Rightm it's not a "false categorization"... sexual orientation is real. Or have people been fighting all this time over nothing?
Fighting over the definition, not the groups gathering on each of the "voting points" i.e. Male-Female, Male-Male, Female-Male, Female-Female.
If you are a Female, looking for a Male, do you really need this? A gay man wont date you. No shit. No need for a "facial scan" to tell me to avoid someone who is going to say NO anyway.
The fuck does an invasion of privacy have to do with anything else, other than that. If you want to date someone, ask them out. If they say no, is it cause they are gay? Maybe, that is for them to let you know, not use a system of biased opinion to invade someone's privacy and assume.
And lets be real: Unless this thing is 100% accurate, why even bother? Any "bias" it injects is tantamount to social stereotyping, which, congrats morons! You just successfully programmed a COMPUTER TO DO SOCIAL STEREOTYPING.
News at 11.
".... may be necessary to further significant governmental interests, and are permitted."
We understand in the age of selfish morons with a platform thinking they must voice everything as fact, but did you fail comprehensive reading class in school?
I'm Jewish, living in the deep south, and nothing like what you describe has ever even come close to happening.
She's a liar, or unhinged, fabricating victimhood to support a false narrative.
And are you retarded too? Since when is Denver in the "deep south"?
Also, both of you are idiots for anecdotal stories:
I once saw a white person help a black person, there are no racists!
I once saw a white person hang a black person, all whites are racists!
The fuck with all this false equivalency "I know someone who" or "my experience is". You all fucking deprived of oxygen just long enough to function as a vapid keyboard tester on the internet?
Surprise! You are not the only motherfuckers living here.
If you are testing on problems which were solved 20 years ago - maybe you are using the wrong tests?
Would you test using punch cards given the choice.
Bro, if you think that Priority Qs are "old", you are the problem.
Stop trying to use things like "outdated" to mean "I dont know how".
Grow some balls, dont be an A.C. and make ignorant claims about things you obviously dont even know are in use (i.e hint PQ are just heaps) when they are the literal foundation of modern caches and heaps.
I ask them questions about their courses in algorithms and what they did, and they say things like "we learned what the foundational algorithms are and how to compare their performance." Did you actually write a merge sort? "No, there's no need because every major language has that sort of thing built in."
Consider me a cultist follower of your hypothesis. 20 years in CS, the last 10 I have seen it take a sharp dive. The only explanation I have is the explosion over 15 years ago in OSS and that what you espouse is true: Everyone thinks they can develop or engineer, because the code is tied up in nice little solution blocks.
Need a sort algo? Just codeproject.com Need some bi-directional comm between remotes? Just github.com...etc....
The number of people I have turned away in the first two days of testing, who could not even write a simple priority Q... its more than disheartening.
These are the "developers" who are supposed to code my future? Fuck me! I'll be working till I die.
you guys in America are waay gone, have people living in New York going suicide for not affording health care but still refuse to pay more taxes, geez..
Bro, your comment, while appreciated for the sake of a more sane economic system, is retarded if you think you can compare a country with a landmass 1/20th that of another, with the "same" problems.
Your simplistic view is exactly why Sweden enjoys a better life, because its a simpler problem, literally, 1/20th a problem to start off with.
Because Slashdotters who hear about schools designed to train people with experience they lose their minds that 'coding' is now a VocTech level position. You can train someone in a specific skillset in a fraction of the time it takes to give them a full theoretical education.
Yeah, if you want them to pick up garbage? Or check items on a conveyor belt? You cant just teach people how to problem solve. You can teach them the tools to use to solve problems, with logic and reasoning, but you cant actually teach and/or give people logic and reasoning.
Trying to equate what I do to make your life easier, everyday, with technology, to someone who makes your life easier, at the checkout counter, is hilarious and quite most of the problem i.e. perception of how "easy" someone's job is.
Since I don't have any bad college curriculum habits, why not hire me and train me how you need the job done?
Same here. I only have 25 years of practical experience.
These places need to stop hiring people you want to UNDERPAY and hire experienced people who get the actual job done with less lip and grand design dreams.
they are not entitled to distribute any of the resulting products
If I steal a hammer and use it to build a house, the extent of punishment for stealing the hammer is a year or so in jail and/or paying for the hammer plus a fine. Home Depot can't tear down the house or stop people from living in it.
You also cannot compare a widely used, generic tool i.e. hammer with something that is unique, i.e. proprietary software, that is not easy to access or available to joe public, thus rendering your cute analogy moot.
Disney stole. They knew they stole. They made the IP laws around this very topic. They deserve everything they get.
Yours is a complete dismissal of history due to cherry picked instances.
