Slashdot Mirror


Roswell UFO Festival

jmcharry writes "From the Washington Post: 'Attention, all aliens. Come on down. Because, seriously, this is your crowd. About 50,000 of your closest admirers are expected this weekend for the Roswell UFO Festival, celebrating the 60th anniversary of the nearby crash landing of a flying saucer — and, naturally, the ensuing government cover-up.'"

133 comments

  1. My transporter is in the shop by ptbob · · Score: 0

    Sorry I will not be able to attend the Festival this year. I'll miss seeing all the other lifeforms again, maybe next time.

    1. Re:My transporter is in the shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      You managed to not post here for over 3 years... so, how was jail?

    2. Re:My transporter is in the shop by ptbob · · Score: 0

      You can't mean me? I've posted several times this year. And my transporter(Ford F250) IS in the shop.

    3. Re:My transporter is in the shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feds are coming back, and they won't be so happy to see you this time.

  2. Army Lt. Walter Haut by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "The army's explanation of weather balloons in the Roswell, New Mexico incident 60 years ago has been dealt a serious public relations blow. Late Army Lt. Walter Haut had signed a sealed affidavit prior to his death last year asserting that he had witnessed the wreckage of an egg-shaped craft and its extraterrestrial crew while working at the Roswell Army Air Field. An article at News.com.au reviews how Haut had worked as public relations officer for the Roswell base and was involved in the original weather balloon explanation of events at the time. This recent evidence would seem to confirm speculation that egg-shaped saucers are notoriously difficult to fly safely at low altitude."

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21994224-2,00 .html

    I just post it...

    1. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by tb3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here ya go, the real story. Project Mogul was an Air Force project to detect nuclear tests by listening for them in the high atmosphere. It had the highest security classification, and when one of the balloons, along with it's plastic and tinfoil acoustic detectors, crashed near Roswell, the CIA decided that the UFO story provided a good cover.

      So, technically, it wasn't a weather balloon. Oh and the egg-shaped saucer? That was a different test version of the acoustic detector. They experimented with a number of different shapes.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, it's a shame that Roswell gets all the attention because it turns out there is a logical explanation for what happened. In thousands of other UFO sightings, no such explanation is available. The most compelling one to me is the black triangle incident with the Belgian Air Force, where the government has come right out and said that they have no terrestrial explanation for what all of their radar installations and two F16s witnessed, and that really leaves very few alternative explanations.

      It's a shame the subject of UFOs is ridiculed instead of taken seriously, and of course that is due in large part to the goofball social community surrounding unexplained phenomena. This Roswell celebration is, sadly, a prime example. If instead we had five million people march on Washington and demand the truth, we might get some real disclosure.

      --
      A-Bomb
    3. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could the truth possibly be? If you could get 5 million to march on Washington, I would hope it would be for much more important things than this.

    4. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Tinfoil acoustic detectors? Do you need the hat to use them or will they run on their own?

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    5. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by Shihar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The idea that the US government is capable of covering up UFOs, 9/11, or offing a JFK is laughable. The US absolutely terrible at keeping secrets that stick even a toe into controversy. Just Bush's presidency alone is a long series blown secrets. For better or for worse, American officials love to blow the whistle on anything that is sketchy, and the say what you will about the US press, but they love to expose secrets almost as much as they love Paris Hilton.

      Personally, I have very little fear about what the US does in secret. US secrets get blown pretty much non-stop all the time. Not little secrets, but big ones. Wire taping, snagging foreign folks on the soil of allies then torturing (or sending them to be tortured elsewhere), the list is endless and spans pretty much every single US president in the past 50 years. In more then one or two people know about it (which is pretty much required in order to do anything useful), someone is going to go to the press.

      The idea that the US could conceal the existence of aliens, launch 9/11 against itself, kill JFK, kill cold fusion, or any of the other silly conspiracy theories out there is laughable. For better or for worse, the US sucks at covering things up. What people forget is that the secret holders are still people, and that these people can easily pass information to the press. It takes just one human in the loop to decide that things are not right to have the entire secret blow open.

    6. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by rxmd · · Score: 1

      The most compelling one to me is the black triangle incident with the Belgian Air Force, where the government has come right out and said that they have no terrestrial explanation for what all of their radar installations and two F16s witnessed, and that really leaves very few alternative explanations.

      That incident is apparently also quite ambiguously interpreted; for another opinion you might be interested in reading this page (brought to you by dodgy AOL, but it does have references) on the 1990 Belgian UFO incidents, which calls the validity of the BAF report into question and does offer alternative explanations.

      An UFO sighting is primarily just somebody seeing something he is unable to identify. That's fine. The conjecture that it is actually aliens (and the resulting assumptions about worldwide conspiracies, the miraculous efficiency of otherwise quite inefficient governments to keep things covered up, etc.) is where UFO enthusiasts tend to lose me; it's such a violation of Occam's Razor that I have a very hard time taking much of it seriously.
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    7. Re:Army Lt. Walter Haut by CitznFish · · Score: 0

      The problem with the Project Mogul explanation is two fold.

      1) there was no reported missing balloon on or near the day of the Roswell "crash". The project kept detailed records of every balloon, and each balloon had contact info listed on it if it was discovered by a citizen.

      2) The materials used for Project Mogul were not top secret, only the project itself was. Any layman would have easily identified the parts of the balloon and reflectors. Ranchers in Roswell have seen lots of downed weather balloons. This one would be no different aside from having many more reflectors on it. Saying this was a project mogul balloon is laughable at best.

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  3. UFO - Roswell? HAHA by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I guess it's a form of socializing and these people get off on it...

    Btw, Area 51 has been closed for some time due to hazmat risks, the business is now moved to a more desolate place.

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    1. Re:UFO - Roswell? HAHA by lena_10326 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I guess it's a form of socializing and these people get off on it...
      I spose you haven't heard. Earth Girls are Easy.

      http://www.amazon.com/Earth-Girls-Easy-Geena-Davis /dp/B00005QCVN/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-5539242-8032110 ?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1183905454&sr=8-1

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    2. Re:UFO - Roswell? HAHA by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those who do not know what hazmat means... I didn't...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  4. Seriously, aliens, stay away. by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I were an alien, landing in the midst of 50,000 "worshippers" in a town of 45,000 people in SE New Mexico would NOT be my first choice. Actually, that goes for just about everyone, alien to the planet or not. Unless, of course, my menu normally consisted of nutjobs in RVs and on motorcycles.

