Slashdot Mirror


User: LuNa7ic

LuNa7ic's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
108
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 108

  1. Re:We got some flyin' to do on Air Force Mistakenly Transports Live Nukes Across America · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So flying over other countries with nukes on board is okay, but its not back home?

  2. Re:Great Idea on First Armed Robots on Patrol in Iraq · · Score: 2, Funny

    HAL: I don't like it. It's no fun going out on patrol and being ordered into an area to see if you draw any enemy fire. The human can be replaced.

  3. Heh... on Fox News' FTP Password Anyone? · · Score: 1

    Anyone for a Fox news wiki?

  4. Re:American only belief? on Roswell UFO Festival · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Or do all countries have conspiracies, but the US is better at finding them? Who knows.) Or worse at hiding them...
  5. Re:Half squid, half octopus on Half-Squid, Half-Octopus Discovered Off of Hawaii · · Score: 2, Funny

    *blah blah* Octosquid Overlords *blah blah*

  6. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? on Thousands of Rubber Ducks to Finally End Journey · · Score: 1

    More seriously, maybe scientists should be getting more brightly coloured floating objects and chucking them in the sea at various points. What about red for Russia (two types, one for each coast), yellow for (no I won't go there...) and various other colours for other countries.
    White for France...
  7. Re:Human element is the greatest danger on Fresh Security Breaches At Los Alamos · · Score: 1

    For those who don't know, Los Alamos is a nuclear weapons laboratory in New Mexico.

  8. Re:Both right? on The Impossibility of Colonizing the Galaxy · · Score: 1

    If the big fuss about global warming has any substance to it, we only have ~200 years to get off this rock before we are all screwed.

  9. Re:D'oh on A Look Beneath the 'Surface' · · Score: 1

    Kudos to the first person to moon one of these!

  10. What? on The Real Impact of the Estonian Cyberattack · · Score: 1

    For a moment there I thought the page title said 'The real impact of the Elbonian Cyberattack'. Glad thats cleared up!

  11. Sir! on Soldiers Can't Blog Without Approval · · Score: 1

    Sir! Request permission to blog, Sir!

  12. Errr... on DARPA Developing Defensive Plasma Shield · · Score: 1

    And how exactly does this class as a shield?

  13. Hmmm.... on Exploding Robots May Scout Hazardous Asteroids · · Score: 1

    Are they being built by Dells laptop division?

  14. Are you sure about that? on Google Working To Make 'iPod/iTunes for Books' · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google hopes to 'do for books what the iPod did for music' Convert them into a obscure format and then riddle them with DRM?
  15. Re:This Makes Sense... on Even The Blind Get Deja Vu · · Score: 1

    But does a blind person see in VR?

  16. I dont think so... on NASA's Rollercoaster For Moon Rocket Escape · · Score: 1

    Looking at those pictures - I'll take my chances with the rocket thank you very much.

  17. Re:They should get together with the Debian leader on Jimmy Wales Resigns Chair at Wikipedia · · Score: 3, Funny
    and work on a standardization of bureaucratic nerdiness. Losers.
    This coming from someone with 5481 comments on slashdot?
  18. Ooh! on Wired's Very Short Stories · · Score: 1

    Big red button: must press. Oops!

  19. Re:I'm no expert, but... on A New Spin on Open Source Business Models · · Score: 1

    Quite easily: Step 1: Flip through an economic dictionary to find 10-15 words thathave at least ten letters each. Step 2: Write these words into a paragraph that with correct spelling and grammar. This paragraph does not have to be comprehendable. Step 3: Submit paragraph to slashdot. Step 4: Profit!

  20. Re:Solution. on No Ice on the Moon · · Score: 1

    You just posted on slashdot, you don't have a wife!

  21. Re:Just one? on Google Campus to Become Solar-powered · · Score: 1

    To fix it of course. Repeat after me: Google is not evil. Google is your friend.

  22. Re:Molecular Scale Surgery? on Molecules Manipulated with Lasers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For that reason, this will be unlikely to have a large impact on corrective surgery, however this could make genetic manipulation a lot easier on zygote. If base-pairs between DNA strands could be manipulated individually and precisely, controlled genetic mutation could become feasible in the future.

  23. Re:Of course it's FUD... on Microsoft's Masterpiece of FUD? · · Score: 1

    Whats next, DRM on its anti-linux lawsuits?

  24. Impossible! on PC World's 25 Worst Web Sites · · Score: 1

    They missed www.realultimatepower.net/

  25. The Matrix has you... on A New Kind of OS · · Score: 1
    From TFA...
    Here's an example for you: imagine you are sitting there working away on a video project. After stopping for a break, your OS pops up with a small alert box asking you if you'd like the PC to roll into adaptive mode. You select yes and the OS begins to learn, as you work, what your needs are. You go to open your video project again after lunch and almost immediately, you find that the program feels more in tune and responsive to your needs. On the second monitor, you discover a virtual palette of all the editing tools you use the most. No longer are you being forced to locate the editing tools you need from some arcane menu. No, instead your PC has done the work for you with no interaction on your part whatsoever. Sounds interesting? Just wait, it gets weirder...
    Am I the only one who objects to technology following this path? Unfortunately, I have to use MS Office on a semi-regular basis and I absolutely hate the so-called 'user friendly adaptive technology' included in it, and the the way it automatically capitalises words, 'corrects' spelling, and misaligns objects.

    Why? Because I want to do my OWN thing. I want to customise and fine tune my work to the way I want it. I don't want to have to conform to the standards that are most commonly observed in customer feedback reports. So what if I'm using the the software in a way not forseen by Billy Gates, Steve Ballmer and an army of overpaid consumer research suits.

    I also have some questions:
    *At what point does the PC take over and do everything for you?
    *When does the user become obsolete?
    *Where should the line drawn where we force people to learn about the computer instead of vice versa?
    *When do the MIBs take me away and neuralise me for stumbling upon their secret plot?