Slashdot Mirror


Taking the Wii Controller to the Next Level

funfail writes "It's a Wii without the $250 console. It's virtual Pong and so much more. Any object is now an input device, even your fingers. Camspace is a pure software solution that allows nearly any ordinary PC webcam (95% are supported) to track up to four objects — even as small as 5mm — in real-time and with very high accuracy and reliability (Windows only). Techcrunch has an in-depth article and a video." Very neat idea, but it appears that it is in a limited beta only, and source doesn't appear likely.

157 comments

  1. Taking the wii controller tothe next level by antirelic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet! At the next level my Wii controller gets henchmen and has a ThAC0 of 11, and 98 Hit points! I think we will be ready to defeat the Play station which is only level 3!

    --
    20th century Marxism is not progress...
    1. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by Umuri · · Score: 1

      Fat chance.

      The Playstation still has its rich history bonus from level 2, and at level 3 it's henchen fanboys got upgrades of imdomnitable and unyielding.

      Still you might be able to blind it for a bit and throw it onto a cloud.

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    2. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      360 (XBOX MS Neu Cha) 0 killed by a red ring, while helpless

    3. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by XenoPhage · · Score: 1

      ThAC0? That hasn't existed since Version 3 was released...

      --
      XenoPhage
      Technological Musings
    4. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by Sabz5150 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Powerlevel it by having it fight some TV screens.

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    5. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by spymagician · · Score: 1

      The Wii continues to dominate the console market in numbers sold. Couple that with the massive sales of the DS and it's quite apparent that Nintendo is utterly crushing the competition. =) http://www.vgchartz.com/

    6. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So?

    7. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by Lordpidey · · Score: 1

      And also remember that roughly 2/3 of the Sony fanboys have the feat: deformity (Obese) from BoVD. The extra con will make them harder to kill.

      --
      Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
    8. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by MerrickStar · · Score: 1

      Wait, were you just pointing out that a /.er is out of date?

    9. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by masterzora · · Score: 1

      And some people still play 2e. I fail to see your point.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    10. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, were you just pointing out that a /.er is out of date? Not me.....

      I just upgraded my Commodore 64 modem to one of those new 9600 baud models. I'm surfing Slashdot faster than ever now. Eat your heart out everyone!!!
    11. Re:Taking the wii controller tothe next level by valentingalea · · Score: 0

      Oh noo!, even the Wii involves grinding!

  2. Its Multitouch for the masses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    set one of these up pointing at your computer screen... and have it track your fingers.

    1. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      "one of these" isn't anything but a webcam.

      That's the whole point. You don't have to buy any hardware or software for that matter, they say they will never charge anyone for the software either.

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    2. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What? Multitouch without lining the pockets of Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? Blasphemer! Communist! Why, that's downright un-American! Put him in Gitmo! ;)

      The question is: okay, so we know it will be free as in beer, and that they will have Windows first, then Mac and Linux later. But what about free as in speech? This is all in software -- so will they be releasing this under an open source license? And if not, why?

    3. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by gyepi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This should be combined with the head-tracking solution by Johnny Chung Lee (your head is the object which is recognized) - low cost 3D first person shooters!

      --
      Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
    4. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and that they will have Windows first, then Mac and Linux later. Sure, sure. That is what they all say. FTFB (from the fine blog)
      "A version for Mac is on our to-do list. Linux is as well."

      Yep, don't hold your breath on that todo list.

      They say _they_ will never charge for the software. Cool, right? Simple, answer, they will get bought by some company, who will then license the software.

      Come on people. These steps have been repeated throughout the dot com boom.

      1.) Make some tech that seems cool.
      2.) Get a little seed money.
      3.) Make grand claims.
      4.) Get bought out.
      5.) Ignore step 3 claims.
    5. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      6 ???
      7 Massive Debt!!!!

    6. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I don't have a webcam, you insensitive clod.

      Last time I checked, a webcam was a hardware purchase......and not everyone has one (for some of you, I'm glad of that fact).

      Layne

    7. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      That's not how you do it now. Now its:

      1) Make some tech that seems cool.
      2) Get a little seed money.
      3) Give the shit away for free, IF the consumer hands you a ton of personal data.
      4) Sell demographic data to niche marketeers on a subscription model.
      5) Profit like a motherfucker.

    8. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by koninc · · Score: 1

      There is already software to do headtracking from a webcam: http://www.faceapi.com/

    9. Re:Its Multitouch for the masses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the question. It's their software and they can do what they like with it.

      It's only OSS geeks that have to ask why software isn't OS, or if it's OS enough.

      Most of us are OK accepting the model the developers chose, and using the sofware (or not) based whether we can live with it.