    1. Re:Seriously, aliens, stay away. by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yep. I think my first choice would be to masquerade as a portly, tight-lipped and secretive vice president that had the strings to an idiot marionette of a president.

      Ahhhh... The power...

    2. Re:Seriously, aliens, stay away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What power? You're capable of traversing the cosmos, and the best you can come up with is jerking around Dubya?

      Please. That's for amateurs. Roswell's where it's at - tens of thousands of people just begging to be probed.

      Now that's a good weekend.

    3. Re:Seriously, aliens, stay away. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were an alien, landing in the midst of 50,000 "worshippers" in a town of 45,000 people in SE New Mexico would NOT be my first choice.


      It wouldn't be your and my first choice. Whell, I always thought most stars (rock, movie, ...) were aliens, so that fits.
      Paris H. must be the mother of them all. Cut over to 'species' scene.
  5. They're Really Here! by camperslo · · Score: 4, Funny

    They've come in under radar... from Mexico

  6. What are the chances? by Svippy · · Score: 1

    That aliens read the Washington Post and speak English?

    --
    Clicked pie.
    1. Re:What are the chances? by Tim_UWA · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say pretty close to the chances that they read the Washington Post. Unless you can think of a reason a non-English speaker would read it.

    2. Re:What are the chances? by niceone · · Score: 1

      That aliens read the Washington Post

      Good point - they probably read one of the down-market tabloids that take alien abductions etc. seriously enough to devote extensive coverage to them.

    3. Re:What are the chances? by tchdab1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It often seems as if a non-English speaker writes it.

    4. Re:What are the chances? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Have you never watched Stargate? All aliens speak English.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:What are the chances? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      That's only because they learned English from English-speaking Klingons.

    6. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NuqneH? What makes you think they wouldn't have learned to speak English in the 60 years they've been studying us? (and that's 60 years that we know of, some people believe that a certain guy from Bethlehem was actually an alien spy.)

      And what makes you think they would even need to? More humans speak Klingon than there are those who speak Esperanto, and we've never even been near to the planet.

      [BTW, 'NuqneH' is as close a translation as Klingon has for 'Hello']

  7. More interesting sight.. by ivan_w · · Score: 1
    The fact that Chase Masterson (the DS9 "Dabo" girl) will be attending is probably more interesting (and definitely more probable) than potential aliens showing up ;)

    --Ivan

    1. Re:More interesting sight.. by TransEurope · · Score: 1

      Ah, damn. I hoped for the guy who held the spotlights during the shots. 'cause of his qualified technical knowledge ;-)

  8. Attend this festival instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. American only belief? by renoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read on the Internet (so it must be true) that 50% of the Americans believe that there are aliens on the earth, I wonder why so many Americans?

    In France, from my informal questions hardly no-one believes in aliens living on the earth, of course on the other hand we have our own myths, for example the Graphological analysis (believing that you can know someone by looking how his writing look) which is very widespread: you almost always have to do one to get a high-paying job..

    1. Re:American only belief? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It may have to do with all of the covering up that is being done.

    2. Re:American only belief? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read on the Internet (so it must be true) that 50% of the Americans believe that there are aliens on the earth, 50% voted for Bush, sounds plausible to me.

      I wonder why so many Americans? It's all explained in full here:
      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/credulous

      --
      Deleted
    3. Re:American only belief? by kripkenstein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read on the Internet (so it must be true) that 50% of the Americans believe that there are aliens on the earth, I wonder why so many Americans?

      In France, from my informal questions hardly no-one believes in aliens living on the earth, of course on the other hand we have our own myths, for example the Graphological analysis (believing that you can know someone by looking how his writing look)
      Why? Well, why do Americans like fast food or blockbuster movies? It's a cultural thing. UFOs are as much American as Bruce Willis action flicks or interest in people like Paris Hilton.

      Why specifically are UFOs an American cultural thing? Well, for some reason in the US many conspiracy theories thrive (JFK assassination, etc.), perhaps because there have been plenty of actual conspiracies: Nixon, Iran-Contra, and so forth. (Or do all countries have conspiracies, but the US is better at finding them? Who knows.) The US has a thread of anti-establishment thought that is quite strong, this might also factor into it.

      That, and sci-fi was very big in the US around the middle of the century; the Roswell incident - whatever happened there - was in the right place at the right time.
    4. Re:American only belief? by LuNa7ic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Or do all countries have conspiracies, but the US is better at finding them? Who knows.) Or worse at hiding them...
      --
      *runs*
    5. Re:American only belief? by foobsr · · Score: 1

      That very large majorities of the American public, and almost all (but not all) Christians believe in God, the survival of the soul after death, miracles, heaven, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, and the Virgin birth will come as no great surprise. What may be more surprising is that half of all adults believe in ghosts, almost a third believe in astrology, and more than a quarter believe in reincarnation - that they were themselves reincarnated from other people. Majorities of about two-thirds of all adults believe in hell and the devil, but hardly anybody expects that they will go to hell themselves.(emphasis mine)

      From "The Harris Poll® #11, February 26, 2003 - The Religious and Other Beliefs of Americans 2003"

      Somehow does not fit very well with the picture of the "cutting edge US" that mainstream media deploys in Europe.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    6. Re:American only belief? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Or both, even.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    7. Re:American only belief? by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      I read on the Internet (so it must be true) that 50% of the Americans believe that there are aliens on the earth


      Yet there's so much resistance to the idea that George W Bush and his father before him are really shape-shifting lizard creatures with a hidden agenda. Go figure.
    8. Re:American only belief? by bortizc · · Score: 1

      I have this theory: it is due to american isolationism. Americans would rather believe (from 1950-2001) that their biggest threat came from outer space. The goverment was happy with that belief; it let them do as they pleased in other parts of the world ---guatemala, iran, cuba, chile, vietnam, grenada, panama, etc---while the american people speculated on alien abductions. It all ended the 11th of september of 2001. Now it is all a nostalgia of a better time.

    9. Re:American only belief? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do half of the Americans believe there are aliens among us, or are half of the Americans aliens?

      What human being would ask for ketchup with his oysters? What human would believe 'health food' means french fries without the molten cheese?

