Slashdot Mirror


Self-Warming Jackets

jeffy124 writes: "Those of you in the frigid north who find their coats unfulfilling of their duties may be interested in a self-warming jacket. By using steel microfibres woven into the fabric plus a lithium battery, heat is actually generated to as much as 114 degrees fahrenheit. The jackets, sadly, come with a nasty price -- US$500. Among those interested in purchasing are skiers (including some Olympians), and the Military."

284 comments

  1. Finally... by Rayonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    a reason to plug in my coat!

    ...what? Why are you all looking at me like that?

    1. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 US yikes! That's over $800 Canadian! Its damn cold up here!

    2. Re:Finally... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      really, I had been using hot grits!
      haha, never thought I would have the term hot grits in a post.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. microfibers, ok by twitter · · Score: 5, Funny
    for a second I thought that was steel wool. There's the poor man's version of this. Wrap yourself in steel wool and apply a lead acid battery. "Oh, ow! put it out! put it out!"

    -Do NOT do that.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  3. $500 is not awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although its not cheap either, its comparable to some of the regular leather (read: cold) jackets sold in stores.

    1. Re:$500 is not awful by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was going to say, most normal winter coats cost around 150-300 on average, so $500 isn't that bad.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:$500 is not awful by dattaway · · Score: 2

      $500 is nothing. I paid $1100 for my electric motorcycle suit. It covers me from head to toe even at 100mph in 20F on the longest rides; however, 10 amps might be a bit much for a battery not being charged.

    3. Re:$500 is not awful by Valgar · · Score: 1

      You have a full heated suit? Who makes it? I'm currently using a widder vest and gloves for heat (my Fieldsheer armored jacket and pants are pretty good insulators).

    4. Re:$500 is not awful by dattaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.gerbing.com/

      Nothing but highest recommendations. It appears it will last a lifetime. I have had this suit for this winter season and the quality appears to exceed BMW's heated vest which I have abused for two years without fail. After tearing up a widder in less than a month and fixing it several times until it could be used no more, I would go with nothing else besides BMW or Gerbing. And the heat output is incredible. Most importantly I know it will not fail on long trips. In the cold weather on a motorcycle in the middle of nowhere, quality is the difference between life and death.

      My suit has electric heated socks (which are uncomfortable by themselves,) the two piece suit which can be comfortably worn over street clothes, electric gloves (never leave home without them,) and a the collar in the jacket has extra heating and sticks inside the helmet to keep my sinuses warm. It works and is worth the investment if you like the snow.

    5. Re:$500 is not awful by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Indeed.

      I remember paying around CA$1000 for a decent parka around 1979. Of course, that, normal clothing and thermal underwear were good to around -50C. Never been out in anything colder than around -44C, though.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:$500 is not awful by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      what none of you realize is that %500.00 jacket is the same as the $29.00 polar fleece spring jacket you buy for $59.00 when you can find the most expensive one on the market... Most Polar Fleece jackets run from $10.00 to $59.00 (kmart to North Face... I guess Armani might make one more expensive to go with your Itilian Leather shoes)

      So your leather Jacket would be about $1500.00 and a good high altitude climbers jacket about $3000.00

      which would be stupid to buy, get the cheap vest and wear it under everything. Voila every jacket I own is now self heating.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:$500 is not awful by yintercept · · Score: 1

      The best jacket warmer that I know of is small, blonde...requires extensive maintenance and costs about twenty grand a year. Even so, the unit only gets the jacket up to about 98.6...It's a warm heat...

  4. Sheit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just just figured that out right now? Besides, the top of the line 300 Fleece jacket from North Face are just as good, over the long term.

    BTW, FP.

  5. I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Akardam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... but most jackets are designed to be "self heating". At least, any good REI type jacket is. They should create multiple layers of air around your body that your body heat will warm, with a protective layer outside that blocks most wind and water.

    Not to say that this isn't cool, but it seems a bit impractical. One wonders if it can sufficently operate as a normal jacket once its battery's worn out.

    1. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air-chambers hardly qualify as "self-heating"!!!
      The whole point is that this jacket is made out of your traditional high quality fabric that has these very thin fibers that have the ability to carry current through them.

      This means you get both the static insulation you expect in a jacket, plus a heater (like a much nicer electric blanket).

    2. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about the submitter either, but $500 for a good coat is well worth the price.

      Just think if emergency situations -- fall in a puddle of water while separated from the group? Just turn on the coat! If you carry another battery and use the heat sparingly, it could easily save your life....

      (Of course, REI must have been thinking the same thing when they dropped some poor guy in the snow. :-)

    3. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that's another question: How well does that jacket function after it gets wet?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      Just turning on your coat would not be
      sufficient. You need to get rid of
      the wet clothes. There is a reason why extra
      clothes is one of the 10 essentials.

      For more severe hypothermia, it will be
      necessary to warm the victim. Certainly if
      you are in a group, someone else can warm
      you up. If you are solo, your best bet will
      be to prevent that situation from ever
      occurring. And I doubt that anyone soloing
      would want to carry the extra weight for
      an emergency battery-powered heat-you-up
      blanket.

    5. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REI's great, but you're a jackass. No heat is generated by the coat, but it merely creates a barrier that makes it difficult for temeratures on either side of the jacket to equalize. It works on the same principle as a thermos.

      Whereas this product actually generates new heat.

    6. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      "For more severe hypothermia, it will be
      necessary to warm the victim. Certainly if
      you are in a group, someone else can warm
      you up. If you are solo, your best bet will
      be to prevent that situation from ever
      occurring. And I doubt that anyone soloing
      would want to carry the extra weight for
      an emergency battery-powered heat-you-up
      blanket."

      I agree with you, but I was thinking of the gold-medal winning wrestler who just recently found himself in a survival situation.

      You can read about it here:
      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ile=/ne ws/archive/2002/02/19/state1322EST7807.DTL

      He didn't have extra clothes or survival gear packed into his snowmobile. (Which would have saved his toes.)

      The least he could have done is wear this coat on the trip. Assuming it still works after it's gotten wet, that is. :-)

    7. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Mayor+McPenisman · · Score: 1, Funny

      silent falling rain
      flailing arms in crystal pool
      hypothermia

      HAIKU

      --
      [[Ay fukkand lyke ane furious Fornicatour]]
    8. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      And there is no way in hell that the
      batteries would have lasted him overnight.

      His problem was that he was unprepared and
      stupid. No amount of equipment will save
      the unprepared and foolhardy.

      Mistake number 1. He and his partner getting
      separated.

      Mistake number 2. Not being skilled/equipped
      enough to navigate once lost.

      Mistake number 3. Wandering around when he
      had no idea where the hell he was going.
      Your best bad to survival is to stay where
      you are (or find/make a nearby shelter and
      stay there).

      Mistake number 4. Falling in the river.
      Don't ask me how he managed that one.

      Mistake number 5. Not carrying sufficient
      clothing/equipment to survive the night.

      When you are out in the wild in the
      winter, you need to carry enough gear
      so that you can survive the night. It doesn't
      take much gear or much money or much weight.
      Extra water and food. Some cheap extra clothes.
      A cheap emergency blanket. A cheap emergency
      bivy sack. He can dig a snow trench (if he didn't have a snow shovel in the snow mobile, he's a moron who deserves to die in an avalanche)
      or find shelter in a tree-well.

    9. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      "Mistake number 1. He and his partner getting
      separated."

      Stupid. But, understandable if you've ever done it. Over the noise of the machine, it's very unlikely that you'll hear your best friend run into a tree, much less notice he's gone.

      "Mistake number 2. Not being skilled/equipped
      enough to navigate once lost."

      Wrestlers aren't known for their intelligence. :-)

      "Mistake number 4. Falling in the river.
      Don't ask me how he managed that one."

      From the sound of it, the combined weight of him and the snowmobile cracked the ice. He was swerving all over the river bed trying to get himself out. He panicked. Mistake 4.5.

      "He can dig a snow trench (if he didn't have a snow shovel in the snow mobile, he's a moron who deserves to die in an avalanche)
      or find shelter in a tree-well."

      From a different article, it sounds like this is what he did. Once he realized he was in Real Big Trouble (tm), he did stop and look for shelter.

      The reason I think the jacket could have done this guy good:

      The rescuers were just 200 yards away from him that same night. But hypothermia had already set in and he couldn't move enough to respond. I'm guessing that means a body core temperature of 75-80 degrees.

      Now, had he an external source of heat -- a fire, the jacket, or even just some spare clothes -- he wouldn't have even had to spend the night.

      And it gets crazy cold in Wyoming....

    10. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      Without any more info, it sounds like
      he should have been able to set up some
      sort of landmark (bright cloth on a tree)
      while setting up shelter. Or he could have
      had a whistle or a flashlight.

      But I don't know enough of the details of
      how the searchers were looking, etc., but I
      find it surprising that the searchers came that
      closed and missed him. Probably because he
      moved from where his friend had last seen him.

      So yes, maybe that jacket would have saved
      him, but most likely, something under a pound
      and under $10 would have saved him also.

      Yeah, it does get crazy cold in Wyoming.
      Colder than in the Cascades in WA. I've
      spent the night [planned] in a snow shelter
      in the mountains in WA, and I was perfectly
      cozy.

    11. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insulation != heating

    12. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That jacket's for pussy, Texazz type skibutts.

    13. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been in -40 degrees Celsius?

    14. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by tonywong · · Score: 1

      what you've described is passive. This is an active system that will make you warmer, especially when combined with the layers you mentioned.

      Unpractical as you may think it is, people up here (Edmonton, Canada) up further north will find this development to be a godsend.

    15. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by wiredog · · Score: 2
      Not to say that this isn't cool

      Well, the whole point of it is that it's warm. So, yeah, it isn't cool.

    16. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by mitheral · · Score: 1

      but $500 for a good coat is well worth the price
      Obviously someone who has cold weather experience. I paid ~C$650 for my three layer (fleece and down liners; double layer gore-tex shell) winter jacket and at the same store one can easily spend double that. Good sampling of medium high end winter wear at Mountain Equipment Co-op
      If this clothing looks like over kill you probably shouldn't be out in the wilderness in real winter.

