line (Guard, though I'll admit despite being 1st string I wasn't really considered a "star player") and graduated second in my class. At least one of the guys who was a few years ahead of me graduated with honors AND had the unique distinction of never missing a single day of school from grade K through 12. Absolutely perfect attendance. He later played for both the Cleavland Browns and the Denver Broncos.

      We just didn't have that TV drama "guys with letterman jackets picking on the smart kids" thing going on. I've often wondered if that we were just an exception or if that situation plays out less often in real life than on TV.

      There was CERTAINLY a division between the athletes and the "kinda goth" (I say kinda goth because these guys were not quite as white makeup and weird as TV goths - rather some Southern goth variant), but that was pretty much separate from grades. It also was mostly just a situation where the two groups didn't associate rather than actively persecuting each other. Both groups had their smart and dumb people with about equal frequency.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no.

      Not so, my good man, the large, tall, "hench" nerds overrule your statement

    4. Re:Nerdcore uprising by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's funny how so many people seem to have gone to school on a different planet than I did ...

      I guess maybe it's how you look at things. Eleanor Roosevelt once said, "No one can make you feel inferior without your permission." I'd put it differently: whether you are an insider and outsider is a matter of perspective. If you aspire to be something you aren't cut out to be, then you're an outsider.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Nerdcore uprising by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      As young women become more independent and less restrained by traditional gender roles, this will change. In fact, it's already changing. When I went to school, there hardly any female nerds at all, and I had very litle in common with most girls. Now they seem to be everywhere and growing in numbers. While nerds always will be nerds, what was once nerdy has become mainstream and thus more accepted and understood.

      So while I don't doubt certain people work just like you say, I think far from all do. With less strict gender roles it would be even better.

    6. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, by that time, the nerds will have picked up zero in the socialisation department and not know what to do to pick up the chicks.

      Nonsense... I pickup plenty of women once I tell them about my epiced out NE Druid with full T6!

    7. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was true in my high school as well. A large portion of the football team went to ivy leauge schools (we're in Texas). The ones that didn't however either made it into 2nd or 3rd tier state colleges in a highschool with an 80% "goes on to college" rate, where most of the students head off to 1st or 2nd tier state colleges.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my experience, there's different types of girls, just like there are guys. If you want cheerleaders, then yes, you probably want to be a jock. But there's more girls in music, dance, political groups, and theater than there ever were in cheerleading (at least in both my HS and college) and they tend to look for different qualities: ability to intelligently carry on a conversation not related to D&D, emotional support, and well, being interesting.

      It's unfortunate that so many nerds tend to take the approach that just because you're good at math, you can't play violin (Einstein) or jazz saxophone (Alan Greenspan's went to Julliard for jazz sax before giving it up and going into economics). Randall Munroe is a good contemporary example.

      I'd venture if more nerds dropped the attitude of being into technology at the expense of all other interests, they'd probably have an easier time socially.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    9. Re:Nerdcore uprising by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of the top athletes at my school were actually in the top of their class (and that wasn't any fudging going on - most of them I'd known since grade school and they'd always made good grades even before athletics came into play). I myself played offensive line

      Many people on the football team thought the same thing about the team captains. I heard people saying that one of the captains should have been valedictorian because he was the smartest person they knew.

      In actuality, they didn't know the smartest kids in the school because they didn't take the same classes as those kids (myself included). If they had paid attention, they would have known that the valedictorian had done research that was being published in journals and that there were more than a dozen students (out of 200 or so) who were ahead of him academically. He obviously wasn't dumb, and he did well in school and will likely do well in life, but he wasn't at the top of the class. Like your school, there wasn't any animosity, just a lack of socialization between the groups.

    10. Re:Nerdcore uprising by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>nerds will have picked up zero in the socialisation department and not know what to do to pick up the chicks

      "Hi. My name is ______. I couldn't help noticing your beautiful smile. :-) What's your name?"

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    11. Re:Nerdcore uprising by theaveng · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry but I'm fairly certain I didn't imagine getting my glasses stolen (hidden in the teachers' desk). Or sand dumped on my head. Or my gymbag thrown into the girls' locker room.

      This isn't just a matter of "attitude" but repeated hazing. If American teachers were doing a proper job, they wouldn't turn a blind eye to this stuff, but instead intercede and punish the instigators. But because the instigators are usually "cool" jocks, they don't do a thing.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    12. Re:Nerdcore uprising by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Naah. Hench nerds still don't have the social skills, but they aren't beat up on as much by the jock types.

      It's still a broad generalization... I'm very much a nerd, but still have decent social skills. I can pretend to be mostly normal if I have to ;) But many nerds don't realize that social skills are still a skill that requires effort and time and practice to develop, just like athleticism, or video game playing, chess club, whatever.

    13. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot, buddy.

      You should have seen her face when I tried to introduce myself by saying "Hi. My name is underscore-underscore-underscore-underscore-underscore-underscore. I couldn't help noticing your beautiful smile. :-) What's your name?"

    14. Re:Nerdcore uprising by somersault · · Score: 1

      You can kind of be into tech while also being interesting - posting my digital photos on deviantArt was how I met my first gf (though I wish I hadn't - turns out she was a sucky girlfriend, and not in a good way)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Nerdcore uprising by bitrex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they tend to look for different qualities: ability to intelligently carry on a conversation not related to D&D, emotional support, and well, being interesting.

