Slashdot Mirror


User: Banjonardo

Banjonardo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
425
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 425

  1. Advertising on Gravestones Advertising Video Games? · · Score: 0, Troll

    On related news, Sierra is advertising in underwear, Blizzard buys text adds on life-saving medication and Valve buys pays to temporarily tatoo ads on newborn babes.

  2. Re:Misleading Headline on 25 More States Oppose MSFT Antitrust Dismissal · · Score: 1
    that generally supports a laise fair policy

    Since the Depression in the 30s, laissez-faire is not something anybody would ever publicly push again. Witness the New Deal laws being passed without question!

    Oh, and the religion stuff: If it gets you votes....... They'll keep doing it.

  3. Re:Misleading Headline on 25 More States Oppose MSFT Antitrust Dismissal · · Score: 1
    Pushing "States rights" have suited Republicans of late

    Wait, flaw: Republicans, since Jefferson, have been about State's Rights.

  4. Re:Voltron on I Wanna Watch Cartoons! · · Score: 1
    He-Man!

    I HAVE THE POWER!

  5. Insanity Defense on Microsoft Trial Wends Onward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Showing remarkable restraint and an unwillingness to shout 'Give it up for me!',

    Hmm, I wonder..........Insanity defense?

  6. Re:Dangerous.... on The Teddy Borg is Alive! · · Score: 1
    One of their girlfriends

    .....nah, too easy.

  7. Re:It's called kuro5hin.org on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 1
    I have a 3-digit K5 uid,

    How do you know?

    Whoops, my bad, posted anonymously. Please answer here.

  8. Re:Copy-protected PC's? on MPAA Wants Copy-Controlled PCs · · Score: 1

    Viacom owns MTV.

  9. Re:Now that will work on Fighting Spam With A 17th Century Law · · Score: 1
    Isn't it time to face the fact that the spammers don't care about the legality of their actions?

    It isn't about them repenting for their crimes and hanging their heads and all, it's about, people suing declared spammers and companies producing contraband (bulk-emailers).

    And boy, there are a lot. Yeah, it wouldn't cut all the spam, and traffic would come back soon, but we'd get some. Isn't that what this is about? Revenge and retribution?

  10. Government and ICANN on ICANN CEO Proposes Radical Changes · · Score: 1
    Hmm.....I guess the bit might with the raisethefist.com might be repeated more often.........

    If Big Brother was watching you!

    (Ominous music)

  11. Re:military battery safety on Self-Warming Jackets · · Score: 1
    Uh......if they wrap it up in kevlar..........

    Then you wouldn't need the battery. Kevlar's not exactly breathy light stuff to wear. It's heavy. You'll sweat. And it's not something wind goes through.

  12. Re:bnetd is not their product on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1

    Look, I dislike the DMCA as much as the next guy, though I'm not an American. I like blizzard's games. I buy them for enjoyment. So, as cartman would say, "Screw you."

  13. Re:Whose desktop are we talking about? on Linux *Won't* Fail on the Desktop? · · Score: 1
    Linux exists as it is today because we have designed it for our own use, not for Aunt Tillie.

    And THAT, I believe, is it's selling point.

    Linux is like using a stick shift here in the U.S. where automatics are easier to find: it's for us control freaks. It's powerful. It gives you full control.

    This is the cool part. Wanna-be 1337 h4x0r 15 year-olds (that's me!) will love being able to mess with everything.

    I'm loving my Mandrake Linux, except for the problem that it's kinda buggy. I mean, RPMs really suck on it. Maybe I should get red hat.

  14. Re:I want one. on Most Detailed Image Of Earth Yet · · Score: 1
    Actually, there's one in my little bro's room, and another in my history teacher's.

    My brother has both dark and light ones.

  15. Re:bnetd is not their product on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1
    I dunno, man, I still think they should be able to do what they deem reasonable, since there is no other way for them to enforce that.

    Say I wanna make a game, that I'm Blizzard. I want X. If I can't enforce X, I won't make the game. And we, gamers, don't want that.

    All I really care is that they're happy, so in turn I'm happy with their games.

  16. Re:Are these people on acid? on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1
    They might as well shrinkwrap their games in flashy packaging that says "Boycott us!"

    Ha, like that would stop me from buying Warcraft 3!

  17. Re:I don't think it's Battle.net, its pirated game on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1
    Blizzard doesn't make any money off its free Battle.net service

    Probably just enough from the ads on the top to pay for maintenance.

  18. Re:bnetd is not their product on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1
    My lord, that's pretty dumb.

    The industry works as follows: they make a game, and sell it on the premise that you'll play multiplayer, where they shall sell ads and get money for maintenance.

    And then someone comes along and makes it possible to multiplay circumventing their mechanism.

    Please, tell me why they should not be able to say that you cannot use their product in a way it was not projected, sold, marketed to be? I know you can do whatever you want with your things, cause you bought them, but that's just not fair to blizzard, guys who make great games.

  19. Re:Blizzard: it's been fun on Blizzard Rains on Bnetd Project · · Score: 1
    *BOINK*

    Wait, what was that? The sound of a.......

    knee jerking?

    Seriously, though, slashdot posters are so ignorant sometimes.

    "Oh, boy, a company that codes to put bread on the table isn't allowing people to emulate their software! Gosh, I'll boycott them now!"

    Jeez.

  20. Re:Wright Brothers? Give Me A Break on Re-Building the Wright Flyer · · Score: 1
    Reeeeeally? Self-powered? This is why they needed a friggin catapult?

    How would the rest of the categories be any different from Alberto Santos-Dumont, the Brazilian working in France who built a self-powered monoplane that was ages past the Kitty Hawk? Milestone, indeed.

  21. Re:Were the Wrights first? on Re-Building the Wright Flyer · · Score: 1

    Glad to know people still go to Brazil, but the aviation museum (his house) is in Petropolis, not Belo Horizonte. I assume we're talking about the same museum? The one with the staircase that's made of half-steps?

  22. Re:Were the Wrights first? on Re-Building the Wright Flyer · · Score: 1
    And Santos Dumont was a Brazilian. In fact, we Brazilians have never heard of these Wright guys. I hadn't till I moved to the U.S.

    Granted, Santos Dumont built and flew the BIS-14 in France. But the domestic (not international) airport in Rio is the Santos Dumont, (always full of traffic from the damned taxis) his house is a museum in Petropolis, etc.

  23. Re:But the French were leaders by 1912 on Re-Building the Wright Flyer · · Score: 1
    Oh, lord, I'll smack you.

    Don't trust the French: Alberto Santos-Dumont is Brazilian. And we're damned proud of him. He is considered the father of aviation in Brazil, and the French claim him as theirs since he built and flew the BIS-14 in Paris. BTW, I've been to his house in Petropolis, Brazil. Awesome staicase. Hehe, instead of full steps it has left or right platforms, so you walk up like that.

    He was a hell of an inventor.

  24. Re:Exceedingly Erratic == Unsafe on Re-Building the Wright Flyer · · Score: 2, Informative
    They used a jeep to pull it. The first self-propelled, self-take-offing airplane was Alberto Santos Dumont's BIS-14.

    He is recognized as th father of aviation in many countries, especially France and his native Brazil. (Where we have never heard of the Wright brothers. In fact, I wouldn't learn about them until I moved to the U.S. from Brazil.)

  25. Re:Futurama's other problem... on Concerning The Cancellation of Futurama · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but Fox can't give that slot up. Why? Because Malcom In The Middle kicks ass, thats why. Did you SEE the last episode?