    10. Re:American only belief? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SF (the proper term, 'sci-fi' is an invention of the movie/TV industry) was actually much smaller at the time of the Roswell incident than it is today (I'm talking about literature BTW, not those western movies in a space setting the likes of Lucas spurt out).

      In the "golden era" of SF (Heinlein, Asimov, etc.), most SF novels appeared first as serials in magazines, because they couldn't find a publisher who would print the stuff in book form. Today, those same magazines have trouble finding any material to publish besides short stories, while nearly all SF novels appear directly in book form, for a large part directly in hardcover as first edition.

      Not only that, the sheer number of new SF novels per year is at least 50 times what it was 60 years ago.

    11. Re:American only belief? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I read on the Internet (so it must be true) that 50% of the Americans believe that there are aliens on the earth, I wonder why so many Americans?

      It's because they trust what the read on the Internet :-)

    12. Re:American only belief? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      It's more to do with the US's dissident origins, and the ingrained belief in the American psyche that people in positions of power are constantly trying to screw them over.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  10. If you're in the area, go! by dave-tx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously - if you're in the general area (as much as THAT can be said in New Mexico), go to Roswell. My wife and I stopped by during the 50th anniversary and had a blast. It's a cute town, and when it's overrun by UFO nuts and X-Files fans, it's just plain silly.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    1. Re:If you're in the area, go! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend the production at the community theater (joke) and the observatory (the trip highlight). The parade is a joke.....of course, I lived in New Orleans for a while and sort of have a totally different perspective on parades.

      Layne

    2. Re:If you're in the area, go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On second thought, let's not go to Roswell. It is a silly place.

  11. Jerry Pournelle by jenesais · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Jerry Pournelle commented on Roswell recently: http://www.jerrypournelle.com/mail/mail473.html#Ro swell. Pournelle says that because he was involved with the USAF Project 75 technology survey, he would have had access to any information that could have helped with defense planning. He originally suspected that the USAF had dropped a nuke that didn't exploded ("laid an egg" as he puts it) near Roswell.

    --
    N/A
    1. Re:Jerry Pournelle by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      If you read onward, he's also a global warming denier. Sounds like a loyal bushie.

    2. Re:Jerry Pournelle by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      If you read onward, he's also a global warming denier. Sounds like a loyal bushie.

      Is that really the best you can do? You can't conceive of any reason beyond partisan politics that someone might not have completely bought the notion that - absent humans living their lives - there wouldn't be any climate change going on? You're confusing people who think that the breathless fearmongering being used to push socializing policy agendas and a more government-centric regulatory environment is something worth resisting... with people who can't believe that human activity plays some (as yet poorly or not at all defined) role in climate shifting. That you won't bother acknowledging that reality makes you (not Pournelle) the "loyalist," rather than your own independt and critical thinker.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Jerry Pournelle by Threni · · Score: 1

      > You can't conceive of any reason beyond partisan politics that someone might not have completely bought the notion that - absent
      > humans living their lives - there wouldn't be any climate change going on?

      The question is usually `are humans contributing to global warming`, not `is there global warming`. I don't see that an affirmative answer to the latter question is treated as being particularly controversial.

    4. Re:Jerry Pournelle by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The question is usually `are humans contributing to global warming`, not `is there global warming`. I don't see that an affirmative answer to the latter question is treated as being particularly controversial.

      Of course there is warming. It's been happening for at least 15,000 years since the last ice age (except when it's not). That's not the point. The point is that when people push back against the Gore-type message that humans are THE (as in, THE ONLY) cause of climate change, they're called "deniers." It's absurd.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Jerry Pournelle by manowar821 · · Score: 1

      Sure, he is questioning whether or not global warming is caused by humans NOW. A while ago? He was probably questioning whether or not global warming was even happening. That's how these people work. He doesn't want to agree, but he has to seem like he's considering the opposition and it's views. Most of the people who are questioning our part in global warming were at one time questioning the very existence of global warming.

      Anyway, he's most obviously in league with the other politicians and cronies. They get a hard-on from covering up stories, lying, and being generally bad people. Why should be believe a damn word he says?

      No, I don't like government workers. I'm not a troll, I swear.

      --
      Internet: Serious Business
  12. Free energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone hook up the generator. Carl Sagan just hit 50,000 rpm in his grave.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Demon-Haunted_Wor ld

    1. Re:Free energy by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't Carl Sagan spinning in his grave be direct proof of life (of at least intelligence) after death as well as a mystic force capable of moving physical objects in unnatural ways with said mind?

      I'm just saying, it's pretty ironic if you think about it. Maybe he's spinning in his grave because he's spinning in his grave?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  13. Cover up? by iknownuttin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The U.S. government, of course, has issued its share of reports debunking UFOs. Here in Roswell, those reports are generally seen as desperate attempts to whitewash the truth.

    Wasn't there a ton of UFO sightings when the USAF was testing the F-117? As top secret that stealth aircraft was, the US Gov. eventually announced it.

    And, whenever the US Gov. really wants to keep a secret - they can't - can you say Abu Ghraib or bombing in Cambodia, and wiretapping US citizens and violating the Fourth Amendment?

    Sorry, I think between incompetence in Gov. and just decent people in the World (I guess I'm getting soft in my old age), any secrets won't stay secret very long.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Cover up? by TrekkieGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, whenever the US Gov. really wants to keep a secret - they can't

      Well, if an alien spacecraft really did crash in Roswell, they did a horrible job of keeping it a secret. For starters, they screwed up and the USAF initially announced they had recovered a flying saucer. Then they went back on the claim and said it was a weather balloon. Now we're all talking about it, multiple movies have been made...if you say "Roswell" to someone, they know what you're talking about. And that's from 1947, when it was a lot easier to destroy records than it is today.