      Don't confuse traits girls may look for in a friend with traits they look for in someone they actually want to have sex with.

      The difficulty is that human beings are fantastic at self-deception, and often the qualities that a person tells you they're looking for in a mate are not really the qualities they're looking for, but are whatever allows them to think of themselves in a positive light and avoid too much cognitive dissonance. In practice, if the reality of their behavior doesn't fit with their image of themselves, it can always be rationalized later.

      In light of the constant state of self-deception that people live in (it's a fantastic evolutionarily strategy), taking advice from a woman on what she wants in someone to actually have sex with is like asking the Devil for advice on avoiding sin - it will always lead you wrong. If you want to learn, pay attention to the behavior, not the words.

    16. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say "colon-hyphen-right parenthesis" or "colon-dash-right bracket" there?

    17. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Stories like this make me wonder if I ended up going to one of the most progressive high schools in the nation... Nothing special about my school, 1500-1600 students in a town around 22k people in Ohio... I was in some geeky clubs (math, chess, french) but also lettered in soccer and baseball. Not once was I ever picked on or made fun of for my hobbies or academic success. I also never heard about anyone getting picked on because they were geeks or nerds. Of course, looking back, it seems that a good portion of the smart kids in my school also were athletic.. maybe it's something in the water to produce a breed of smart jocks (I'd guess that 15 of the top 20 in my class academically played at least 1 varsity sport)...

      I'm not doubting your story... just trying to figure out what the norm is.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    18. Re:Nerdcore uprising by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1

      I think the nerds are gonna have to start taking a lot more 'roids.

    19. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He played for the Cleveland Browns you say? No wonder he was good in school. He sucked at football. (I'm a Clevelander)

    20. Re:Nerdcore uprising by bitrex · · Score: 1

      The public school system I went to consisted of a huge number of students who had been groomed for success from an early age. They excelled in math, science, and the humanities - 98% of the graduating class went on to college, many to Ivy League universities, some to MIT, some to Stanford.

      A great number of them were also merciless sadists who took great delight in tormenting me and anyone else who was not a member of this huge clique. When they weren't passing tests in computer science with flying colors, they were slamming my face into a locker, or having their inner-city drug contacts come out to the 'burbs to break a kid's ribs for not paying up on time. Parents both actively engaged in the harassment and violence and shielded their children from any consequences through their deep connections and participation with the local school system. As I mentioned above, most of the participants went on to highly-regarded schools; they are now physicians, lawyers, professors, scientists, and engineers.

      It has nothing to do with "jock" or "nerd". It finally just comes down to ingroup outgroup politics - there is always an external threat that must be guarded against and punished, or the advantages of the ingroup become meaningless.

    21. Re:Nerdcore uprising by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a difference between your story and his is the "lettered in soccer and baseball" part, as you noticed.

      Personally, I never noticed any "Teen Movie" like hazing.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    22. Re:Nerdcore uprising by genner · · Score: 1

      I'd venture if more nerds dropped the attitude of being into technology at the expense of all other interests, they'd probably have an easier time socially.

      They'd also cease to be nerds.

    23. Re:Nerdcore uprising by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As young women become more independent and less restrained by traditional gender roles, this will change. In fact, it's already changing. When I went to school, there hardly any female nerds at all, and I had very litle in common with most girls. Now they seem to be everywhere and growing in numbers. While nerds always will be nerds, what was once nerdy has become mainstream and thus more accepted and understood."

      But, what women (and men) look for in a mate isn't really controlled largely by the intellect...but, by instinct and DNA. Even if a girl is 'nerdy'...she isn't gonna be looking for a nerdy guy as first choice...she'd still rather go with the physically fit, good looking guy (often the jock type). It is just nature at work.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:Nerdcore uprising by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my high school days. I got slammed into lockers, book bag kicked out of my hand and books notes and papers scattered down a flight of steps. Ongoing daily verbal abuse, interspersed with the odd burst of violence. Teachers and administrators did essentially nothing and when they did finally talk to one of the jerks that were beating on me, he just beat me twice as hard the next time.

      I wasn't actively trying to be different, I wasn't working at conforming either. Some people are offended and angered by "other-ness"; they probably couldn't tell you why.

      Fighting back was not an option when you are 6 inches shorter and 50 lbs lighter than your tormentors. Aside from two or three incidents of truly heinous anonymous geek revenge I just mostly tried to avoid and endure.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    25. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      You're assuming everybody "evolves" the same way. I'd like to believe that, but the jocks and the cheerleaders will always be there, because there are parents that support and encourage that behavior.

      When I was in HS, I didn't need other girls to relate to. I was happy to be friends with a bunch of geeky guys. And I still am :) I really don't feel comfortable with geek being mainstream, but I guess is because it's been an "underground thing" for so long.

    26. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Only as far as East Asia is from you...

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    27. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have studied some form of martial arts. When I was in school I was a computer geek (still am), but I also held a black belt in Aikido. I don't even think I ever had to hurt anyone, just show off a couple of moves and they left me alone. The fear of getting their ass kicked by a geek in front of their buddies was probably too great.

    28. Re:Nerdcore uprising by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      You were probably just a weird kid. Also, you were probably a douche to people that tried to talk to you. So they picked on you.

      Don't blame the teachers, it's not their job to protect you from the mean ol' bullies. Grow some balls.

