Slashdot Mirror


Thousands of Rubber Ducks to Finally End Journey

Bert de Jong writes "The Daily Mail reports that thousands of rubber ducks who have traveled the seas of the world since 1992 are about to end their journey. After escaping out of a container fallen off a Chinese freight ship in a storm, scientists have been followed them on their fifteen year trek. This has turned out to be an invaluable source of information for studying ocean currents. Now it seems inevitable though that they will finally land on the shores of South-West England. '[Oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer] correctly predicted what many thought was impossible - that thousands of them would end up washed into the Arctic ice near Alaska, and then move at a mile a day, frozen in the pack ice, around their very own North-West Passage to the Atlantic. It proved true years later and in 2003, the first Friendly Floatees were found, frozen and then thawed out, on the eastern seaboard of the U.S. and Canada. So precious to science are they that the US firm that made them is offering a £50 bounty for finding one.'"

210 comments

  1. frosty duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'm a turtle

    1. Re:frosty duck by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0, Funny

      I'm a turtle
      What are you standing on?
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  2. How can they identify one ducky from another? by apathy+maybe · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I've just come up with a new money making scheme!

    1) Goto shop and purchase large amounts of rubber duckies
    2) Emerse them in water and ice for a few years and so
    3) Sell them to this company for 50 pounds each
    4) Profit!

    More seriously, maybe scientists should be getting more brightly coloured floating objects and chucking them in the sea at various points. What about red for Russia (two types, one for each coast), yellow for (no I won't go there...) and various other colours for other countries.

    A great way to learn more about ocean currents.

    But they would get into trouble with (some) environmentalists, maybe they need to just "accidentally" knock a few more crates overboard?

    --
    I wank in the shower.
    1. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But they would get into trouble with (some) environmentalists, maybe they need to just "accidentally" knock a few more crates overboard? Only the completely stupid ones. As far as I'm concerned you can pour as many chemically inert (well, Ok - relatively inert) plastic ducks as are needed into where ever they are required. It's the untreated sewage/industrial waste that I object to (and plastic bags because they look like jellyfish to whales and leatherback turtles).
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by apathy+maybe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hence the "(some)" in that quote. Personally I agree with you, and I consider my self to be an environmentalist.

      Of course, oceanographers already do this sort of thing, though not on such a large scale (with so many objects I mean). And of course, they use modern technology, including satellites (See for example http://vathena.arc.nasa.gov/curric/oceans/drifters /drifters.html ).

      In that post I was aiming for a "funny" moderation, yet it seems that there are some unamused moderators who think it is redundant(!), even though it was the second post! Ah well.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    3. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Informative

      The type of duck is quite specific, and it has the comapny name stamped on it. The thing about cheap plastic that that anyone can make is that there are literally thousands of variations, and the scientists are only interested in one breed. Different plastic, differnt sizes, different designs.

    4. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's the untreated sewage/industrial waste that I object to

      Do you believe in Homeopathy then?

      Seem to me if you dumped sewage or industrial waste carefully into the deep ocean, it would get diluted to the point where it was harmless before anything encountered it. Depending on the waste, it could be dumped in a way that it sinks several kilometres to the ocean floor (e.g. solid nuclear waste), or rises to the point where bacteria can break it down (sewage). Either way, the enormous dilution factor should make any that reaches the surface harmless.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by armb · · Score: 1

      >> It's the untreated sewage/industrial waste that I object to

      > Seem to me if you dumped sewage or industrial waste carefully into the deep ocean

      Seems to me that the untreated sewage/industrial waste being dumped at the moment is not being dumped "carefully into the deep ocean".

      --
      rant
    6. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      the enormous dilution factor should make any that reaches the surface harmless. What about all the ocean animals? It wasn't a retorical question, I don't know much about the effects of waste.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by whatme · · Score: 3, Informative
      There is a old phrase in the chemical and industrial sector

      Dilution is the solution to pollution.

      In fact, in some municipalities, waste into the sewer system is allowed below a certain concentration, but get above that concentration and get fined. So you can (and some do) simply add water when dumping stuff down the drain. Environmentally this makes little sense as it's the same amount of "bad stuff" going down the drain, but in the allowed case you're also "wasting" lots of water. (this ignores the issue of high concentrations being bad for the piping system of course).

    8. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by mythar · · Score: 1

      these were manufactured in china, remember? how do you know they aren't made out of untreated sewage and industrial waste?

    9. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, deep oceans are almost sterile. There's life on the surface and for some distance down. And there's life around ocean vents. But there's probably big chunks of ocean with not much in it - it is cold and dark and there is no oxygen so that literally nothing can live there. So you'd pipe your waste there and rely on dilution to make it harmless by the time it gets to places with life.

      Even if there are a few bugs, you could test the effects of what you're dumping on them before you do it, and check back regularly afterwards. You can suck up sterile seawater and pre-dilute the waste too or even pasteurise it, if you're worried about colonies of bacteria growing on the end of the pipe.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by LuNa7ic · · Score: 1

      More seriously, maybe scientists should be getting more brightly coloured floating objects and chucking them in the sea at various points. What about red for Russia (two types, one for each coast), yellow for (no I won't go there...) and various other colours for other countries.
      White for France...
      --
      *runs*
    11. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      "There is a old phrase in the chemical and industrial sector

      Dilution is the solution to pollution."

      In surgery too :-)

    12. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

      You do know that water is composed of oxygen, right?

      --
      IAALS.
    13. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Platupous · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. . . please tell me where you are going with this.

    14. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FTA - "So precious to science are they that the US firm that made them is offering a £50 bounty for finding one ."

      1) Goto shop and purchase large amounts of rubber duckies
      2) Emerse them in water and ice for a few years and so
      3) Sell them to this company for 50 pounds each
      4) Profit ???


      At least you be able to recoup $50 of your expenses.

    15. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the animals that swallow and choke or back up their digestive tracks on chemically inert plastics. Innocently floating and brightly colored objects are a lure for aquatic life as any fisherman will tell you.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    16. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do know that water is composed of oxygen, right?

      And hydrogen! Attracted to each other through quantum electrostatic forces! And unless those forces are overcome, that oxygen won't be available for deep sea dwellers to breathe! That was their point!

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    17. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and so is rust. What's your point?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sir, you are the second greatest moron I've read about on Slashdot.

      WTF do you think happens to shit put in the ocean? It DILUTES! It DILUTES so freaking great that now Tuna is full of Mercury and orcas (killer whales) are going nuts because of the DILUTED pollutants.

      The "dilution factor" works only if you have insignificant amount of pollution. Not cubic miles of shit dumped all over the place.

      Thank you, but your kind of thinking is why there is 10 TIMES as much plastic in the ocean than algae and phytoplankton.

    19. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Only the completely stupid ones. As far as I'm concerned you can pour as many chemically inert (well, Ok - relatively inert) plastic ducks as are needed

      Yeah right until they block a whale's blow hole or cause the death of a seal because the dumb animal ate the damned thing. Last time I checked fishing line and many shark nets are relatively chemically inert too but they do some damage nonetheless.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    20. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by lgw · · Score: 1

      You do realize that "cubic miles of shit" is an "insignificant amount of pollution" if diluted, right? I remember the day when one could expect a Slashdotter to do the math. Do you realize there are probably 4-5 billion tons of uranium in seawater? Do you fear the ocean will explode soon?

