It's a huge pile of "and now all we have to do is to wait for mass production of cheap graphene!". Of course, if this someday actually does happen, there will be quite a boon on technology.. that will get largely unreported by everything because everyone will be too busy looking for the newest rebootmake of another 80's movie and celebrity gossips, and people will just get into the future without actually noticing it.
By some fanatical right wings wanting to cash off it yes, but in most cases are people that have completely insane ideas like sexist air conditioners, banning halloween costumes, anti free speech protests... When its nutty enough to became the buttend of some jokes, its an SJW.
Actually, given their current status, i wouldn't be surprised if they did banned Hillary or Bernie as well due having some minor dissidence from the specific exact "inter-sectional feminism" they preach. Just use a "triggering word" by accident or defend the freedom of speech on campuses and bob's your uncle, they're now "right wing white males" on the vision of this crowd.
We're still talking about a lot of basically untested internet aware services running on your background that have a microsoft tier of security, which means it is probably exploitable the hell and back, and basically identical on every single windows 10 box.
That sounds like a gros michel banana scenario here pretty much, where someone with evil intentions would be able to abuse one of those flaws and pretty much wipe out a large quantity of windows 10 machines if not all of em in a whim.
Collectivist is the word you're looking here for, not "marxist". While marxism is indeed a collectivist movement, its not exactly the same thing as social justice. One is about labelling people "working class" or "Bourgeoisie" and pitting each other, while social justice is about grouping people by their race,gender and sexuality and applying compensations and advantages for the "groups with highest oppression score", regardless of the individual condition of the individuals on said group.
And well, in this case, the company is just using it as a buzzword, given the fact they're actually dealing with individual dynamics to avoid bloody conflicts rather than doing things like racial quotas on the company etc..
First it should be a "front door". Something that everyone knows its there, rather than a secret weaselish thing. Secondly, it must be something that not only requires possessing the actual device, but also cracking it open to access some internal header pin where you plug this "magical device" that can extract the phone password from an otherwise write only memory that can't be read by the phone itself even if you reset/voltage/clock glitch it. And finally, this "magical device" must be really secure and unable to be emulated by mere guesswork or even unlawful access to it, and must be something that is stored on a secured safe and only taken out due a court order request.
After all, society as we know it would most likely been collapsed before the attack happened, either due malicious hackers abusing the unencrypted system to a halt or some sort of orwellian nightmare system in place.
Not conservatives, but pretty much anyone that goes against a certain specific small clique that were given the keys of twitter now. It is just disguised as a political debacle, but its actually "small group of very powerful individuals vs the rest of the world."
Well, quite a few idiots derailed the term, but SJW, at least when it was originally used described a very, VERY specific kind of individual with a very specific behavior. It's not even just "progressivist", but a very specific kind of evil power hungry "progressivist", that use the "social justice power words" as means to gain power and "win internet discussions", generally twisting and warping it to benefit itself and/or close knitted social group, and using any sort of power they gain to do so, be moderation, or journalism etc etc etc.. Let's just say that if a game developer inside one of those cliques did a game about shooting black people, the clique media would still praise it as "ironic and cunning", while someone outside of the group would suffer for merely not having a black character ingame.
The heat and power consumption start to scale up exponentially from where they are. Of course, they could well start to shrink the pipelines as we probably don't need those huge things anymore.
It could be also interpreted as people that don't want to self identify on the internet being more competent into making those pull requests than the ones that do.
SJWs are just the icing on the cake of this mess. You have to remember that Win10 (and specially cortana) is actually actively spying on your every move and giving your shit to microsoft to sell to whatever pay first, and microsoft is pretty much trying to force this spyware on you with their every strength, even downloading the OS behind your back via updates and going to a point where they're actually making both intel and AMD make CPUs that only work with win10.
When someone else that is not microsoft start to have fun with all those "hidden internet services". If microsoft not trying to create an OS full of exploitable flaws fails at that quite miserably, imagine microsoft actually trying to do that.
This thing looks quite powerful. Sadly the question "can it run x86" is the first to be asked, and i would guess either intel or AMD are probably trying to answer this one.
The Ghz race is pretty much dead unless we invent better transistors. But there are other ways to raise the speed, like well actually adding more pipelines to the CPU and making it run more instructions per cycle, but this is not as "efficient" as adding more cores. I did read somewhere that every extra instruction per cycle per core doubles the core size, while adding an extra core double the performance (if people can use it).
There also other paths, like decreasing the pipeline size, which make the CPU take less time to recover from stalls, but the smaller the pipeline, less clock you can put on the chip before the transistors actual speed limit come in and crash the party.
You can also try the VLIW thing again, that allows you to create those "superinstructions that do several things at once" and increase the chip size a lot less than actual extra pipelines, but then its not x86 compatible, and its very, VERY hard to create a compiler that use it well.
Finally, there is the golden goose of getting several cores to act like a single, more powerful core, but that's a nutjob dream i think.
Slashdot Mirror
It's a huge pile of "and now all we have to do is to wait for mass production of cheap graphene!".
Of course, if this someday actually does happen, there will be quite a boon on technology.. that will get largely unreported by everything because everyone will be too busy looking for the newest rebootmake of another 80's movie and celebrity gossips, and people will just get into the future without actually noticing it.
It's a VERY slippery slope, with several, several tempting things along the way.