    29. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You sound like you were a real pussy back then. Don't be embarrassed by anything. Just fucking do it all you pussy. Proper responses for anything genuinely damaging to you back then would include picking up a steel bat and beating the fuck out of the other idiots. Then next time use a bigger bat, and so on, until either you kill them or they stop.

    30. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no hazing and barely anything that I would call "bullying", and I ran with the second-geekiest (and easily the smartest) crowd in our high school (the geekiest were the weird-ass Wicca/LARP/OMG-no-really-guys-I-can-do-magic-with-crystals folks--seriously, WTF is up with those people?)

      We did cross-associate with a couple groups that were both non-jock but also non-geek, so maybe that helped. I dunno, it's not like we went out of our way to avoid it; it just didn't happen.

    31. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Drencrom · · Score: 1

      I think probably 2009 is the year of the nerd in high school.

    32. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you were a real pussy back then. Don't be embarrassed by anything. Just fucking do it all you pussy. Proper responses for anything genuinely damaging to you back then would include picking up a steel bat and beating the fuck out of the other idiots. Then next time use a bigger bat, and so on, until either you kill them or they stop.

      Of course violence is not the only option, but taken at a moderate level it is an appropriate response to being attacked when no other methods work. Killing them is a little much, but moderate injury might help push them into the "better not fuck with that guy" mindset. And being violent yourself you must be careful not to turn into another bully for other people.

    33. Re:Nerdcore uprising by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse traits girls may look for in a friend with traits they look for in someone they actually want to have sex with.

      This is why god invented alcohol.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    34. Re:Nerdcore uprising by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Same here. We didn't really have a 'geek group' so much as a group that didn't give a shit about groups. We attracted all the people who didn't really have their own clique. It was an interesting dynamic in and of itself.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    35. Re:Nerdcore uprising by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Many people on the football team thought the same thing about the team captains. I heard people saying that one of the captains should have been valedictorian because he was the smartest person they knew.

      In actuality, they didn't know the smartest kids in the school because they didn't take the same classes as those kids (myself included). If they had paid attention, they would have known that the valedictorian had done research that was being published in journals and that there were more than a dozen students (out of 200 or so) who were ahead of him academically. He obviously wasn't dumb, and he did well in school and will likely do well in life, but he wasn't at the top of the class.

      Noted, but in my case the smarter guys in the advanced classes often WERE a high percentage of athletes. Like I said, I was on the football team and graduated second in my class. In the top 10 there were two other football players, 2 cheerleaders, and another girl who played soccer (the valedictorian wasn't involved with sports at all, but he also flunked out of college after 1 year and last I heard was delivering newspapers for a living. Not saying there's a link there at all, but it was surprising for most of us). MOST of the better players on the football team were ranked at least in the top 50 academically (out of a graduating class just slightly larger than 350), and a lot were in the same AP and Honors classes that I was.

      Like I said, in our school most of the "smart kids" were pretty liberally mixed in with the athletics. The two weren't in any way mutually exclusive.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    36. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He later played for both the Cleavland Browns and the Denver Broncos.

      What school did you graduate 2nd in your class from?

    37. Re:Nerdcore uprising by sfcat · · Score: 1

      I probably had the highest IQ (pure left brain intelligence) in my HS and was on the football team. I never really saw football players picking on "nerds".
      My working theory on this is that our team won all the time (54-4 in 4 years) so we didn't really have frustration to take out on others. In other HSes nearby however, the jocks did pick on the nerds. But their teams sucked. So I believe that this type of behavior is just redirected frustration at losing...

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    38. Re:Nerdcore uprising by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      As a nerdy little guy the worst treatment I got was in 5th and 6th grades and NOT at the hands of the "top jock" group. It was those who might have wanted to be "top jocks" but weren't quite good enough to make it. It got toned down in 7th and 8th grades, in 8th grade a new kid (who was hispanic in almost 100% white rural school) trying to find his niche decided to pick on me. It didn't last long after I got mad enough to push him back and asked him why the heck he was picking on me since I wasn't one of the ones that was picking on him and that if he kept it up I'd break his fucking arms. (he was a kind of a jock so didn't want to lose the use of them for sports)

      A couple of months in my freshman year of high school I was subject to some shit, but that was due to others feeling inadequate themselves. That ended and then I never had a problem. I was on good terms with jocks mostly, we didn't hang out or anything but I respected their skills they respected mine. There were jocks on the "Scholastic Bowl" team as well.

    39. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If teachers don't do their job, talk to the police. If the police don't do their job, talk to the FBI. If the FBI don't do their job, take matters into your own hands.

      If you give up, the other guys have won - and you have lost. But on the other hand, you can only lose if you give up; as long as you don't give up, you can't truly lose.

      So, when in doubt... show them that they messed with the wrong people.

    40. Re:Nerdcore uprising by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      Not the nerdy girls I've known. I guess I see things differently without such strict views of the sexes.

      With nerd culture going mainstream, the fat, ugly male nerd is more and more a stereotype. I see all kinds of kids playing games nowadays. Studies have shown that gamers do more sports on average than people in general.

      As for the girls, there's no shortage of fascination with nerd girls among boys, so even if you're strictly biologist as you are, it shouldn't be too hard to meet such critera in a growing, diversifying nerd culture. If you account for less simplistic factors for picking partners, such as social and intellectual compatibility, there's no reason at all to have your dim view of things.

