It is not because his brain is damaged but because his brain is washed. And the US government will continue to make sure people's brains are washed through skillful PR and marketing trickery.
1. the "security issues" are mostly relating to the auditability of Huawei's 3rd party components (which Huawei would not have access to the source codes; well otherwise the US would use that as an attack point instead.) It is like saying that I don't know how to disassemble my car's engine for inspection, therefore my car is about lose control and hit a wall. 2. and this HCSEC, set up by the UK spy agency in 2010, haven't had any complains for 8 years and are now suddenly raising the flags during the Sino-US trade war. This is just a made-up accusations by a puppet of the USA. 3. all of these cooperation with Chinese government for spying is just speculation. But given Huawei is a major hi-tech symbol of China, under millions of watchful eyes around the world, why would the government ask them to compromising.
In the other news, Iraq has large amount of WMDs...
While people in the West value more, or brainwashed to value more, about freedom of speech. Chinese people value the freedom of everyday activities more. That's why China does not have millions of lines of legalese fine-prints like in the US.
Face tracking is not the biggest threat. The biggest erosion of personal freedom in China is this one: WeChat Pay.
Why? Before the advent of WeChat and Alipay, China was mostly a cash based society, so the government had little knowledge of your payment transactions. Which is why China has to rely on state-owned enterprises for revenues, since there were no effective way to collect taxes from ordinary people and 95% of Chinese do not file a tax report.
Now, that's all changed: everything is paid via WeChat and Alipay, even pant handlers. So every transaction can be tracked, and taxed.
Of course, in the U.S., people have been on checks and credit cards for who knows how many decades. China is catching up fast on that front.
1. patent infringements are not the same as IP theft by definition; 2. patent infringements happen all the time in the US, check the East Texas court filings. 3. and patents are also enforced in China. in fact, it is known that foreign patent holders get favorable ruling over there. 4. at the same time, patent trollings also happen all the time in the US, also check the East Texas court filings. 5. The US also commit IP theft even nowaday, in addition to its historic dirt.
U.S. President Donald Trump has accused China of stealing American innovations and technology and has slapped trade tariffs on $234 billion of Chinese goods to punish Beijing.
Nowaday, patent portfolio is your war chest. If you don't have a lot of patents, you are at risk of being sued out of existence by US patent trolls. Given the US wants to fight this "intellectual property" war, i.e. patent trolling, it is only natural for Chinese companies to stock up their weapons.
In the American way, if they want to attack you, they will dig out clauses from million lines of codes that you may or may not susceptible of violating due to some fine-print deviation and then throw frivolous lawsuits after lawsuits at you while you tarnish in the legal proceedings. Americans are best at lawyering.
And how can one file criminal charge when the claim cannot pass a civil suit?
"According to the jury’s verdict, T-Mobile was not awarded any damages relating to the trade secrets claim and there was no award of punitive damages. Although the jury awarded damages under the breach of contract allegation, the amount was a small fraction of what T-Mobile requested. Huawei is a global leader in innovation, and respect for intellectual property is a cornerstone value in our business,” Huawei said in a statement after the verdict in 2017.
... like they will send all Angela Merkel's nude images to the NSA [theguardian.com], trigger all WMDs in Iraq, and make you hyper paranoia if you are not already.
Before the case reaches the court, the Canadian DOJ can decide whether to proceed with the case first. The Canada government should therefore stand against US political persecution.
“One, political involvement by comments from [US President] Donald Trump in her case. Two, there’s an extraterritorial aspect to her case, and three, there’s the issue of Iran sanctions which are involved in her case, and Canada does not sign on to these Iran sanctions. So I think she has some strong arguments that she can make before a judge,” McCallum said.
Sounds like/. is also afraid of publishing stories inconvenient to the American public.
You can criticize "whataboutism" if "whatabout'ed" fault is not committed by yourself (or your own country in this context.) However, if yourself commits the same fault that you use to criticize your opponent, or even worse launching a war on the same accusation, that shows your immoral characteristic -- it's outright evil.
Western officials say systems of checks and balances in their countries allow for companies to challenge those demands, unlike in China.
and
U.S. intelligence officials have suggested at times that their views on Huawei are informed by definitive examples of malfeasance, though they have so far refused to share such evidence publicly.
In the other news, they will also refuse to share real evidence of Iraq WMDs with the public.