      The problem with dumping in the ocean is that no one bothers to dilute toxins, they just dump them, so trouble piles up where it's dumped. Dilution would work fine.

      Also, plastic is pretty inert - why does it matter how much of it is in the ocean? Does it kill a few cute animals? Does that make you sad? There's far less plastic in the ocean than uranium ...

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Karrde45 · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, there is some free oxygen diffused among the water molecules. The gills on a fish don't perform electrolysis on the water, they just filter out some of the available oxygen.

    22. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Tis true, but as has been pointed out, there is very little dissolved oxygen at those depths. So the GP's "point" that water is composed of oxygen still has no bearing.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    23. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Petersson · · Score: 1

      You do know that water is composed of oxygen, right?

      Hal_Porter was surely referring to oxygen dissolved in sea water, which is required for most of the water creatures to live.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    24. Re:How can they identify one ducky from another? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, there is some free oxygen diffused among the water molecules. The gills on a fish don't perform electrolysis on the water, they just filter out some of the available oxygen.

      This is true. And the reason they don't perform electrolysis is because they can't afford to. The energy required to electrolyse water would be more than that they could gain from respiration. You need dissolved O2 which you can extract cheaply. Then you combine it with glucose to give you CO2, H2O and energy.

      There are other reactions that life can use like the ones around black smokers and in anaerobic caves, but if you have cold dark water with no O2 and none of the chemicals required for those then there's just nothing for organisms to live on, which is why it ends up being sterile.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  3. Quack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Quack quack quack, quack quack. Quack quack quack quack quack Quake!

    1. Re:Quack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ducks!

  4. this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by satyakam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like a story tailor-made for a pixar movie. Sort of like a toy-story / finding-nemo mashup. -satyakam

    1. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by ceeam · · Score: 4, Funny

      That or Michael Moore documentary.

    2. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Funny

      That or Michael Moore documentary.

      I think you mean a duckumentary...

      (I thank you, I thank you. Don't forget to tip your waitresses, etc.)

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by Gryle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quack comedian.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    4. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but less fake.

    5. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Looks like a story tailor-made for a pixar movie. Sort of like a toy-story / finding-nemo mashup.

      Already is a story (10 rubber ducks, Eric Carle), which was based on a true story.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    6. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 5, Funny

      *ducks*

    7. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by 32771 · · Score: 1
      --
      Je me souviens.
    8. Re:this will eventually turn into a pixar movie. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I think you mean a duckumentary...

      Duck? A foie-gras goose seems more appropriate.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. ralph wiggum by thhamm · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:ralph wiggum by thebigbluecheez · · Score: 1

      Say goose you stupid freak!

      --
      I like your Macs, but I don't like your Mac users. (with apologies to Gandhi)
    2. Re:ralph wiggum by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goose you stupid freak!

  6. £50 bounty, for a duck? by tehSpork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a bunch of quacks...

    It's a pretty cool story though (shock, someone actually read TFA). I'm sure that we've learned a lot more about oceanic patterns from those plastic toys than we have from a lot of other (more expensive) methods employed in the past.

    1. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

      22,000 rubber ducks = ~3 million US dollars

      Who wants to go to an Artic Expedition, we're mining ducks....

    2. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1

      Are we to assume that they are serial numbered or can we just show up with any duck from that particular manufacturer...?

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    3. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by janestarz · · Score: 2, Funny
      TFA mainly teaches us that people won't report a bobbing float of the kind scientists use, but they do report hundreds of rubber duckies.
      Perhaps we should just teach scientists to disguise their floats as rubber ducks or equip the floats with GPS so they're not so reliant of sightings to chart the course their floats are taking.

      I foresee a whole new range of scientific devices...weather balloons shaped like alien heads (with a limited edition of Gremlin-features), rubber duck floats...

    4. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Goffee71 · · Score: 1, Funny

      This story is cute now, but the world won't be so happy when the first batch of Blue whales wash up, dead from clogged Baleen plates full of plastic ducks...

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    5. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "22,000 rubber ducks = ~3 million US dollars"

      That is so insightfull, I'm still laughing while I type!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      when the first batch of Blue whales wash up, dead from clogged Baleen plates full of plastic ducks...

            Umm, the ducks float.

            Can't remember seeing many blue whales skimming the surface for plankton.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Goffee71 · · Score: 0

      Curses, how about if they were caught in a whirlpool and sucked down into the deep where they become trapped in a layer of water with a higher salinity/density that kept them trapped where the Blue whales normally feed? Or the giant squid have been coming up and collecting them as presents for their plankton buddies Or just make it the species of surface feeding whale of your choice? I dunno, some people are never satisfied with an off the cuff joke...

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    8. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by booyabazooka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is so insightfull, I'm still laughing while I type!
      Ah, so that's what "Insightful" means. The /. moddings all make sense now...
    9. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that UV exposure from sunlight will have bleached and brittled the plastic - it will be fairly obvious that one has been at sea.

    10. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Hanners1979 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Collect them all, and win a PlayStation 3!

    11. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by geobeck · · Score: 1

      ...weather balloons shaped like alien heads...

      "Prepare for trouble..."

      Well, you'd get a lot of kids involved in science.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    12. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by edittard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Umm, the ducks float.
      Then they must be witches. Burn them!!!
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    13. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by D'Eyncourt · · Score: 1

      Wabbit season!

    14. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by redcane · · Score: 1

      It's cool, I have a strong UV light source in my garage.

    15. Re:£50 bounty, for a duck? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the serial number is 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63 Ducks with DRM

  7. 1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by fantomas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thousands washing up at 50 pounds a pop for returning them?

    1. Train ticket to West Country
    2. Beach scavenge
    3. Profit!!

    This will be more fun than when the Napoli beached off Branscombe! Easier to sneak plastic ducks off the beach than BMW motorbikes....

    1. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the "..."?

    2. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by fantomas · · Score: 1

      ah heck yeah, that's the beauty of it, no missing bit in the plan!

      umm, maybe its "getting there before everybody else in the country who's read the same newspaper and has the same idea" :-)

    3. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by aslate · · Score: 1

      Naa, wouldn't get enough to cover the train fare :p

    4. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by monk.e.boy · · Score: 1

      You think that us Cornish are going to let you emmits get in on our wrecking heritage? I don't think so.

      At fifty bone a duck, that's going to work out better than fishing. Or working in some campsite.

      monk.e.boy

    5. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by dajak · · Score: 1

      But do they bring a 20 mile drift net?

    6. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by artg · · Score: 1
    7. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Cornish are subjects of the British Crown and will dammned well do as you're told.

      Please return to your campsites and ice cream shops and await further orders.

    8. Re:1. Train ticket to West Country 2.Profit!! by turing_m · · Score: 1

      1. Make identical mould of duck.
      2. Mass produce in China.
      3. Run through a stone wash
      4. Douse with intense UV light.
      5. Profit!