      I know, you still don't believe it happened. Neither do I (the US would have a serious technological advantage over everyone else. Where's my flying car?). And yet, when you hear about wiretapping of US citizens you do believe it. The difference is that one claim is reasonable and the other is not. When news escape of the wiretapping or of the Abu Ghraib incident, we believe it until the government can prove otherwise (and obviously they can't, because it's true). When we hear of captured aliens, we think it's bs, and it's the conspiracy theorist job to prove it did happen. Whoever has the burder of proof has a serious disadvantage in either situation.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    2. Re:Cover up? by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm just gonna poke a couple holes and it won't hurt too much, I promise. First Abu Ghraib, do you honestly think that the government wanted that to be a secret. They didn't even know what was going on there, secret things are handled by people with *gasp* security clearances. How many of those guys do you think that were working there have them? The correct answer for the people directly involved with the offenses is none and if any of them did they have now lost them. The point being is that facility was in no way whatsoever secure or secret. Now for Cambodia, I can't say too much about that since it was before my time and I'm too lazy to read up on it so I'm going agree with you there that it may have been incompetence. Wiretapping citizens, again they employed a civilian company full of people that do not have security clearances. Have you ever met anyone in the NSA? I mean the guys that do the real work? Let me tell you those are some scary smart guys and they can think about things from more angles than you can imagine. They knew that eventually it would get out and you know what, I'm pretty sure that they counted on that fact.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  14. someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please tag this topic with "religion" lol

  15. How about a double cover up ? by ivan_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok.. Let me, just for a sec, take the conspiracy theory just a tad further...

    Let's say the government has something REALLY big to hide.. What could be one of its approach.. Well : Take an insignificant incident and PRETEND it's a cover up (that is, give obviously phony explanations, use wandering and puzzled looks during media conferences, have people sign funny papers, etc..).. For the 60 years to come, people are going to be going CRAZY about *this* particular cover-up (which may incidentally - should the double cover up theory be true - not even be one, but rather an elaborate hoax).

    Now *THAT* is conspiracy !

    --Ivan

    (PS : I'm not actually buying this - and believe it or not, I'm going with the weather balloon gone awry explanation)..

    1. Re:How about a double cover up ? by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      oh come on..
      its obvious...
      it's not cause they want to HIDE something its because they knew that ~50 years on there would be massive *festival* there, boosting the economy...
      the economy... everyone knows thats what the US government cares about the most.

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
  16. Sagan said there was no coverup. by iknownuttin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Carl Sagan just hit 50,000 rpm in his grave.

    Unfortunately, the Wikipedia article doesn't have what he said about the UFO thing.

    To paraphrase from memory, Sagan said that he had the security clearances and access and he saw nothing about the Gov. covering up space aliens.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Sagan said there was no coverup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sagan said that he had the security clearances and access and he saw nothing about the Gov. covering up space aliens.


      A dopesmoker with government security clearances and access? Ha! That's a good one!

      Those who control the trade and extortive law enforcement would never allow such a thing. Free thinkers are far too dangerous.

      Not that I necessarily think there was a coverup or any actual aliens, I just find it very hard to believe that government/military would place their trust in a known toker.
    2. Re:Sagan said there was no coverup. by hey! · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase from memory, Sagan said that he had the security clearances and access and he saw nothing about the Gov. covering up space aliens.


      Well, at the risk of jumping into the lunatic fringe, that doesn't prove anything at all. Having a security clearance does not entitle you to to be informed on everything that you might be allowed to know. It depends on whether the people in charge of the project decide it is useful for you to know. Even worse, an individual might knowingly or unknowingly be part of a misinformation campaign, if it were something the government felt it needed hushed up.

      You can't take any individual's word when it comes to a conspiracy. There are two places to attack a conspiracy theory: the motivations of the conspiracy, and the positive evidence for the conspiracy. The UFO coverup theory fails on both accounts. If the US recovered an alien spaceship and crew, there is no real compelling reason for it to be kept quiet, especially once the rumors get started.

      The UFO community's proof of its view is constructed from weak inferences from sparse data. Data from pictures and videos are analyzed by self-appointed experts, not people trained in photogrammetry and other useful technical fields. Furthermore, even granting the "unexplainable" nature of UFOs, there is little reason to accept the narrative they choose to explain the data. What is the proof that makes visitors from other star systems a more plausible explanation than sensor glitches or weather balloons?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Sagan said there was no coverup. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase from memory, Sagan said that he had the security clearances and access and he saw nothing about the Gov. covering up space aliens.

      And you believe him? Who do you think told him all that stuff he knows? How does he know that there are exactly billions and billions of stars? Answer that.

    4. Re:Sagan said there was no coverup. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Sagan said that he had the security clearances and access and he saw nothing about the Gov. covering up space aliens.

      He apparently doesn't know what "cover-up" means.

      Anyone not actually sitting as an officer of the United States with purview over aliens -- that is, DoD, CIA, FBI, President, Vice President -- needs to recognize that they may be wrong.

    5. Re:Sagan said there was no coverup. by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 1

      Your fear of dope smokers is laughable, as is your unstated assumption that they are a security risk in some way.

      On the other hand, from my point of view, Sagan was actually just a hack (even though very likelable), and was more of a PR man than a real scientist. He also never actually had a good, original idea in his life although he was very talented at explaining other peoples ideas to the general public.

      So I would phrase the rebuttal more like:

      "Why would the US Government give Top Secret "eyes only" access to the 1970's equivalent of a Fox Science News reporter?"

  17. Disclosure Project by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This my friend, might have something to do with it: 22 out of 400 senior Government, CIA & Military & NASA officials went public admitting UFO's and aliens are real.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk

    Also, France & Mexico governments are supposed to be releasing all the info they have on the subject soon, if they haven't already done so.

    Adeptus

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Disclosure Project by gardyloo · · Score: 0

      I just did. I'd like ~ 116 minutes of my life back, please.

    2. Re:Disclosure Project by His+Shadow · · Score: 1
      And millions of Americans have admitted publicly that they believe Jesus will come out of the clouds to destoy civilisation and kill everyone who disagrees with their particuliar religious viewpoint.

      Where is your evidence ?

      --

      Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos

    3. Re:Disclosure Project by StarfishOne · · Score: 1
      France has released its 'cometa' report: http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm


      In 1999 an important document was published in France entitled, UFOs and Defense: What must we be prepared for? ("Les Ovni Et La Defense: A quoi doit-on se préparer?"). This ninety-page report is the result of an in-depth study of UFOs, covering many aspects of the subject, especially questions of national defense. The study was carried out over several years by an independent group of former "auditors" at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, and by qualified experts from various fields. Before its public release, it has been sent to French President Jacques Chirac and to Prime Minister Lionel Jospin. The report is prefaced by General Bernard Norlain of the Air Force, former Director of IHEDN, and it begins with a preamble by André Lebeau, former President of the National Center for Space Studies (Centre National D'études Spatiales), or CNES, the French equivalent of NASA. The group itself, collective author of the report, is an association of experts, many of whom are or have been auditors of IHEDN, and it is presided over by General Denis Letty of the Air Force, former auditor (FA) of IHEDN.
  18. Disclosure Project by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

    How about you watch this? You know... the Internationally broadcast episode where 22 out of 400 Senior Military, Government & NASA officials admit publicly UFO's are real.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUk [youtube.com]

    Adeptus

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
  19. groom lake closed??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    maybe you should check it out on google earth. even on google earth there is a plane on the tarmac and visible markings all over the area. maybe they are bomb targets, but why would you need a bomb target at a non functioning base. and wouldn't the classic target symbol be good enough instead of crazy geometric shapes like triangles inside of circles. the "targets" are not necessarily a big deal (maybe) but the plane sitting on the tarmac says that someones home.