      Unless of course it's an american thing. It seems your jock culture is pretty unique. It's not nearly as strong here.

    41. Re:Nerdcore uprising by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      ...taking advice from a woman on what she wants in someone to actually have sex with is like asking the Devil for advice on avoiding sin - it will always lead you wrong.

      And what will taking advice on girls and sex from a Slashdotter do for you?

    42. Re:Nerdcore uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were probably just a weird kid. Also, you were probably a douche to people that tried to talk to you. So they picked on you.

      Don't blame the teachers, it's not their job to protect you from the mean ol' bullies. Grow some balls.

      Tell that to the teachers. As soon as you stand up for yourself you get suspended along with the other guy and the teachers tell you that you should have "come to them if there was a problem". Of course coming to them does nothing but get the bully angry and attract more of them to you.

      That leaves you either forced to quietly endure years of abuse from kids you would otherwise have nothing to do with; or smacking a couple of them around and hoping it's a deterrent while you spend the next week at home.

  7. It's too cold by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who wants to be outside in cold wet weather physically exerting themselves when you can be toasty and lazy sitting on the couch?

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  8. Surveys, surveys, surveys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am starting to think these surveys are worthless. For example, couldn't you also infer:

    Gamers more likely to answer surverys than sports aficionados.

    On some of these (yes, I get telephone surveys about once a month that I HANG UP ON) I have to think the results would be:

    x% of people stupid enough to answer a survey think y.

  9. F(f)ootball?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care how popular Football is over there, but if they're talking about football, now THAT is impressive.

  10. 25% of my society is sweedish by dalewj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About 25% of my online society (Hunters-unlimited.com) is sweedish and uses those funny little dots in their words. Plus one or the games we play (entropiauniverse.com) is also sweedish, They are a pleasure to play with, speaking multiple languages (for the most part). With all that extra night time in the winter they keep our soc warm.

    1. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by somersault · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's 'Swedish' by the way. At least in English it is.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by SkyratesPlayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, we don't think of it as having dots in the words. We simply have 3 more letters in the alphabet (and on the keyboard).

    3. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 3, Funny

      75% of the fish I eat are Swedish. They declined to comment.


      They will be punished.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    4. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 4, Funny

      I played a MUD called MUME in the early 90s. Swedes were also the largest chunk of non-americans playing way back then. :) That's how I learned the phrase, "tala engelska eller do!"

    5. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fish

      You're not spelling "ghoti" correctly.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghoti

    6. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure the box said Swedish.

      In a related story, researchers have discovered that the Google Translator translates "whooooosh" as "Ljudet av ett skÃmt som flyger Ãver huvudet".

      Learn something new everyday.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    7. Re:25% of my society is sweedish by Jotii · · Score: 1

      In case anyone wonders: "speak English or die", if you put two dots over the "do".

      --
      [sig]
  11. Re:On the other hand... by unixcrab · · Score: 5, Informative
  12. Good by BigJClark · · Score: 2, Informative


    Maybe in 10 years the game of hockey will return to normal, and we won't have to worry about the prancing-through-the-daffodil-swedes wrecking our game with their pseudo-soccer-take-the-fall style of game.

    I kid, I kid ;)

    --

    Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    1. Re:Good by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

      I take it you're not a Red Wings fan, aka the Swedish National farm team.

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  13. The Temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you suppose Linus was coding all winter instead of out playing golf, tennis, or basketball.
    It wasn't yet too cold to type. This could be the end of open source. Unless all the CS people in the frozen north get bored with gaming.

    1. Re:The Temperature by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      Electronic Arts is ironically going to be the savior of Open Source then? [citation needed]

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
  14. Re:On the other hand... by Loibisch · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thank god...at first I thought those values in those columns were percent. double-digits suicide rates would be sick...

  15. Be more specific by johnkzin · · Score: 1

    When reading this article via RSS, I couldn't tell if you meant Computer Gaming (or even pen and paper gaming), or Gambling ("The Gaming Industry" usually refers to gambling), or based upon the writing skills of some contributors, maybe even hunting (game == animals).

    I had to actually open the article on /. to see that it has a "pcgames" tag to know that it's about computer games. I shouldn't have to do that.

    Try to be nice to the RSS subscribers. Be a little more specific in your article summaries.

  16. Where do Swedish dudes find the time... by Ender+Wiggin+77 · · Score: 1

    with all those uber-hot Swedish women around?

    1. Re:Where do Swedish dudes find the time... by Sobieski · · Score: 1

      They are under our desks.

      --
      Particles, stuff that matters.
    2. Re:Where do Swedish dudes find the time... by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Having had the pleasure of working in Stockholm I refer to Sweeden as Walk into Lamppost country because of all the head turning women.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Where do Swedish dudes find the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having had the pleasure of working in Stockholm I refer to Sweeden as Walk into Lamppost country because of all the head turning women.

      A country of Linda Blairs?

  17. Re:On the other hand... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about triple-digits?

  18. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Odd how China is the only country with a higher female suicide rate.

  19. More than - played - football and hockey by westlake · · Score: 1
    Sure, almost anyone can play a round of knock-about pond hockey as a kid.

    .
    But fundamentally, organized league play is a physically demanding - potentially very dangerous sport - at every level. Typically kids begin training no later than nine or ten and it's a big investment in time and money.