  3. No source but... by siyavash · · Score: 1

    nevertheless, very interesting! Really cool.

  4. Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but /. is running ads for Russian mail-order dating sites now? Seriously? I realize we're all nerds here and not exactly smoove with the ladies, but is this how low we've sunk? Damn. That just peed all over my morning.

    1. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hans Reiser is the new ad exec for Slashdot

    2. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Im sure theres a FileSystem joke in there somewhere.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but /. is running ads for Russian mail-order dating sites now? Seriously? I realize we're all nerds here and not exactly smoove with the ladies, but is this how low we've sunk? Damn. That just peed all over my morning. It's just you. Maybe /. has some context aware adds like gmail. Maybe /. is trying to tell you something...
    4. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has ads?

    5. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet Russia, Russian brides order you!

    6. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but /. is running ads for Russian mail-order dating sites now? Seriously? ... I thought DICE was a head hunter site for tech jobs?
    7. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by brkello · · Score: 1

      Right. Because he had a great experience with his mail-order Russian bride...

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    8. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Manfre · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Slashdot has ads? I figured every here has firefox with noscript or one of the many ad blocking extensions.

    9. Re:Posting AC because I'm 100% offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's ads on slashdot? (an ad block plus user) As a shareholder in LNUX, I guess I should be outraged at myself!

  5. Nice tech, but latency? by J-F+Mammet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This certainly seems to be a very nice software, but the main issue with using webcams as input devices is the latency. Your average webcam can take quite some time between what it's filming and what the PC is actually getting at the other end. And this is a very bad thing when it comes to gaming. You can even see the latency in their video at around 1:30 when they have the players and the PC screen in the same frame.
    Nice for simple games I guess, but for serious gaming it would require special cameras with low latency.

    1. Re:Nice tech, but latency? by JustKidding · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can see some applications for this in 3D modeling, where latency isn't really an issue. The solitaire game at 2:10 has some scary similarities with Minority Report.

    2. Re:Nice tech, but latency? by pherthyl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah the video is hard to believe. I've done lots of work with image processing using webcams and they're usually pretty crap. You can get 30fps max, and then usually only at 320x240. If the lighting conditions aren't good, your framerate will drop (or everything goes unusably dark if you disable the automatic aperture adjustment).

      They show some latency, but overall the motion is incredibly smooth. Based on my experience that's impossible, but I'd love to be proven wrong. Gotta try that out.

    3. Re:Nice tech, but latency? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Typical firewire webcams are now often hard to find, except sometimes very cheaply as discount surplus :) DV is an acceptable quality/resolution...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Nice tech, but latency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone explain how more than 1 or two frames of lag are possible? I can't imagine that cheap webcams actually have enough memory to buffer more than the frame, but I doubt they even do that. All the webcams I have here use non-USB interfaces (Firewire or some CCIR-601/626 dialect) and are essentially lag-free, and they are up to 15 years old.
      I've played around a bit with the demo Tools that come with ARToolkit, which is intended as a Toolkit for augmented reality, i.e. to insert 3D-Objects into real photos or videos. It can Identify the 3D-orientation of targets (i.e. black squares on white background with some more black-on-white patterns in the middle for identification and orientation) in real time at 30fps on my old 400MHz box. If one went and printed one target on each visible face of the "controller", one could probably use it as an input device.
      There are a few ARToolkit demo videos on youtube, e.g. one using it to overlay 3D Monsters over a collectible card game or moving a dancing manga character around on a desk.

    5. Re:Nice tech, but latency? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Nice for simple games I guess, but for serious gaming it would require special cameras with low latency.

      Perhaps it would make a good alternative to a mouse?

  6. Screw games, what about general input? -EOM by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    EOM

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  7. Clever by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 3, Informative

    People have been writing webcam tracking software for ages, some is actually open source and there's even phonecam tracking software but this the first hopeful sign I've seen for something more fun than some stupid logitech wobbly eyebrowes and a moustache!

    --
    Free Playstation 3, XBox 360 and Nintendo Wii

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:Clever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just tried to build camtrack, and it said I don't have dependencies that I have. :( Anyone out there have any better luck?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. It's.. by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's a blatant advert! It's vapourware! It's just 'eyetoy', which has been out on the Playstation for ages! It won't work in real people's houses, because people will walk past and curtains will flutter in the wind! It will never get any decent games!

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    1. Re:It's.. by angus_rg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It won't work in real people's houses, because people will walk past and curtains will flutter in the wind! If it works as said, it tracks object motion, no motion. Technology is out there for facial recognition. Tracking wouldn't be that hard, assuming it doesn't kill the CPU.

