or you can realize that the block delemeter is : what i mean is. If you ever end a line with ':' you're editor should indent subsequent lines untill you go back an indent level on a line. Autoindent in most editors will respect indenting just because you've manually indented the line before.
not just yet. Im sure that's a valid question that can't be answered by google but maybe in an afternoon IRC chat hopping. I don't know the answer.
I get that if you Look at the GPL code while writing your own, you must put yours under the gpl as well but CDDL isn't exactly clear on what you can't do when looking at the code. if zfs was written while looking at the CDDL solaris kernel and then put under gpl, linux users couild port it, and post bug reports and patches back to sun for them to look at and fix zfs code. I dont think the GPL code can infect the code it was devrived from. I haven't really looked at the CCDL
actually I think this should be rated, Offtopic because, though he did such a thing, he didn't develope this one. I think the "who?" was in refering to the fact that few use True64 and I am suprised HP still dealt with unix instead of moving upgrading their clients to linux.
the osascript command should run whatever commands as the user so it should setuid whatever app its sending the apple event, (in other words setuid what ever its telling "to do shell script" to the user osascript is running as)
Ah, but first you must read their EULA. For example, before we go into a contract, the other company must sign a contract for us. one denied because we had a clause in the contract to the tune of "you will be held responsible for loss of life resulting from the use of your software". In their defence, it was a resource management system that managed hardware. it was so fine grained and expensive that I could see someone jumping off a building after paying for it and seeing that it's crap(or miss managed medical equipment but we don't do that). I could see someone dieing because their cvs import was flawed also (in the same way).
OK so never mind that the people on hurd are already thinking about this hardware changing thing but HURD is an architecture level project, which means that its solutions are mostly architecture independent. The Fragmentation among bsd descendants are, because its the similarities that are mostly cosmetic. This puts impasses on the D in bsD, Distro. Darwin doesn't have the same kernel interface as the other BSDs (note the difference in driver programming method).
But the little bit of support they give makes pixelmater for lepord 64 bit by defau_t. I'__ _et a Pixe_mater rep speak for how dificu_t it was. wou_d the editor p_ease rep_ace my underscores with the 17th _etter of the a_phabet.
I will have to aggree with the this point in the fact that Mac OS X isn't entirely new. it melds some pretty old ideas. NeXt, Mach, and BSD. but this doens't mean that you shouldn't start forsaking compatibilities (emphasis on the plural) for increased security (and potentials there of ) and functionality as well (EG: the below QT/KDE example). Note how most of these examples started working ont the new stuff long before they released it (like PY3k)
I would personally prefer dreamweaver but if we made an open source competitor to dreamweaver, something better than Kompozer/Nvu, something more usefull and functional than Bluefish (like bluefish with a GOOD wysiwyg editor) we wouldn't need this. Besides if we put more support behind FUSE we could see seamless support for network editing without having to code each app for it. (i mean fuse-smb fuse-loginftp fuse-sftp) so i don't have to depend on gnome vfs.
ok, just answer this question that burns me everytime I run through the tutorial. Are the sigles enforced by the language/parser? keyword 'self' is said not to be enforced in python and same with the underscores (accept __specialfunction__ because its like overloading the special opperators of c++). No i don't wet my pants but i did when i saw the message like syntax of Objective-C expressed in ruby. I want to use this language but web programming is no excuse. I was taught python and C++ by force but objective-c was the only language i learned on my own. i'll take his (zed's) word that the book he mentioned was crap cause Aron Hilleghas' book wasn't by o'riley either and his evidence was good.
For the time, I think Zed Shaw made the right decision, go to Python. Ruby is Lisp with Perl syntax.
YES!!! I knew it! each time i take the time to try to learn this while knowing python I cant bring my self to see why they use it for web programming.
My problem with php before using it was always that it seems like you can only use it on the web. Now that i've actually picked up a book on php and have to learn it by force (student worker for a webdev department hopped up on php and ColdFusion, go fig) i can see what i didn't like about the language in the first place (i had to come up with a different argument) and it seems that its only purpose is to be quick and dirty. that is in both parsing and writing. thats why python and ruby communities agree that php is the devil. I want to learn lisp because i see its potential. i got a book on perl before i knew how to program and php reminds me of perl in how all the functions seem hardcoded. then prel (just as i write this) brings to mind the feeling i had while writing CF, that i must get by without writing a function. (i hated that feeling) I think i'll stick with python, do more objective c and pickup fscript for debugging reasons lisp because i really do feel like once i start using it it will blow my mind (like chocolate gum not like cannabis).
"Don't misunderstand the ECMA's intent, though: there" 'though' is not needed here. sure the comma sets it apart from the sentence but it stops from reading it fluidly.
the Rhythm is appreciated
but how does this stop us from being exploided by upstream dns servers?
or you can realize that the block delemeter is :
what i mean is. If you ever end a line with ':' you're editor should indent subsequent lines untill you go back an indent level on a line. Autoindent in most editors will respect indenting just because you've manually indented the line before.
You can do that in synaptic also. Theres a search field in most package managers, even aptitude!
not just yet. Im sure that's a valid question that can't be answered by google but maybe in an afternoon IRC chat hopping. I don't know the answer.
