Oh I know there's a decent amount of the GOP that look a legalized weed as a revenue source, but I'd still argue that the most of the GOP is still influenced by Neo-Con drug policy that both the left an right used to champion so hard for in times past.
Marianna is still considered a scheduled 1 narcotic according to the DEA. The agreement that the DEA signed under the Obama administration is just basically an promise to not after the weed industry if they follow certain guidelines. This is an agreement that is in no way legally binding and one that can just go away whenever a future admin decides they don't want to permit it any further. And frankly I'm surprised that this president hasn't allowed himself to be pushed into that course of action by the rest of the GOP.
This thing, it's a near product. But it's a tool that could instantly become a piece of expensive 'paraphernalia' the can be seized by the feds unless someone finally un-fucks the drug scheduling system here in the US.
Fucking WHY? You take people's money and solve the occasional dispute. That's about it. In what reality does the inclusion of a union aid in this task? There is literately not a single fucking task that is performed at Kickstart that is either dangerous or dirty; which is about the only legitimate reason why you would need actual union protection.
Forming a union is in no way a magic panacea for creating a better working environment, no matter how many far left retards try to tell you otherwise.
I'll point out that no one is posting review on this movie yet, they're merely posting weather or not they want to see the movie.
And that reality really does show exactly what's wrong with sites like Comicbook.com. They're more interested in pushing a narrative than anything else.
Yeah, no kidding. And look at the level of control the propose to exert. They want to lock down 30 nautical miles around a single commercial event. And they're going to just seize property without charge within that area for an extended period. And what are they looking to find? Are they expect a fleet of Slaughterbots to show up?
I haven't bothered to watch the film since it didn't really interest me. But trademark claims have very specially limits, and unless they brand was somehow using that trademark specially then I think Chooseco is S.O.L. You might as well try to trademark a genre of music.
There is actually something to be said for good sociology research. It is how we learn about the human psychological condition. But as was illustrated in these faux studies there's too many sociological courses are are little more than breeding grounds for insane far bullshit and racially divisive activism.
No, I don't think you can due the service itself. Now if you tried to sue Epic Games... well still probably no, but there might be a at least a chance under patent law. Don't forget, someone was awarded a patent for playing with your cat with a laser pointer. See 'US5443036A - Method of exercising a cat'. Now under patent law you can do these activities on your own without fear of being sued, but given that Epic is making money by including these dances in the game the plaintive might have a case. But it's going to be slim if at all.
How about you give user's back the ability to fully control their update cycle and clearly liable those updates as beta or release? You literally did that for who knows how many years until M$ decided to take away user choice and started burning users with bad updates often enough that they started to look for ways around the new update cycle.
So you're telling me a nation that has a well documented history of being possible one of the, if not the biggest, abuser of human rights is going to tell us about the 'ethics risk' of video game. China; a nation that to this day is known to execute political prisoners and religious minorities and sell their organs on the black market is unironically going to talk about ethics?
What's the sound?It's the sound of a million pots screaming toward the kettle factory at mach speed.
Given that a large number of high profile YouTuber's have found themselves on the receiving end of serial demonitization. No matter how hard some of them try to be as 'advertiser friendly' as they can.
And perhaps more seriously though the study does specially states that the aforementioned 28% are there largely to browse porn. Which at least suggest while that remaining 72% are not there just for the porn we don't know how much of them still do use the site for it's adult content.
Ultimately I believe this is a sign of Tumblrs impending collapse, given that this entire situation stems from the fact that their administration was too technological inept to properly administer their site so they just decided to discard a large part of their user-base instead of just fixing the problem.
That's a retarded thing to say; comparing advertising to rape.
Bbuutt, that said this plan is fucking unacceptable. We pay for Hulu subscriptions specially to get away from advertising. It's bad enough that we're stuck with some level of advertising on programing that demands it be included. But now they want to double dip and try to squeeze us for even more advertising time.
And it's also the correct answer. The only reason we get technological innovation is because the need to create technology to make things better, cheaper, and more efficient. All of these piss-ant 'fight for 15' looser can all get bent.
I personally get at least two calls a day on my land line from these assholes as it is, and I was getting almost five a day during this past election season. If it wasn't for the fact I can't get any cellular service where I live I would shut the line off entirely. In terms of the former it's somewhat interesting that I hear the exact same voice even though they seem to be from entirely different companies trying to get something out of me.
And on the point of my later statement, one thing that really should be done is a change in the law to block political robocalls. Those are currently except from the FCC regulations of those. There's just no way to keep those mother fuckers from calling you if you're on a land line.
One of the best options to cutting the noise of a drone down is building larger slower fans and installing them in a ducted fans.
But of course this situation is nothing really to do about the wildlife as much as it is a bunch of concern trolls trying to shit on the drone community because of a viral video.
Give the rampant corruption shot through the Chinese nation the principle wouldn't have had that problem if he would have handed over the usual bribe to the correct local member of the party.
Honestly in a day in age when pretty much any 'ultraportable' device could easily run a full power OS why in the fuck cripple it by locking it to a stripped down version of the OS? Well obviously to fool the stupid into just accepting the idea that the only way to get applications is by buying it through a walled garden application store.