    You can be a Wii Bowler and call yourself physically active. But that isn't going to be good enough to keep you competitive on the rink with a talented seventh grader.

    1. Re:More than - played - football and hockey by saintsfan · · Score: 1

      i noticed that too.

      "Gaming bigger than football and hockey combined
      39% of the population has played computer games this year. The figures for football are 24% and for hockey 3%. 17% of the ones who play computer games do it regularly, compared to 5% for football and 1% for hockey. This means that computer gaming is almost three times as big as football and hockey combined."

      around here, most people watch football and hockey, not play them.

  20. What about the asians? by Zathain+Sicarius · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haven't they been following this same trend for a while? Heck, Star Craft is essentially a sport over in Korea.

    1. Re:What about the asians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that the number of asians in sweden is negligible at best.

  21. borkborkbork by yours+truly+zerocool · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean when Starcraft 2 comes out I will start seeing borkborkborks instead of just kekekes?

    1. Re:borkborkbork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for giving me my first lol of the day, that is fantastic

    2. Re:borkborkbork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Und nowen der Zergen rooshen, bork bork bork.

    3. Re:borkborkbork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precis. :P

  22. Since when do swedes play football? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't see them playing football. Maybe norway, because they got lots of bigs guys that could easily play the line, but swedes? Maybe flag football.

  23. Why is this surprising? by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Museums, it turns out, have much higher attendance in aggregate than professional sports. They have a much greater net economic impact than professional sports as well. A single headliner museum in a city can bring in a quarter of a billion dollars annually; the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (an absolutely amazing place) was shown to bring in 369 million annually to the Boston area in a recent study. This is actually comparable to the annual revenue of the Red Sox; the net impact of the Red Sox on regional economy might be somewhat more, but there are a lot more comparable cultural institutions in Boston than there are comparable sports teams. You can walk across the street from the MFA to the Gardner, a smaller but equally culturally significant art museum. Boston is a famous sports town, but it is stuffed to the gills with cultural institutions that have heavy attendance every day (except possibly Mondays) year round.

    I think one of the reasons for the outsize impact of cultural institutions is that they have a mission to have an impact. They're supposed to maximize bodies in the doors, eyeballs on the exhibits. Sports franchises aren't run that way. They're run to maximize profit.

    Gaming's higher impact is likewise related to the fact you can do it every day. However it isn't going to have the same economic impact as having strong cultural institutions.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Why is this surprising? by drfireman · · Score: 1

      That's a very interesting post. But I think the numbers must tilt heavily in favor of spectator sports if you include not just attendance but also sports on TV (which I believe is the main source of revenue for most pro sports franchises). Most sports fans I know see about two orders of magnitude more games on television than live. This would account for why, although museums have more live attendance, you're more likely to end up talking about sports around the water cooler.

    2. Re:Why is this surprising? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting comparison of the economic impact. It's not surprising that people coming and paying money every day adds up to more money than a few dozen games a year bring in. Companies with recurring service fees also tend to do better at milking their clients than those with one-time charges. :)

      Coincidentally, I am planning a trip to Boston right now. The MFA is indeed spectacular and enough to entice a Miami boy to venture north into the freezing cold. :)

      The New England Aquarium also has my favorite animal; the Sea Dragon. :)
      http://www.neaq.org/animals_and_exhibits/animals/sea_dragons/index.php

      And The Harvard Museum of Natural History has some quite amazing exhibits, as well. http://www.hmnh.harvard.edu/

    3. Re:Why is this surprising? by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I endorse your recommendations. Also, if you've been to the MFA, definitely ought to walk across the street to the Gardner. It's a must see. I'm serious, if you think the MFA is a reason to visit Boston, you have to do the Gardner.

      With respect to Harvard's museums, you should consider in addition to Natural History the Fogg, (art), Peabody (archaeology) and most especially in the Spring or Summer the Arnold Arboretum (the tree museum), which is a must see.

      The Peabody Essex in Salem can be combined with a side trip to Salem (worthwhile). This museum is another must see. On the South Shore, I think Plimouth Plantation and the Mayflower replica is worth a side trip in the summer. This time of year you can have Thanksgiving dinner. A third really worthwhile side trip is to the Higgins armory in Worcestor, which displays antique armor and swords. If you're interested in that sort of thing you might also consider a trip to Gloucester's Hammond Museum. A side side trip to Dogtown is recommended as well.

      Those are just the major museums; we haven't started on the historical sites: the Paul Revere house, the Old North Church, the Constitution, the Adams National Historic Park, Lexington & Concord. Many towns here have historical societies and museums, and offer worthwhile lectures (e.g., the Somerville Museum).

      The Boston Harbor Islands host two museums, one on Spectacle Island and Fort Warren on George's Island, although you'd need to be hardy to take the boat trip this time of year. For a change of pace, the Trustees of Reservations (http://www.thetrustees.org/ ) operates a number of outstanding natural sites, many of which are also important historical sites -- Castle Hill in Ipswich and the Old Manse come to mind.

      Since you're in Cambridge, you can also try the MIT Museum; while you're there check out the Hart nautical museum's model ships. Then you can nip across the Charles and visit the Maparium at the Christian Science Mother Church.