I get that if you Look at the GPL code while writing your own, you must put yours under the gpl as well but CDDL isn't exactly clear on what you can't do when looking at the code. if zfs was written while looking at the CDDL solaris kernel and then put under gpl, linux users couild port it, and post bug reports and patches back to sun for them to look at and fix zfs code. I dont think the GPL code can infect the code it was devrived from. I haven't really looked at the CCDL
actually I think this should be rated, Offtopic because, though he did such a thing, he didn't develope this one. I think the "who?" was in refering to the fact that few use True64 and I am suprised HP still dealt with unix instead of moving upgrading their clients to linux.
I don't remember enabling ard. when do you do that? isn't that a sharing prefrence?
the osascript command should run whatever commands as the user so it should setuid whatever app its sending the apple event, (in other words setuid what ever its telling "to do shell script" to the user osascript is running as)
it hasn't been released for firefox 3 has it? when will it?
does it run on linux? mac? no? well, I'll just continue playing my Wii.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-flash-filesystems/
I was just about to say that, if you want 60watts in LEDs, I guess it would get a bit expensive.
Ah, but first you must read their EULA. For example, before we go into a contract, the other company must sign a contract for us. one denied because we had a clause in the contract to the tune of "you will be held responsible for loss of life resulting from the use of your software". In their defence, it was a resource management system that managed hardware. it was so fine grained and expensive that I could see someone jumping off a building after paying for it and seeing that it's crap(or miss managed medical equipment but we don't do that). I could see someone dieing because their cvs import was flawed also (in the same way).
serves him right
Is there anyone planning to port this to power PC architecture or any other? what part of this is arch specific anyway?
OK so never mind that the people on hurd are already thinking about this hardware changing thing but HURD is an architecture level project, which means that its solutions are mostly architecture independent. The Fragmentation among bsd descendants are, because its the similarities that are mostly cosmetic. This puts impasses on the D in bsD, Distro. Darwin doesn't have the same kernel interface as the other BSDs (note the difference in driver programming method).
webdavfs
But the little bit of support they give makes pixelmator for leopard 64bit by default or at least with little effort on the developer's part.
But the little bit of support they give makes pixelmater for lepord 64 bit by defau_t. I'__ _et a Pixe_mater rep speak for how dificu_t it was. wou_d the editor p_ease rep_ace my underscores with the 17th _etter of the a_phabet.
I will have to aggree with the this point in the fact that Mac OS X isn't entirely new. it melds some pretty old ideas. NeXt, Mach, and BSD . but this doens't mean that you shouldn't start forsaking compatibilities (emphasis on the plural) for increased security (and potentials there of ) and functionality as well (EG: the below QT/KDE example). Note how most of these examples started working ont the new stuff long before they released it (like PY3k)
Why is it that when I have mod points, there's never any stories worth moderating? SOMEBODY MOD THIS UP AS FUNNY!
I would personally prefer dreamweaver but if we made an open source competitor to dreamweaver, something better than Kompozer/Nvu, something more usefull and functional than Bluefish (like bluefish with a GOOD wysiwyg editor) we wouldn't need this. Besides if we put more support behind FUSE we could see seamless support for network editing without having to code each app for it. (i mean fuse-smb fuse-loginftp fuse-sftp) so i don't have to depend on gnome vfs.
ok, just answer this question that burns me everytime I run through the tutorial. Are the sigles enforced by the language/parser? keyword 'self' is said not to be enforced in python and same with the underscores (accept __specialfunction__ because its like overloading the special opperators of c++). No i don't wet my pants but i did when i saw the message like syntax of Objective-C expressed in ruby. I want to use this language but web programming is no excuse. I was taught python and C++ by force but objective-c was the only language i learned on my own. i'll take his (zed's) word that the book he mentioned was crap cause Aron Hilleghas' book wasn't by o'riley either and his evidence was good.
For the time, I think Zed Shaw made the right decision, go to Python. Ruby is Lisp with Perl syntax.
YES!!! I knew it! each time i take the time to try to learn this while knowing python I cant bring my self to see why they use it for web programming. My problem with php before using it was always that it seems like you can only use it on the web. Now that i've actually picked up a book on php and have to learn it by force (student worker for a webdev department hopped up on php and ColdFusion, go fig) i can see what i didn't like about the language in the first place (i had to come up with a different argument) and it seems that its only purpose is to be quick and dirty. that is in both parsing and writing. thats why python and ruby communities agree that php is the devil. I want to learn lisp because i see its potential. i got a book on perl before i knew how to program and php reminds me of perl in how all the functions seem hardcoded. then prel (just as i write this) brings to mind the feeling i had while writing CF, that i must get by without writing a function. (i hated that feeling) I think i'll stick with python, do more objective c and pickup fscript for debugging reasons lisp because i really do feel like once i start using it it will blow my mind (like chocolate gum not like cannabis)."Don't misunderstand the ECMA's intent, though: there" 'though' is not needed here. sure the comma sets it apart from the sentence but it stops from reading it fluidly.