... as much as the atrocious writing in that tire fire of a movie. And their ain't much we can do to fix that, at least not for the foreseeable future.
Probably the same assholes that want to change 'STEM' to 'STEAM' with the addition of 'arts' to the STEM acronym. So basically talent-less arts majors that don't have any marketable skills.
When you read this article it doesn't say anything about this algorithm not 'liking woman'. Based on the parameters it was given it chose to rank candidates based upon the factors it was trained to look for. It's also somewhat telling how the writers of this tripe chose to specifically highlight how the algorithm chose to downgraded candidates from two all female colleges without saying why they were downgraded. As if the fact that it's an all female school is more important than the quality of the candidates that came out of the school.
At the end of the day this bullshit is more about how the media writes headlights to illicit emotional reactions instead of reporting the hows and the whys of a situation. And on that note I'd like to see someone actually start writing algorithms to to replace tech reporters so we can get ride of garbage tier activist journalism like this article.
The average consumer duck doesn't have a damn clue about how much data they leak on a daily bases. Which is why it's absolutely vital to make sure everyone you know keeps their systems absolutely locked down. And even better, bin your smart phones all together and just use a dumb phone. Failing that, don't keep your phone logged into anything at all times. I can't speak of Apple products but your average Android phone will work just fine without being logged into any services. It takes a few extra steps but you can log into whatever services you need long enough to use them or update something and just log out. There's no reason to let these big-tech parasites leach away your privacy one byte of monitizable data at a time.
Yeah, no shit. I recall this being set up during the Obama Administration, and I also remember how badly it failed due to problems integrating it into the larger national alert system.
Especially with that asshole Jeff Sessions as the AG. I didn't mind him when he was first appointed, then he started talking about all that same old Neo-Con 'drug warrior' BS about state level legalization of marijuana. And given that I highly doubt he would support rescheduling psilocybin.
DuckDuckGo is a decent enough search engine and I generally support it, but it has a few small frustrating problems with it that I'd like to see changed. First off, it's 'safe mode' content filter is on by default. This is annoying to those of us that are knowledgeable enough to realize how big of a problem cookies are and keep them disabled or filtered by default with a browser add-on. While that's not always an issue, as with any filter list you can get things filtered out erroneously. And my second companion is actually directly linked to my first one. If you do auto delete your cookies you get two pop ups for the site each time you load it. One asking if you want to add DuckDuckGo to your browser and the other suggesting you make them your star page. Neither are hardly deal breakers, but still annoying.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh I know there's a decent amount of the GOP that look a legalized weed as a revenue source, but I'd still argue that the most of the GOP is still influenced by Neo-Con drug policy that both the left an right used to champion so hard for in times past.
Marianna is still considered a scheduled 1 narcotic according to the DEA. The agreement that the DEA signed under the Obama administration is just basically an promise to not after the weed industry if they follow certain guidelines. This is an agreement that is in no way legally binding and one that can just go away whenever a future admin decides they don't want to permit it any further. And frankly I'm surprised that this president hasn't allowed himself to be pushed into that course of action by the rest of the GOP.
This thing, it's a near product. But it's a tool that could instantly become a piece of expensive 'paraphernalia' the can be seized by the feds unless someone finally un-fucks the drug scheduling system here in the US.
Fucking WHY? You take people's money and solve the occasional dispute. That's about it. In what reality does the inclusion of a union aid in this task? There is literately not a single fucking task that is performed at Kickstart that is either dangerous or dirty; which is about the only legitimate reason why you would need actual union protection.
Forming a union is in no way a magic panacea for creating a better working environment, no matter how many far left retards try to tell you otherwise.
I'll point out that no one is posting review on this movie yet, they're merely posting weather or not they want to see the movie.
And that reality really does show exactly what's wrong with sites like Comicbook.com. They're more interested in pushing a narrative than anything else.
Yeah, no kidding. And look at the level of control the propose to exert. They want to lock down 30 nautical miles around a single commercial event. And they're going to just seize property without charge within that area for an extended period. And what are they looking to find? Are they expect a fleet of Slaughterbots to show up?
I haven't bothered to watch the film since it didn't really interest me. But trademark claims have very specially limits, and unless they brand was somehow using that trademark specially then I think Chooseco is S.O.L. You might as well try to trademark a genre of music.
There is actually something to be said for good sociology research. It is how we learn about the human psychological condition. But as was illustrated in these faux studies there's too many sociological courses are are little more than breeding grounds for insane far bullshit and racially divisive activism.
No, I don't think you can due the service itself. Now if you tried to sue Epic Games... well still probably no, but there might be a at least a chance under patent law. Don't forget, someone was awarded a patent for playing with your cat with a laser pointer. See 'US5443036A - Method of exercising a cat'. Now under patent law you can do these activities on your own without fear of being sued, but given that Epic is making money by including these dances in the game the plaintive might have a case. But it's going to be slim if at all.
How about you give user's back the ability to fully control their update cycle and clearly liable those updates as beta or release? You literally did that for who knows how many years until M$ decided to take away user choice and started burning users with bad updates often enough that they started to look for ways around the new update cycle.