      The point is museums are a lot bigger thing than you'd think. Of course everyone knows Boston has a lot of museum, but I doubt very few people know how mind-bogglingly many there are here. I haven't even name all the significant ones. I'd bet you could draw a one hour drive radius around Boston and within that circle you could visit a different museum every single day of the week (except Mondays) and it would literally, without exaggeration, take you years to exhaust them all.

      And it's not just college towns like Boston. I visited Cinncinati a few years ago, and easily found three world class museums: the Zoo, of course; The Cinncinati Art Museum (excellent collection of Dutch Masters); and the Krohn Conservatory. I was visiting friends, but these institutions were worth a visit in themselves.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Why is this surprising? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's a bit of an apples and oranges comparison.

      I don't think for a minute that the total impact of the MFA is as large on the Boston economy as the Red Sox. However -- the disparity is much less than you'd think. You wouldn't think any museum could pump as much into the economy that even 1% of what a dominant sports franchise does. The bottom line is that your friends sitting around watching the Sox don't spend money with the kind of dollar multiplier effect that people who actually visit the city do, whether it is to take in a game or visit a museum. Ordering Red Sox stuff off a website is good for the Sox, and good for clothing importers, but it does nothing for a city.

      And I'm not saying it has to. I'm just sick of sports being looked at as the only kind of public amenity that matters, as the paradigm for raising the status of a city and driving economic growth. A great sports team is an asset to a city; it's just not the only kind.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Why is this surprising? by drfireman · · Score: 1

      Certainly agree on most points; I really think the price of keeping a pro sports team in town often grows to the point where it's a bad investment. Of course, video games are no help either, but just to get back on topic, if video games help draw interest away from pro sports teams, that could have a beneficial effect on the parts of local budgets set aside for "culture." Pro sports teams sucker big cities into bad investments, but so far video games haven't.

      I do want to address one thing you said specifically. I know you were speaking figuratively, but my friends absolutely do not sit around watching the Sox. My friends sit around watching the WORLD CHAMPION PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES. Just had to get that in there, we don't have much opportunity around here.

    6. Re:Why is this surprising? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, then, when was the last time you went to the Franklin Institute? Damn great museum. I have no hesitation saying it kicks the crap out of Boston's Museum of Science. On the other hand, nothing in Philly touches the MFA or Gardner.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Why is this surprising? by drfireman · · Score: 1

      I went to the Franklin Institute hundreds of times growing up. It was not bad, but I didn't learn much about science from it. I treated it like a video game, but to be fair to myself, that's how things were presented (for the most part). I went again a year or so ago, and... well, it was more educational than a visit to the mall, but not by as wide a margin as you'd think. Philadelphia is a blue-collar town at a very deep level.

  24. Re:On the other hand... by somersault · · Score: 1

    So the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe isn't a country now?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  25. Gaming Jock by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    But the gaming jock is never going to sleep with the prom queen.

    1. Re:Gaming Jock by OolimPhon · · Score: 3, Funny

      The gaming jock is the prom queen, you insensitive clod!

  26. Is this surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More people play video games than engage in organized physical activity? I'm shocked, SHOCKED! I always thought it was a minority of people that engaged in organized sports...

  27. OF COURSE it is 1 by unity100 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    what is football and hockey after all ?

    you just sit in front of a tv, and passively watch OTHER people playing a game.

    with computer games, at least YOU get to play the game.

    1. Re:OF COURSE it is 1 by lagfest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the hell is this insightful?

      The summary says that playing computer games is more popular than playing soccer or hockey combined.

    2. Re:OF COURSE it is 1 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Why is this insightful? The survey was about playing sports, not watching them. I'm not entirely surprised, either. Both sports require two decent-sized teams who meet regularly, which is a lot to organise. Something like squash or badminton is much easier, since you just need 1 or three friends and time on a court. A computer game just requires you (friends are ideal, but you can find substitute-friends on the Internet if you don't have any). I played ultimate frisbee over the summer, and when the weather got bad the attendance dropped off sharply - we went from 7-12 a side to 3-4 a side (which involves a lot more running).

      It's also interesting that they compared two fairly similar sports to all computer games. I wonder what the results would be for FPS or RTS gaming against either sport, for example.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:OF COURSE it is 1 by slashwhore · · Score: 1

      If that's football for you you need to leave the couch for once. Really.

    4. Re:OF COURSE it is 1 by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Unless they mean that playing hockey or football is less popular than playing games.
      Otherwise, it's a rather pointless comparison.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  28. No Suprise Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden is also the host of the oldest running LPMUD, NannyMUD (http://www.nannymud.com/). Sweden was doing multiplayer gaming before most of us had the internets!

    1. Re:No Suprise Here by argent · · Score: 1

      I implemented a multiplayer online game before the Internet had converted to TCP, and I am but an egg compared to Bartle. LPMUD is a newcomer.

  29. Re:On the other hand... by joshtheitguy · · Score: 1

    What surprises me is with the whole Emo pop culture trend of this decade the US isn't at the top of the list.

  30. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odd how China is the only country with a higher female suicide rate.

    Perhaps they really don't see "little, yellow, different" as being worth living for?

    (/tongue in cheek reference to chinese male genitalia)

    Sig Missing

  31. Useless Statistic by interploy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agreed.

    This shouldn't even be news. I wouldn't doubt if this was true for every country. If they did a survey in the US, I'd bet money they'd find more people play sports games than play sports.