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  8. This is actually interesting... by Flying+pig · · Score: 5, Interesting
    and amazing that it got a reasonable and sensible write up in the Daily Mail. Perhaps now Mr. Blair has departed the Mail will be less of a feral beast (that's a UK reference for those of you in the rest of the world, don't worry about it) and more of a newspaper.

    However, given the way the climate change deniers have been trying to rubbish oceanographers and meteorologists because of their agreement on inconvenient data, the fact that this guy predicted something as counter intuitive as the ducks traveling through a North-west passage in pack ice should give pause for thought.

    When even people like Dyson try and rubbish climatologists (presumably because he wants unrestricted space travel and they are warning that this is impossible without doing severe damage to the Earth) this sort of thing reminds us of just (1) how much these people know and (2) what a lot they still want to learn, while their opponents seem to rely on soundbites and dodgy statistics rather than science.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:This is actually interesting... by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for the post, I saw "the daily mail is reporting" and didn't even think of reading the article. It turned out to be quite interesting despite me spending the whole time reading it thinking - how are they going to make this a "Thousands of Chinese immigrants ready wash onto UK shores - Labour to blame" story

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    2. Re:This is actually interesting... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most frightening thing about the Daily Mail (well, frightening to anybody with a social conscience) is that over half their online readership is from outside the UK. Talk about giving everybody the worst possible guide of everyday British life...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:This is actually interesting... by Bertie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably all those ex-pats living in Spain and France. You know, the ones who left England because it's "full of foreigners who don't even speak the language"...

    4. Re:This is actually interesting... by Saxmachine · · Score: 1

      I applaud your efforts to raise the level of discourse with strongly documented arguments free of invective or baseless claims.

    5. Re:This is actually interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "...given the way the climate change deniers have been trying to rubbish oceanographers ..."

      You can't be a climate change denier. Noone denies that the climate changes. What people deny is that anthropic global warming has been comprehensively proven. And given the maths of people like Mann, that's a pretty reasonable position.

      The global warming scare suffers from the fact that the world has been cooling ever since 1998. So they are trying to change their title to 'climate change' which undeniably exists, but is a meaningless concept. And with you, they seem to have caught at least one moron!

      For your information, the global warming scare is now in it's last days scientifically, as large holes are being picked in all the original assertions. The papers and the politicians will probably realise this in another five years or so!

    6. Re:This is actually interesting... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The Daily Wail, the newspaper of the permanently offended middle Englander change? I don't think so. It was just as awful prior to Blair.

    7. Re:This is actually interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Never seen it before, but it definitely has the stink of a tabloid. Just look at the side "Don't miss.." section, full of celebrities and other crap that isn't really news.

    8. Re:This is actually interesting... by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sssh! We're actually exporting them; don't tell the Spanish government.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    9. Re:This is actually interesting... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Talk about giving everybody the worst possible guide of everyday British life...

      That's ok, it's not like we American's don't have anything to be embarrassed about either ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:This is actually interesting... by fedxone-v86 · · Score: 1

      Oh, you Americans! Can't you get it into your heads?
      Just because you like to embarrass yourselves doesn't mean the rest of the world must like it, too! :P

      --
      (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
    11. Re:This is actually interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American's


      Personally, I'm most embarrassed over our public school system...
    12. Re:This is actually interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your efforts to raise the level of discourse with strongly documented arguments free of invective or baseless claims.

      Not a chance of rising to your bait, sorry.

      The reign of terror by GW zealots has gone on too long and is too vicious, and life is too short to waste it on people who will accept only one possible avenue of investigation. Holes in your fantasy won't stop appearing just because you abuse them away.

      Enjoy your nest full of Yes men, there's no shortage. It won't last.

    13. Re:This is actually interesting... by Brickwall · · Score: 1

      Well, I only read the Mail because I can't get the Sunday Sport online...

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    14. Re:This is actually interesting... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      No one expects the Spanish Emigration!

      Thank you! I'm here till Thursday! Try the veal!

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    15. Re:This is actually interesting... by raddan · · Score: 1

      Mel Gibson is Australian. Fortunately, we still have Clayton Bigsby.

    16. Re:This is actually interesting... by bograt · · Score: 1

      Mel Gibson is Australian.
      From the Wikipedia article linked to by GP: "Gibson is a native-born United States citizen..."
    17. Re:This is actually interesting... by edittard · · Score: 1

      When I looked at it, it said he was a talentless Australian midget. Obviously someone vanadalised it just before you read it.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    18. Re:This is actually interesting... by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Allegedly, Paul Dacre (Daily Mail editor) is a friend of Gordon Brown (new UK Prime Minister, for those not keeping up at the back). Not sure if that has any bearing on things or not:
      http://politics.guardian.co.uk/media/story/0,,2115 307,00.html

      However, as it's a story about a bunch of foreigners trying to get to the UK, it's standard Daily Mail fare, really. These ducks are different to us - they're not even the same species!

    19. Re:This is actually interesting... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think us Aussies can probably be blamed for old Mel Gibson. :(

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    20. Re:This is actually interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's American, but spent some time in Australia, which is more than enough for Australians to claim him as theirs when they think it's to their advantage.

  9. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a native of the South-West of England I for one welcome our new faded yellow Chinese rubber duck overlords.

  10. Harper's article on the floatees by Tim · · Score: 4, Informative

    Harper's did a long article on these in the January 2007 issue. If you're a subscriber, you can go to http://harpers.org/archive/2007/01/0081345 to read it.

    Also, if you're interested in this stuff, you might want to check out Ebbesmeyer's website and newsletter about beachcombing: http://beachcombersalert.org/

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    1. Re:Harper's article on the floatees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I prefer The Register's version myself for its ransacking of thesauri, plus that's one of the best URLs I've seen in a while:
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/28/doomed_duc ks_sail_oceans_for_all_eternity

    2. Re:Harper's article on the floatees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, seriously? You think "doomed_duc ks_sail_oceans_for_all_eternity" is better than "uk-on-alert-for-plastic-duck-invasion.html"?

      THE DUCKS ARE GOING TO WAR!

    3. Re:Harper's article on the floatees by Jainith · · Score: 1

      ...ransacking of thesauri...

      You sir, deserve a cookie.

  11. Wanna bet? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wanna bet there's some collector paying more than those 50 pounds on EBay? If I found one, that's where it would end up.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Wanna bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I am willing to bet that the oceanographers don't care, so long as you tell them where you found it.

    2. Re:Wanna bet? by stevey · · Score: 1

      If there are only a few available right now they'll be expensive. But by the time hundreds/thousands are washing up on our shores the price will plummet.

      My suggestion: Start selling fakes for the next month or two ;)

    3. Re:Wanna bet? by Goffee71 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a Bournemouth resident on the South-West of England - we've got seven miles of beach and about 21 square miles of sea to scan for these buggers... So I need a hi-res, hi-zoom camera with Duck recognition software built-in... any ideas? Note - this is better than the last cargo-container wreck on our shores which washed up tonnes of dog biscuits and shampoo... Further down the coast they got BMW motorbikes falling out the surf - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/6665465.s tm lucky swines!