So you're telling me a nation that has a well documented history of being possible one of the, if not the biggest, abuser of human rights is going to tell us about the 'ethics risk' of video game. China; a nation that to this day is known to execute political prisoners and religious minorities and sell their organs on the black market is unironically going to talk about ethics?
What's the sound? It's the sound of a million pots screaming toward the kettle factory at mach speed.
Given that a large number of high profile YouTuber's have found themselves on the receiving end of serial demonitization. No matter how hard some of them try to be as 'advertiser friendly' as they can.
... are just too shy to admit it.
And perhaps more seriously though the study does specially states that the aforementioned 28% are there largely to browse porn. Which at least suggest while that remaining 72% are not there just for the porn we don't know how much of them still do use the site for it's adult content.
Ultimately I believe this is a sign of Tumblrs impending collapse, given that this entire situation stems from the fact that their administration was too technological inept to properly administer their site so they just decided to discard a large part of their user-base instead of just fixing the problem.
That's a retarded thing to say; comparing advertising to rape.
Bbuutt, that said this plan is fucking unacceptable. We pay for Hulu subscriptions specially to get away from advertising. It's bad enough that we're stuck with some level of advertising on programing that demands it be included. But now they want to double dip and try to squeeze us for even more advertising time.
And it's also the correct answer. The only reason we get technological innovation is because the need to create technology to make things better, cheaper, and more efficient. All of these piss-ant 'fight for 15' looser can all get bent.
I personally get at least two calls a day on my land line from these assholes as it is, and I was getting almost five a day during this past election season. If it wasn't for the fact I can't get any cellular service where I live I would shut the line off entirely. In terms of the former it's somewhat interesting that I hear the exact same voice even though they seem to be from entirely different companies trying to get something out of me.
And on the point of my later statement, one thing that really should be done is a change in the law to block political robocalls. Those are currently except from the FCC regulations of those. There's just no way to keep those mother fuckers from calling you if you're on a land line.
One of the best options to cutting the noise of a drone down is building larger slower fans and installing them in a ducted fans.
But of course this situation is nothing really to do about the wildlife as much as it is a bunch of concern trolls trying to shit on the drone community because of a viral video.
Give the rampant corruption shot through the Chinese nation the principle wouldn't have had that problem if he would have handed over the usual bribe to the correct local member of the party.
Honestly in a day in age when pretty much any 'ultraportable' device could easily run a full power OS why in the fuck cripple it by locking it to a stripped down version of the OS? Well obviously to fool the stupid into just accepting the idea that the only way to get applications is by buying it through a walled garden application store.
... as much as the atrocious writing in that tire fire of a movie. And their ain't much we can do to fix that, at least not for the foreseeable future.
Probably the same assholes that want to change 'STEM' to 'STEAM' with the addition of 'arts' to the STEM acronym. So basically talent-less arts majors that don't have any marketable skills.
When you read this article it doesn't say anything about this algorithm not 'liking woman'. Based on the parameters it was given it chose to rank candidates based upon the factors it was trained to look for. It's also somewhat telling how the writers of this tripe chose to specifically highlight how the algorithm chose to downgraded candidates from two all female colleges without saying why they were downgraded. As if the fact that it's an all female school is more important than the quality of the candidates that came out of the school.
At the end of the day this bullshit is more about how the media writes headlights to illicit emotional reactions instead of reporting the hows and the whys of a situation. And on that note I'd like to see someone actually start writing algorithms to to replace tech reporters so we can get ride of garbage tier activist journalism like this article.
The average consumer duck doesn't have a damn clue about how much data they leak on a daily bases. Which is why it's absolutely vital to make sure everyone you know keeps their systems absolutely locked down. And even better, bin your smart phones all together and just use a dumb phone. Failing that, don't keep your phone logged into anything at all times. I can't speak of Apple products but your average Android phone will work just fine without being logged into any services. It takes a few extra steps but you can log into whatever services you need long enough to use them or update something and just log out. There's no reason to let these big-tech parasites leach away your privacy one byte of monitizable data at a time.
Yeah, no shit. I recall this being set up during the Obama Administration, and I also remember how badly it failed due to problems integrating it into the larger national alert system.
Especially with that asshole Jeff Sessions as the AG. I didn't mind him when he was first appointed, then he started talking about all that same old Neo-Con 'drug warrior' BS about state level legalization of marijuana. And given that I highly doubt he would support rescheduling psilocybin.
DuckDuckGo is a decent enough search engine and I generally support it, but it has a few small frustrating problems with it that I'd like to see changed. First off, it's 'safe mode' content filter is on by default. This is annoying to those of us that are knowledgeable enough to realize how big of a problem cookies are and keep them disabled or filtered by default with a browser add-on. While that's not always an issue, as with any filter list you can get things filtered out erroneously. And my second companion is actually directly linked to my first one. If you do auto delete your cookies you get two pop ups for the site each time you load it. One asking if you want to add DuckDuckGo to your browser and the other suggesting you make them your star page. Neither are hardly deal breakers, but still annoying.