    1. Re:groom lake closed??? by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a recent closure and the google pic is several years old? Just guessing on this, mind you.

      qz

    2. Re:groom lake closed??? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      HAHAHA!

      The picture of Groom Lake is years old, same is the picture were they moved. If you knew the new location and looked at it with Google Earth, it would look like a normal wooded area.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  20. No, really! by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was in the gym the other day, and the "Discovery Channel" had a show on about Mexican UFO sightings. Apparently, Mexico is the hot new location for "UFOlogists".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:No, really! by linguizic · · Score: 1

      I hear you can get a degree in UFology from the correspondence college of Tampa.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    2. Re:No, really! by niktemadur · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was in the gym the other day, and the "Discovery Channel" had a show on about Mexican UFO sightings. Apparently, Mexico is the hot new location for "UFOlogists".

      It's this guy's fault: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Maussan

      He used to be a serious reporter (an anchorman for the mexican 60 Minutes), but in the last decade or two he's made a mint holding conferences all over Mexico about the grays and illuminati and all sorts of rubbishy things. Whenever he's on television (which is often), his appearances sound like paid advertisements for his conferences. And I know people who attend and believe, too.

      Last I heard (a few years ago), he was saying that an alien bracelet had come into his possession, with the line that top scientists had analyzed the artifact and were baffled by its' properties. Of course, these are scientists neither you or I have ever heard of, and ditto for the lab that supposedly performed the tests. If he even gave any names, which I'm not sure about.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  21. The big untold story by hey! · · Score: 1

    The big untold story is the implantation of microscopic mind control devices in ordinary aluminum foil. Remember, always buy the store brand.

    Wait a minute, why did I just say that?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Why not link to slashdot ? by aepervius · · Score: 4, Informative

    walter haut, and I'll repeat what I said there : a confession discussed in 2000, made in 2002 for a death in 2005 is a way wee bit exagerated for the term "deathbed". Furthermore There is no way the guy would want to attract glory after his death. No, he was clearly impartial. wait wasn't it the guy with the ufo museum ? And wasn't it the guy which pretended that the US army would be stupid enough to ask casket (kid sized) from a local mortician ? I am surprised that some people give credence to this. Finally I'll deathbed confess that I know where a lot of gold is. Since it will be on my deathbed that will make it automatically true.

    Come on, next you will tell me silvia browne conatct the dead, Steorn has got free energy, and geller really bend spoon with his will. What next ? Homeopathy, the way hahneman described it, works perfectly ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Why not link to slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, next you will tell me silvia browne conatct the dead, Steorn has got free energy, and geller really bend spoon with his will. What next ? Homeopathy, the way hahneman described it, works perfectly ?

      Yes. It's all true. The debunking was all fraud. Gawd, they sure pulled the wool over your eyes! Get with the program son. Universities textbooks are always way behind the leading edge of science. Where have you been? Everyone on slashdot knows this already. Next your gonna tell me you haven't noticed the swarms of hundreds/thousands of UFOs in orbit?

    2. Re:Why not link to slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >next you will tell me silvia browne conatct the dead

      I think that conactcting the dead is illegal in most civilized countries? Well, I'm guessing, because I have no idea what "conactct" means. Care to define it for the rest of us? I know that children often have their own language, which is comprised of made-up words, but, you'll forgive the rest of us if we don't understand yours?

      Your spelling, grammar and comportment are generally poor - I'm embarassed for you, honestly I am. Not your fault - blame your parents.

      >Finally I'll deathbed confess that I know where a lot of gold is.
      Can you do it quickly, please?

      Thanks in advance.

    3. Re:Why not link to slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paranormal nuts are a pathetic bunch...

      Put away your tin foil hat and step outside. Go for a walk. Get a temp job. Stop applying for jobs at SETI or pretending you can tell what card someone has in their hadn.

      Just please do something that makes you a valuable member of Society.

  23. The Manhattan Project by DavidHumus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've always thought it an interesting coincidence that the Roswell myth dates from about the same time that the Manhattan Project - which was an actual large-scale government cover-up - became public knowledge.

    Not only that, but Alamogordo is less than a hundred miles from Roswell.

    1. Re:The Manhattan Project by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, but the atomic bomb was used in 1945, which means that its' existence obviously had to be public knowledge by 1947, which is when Roswell happened. Thus, there wouldn't be much sense in trying to cover that up.

  24. Slashdot, skeptics, and Roswell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Roswell is one of the greatest misdirections ever pulled off by the government and no credible Ufologist pays it any attention.

    Slashdotters love to pat themselves on the back by pointing out the all the inconsistencies in the Roswell story. Newsflash - ufologists have known about these for years, and Roswell itself is only considered a conspiracy by the New Agers and self-styled Agent Mulders of the world.

    Want to poke holes in a REAL ufo mystery? Take a look at Tehran 1976 or Malmstrom AFB.

    1. Re:Slashdot, skeptics, and Roswell by Babbster · · Score: 1

      ...credible Ufologist...

      I'm sorry, but I can't read the rest of your post because I'm too busy laughing myself to death at this amusing turn of phrase.
    2. Re:Slashdot, skeptics, and Roswell by ettlz · · Score: 1

      ...credible Ufologist...
      I'm sorry, but I can't read the rest of your post because I'm too busy laughing myself to death at this amusing turn of phrase.
      Way to insult Sun Ra's biographer.
    3. Re:Slashdot, skeptics, and Roswell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credible Ufologist? Er... What?

  25. Stupid question. by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    What exactly does the Government have to gain by a conspiracy?

    Stop widespread public panic? would the panic be anymore than the terrorism panic?