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    4. Re:Wanna bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. The pikey invasion of the south coast was a sight to behold. Made me proud* to be british!

      *may be a lie.

    5. Re:Wanna bet? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Most definitly. But without getting the ducky they have no way to make sure it's the right one. Personally, I think offering monetary rewards was the wrong thing. Especially since the duckies are by no means in any way unique or impossible to "forge". What would keep someone from finding out just what duckies they're looking for, then getting a ton of them for 50 quid each and claiming to find them on some unlikely place (conveniently close to where they live, of course), thus entierly devaluating the scientific findings?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Wanna bet? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      They would be pretty difficult to forge. If you RTFA, the ducks are fairly unique, because they are faded from being exposed to the environment for 15 years. They also have a brand identifier stamped on them, which they have probably ceased using in the same way, to keep the lost ducks more identifiable.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  12. Ob by Mipoti+Gusundar · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one am welcomming our glob-trotting anatid overloads. I wonder, were any of these Bombay duck's?

    --
    Will code for new sig.
    1. Re:Ob by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      I wonder, were any of these Bombay duck's?

      Silly rabbit. Didn't you read TFA? They came from China.

      Obviously, they're Peking Ducks.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    2. Re:Ob by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      ...and Bombay Duck is actually a fish: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_duck

  13. Not very comfort-giving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Cue climate-change questioning troll, but:

    When a big pile of rubber ducks floating around on the ocean can give oceanographers compelling new insights into how the earth works, and add a lot on top of modern instruments as quoted here, I am somewhat uncomfortable remaking world economic order on the basis of forecasts made on that data.

    1. Re:Not very comfort-giving by Retric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When a big pile of rubber ducks floating around on the ocean can give oceanographers compelling new insights into how the earth works, and add a lot on top of modern instruments as quoted here, I am somewhat uncomfortable remaking world economic order on the basis of forecasts made on that data.

      Thank you AC for pointing out that people who don't know what they are talking about should be ignored. Just because there are not a lot of blinking lights does not mean that you're collecting bad data. I think / feel / guess / hope / pray / have a vested interest (remaking world economic order) / etc should be ignored because they don't provide high quality quantitative data like thousands of rubber ducks in the ocean.

      PS: How would you suggest building a better system? What is a better instrument for studding ocean currents (on the surface over time) than 10,000+ floating objects dropped from a specific point? Now we could make some floats with GPS etc but most electronics are not going to survive 17 years in the ocean and people are not going to notice big rubber balls so the classic duck is basically the prefect design for such an experiment because people will notice them and report large numbers of ducks suddenly showing up. Now we might want to have more drop sites but the novelty promotes people reporting as soon as the ducks show up so increasing the number of drops lowers the quality of the data.

    2. Re:Not very comfort-giving by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Thank you AC for pointing out that people who don't know what they are talking about should be ignored. Just because there are not a lot of blinking lights does not mean that you're collecting bad data. I think / feel / guess / hope / pray / have a vested interest (remaking world economic order) / etc should be ignored because they don't provide high quality quantitative data like thousands of rubber ducks in the ocean. PS: How would you suggest building a better system? What is a better instrument for studding ocean currents (on the surface over time) than 10,000+ floating objects dropped from a specific point? Now we could make some floats with GPS etc but most electronics are not going to survive 17 years in the ocean and people are not going to notice big rubber balls so the classic duck is basically the prefect design for such an experiment because people will notice them and report large numbers of ducks suddenly showing up. Now we might want to have more drop sites but the novelty promotes people reporting as soon as the ducks show up so increasing the number of drops lowers the quality of the data.

      Did you bother to read the OP? Here's what YOU quoted from his post:

      When a big pile of rubber ducks floating around on the ocean can give oceanographers compelling new insights into how the earth works

      Where is the OP denigrating the usefullness of the duck data? In his next sentence, he says that it complements other data collected by scientists using electronic and other means. But, and I agree with him, how does new information about ocean currents support the AGW hypothesis? Did you even pause to consider that the date the ducks were dropped, and the subsequent timing of the El Nino and La Nina events might give a result this time that would be completely different if the ducks were dropped again with different timing for those events? No respectable scientist takes one result and declares "This is truth"; he knows that repetition of the effect represents proof. All he has right now is a single data point which he claims "proves" his hypothesis.

      Finally, to get back to the OP's major point, the Kyoto scam will transfer billions of dollars from the developed world to the third world (and make Al Gore rich through his CO2 credit trading firm; gee, do you think he has a vested interest in hyping AGW?). Canada has one of the coldest climates of any developed country; of course we have to use more energy than, say, Gambia, just to stay alive. Why should we send them billions of dollars because we have snow and they don't?

      And as other posters have noted, all the reductions by the western world WON'T MATTER because China, India, Malaysia, and Indonesia will spew more new CO2 into the atmosphere than our reductions will take out. Why we should sacrifice billions of dollars and millions of jobs for a futile gesture is beyond me.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    3. Re:Not very comfort-giving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as other posters have noted, all the reductions by the western world WON'T MATTER because China, India, Malaysia, and Indonesia will spew more new CO2 into the atmosphere than our reductions will take out.

      Let's see. IAMNAM, and so I don't remember my math too well but for positive values of X and Y, X-Y is less than X+Y. Did I get that right? I could be wrong about that. But, it seems, based on this hazy recollection, that reducing our emissions will be better for the climate than increasing them.

    4. Re:Not very comfort-giving by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      et's see. IAMNAM, and so I don't remember my math too well but for positive values of X and Y, X-Y is less than X+Y. Did I get that right? I could be wrong about that. But, it seems, based on this hazy recollection, that reducing our emissions will be better for the climate than increasing them.

      Oh, I agree with your math as far as emissions go. If we were just being asked to reduce our carbon footprints (e.g. Al Gore's house), I'd be all for it. But that's not what Kyoto's about; it's about sending billions of dollars from countries like Canada to 3rd world dictatorships to buy "credits". And the targets were conveniently set so as to be nearly unmeetable, especially when Canada keeps its immigration doors wide open. Tell me how you're supposed to decrease your carbon use when you add nearly 1% to your population each year. This is unlike European countries where their populations are declining.

      Personally, I've given up my car (I live just north of Toronto), and now use my bike and public transit to get around. It's less convenient, takes longer, and is not substantially cheaper, but I don't have an argument with the idea that we should all try to use a little less. I've replaced most of my bulbs with flourescents instead of incandenscents, I rarely use the BBQ anymore, and I'm trying to teach my kids to turn lights, TV's, etc., off when they leave the room. But I'll be damned if my taxes are going to up by 15% so we can send a billion dollars to Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe so he can continue his reign of terror. And I think that was the OP's point - AGW in and of itself is no reason for a sudden transfer of billions to corrupt dictatorships; there must be better ways.

      But, hey, if you want to lose your job because your company can't afford to buy credits, you go ahead.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    5. Re:Not very comfort-giving by dangitman · · Score: 1

      will notice them and report large numbers of ducks suddenly showing up

      I just love that phrase; "large numbers of ducks showing up." It is hilarious in so many contexts.

