No surprise that this is a lie also. The linked article told us how they calculated it. WindBourne lied about reading it and then lied about what it said, as usual.
His links showed America was actually the worst.
Not sure which is funnier. That he didn't look at his own links, or that he actually believed America was growing faster than China.
Maybe look at the many countries that already do this instead of inventing problems to cover for your original lack of understanding.
Plenty of countries already do this.
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
WindBourne's Secret Admirer will definitely pop up again sooner rather than later. He/she/it actually thinks he's/she's/it's helping your cause by showing the kinds of kooks that you attract.
You deny constantly that American people are worse than Chinese people when it comes to CO2.
You deny that historically America is the biggest source of CO2.
You constantly play down the reality that America per person is still over twice as bad as Chinese people. You try to convince everyone that because they got a little better (except last year when you got worse) they are the good guys. They are not. They are still twice as bad as European and Chinese people, there are just less of them.
You constantly claim America should naturally produce so much CO2 because it's GDP is high.
Your one example of a lie (which you 'claimed' was a few examples) isn't even a lie.
But then you constantly claim links say what you want them to when they clearly do not.
Even here in that very post you lie yet again.
Even in 2018, we were headed in the right direction, EXCEPT for nat. gas for electricity.
Transport was your biggest emitter, it got worse again. Like it has every year since 2012. You have been shown many times, why still lie?
But then it's standard for WindBourne to lie. He does it so much, he can't help but lie even in the posts where he accuses me of lying. Here here and herefor example. Yet he still can't show one. Strange.
You have been attempting to impersonate me a fair bit recently. But the writing style is not at all similar to mine.
The only people you will convince are gullible fools. Since that seems to be the demographic you and WindBourne are targeting anyway, go right ahead. WindBourne has already been caught out using this exact same tactic before, so your credibility cant get any worse.
Just for the record, Where did I say WindBourne was a climate denier? I never did.
You will have to do your homework a bit better than that.
I said he (yes he) denies America is a big part of the problem. He lies constantly. Also, he isn't so into logic or common sense and often provides links he clearly never reads, as they usually contradict what he claims.
You see there is no need to make up more reasons to laugh about him. There are already plenty of valid ones.
Anyway, you still haven't shown a single lie.
Just to keep track, you shall now be known as WindBourne's Secret Admirer, unless you care to log in.
(Just pretend WindBourne's Secret Admirer isn't just WindBourne with a bad fake moustache.)
One of the moderators is most definitely not me.
No one would have enough mod points to mod down all you constant bullshit, it would be pointless.
Now that I've posted did the moderation undo? No. So shut the fuck up Windy with all your false accusations.
You are right, I do often call you a liar. And then show the lies. Wasn't me on that occasion though.
By the way, did you ever find a single lie of mine? Where is it?
We are also making it much easier to try out and return a Tesla, so that a test drive prior to purchase isn't needed. You can now return a car within 7 days or 1,000 miles for a full refund. Quite literally, you could buy a Tesla, drive several hundred miles for a weekend road trip with friends and then return it for free."
What a surprise, the American apologist blames China to deflect attention away from America.
Americans are so much more dirty than Chinese it's not even close.
China could literally burn twice as much coal just to spite you, and their per person CO2 would still be less than yours.
Just put it all in a big pile and set it on fire. Just for fun. They would still be cleaner than you.
You already know this of course. Just as you already know America is far far worse than just about every country in the world when it comes to CO2 pollution.
What a surprise, the American apologist blames China to deflect attention away from America.
Americans are so much more dirty than Chinese it's not even close.
China could literally burn twice as much coal just to spite you, and their per person CO2 would still be less than yours.
Just put it all in a big pile and set it on fire. Just for fun. They would still be cleaner than you.
You already know this of course. Just as you already know America is far far worse than just about every country in the world when it comes to CO2 pollution.
Making things safer for this journey at least: enough lifeboats, a hull that's welded rather than riveted, and a period of global warming that is melting all the icebergs.
Slashdot Mirror
It's the banks fault you can't control your own spending?
Starting next year, the new tesla trucks will actually drop our CO2 by 2-5% EACH YEAR.
Yes, 5000 new Tesla trucks EACH YEAR will reduce CO2 FURTHER than 500,000 new model 3s EACH YEAR.