By some fanatical right wings wanting to cash off it yes, but in most cases are people that have completely insane ideas like sexist air conditioners, banning halloween costumes, anti free speech protests...
When its nutty enough to became the buttend of some jokes, its an SJW.
Actually, given their current status, i wouldn't be surprised if they did banned Hillary or Bernie as well due having some minor dissidence from the specific exact "inter-sectional feminism" they preach.
Just use a "triggering word" by accident or defend the freedom of speech on campuses and bob's your uncle, they're now "right wing white males" on the vision of this crowd.
SJW is a word used to describe the fanatical ones.
And the movement is getting crazier as the sane minds leave it.
Can you pay a large sum to allow ads with viruses to get whitelisted?
We're still talking about a lot of basically untested internet aware services running on your background that have a microsoft tier of security, which means it is probably exploitable the hell and back, and basically identical on every single windows 10 box.
That sounds like a gros michel banana scenario here pretty much, where someone with evil intentions would be able to abuse one of those flaws and pretty much wipe out a large quantity of windows 10 machines if not all of em in a whim.
Well, could be worse, like solar roadway articles.
Collectivist is the word you're looking here for, not "marxist".
While marxism is indeed a collectivist movement, its not exactly the same thing as social justice.
One is about labelling people "working class" or "Bourgeoisie" and pitting each other, while social justice is about grouping people by their race,gender and sexuality and applying compensations and advantages for the "groups with highest oppression score", regardless of the individual condition of the individuals on said group.
And well, in this case, the company is just using it as a buzzword, given the fact they're actually dealing with individual dynamics to avoid bloody conflicts rather than doing things like racial quotas on the company etc..
Minecraft is quite different on PC due the massive amount of mods available that expands it quite greatly.
And how many to make em actually good?
Social justice is not justice, thus why its called Social justice, rather than justice.
Same applies to politically correct versus correct.
First it should be a "front door". Something that everyone knows its there, rather than a secret weaselish thing.
Secondly, it must be something that not only requires possessing the actual device, but also cracking it open to access some internal header pin where you plug this "magical device" that can extract the phone password from an otherwise write only memory that can't be read by the phone itself even if you reset/voltage/clock glitch it.
And finally, this "magical device" must be really secure and unable to be emulated by mere guesswork or even unlawful access to it, and must be something that is stored on a secured safe and only taken out due a court order request.
After all, society as we know it would most likely been collapsed before the attack happened, either due malicious hackers abusing the unencrypted system to a halt or some sort of orwellian nightmare system in place.
Not conservatives, but pretty much anyone that goes against a certain specific small clique that were given the keys of twitter now.
It is just disguised as a political debacle, but its actually "small group of very powerful individuals vs the rest of the world."
Well, quite a few idiots derailed the term, but SJW, at least when it was originally used described a very, VERY specific kind of individual with a very specific behavior.
It's not even just "progressivist", but a very specific kind of evil power hungry "progressivist", that use the "social justice power words" as means to gain power and "win internet discussions", generally twisting and warping it to benefit itself and/or close knitted social group, and using any sort of power they gain to do so, be moderation, or journalism etc etc etc..
Let's just say that if a game developer inside one of those cliques did a game about shooting black people, the clique media would still praise it as "ironic and cunning", while someone outside of the group would suffer for merely not having a black character ingame.
The heat and power consumption start to scale up exponentially from where they are.
Of course, they could well start to shrink the pipelines as we probably don't need those huge things anymore.
It could be also interpreted as people that don't want to self identify on the internet being more competent into making those pull requests than the ones that do.
Sanders also fill the blank in quite several places now.
"Bernie bros" etc..
SJWs are just the icing on the cake of this mess.
You have to remember that Win10 (and specially cortana) is actually actively spying on your every move and giving your shit to microsoft to sell to whatever pay first, and microsoft is pretty much trying to force this spyware on you with their every strength, even downloading the OS behind your back via updates and going to a point where they're actually making both intel and AMD make CPUs that only work with win10.
When someone else that is not microsoft start to have fun with all those "hidden internet services".
If microsoft not trying to create an OS full of exploitable flaws fails at that quite miserably, imagine microsoft actually trying to do that.
This thing looks quite powerful.
Sadly the question "can it run x86" is the first to be asked, and i would guess either intel or AMD are probably trying to answer this one.
The Ghz race is pretty much dead unless we invent better transistors.
But there are other ways to raise the speed, like well actually adding more pipelines to the CPU and making it run more instructions per cycle, but this is not as "efficient" as adding more cores.
I did read somewhere that every extra instruction per cycle per core doubles the core size, while adding an extra core double the performance (if people can use it).
There also other paths, like decreasing the pipeline size, which make the CPU take less time to recover from stalls, but the smaller the pipeline, less clock you can put on the chip before the transistors actual speed limit come in and crash the party.
You can also try the VLIW thing again, that allows you to create those "superinstructions that do several things at once" and increase the chip size a lot less than actual extra pipelines, but then its not x86 compatible, and its very, VERY hard to create a compiler that use it well.
Finally, there is the golden goose of getting several cores to act like a single, more powerful core, but that's a nutjob dream i think.
Anything that can be made to make solar roadways better will make regular solar panels better.
Its just a race that can't be won.
Today is not a very good day for dave.
Not only this bullshit but the return of FTDI.