      It will never get any decent games! It's a glorified Key mapper, no one needs to support it:
      Users can then program the emulation based on the game they want to control and the object(s) they want to control the game with.
    2. Re:It's.. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      It's just 'eyetoy', which has been out on the Playstation for ages! It won't work in real people's houses, because people will walk past and curtains will flutter in the wind!

      Actually, think it through:

      Replace the sensor bar with a camera array. Put the infrared LEDs on the controller, and use a filter to cut out visible light, to avoid picking up irrelevant background events. Provide the console with the necessary computational resources to work out the complete 3D motion of the controller from this. It would give you much more detailed motion sensing.

      Problems: calibration will be a nightmare. And just as with the Wii at present, once the camera loses sight of the infrared source, you're reduced to dead reckoning with the accelerometers.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:It's.. by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 1
      Having played a few Playstation 2 to Wii conversions where button presses were mapped directly to gestures, I can tell you they are no fun, and don't work. This mainly seems to be because the timing of gestures isn't quite as accurate as the button pressing. Of course gestures add more than just a button press, but you lose that with this kind of mapping.

      This will be the same as when people used to play random games with DDR mats. It's great fun for about an hour or so, but if you actually want to finish anything, it's back to the keyboard.

      --
      Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    4. Re:It's.. by jedie · · Score: 1

      This technology relies on color for tracking different objects. It would be quite a feat to do that with IR I think. In IR all you would have at best would be what we could call "grayscale". Add to that variations in the intensity of IR light that will come up as your led moves* around and you have not much to hang on to. Especially, like you point out, when the danger exists that you leave the camera's eyesight and throw off the entire tracking thing at which point you would need very powerful algorithms (can you even imagine 4 of these very hard to track objects disappear and reappear? I'm not saying impossible, but very hard)

      Furthermore, visible-light sources also emit IR: you are going to need quite a filter to keep both sunlight IR and incandescent lightbulb IR out of there while allowing that frequency of just your IR led in. Remember you want to be able to track 4 LEDs with different frequencies...

      Then your "off the shelve" value just disappears.

      Otherwise your "array of cams" is a very good idea and perhaps (imho) the best solution would be to use 2 color and 1 IR cam and have your objects tracked in both. Furthermore the stereoscopic data will allow for much better Z-axis handling than what CamSpace does (probably looking at size of object). Again, nifty ideas but they just are no match to the "use any webcam you want" paradigm!

      PS: If this thing works in "real circumstances" i.e: not in a controlled light environment, they are on to something.

      *(don't forget it has an angle with a more intense center and more faded sides)

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
  9. Re:WIndows Only by stormguard2099 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    they say osx support and linux support are in the works to follow pretty soon right there on the website

    --
    http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
  10. There's been a few programs like this... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But, man, this one has the best user interface I've seen, by far. And the other ones are either specific motion tracking games or are otherwise specific to some small part of the problem... plugins for particular applications, and the like.

    I suspect there will be an open source clone out within six months though... possibly based on Intel's open source computer vision library.

  11. 3d telemetry? by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    interesting.

    my first thought was a black jumper, black glove, bright, UV dots at key joints and fingers with four of those webcams and some clever software, and hey presto - instant real time telemetry system.

    hook it up to a remote arm and you have one nifty method of control. (seen the movie FX2?)

    1. Re:3d telemetry? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      You really want /.ers in that getup? Really?

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  12. Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    source doesn't appear likely. So, if the source isn't available, we whine!

    This is one of those very annoying parts of the whole Open Source Movement, the whining. Good Idea, no source = whine.

    Code it yourself, and give your work away. Stop whining, please. It doesn't do the community any good when you whine.

    Seriously, if the code isn't open and it isn't going to be, start your own, and stop whining. It would be so much better if we stopped whining and posting the whines to slashdot and started to code.

    One of the side benefits of this (coding a good idea like this) would be that no company would dare release beta code, if it knew that the OSS version was on the way.

    Now, get back to coding!
    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Source by mecenday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hrm... wow, how exactly is that whining? The comment is mentioning limitations, and no source is a limitation if you're sitting on a linux box. At worst he's suggesting the same thing you are: "Let's clone this" sort of follows from "good idea, no source."

      Anyways, you're hearing whining where there is none... maybe your cubemate is a whiny linux user or something and you got some interference this morning. =)

      --
      Tautologies, they are what they are.
    2. Re:Source by Liancourt+Rocks · · Score: 1

      Especially since there is code available... At least for the machine vision part. OpenCV anyone? There are plenty of videos on youtube.