      Dinner party: "Honey, a large number of ducks has suddenly shown up. Do we have enough canapes?"
      Help Desk: "Sir, I'm afraid we can't fix your network connection right now, because the system reports a large number of ducks."
      iPhone: "Large numbers of ducks are suddenly showing up at Apple stores so they can put the phone on their bill and see if it floats.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Not very comfort-giving by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Finally, to get back to the OP's major point, the Kyoto scam will transfer billions of dollars from the developed world to the third world (and make Al Gore rich through his CO2 credit trading firm; gee, do you think he has a vested interest in hyping AGW?). Canada has one of the coldest climates of any developed country; of course we have to use more energy than, say, Gambia, just to stay alive. Why should we send them billions of dollars because we have snow and they don't?

      Hang on, why would Kyoto require you to spend billions of dollars to other countries? I think you may misunderstand how the Kyoto protocols work.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Not very comfort-giving by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But that's not what Kyoto's about; it's about sending billions of dollars from countries like Canada to 3rd world dictatorships to buy "credits".

      Why would you have to do that to meet the targets? Why not spend the money on research in your own country to develop more efficient technology? It would also cost very little to have a social campaign that discourages energy waste. There's no need to buy credits to reduce emissions.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Not very comfort-giving by Smoking_Gnu · · Score: 1

      If your more concerned about the stability of the world economy (IE your bankbook) than the stability of the oceans currents (the primary means of surface temperature regulation for the planet) then I hate to break it to you, but your missing the point. You obviously understand economics and finance so I will put it to you this way, would you sink several million dollars into a company whose products and business methods you don't fully understand? No? Then it's definately not a good idea to do the same thing with millions of tonnes of carbon, phosphates, and biological wastes into a system that not only do we not fully understand. But we all depend upon for survival and sustainance. (And if your waiting for 'perfect' numbers your deluded, we've tampered with the ecosystem to a point at which the imput variables have exceeded our ability to accurately model outcomes for. In short the models are only going to get worse and less capable of accurate predictions as the environmental instability progresses.)

  14. Rubber Ducky, you're the one by SafteyInNumbers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (From Sesame Street) Rubber Ducky, you're the one, You make bathtime lots of fun, Rubber Ducky, I'm awfully fond of you; Woo woo be doo Rubber Ducky, joy of joys, When I squeeze you, you make noise! Rubber Ducky, you're my very best friend, it's true! Doo doo doo doo, doo doo Every day when I Make my way to the tubby I find a little fella who's Cute and yellow and chubby Rub-a-dub-a-dubby! Rubber Ducky, you're so fine And I'm lucky that you're mine Rubber ducky, I'm awfully fond of you. Every day when I Make my way to the tubby I find a little fella who's Cute and yellow and chubby Rubber Ducky, you're so fine And I'm lucky that you're mine Rubber ducky, I'm awfully fond of - Rubber ducky, I'd like a whole pond of - Rubber ducky I'm awfully fond of you! Doo doo, be doo

    1. Re:Rubber Ducky, you're the one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vintage Sesame Street - Rubber Duckie

      Only on slashdot do you get modded insightful when posting song lyrics from sesame street =)

    2. Re:Rubber Ducky, you're the one by SafteyInNumbers · · Score: 1

      I Agree :)

  15. Conway, NH, USA by jbdaem · · Score: 1

    We've been racing rubber duckies here in Rubber Ducky Regatta's for a while now! Hahahhaha Love seeing something like this fluffy story applied to science! Rocking.... lemme try and link ya'll, though I am having a bit of a difficulty with my curent transmission.... ((/me adjusts his set, even though they said not to in the Outer Limits warning)) here http://www.newhampshire.com/explore-nh/nh-101.aspx #95 on the list Nice!

    1. Re:Conway, NH, USA by jbdaem · · Score: 1

      Also found a story about duck racing in vermont... July 27, 2002 - Barre VT FF Duckie Race Fundraiser A $1,000 grand prize is being offered as Barre firefighters try to raise the money they'll need to fully restore a 130-year-old fire wagon - an 1872 Torrent - so that it can eventually be displayed in the city's new public safety building. The Barre race will be held in conjunction with this year's Homecoming Days celebration. Following the parade planned for July 27, numbered rubber ducks will be dumped into the Winooski River. If the duck you purchased with a $5 donation is the first to down a short stretch of the river you'll win the $1,000 grand prize.!!!!!!! WOOWOO Seems this is in our blood, to race ducks, up here in new england.... lLOL not quite the same as old england though.... and the cold. Heheheh

  16. Ice Drift by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    Presumably if some ducks got caught in the ice which then melted, some are still in the ice and, maybe, in 1000 years or so, someone may find a rubber duck from a newly melted iceberg.

    10-4 rubber ducky

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    1. Re:Ice Drift by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      That would assume there will still be ice in the Arctic in 1000 years...

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Ice Drift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some guy uncovers the ducks in the ice in 1000 years time.

      News headline - "Scientists discover rubber-based lifeforms in ice", then the server gets /.'d

    3. Re:Ice Drift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're about to go huntin' bear.

    4. Re:Ice Drift by Orleron · · Score: 1

      All I can think about is how much that 50 quid bounty would be after 1000 years of compounded interest.

    5. Re:Ice Drift by Smoking_Gnu · · Score: 1

      Artic ice packs dont work that way. For the ducks to be driven deeper into the ice pack we would have to be in a global cooling trend that would result in the formation of new pack ice over the top of the existing ice thus moving the ducks deeper and deeper into the ice pack. We are obviously NOT in the middle of an ice age so no chance on a ducky popping out for the year 3000.

  17. Ebb by caluml · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer - that's quite a good name for someone who works with the sea.

    1. Re:Ebb by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Pfff. He's barely trying. In the early nineties, the Detroit Lions had a quarterback called Chuck Long. Now that's doing it right. Oh, and Richard Payne from my school, who had a Saturday job on the pharmacy counter at the local branch of Boots. Every time he was about to finish his break, some wag or another would tannoy "would Dick Payne please come to the pharmacy counter"...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Ebb by Daychilde · · Score: 1

      "Ebbesmeyer - that's quite a good name for someone who works with the sea."

      I sea your point -- it's rather tidy. Oh, shun me if you will, wetter you do or don't, I don't care - you just wish you'd come up with all these bad puns. ;-)

      --
      A cheerful little bird is sitting here singing.
    3. Re:Ebb by eastlight_jim · · Score: 1

      That sounds a lot like the Nominative Determinsm coined by the New Scientist magazine. There's plenty of good examples at the wikipedia page.

    4. Re:Ebb by sqldr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whereas Otis Spunkmeyer is probably the worst name for someone who makes food..

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    5. Re:Ebb by edittard · · Score: 1

      If you were a little closer I'd spring over and give you a hard neap.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  18. Cunning plan by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

    I have a Chinese mfg make a couple thou of them. pre-bleached. Stamped "Teh First Years"

    You be seeing them on eBay soon, though, since they were also washed overboard it's not entirely clear where I be pickin them up yet.