The analogy is so banal. While the teacher was turned, someone shouted out, when no one would say who, they all got punished.
Hyperbolic? Sure, but so is your logic.
Either they have they been lying their entire institutional lives or everyone is so stupid, including you, that we just allow it to persist, for decades, centuries even? ok.
Your conflation of people's freedoms and companies' freedoms is worrying to me.
And the acceptance of the erosion of your rights, as they will indeed filter down to us, is mind numbing.
As for "corporations are not people" you need to read more.
They are now considered so via Citizen's United.
Try to understand that the world you think you live in is not the one that is reality, and that thinking this has a non-plussed affect on anyone other than a corporate entity is just hyperbolic ignorance.
If you are expecting me to defend Trump, you will be disappointed.
Yes, but you dont care because you are retarded.
Its ok, lots of you exist, though not as many as you think
You dont care that a person in power can dictate to a free owned company how to behave. Congrats, you obviously dont want to live in America where we have such freedom.
Do not worry, we wont miss you, or your retardation.
Slashdot Mirror
Rightm it's not a "false categorization"... sexual orientation is real. Or have people been fighting all this time over nothing?
Fighting over the definition, not the groups gathering on each of the "voting points" i.e. Male-Female, Male-Male, Female-Male, Female-Female.
If you are a Female, looking for a Male, do you really need this? A gay man wont date you. No shit. No need for a "facial scan" to tell me to avoid someone who is going to say NO anyway.
The fuck does an invasion of privacy have to do with anything else, other than that. If you want to date someone, ask them out. If they say no, is it cause they are gay? Maybe, that is for them to let you know, not use a system of biased opinion to invade someone's privacy and assume.
And lets be real: Unless this thing is 100% accurate, why even bother? Any "bias" it injects is tantamount to social stereotyping, which, congrats morons! You just successfully programmed a COMPUTER TO DO SOCIAL STEREOTYPING. News at 11.
Cheers.
The news element isn't that a site is down, it's that freakin' *Google* is down. If you've heard of them, you might clue in as to *why* it's news.
Well, I feel sorry for you, anonymous coward.
Its not news.
Google is, in fact, NOT down.
Just a single service, from over 100+ online ones.
You will have to watch your porn collection later.
Downdetector status is now news? wow, this place has finally sailed.
".... may be necessary to further significant governmental interests, and are permitted."
We understand in the age of selfish morons with a platform thinking they must voice everything as fact, but did you fail comprehensive reading class in school?
MAY BE is not WILL or MUST.
From a mile off, using their super awesome powers of the obvious sunglasses, as seen on Amazont.com
This is no AI.
This is a huge database of weights, which are easily manipualted to be spit out, deterministically, from a computer i.e. NOT AI.
News at 11.
Trump was right about one thing. Both sides fucking suck.
This is why we cant take you serious, Trump isnt right about anything.
Oh, and your number is completely made up bullshit unless you're arguing that rats, mice and voles are still part of our feedstock.
Look up the word BIOMASS, ass.
A better first step would be to turn off the machines that actively add carbon to the air.
So, you are gonna close your mouth hole? You are a carbon exhaust machine, maroon.
Bullshit.
I'm Jewish, living in the deep south, and nothing like what you describe has ever even come close to happening.
She's a liar, or unhinged, fabricating victimhood to support a false narrative.
And are you retarded too? Since when is Denver in the "deep south"?
Also, both of you are idiots for anecdotal stories: I once saw a white person help a black person, there are no racists!
I once saw a white person hang a black person, all whites are racists!
The fuck with all this false equivalency "I know someone who" or "my experience is". You all fucking deprived of oxygen just long enough to function as a vapid keyboard tester on the internet?
Surprise! You are not the only motherfuckers living here.
Cool that someone still stands for freedom of speech.
A Canadian Hosting company is protecting your freedom of speech in America? Lollers.
So you want someone to write a round-robin, lockless thread pool on a whiteboard in 30 minutes?
No, I want someone to KNOW HOW, logically, to solve THAT PROBLEM.
And I said DAYS, not hours. Reading comprehension is an obvious skill that has gone down with this "new" education paradigm,
If you are testing on problems which were solved 20 years ago - maybe you are using the wrong tests? Would you test using punch cards given the choice.
Bro, if you think that Priority Qs are "old", you are the problem.
Stop trying to use things like "outdated" to mean "I dont know how".
Grow some balls, dont be an A.C. and make ignorant claims about things you obviously dont even know are in use (i.e hint PQ are just heaps) when they are the literal foundation of modern caches and heaps.
Thanks for making my point.