According to the jury’s verdict, T-Mobile was not awarded any damages relating to the trade secrets claim and there was no award of punitive damages. Although the jury awarded damages under the breach of contract allegation, the amount was a small fraction of what T-Mobile requested.
Of course, in the current trade war, the US will abuse the law and find every possible way to launch PR actions against major Chinese companies.
Canada has a treaty with the USA that Canada is honouring
More likely that Canada is a puppet of USA and was threaten during its own trade negotiation to obey orders from the US intelligent and military agencies to launch joint attacks against China.
Canada always has the option to evade such order skillfully otherwise. For example, when the US demanded Hong Kong to hand over Edward Snowden, Hong Kong authority skillfully bounced the request for more "clarification" and let Snowden, whom was formally charged (whereas Meng hasn't been yet,) fret over to Russia.
Fabricating false accusation against an VIP based on sanction not allowed by UN during negotiation and request your puppet to hijacked her as a hostage, as admitted by the President, is also an act of war.
This particular drug dealer, though, shouldn't be sentenced only to 15 years in the first place -- smuggling 50 grams of drug qualifies for death penalty in China. And all lower courts can make mistakes, including in US and in China; that's why they have appeal process. Of course, adversaries like hot-head Americans or political liars can say whatever they want but that's just their opinions as well.
However, given the US and its Five Eye puppets have started the war first, then any response from China wouldn't be irrational.
Slashdot Mirror
The US is accusing China of state-sponsored hi-tech push, while the US pirates their policy. Another example of American hypocrisy.
It is not because his brain is damaged but because his brain is washed. And the US government will continue to make sure people's brains are washed through skillful PR and marketing trickery.
Exactly.
Besides:
1. the "security issues" are mostly relating to the auditability of Huawei's 3rd party components (which Huawei would not have access to the source codes; well otherwise the US would use that as an attack point instead.) It is like saying that I don't know how to disassemble my car's engine for inspection, therefore my car is about lose control and hit a wall.
2. and this HCSEC, set up by the UK spy agency in 2010, haven't had any complains for 8 years and are now suddenly raising the flags during the Sino-US trade war. This is just a made-up accusations by a puppet of the USA.
3. all of these cooperation with Chinese government for spying is just speculation. But given Huawei is a major hi-tech symbol of China, under millions of watchful eyes around the world, why would the government ask them to compromising.
In the other news, Iraq has large amount of WMDs...
It is about the US being paranoia and hypocritical, as well as FUDing the American people like they did before the Iraq War.
While people in the West value more, or brainwashed to value more, about freedom of speech. Chinese people value the freedom of everyday activities more. That's why China does not have millions of lines of legalese fine-prints like in the US.
Face tracking is not the biggest threat. The biggest erosion of personal freedom in China is this one: WeChat Pay.
Why? Before the advent of WeChat and Alipay, China was mostly a cash based society, so the government had little knowledge of your payment transactions. Which is why China has to rely on state-owned enterprises for revenues, since there were no effective way to collect taxes from ordinary people and 95% of Chinese do not file a tax report.
Now, that's all changed: everything is paid via WeChat and Alipay, even pant handlers. So every transaction can be tracked, and taxed.
Of course, in the U.S., people have been on checks and credit cards for who knows how many decades. China is catching up fast on that front.
The US also has gitmo that locks up without trial people the government does not like.
Whataboutism? Ho ho ho. This article is about AI race and it is used promptly to attack Chinese using IP issue. What about that?
And then what about hypocrisy? what about double standard?
1. patent infringements are not the same as IP theft by definition;
2. patent infringements happen all the time in the US, check the East Texas court filings.
3. and patents are also enforced in China. in fact, it is known that foreign patent holders get favorable ruling over there.
4. at the same time, patent trollings also happen all the time in the US, also check the East Texas court filings.
5. The US also commit IP theft even nowaday, in addition to its historic dirt.
U.S. President Donald Trump has accused China of stealing American innovations and technology and has slapped trade tariffs on $234 billion of Chinese goods to punish Beijing.
So how is this story really related to the Chinese IP theft accusation? Perhaps, we should also be reminded of American's own dirty history and current activities?
Does anyone really think that because IBM/Microsoft/... has patented something that that will stop anyone in _China_ from using/infringing it?
It will get China to stock up their weapons to fight off American patent trolls.