    Where's the statistic for how many people play games vs watch sports as their primary recreation?

  32. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are more professional athletes in the US than there are people in Sweden.

  33. it is cheaper too by excelsior_gr · · Score: 2

    Gaming is also cheap compared to attending a soccer event. The stadium entrance fee ranges from 50 to 100 Euros and you get 90 min of entertainment. A PS3 costs about 400 Euros (depending on the version) and a game sales at about 25 Euros (prices of course vary), which means that a PS3 and two new games is roughly like going 6 times to the soccer stadium, i.e. "buying" 9 hours of entertainment. With two PS3 games you can definitely spend a LOT more time than that, plus the fact that you will only buy the console once.

    1. Re:it is cheaper too by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      But is playing games cheaper than playing football?

      Gaming might be rather expensive, depending on what equipment you need for your particular games.
      Many sports are also quite expensive due to equipment-cost.
      Football is one of the cheaper sports, equipment wise. In it's simplest form, all you need is a ball.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  34. Re:On the other hand... by zeromorph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, with a population of ca. 157,000 (in 2005) and the fact that the suicides are listed by "suicides per 100,000 people per year", I think the fact that there is 0.0 male and 1.8 female suicides in 1987(!) - which basically means there was probably only one suicide in that year and it happened to be a woman - we can safely say: the data is insufficient to make a valid statement about the distribution.

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
  35. Re:Sad Health by LandDolphin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah,

    Because doing anything for fun that isn't pushing the human body to new heights isn't worth doing.

    If your not doing sit-ups while posting on Slashdot, then you should be arrested.

    --
    Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  36. Yes Association Football by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Football - as known by most of the world. This is a game where the ball is controlled by the feet. That is why we call it football.

    I don't know what to call that stop-start activity you have in the USA. Football is not a word I would choose for it...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Yes Association Football by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Traffic jam on foot?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  37. Re:Sad Health by genner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. because too many people can no longer even set foot on a tennis court without being out of breath we have substituted physical prowess in competition for mental reflex prowess. Pushing the human body to new heights is a sport, sitting on your ass in a chair isn't a sport. Counter Strike isn't a sport. Team Fortress 2 isn't a sport. It's a substitute activity for people either too fat or too lazy to go outside.

    ANYONE HEALTHY PERSON CAUGHT PLAYING VIRTUAL TENNIS IN THE SUMMER SHOULD BE ARRESTED! ANYONE HEALTHY PERSON CAUGHT PLAYING VIRTUAL BOWLING ANY TIME OF THE YEAR SHOULD BE ARRESTED!

    Go outside people.

    I'll buy that argument as soon as ESPN stops calling NASCAR a sport.

  38. Re:On the other hand... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

    As any stupid trend, people who follows it aren't "that" committed to the whole extent of it. Which means they say they don't wanna live, but they will never kill themselves. Even though I wouldn't mind some gene-pool cleansing, for the sake of humankind lol (j/k)

  39. Re:On the other hand... by pwnies · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those are the countries with a lot of failed attempts.

  40. Re:Sad Health by Leafheart · · Score: 1

    And you are inside why?

    --
    --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
  41. Re:On the other hand... by b4upoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Anything to avoid opening the door and stumbling out into that 40 below zero with the 12 foot snow drifts and 60 mph winds! Indoors activities sound better and better.

  42. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden's cold...

  43. Re:On the other hand... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    No. They would never pull trough with that. It would not be Emo to actually do something.

    Bitchin' about it on the other hand... ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  44. Re:Sad Health by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    I'll buy that argument as soon as ESPN stops calling NASCAR a sport.

    What defines a sport?

    Must it be performed by athletes, or are there non-athletic sports?
    Are there athletic competitions that are not a sport?
    Must there be a competition involved, or can you have non-competitive sports?

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  45. Re:Sad Health by Whorhay · · Score: 1

    Depends on the context. People have hunted for sport for years. I think in that context it just means for the fun and challenge, not necessarily against another human competitors. While I can't under stand the entertainment value in watching NASCAR I can see why it's a sport. The conditions a driver performs under are pretty grueling. And the reaction speeds and skill necessary to drive competively at those speeds are very restrictive. We can joke about how difficult it is to drive in a circle all day but doing it better than a bunch of other teams in those conditions is definitely challenging.

  46. This Youtube video says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vi sitter här i Venten och spelar lite DotA... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OzWIFX8M-Y

  47. Re:Seen it coming- Honckey also! by Mrs+Gupta · · Score: 1

    Goodness!
    Swedish men also wear ridiculous armour when they play hockey- just like those "wimpey" Canadians and Americans.
    I have no doubt as to why they prefer shootey-shootey bang-bang childrens' games in front of the telly, to a real game of football or "hockey" (I believe in North America they call it Ice Honckey).
    I suggest there has been too much plastic residue / estrogens leaching into their drinking water over the last generation or so. The current westerner would not have a chance if he attempted to play hockey- REAL hockey - on the playing fields in my land!
    I.E. sans "padding" as you effete westerners call it.
    Let him languorously lounge in front of his gaming monitor", the poor estrogen-laden layabout.
    One would think they had enough female-fat padding already!
    But no! That is why they must now take these steroid additions, the poor chaps!

  48. Re:Seen it coming- pudding lad by Mrs+Gupta · · Score: 1

    My goddness, you are a potty-mouth, aren't you, little lad!
    Does your mummy know you takk like this on /. ?