I ask them questions about their courses in algorithms and what they did, and they say things like "we learned what the foundational algorithms are and how to compare their performance." Did you actually write a merge sort? "No, there's no need because every major language has that sort of thing built in."
Consider me a cultist follower of your hypothesis. 20 years in CS, the last 10 I have seen it take a sharp dive. The only explanation I have is the explosion over 15 years ago in OSS and that what you espouse is true: Everyone thinks they can develop or engineer, because the code is tied up in nice little solution blocks.
Need a sort algo? Just codeproject.com
Need some bi-directional comm between remotes? Just github.com...etc....
The number of people I have turned away in the first two days of testing, who could not even write a simple priority Q... its more than disheartening.
These are the "developers" who are supposed to code my future? Fuck me! I'll be working till I die.
you guys in America are waay gone, have people living in New York going suicide for not affording health care but still refuse to pay more taxes, geez..
Bro, your comment, while appreciated for the sake of a more sane economic system, is retarded if you think you can compare a country with a landmass 1/20th that of another, with the "same" problems.
Your simplistic view is exactly why Sweden enjoys a better life, because its a simpler problem, literally, 1/20th a problem to start off with.
You know what else is open source?
MY BALLS!!! Suck 'em, nerds!
No, we said source, not sores.
Because Slashdotters who hear about schools designed to train people with experience they lose their minds that 'coding' is now a VocTech level position. You can train someone in a specific skillset in a fraction of the time it takes to give them a full theoretical education.
Yeah, if you want them to pick up garbage? Or check items on a conveyor belt? You cant just teach people how to problem solve. You can teach them the tools to use to solve problems, with logic and reasoning, but you cant actually teach and/or give people logic and reasoning.
Trying to equate what I do to make your life easier, everyday, with technology, to someone who makes your life easier, at the checkout counter, is hilarious and quite most of the problem i.e. perception of how "easy" someone's job is.
Since I don't have any bad college curriculum habits, why not hire me and train me how you need the job done?
Same here. I only have 25 years of practical experience.
These places need to stop hiring people you want to UNDERPAY and hire experienced people who get the actual job done with less lip and grand design dreams.
of course, that aint gonna happen
If I steal a hammer and use it to build a house, the extent of punishment for stealing the hammer is a year or so in jail and/or paying for the hammer plus a fine. Home Depot can't tear down the house or stop people from living in it.
You also cannot compare a widely used, generic tool i.e. hammer with something that is unique, i.e. proprietary software, that is not easy to access or available to joe public, thus rendering your cute analogy moot.
Disney stole. They knew they stole. They made the IP laws around this very topic. They deserve everything they get.
I lent my pen to Bob and you stole the pen from Bob now every check you sign with that pen belongs to me. Yup, makes sense (shaking my head)...
This is an ugly analogy that fails to pass the smell test.
They didnt steal a product that ANYONE CAN BUY IN A STORE FOR 10 CENTS.
They stole tech, proprietary, not a world-wide distributed PEN.
And they KNEW they did.
Knowing is not just half the battle, its the whole intent.
This is the first I'm hearing that "treating traffic equally" means no encryption, do you have a source?
well, it is the next logical step.
If the idea is that you can downgrade certain traffic, you need to know what the traffic is in order to do so.
Knowing the source is not good enough, as proxy nodes are a thing.
I can totally see a push, if Net Neutrality goes bye bye, for less/non-existent encryption on certain streams (like Netflix).
People who dont think that can happen, are the same ones on the fence about NN in the first place.
Your fallacy is that of an appeal to authority.
Yours is a complete dismissal of history due to cherry picked instances.
The analogy is so banal. While the teacher was turned, someone shouted out, when no one would say who, they all got punished.
Hyperbolic? Sure, but so is your logic.
Either they have they been lying their entire institutional lives or everyone is so stupid, including you, that we just allow it to persist, for decades, centuries even? ok.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc not C.U.
Your conflation of people's freedoms and companies' freedoms is worrying to me.
And the acceptance of the erosion of your rights, as they will indeed filter down to us, is mind numbing.
As for "corporations are not people" you need to read more.
They are now considered so via Citizen's United.
Try to understand that the world you think you live in is not the one that is reality, and that thinking this has a non-plussed affect on anyone other than a corporate entity is just hyperbolic ignorance.
Perception is not reality. Reality is reality.
If you are expecting me to defend Trump, you will be disappointed.
Yes, but you dont care because you are retarded.
Its ok, lots of you exist, though not as many as you think
You dont care that a person in power can dictate to a free owned company how to behave. Congrats, you obviously dont want to live in America where we have such freedom.
Do not worry, we wont miss you, or your retardation.