Slashdot Mirror

Since site appears to be slashdotted, here's a Google Cache link:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:MqO2cs2K3EUJ:sharp.sefora.org/people/presidential-candidates/john-mccain-presidential-candidate/+http://sharp.sefora.org/people/presidential-candidates/john-mccain-presidential-candidate/&hl=ru&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ua&client=firefox-a

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:3vaVqFocGkUJ:sharp.sefora.org/people/presidential-candidates/barack-obama-presidential-candidate/+http://sharp.sefora.org/people/presidential-candidates/barack-obama-presidential-candidate/&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Yeah disgrace is just about right http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:njDps1hktigJ:www.statewatch.org/news/2003/jul/analy18.pdf+US+extradition+treaty&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

If it makes you feel any better, you aren't alone. There are more losers out there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_extradition_treaties

Use the google cache.

For the example you gave I typed "cache:http://www.experts-exchange.com/Microsoft/Development/.NET/Visual_Studio_.NET_2005/Q_23409852.html" without the quotes, scrolled to the bottom of the page and hey presto. The goods ....and as proof test it for yourself

I live in georegia but i dont see rusia no where not even sound but they says theres tanks should i be worrie

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:UgWOgw-udKEJ:answers.yahoo.com/question/index%3Fqid%3D20080808091149AA3VGTk+I+live+in+georegia+but+i+dont+see+rusia+no+where+not+even+sound+but+they+says+theres+tanks+should+i+be+worrie&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

Rember v.0.3.4b Product Description: Rember is a front-end GUI to the 'memtest' command line memory testing program. This application will allow the user to select the number of test loops, as well as the amount of memory to test. This software is free, and is covered under the GNU GPL. Please read accompanying "COPYING" file for more info. damn ... they turned GPL'led software into a pill ... http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:YkUL5kuv8NIJ:www.kelleycomputing.net:16080/rember/+rember&hl=nl&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=be&client=firefox-a

They've removed the html files:
http://mediamessaging.o2.co.uk/mms2legacy/showMessage2.do?encMmsId=4CFD8D89D9731663
But not the media files:
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:da2lzIzhTUAJ:mediamessaging.o2.co.uk/mms2legacy/showMessage2.do%3FencMmsId%3D4CFD8D89D9731663+inurl:mms2legacy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=21

Looks like Gayaplex is what they call their forthcoming social networking/educational "portal": http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:6V7GNDpoU-YJ:www.gdium.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/gdium_announcement-en.pdf+Gayaplex&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

Well, since LimitNone's own website says that they are "...a leading provider of" <snip>

• Archive.org
• Google Cache

And after only 4 comments, it's already slashdotted.

Searching on Google suggests the url was probably correct. The google cache link is here

In case the image doesn't show up (google cache still loads images from origin site), here it is on imageshack

Might just be virgin messing with me but the site isn't loading well, so here's the 1 page version
and the google cache

Everywhere I look I see articles complaining about how bad everything is because well, its bad. I can hardly find any pages which give me some technical insights as to why this is all bad.

I get a strong feeling that many people are against OOXML because well, its MS' doing and as we all know MS is evil. Or would it be because they simply don't want to bother implementing OOXML support for their applications because its too much work?. Another major difference between the two; one is 600 pages, the other 6000. And once more it continues to give more comments about how stupid it was to be able and review 6000 pages in such short time.

Sure, but what about the exact technical differences?

Confused.me.uk is now down however looking at the Google mirror (taken 03-03-2008 08:40 PM) - we can see that this guy wasn't kidding!!!!!

Registered Members: 14333
Total Threads: 8729 | Total Posts: 23375
Welcome to our newest member, RatRulkyPaurl

There are currently 0 members and 3 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 558 on 06-28-2007 at 08:05 PM.

Happy belated birthday fdaaproved, newrings, skinonlin!!!!

The site is Slashdotted, so see the cached version:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Frfc.net%2Frfc3514.html

Then you'd be incorrect, this report suggest as many as 54% more laws passed per annum by Blair's government than by Thatcher.

In fact at his peak - Blair's law passing average was one every three hours.

I'm not pro any party - but anyone who has even been remotely acquainted with the UK knows how much bullshit bureaucracy there is in every facet of the public sector, one of the reasons that nothing ever gets done, that huge sums of money are wasted on reports and think tanks and because the civil service remains despite government change, nothing ever really changes.