    17. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by markmoss · · Score: 2

      I live in northern Michigan, and snowmobile accidents kill nearly as many people as car accidents around here. Much of the time you can't _see_ much from a snowmobile, because snow is blowing around, and you are riding right down in it. If snowmobilers running a clearly marked roadside or trail can run smack into a parked car or tree -- and they frequently do, sometimes at 70mph -- it could be pretty easy to get lost in more open country. Sounds like this guy got lost and wound up going down a river on thin ice. .

      For the rest, snowmobilers dress very warmly, because they are going to be enduring extreme wind-chill for hours while not moving enough to generate much body heat. Not sure about Wyoming, but I'd have no worries about surviving a night here in a _dry_ snowmobile suit and boots. I'd dig into a snowbank at night, of course, but the suit itself is warm enough until you do something stupid. In daylight, I'd hike out, making sure to open the suit up enough that I didn't sweat in it. But I know how to navigate in the woods at any season, if you don't and people are going to be looking for you, it's a better idea to make some sort of highly visible markings, then stay put.

      Trouble is, this guy got his boots full of icy water, and soaked the suit to where it wasn't much of an insulator. And maybe he had survival gear -- on the river bottom with the snowmobile...

      I doubt that a battery-operated jacket would be working after a dunking, and if it was working, that it would provide enough heat before the batteries went out. It would be much better to stuff some waterproof matches and maybe some sort of fuel in your pockets.

    18. Re:I dunno about the submitter's jacket... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Having actually been in -100 degree weather(that include wind chill, obviously) I would have given my left nut for something like this, instead we had to settle for wool thermals and nylones.

      I would imagine somebody will come out with a recharging battery that plugs into a "shoe generator".

      Now if they would add microwave pockets, I could cook a potato...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. military battery safety by steve_l · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was told by some DARPA person that one of the problems the military had with wearable tech was that a bullet which has just travelled through a lithium battery was more toxic than one which hadnt; wearing a coat with Li-ion elements is not the kind of thing you'd want to do on the battlefield. is that correct?

    1. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lithium is extremely reactive to water, so imagine what happens if a bullet coated with lithium would do to your body.

    2. Re:military battery safety by turbosaab · · Score: 1

      PURE lithium may be extremely reactive with water, but lithium ion batteries are ionized lithium (surprise surpise) in solution. I'd guess they are about as reactive as salt water (PURE sodium is very reactive with water also... burns right up).

    3. Re:military battery safety by pongo000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not just wrap the battery pack up in Kevlar? If a round gets through the Kevlar, you probably have bigger things to worry about then a few stray Li ions...

    4. Re:military battery safety by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3

      This could be countered by placing the battery somewhere where it most likely wouldn't get shot, say, the sole of a boot. Also, a bullet through a lithium battery is probably no more hazardous than a bullet through a full magazine.

    5. Re:military battery safety by PD · · Score: 5, Funny

      So put the battery in the helmet. Lead poisoning of the head is almost always fatal, so a little lithium won't hurt.

    6. Re:military battery safety by KFury · · Score: 2

      Don't get shot.

      Okay, seriously, there are a lot of out-of-the-line-of-fire jobs that would benefit from such a coat. Also, there are other battery technologies out there, shielding, batteries embedded in boots, etc...

    7. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PURE sodium is very reactive with water also... burns right up

      Whoa now... Na and NaCl are completely different compounds. Ionized lithium in solution is still lithium.

    8. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem then becomes not the round getting through the kevlar, but the kevlar wrapped battery getting through you.

    9. Re:military battery safety by gnovos · · Score: 2

      I was told by some DARPA person that one of the problems the military had with wearable tech was that a bullet which has just travelled through a lithium battery was more toxic than one which hadnt.

      Would the answer be to make a bullet-proof self-heating vest?

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    10. Re:military battery safety by GooberToo · · Score: 2

      Actually a boot is a poor place to put it. Can you say land mine. Also, hand, arm, leg and foot injuries are far more common than one would think.

    11. Re:military battery safety by dsb3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Keep the battery in your boxer shorts. Not only will it keep nice and warm, but if it gets shot you certainly won't be concerned with a little extra toxicity.

      <cringe>

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    12. Re:military battery safety by Stonehand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hrm. What vest would stop a modern rifle round? I was under the impression that most can stop a .38 or 9mm pistol round, but the remaining energy can still crack your ribs... and a rifle cartridge usually has a LOT more power.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    13. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely encapsulated in the boot sounds pretty safe to me - versus about every other place it could be placed on the body. Unless you want it stored internally. But you're on your own for that.

    14. Re:military battery safety by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

      The battery can still be crushed whilst wrapped in kevlar. The question then becomes, will the acid leak through the kevlar?

    15. Re:military battery safety by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      and salt water is Na+ ions and Cl- ions in water. Ionized Lithium is NOT the same as Lithium...same as ionized sodium (Na+) isn't the same as sodium. High school chem.

      --
      Why not fork?
    16. Re:military battery safety by loconet · · Score: 1

      How about placing the battery on a place where if you get shot, you will die anyways? ie: right on the chest like they have it right now. Wouldnt the bullet kill the person even if the batteries that it goes through are non-toxic anyways?

      --
      [alk]
    17. Re:military battery safety by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's arguing that the boot-mounted battery would be a land mine, but that if one wearing it triggered a land mine, the schrapnel (like a bullet) would be all the more deadly for having passed through it.

      Not that I'd think the survivability rate of modern land mines to be all that high... (but then, maybe not; treaties to the contrary, doesn't it do more economic harm to your opponent to leave their men legless but alive and in need of medical care?)

    18. Re:military battery safety by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      At the newseum I saw an exhibit (link sadly doesn't have item I'm goint to mention) where they had the cell phone of a reporter in the gulf war. It was an expensive sony phone, using new-at-the-time lithium batteries. The phone is shattered; you can see where the bullet entered and was stopped by the dense battery. The battery didn't violently explode with the damage.

      That gives me an idea... can you have an antibiotic and/or steriliazation suit? Not that it would help a whole lot...

    19. Re:military battery safety by lanalyst · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the 'military interest' is hogwash

      The army air corps (now air force) in WWII was testing heated flight suits - didnt use a battery but plugged into the plane itself. Funny thing then was the pilots still prefered the 'bomber jackets' after a few came back with their butts smokin (the suits actually caught fire).

      Anyway, 50 years later there's some serious space suits, flight suits, etc that can handle any extreme imagineable - they already HAVE this technology... now why would the government be interested in buying some hyped up ron popeil version from a company that's admitally in trouble financially?

      Mr Furstein trolling for investors?

    20. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that it might be a good idea place the battery over a place on your body where a buller would most likely be lethal.

      If a bullet goes through your heart. I little lithium isn't gonna make yu any deader.

      Not to be morbid or anything.....

    21. Re:military battery safety by CharlezManning · · Score: 1
      Getting shot is not exactly something you want to do on the battlefield either!

      LiIon is dangerous stuff - inflammable and probably also poisonous. It is now illegal in many/most countries to sell LiIon cells without short circuit protection circuitry because of the risk of explosion/fire. Ask uncle google about "lithium ion safety" or check out http://www.sri.com/news/releases/04-06-98.html

    22. Re:military battery safety by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Uh......if they wrap it up in kevlar..........

      Then you wouldn't need the battery. Kevlar's not exactly breathy light stuff to wear. It's heavy. You'll sweat. And it's not something wind goes through.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    23. Re:military battery safety by steve_l · · Score: 1

      laptop batteries not only have short protection, they talk I2C to the notebook bios. If ever you hack notebook bioses (not hard, usually a 16 bit risc uC which is always in some state of awake), then messages from the battery saying 'stop charging me' should always be left alone. Play with messages to/from the dock instead.

    24. Re:military battery safety by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      actually, kevlar is quite light. canoers often will pay the premium for a kevlar canoe b/c it's strength to thickness ratio is quite high. as for breathability, you're correct.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    25. Re:military battery safety by harakh · · Score: 1

      This is very true - you dont really use bullet-"proof" vests because it doesnt help when youre fighting against rifles - atleast the version that most of us will fight against (7.62mm, AK-47 etc). If you want bullet-proof you probably need a suit that is about the size that the guys in bomb-squad is wearing.

      Bullet-proof vests are good against shrapnel though from artillery fire or bombing so they're not entirely useless. just limited use against say a rifle.

      hope that helps :)

    26. Re:military battery safety by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      PFC Achilles will now demonstrate the new arctic combat fatigues...

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    27. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think they would be interested not for flight suits , where you have an external power source, but for ground troops who can't run an extension cord from home base with them.

    28. Re:military battery safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, lithium is used as a medice for some psychological disorders so it might even help

    29. Re:military battery safety by saridder · · Score: 2

      You don't necessarily die if you get shot in chest or lungs. I've spoken to war vets who have been shot in the lungs and lived. They say it just feels "hot" inside.

      --
      --- RFC 1149 Compliant.
    30. Re:military battery safety by saridder · · Score: 2

      The US military has bulletproof vests for 7.62mm rounds. I've worn them in Bosnia. They are porcelin-like, heavy plates that go on top of your Kevlar jacket. They are uncomfortable, heavy and only cover a limited area, but supposedly would stop the AK's that the locals carried.

      --
      --- RFC 1149 Compliant.
    31. Re:military battery safety by patmfitz · · Score: 1
      Why not just wrap the battery pack up in Kevlar?

      For one thing, Kevlar is not effective against rifles:

      today's modern generation of concealable body armor can provide protection in a variety of levels designed to defeat most common low- and medium-energy handgun rounds. Body armor designed to defeat rifle fire is of either semirigid or rigid construction, typically incorporating hard materials such as ceramics and metals. Because of its weight and bulkiness, it is impractical for routine use by uniformed patrol officers and is reserved for use in tactical situations where it is worn externally for short periods of time when confronted with higher level threats. ( reference)
    32. Re:military battery safety by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      When i was serving here in Germany, the vest we got we're called "Splinter and Stab protection". Granted they were not Kevlar hi-tech articles. Yet they wore in at around 20kg and we were told that any assault rifle round would rip right through your body and both sides of the vest. This may have gotten better with todays hi-tech Kevlar, but I am sure a rifle round from a very short distance would still rip right through.