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Stupid question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the point. It wouldn't cause a panic. Many many people believe in UFOs now. I don't see them panicking. Nor are people panicking after 911. Get a grip. There is no reason for a cover-up.

  26. Oblig. Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Leela: No, over here! (reads headline) Flying saucer captured!
    Bender: That's no flying saucer! That's my ass!
    Fry: My God! This means the flying saucer that crashed in Roswell... was us!
    Farnsworth: And the alien they captured was... was...

    Cut to aircraft hangar, where soldiers pry open a crate, revealing....

    Zoidberg: Hello!
    General: Eegh!
    Zoidberg: So what are you guys doing tonight? I'm up for whatever.

    1. Re:Oblig. Futurama by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Farnsworth: Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr. "I'm my own grandfather."

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  27. no real compelling reason for it to be kept quiet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >If the US recovered an alien spaceship and crew, there is no real compelling reason
    >for it to be kept quiet, especially once the rumors get started.

    Of course there is a good reason: Jews.

    If aliens exist then their whole mythology about the chosen people goes down the drain...

    Its all the jews fault.

  28. What's that sound? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Is the sound of 100,000 parents rejoicing that their children have finally left their basements.

  29. All aliens. Come on down: Easy to say! by ls671 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Easy to say, I am an alien actually reading /. from another galaxy through an ip v256 subspace tunnel (we have a few secret gateways on your planet). I see no mention of travel expenses being reimboursed. I so, I might consider showing up. It just seems to me they want to make money off our poor alien backs so far...

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  30. UFOs not an "American only belief" by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not that I am defending the motives and beliefs of the "True Believers" that gather in Roswell for these kinds of things, but ... anyone familiar with the history of belief in UFO's, Flying Saucers and Alien saviours can tell you that UFO's are certainly not an "American Only" phenomenon.

    If you check the data, only the belief in Alien Abductions and the whole "Grey aliens stole my baby" thing can truly be said to have originated in America or to be exclusive to American culture.

    UFO *sightings* on the other hand, and the UFO phenomenon in general (regardless of whatever the cause turns out to be), are pretty much uniform over all cultures and take the same general form in each. Often a small amount of local cultural belief is overlaid on the data set, but the data itself is very homogeneous and consistent across cultures.

  31. it's too late by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    It would have been nice to know about this a few days ago; the festival started Thursday and today is the last day. I'm not exactly close but I'm not too far; a road trip would not have been out of the question. The Washington Post article makes it sound like the 50,000 are "expected" to show up -- making it seem as if this thing will go on for a few more days. But according to this article, it ends today.

  32. UFOs in the Vedas by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    UFOs in the Vedas were called "Vimana", which in Hindu is used now to refer to aerial aircrafts. The difference being that these were not really "UFOs" (Unidentified Flying Objects), but more like "flying saucers", which had all kinds of shapes like: triangles, saucer shapes, sigar shapes, huge bowls and shapes more resembling our aerodynamic crafts of today. Another exception also being that some of these ancient crafts could travel in space, in the air, in the water and below water too. They behaved much like present days observation of UFOs (which has been observed in the whole history of mankind).

    Unfortunately, these crafts were used for warfare, and the civilizations possessing them fell back to a "stone age", much like we fear is possible if we dont evolve our spiritual values beyond our technological capabilities soon.

    Check out for yourself what Wikipedia says about "Vimana"

    Any UFO enthusiast should know the history between how Atlantis tried to subjugate and "conquer" the whole world. While the Vedic Rama-civilization, were also of such capabilities and having a war with Atlantis. Atlantis sunk below the ocean and disappeared completely as a civilization, while Rama remains in what is now known as the Vedic knowledge and the traditions in India and neighbouring countries.

    Best part is that most of the manuscripts in Sanskrit is yet to be translated. Time for an open source effort to translate the remaining Vedic scrolls anyone? Any geek knows his salt should know his Sanskrit and Vedic knowledge!

    Samarangana Sutradhara (Literally, "controller of the battlefield"), it is written:

            "Strong and durable must the body of the Vimana be made, like a great flying bird of light material. Inside one must put the mercury engine with its iron heating apparatus underneath. By means of the power latent in the mercury which sets the driving whirlwind in motion, a man sitting inside may travel a great distance in the sky. The movements of the Vimana are such that it can vertically ascend, vertically descend, move slanting forwards and backwards. With the help of the machines human beings can fly in the air and heavenly beings can come down to earth."

    Also in Mesapotanian sources you find such statements:
    The Hakatha (Laws of the Babylonians) states quite unambiguously:
            "The privilege of operating a flying machine is great. The knowledge of flight is among the most ancient of our inheritances. A gift from 'those from upon high'. We received it from them as a means of saving many lives."

    According to the Dronaparva, part of the Mahabarata, and the Ramayana, one Vimana described was shaped like a sphere and born along at great speed on a mighty wind generated by mercury. It moved like a UFO, going up, down, backwards and forwards as the pilot desired. In another Indian source, the Samar, Vimanas were "iron machines, well-knit and smooth, with a charge of mercury that shot out of the back in the form of a roaring flame." Another work called the Samaranganasutradhara describes how the vehicles were constructed. It is possible that mercury did have something to do with the propulsion, or more possibly, with the guidance system. Curiously, Soviet scientists have discovered what they call "age-old instruments used in navigating cosmic vehicles" in caves in Turkestan and the Gobi Desert. The "devices" are hemispherical objects of glass or porcelain, ending in a cone with a drop of mercury inside.

    Interesting read wether you believe it or not, it is still there!

    1. Re:UFOs in the Vedas by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. The Vedas wrote some interesting Bronze Age fantasy tales indeed. That is, however, what they were. You don't get the technology to fly mechanical craft with atomic weapons and then land on the ground to fight it out with maces or ride around on traditional chariots with traditional charioteers firing massive volumes of traditional and fantasy arrows. This is the bulk of the Dronaparva battle epic.

    2. Re:UFOs in the Vedas by ross.w · · Score: 1

      You've never seen Phantom Menace have you?

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    3. Re:UFOs in the Vedas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately these particular "vedic texts" were written by a new-age "translator" in the 20th century.

    4. Re:UFOs in the Vedas by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      This would be spectacular, except that the apparatus as described does not function. A great hullabaloo has been made regarding ancient civilizations' supposed technological advances, and yet not one of them wrote of molecular structures, proteins, chemistry and knowledge of the elements, or materials science of composites or alloys.