You want to blame Thatcher then fine, but consider this - how much has Blair done to repair it?

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:FcvferlnsJAJ:www.bradblog.com/%3Fp%3D4066+site:.bradblog.com+diebold&hl=en&strip=1

Slightly leading question... but isn't non-monopolistic competition healthy?

From Wikipedia - it is estimated that 25-30% of all cigarettes smoked in the [UK] country avoid UK taxes.

From the BPI - 10% - estimated UK music piracy rate, of which Internet comprises of 5% of that 10% (yeah, thats 0.5% of the total population).

Maybe the RIAA/MPAA should move into cigarette taxation. Seriously, is 5% a major amount? Markets, Car Boot Sales & Street Vendors apparently contribute to 31% of that 10% (that's 3.1% of the total population, obviously). Why are Internet users and students being attacked the most? Easy targets?

That page isnt 404, I just accessed it, must be your connection, you can get the same page on googles cache here SciTE should do the syntax highlighting for you, I don't know about other editors.

Here: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:KUKtLm1iDokJ:kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_24+http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_24&hl=en&client=firefox-a&gl=uk&strip=1

Cache: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:-PJEtsLZfV8J:www.inter-sections.net/2007/11/13/how-to-recognise-a-good-programmer/+hire+good+progammer+site:inter-sections.net&hl=en&lr=lang_en&client=firefox-a&gl=uk&strip=1

There are a lot of misinformation spread on the lvllord patch though. The people using it often don't seem to have a good idea of what it actually does, and when it is actually mostly in effect. This should be mandatory reading before binary patching your system files...

There's a difference between "lost or stolen cards" and fraud liability.

If you have lost your card you have some liability. If you have had it stolen you need to tell the company ASAP and have very minimal libaility. IMHO.

As for citations:

The Banking Code which all UK banks are signed up to. Check out section 12.12

Admittedly this is a voluntary agreement and not backed by law, but it's a start.

The BBC say that the law states you are not liable for any fraud if you are still in posession of the card.

Can't find a relelvant law right now (and am not entirely sure what to search for), but those ought to get you started.

You mean things like these? http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6153958.html http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6211589.html http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:-TuUthMBszcJ:www.bretagne.ens-cachan.fr/pdf/mecatronique/EnergiesRenouv/Flywheel_Bernard_PCIM2003.PDF+energy+storage+centrifuge&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=11 http://www.google.com/search?q=energy+storage+centrifuge&hl=en&start=10&sa=N

Looks like their domain has expired Nov 15th, the renewed, but haven't put the site back yet. Google cache still has their real home page, not much to see there though. http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:xKBxzHjlRfYJ:tigicorp.com/index.html+tigi+dram&hl=ru&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ru&client=firefox-a

Next, Sales Director of Fortinet Co Mr Benjamin Teh explained the Fortinet Antivirus Firewall with audio visual aids. Next, Mr Benjamin Teh presented a certificate of sole official representative of Fortinet Co to Managing Director U Min Zeya Hlaing.

"Do you drive?"

No.

"People who are pro[driving] basically say it's worth to have a few innocent deaths if it means we can keep driving cars around. Do you "find this argumentation absurd, and hypocrite"?"

If there would be a viable alternative that deals with their mobility: Yes.

"If YOU were the one facing death when being innocent, would you still promote the death-penalty?

Yes."

Well, at least you would be consistent, to which I applaud you. But forgive me for being a bit skeptic until the time you would actually be in that situation. To be prepared to unjustly die for your preference for the death-penalty (instead of life-long imprisonment) seems a bit *too* martyresque. Certainly, if I were to be imprisoned unjustly and they would say: it's that, or all the criminals go free, I might be inclined to accept it...if those were truly the only conditions to choose from. If some other reasonable alternatyive would exist to choose from, however, I would choose that. It strikes me as a form of zealotry that you would prefer to keep the death penalty, even when facing an unjust death, when there is a ready available alternative, which is used in practically all the rest of the world. It makes sense to protect others even with your death if that's the only choice. It's rather fundamentalist in nature if you want to die just to be sure some real criminals are put to death too.

"As a minority, there are openings available to a black man that a white man can not even apply for. So, I'd say the black man... IF he bothers to look for a job."

Theoretical bullocks. Whatever legal openings there are, they can't fight an employer who doesn't want blacks. And if you refer to 'positive discrimination': that's an oxymoron.

"Firstly, you assume the crimes are the same when they may not actually be."