    1. Re:Cunning plan by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looking forward to the iDuck combined mobile phone and ducky on eBay - no-doubt someone would buy it.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  19. New Scientists take on this press release by nietsch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why in Chtlus name a link to the daily mail? I got sick from all the pictures of bikini clad babes that were supposedly famous (oh! she broke her leg while doing house chores) FCS dress up or take it all off (&make that porn movie)....

    So here is the link to a more sensible website:
    http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn1216 8-uk-on-alert-for-plastic-duck-invasion.html

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:New Scientists take on this press release by strider44 · · Score: 1

      The irony being that the "more sensible website" has a less informative, more sensationalist and not as well written or as clear version of what's in the daily mail.

    2. Re:New Scientists take on this press release by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why in Chtlus name a link to the daily mail? I got sick from all the pictures of bikini clad babes that were supposedly famous (oh! she broke her leg while doing house chores) FCS dress up or take it all off (&make that porn movie)....

      So here is the link to a more sensible website:
      http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn1216 8-uk-on-alert-for-plastic-duck-invasion.html [newscientist.com] Jeff Foxworthy voice...

      You might be a paleneck if:

      You complain about pics of scantily-clad babes distracting you from the article about frozen rubber duckies.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:New Scientists take on this press release by uglydog · · Score: 0

      I don't see the bikini clad women. Please post the original link you used. Thank you muchly.

  20. Old News by Suit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nike got there first with shoes that had serial numbers to allow tracking across the globe.

    In late May of 1990, the container vessel Hansa Carrier encountered a severe storm in the north Pacific Ocean (~48N, 161W) on its passage from Korea to the United States. During the storm, a large wave washed twenty-one shipping containers overboard. Five of these 20-metre containers held a shipment of approximately 80,000 Nike shoes ranging from children's shoes to large hiking boots. It has been estimated that four of the five containers opened into the stormy waters, releasing over 60,000 shoes into the north Pacific Ocean.

    --
    Life is just a bowl of All Bran - Small Faces
  21. As an inhabitant of South West England by Flying+pig · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can't help thinking that they can't be any worse than our local District Council. The ducks are mostly going in the same direction, and not spending all their time in in-fighting. What's more, they've spent the last 15 years doing useful scientific research instead of allowing unrestricted development in towns and blocking anything that might cause a rich NIMBY from London to have to look at a house belonging to someone else.

    Yes, replacing the Council with faded yellow Chinese rubber ducks might actually be an improvement.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:As an inhabitant of South West England by zoefff · · Score: 1

      The ducks are mostly going in the same direction got you there: you, my chap, didn't read TFA, because then you would know the ducks split. 10K to the northern hemisphere, 19K to the southern one.
    2. Re:As an inhabitant of South West England by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what you mean. Where the FUCK is Bristol's underground/light rail/tram system?

      This is meant to be the 21st century after all...

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Face it, china/india are the problems... by cheekyboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All the technology and cleanup and reductions in the world will do ZERO good because the whole of china + india and asia (with their wreckless stupid forest burning)
    will out do 10 fold all the reductions the west does.

    If they are that dumb, then let them suffer with 90% cancer rates and dead agriculture farms polluted to death. China doesnt get it.
    Its not about being nice and green for no reason, its about not destroying your only source of human lively hood.

    What good is it to make $5000 billion in profits when in 30 years 90% of the population has cancer of lungs and poisoned water that costs
    more than petrol. Or does china want to kill 900 million people in one go? cheaporgansbay.com ?

    100 rockets a day is nothing compared to 5000 coal plants in china.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  24. OB: sesame street by chooks · · Score: 1

    Rubber ducky, you're the one
    That makes oceanography so much fun....

    This message brought to you by the number i.

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  25. Science? by archeopterix · · Score: 1

    Sounds like quackery to me.

  26. Just imagine by ardor · · Score: 1

    Obviously, those ducks were hit hard by sea storms etc. in the past. So maybe some got deformed and their shadow resembles Elvis! Imagine the tons of money you could get in Ebay with such a duck!

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:Just imagine by qzulla · · Score: 1

      My bet is on the virgin Mary.

      qz

  27. Now, another view.... by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am somewhat uncomfortable remaking world economic order on the basis of forecasts made on that data.


    Or, let's put the question in another perspective : Given the fact that we aren't perfectly sure how to predict climate and that rubber duckies still have something to teach us, will you take the risk to continue dumping into the atmosphere massive amount of CO2 - that wasn't there before in a recent time-scale ?
    Are you ready to gamble that we won't encounter any problem ?
    Isn't it best to decide that, because we can't be 100% sure, let's be on the safe side and avoid introducing perturbation in a model that we don't fully understand.

    Remaking world economy on unsure data may seem unreasonable to you.
    Avoiding to introduce perturbation in the climate that we may not perfectly understand seem a perfectly reasonable decision. If you don't understand it, don't touch it.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Now, another view.... by ozphx · · Score: 1

      And now for something completely different:

      Instead of tip-toeing around like a bunch of fairys trying on temporary hippy schemes like solar and wind, we could get off our asses, burn a few billion tonnes of coal to get something truely sustainable like fusion in a hurry.

      Then when we've fixed our energy needs we can patch up the damn environment (if its not sorting itself out).

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  28. but no halfnaked ladies by nietsch · · Score: 1

    that trigger my 'take it off or put something on' response.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:but no halfnaked ladies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. Funny, but when I RTFA there was not a single half-naked girl, boy, or rutabaga.
      Just how many links did you have to click to trigger that response anyway?

      As for New Scientist being a more responsible publication. Hehe. Thanks for the laugh.

  29. More like ICY duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Glaciers are made of ICE, not frost. Mod parent down, and mod me up. (This would make my life COMPLETE.)

  30. 1998 was exceptionally hot, but the trend still... by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Informative

    The global warming scare suffers from the fact that the world has been cooling ever since 1998. Take a look at this graph. . It is true that 1998 was exceptionally hot, but the trend looks increasing to me. It even looks as if 1998 wasn't a record year, with some year 200Ox being a bit hotter, though the text of the article says it is a draw within the error bars. Also, according to the article 1998 was a El Nino year, while 2005 wasn't... had it been, it would have been even warmer.

    Do you have other facts to share? ;p

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  31. MODERATORS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up. This is just tooooooooooo funny.

  32. And turned into a great childrens' story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.eric-carle.com/10LRDpage.html :)

    Great story, for kids and scientists

  33. Holling C. Holling by Chysn · · Score: 1

    In elementary school, I read a book by Holling Clancy Holling called Paddle-to-the-Sea. It's about a toy that was set free in Lake Michigan, and its adventures floating through the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence, and into the Atlantic. That story captured my imagination when I was a kid, and I can't wait to get home to tell my five-year-old son the story of these ducks.

    Oh, and in Soviet Russia, we duck the Chinese.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
  34. So this is how it ends *sniff* by Agilus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You were a great band, Journey! Who could have known that you would be mobbed and killed by thousands of rubber ducks!?!? What did you do to deserve this fate?!?