      Absolutely the same is true for the helmets, be them simple sttel or hi-tech kevlar - it is just a thin piece of metal and believe me it rips...

      --
      +++ath0
    33. Re:military battery safety by tuoppi · · Score: 1

      If you look at wound ballistics, it can't hurt you much more to have some nasty chemicals involved. Specially 5.45mm NATO bullet does rather nasty mess of the target, instead of whizzing through and making a clean hole.
      These problems can be reduced though, the battery can be located so that it most likely would be on the side of the exit wound.

      What really made me wonder, was that as you have electric current going through the cloth, you will also generate electromagnetic field, which can be detected. This field could be used as one of the triggering signals for smart mines, or maybe to remotely detect where these heated troops are having a comfortable walk.

      Chemical heaters would be a solution for this, but some problems still stay; you would also have to reload chemical heaters some way, and you can't quickly turn them off.

      Idea of using the bodyheat as heat source isn't bad at all, even if it used for ages. :-) Body will also adapt into colder climate by generating more heat.

    34. Re:military battery safety by Procrasti · · Score: 1

      Talk about mood stabilisers

  7. Oh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    I thought the military used full metal jackets. Are these the replacements?

    I guess the steel mesh woven into it makes them partially metal jackets then....

  8. $500 isn't anything for many skiers by glrotate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a semi avid skier and I'm amazed at how much people spend on ski crap. $150 bucks for a pair of flimsy nylon pants (like th kind I got at Kmart for $12) isn't uncommon. So I would imagine a selfwarming jacket (if it has stylish logos) at $500 will have no problem selling.

    1. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some fleece and down gear by The North Face, Patagonia, etc. already will set you back about $500 *without* any of the fancy Li-ion heating elements!

    2. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 2, Informative

      The $150 pants you're talking about are
      probably Goretex or a Goretex clone that
      make the pants both waterproof and
      breathable. Cheap nonbreathable pants
      are fine if you aren't exerting yourself
      much, but you work up a sweat, you'll be as
      wet on the inside as on the outside.

      Normally I wear waterproof/breathable stuff
      when I'm in the mountains. I'll take the
      cheap stuff only if I want to travel really
      compact and light (i.e. trail-run), and I'll
      take the cheap stuff in addition if I am
      glissading.

    3. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Typingsux · · Score: 1
      K-mart sucks.

      nyeahh! nyeahh!

      --
      The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
    4. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Mayor+McPenisman · · Score: 0, Insightful

      fur shorn electrically
      cyborg sheep give metal wool
      what do androids dream?

      HAIKU

      --
      [[Ay fukkand lyke ane furious Fornicatour]]
    5. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have the Solstice waterproof and breathable vertical parka ($250), with zip in fleece ($80), Omnitech waterproof and breathable pants ($80), and Patagonia long underwear ($60). So ... $470. But I still wouldn't pay $500 for the self warming jacket. Even in snow I'm as warm as could be with that gear, but I can imagine for places that are colder than the local mountains.

    6. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to sit on the fence here and partly agree and party disagree. While yes, I agree that many skiers are first in line to pick up the newest and shiniest gadget - and I'm sure I've been guilty of this myself in the past - the old rule of you get what you pay for still applies. K-Mart has good prices, no argument. And the stuff you buy there often looks exactly like what you get from the outdoor outfitter place that charges substantially more. But see who's windproof and breathable jacket really is, and see who's ripstop nylon really doesn't rip. It's unfair to imply those who pay higher prices for identical LOOKING equipment are being foolish with their money.

      That being said, I still don't see a $500 jacket that will let you freeze to death should you forget to change the battery catch on.

    7. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      $500 really isn't much for jackets, realistically speaking. Leather jackets--I mean genuine quality leather jackets, not the flimsy made in Taiwan things you get at Kmart--will often cost in the $300-$500 range already. $500 for a super-high-tech battery-powered jacket wouldn't seem to be that bad for someone used to spending that much anyway just to look cool. The only question in my mind would be how long the battery lasts.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:$500 isn't anything for many skiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually those leather bomber jackets with sheepskin are pretty damn warm. In fact, Maxim magazine (or maybe Stuff) did a cold-temp test of jackets, including a bomber jacket. They took a half dozen guys off the street, stuck 'em in a big freezer wearing various jackets, and had 'em play poker for about six hours. The winner (of the temp test, not the poker game) was a giant puffy red jacket stuffed with down, but the bomber jacket was a close second. Price of the jacket: $600.

  9. North Face : Old News : Check Here by Hates · · Score: 4, Informative


    Wow! These were shown in Mens Health magazine here in the UK before Christmas...

    Slashdot/CNN need to get with the times or get more healthy! Check it out!

    MET 5 Jacket

    1. Re:North Face : Old News : Check Here by RestiffBard · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm thinking Men's Health is not your typical slashdotter magazine. :)

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    2. Re:North Face : Old News : Check Here by Hates · · Score: 1

      Yeah, true...

      But to be honest I didn't think it was worth Slashdot's time :) Just as I don't think the original submission of the story is...

    3. Re:North Face : Old News : Check Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men's Health is the equivalent of Cosmo for men. It's written for those who are highly insecure about their bodies and sexual performance.

    4. Re:North Face : Old News : Check Here by zargag · · Score: 1

      Really? I read mens health and /.

  10. Back To The Future 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of that talking jacket in BTTF2:

    "Drying... jacket drying... your jacket is now dry."

  11. Batman had this years ago. by YourMissionForToday · · Score: 1, Funny

    When Batman went to fight the order of St. Dumas in the Sword of Azrael miniseries, he carried a special version of his Bat-suit that had the same technology. Leave it to the fucking Canadians to rip off something from a truly gifted American innovator like Bruce Wayne.

    1. Re:Batman had this years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why hasn't Bruce submitted a bid for a US Government contract, so he can become /really/ rich... imagine flipping through the GSA catalog and seeing something like "Bat-Anti-Cold-Anti-Penguin-Gas-Anti-Anthrax" sweater vest, available in red white blue and gray? Only $15,172, or 10,012,332,111,012,333.21 Euroshits.

      I'd buy that.

    2. Re:Batman had this years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to the fucking Canadians to rip off something from a truly gifted American innovator like Bruce Wayne.

      Have you ever noticed that you never see Ronald Reagan and Batman together? Hmmm....

    3. Re:Batman had this years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see them in different places simultaneously in The Dark Knight Returns (e.g., pg. 119).

  12. even cooler...err warmer? by crystalplague · · Score: 1

    the jackets filled with the aerogels made in micro gravity. sadly, they cost more like $5000 though.

  13. Source of heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the heat actually produced by the current running through the metal strands, or does the wearer get the sensation of heat due to the electro-magnetic field interacting with his tissue/cells?

    1. Re:Source of heat? by Derkec · · Score: 2

      I bet the heat is done by running current through the strands. That's how an electric blanket works - more or less.

  14. Fuel cells!! by thefleau · · Score: 1

    Replace the lithium batteries with a small methanol fuel cell easely rechargable and that last 10 time longer and you have the ultimate jacket. hehe

    1. Re:Fuel cells!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or replace the methanol with menthol, and it will also clear up that rhasping cough and sore throat!

    2. Re:Fuel cells!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, power it by methane, and include a special *ahem* charger attachment at the rear.

  15. Pricey? by stapedium · · Score: 1

    $500 really isn't bad when you consider the prices people paid for first generation Gore-Tex jackets. I'd just worry about shorting it out and bursting into flames.

  16. Murphy by trustno_one · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is a not so good idea.

    - Batteries work very bad/not at all in cold conditions, you world have to keep the entire resupply of batteries inside the jacket.

    - Adds complexity, will probably not work when it is really needed (Murphys laws of combat)

    - Cotton still works very well from -15 deg C
    to -30 -15 deg C, in fact t-shirt, jacket and winter camo works quite well if walking.

    - May be usable as a emergency blanket, if you need to reheat someone suffering from mild hypothermia. Having tried that once, it was not very pleasant.

    1. Re:Murphy by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      "- Batteries work very bad/not at all in cold conditions, you world have to keep the entire resupply of batteries inside the jacket."

      Well, the battery would be right next to the core of your body, so presumably they would be warm enough to heat the jacket. (And in turn, heat themselves.)

      "Cotton still works very well from -15 deg C"

      You've got to be kidding. Do you have any idea how many soldiers and weekend warriors would die in the wilderness if you sent them out wearing cotton?

      Cotton soaks up water. That means if you sweat at all, they'll find the body sometime in the spring.

      "Having tried that once, it was not very pleasant."

      You didn't happen to be wearing cotton, were you?

      :-)

    2. Re:Murphy by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 2, Informative

      Never use cotton in cold/wet conditions.
      It is very poor at keeping heat in when
      wet. And it is slow to dry. Polyester
      or fancy wicking fabrics function much better.
      You can find cheap polyester shirts/underpants
      for near the same price as cotton.

    3. Re:Murphy by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      You should not have to reheat someone
      suffering from mild hypothermia. Given
      dry clothes, water, and calories, and
      brought out of the wind, they should be
      able to heat themselves up on their own.

      If they really needed to be reheated, their
      hypothermia was not by any means mild.

    4. Re:Murphy by Performer+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So put the battery INSIDE the jacket. It'll be snug as a bug in there and be operating at ideal temperatures.

    5. Re:Murphy by jheinen · · Score: 2

      "- Cotton still works very well from -15 deg C
      to -30 -15 deg C, in fact t-shirt, jacket and winter camo works quite well if walking."


      Cotton sucks as a cold weather textile. Period.

      Aside from that, the problem is not when you're walking or active, but rather when you're sitting in a wet foxhole for three days. Even during a mild North Carolina winter with the temperature still well above freezing, sitting wet and motionless will quickly induce hypothermia.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    6. Re: Murphy by Totto · · Score: 1

      >Never use cotton in cold/wet conditions.
      >It is very poor at keeping heat in when
      >wet. And it is slow to dry.

      Hailing from a chilly climate and spending a lot of time in the mountains, I would like to make a correction to that.

      My 100% cotton anorak is an *EXCELLENT* garment in bad weather. The only requirement is that the weather is sufficiently cold that it does NOT get wet. Same goes for my cotton pants and gaiters.