      --
      Takeshima? Dokdo? Who cares! Liancourt rocks!
    3. Re:Source by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, I'd hate to live with you if you think that's whining. AM's roommate: uh oh, looks like it's going to rain soon. AM: STOP FUCKING WHINING! I CAN'T TAKE IT!

    4. Re:Source by kuzb · · Score: 1

      The people who whine are also typically the people who are incapable of writing the software in the first place. I do however, support your statement.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    5. Re:Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. I love open source but this is clearly an idea that's gonna net these guys a fair deal of money, and if they open source it if would be just snapped up by big gaming companies who would then make money of these guy's work

      Though if they try to patent it I'll be pissed

    6. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "no source" comment is a whine. It means "I want the code for free", and "I'm too lazy or incompetent to code it myself".

      If what he meant to say was "wow, this is a great idea, who's got open source version?" then that's what he should have said, as it is much less ambiguous and actually would promote Open Source Coding. Someone (or a few) versions might come to light and those that were interested could pool resources and actually get to work on improving what exists.

      It is better to promote what IS open than it is whine about what isn't. The best way to win for OSS is for it to actually compete with better software.

      If we, the OSS community, can out-compete those developing proprietary, they'll eventually release it Open Source without us even asking (whining) for it to be open, or at least know that they will be doomed eventually to a freer and more open version.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      One can say "its going to rain" three different ways.

      1) indifference (non-caring weatherman - my brother)
      2) with glee (my wife)
      3) Whining (me)

      If one knows the source of the comment, one can deduce the mood. Taco was whining, IMHO.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is absolutely no irony in a very long whine about people whining :)

    9. Re:Source by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      no source is a limitation if you're sitting on a linux box. Not if they provide you a binary it isn't.
      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    10. Re:Source by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If what he meant to say was "wow, this is a great idea, who's got open source version?" then that's what he should have said, as it is much less ambiguous and actually would promote Open Source Coding.

      Translation: "I am intolerant of others' shortcomings in the communication department, and insist that they conform to my ideas of how people should speak or I will berate them."

      It is better to promote what IS open than it is whine about what isn't. The best way to win for OSS is for it to actually compete with better software.

      Positive reinforcement of what is good is more effective than negative reinforcement against what is bad (good and bad being as subjective as ever) but that doesn't mean that negative reinforcement doesn't work.

      If we, the OSS community, can out-compete those developing proprietary, they'll eventually release it Open Source without us even asking (whining) for it to be open

      Or, you know, just abandon and eventually lose the source code.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, i just started the anti-whine-whine club! Seriously iÂm getting tired of people whining about people whining...

      Ok, i just started the anti-whine-whine-whine club!
      Seriously iÂm getting tired of people whining about people whining about people who whine...

      rinse and repeat! Infinite discussions are just so lovely =)

    12. Re:Source by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Taco was whining, IMHO.

      And you're overly sensitive, IMHO.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, you know, just abandon and eventually lose the source code. So what? You never had the code in the first place, and if you'd develop open code originally you wouldn't care in the second place.

      The code isn't yours, so why should you care if if disappears, especially since you never had access to it in the first place?

      Your whole whine is nothing short of exactly what I'm talking about originally. Typical of many who want to decide what others can and can't do.

      I don't whine about closed source software. It is pointless to whine about it being closed, because it isn't my code. Freedom also means free to keep things closed, or else it is meaningless.
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    14. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      And you're overly sensitive, IMHO. Pot meet Kettle.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    15. Re:Source by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      That's a great non sequitor, but it means nothing except that you know you're overly sensitive. 1st reply was spot on.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    16. Re:Source by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't whine about closed source software.

      Only about people whining about closed source software?

      It is pointless to whine about it being closed, because it isn't my code.

      So your meta-whining isn't pointless?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      So your meta-meta-whining isn't pointless? ;-)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    18. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Basically it means your over sensitive to my over sensitivity. IMHO :-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    19. Re:Source by Chris+Burke · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, it means you have no better comeback than "I know you are but what am I". *yawn* Go whine some more.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:Source by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      No, it was more of a I know I am, but so are you. Not the same thing. :-P

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:Source by Facetious · · Score: 1

      So, if the source isn't available, we wine!
      There. Fixed that for ya.
      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    22. Re:Source by Tomas_Bakke · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read "if the source isn't available, we wine" ?

    23. Re:Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So, if the source isn't available, we whine!

      That, or we could WINE.

      > Now, get back to coding!

      Sir, yes Sir! I'm glad we have you so that you can whine loudly when you think others are whining.

  13. Re: Taking the wii controller to the next level by hypergreatthing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... this has nothing to do with the Wii or a controller for that matter. It's video recognition software.

    GJ.