      If building flying machines as described in your post, one must understand the physical principles of flight, aerodynamics, and center of gravity for the device. The descriptions of these magical texts are always overly vague and no actual mechanism of any purpose can be built according to them. It would then appear that these ancient texts are not conclusively indicative of an advanced technological achievement.

  33. No Wonder..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    First, the Government denies the existence of aliens in the United States.

    Then, the Government says that there is a problem with aliens in the United States.

    THEN, the Government continues to deny that there ever were aliens in the United States, but simultaneously continues to say that aliens are flooding into the country at a rate of millions per year.

    I can see where those Roswell people may be more than a bit confused.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:No Wonder..... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

      Brilliant reply! I'll go further - if there is a single slashdotter out there that can tell me with a straight face that they believe a government as inept as the US could keep the greatest secret in human history, but take almost four days to get a glass of clean water to the Superdome in New Orleans (Yeah, remember those guys, *our own* citizens? They're STILL waiting for help!) then I'll meet you down in Roswell...I truly DO hope they find intelligent life in outer space because lately there's a serious dearth of it here!

  34. Superstition is the curse of mankind by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of superstitions to go around, starting with the one that causes the most misery -- the belief in a sky-spook(s). I am only slightly amused when god-believers look down their noses at UFO-believers, astrologers, graphologists, fortune-tellers/seers, and other such that have no grounding in reality. Superstition appears to me to be the basic state of humanity.

    1. Re:Superstition is the curse of mankind by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention -- I was born in Roswell, NM ;)

  35. Re:American only belief? UFO fleets spotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, here is some interesting video of UFO fleets over Peru and Mexico. Mass sighting mid-day. All I can say is they are unidentified, I'm not going to insist they're alien, but some of the vids I've seen before out on the net (rense/google video/youtube/etc) stuff doesn't look terrestrial or military to me.

    UFO Fleet in Lima, Peru ... May 2007
    Large Fleet of UFO's in the skies over Mexico City
    UFO fleet over Guadalajara Mexico in 2004

    Anyways, I dunno what those are. I think balloons is the wrong answer. But I've seen more video of these out there. I find it amusing/entertaining, and there are definitely some very good unexplained mysterious UFO cases out there. And I've have talked to people I trust who say they have been face to face with a real alien/ET/gray type before. So as far as I'm concerned the phenomenon is real. There are ETs here watching, interacting with a small number of humans. And then in the public it's a lot of muddy water, hoaxes, idiots, false sightings, military stuff, etc etc. It's really convoluted. But the truth is out there :-)

  36. The only extraterrestrials you'll find... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    ...at this event will be the ones in the audience. Although in their case, I suspect "intraterrestrials," might be a more accurate term. ;-)

  37. not that crazy by Traa · · Score: 1

    Make fun of these people all you want, but as far as I am concerned these people have a better chance of their wishes/beliefs to come true (meeting an alien) then a religious person has of hoping to talk to any of his divine entities (god, christ, angles, ...). To be really fair in this comparison, those waiting for aliens "have" a chance.

  38. Toxoplasma tacoii by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Yet another troll story. Clearly brain parasites, possibly of alien origin, have infected CmdrTaco's brain. I can see no other reasonable explanation for all the stories on Roswell and perpetual motion machines of late on Slashdot. I wish we could Digg this story down.

    It doesn't belong under science. Not even close. Is there a pseudoscience category?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Toxoplasma tacoii by manowar821 · · Score: 1

      Funny you should bitch about trolling. Go back to church. 3

      --
      Internet: Serious Business
    2. Re:Toxoplasma tacoii by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Church? WTF?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  39. Sheeple... by MoronBob · · Score: 1

    I have been to Roswell, NM and have seen all the exhibits. The stories are actually a brilliant idea hatched by a couple of local businessmen to resurrect a failing local economy. It has worked perfectly and continues to bring in more and more money to the Roswell economy. And yes I recommend going there and enjoying the sites. It was fun. It is also close to the Carlsbad Caverns which is well worth the trip.

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  40. Going loony by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 0

    I have no knowledge of the Belgium incident, but I do not ridicule UFO sightings. After all, a UFO is just something up in the sky that you can't identify. Happens all the time, and will continue to happen.

    But things must happen all the time that we can't explain. That's because (wait for it) we are not omniscient.

    The problem comes when people go from "can't fully explain it" to "space aliens". That's when things go loony. That's when people get dumb.

    To buy into the "space aliens" theory requires a truly convincing piece of evidence, not just an inability to explain something. Let's have some appreciation for our own limitations.

  41. UFOs are serious business by trelayne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    UFOs, whatever their origin, are an air safety hazard.

    There are literally thousands of credible, documented encounters between Civil/Military Aviation aircraft alone. See http://narcap.org/ headed by a retired NASA scientist who has scientifically categorized various air encounters, EM interferences, and near-collision events.

    The recent hovering UFO incident over the busy and restricted airspace of O'Hare airport is yet another example. The airline employees who reported the incident did so because they felt a craft of some sort was in an area that was clearly posing a threat. One of the employees, not comprehending the origin or dynamics of the object fearfully thought it was a terrorist attack.

    A MOD report released last year, although skeptical about little green men, acknowledged that UFOs appear to be a real phenomenon, likely natural and not yet understood. And it suggests that all pilots who encounter them stay away from them as they may be dangerous.

    Through (effectively) a campaign of ridicule (as expressed here and in other media), a phenomenon deserving of serious scientific inquiry is not being studied because researchers are afraid of being discredited. There really should be a scientific body collecting, and analyzing UFO data.

    The incidents of UFOs being reported in aviation is likely much smaller than the actual accounts for similar reasons.

    It's unfortunate that the problems and circus around the Roswell story are being used to further discourage trained observers, and first responders from reporting more incidents that would ultimately benefit science and technology.

  42. Other sightings by Boronx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anybody else remember when this got out? This video was broadcast live during a classroom discussion that included shuttle astronauts. It made the national news at the time and AFAIK is legit. I think NASA stopped doing live broadcasts of exernal video after this.

    I'm pretty sure the panning and zooming were added by the Youtuber, but the actions of the UFO in the picture are exactly as I remember from the news clips.

    1. Re:Other sightings by rtechie · · Score: 1

      It's ice people. Get a grip.

    2. Re:Other sightings by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I can believe that, but what caused the sudden acceleration?