Nowaday, patent portfolio is your war chest. If you don't have a lot of patents, you are at risk of being sued out of existence by US patent trolls. Given the US wants to fight this "intellectual property" war, i.e. patent trolling, it is only natural for Chinese companies to stock up their weapons.
Correction: million lines of legal codes
In the American way, if they want to attack you, they will dig out clauses from million lines of codes that you may or may not susceptible of violating due to some fine-print deviation and then throw frivolous lawsuits after lawsuits at you while you tarnish in the legal proceedings. Americans are best at lawyering.
And how can one file criminal charge when the claim cannot pass a civil suit?
"According to the jury’s verdict, T-Mobile was not awarded any damages relating to the trade secrets claim and there was no award of punitive damages. Although the jury awarded damages under the breach of contract allegation, the amount was a small fraction of what T-Mobile requested. Huawei is a global leader in innovation, and respect for intellectual property is a cornerstone value in our business,” Huawei said in a statement after the verdict in 2017.
... like they will send all Angela Merkel's nude images to the NSA [theguardian.com], trigger all WMDs in Iraq, and make you hyper paranoia if you are not already.
The US is already in the state of paranoia.
Before the case reaches the court, the Canadian DOJ can decide whether to proceed with the case first. The Canada government should therefore stand against US political persecution.
That one is.
“One, political involvement by comments from [US President] Donald Trump in her case. Two, there’s an extraterritorial aspect to her case, and three, there’s the issue of Iran sanctions which are involved in her case, and Canada does not sign on to these Iran sanctions. So I think she has some strong arguments that she can make before a judge,” McCallum said.
Sounds like /. is also afraid of publishing stories inconvenient to the American public.
And this ambassador had to retract his words after facing political pressure from Canada’s main opposition party leader for McCallum’s removal. Great for freedom of speech!
You can criticize "whataboutism" if "whatabout'ed" fault is not committed by yourself (or your own country in this context.) However, if yourself commits the same fault that you use to criticize your opponent, or even worse launching a war on the same accusation, that shows your immoral characteristic -- it's outright evil.
The logical implication of your comment is that you believe the Chinese government has never requested such data from these companies.
That indeed hasn't been proven.
In the same TFA,
Western officials say systems of checks and balances in their countries allow for companies to challenge those demands, unlike in China.
and
U.S. intelligence officials have suggested at times that their views on Huawei are informed by definitive examples of malfeasance, though they have so far refused to share such evidence publicly.
In the other news, they will also refuse to share real evidence of Iraq WMDs with the public.
The Western media should also tell you Iraq has WMDs.... oh, they did so already.
As long as we can continue to accuse China for "jailing" Muslims, the country will claim Moral Superiority and make its populace feeling Exceptional.
Neither they filed criminal suit against Steve Job (who misappropriated secret from Xerox)
As for this Huawei-T-Mobile case, how could one steal secret if he has signed the NDA and obtained the rights to that secret, as long as the secret is never reviewed to 3rd party. In fact, that verdict was not about trade secret theft at all and only about contractual obligation:
According to the jury’s verdict, T-Mobile was not awarded any damages relating to the trade secrets claim and there was no award of punitive damages. Although the jury awarded damages under the breach of contract allegation, the amount was a small fraction of what T-Mobile requested.
Of course, in the current trade war, the US will abuse the law and find every possible way to launch PR actions against major Chinese companies.
Canada has a treaty with the USA that Canada is honouring
More likely that Canada is a puppet of USA and was threaten during its own trade negotiation to obey orders from the US intelligent and military agencies to launch joint attacks against China.
Canada always has the option to evade such order skillfully otherwise. For example, when the US demanded Hong Kong to hand over Edward Snowden, Hong Kong authority skillfully bounced the request for more "clarification" and let Snowden, whom was formally charged (whereas Meng hasn't been yet,) fret over to Russia.
Fabricating false accusation against an VIP based on sanction not allowed by UN during negotiation and request your puppet to hijacked her as a hostage, as admitted by the President, is also an act of war.
This particular drug dealer, though, shouldn't be sentenced only to 15 years in the first place -- smuggling 50 grams of drug qualifies for death penalty in China. And all lower courts can make mistakes, including in US and in China; that's why they have appeal process. Of course, adversaries like hot-head Americans or political liars can say whatever they want but that's just their opinions as well.
However, given the US and its Five Eye puppets have started the war first, then any response from China wouldn't be irrational.