  14. Patent infringement ? by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "one of these" isn't anything but a webcam. That's the problem too...

    Massive lawsuits coming from Sony for infringement of all patents they managed to get granted regarding the Eye Toy in :
    5 seconds...
    4...
    3...
    2...
    1...
    Take of every lawyer !
    For Great Justice !

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Patent infringement ? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The eyeToy doesn't work on the PC, so there's no loss of market share.

      If their patents cover all of these style of input devices, and not just PlayStation versions, then the patent office has a serious case of cranio-rectal inversion.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Patent infringement ? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Informative

      If their patents cover all of these style of input devices, and not just PlayStation versions, then the patent office has a serious case of cranio-rectal inversion.
       
      Have you been paying attention? This question has been settled for some time. Hence the gp's high level of confidence.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Patent infringement ? by mea37 · · Score: 1

      That they have not implemented the patent for the PC, would not mean that anyone else could implement the patent for the PC without licensing. (Unless the interface wtih the PlayStation is somehow integral to the invention or the patent is badly enough written to represent it as though it were.) Patents aren't about protecting existing marketshare. (Copyright does take impact on market value into account in the fair use criteria, and trademark has everything to do with confusion in defined markets, but those are different animals entirely.)

      I can think of two major questions that should relate to the applicability of the patent (if the system were really working as intended):

      1) Does the software operate in the manner described by the patent? This isn't about "what it does", but rather "how it does it". People (including, it would seem, the courts in some cases) forget that patents don't cover "acheiving such-and-such result"; they cover "a method of acheiving such-and-such result".

      2) Can the uses of the software be construed as falling under the types of use restricted by patent law? I'm not too familiar with how the lines have been drawn here; but for example, I can implement a patent for academic/research purposes with no license; I think I can do the same for personal use, though I'm less certain about that. On the other hand, I can't exploit the implementation commercially without a license.

    4. Re:Patent infringement ? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Optical tracking has been around forever. I work in a VR lab, there is no way Sony has a patent on the idea.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    5. Re:Patent infringement ? by Theoboley · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also, the webcam + game thing isn't anything new. I remember buying a webcam back in 1999 and it had games as such included on it like this. you sit in the little outline it has on the screen and move your arms around to pop bubbles... or whatever have you. Nothing new. Sony has no grounds for a lawsuit, as it had happened LONG before their eyetoy was ever released.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    6. Re:Patent infringement ? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might be right, but the sad fact is that it doesn't exactly matter in today's world.

    7. Re:Patent infringement ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely correct, but only for a version of reality that doesn't actually exist outside of crazed hippie hackers.

      You know, the one where being entertained is a basic human right, and everyone would be super happy to modify their software to suit their needs.

    8. Re:Patent infringement ? by rsmither · · Score: 1

      Actually, at least the original version of the EyeToy can be made to work on the PC. For Windows, it is just a matter of finding the driver (or using a generic driver and inserting the specific id string for your EyeToy).

    9. Re:Patent infringement ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'm pretty sure it does. And if it doesn't, it runs on Linux.

    10. Re:Patent infringement ? by thegoateye · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      --
      Just because I have glasses doesn't mean I will set up your home network.
  15. already done by guy5000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    eyetoy ps2

  16. PS2's EyeToy anyone ? by Vapula · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What this is doing is basically the same than the PS2 EyeToy... Maybe with a better accuracy (but, well, the hardware is more recent).

    I wonder What Sony will think about that... I guess their patent lawyers will be ready to jump on the case...

    For Information, EyeToy Antigrav tracks
    - both arms for character's arms movements
    - head movements for the character direction change
    - jump/duck to make the character do the same things...

    1. Re:PS2's EyeToy anyone ? by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I've seen similar software bundled with PC webcams since 6-7 years ago. The recognition wasn't perfect, though, and flailing your arms about with a friend would pretty much win most of the games.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
  17. Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I concluded this was a hoax as soon as they said it was reliable AND runs on Windows.

    1. Re:Oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everything seems cooler with beastie boys in the background

  18. Re: Taking the wii controller to the next level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wii controller functions partially on video recognition, but it only uses the LEDs that are located in the "sensor" bar.

  19. thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a guy who likes the open source movement, I'm well aware how those who think they love freedom really want to push rules onto other people.

    Open source = good
    close source = good

    freedom = good

    being forced to open or close one's source = bad

    1. Re:thank you. by Explodicle · · Score: 0, Troll

      those who think they love freedom really want to push rules onto other people.
      Like those who support IP laws?
    2. Re:thank you. by Surye · · Score: 1

      Which is why only BSD/MIT like licenses are the only real OSS licenses.