I don't assume anything. there was a paper made on this issue, and *they* said it. Ok, not 'the same' (obviously, it can never be exactly the same); but for 'similar' crimes. Whether or not they are the same, statistically speaking, that doesn't matter, unless you argue that somehow, black people always do more and worse than white people when committing a crime.

"Second, you assume there is no context. (Person A may go quietly when arrested, Person B may fight and get charged with Resisting Arrest. When they get sentenced, Person B, as more of a danger than Person A, gets a longer sentence.)"

So you assume black people and hispanics are consistently more resisting arrest, fighting, being a danger, etc. then white people? Have you anything to back that up? And is it impossible that they are being a bit harder targeted than white people *by* the police? Or do you claim there is no racism with the police neither?

"Third, you assume no history. A person with a history of other offenses will naturally get a longer sentence for 'the same crime' as a first-time offender."

As far as I can remember the codnitions were similar too.

I can't find the paper back online, but I did find this: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:X2eXQ5_-MNYJ:www.scienceblog.com/cms/blacks-who-kill-whites-are-most-likely-be-executed-13844.html+sentences+for+blacks+and+white+people&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=be

Now, regardless of all the different factors that may or may not come into play (and I do agree other factors do play a role too), your staunch refusal to acknowledge that race may, indeed, also be a factor of importance, is a bit astonishing.

I found a Google Cache copy working well enough...

The server seems to be having ... problems with the load (maybe it got cracked again?), here's Google's cache:

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:TyrHbOqUhLgJ: blog.gnist.org/article.php%3Fstory%3DHollidayCrack ing+http://blog.gnist.org/article.php%3Fstory%3DHo llidayCracking&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=fir efox-a

Looks like it got slashdotted. Fortunately, google cache still has a copy.

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:nt95XhW3psoJ: www.bonafidereviews.com/print.php%3Fid%3D224%26pag es%3D1+http://www.bonafidereviews.com/article.php% 3Fid%3D224&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk&client=firefox -a

Google had a cache:
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:B5kqltngQjcJ: thepiratebay.org/user/achim106/+http://thepirateba y.org/user/achim106/&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=saf ari

I wonder if the torrents are removed aswell or still works.

As some else has already said, the knowledge is available now. At least, allow this (quite old anyway) kids to know which precautions the must take. If any of them is intent on doing harm, they won't go here anyway (how much knowledge do you need to blow up a gas canister?).

Their server is slashdotted, here is the google cache:
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:B06ewiSE9GsJ: corp.mandriva.com/webteam/2007/06/19/we-will-not-g o-to-canossa/+we-will-not-go-to-canossa

Sorry!

If two groups are independently getting similar results in terms of potential lifetime (>10y; 600,000 cycles) and speed of charge, then we can be more hopeful IMHO.

Actually, I have uncapped 10mb service. The minimum 2mb service is still capped however.

As stated on the NTL website: (which has gone for maint since I posted earlier, but google cache is here)


What difference will I see when upgrading from 512K to 2Mb Broadband?

        * Uploads at 256 kbps
        * Nearly 35 times faster than dial up
        * Takes just 4 seconds to download 30 second (1mb) movie trailer / video
        * Takes just 20 seconds to download a 5mb full music single (mp3)
        * Takes just 1min 32secs to download 23mb software application

What difference will I see when upgrading from 2Mb to 4Mb Broadband?

        * Uploads at 384 kbps
        * Nearly 70 times faster than dialup
        * Uncapped - no usage limit
        * Takes just 2 seconds to download 30 second (1mb) movie trailer / video
        * Takes just 10 seconds to download a 5mb full music single (mp3)
        * Takes just 46 seconds to download 23mb software application
        * Free exclusive access to premium content from top internet brands with Broadband Plus

What difference will I see when upgrade from 4Mb to 10Mb Broadband?

        * Uploads at 384 kbps
        * Nearly 180 times faster than dial up
        * Uncapped - no usage limit
        * Takes just 0.8 seconds to download 30 second (1mb) movie trailer / video
        * Takes just 4 seconds to download a 5mb full music single (mp3)
        * Takes just 18.4 seconds to download 23mb software application
        * Free exclusive access to premium content from top internet brands with Broadband Plus

'Cause it did to me, when it was announced: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:G1hJ62O_NM4J: www.rachaelandtom.info/node/1369%3FPHPSESSID%3Dee1 3b39483045a55f2f217b75f26d5e4+site:rachaelandtom.i nfo+www.rachaelandtom.info/node/1369&hl=en&ct=clnk &cd=4

I thought this was interesting so I looked it up, found it on Google cache (hope that stays up since I'm not mirroring anything while at work:

Privacy Policy:
You are sending me direct contact information that is sensitive. I protect your privacy in the following ways: (1) I will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever; (2) I will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides e-mail in the regular course of business; and (3) Your information is stored behind network address translation and a software firewall.