    3. Re:Other sightings by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Deflection, puffs of air, possibly an optical effect. It certainly COULD be a lot of things. Why leap to the conclusion that it's an alien spaceship?

    4. Re:Other sightings by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

      that is very definitely either
      1. A weather balloon
      OR
      2. swamp marsh gas

      j/k

    5. Re:Other sightings by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't leap to such a conclusion

  43. gemini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    back in the 60s I was listening to live radio coverage of a gemini flight. The astronauts started excitedly talking about something they were seeing (implied UFO whatever, not space junk), then poof, the feed was cut, then later on they resumed and neither they nor the news ever referred to it again. Instant hushup. Pretty obvious, too. If it was junk, they would have talked about like "Nasa has figured out from trajectories the astronauts were seeing the blah blah satellite as it passed over...", but..nothing, like it never happened. I imagine google will find a reference to it, I am sure millions heard the broadcast, most of the missions back then pre empted all the channels on Tv and a lot of radio stations carried them live as well, because man-in-space was still a pretty big deal back then, exciting, etc. There might be some other slahdotters here who remember that.

  44. Oh It was real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course is a cover-up

    Everybody knows the F.B.I is looking for the 3 survivors and some roswellian friends, they seem to have a special bond for tabasco sauce

    If you happen to know their whereabouts or any tabasco related suspicious activity please contact the FBI special unit.
    :-D

  45. Sagan HAD to deny the Roswell cover-up(s)! by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

    Back then, had condescending and smug Sagan said there WAS a cover-up at Roswell, he would have lost his security clearance, grants and had to go on the (pre-internet, fledgling = starvation time for 'nutcases') UFO circuit.
    Literally and figuratively in his own 'Nuclear Winter' words, "BLOWN BACK TO ATOMS".
    Aside from said much touted 'Security Clearance', he was, at-the-end-of-the-day, THE FCC (government approved) FUD talking head.
    They lied. He died?
    Fame made no difference - PARIS!
    LOL.
    Ok ok already - I laugh at my own joke.
    RR
    PS. Psst! PARIS is the alien!
    OMG! It's full of nothing!

  46. say what? do some googling friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That has happened,the leaks occurred, it just gets ignored-on purpose. The disclosure project has hundreds of government insiders waiting for congressional immunity before they go on the record in public. If there's nothing there, why aren't they getting the immunity? They have a few dozen who have gone public anyway and they had a big news conference some years back at the national press club, then congress failed to act on it.

  47. People who so easily dismiss Roswell and UFO's by CitznFish · · Score: 0

    Are the same people who never looked into it aside from an occasional news story or blurb on the network TV news. Reading many of the comments on here it's obvious that it's easier for most people to ignore facts and just stick with what's comfortable to them. Ignorance is bliss.

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    1. Re:People who so easily dismiss Roswell and UFO's by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      I've been to Roswell, seen the museum. They had one piece that they claimed was actual debris from a craft. Affixed to its surface was a small spade-type electrical contact with a red rubber insulating grommet. As an electronics technician, I am extremely familiar with this connector family. It appeared completely mundane and terrestrial. The photographic evidence was also not particularly compelling. I require evidence before I profess belief in a thing, be it unicorns, ETs, or Bigfoot. I've researched and read up on as much UFOlogy as I can get my hands on, and my conclusion so far is that of the photographic evidence I've seen, many are hoaxes, some are atmospheric phenomena (lenticular clouds particularly), some are lens flares from a light source, and about 5% are too fuzzy to make any definitive conclusions on. I do, however believe aliens probably exist. I just don't think they're here yet. Your straw man argument that skeptics are nonbelievers because they are closed minded is a foolish attack. You would do better to offer compelling evidence to support your argument, rather than attacking your detractors.

    2. Re:People who so easily dismiss Roswell and UFO's by CitznFish · · Score: 0

      try looking up UFO Trace Evidence. There is real physical evidence left behind, not just a few cases either.

      Your straw man claim is utter BS as well. i didn't say they were close minded, I said they choose to ignore the facts because it's easier for them. IF anyone has done the research, and I doubt you have despite your claims, you would have a different conclusion.

      There are plenty of modern cases on record that have researchers baffled and convinced. (kecksberg, shag harbor (gov't admits it's a UFO), Brazil (trace evidence), Bentwaters AFB (physical trace evidence on the ground, audio recording of the event), Belgium triangle (photographic evidence and a Gov't that admits it's unidentified craft), UFO over Illinois (photographic evidence from one of many police officers that saw the craft)) I could name many many others. These cases have police/military witnesses. trained observers. Detailed reports. You can't just dismiss it unless you choose NOT to believe. You want more interesting cases then you just let me know.

      And what about teh video evidence from Israel and even Phoenix? When Isay Phoenix I am not talking about the flares that were dropped, I am talking about the UFO that was video taped in teh sky a few hours BEFORE the red flares were dropped and people freaked out. 2 separate incidents, yet the media only parlayed the flare story into an event. Both are well documented, and yeah, I think those were really flares that were video taped later in the night.

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  48. Not necessarily the same people writing the texts by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    You may have to consider the people writing/preserving the text were not necessarily the same people using- or making the apparatus. Much has been lost, indeed since most of the world described is totally gone - back to a stone age world.

    Much of the Vedas were never actually written, but remembered in an oral tradition, passed down from generation to generation.

    You may find similar things in the Bible. Start reading from Ezekiel 1, and see if you can find the sci-fi story that unfolds there. Of course, the description is almost unrecognizable, but if you have an open mind, you will find it there.

    It makes me laugh when I hear about people dismissing alien abductions just because it is a "new" phenomena, when in fact, in every religion, in every ancient tradition, you will find the same mystical elements, the same descriptions. Crop-cirlces were believed to be faeries, or the devil bending the crop (there is an old picture of this). I believe there is some truth to these things, but you have to investigate it properly with an open mind to find the truth - and not what you want to find. This goes both for "believers" and "disbelievers".

  49. Dr. Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14) says it was a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a recently recorded podcast with Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 astronaut and sixth man to walk on the moon, see here:

    http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2007/07/th e_art_of_being.html

    Dr. Mitchell, who grew up on a ranch just outside Roswell, says in the interview that as an adult, and astronaut, he talked with many of the principals in the Roswell story, and that while he can't prove what they were saying he does believe it was a UFO, and that there was a coverup.