    Perhaps you should return to pulling your pudding, young poltroon.

  49. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or countries that people travel to to commit suicide.

    That would make for terrifying tourism PR campaigns.

  50. Participating, yes. Watching, probably not. by Riktov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As the article says, the survey is about how many people participate in the sports and gaming. If you put it that way, probably more Americans play games than play basketball, more Japanese play games than play baseball. Not at all surprising.

    But if someone says he's "in to football", chances are good that he's in to watching professional football, not playing it. Apparently only 3% of Swedes play hockey, but undoubtedly many many more watch it. I think even a lot of football fans would, if placed in front of a TV set, prefer to interact and be challenged by a game than passively watch a game. And either activity would be greatly preferred to actually going out and getting down in the dirt.

    And nowhere does the article mention the amount of money spent on gaming vs. sports, and that's the conventional measure of how "big" something is. It's quite possible that gaming does take in more money, but probably not to the proportions reported here.

  51. My 2 cents by Mgns · · Score: 1

    The most powerful strategy I've found for getting the right sort of attention from women is when in a mixed gender group: Be the guy that makes the other guys feel good about themselves.

    That means being a positive force at the table.

    The women almost always notice and you are insta-alpha without having to be a jock of any sort.

  52. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was discovered that in the USA, gaming is bigger than curling and soccer combined!

    (similar survey - why target a country that could already care less about an American or Canadian sport and compare video gaming to that?)

  53. Rugby's origins + footballs too... by jools33 · · Score: 1

    For the origins of rugby - and football for that matter - see here:
    http://rugbyfootballhistory.com/originsofrugby.htm

  54. Baseball perfect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think baseball is a perfect strategic game, you haven't seen "Finnish baseball" a.k.a. pesäpallo.

    The biggest differences:
    1) If the ball falls outside the playing field, it's always a foul. In American version you can in theory just keep hitting the ball far enough back and keep racking homeruns.
    However, the Finnish version is not played on closed stadiums so if the outfielders don't catch the ball, it can roll pretty far away.
    2) The pitcher is standing right next to the hitter and always pitches upwards. The ball must clear a minimum height and must hit the plate when coming down (unless the hitter hits the ball before it lands, of course). This makes it less of a skill contest between the pitcher and the hitter and places more emphasis on the different kinds of hits.
    3) The bases are arranged differently. Instead of the right-back-left arrangement, the Finnish version uses left-right-farther left arrangement. This means that the distance to 1st base is the shortest, 1-2 and 2-3 are longer and the distance from 3rd to home is the longest. And it's faster to throw the ball to any of the bases.

    Baseball may well be highly strategic but it's pretty simple compared to the true sport: pesäpallo :)

  55. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An urban legend my good man: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

    Huh. China's the only major country where women commit suicide more often than men, according to that.

  56. Exercise by Roger+Wernersson · · Score: 1

    It also says 39% play games and 74% of games exercise compared to 61% of the whole population.

    Now, that means only 32% of non-gamers exercise.

    You'd think that would be big news too.

    --
    temporarily sigless
  57. Originally the game went on for longer than 5 days by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Early major international games were "timeless" - they would go on until a result was achieved. However this format was abandoned due to the uncertainty of when the match would finish and outside pressures.

    The last ever timeless cricket Test (the most prestigious form of the game) was the 5th Test between England and South Africa at Durban in 1939, which was abandoned as a draw after 9 days of play spread over 11 days because otherwise the England team would have missed the boat for home.

    So, the current 5 day Test, that's a short version... :-)

  58. 6 hours and they stop for tea by fantomas · · Score: 1

    5 day test matches last up to five days of play, though can be shorter if one side wins faster. On each day there are usually three two-hour sessions with a forty minute break for lunch and a twenty minute break for tea. Weather conditions might affect how long players are in the field for (you don't play in the rain or poor light).

    What a lovely game. What other sports games have an official break for afternoon tea written into the Laws of the Game?

  59. To quote The Faint by noundi · · Score: 1

    "When I saw the future, the geeks were right."
    -The Faint - The geeks were right

    --
    I am the lawn!
  60. The trend is stronger outside the US by MMInterface · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't surprise you because it is not strictly a US trend. It's really a small percentage of people in the US. The trend or trends resembling it are much stronger in many nations outside the US. Even Seattle can't compare to a place like Tokyo in this respect. But other than that, this is more of a case of stereotype vs reality. Most of the people in Japan jumping in front of trains and sniffing household detergent are not what you would consider emo kids even though you will see a lot more of them there than in the US.

  61. Basshunter's Boten Anna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is in a country were a song about an irc bot tops the charts(good song too), no surprise

  62. Re:Sad Health by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    I gave up that war, you can't argue with a mullet regardless of the discussion. Hockey, NASCAR, pro-wrestling, or which episode of the DoH was the best...

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  63. Bitter? by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    I was talking about sex to begin with...bitter much?;)

    Contrary to popular belief, most women want to be friends with the people with whom they have sex.

    There's the girls who date the asshole, and they're just hopeless...like the smart guys who date the good looking moron thinking she'll grow a brain.

    Nerdy guys are just pathetic though. You can tell when they're looking for pussy a mile away and they'll go on about working for Bioware for 20 minutes before they realize you're just not that interested.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.