    --
    hackshop.com - My tech hobby project hub
    1. Re:So this is how it ends *sniff* by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      After the awful 2600 game, they deserve it! And track down Steve Perry in his retirement, little ducks! No fair escaping punishment by getting replaced by a sound-alike!

  35. Next up: Lava Ducks by chiph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Imagine if you could create Asbestos Ducks that you'd drop into a subduction zone to trace the earth's magma currents.

    Of course, you'd have to wait a bit longer than 4 years for them to pop up at their destination...

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Next up: Lava Ducks by dargaud · · Score: 1

      It's actually the best way to get rid of unwanted radioactive waste. Won't come out until the next full geological age. Of course the greens would go apeshit over the idea of dumping containers of long life radionucleotides into the sea at some precise location (some drilling would make it safer). My, why do you ask, yes I work in nuclear physics ! It's either this or keep the containers downtown in full view of your government heads to motivate them into checking regularly for leaks.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:Next up: Lava Ducks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually the best way to get rid of unwanted radioactive waste.

      I am not sure that the people and animals living around the Golden Gate area for the next few thousand years would agree.

      http://www.sfweekly.com/2001-05-09/news/fallout/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farallon_Islands
      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3720/is_20 0207/ai_n9128555/pg_2
      http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/CA3160/
      http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/farallon/radwaste.html

      As a slap in the face to environmentalists, Bush designated the nuclear waste dump as a marine sanctuary, ensuring that there was highly restrictive blanket of laws http://farallones.noaa.gov/manage/regulations.html regarding access to and use of the waters in and around the nuclear waste in order to prevent people from researching how badly all the radioactive materials are leaking and contaminating the water, sea bed and sea life in the area while at the same time pretending to do something pro-environment - the joke is on us. http://farallones.noaa.gov/manage/sac.html

    3. Re:Next up: Lava Ducks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I was addressing the general dumping "into the sea" statements and the dilution discussion in the earlier part of the comments, not the idea of injecting waste directly into a subduction zone (if that were somehow possible - 55 gallon drums would burst from pressure long before they got down that far)

  36. Taking a blind dump? by Gription · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And even if it was "carefully" dumped the problem is that we don't stop after getting it nice and diluted. We keep dumping a large quantity of carefully diluted pollutants into an extremely low energy ecosystem. In addition of sources of energy into a low energy ecosystem causes an extreme change in that ecosystem.

    Oh, and if you 'carefully dilute' something into the ocean by what process do you propose that you keep it from becoming undiluted? Life forms are the most efficient way to aggregate dilute substances.

    Actually this is one of the dumbest, "If I can't see anything it must not be happening" suggestions I have ever heard.
    THINK! Did it work for landfills? 'But we did such a good job of hiding it under the dirt and I can't see it there!' (Of course my well is contaminated now and I have to pipe water in...)

  37. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

    So precious to science are they

    Is Yoda writing slashdot article summaries now?
    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No- Smeagel/Gollum is.

    2. Re:hmm by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Is Yoda writing slashdot article summaries now?

      No. Yoda would say "Precious to science, they are."

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  38. Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Untreated sewage (as long as it's just that, and doesn't contain non-biologically-generated crap...) is NOT bad for the environment.

    It may create local conditions that are unpleasant or even unhealthy for humans, but that's not the same as "bad for the environment". Lots of things that are perfectly natural are unpleasant or even downright deadly, and the presence of mass of fecal matter is no exception.

    Where do you think all the fish in the sea go to shit? Ever wonder how lions find that herd of millions of wildebeests and zebras?

    1. Re:Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q. Where do you think all the fish in the sea go to shit?

      A. The water closet!

    2. Re:Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure how this got modded 'insightful'

      Consider the difference between the amount of excretia generated by even the largest shoal of fish (or even Moby Dick) and the amount generated by a human population centre of any size, lets say a city of 100,000+, of which there are many around the coasts of the world.
      Add to that the fact that the shoal of fish, and especially Moby Dick, will be mobile and deposit the excretia over a significant area whereas sewage outlet pipes aren't particularly known for their mobility.

      It's the sheer concentration involved with urban human population which makes simply dumping the stuff at sea bad for the environment because it seriously disturbs the balance.

      Otherwise, by a similar argument, we might as well be dumping our sewage in the street as they used to; after all, all other animals shit where they stand.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    3. Re:Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by aukset · · Score: 1

      Complete rubbish.

      Sewage promotes growth of algal blooms, which deplete the water of its oxygen supply, which kills marine life.

      --
      No sig now
    4. Re:Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Did I miss the memo? Has slashdot suddenly transitioned to british?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Moby Dick doesn't have an outhouse by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That depends on what you mean by "good for the environment". If "good for the environment" means "less impact from human beings", dumping human waste into the water isn't good for the environment. If "good for the environment" means "making the environment better inhabitable by human beings", dumping untreated human waste in the water isn't good for the environment. I'm sure someone (algae?) will benefit from having human waste dumped into the sea, though. "Good for the environment" is kind of a vague and meaningless term by itself.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  39. Re:Convoy by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    A Country and Western number called "The Long Lonely Road".

    First Line:

    It's a long lonely road
    In the lifetime of a trucker

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  40. BASIC Strikes Again! by WED+Fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I've just come up with a new money making scheme!
    1) Goto shop

    Wow, old habits die hard. GOTO? How about:
    10 LET STEP1$ = "Go to shop and purchase large amounts of rubber duckies
    20 LET STEP2$ = "Emerse them in water and ice for a few years and so"
    30 LET STEP3$ = "Sell them to this company for 50 pounds each"
    40 GOTO 1000
    1000 REM Profit Routine
    1010 ...

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  41. Frozen? Mile a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were only doing a mile a day in the pack ice, how come they're out already?

  42. Google Earth/Maps by ehicks727 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You'd think you could spot tens of thousands of brightly colored rubber ducks on Google Earth/Maps, ya think? Anyone have links?

  43. Evil Bert pushed them overboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. New Business: making plasic animals for scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why oceanographers did not think of this before? Using toys on purpose as floats in order to draw attention? Because they are boring people without business experience! Anyway this can be the start of a new business.

  45. It's a threat! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Those Rubber ducks could have carried a payload! This was just a drill to test the possibility of using those cute tiny rubber ducks against us!

    Tinfoil you say? Hey, the Japanese tried that before...

  46. Duff Beer by astra05 · · Score: 1

    Actually, one of the local Microbrews by me, here in Kalamazoo, makes a microbrew called "Duff". It is an amber ale, which imo tastes fairly well. Bilbo's Pizza makes the beer.

    --
    Live Free
    1. Re:Duff Beer by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wrong thread?

      We're in duck mode here.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Duff Beer by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      Too bad their beer sucks. Pizza is good, though.

      Wait, Bell's has crappy food but good beer. I smell a Homer'esque scheme cooking, twer I to still live in the zoo.

  47. Sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Sony has anything to do with these ducks...

    Can we expect an interview with Phil Harrison anytime soon?