      Since I've used this at temperatures down to -40 and altitudes upwards of 22000 ft., I'll cheerfully state that I believe it to be excellent against cold.

      Other than that, I am not impressed by the idea of a battery-heated jacket; properly clothed and staying in motion cold ought not really be a problem unless it is very extreme, in which case the batteries will take a solid performance hit. In either case one's extremities (toes, fingers, nose) will be the body parts most vulnerable to cold.

      Finally, chemical heat-pads are quite excellent for a quick burst of heating (+50 deg C or so, for half an hour, reusable).

    7. Re:Murphy by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this was the point of the military application..

      the armymen are not going to be jogging, doing jumping jacks, etc.. they are going to be sitting in a ditch full of ice and snow, while a blizzard of snow and small bullet shaped pieces of lead fly overhead. you are not moving while you wait it out in a foxhole... so you dont generate heat and you get hypothermia even with 32" of polar fleece wrapped around you. All military footsoldiers have never fought a hard war. in reality, if you are fighting a ground war in a very cold region (because the enemy has been shooting every plane we have out of the sky, and the country is too far inland for the Iowa to lob Volkswagen Bug sized projectiles all over. so far we've fought countries that have no abilities, so in the event we actually have to fight a real ground war this technology would be a life saver. plus it would be a morale booster, which is more important that health during combat.. A warm soldier is a fighting soldier. I pray that we never again fight a war that is anything like the conditions were during WW-II,Vietmnam,Korea..as I am certian that our ground troops are not ready for such conditions.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Murphy by Dr_b_ · · Score: 1

      I live in Germany, and was suffering from the cold weather, because I was used to living in Texas where its uber hot. So I bought one of these jackets. The heat panels are only in the front, the back is not heated. I wear the coat for short trips and when i go walking and its cold. You find yourself not caring how cold it is outside.

      The batteries seem to last a long time, the jacket really does get warm. Sometimes you have to have extra heat, where body heat/insulation type jackets just don't cut it. The jacket is very wearable, 'cept for a bit of a tit fight around the armpit area.

    9. Re:Murphy by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

      Everyone's forgetting the battery also generates heat, which you want to capture and use ...

      Batteries are not very efficent, but thanks to our friend thermo-dynamics those losses are converted to heat...

      ... Now the reason you want active heating is simple, many of the tasks they are talking about fall under the category of hurry up and wait.

      A bit of background, one of my hobbies is caving in the northeast. The caves year round are mid 40's, wet, 100% humidity. When things go wrong you and the injured party can be stranded for long periods of time sitting arround while things are done to extract said party. The cold rocks and mud will just suck the heat out of your body faster than you can generate it. Tricks we use are, use 'space blankets (aluminized mylar, trash bags work just as well)', minimize physical contact with the cold rock (roll them on there side, sit on your helmet, on a pack, foam pad, ect), try to move the injured party out of any standing water, put a wool or fleece cap on (a large percentage of your non contact heat loss), use active heating if possible (candles, carbide (old miner's) lamps, heat packs (reusable, single use ones eat O2), remove any wet items that do not hold heat (wet COTTON!!, it will kill you faster than you can get out of the cave). A large percentage of an extraction involves waiting for the right tools to end up in the correct position ... ie you are ready to go, but the injured party is not on the stretcher, or the rope for raising the stretcher is not in position, or the rope is rigged, but the party has not arrived yet, ect...

      Why do you need active heating, becuase an enviroment like this will suck the heat out of you faster than you can generate it. As for a battery powered heater, I suppose if you could get the battery life up there. But then you have to lug arround extra weight, and if you are doing that, Carbide is lighter... and has a nice yellow flame.

      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  17. Side effects... by gutigre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happens if you turn the jacket "on" when nobody's wearing it? This thing must generate lots of heat in a small amount of time. My chem lab experience make me think the jacket might start to melt or burn...

    1. Re:Side effects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      114 degrees is not hot enough to melt most materials used for clothing. Do you think the manufacturer didn't consider liability when developing the product?

    2. Re:Side effects... by gutigre · · Score: 1

      114 degrees is not hot enough to melt most materials used for clothing. Do you think the manufacturer didn't consider liability when developing the product?

      114 degrees when in contact with what? That's the question. I suspect they're talking about a person's body, not the open air.

    3. Re:Side effects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's 114 degrees against a person's body, it will probably be less if it is just left hanging up or in a pile on the floor. Remember, people generate heat constantly.

    4. Re:Side effects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much is 114 F in a real unit that the rest of the world is familiar with, like C or K?

  18. Yes, but.. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    What the Butt Naked Brigade actually ordered was a warmer for their --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  19. Skier Money by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

    I certainly agree - many of my wealthier friends ski, and the resort prices they pay often astounds me. These are frequently also the people slightly on the larger, lazier side, less inclined toward the difficult skiing likely to warm them. Any additional convience would be worth their money. Aside from that, everyone wants to be the first to say "I not only have my three condos and courtside seats and season passes, but I also have a self warming jacket." Beat that, Joneses!

    1. Re:Skier Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I certainly agree - many of my wealthier friends ski, and the resort prices they pay often astounds me. These are frequently also the people slightly on the larger, lazier side, less inclined toward the difficult skiing likely to warm them. Any additional convience would be worth their money. Aside from that, everyone wants to be the first to say "I not only have my three condos and courtside seats and season passes, but I also have a self warming jacket." Beat that, Joneses!
      It sounds like you're jealous. Actually I don't really think that, but I'm speaking for all the wealthy lazy people out there who are thinking as much but are too ashamed to post as much non-anonymously.
    2. Re:Skier Money by jf.lauzon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It really depens on how many years you will wear that jacket. Example: I bought my jacket (not a north face but a kanuk, anyway...) at 340$CAN and I've been wearing it for 5 years. That's nearly 70$CAN per year.

      So at 500$US for 5 years or more, that seems like a good investment.

  20. Finally... by neonstz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally I can stop using methane to heat up my pants.

  21. Next at 11 by LiquidPC · · Score: 1

    6 months later...
    Man catches on fire while falling asleep in new "self-warming" jacket.

  22. Benefits of Electric Clothing by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off let me say that I wear electric clothing on a regular basis. Of course, mine is the somewhat low-tech variety. More cheap electric blanket, less lithium-ion.

    The main reason I wear them, is for when you need to be stationary in the elements for an extended period of time. Sure, I'd be warm if I were moving about, but if you have to sit still for 60 minutes it's going to take a *LOT* of insulation to equal the warmth of a good electric vest.

    There's another subtle difference between heavy insulation and active heating. Alterness. You'd be amazed at how fast your reaction time sinks when you get a little cold. That's not so bad when your hiking along a trail, but if you're driving a motorcycle (like me) or holding a gun (soliders) then a half second can be critical.

    1. Re:Benefits of Electric Clothing by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 0

      Holy crap to that userid.

  23. Frigid North? by ari_j · · Score: 1

    What about those Slashdotters in the Frigid South? It gets cold two directions, remember, and fall is upon those down under pretty soon.

  24. battery size by gmkeegan · · Score: 1

    just make sure you don't overdo the voltage; you wouldn't want to end up with a waffle iron pattern on the skin underneath!

    When in doubt, do like the doubters do

  25. When they extend their line by LadyLucky · · Score: 2
    To underpants that are warm, then maybe I'll be interested.

    Mmmmmm... toasty warm.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    1. Re:When they extend their line by Ravagin · · Score: 2

      Mmm... electrocution. :)

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

  26. Let's not forget... by BuckleUp · · Score: 1

    That you need to buy the $400 "Light Parka" to zip this thing into, bringing the grand total to $900. And that's not even including the price of Lithium batteries

  27. What happens in a thunderstorm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Would it act as a Faraday Cage, or a lightning rod?

    Any volunteers to be experimental subjects?

    Heck, lightning isn't unknown in snowstorms, either...

  28. Now they just need to make gloves! by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person here who's hands are always cold, (even more so outside during the winter)?

    Maybe I should send them an email about it? =)

    1. Re:Now they just need to make gloves! by rehannan · · Score: 1
      Am I the only person here who's hands are always cold, (even more so outside during the winter)?


      Nope. But, they are going to make gloves. Sometime in the next year or so, I think. I'll snatch up a couple pair when they come up because my hands get damn cold surveying in Alaska during the winter... The electric gloves that are out now are too bulky to be of any use.

    2. Re:Now they just need to make gloves! by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      What about chemical hand warmers? They seem
      to be pretty popular.

      I've never used them though -- my hands stay
      pretty warm. Often, thin polypro liners are
      all that I need when out in the mountains
      in the winter.

    3. Re:Now they just need to make gloves! by rehannan · · Score: 1

      I've tried chemical hand warmers and they help some. I slip them underneath my thin gloves on the back of my hand. My problem is finding gloves that are warm *and* still allow plenty of dexterity (I need to be able to write and punch buttons). They need to work in everything from +25F and windy to -25F and calm. Hopefully the boss man wouldn't want to send us out in anything colder than that... :)

    4. Re:Now they just need to make gloves! by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      i assume you've looked at Outdoor Research's
      gloves and mitts? They have some that fold
      back, have open fingertps, etc.

    5. Re:Now they just need to make gloves! by rehannan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, OR has some pretty good stuff. I've got some folding-finger type gloves, but then the tips of my fingers get cold. :) I think I'm going to try one of those tubes you hang on your waist to stick your hands in (some football players use them). Stick a couple of those chemical hand warmers in there and it should be right toasty.

      Fortunately, I don't work all winter, so I don't have to worry about it *too* much. No frostbite problems reading /. now is there? :)

  29. Remember the socks? by restive · · Score: 1

    I had a friend when I was a kid...camping gadget freaks, we were...that had these socks you put batteries in and they supposedly kept your feet warm. I made fun of them, because I couldn't imagine lugging around batteries around your feet!

    I don't remember what kind of batteries they used, but they obviously didn't go anywhere (that I'm aware, anyway).

    This jacket is the same thing...big deal...they found ANOTHER weird idea that they can sell to people with too much money just because it sounds interesting.

    Now, if that jacket was actually a flexible circuit board that ran Linux....

    1. Re:Remember the socks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now, if that jacket was actually a flexible circuit board that ran Linux....
      imagine a Beo...

  30. Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes perfect sense.