    3. Re:thank you. by MartinG · · Score: 1

      Having slaves = good
      Not having slaves = good

      freedom = good

      being forced to release or keep one's slaves = bad

      Of course in reality it's easy to see that slavery is bad for society as a whole even though it makes some people better off. The same is true with software freedom. In both cases, the overall freedom of society is more important than the individual right to restrict or remove the freedom of others.

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    4. Re:thank you. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      Check it out, I can make nonsensical arguments too.

      those who think they love freedom really want to push rules onto other people. Like those who support murder laws?

      How'd I do?? Seriously... all laws involve a loss of freedom. That's something we accept, because we don't want people to run around hurting others. If you disagree with IP laws, fine, but claiming that it's just "really wanting to push rules onto other people" is fscking asinine.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    5. Re:thank you. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      You know, if you didn't equate closed source software with slavery, I wouldn't have found your point so freakin ridiculous.

      I can see why you see it that way, but it's pretty easy for me to say you're wrong, because in my view, you are.

    6. Re:thank you. by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      If complaining that something should be different is the same thing as forcing someone to change it, then your own complaint is a forceful suppression of free speech, and I should call the police to have you arrested.

      Moderators, the insightful mod is for non-fallacious reasoning, not for "I like his conclusion even though his argument is idiotic." The parent post is just a troll.

    7. Re:thank you. by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      Ah, Slashdot. Where a point you don't agree with is a "troll".

    8. Re:thank you. by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      That nonsensical argument of yours lasted half a post longer than you thought it would. Instead of justifying the right of the state to limit the flow of ideas, you've made a hyperbolic strawman argument.

  20. Any camera? by Britz · · Score: 1

    I wanna see you play boxing with a 3 fps webcam.

  21. Interesting, but by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but when one looks closely at the video, it doesn't seem that the camera isn't even point at the objects that are being used as controls. Is it possible to down load the software? I'd like to try it for myself before getting to excited.

  22. audio interface by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

    this would be quite interesting to use for audio applications. have it control various knobs on some VSTs. maybe have it lock onto a guitar, so the effects and distortion actually change based on how you hold the guitar?

    also, it would be a perfect interface for a VST theremin.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  23. Software source, or SDK source? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't really see what people are griping about in terms of source, but I suppose it depends on what they're looking for. Having the software open-source would be great (but unlikely). What I'd really like to see though would be an openly available SDK so that people can take advantage of the software.

  24. N/T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  25. does it run on linux? by mehemiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    does it run on linux? mac? no? well, I'll just continue playing my Wii.

  26. Re: Taking the wii controller to the next level by galoise · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually, it's the same thing, only you use the camera as the controller.

    Add a couple accelerometers and bluetooth to any regular webcam, and you got yourself a wiimote.

    --
    entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
  27. Oh stop whining by msaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    CmdrTaco wasn't whining that the source isn't available, but he seemed disappointed the code won't be freely available. He wasn't accusing the author of immoral licensing practices.

    And why shouldn't he be disappointed? it'd be fun to play with.

    My first thought was "neat... can I play with this code?" and I'm sure my reaction wasn't unique.

    1. Re:Oh stop whining by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco wasn't whining that the source isn't available, but he seemed disappointed He was whining over his disappointment. Instead of being disappointed, he should have asked if there was anyone on /. who was working on it as OSS.

      So, who's got something going ????
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  28. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot Coffee modding will never be the same...

  29. Open Source equivalent? by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 1

    Hmm... no details on latency / throughput.
    Could this be done with AR Toolkit style glyphs as well?

    And, of course, distance FROM the camera is not captured in either case.

    --
    The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
  30. Re:WIndows Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they said in their blog that it is on their "TODO" list.

    My TODO list also includes climbing Mount Everest.

    I wonder which of us will accomplish our TODO lists first?

  31. Re:salmon is a fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, I object. A salmon is a hat. You are a mountebank and a shyster!!!!!! SEASONS GREETINGS

  32. Re:salmon is a fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giles? Gills.

    Salmon is a red slab of meat I find on my plate.
    Salmon is a red slab of meat I find in my sushi.

  33. Lolcat by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this thing can track my cat, I want to make a desktop toy out of it ...

  34. Prior Art by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the first webcam I ever bought came with some cheesy games like kick the massively laggy soccer ball. The only thing that the eyeToy should be able patent is the ability to read the cards from that CCG and other game specific applications. I doubt this hack extends into that realm.