    (lol'd at the captcha, "stoned")

  48. BBC Radio Documentary From 2006 by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a radio documentary about them in 2006 - my page about the programme, http://www.radiolistings.co.uk/programmes/invasion _of_the_yellow_ducks.html/, has a link to the "Listen Again" where you may be able to hear it (the BBC sometimes keeps the old factual programmes available).

  49. Duckies by asCii88 · · Score: 0

    Who likes the little little duckies in the pond? I do, I do, I do A chick a quack quack

  50. Correct URL This Time by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Correct URL This Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still works here...

  51. Accidental science? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

    I don't understand. If this really has "turned out to be an invaluable source of information for studying ocean currents" then why hasn't anybody done this before?

    --
    The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    1. Re:Accidental science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's not ethical. Just like a guy who survived getting a nail in this head during a construction accident could turn out to be an invaluable source of information for neuroscience, you can't just go ahead and shoot nails in the heads of a bunch of people.

    2. Re:Accidental science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see why it is bad to shoot nails into heads just for the sake of science, but I fail to see what the harm of releasing rubber ducks into the ocean would be and if they were so harmful why weren't these ones recovered instead of simply being tracked?

    3. Re:Accidental science? by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      you can't just go ahead and shoot nails in the heads of a bunch of people.

      Bollocks! You just shouldn't announce your intentions to do so.
    4. Re:Accidental science? by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Eddie Dimsdale did. Well, to only one person, I admit that but he did deserve it.

      qz

  52. Pathetic aliens... by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    So, the Roswell aliens crashed on our little planet to study what caused its inhabitants to throw little rubber ducks in their world ocean?

  53. I did, you didn't by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    Now go away and read the article properly. The Southern duck population mostly washed up long ago. What part of "are" (present tense) and "last 15 years" do you not understand?

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  54. Oh my god its ingenious!!! by corifornia · · Score: 0

    Duck hunt 2.0!!!

    --
    crap.
  55. Ducks, frogs, turtles, and ... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    The photo shows a duck, a turtle, a frog and a fourth creature that might be a beaver or an otter. I wonder if there is any difference in the distribution of where they ended up, and what that might mean. Perhaps a difference in wind drag and water drag, or how fast the packaging disintegrated.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  56. Re:1998 was exceptionally hot, but the trend still by betterthancats · · Score: 1

    Only this. In the face of this, I agree the earth could be a on a long term (ish) warming trend, but I doubt man's role in it.

  57. Canadian Sovereignty by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    This is a subtle way the Chinese are using to undermine Canadian sovereignty by going through the Northwest Passage without our permission!

  58. Re:1998 was exceptionally hot, but the trend still by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

    Only this. In the face of this, I agree the earth could be a on a long term (ish) warming trend, but I doubt man's role in it.

    But that scale is in *thousands* of years. The global warming trends I showed you was measured in *years* . That's off by a factor of one thousand, an entire three magnitudes. In slashdot terms, it's the difference between a file of one Gb and one Tb.

    The global warming is not a "long trend", at least as these things go. The rise will perhaps be over and stabilized in 200 years, which would not even be visually distinguisable on your graph.

    The graph does show a very clear match between CO_2 and temperature. Interesting, I didn't know it was that clear cut, with the forcing slightly lagging the response, just as I'd expect. Wow.

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  59. reminds me of a Seat TV Ad by 1ini · · Score: 1

    You can see it here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJRjkWiO-ow I thought the ducks already got to England.

  60. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had mod points right now, you'd be getting them. The New Scientist is a joke. It's sad how many Slashdotters seem to take it seriously.

  61. Don't duck the grammar by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    Reading: "...After escaping out of a container fallen off a Chinese freight ship in a storm, scientists have been followed them on their fifteen year trek.", any grammar Nazi would have to ask how the scientists had got trapped in the container in the first place.

  62. Geography lessons needed? Article weirdness... by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    thousands of them would end up washed into the Arctic ice near Alaska, and then move at a mile a day, frozen in the pack ice, around their very own North-West Passage to the Atlantic.

    Huh?? Being that Canada isn't 15 miles across, at that rate it should take thousands of years for the ducks to reach the Atlantic, no?

    Another thing: The illustration shows the ducks passing down (north to south) the East Coast of North America before reversing and heading towards England across the middle of the Atlantic. Isn't that the exact opposite of the gulf stream ?

    I'm no oceanography expert, but something smells fishy about the geographic fact-checking in this article. Can anyone confirm?

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Re:Not very comfort-giving, china!! by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    I would also add that Europe and the US--yes, even the big bad US--are efficient polluters. We produce a lot of products used by the rest of the world, and we do it efficiently! The numbers are all out there--CO2 emissions, GDP, etc--you can do the comparisons yourself!

    China also produces many products, but they are not as efficient, pollution-wise. This is why they have sulfur dioxide emissions that are as high as America's were almost 40 years ago BEFORE we cut back to our current low rates. Sulfur dioxide causes those nasty little problems like acid rain which currently impacts a large number of Chinese cities and agricultural areas. And now they appear to have become the biggest CO2 polluters as well.

    Let's just consider this...by offshoring our efficient manufacturing from the US and Europe to China / 3rd world, where the end result is cheaper to buy, but much more environmentally damaging, we are directly damaging the environment. People who promote Kyoto want to make US/European companies even less competitive in manufacturing, which will no doubt force even more manufacturing to China/3rd world, are ignoring the consequences of their actions! they care for only the seen, and not the unseen..

    The thing that annoys me the most about CO2 debate is that people who obsess on it tend to ignore so many other KNOWN worse factors!

  65. Potential hoax. by dsmatthews · · Score: 1

    Given that this seems to be the only photo that of the actual toys, http://environment.newscientist.com/data/images/ns /cms/dn12168/dn12168-1_280.jpg there is a good chance that the entire story is a hoax. Show me one photo of even a small cluster of these toys in the water.

  66. Re:Geography lessons needed? Article weirdness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just failed maths and science 101 - If you'd have RTFA that you linked to properly then I'd be asking for you to resign your slashdot membership for good :-D

    Who said anything about them being frozen for 15 days? I thought it was more like 15 years.

    1 mile/day = 365 miles a year. 15 years meant we have 365x15 or nearly 5500 miles...

    An no you're not an oceanography expert - the guy in the article is though and correctly identified the gulf stream as bringing warm waters north east from the gulf of Mexico to north western Europe. Mostly the UK. Which is why it's wet and windy but not frozen in the UK like it is at a similar distance from the pole in Canada.

    True there is a current running in the opposite direction that is also part of the gulf stream - but that's cold water flowing back. However the warm water flows at the top of the ocean (where those rubber ducks will be as they float) and the cold water streams back at the bottom. This is why the gulf stream is also called the "North Atlantic Conveyor Belt" as it is like a conveyor belt and goes both ways at the same time, one at the top and another at the bottom.

  67. Pounds? by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

    ...in 2003, the first Friendly Floatees were found, frozen and then thawed out, on the eastern seaboard of the U.S. and Canada. So precious to science are they that the US firm that made them is offering a £50 bounty for finding one.'"

    Pounds? Why pounds? Give me dollars, man, dollars!