    I'm looking into buying a Testarossa.
    I figure I have another 40 years to live,
    so if I calcute....

    With logic like this, any idiotic spending can be justified. Ever work for the government?

    1. Re:Absolutely! by jf.lauzon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sure can take things out of context. Ever work for a newspaper/tv?

  31. I've always wanted... by Ruis · · Score: 1

    ...a self-warming toilet seat.

    1. Re:I've always wanted... by hatmouse · · Score: 1

      you might find what you need here http://home.att.net/~toyletbowlbbs/toilets2.htm

  32. Does it generate a magnetic field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious, with all the unknowns of magnetic fields causing cancer and such.

    Maybe even if it has a field, it's not very strong since it just runs on batteries.

    I dunno, could make you steril... but warm.

  33. My kinda site! by KDENCE · · Score: 0

    Man, I just hooked up with slashdot a few days ago thinking I could do to have some nerd type conversation in my life and today has been the best day ever. I feel like I am back at military.com, I was able to check out 2 military related articles on this site, SWEET! and even got an updated Matrix site, SWEETER! Man we are giving the boys some mac & cheese MRE's, maybe some scrambled eggs also and now heated jackets also, man bring on soddom and that bin ladle guy, we are definetely gonna kick some gluteus maximus now. To all those that are tired of reading my military perspective sorry, to all who like it OOHRAH! Semper Fi all and good night!

    1. Re:My kinda site! by NotMostlyHere · · Score: 1

      See why I'm always on it?

    2. Re:My kinda site! by KDENCE · · Score: 0

      no!

  34. Nothing new for motorcyclists by dstone · · Score: 3, Informative

    I ride year round and it's frequently cold enough to put on my electric vest under my motorcycle jacket. These things are a life-saver and they're pretty low-tech, with fine wires laid out in an electric blanket configuration surrounding your torso. Of course, I guess this approach to keeping warm is much easier to pull off when you're riding a high-current, 400+ pound battery on wheels...

    1. Re:Nothing new for motorcyclists by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Not so easy on a touring bike (BMW K12LT) with CD Player, cruise, ABS, fuel injection, and two riders, both with full body heating, heated seats, and heated grips.

      I haven't tried it, but I imagine that a full load like that would seriously tax the charging system:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Nothing new for motorcyclists by smcdow · · Score: 1
      Not so easy on a touring bike (BMW K12LT)...

      Whoa, man, those things come with, like, a 900W alternator, same as in automobiles. I doubt that your heated jacket will be a problem. Check the user's manual for the accessory plug specs against that of the jacket.

      I used to have a R1100GS, and on those looooong cross-country trips (TX to WA) in cold weather, I think of heated jackets are pretty much standard equiment. Along with Aerostich suits. YMMV.

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    3. Re:Nothing new for motorcyclists by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Bike is at my father's house right now, or I would check....

      I wasn't saying that *A* heated vest would cause problems. I was saying that two heated suits (pants, vest/jacket, and gloves) plus heated grips, ABS, CD Player, cruise, fuel injection, running lights, radar detector, and GPS together might cause a problem.

      Also, check out what's going on with cars. No longer are those 12v systems enough. Many are trying to move towards a 42v (?) system that can handle all of the toys on modern cars.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  35. Only $500 by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    When I see 'Nasty' and 'Price' and only '$500' when refering to a jacket, I think, "damn, someone hasn't been to the store in a decade." Go price a decent Columbia ski parka.

    Reminds me of the bit on Jimmy Buffett's Feeding Frenzy CD, where he refers to his first pickup truck costing less than a pair of sneakers today. Which, if you go look, the new Nike's are less than you can pay for an actual running car.

    Now whether you actually need each, that's another question. If I want to stay warm I eat carbs and wear a well insulated jacket.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  36. Back to the Future by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

    I think somebody must have found that jacket Marty McFly brought back from the future. They just need to install a blow-dryer in this baby and we'll be all set.

    1. Re:Back to the Future by James+Foster · · Score: 2

      "They just need to install a blow-dryer in this baby and we'll be all set."

      You forgot the auto-adjust feature... can't leave that one out. ;]

      This is interesting, though. What if clothes do get electronic features integrated into them in the future? Will it really be for the better? Nowdays you can put on a wooly jumper and feel a natural warmth, but to me the idea of a completely synthetic piece of clothing which relies on electronic heating just seems to have something lacking. It's not natural. I don't want to feel like I'm wearing a computer (despite my obsession with computers and electronics).

  37. Substitute 'are more than' for 'are less than' by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Yeah, it's a gaffe. I meant to type an actual running car is less than a pair of Nike's but I'm tired. Or you can just ignore this post and point out the error for my own benefit and thousands of others who couldn't figure out what I mean.

    And, BTW, my last Columbia Parka cost about $350, on sale, shell and liner, 2 winters ago. Don't even bother to price sports logo stuff if this shocks you, it's worse.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Substitute 'are more than' for 'are less than' by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      The best is idiots paying more than $500 for some crappy jacket with a billboard for "Avirex" on the back... And then they are afraid to go outside in it because it might get messed up or rained on or something.

      I have a First Down jacket that I was able to get cheap cause the store had a sale AND it was in the "irregular" bin, but I feel dumb enough wearing it cause it is the same brand some of these kids wear to show off that they can afford a jacket or something. Once I was bored on the bus and I was sitting next to one of these dumbass kids... In my boredom I took off my jacket and started ripping off all the "First Down" labels and tags that I could, this kid got shocked and he starts cursing at me and stuff... Hilarious...

      Same kind of kids that buy the "Timberland" boots and leave that stupid leather keychain looking tag on, just so they can show off their newest "Tim'"s with all the logos they can.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Substitute 'are more than' for 'are less than' by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      heh, i know some climbers that are too
      embarrassed to take brand-new clothes/boots
      to the mountains that they muddy them first.

    3. Re:Substitute 'are more than' for 'are less than' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that some new form of haiku? Or are you unfamiliar with word wrap?

  38. Integrate it with laptops. by torpor · · Score: 3, Funny

    My titanium puts out a lot of heat - and I'm moving to Europe soon (Germany) - so I know it'll function quite nicely as a bed-warmer during those long nights.

    Plus it plays DVD's, so in all it's pretty much like snuggling up in front of the fire and watching a movie ... in a tight little package.

    If they could one day *use* the heat that these sorts of devices put out, instead of trying hard to reduce it, things might become a little more efficient ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Integrate it with laptops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing beats the heat & passions of a real woman.

  39. Bah... by istartedi · · Score: 2

    ...I haven't worn a jacket for several years now. Of course, I live in Northern VA, near Washington DC which doesn't really qualify as the frigid north. This winter has been rather warm, but I didn't wear a jacket last year when we had a good solid month of cold in December (ice on the canal was thick enough to skate). How do I do it?

    Well, first of all, I find that I just don't spend that much time walking from the car to the inside. If you get that cold walking outside for a few minutes, you are a wimp. There is simply no other way to put it.

    Well you say, what about when you are doing non-wimpy things like hiking along the banks of the semi-frozen Potomac?

    In situations like that, I layer. Sometimes as much as 5 or 6 layers. More often than not, I end up pealing them off as the physical activity causes body temp to increase. In an extreme situation (e.g., hiking up the Blue Ridge) body temperature increases to the point where I have gone shirtless in 20 degree weather just for the thrill of it. You have to be doing heavy aerobic climbing for that to be comfortable though. No, I'm not overweight either. It is essential to pack several T-shirts and change the innermost layer if you are going to rest during such an outing. Otherwise the moisture can really get to you.

    My only special equipment for dealing with the cold is a warm cotton hat to cover my ears, and gloves. That takes care of most of the body heat loss.

    I can see how something like that jacket would be useful in Minessota, especially if you did a lot of driving and were concerned about getting stranded in the middle of a blizzard.

    For me though, I've found that most special Winter clothing is something I can do without. More Winters like this one, and I may not even have to endure much discomfort to save a few bucks.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Bah... by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about windchill. When it's
      gusting 40-50 mph, it can get quite cold.
      On top of a big mountain, the gusts can top
      100 mph in bad weather.

      That's also why the motorcyclists posting
      here are all for this product... their
      bikes create the wind.

    2. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't worn a jacket for several years now...
      How do I do it?

      Somehow I get the feeling you haven't been out of the house in several years.

    3. Re:Bah... by dstone · · Score: 2

      Two things...

      1) Inexpensive electric clothing for motorcyclists have been around for many, many years. It's easy to do when you're riding on top of a big, heavy, high-current battery.

      2) You might consider letting HTML word wrap your posts for you. It looks better and makes them easier to read.

    4. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your body would generate enough heat just walking around down to -20C or so. Wind chill is another matter. I think electric ear muffs, ski mask and hats would be more useful as anyone living in the north should know 60% of the body heat escape from your head. At -20C and below, this is the most efficient way of warming the body.

      The only use of this jacket to consumers are for drivers that have to walk only 50 feet to their car.

  40. A few things : by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    First, heat is NOT the same as temperature. (grabs a physic textbook)

    Temperature = mass/(3k)(v^2), where v is the average root mean squared velocity of the gas

    Internal energy = 3/2nRT, with n in moles, R a constant, and T in Kelvin

    Finally, HEAT actually refers to the TRANSFER of energy, it is NOT a state variable : that is, a system can "have" a temperature but it CANNOT have "heat". A system CAN have an internal energy state, and as you TRANSFER energy via heat, the internal energy changes via :

    Internal energy = Heat - Work, with work referring to work done ON the surroundings by the system.

    So there.

    What purpose do the steel wires serve? They could be used to generate the heat directly, merely by passing current directly through the skinny woven wires. That sounds like the method that would spread the heat the most evenly. However, its also possible that they are merely being used as conductors to transfer the heat from heating elements located near the battery pack.

    I saw one MAJOR flaw in the jacket : the battery is located outside the garmet. Since most batteries have a significant internal resistance and are inherently inefficient, that means a considerable amount of the heat energy produced is being wasted. The battery pack should be located inside the jacket to improve its performance and to reclaim the waste heat.

    The big problem with this idea is that the power density in J/kg of lithium batteries is terrible compared to more dense fuels such as butane or gasoline. A more effective system could work by actually burning a fuel inside a tiny, protected combustion chamber designed to shield the wearer from the open flame and prevent the flame from going on.