  35. Cool yes, but hardly "the next level" by Noiprox · · Score: 1

    This is very cool technology, but imho it is a bit inflated to claim it is "the next level" beyond the Wiimote. First of all, you have to keep the objects in view of and facing the webcam at all times. If anything blocks them, or if you are tilting them away from the camera in any way, you lose control. Another big issue which has been mentioned already is latency. Also the CPU (or GPU?) cost of image analysis is very high compared to interpreting a stream of numbers from a few accelerometers, which may not be an issue on PC's but it would be on the Wii. Finally, the Wiimote has a lot more to offer than simple motion tracking: The controllers have a built-in IR camera for pointing to the screen with rotation, there is a speaker and vibration function built-in, you can use it as a remote control to turn the Wii on and off and finally you can add attachments such as the classic gamepad, or the nunchuck.

  36. I wonder if it works by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    this is a EARLY beta ... I'd love to see it work.
    The PS2 camera that did something similar only worked well under perfect lighting and even then had some problems.

    I'll wait to see this. cool if it works though.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  37. Re:WIndows Only by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    My Guess would be them getting their stuff to run with OSX and Linux. Why? because i know as a slashdot reader/poster i have no ambition to climb anything, and am assuming that most slashdotters are the same.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  38. Re:salmon is a fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, I protest. A salmon is the idea of a turtle with the wings of an anaemic fly. SEASONS GREETINGS my car is blue

  39. Processing.org by Glacial+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Processing.org is an open souce scripting language. It seems like it should be high performance since it's just a thin layer on top of gcc. One of the things it seems like it should do well is allow people to write image processing algorithms like those demonstrated in the video. Processing will do the ugly work of grabbing the framebuffer from a web cam and then gives you access to a good mix of image processsing helper functions. There also looks to be an active and helpful user base on their forum. I haven't gotten around to actually trying it out yet, but it's pretty high on my priority list. I'm sure I could find some interesting uses for it if it turns out to be as easy to use as I think it is.

    1. Re:Processing.org by b0dhi · · Score: 1

      Er, Processing is actually Java.

  40. Pitch, acceleration, etc by HalAtWork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Besides, the webcam may have a hard time tracking Z-axis direction, pitch, and acceleration in the same manner that the Wii provides. Perhaps if they let you track Wiimotes with this device it could yield greater accuracy, but then you are right about the latency issue. A neat trick, but for hard core games it won't do the trick.

    1. Re:Pitch, acceleration, etc by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps if they let you track Wiimotes with this device it could yield greater accuracy, but then you are right about the latency issue.

      Well the genius of the wiimote is that it puts the camera in the controller, and the things the camera tracks are fixed points. This makes measuring Z-axis easy (distance between the points) as well as pitch (apparent angle), using only the small wiimote.

      Whereas to measure tilt or Z, this method basically requires you to hold a sensor-bar-sized object (the steering wheels with the painted bar). In fact, you could play a lot of Wii games this way (ones that don't need the accelerometers), by holding the sensor bar in your hand and putting the wiimote on your TV. I think it's obvious why this is an inferior method.

      On the other hand, what is cool about this is that you can use just about anything as a sensor, and it's use of a cheap webcam.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Pitch, acceleration, etc by aj50 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the wiimote is somewhat limiting in it's tracking capabilities (but fortunately in a way that isn't usually apparent). The wiimote can't tell whether or not it's looking at the sensor bar from the side or not, when you move the wiimote left or right, the two lights appear to get closer together in the same way as if you'd moved it further away from the television.

      Since the wiimote is usually used from roughly in front of the TV as a pointing device, this isn't usually a problem.

      I would expect that you'd get some odd effects with Johnny Lee's head tracking application if you turn your head and look at the screen out of the corner of your eye. One possible fix would be to add a third led to form a triangle with the other two.

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    3. Re:Pitch, acceleration, etc by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Actually, the wiimote is somewhat limiting in it's tracking capabilities (but fortunately in a way that isn't usually apparent). The wiimote can't tell whether or not it's looking at the sensor bar from the side or not, when you move the wiimote left or right, the two lights appear to get closer together in the same way as if you'd moved it further away from the television.

      Since the wiimote is usually used from roughly in front of the TV as a pointing device, this isn't usually a problem.


      Well, it would only be a problem if you started off in front of the TV, and then moved over to one side. If you start playing from an angle, then there's no problem (as I know due to the setup of my living room). It's always a relative measurement.

      I think the only way around this problem would be to have two cameras, and then Z could be accurately determined at all times by the difference between the two cameras.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  41. How I take my Wiimote to the next level by ProdigySim · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's all about the Wiibrator, baby.

  42. How long before... by Catchyusername · · Score: 1

    this get incorporated into pr0n?