Complete BS nonsense WindBourne.
Coal plants
BOTH America and Europe are at .25 TW running ~90-95% load. Note that this means that Europe and America can NOT increase their emissions from coal without building new plants.
Complete bullshit WindBourne. They don't run at that load and they can easily increase.
This is no different than those that blame America for China's gov choosing to build new coals plants and continue using more than 85%coal for electricity.
Complete lie backed up by nothing.
Why did china's coal production, consumption, and CO2 increase over 5% in 2017,
Easy, you lied WindBourne, it didn't.
I have said that China is building 700 coal plants. 350 of them are in china and 300 outside.
Where did the other 50 go? Plus it's BS anyway.
The only way to stop the CO2 is to have ALL NATIONS STOP ADDING COAL and back off rather quickly.
Clearly BS as American coal went down but the CO2 went up anyway.
Did you even bother to read how it was calculated?
If you had, you would know that they simply took the total energy used and divided by households and capita.
No surprise that this is a lie also. The linked article told us how they calculated it. WindBourne lied about reading it and then lied about what it said, as usual.
This is no different than when China had to reverse their 50 year lie about coal
What 50 year lie WindBourne? More BS from you.
Finally, you speak of GDP growth. Here is America Here is China Here is EU Out of all 3, America is doing the best.
His links showed America was actually the worst.
Not sure which is funnier. That he didn't look at his own links, or that he actually believed America was growing faster than China.
China consumes over 1/2 of the consumed coal on this PLANET EACH YEAR for the last 10 years.
More lies and BS. Your own link showed it hasn't been doing it for 10 years.
First off, new ICE cars will probably stop selling in about 2 more years.
LOL
nothing fair or intelligent about per capita. That is one of the WORST measures/normalization going.
Usual BS to absolve America of all wrongs, due to China being a larger country.
And WindBourne's biggest BS of all.
Calling me a liar constantly but never once showin
Are we buying from Europe, or China, specifically, Huawei?
Do you seriously not follow any news at all?
Maybe look at the many countries that already do this instead of inventing problems to cover for your original lack of understanding.
Plenty of countries already do this.
Not if you had to log in first with your own personal details before you could use the system.
You're still expected to bend over though aren't you?
firstly
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
You're a bit thick so again, CO2 remains in the atmosphere a long time
This means that once in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide can continue to affect climate for thousands of years.
So it isn't just last years CO2 emissions that are warming Canada.
This is a much more appropriate timescale
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
firstly
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
You're a bit thick so again, CO2 remains in the atmosphere a long time
This means that once in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide can continue to affect climate for thousands of years.
So it isn't just last years CO2 emissions that are warming Canada.
This is a much more appropriate timescale
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
firstly
Individual carbon dioxide molecules have a short life time of around 5 years in the atmosphere. However, when they leave the atmosphere, they're simply swapping places with carbon dioxide in the ocean. The final amount of extra CO2 that remains in the atmosphere stays there on a time scale of centuries.
You're a bit thick so again, CO2 remains in the atmosphere a long time
This means that once in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide can continue to affect climate for thousands of years.
So it isn't just last years CO2 emissions that are warming Canada.
This is a much more appropriate timescale
If we extend our timeline back to 1750 and total up how much CO2 each country has emitted to date, we calculate each nation’s ‘cumulative emissions’.
If we fast-forward to the accumulated totals we see today, the US and Europe dominate in terms of cumulative emissions. China’s rapid growth in emissions over the last few decades now makes it the world’s second largest cumulative emitter, although it still comes in at less than 50% of the US total.
So in fact America is responsible for over twice as much CO2 as China.
But wait it gets better.
The key drawback of measuring the total national emissions is that it takes no account of the nation's population size. China is currently the world’s largest emitter, but since it also has the largest population, all being equal we would expect this to be the case. To make a fair comparison of contributions, we have to therefore compare emissions in terms of CO2 emitted per person.
Let's just say, per person American's have been, and still are extremely bad.
Let's look here starting in 1950 to match the timescale in the summary and report. You can slide it yourself to see that the US is bright red on the map for every year and China barely breaks into the oranges. America's CO2 per person is over double China's even now. And don't forget you started at 16 tonnes when China was at less than 1.