    1. Re:A few things : by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Conduction of heat might be irrelevant considering the heating elements draw pretty much the same current in our environment. What I have found with electric clothing over the years is the amount of wattage rules. The layers of clothing over the heated liner multiplies that effect. Try 100mph at 20F for several hundred miles on a motorcycle and a great appreciation for raw power with wind resistant insualtion can do. It can mean the difference between comfort or death.

    2. Re:A few things : by RJR · · Score: 1

      ShooterNeo,

      Thank you for posting a concise description of the transfer of energy.

      Your last paragraph describing a butane/gasoline combustion chamber is the model of a hand/body-part warmer I purchased three decades ago. It used common cigarette lighter fuel and a rather complex method of steel on flint to ignite the chamber which is now subject to "child-protection" locks on your favorite brand of BIC lighters.. The spare "pint" of fuel could also be used as an emergency flair should one want to be noticed by airborne rescue.

      The heat-generating jacket might not be desirable in a hostile military situation negating fears of the projectile passing the Kelvar protected lithium through ones body.

      Many have denigrated cotton in this thread as retaining water in the form of sweat. If I recall correctly, scuba divers rely on water *inside* their wet-suits to keep them warm.

      Even when the temperature is mid-eighty (F,) I find myself chilled and confronted by a cotton towel,

      Motorcycles have also been mentioned. In my opinion, they are inexperienced as riding in the slip-stream of a large truck greatly reduces the need for special clothing; the wind being nil and the heat generated by the truck sufficient for warmth. Of course, riding five to ten feet behind a truck is not for the inexperienced or the faint of heart.

      Back to the article posted. I have never been a fan of those sleeveless jackets. While they do provide protection against upper respiratory infraction, the human body vacates heat in the feet, head and hands, in that order: When I sleep and feel an elevated temperature, I expose my feet to the open air to regulate my body temperature. When the ambient temperature is mid-ninety, placing my feet in 30,000 gallons of eighty degree water is sufficient to adjust my body temperature. Your mileage may vary.

      I own three Eddie Bauer Coats; the eldest dating back three decades. It cost $US300. The most recent is a decade old. They each have their temperature range and buoyancy. When I inquired about obtaining a new "hood," the manager told me that he did not have *any* coat in my knee-length style which brought *envy* to everyone in the store. So I bought a knit cap.

      114 degrees unregulated can cause damage if left unchecked. Methinks the article meant to say that 114 degrees might compensate for the differential of 98.6F and -40C.

      Someone in this thread mentioned dropping in water. A friend of mine did that (Navy Trained) and drowned trying to save his dog on an ice floe. The first thing I would pitch in freezing water is *anything* that might hold me down; coat (electric or otherwise,) shoes (My Timberland boots have served me well) and the twenty pounds of Exide batteries.

      The EB Goose Down does provide minimal flotation. ScotchGuard provides a few extra seconds, but I am not willing to be dropped into a crevice of a glacier to test the speculation.

      For those who are interested, an AC (Alternating Current) blanket disturbs my sleep, and NO it does not "buzz" or make any noises.

      Bob

  41. True that, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ionized Li, in or out of solution, is still lithium, that's true, but since it's outer shell (2s2) is emptied, it attains a positive charge and BEHAVES ELECTRICALLY LIKE HELIUM, AN INERT GAS.

    P.S.: In Sodium Chloride, (NaCl or Na+ Cl-) the Sodium (an alkali metal from group 1, or 1A as they used to call it) surrenders it's outermost electron to empty it's outer shell (and thereby stabilize and become unreactive) over to the Chlorine atom, making a sodium (Na+) cation, or positive ion, and the chlorine atom (chlorine being in group 17 or 7A, and a Halogen) becomes a chlorine (Cl-) anion. They both achieve the same electron configurations, with 17 + 19 or 32 electrons in total. Disolving in water does not separate them.

    The electron configuration is (in energylevel sublevel numberofelectrons):
    1s2 2s2 2px2 2py2 2pz2 3s2 2px2 3py2 3pz2, which as it happens, is argon (Ar) another inert, Noble Gas.

    Litium does the same thing, but I think it is with Hydrogen to form Lithium Oxide, (Li2O) but I'm not sure, we haven't covered that in class yet.

  42. People are missing the point by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many of you have ridden motorcycles in a cold winter climate? I don't care how many layers you have on, what nifty fibers they contain, etc. If you wear something that doesn't breathe, you end up covered in sweat. If you wear something that does breathe, you freeze at highway speeds. That's why heated electric vests are so popular.

    I've only been riding motorcycles for about 28 years, so I expect there will be some people that weren't born when I started riding that are sure that they know far more than I. You will find their responses following this.

    1. Re:People are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only ridden for the past 21 years, but I have to disagree. For sure, the big deal is wind chill, with a 130 Kph wind zipping past. But some of the newer jackets are pretty good, blocking the wind very well, but allowing moisture transfer. I've never needed extra heating since buying my last one.

    2. Re:People are missing the point by tortap-0 · · Score: 1

      I have never ridden a motorcycle in cold winter climate. But I do ride snowmobiles so I think I know something about cold weather. In the end of January of this year me and my brother went on a 350 kilometer ride starting at -19 C, it was -26 C when we got back. I started with tshirt, a thin turtleneck and a lined cotton shirt and my snowmobilejacket/pants. The snowmobilegear are usually made of Cordura or Gore Tex. I took off the extra shirt after 80 k.

      Sure a snowmobile have a windshield and it's quite active driving, shifting your weigth around all the time. But still, two thin layers and a good breating jacket/pant-combination at -19 to -26 C for 7-8 hours. Sure you will freeze if you come in contact with parts of the suit directly exposed to wind. The 3 mm neoprene kneepads take care of that.

    3. Re:People are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean mild weather, right ? ;) I haven't seen too many people riding their bikes up here in Canada in winter time. Most people pack up their bike around first snow.

      It would take you half an hour to find your bike in that snow bank in the parking lot. It would also be fun to kick start the engine after the tiny battery has been sitting in -25C for a few hours. If you are riding around on the highway, having slurry of salt, snow, grit flying at you would make it very unpleasant. Did I mention about lack of traction - you & the cars around you ?

  43. Needs a Palm Interface by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    For 500 bucks, they should throw a palm interface in there to monitor the body temperature and how much heat is being generated.

    How cool would it be if you can sync up your body stats to a website.

    "Frank's avg temperature for today was: 101F"

  44. Misread... by gnovos · · Score: 2

    I had read it as "Self wearing jackets" and I was about to be really impressed... Oh well, maybe someday!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  45. Expensive? I think not... by TheDragoneater · · Score: 1

    Let's see...Normal Coat: $300. Good winter pants: $100. Bunny Boots: $200. Polarfleece layer between coat/pants/boots: $200. I don't know about anyone else, but I see a SAVINGS here...

  46. Steel Wool and George Jetson by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Reminds me of when I used to burn still wool, like that as a kid. The fine stuff was great for making homemade fireworks.

    Also, reminds me of George Jetson in one episode (when he thought he was going to die) trying out some indestructable suit for Spacely Sprockets to win the Good Spacekeeping Seal. It survived all the tests, but was ruined when Jane put it in the wash. Dry Clean only!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  47. Like this? by Cheshire+Cat · · Score: 2

    Get your warm toilet seat right here.

    --

    Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I'll never know.
  48. Just use it to heat sink your Athlon notebook. by Blaede · · Score: 1

    No need for batteries that way.

  49. more for less, except in as fashion statement by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    dumbass kids.

    Try to be more judgemental, ok?

    ame kind of kids that buy the "Timberland" boots and leave that stupid leather keychain looking tag on, just so they can show off their newest "Tim'"s with all the logos they can.

    This reminded me of reading about electric socks, years ago. You can still find them in sporting goods catalogs. For my money, I take along two pair of socks, one heavy and one light. Wear the heavy ones over the light ones. Quite a bit of this is outdoors common sense.

    Some fashionable jackets are actually functional, but I've noticed the tags and extra designer junk gets to be more and more of a hassle. And for hiking boots, I have Raichle, probably one of the best boots on the market and you can hardly tell, because the only tag is tiny, as opposed to the 4 Swooshes i counted on the last pair of Nike boots I saw at the shoe store. My Salomons lasted about 1 year (made in taiwan of pretty much 100% manmade fibers and junk) My Raichles will probably last 20 years (made in Hungary of natural materials and not batteries required.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  50. you know whatd be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    self cooling jackets

    you can just pile on more and more clothing till you look like the michelin man, but you can only take off so much :)

  51. Cotton bad for cold by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Don't even think about going out in cold weather in cotton, particularly if you plan to do anything which may cause you to break a sweat, since cotton will absorb all the moisture and is a long time drying out. Better to go with Polypropelene or other synthetics of wool if you don't have a reaction. Cotton's not the first choice for shells either as it'll hold water and get heavy.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  52. Ionization of sweat problems, too? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    While the Li-Ion cell taking a hit would certainly be a problem, maybe even starting a fire (is this thing fireproof?) I expect these microfiber wires aren't insulated, themselves. So you get some salts from persperation in there and poof, caustic could be produced. No thanks.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  53. most excellent! by kraada · · Score: 1

    now my Marty McFly: 2015 outfit is nearly complete . . . someone, quick, invent the hoverboard!

  54. Bah by mcwop · · Score: 1

    I ski and have never needed a battery heated jacket. Even when it was negative wind chill. But hey $500 is not bad when you consider a gore-tex shell and windproof fleece, and polypro long under wear will set you back at least $600.

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  55. Why would I need one by tot · · Score: 1

    I prefer living in a climate where I do not need one. Like I do now.

  56. A $500 jacket is cheap. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    Have any of you people ever owned a jacket that doesn't say "Members Only" on it?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:A $500 jacket is cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have any of you people ever owned a jacket that doesn't say "Members Only" on it?


      Hahaha! Only the ones who wear their SCA capes around town.

    2. Re:A $500 jacket is cheap. by inburito · · Score: 1

      heheh.. How about a full outfit from Mover. Looks good, does it's job well and costs a fortune..

  57. But the real question::: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does the jacket taste? If you're lost long enough in the arctic to need this thing, you may get hungry.