    1. Re:How long before... by defnoz · · Score: 1
      Sounds promising as far as

      Any object is now an input device, even your fingers. but then...

      even as small as 5mm Damn!
  43. THATS GREAT! by Hojima · · Score: 1

    Now I can play VIRTUAL Hide The Sausage!

  44. CAMSHIFT and Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bradski's been doing stuff like this at intel with his CAMSHIFT algorithm for at least 4 years.

  45. Re: Taking the wii controller to the next level by javilon · · Score: 1

    It is video recognition software used to implement a controler, so you could eventually play wii type games.

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  46. From the office of military intelligence: by skia · · Score: 1

    ...with very high accuracy and reliability (Windows only)

    In a related story, Camspace also offers speakers with unmatched audio fidelity and dynamic range (only for use in a vacuum)

    --

    --

    1. Re:From the office of military intelligence: by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 1

      ...with very high accuracy and reliability (Windows only)

      In a related story, Camspace also offers speakers with unmatched audio fidelity and dynamic range (only for use in a vacuum)

      Your edit should read...
      (only for use with vast majority of PC's on market today to recoup development costs. Remaining 5%-10% of the OS market share to be developed for at later date.)

      I don't understand why it surprises everyone developers shoot for largest market first.
    2. Re:From the office of military intelligence: by skia · · Score: 1

      If I may, I think everyone's surprise is the least of the things you're having trouble understanding.

      It's not funny that these people develop for Windows. It's funny that the post was (mis)written to look as though features like high accuracy and reliability are only available on a platform best known for the absence of these traits.

      --

      --

  47. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing new input device! You can use any object, like a tennis racket for instance to play a virtual game of tennis! Or, you could just take the racket down to the tennis courts...

  48. Re: Taking the wii controller to the next level by bencoder · · Score: 1

    that's not entirely true. The infrared sensor on the wiimote is a 1024x768 black and white cmos camera, with an ir filter on it. It also has an on board chip to do the feature extraction to figure out the position of the IR blobs, there is no way to extract the actual image data without opening the controller and taking the output from the camera directly.

  49. Re:salmon is a fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Esteemed madam Moderatore, it was to be understood by myself, forwith, that salmon, in the singular or the plurales, was the topicke, whenceforth, your modreaton is gravely unjust and an affrontery to my dignity as a humane being. SEASONS GREETINGS

  50. help us defeat russian mail orders by Hemos · · Score: 2, Informative

    hey,

    we've gotten a few reports of this and one screen shot. if anyone does see an ad for a mail order bride, please send me a screen shot if ya can, but also paste me the click-thru URL.

    thanks - address to send it to is hemos @ well, the website you're on.org

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  51. What's wrong with 30fps? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I've seen a bunch that tend to do between 22-35fps at 640x480. I guess the resolution would determine how small of a 'tracked' object you could use, but what do you need really high FPS/resolution for?

    High resolution=tracking smaller details, but most are probably going to be not too hard...

    At 30fps, that's about one frame every 33 milliseconds, which is a decent enough refresh for a lot of inputs, and less than some people get as a ping in online gaming.

  52. Israel does it again by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

    More amazing technologies out of the world's hi-tech leader ;)

  53. I'll watch your video when... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    ...I don't have to endure the pain of listening to one or more big black blokes shouting incoherently over some 7-year old playing a stylophone as a soundtrack.

    And let me know when they make a controller that grants musical taste to these people.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  54. OpenCV, anyone? by schweini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ages ago, Intel was nice enough to opensource their rather impressive computer vision library called OpenCV, which AFAIK would do the heavy lifting for programs like these. What i find strange is that i have yet to see a neat open source program that uses OpenCV - even though i think there's even a python binding to the library (but sadly no perl bindings). Anyone know of a neat biometrics software package, or computer vision in general, that is open source?

  55. HOAX?? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    I don't mean the technology so much, but if you watch the video, I think it is obvious the technology works.

    Are they really using "WEBCAMS" though? I mean look past the game and look at the images of THEM. They show full frame full motion video of themselves in the background playing in realtime. I've never used a webcam that looks ANTYHING like that.

    So I think that little webcam ontop of the screen is just for looks, but the technology is coming I guess.

  56. Even in Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's even been webcam tracking written in Flash 8 for cryin out loud....

  57. Star Wars by stas2k · · Score: 1

    Finally, I can battle darth vader and show him who's teh master. ;)

  58. Without the $250 console? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a Wii without the $250 console"

    Great! I can save $250! All I need to buy is a computer... and a webcam... and the software.. and...

    Hey! This is adding up to more than $250!

  59. Drunken.Piper by Drunken_Piper · · Score: 1

    Damn, now I need to buy straps for my hands.