And all of that says nothing about how laughably inaccurate your 'climate modelling' is. Blaming China because of the wind patterns LOL. This is just you not even using the correct data.
You are a complete joke on this topic WindBourne.
In America when you see a cop, you're supposed to pull your pants down.
He could have had a tiny child in his pocket.
Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children!!
Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away?
/Ripley
Even if the project was cancelled, they still need to evaluate the people who worked on it...
Because it's not the other 94% or 80%...
WindBourne's Secret Admirer will definitely pop up again sooner rather than later. He/she/it actually thinks he's/she's/it's helping your cause by showing the kinds of kooks that you attract.
You deny constantly that American people are worse than Chinese people when it comes to CO2.
You deny that historically America is the biggest source of CO2.
You constantly play down the reality that America per person is still over twice as bad as Chinese people. You try to convince everyone that because they got a little better (except last year when you got worse) they are the good guys. They are not. They are still twice as bad as European and Chinese people, there are just less of them.
You constantly claim America should naturally produce so much CO2 because it's GDP is high.
Your one example of a lie (which you 'claimed' was a few examples) isn't even a lie.
But then you constantly claim links say what you want them to when they clearly do not.
Even here in that very post you lie yet again.
Even in 2018, we were headed in the right direction, EXCEPT for nat. gas for electricity.
Transport was your biggest emitter, it got worse again. Like it has every year since 2012. You have been shown many times, why still lie?
But then it's standard for WindBourne to lie. He does it so much, he can't help but lie even in the posts where he accuses me of lying. Here here and herefor example. Yet he still can't show one. Strange.
You have been attempting to impersonate me a fair bit recently. But the writing style is not at all similar to mine.
The only people you will convince are gullible fools. Since that seems to be the demographic you and WindBourne are targeting anyway, go right ahead. WindBourne has already been caught out using this exact same tactic before, so your credibility cant get any worse.
Just for the record, Where did I say WindBourne was a climate denier? I never did.
You will have to do your homework a bit better than that.
I said he (yes he) denies America is a big part of the problem. He lies constantly. Also, he isn't so into logic or common sense and often provides links he clearly never reads, as they usually contradict what he claims.
You see there is no need to make up more reasons to laugh about him. There are already plenty of valid ones.
Anyway, you still haven't shown a single lie.
Just to keep track, you shall now be known as WindBourne's Secret Admirer, unless you care to log in.
(Just pretend WindBourne's Secret Admirer isn't just WindBourne with a bad fake moustache.)
One of the moderators is most definitely not me.
No one would have enough mod points to mod down all you constant bullshit, it would be pointless.
Now that I've posted did the moderation undo? No. So shut the fuck up Windy with all your false accusations.
You are right, I do often call you a liar. And then show the lies. Wasn't me on that occasion though.
By the way, did you ever find a single lie of mine? Where is it?
We are also making it much easier to try out and return a Tesla, so that a test drive prior to purchase isn't needed. You can now return a car within 7 days or 1,000 miles for a full refund. Quite literally, you could buy a Tesla, drive several hundred miles for a weekend road trip with friends and then return it for free."
What a surprise, the American apologist blames China to deflect attention away from America.
Americans are so much more dirty than Chinese it's not even close.
China could literally burn twice as much coal just to spite you, and their per person CO2 would still be less than yours.
Just put it all in a big pile and set it on fire. Just for fun. They would still be cleaner than you.
You already know this of course. Just as you already know America is far far worse than just about every country in the world when it comes to CO2 pollution.
What a surprise, the American apologist blames China to deflect attention away from America.
Americans are so much more dirty than Chinese it's not even close.
China could literally burn twice as much coal just to spite you, and their per person CO2 would still be less than yours.
Just put it all in a big pile and set it on fire. Just for fun. They would still be cleaner than you.
You already know this of course. Just as you already know America is far far worse than just about every country in the world when it comes to CO2 pollution.
Making things safer for this journey at least: enough lifeboats, a hull that's welded rather than riveted, and a period of global warming that is melting all the icebergs.
Do they also do your proofreading?
But if you show how easy something is, all the script kiddies will want to have a try.
And then get banned from doing any business in that country.
Hint - (They want to make lots of money in China.)
China could always do with some more land. Russian land might even be worth something when it warms up a little too.
France isn't one of the 5 eyes...