    You know, it's like the sleeping bag:

    1. the great things about the sleeping bag is that there's a key to the locked box at the bottom.

    2. The inner-lining of the sleeping bag is edible

    3. There's a map of the surrounding desert including oasis's (where water is to be had) is printed on the inside.

    4. Just kidding: there is no sleeping bag.

    -Paraphrasing from the "Infidel" hint-guide regarding the sleeping bag.

  58. KDENCE? Don't you mean K-Dense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to say something nice, but you spelled "Huah!" wrong, and then I noticed that "Semper Fi" thing...

    Tell me one thing, would you? If they could get marines to say "Semper Fi", which is all the way up to three syllables, why couldn't they teach you all the other two?

    :-)

    When it absolutely, positively /has/ to be destroyed, overnight!
    ~Rejected recruiting motto to replace "Be All You Can Be..."

  59. Power It With A Fuel Cell by ty_kramer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Batteries don't do well in cold weather. More importantly, the colder it gets (and the more you want your jacket to be warm), the worse the jacket's battery will perform.

    Some form of fuel cell would be just the ticket:

    Laptop Methanol Fuel Cells Promised This Week

    It should be easy to convince the propane-toting crowd that a fuel cell is a sensible way to supply heat to a jacket.

    And you'd never again have to face that sinking feeling, high on an alpine ridge, that what you thought was a jacket battery was actually the battery you used to complete that chunk of code during the flight out...

    1. Re:Power It With A Fuel Cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The colder it gets, the less capacity a battery has - not just performance.

      Why would you use a fuel cell to drive an electric heater when you can simplly burnt the fuel and circulate the warm exhaust around in the jacket using some kind of micro air duct ? A small turbine can generate some electricity to drive the air circulation system. Trap moisture can then be vented out of the body keeping it warm & dry.

  60. Infrared Decoy! by kninja · · Score: 1

    I could just see this jacket being taken off and then used as a decoy for a heatcam. That could help a soldier out of a pinch, although ditching your jacket is probably a big no-no, especially if it's cold out.

  61. I doubt that the USMC, by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    which gets a lot of its stuff from REI, is paying much attention to this. Mostly they're discarding what doesn't work, and continuing to go after the bad guys.

    God bless Western Civilization (minus the French, Germans, Spanish, Italians, and other former fascists).

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  62. Second law of thermodynamics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering: if you used one of the new human powered generators (squeeze or stomp-activated) to supply the power for the coat, would this keep you warmer (inefficient conversion) or colder than if you were to just do the equivalent exercises (work), without channeling the energy into the coat?

  63. Mandatory movie reference by felipeal · · Score: 2



    Marty McFly's jacket

  64. A jacket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why an outer layer? Wouldn't you just lose that heat more rapidly than if it were under other layers? Would this be more effective as long underwear? Would it need to be set at such a high temperature if the heat didn't have to go through any layers to reach your body? How much longer would the battery last if you didn't have to set the temperature so high?

  65. Re:military battery safety [OT] by Peter+McC · · Score: 1

    You're precisely right. Anti-personnel land mines are often designed to (seriously) injure, not kill. Not so much for economic damage, but as a tactical matter - if your buddy gets wounded by a mine, you're going to go help him and not keep up the pursuit, whereas if your buddy gets killed by a mine, you're going to keep pursuing. Plus smaller mines are cheaper.

    Just another reason why they're so evil....

    --
    You know what I hate? Wait, what do you like? I hate that!
  66. Re:KDENCE? Don't you mean K-Dense? by KDENCE · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an army limpie trying to make a statement, or maybe a navy squid? Question? What did you do in service? ncoic of some supply closet? question 2? how does it feel having have cheated yourself out of serving your country right with the Marines? Well anyways, those are a couple to ponder on. Kids remember, if you want to serve your country the way you are supposed to, join the Marines! Semper Fi and good night!

  67. Overclock it? by Zapdos · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I boost the voltage a bit, and cover my body with high quality thermal grease....

  68. infra red detection bonus : ) by spasm · · Score: 1

    "hey sarge, my infra red detector is barely working!"

    "don't worry kid, the yanks are using those stupid self-heating jackets - stand out like a sore thumb no matter how clapped out our gear is.."

  69. Old news!! by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 0

    Wow! I'm pretty shocked at this post. Its really really old news. Its been around for about 6-9 months. I even have the Mountain Equipment Co-op catalogue from like 4 months ago with it in it.

    whats up with that?

    --
    -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
  70. Electrically heated gloves, socks, etc. by Animats · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Electrically heated garments date back to 1913 and the early open-cockpit aircraft days. Electrically heated gloves and socks are common. But battery capacity has been a problem. Lithium-ion batteries give about a 2x power density improvement, so that's a step forward. But this is hardly a new idea.

  71. I Live in alaska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring it on!

  72. Offtopic: Holy crap. by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    User Info for Christopher Bibbs (14)

    http://www.mdlug.org/

    Christopher Bibbs has posted 130 comments. Below find the most recent 24 comments.

    Only 130? man that's very low for someone with one of the first IDs, maybe he's an editior?

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  73. would you get shocked when it rains? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    maybe this is a dumb question, but i just had to ask

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  74. A better one - Inflatable coat by WetCat · · Score: 1

    Recently I heard of a better (and obvious) idea - a coat with inflatable pockets inside it that you can inflate by mouth if you need additional heat protection. It's actually better than electrical heat.

  75. This isn't that new... by caferace · · Score: 1
    Motorcyclists have been using electrically heated gear for years. The first time I heard of an electric vest (powered off the bikes battery) was 25 years ago. Since then, electric (as well as chemical reaction) heated gloves have been added to the mix as well.

    As far as I know, no rider has burst into flames yet. ;)

    In 1979, I skied with some chemical reaction pouches tucked inside my gloves at Whistler, B.C. in some seriously cold weather. It was a joy, but back then the thermal regulation sucked. At times they would get a bit too hot. I did try electric ski socks once, but having the battery strapped to the sock was uncomfortable. I think that was in '80 or so.

    There is no reason why this tech hasn't come far enough now to make it totally practical, reliable and safe.

  76. Self warming underwear would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a coats nice but frostbitten balls hurt, so work on that.

    1. Re:Self warming underwear would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or socks, my wifes feet are freakin ice.....

  77. Sure by inerte · · Score: 1

    Give me heat so I can sleep more. Sadly, frozen persons got to do something to keep it cool.

    At 500 bucks, last thing I will do it is buy it.

    Fireplace? Yeah, woods, matches, history. Develop your own individual society folks, that's not what we need.

    Okay?

  78. Motorcyclists have used these for years... by antirename · · Score: 1

    This one just uses a battery instead of a bike's 12V electrical system. I think a heater plug is an option on some BMW motorcycles now... I had to solder in a connector for my jacket on my Ninja, but it works fine. I wonder how long that lithium ion battery really lasts, though?

  79. Body powered by jyda · · Score: 1

    Why not get rid of those batteries and make it into a body powered device?

    --
    "Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
  80. motorcycles! by jimdesu · · Score: 1

    For those of us who ride motorcycles in wet and cold weather, these things'd be great. When it's raining and 40 degrees out and I've got a synthetic 90mph head-wind, I get to work frozen to the bone and can't warm up for hours(even w/ coffee). I want one!

    --
    --- The reclining dragon deeply fears the blue pool's clarity.
  81. Old-hat - try carbon fibre weaves by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    The problem with something made of wire is that the wires eventually break and a lot earlier than the rest of the jacket.

    I have seen a jacket made from a carbon fibre cloth. It conducts and the current path is such that you can make holes in the thing (i.e, for arms) without problems. The only critical pints on thw whole structure is where the wire joins it.

    The heater can be used for other things as well such as engines or pipes. I forget the company making it, but I believe they are Russian. The jecket are cheap enough to give to a night watchman.

    1. Re:Old-hat - try carbon fibre weaves by hughk · · Score: 2
      This would be nice, a ski jacket is usually more than just for posing in. The bumps that tend to happen would rather take it out on wires.

      The wired jacket would be good for spectators though - but maybe a little expensive.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  82. Xtreme jacket for Xtreme Sports by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    $500 may seem steep to some, but my paragliding and hang gliding friends will all buy them when they are more readily available. In fact gloves, pants and socks would be great too.

    I fly a paraglider, and launch off a mountain at 2000 feet, and am able to ride rising hot air current (called thermals) to well over 7000 feet. There's a lot of variation in climate and temperature when flying, and it gets _very_ cold when you're up at the base of the clouds. Many times I've landed because I was too cold.

    Batteries wouldn't be such a big deal since I could carry a larger cell on my harness and just plug in.

  83. Far North? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I'm in our far North (Townsville Australia) and up here you know it's winter cos you have to turn the fan off. The only thing we use insulation for is to keep the beer cool.

  84. price by xtype · · Score: 1

    The jackets, sadly, come with a nasty price -- US$500

    What is wrong with the price?
    My favorite winter coat cost almost twice that.

    It is hard to find a good warm coat that is not huge/puffy, and that does not restrict movement.
    -

    Hmmm... and I am sure that anyone who has purchased a real leather jacket has spent about that price. and I am sure their leather jacket wont be as warm as this thing.

  85. Alternative solution by jeti · · Score: 2

    My cousin actually owns a neoprene jacket with
    microcapsules of wax. The wax melts at room
    temperature and can store quite a bit of energy.
    When it's cold outside, the wax slowly releases
    the heat to the body.

    I'm not sure whether this jacket is on the market.
    He was jobbing for a sports fashion producer when
    he got it (Adidas?).

  86. Flaming Jacket by mightyflash · · Score: 1

    Cheers!

  87. ski lift plug in power! by panZ · · Score: 1

    I could see this being VERY usefull for skiing. I've been skiing in zero degree weather and layered so much that I couldn't help but get really hot while skiing aggressively but then find myself bundling up as much as possible and still being a bit chilly on the windy lift ride up the face of a mountain. I wasn't terribly uncomfortable but if I had a lighter amount of clothes on for skiing and could just power up my jacket or even better plug my jacket in to a socket on the chair lift, that would definitely kick ass.

    --
    --Let's hack root on 127.0.0.1 --panZ
  88. I hope this is very successful for Malden Mills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of you likely do not know that Malden Mills suffered a fire a few years back and as a result, was closed until the damage was repaired. In the meantime, the many people that worked there were facing not getting paid, until the factory was operational. Aaron Feuerstein (owner of MM) continued to pay everyone out of his pocket until the factory reopened, which was a considerable sum of money. I hope this is a great success.

    Here's to Mr. Feuerstein and his generosity and loyalty to his workers. Talk about Karma...

  89. Fahrenheit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    114 degrees fahrenheit?
    wouldn't the military require standardized units of temperature?
    consider what would happen when some designer or tester misunderstands this and interprets it as celcius! (or kelvin)

  90. Re:military battery safety [OT] by saridder · · Score: 1

    According to military tactics (I'm a vet), on an assault, you can't stop and help a buddy until the action is over. Then if he's alive, you can administer 1st aid, and call in medivac,. etc. You have to keep going, even if he begs for help.

    --
    --- RFC 1149 Compliant.
  91. Additional design flaw... by Pollux · · Score: 2

    Anyone ever think about what happens when the battery goes out?

    Being as how steel is woven into the fabric, and being as how steel is a very good conductor of heat, it also means that it's a very good heat-disipator as well. When the battery goes out, not only will the heat be lost quick, but your body heat will also be lost quicker through the fabric of the coat.

    Something like this would work nice as a vest or an inside liner, but I wouldn't want to have it inside the coat itself.

    Words of wisdom from a northerner who loves the cold (and hasn't been getting enough of it this winter).

  92. Electric Heated Socks by Catmeat · · Score: 1
    I saw these advertised in Sky and Telescopt in the mid 80's. It's a good idea. Spending all night behind a telescopy must get pretty chilly if you're checking out the winter constellations. Similarily, heated motorcycle clothing that plugs into the bike's electrics has also been around for years (AFIK, World War One pilots where the first to try this out).

    The real showstopper with general use clothing is the need for a battery to replace power from a bike or airplane. As battery technology has not radically surged forward in the last year or two, this jacket sounds a complete gimmick.

  93. You don't need electric jackets - Hein Gericke by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You don't need electric heating to be warm on a bike. Just get a decent quality bike jacket that was made this decade.

    Hein Gericke do some reasonable ones at reasonable prices. They breathe, do keep you warm at 90 on the motorway in winter, and are completely waterproof. I use one and ride daily in the UK, renowned for it's warm sunny weather, in all seasons.

    Heated jackets are popular because the rest of you are all PFFs.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:You don't need electric jackets - Hein Gericke by fmaxwell · · Score: 1, Troll

      You don't need electric heating to be warm on a bike. Just get a decent quality bike jacket that was made this decade.

      I have a decent motorcycle riding suit and probably go out at temperatures that would freeze your eurobutt. I can dress for riding down the highway or I can dress for around-town. But if you mix the two, you are either too hot or too cold.

      Besides, I don't like having to deal with a full riding suit when I just want to take a run to the store, go to a restaurant, etc.

      By the way, when you say "90 on the motorway", do you mean 90kph or 90mph? If it's kph, I have a scooter that's almost that fast and if I rode 90kph (56mph) on the highways around here, I'd be squashed within a week.

    2. Re:You don't need electric jackets - Hein Gericke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who is the idiot the moderated the above post to "troll"?

      P.S. Now I'm down to 49 Karma Points! Oh no! What will I do?

  94. Heated gloves, I might go for though. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    I don't like heated grips on bikes. Bike electrics are dodgy at the best of times without throwing heated grips into the mix.

    Again, HG do some fantastic non electric 3 finger gloves that are waterproof and warm in all but the coldest freezing fog.

    I don't work for Hein Gericke BTW, just use some of their products.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Heated gloves, I might go for though. by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Maybe you need to buy a better bike, one without crap electrics (I know, you really fly the Union Jack, and won't have a bike that doesn't have 'Lucas' proudly embossed on every electric component:)

      I've got heated grips, heated seat (came with bike, not by choice) and wife wears a heated vest. And we also have decent riding gear otherwise. But some people have different abilities to generate heat and cope with the loss of it. So some people need active heating.

      Here's a joke older than I:

      Why do the British like warm beer?
      Lucas also makes refrigerators.

      Keep the shiny side up.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  95. These have existed for years! by pkx · · Score: 1

    Us motorcyclists have been using electric heated vests/chaps/gloves for years. Check out www.widder.com.

  96. Get a decent bike jacket by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    I ride all year round in the UK and these days bike jackets are *completely* waterproof, warm at 90mph on the Motorway in freezing weather and breathable.

    The Hein Gericke Voyager II jacket is a good example, though, like all sequels, not as good as the original Voyager I.

    Gloves are a bigger issue. HG Pathan three finger gloves are fantastic for all but below zero temperatures, but I might be persuaded to use electric gloves if they were simple to use.

    --
    Deleted
  97. Price by acoustix · · Score: 2

    $500 isn't that expensive considering when you walk into a store and see the same price on an unheated Tommy H. coat. I've seen many coats over a $1,000.

    $500 seems like a reasonable price for a new product like that and I'm sure price will come down after a while.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  98. Motorcyclists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This jacket sounds like it would be perfect for motorcyclists, many of whom already depend on electrically heated gloves and vests from companies like Widder.

  99. Drying mode ON! (Back to the Future) by JDembner · · Score: 1

    Finally that jacket from Back to the Future 2 will be available! Now if only they could make the high top Nike's with automatic velcro straps.

  100. Moose hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine used to be a missionary near Resolute Bay (way far north). The Inuit up there already know how to keep really warm: moose hide.

    I can't remember where I read it, but someone once did a study comparing moose hide jackets to microfiber/artificial material jackets. The moose hide left the wearer the warmest under cold temperatures - apparently had something to do with the structure of the hair and how it overlapped.

    The downside: if you want to keep the hair, you can't tan moose hide - apparently all the hair falls off. So, when you're not in a cold environment, you literally have to keep your moose hide jacket in the freezer ;)

    Glenn

    1. Re:Moose hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your friend also tell you about the weight of moose hide? Yes, it is VERY warm however, it is also extremely heavy. Also, mosse hide is very tough, it would not make a comfortable jacket. I might consider it for a blanket (I have one) but not for jackets....

  101. This isn't new - check your motorbike gear catalog by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    For us who ride motorbikes, this concept isn't new by any means. Especially for us who ride all year round, like me.

    A good jacket will cost you $500 and up anyway. A good jacket which keeps you warm, dry, and safe at highway speeds and considerably more will often set you back somewhere between $700 and $900.

    Gloves, jackets and even underwear with built-in heating have existed for some time. Most of them plug into the bike's generator.

  102. Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Down the road, fibers could relay not only heat but also data..."

    Imagine a beow... ah, nevermind.

  103. Good for hunting by lamj · · Score: 1

    I can't wait till they make it into a hunting jacket with a shell made of material like MT050.

    Sometimes when doing late season still hunt for whitetails or moose, tempature can drop to -15 Celcius and with windchill maybe -25C and due to the fact that I am sitting still for 3-4 hours+, my body just do not generate enough heat to warm myself even with the MT050 extreme jackets from Cabelas. It is those occasion where this jacket would come into play. I would buy it even if it is more expensive (which is very likely if they convert it into hunting version)

  104. $500 is cheap if you really need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ride a motorcycle and it's almost impossible to find a jacket with proper armor and construction for under $400. And that still leaves you without pants. $500 for a good heated jacket doesn't sound out of line if the weather regularly gets gold enough to require it.

  105. Self-Toasting Bread by serutan · · Score: 2

    Slashdot item for 2012:

    This article over on FoodDot reports that researchers at Nutriglomerate have invented bread that toasts itself. A network of conductive thermal protein monofibers woven through the bread during baking draws power from an organic battery in the center of each slice. When the toast is done the battery's own heat converts it to a pat of butter. Bon apetit!

  106. And in Celsius that would be... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    45 degrees...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  107. New slashdot category by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    I don't know if this exists, but with the focus of news going to wepons and military hardware [nerdware]... let's use a Military category.

    I would like to list news that is related to Military improvments, but so would the Bad Guys [tm]

  108. Land's End Blanket based on this stuff is recalled by Ewann · · Score: 1

    Oops. The first commercial implementation of this technology (in a very big selling electric blanket from Land's End) is being recalled. From Land's End's website:

    CPSC, Lands' End, Inc. Announce Recall of Electric Blankets

    PRODUCT: Electric Blanket -- Lands' End, Inc. of Dodgeville, Wis., is voluntarily recalling about 15,000 Polartec Heat® electric blankets. The recalled blankets are style numbers 73176, 73197 and 73198.

  109. I think this is a good idea, because by soy(storm) · · Score: 0

    I live (strangely enough by my own choice) in Grand Forks, North f@#$ing Dakota.

    This thing would help me get to class in the morning.

    --

    Currere potes, sed oculare non potes.

  110. The other half of the story by gelfling · · Score: 2

    This is a company that's been in the news because the main plant burned to the ground several years ago and the owner, a family owner 2nd or 3rd generation refused to take anyone off the payroll even though the company nearly went bankrupt recently until it secured new capital. This new project will probably save the company which proves that sometimes good deeds are rewarded.

  111. unfortunately, the patient died by Gospodin · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    The company even dropped one climber in a 20-foot crevasse and buried him in snow until he started shaking, then had him flip on the jacket.

    "Soon afterwards he stopped shaking, and we realized this was a pretty cool project," said Thomas Laakso, advanced project manager at The North Face, the San Leandro, California-based unit of VF Corp.

    Does anyone else see something ominous here?

    --
    ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
  112. Hypothermia treatment isn't external heat ! by NKJensen · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about mild hypothermia.

    But I can tell you that you may kill a severely cold person (bad hypothermia) if you try to "re-heat" him from the outside.

    It will release very cold blod from the outer skin and this may cause the heart to stop.
    A severely hypothermic person should be gain normal temperature from the inside mainly generated by himself.

    This can be done by placing them in dry isolating blankets, one blanket wrapped around the body and another one around arms, shoulders and head. If they are still concious, they may be given small amounts of hot non-alcoholic drink.

    --
    -- From Denmark