Obviously this is only supposed to apply to the email form on his website, though, so it's more of an irony than anything else.

True, we don't have the tropical hurricanes; looking at the definitions the Beaufort scale defines a hurricane as anything above 11 Beaufort, so based on that I can tell you there have been hurricanes in The Netherlands, just not the tropical ones. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufort_scale )

Just let me state that one should most definitely not underestimate the power of the North Sea in combination with a a heavy storm during spring surge, as we have found out the hard way over the centuries. It might not be a hurricane, but it can be a huge monster just pounding on your entire countries' coastline.

The Dutch dikes all have a minimum height of 7.65 meters designed for a 1:4000 to a 1:10.000 year superstorm compared to the "the levees were designed to hold back (up to 15 feet of tidal surge)". (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/1 2/210912.shtml ) In case things go wrong, there are also plans and designated areas which will be allowed to flood in case things go wrong, trying to save important areas.

IMHO, The key issue why all of this happened is long-term thinking (or better, lack thereof) and doing ones best to be a step ahead. The state of the New Orleans levees combined with the fact that hurricanes do frequently appear in that area and not being adequately prepared is playing Russian roulette every hurricane season! "[..] New Orleans levee system should fail with an annual probability of 0.5%" Source: http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:gfgpu5QskQgJ: www.livejournal.com/users/jdthood/1178.html+new+or leans+height+of+dikes&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1 (sorry for the long url; page has been deleted so I have to use the Google cache)

Here is the original publication:
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:OmTmSoOMUqUJ: theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2006/06/introducin g-blue-pill.html+&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=1

a version of Windows XP aimed at Latin American markets asked users to select their gender between "not specified," "male" or "bitch."

I also hope everyone can see the humour of it, it's a successful prankster joke we should just laugh about and then move on shrugging it off.

For what the device is I do think it is a bit over priced. From what I was able to put together a JUNO-USB only costs about $6 USD. So as much as I want one I'll wait for the price to come down a bit or for more players to come to the market.

dirty pdf version
http://www.unigen.com/news05/pdf/05022005_juno.pdf

google html version
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:B2zMiMToiloJ: www.unigen.com/news05/pdf/05022005_juno.pdf+JUNO+U SB+usd&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

www.av3.net [which I wouldn't dare to browse

I have the distinct pleasure of informing you that no Swedish trademark and/or coypyright law is being violated, regardless of how the situation may or may not be under UK law. I would advise you to read up on Swedish trademark law, more specifically Varumarkeslag (1960:644), as this might save you a great deal of future humiliation.

I would also advise you to
a) not write the subject all in UPPERCASE, as it makes spam filters go nuts
b) not attach meaningless data from trademark registrys in PDF format and
c) stop lying.

Bluesecurity would have done better if they'd sent the opt-out requests to the companies being advertised.

"Consumers using the Blue Frog client, report their spam for analysis by our team of experts that examine these messages and verify they are indeed spam. The web sites advertised in these messages are identified and reported to the ISPs hosting them, as well as to law enforcement agencies and other organizations.

Additionally, Blue Frog clients installed on consumers' machines, automatically post opt-out requests on the sites advertised by spam, encouraging their owners to remove all addresses listed in the Do Not Intrude Registry from their mailing lists. Opt out requests are anonymous and do not reveal our customers' identifies or email addresses."

No! The URL is correct indeed. Watch the clip and check out the Google cache.

As of January 1st this year, it proudly reads:
"This page has been viewed 580 times!" :-D

Yes, fortunately. There seem to be problems with the availability of those devices, so this one has only left its traces in google's cache. They also had a DVI+HDCP to VGA converter, both were priced at around 300-500 US$. This device was built in Taiwan or China if I'm not mistaken and has been available under other brand names as well.

I think this 1->2 DVI distribution device is / was rumored to strip off the HDCP protection as well. There are at least two or three more devices that are (not openly) sold as a solution to this problem. I have a video scaler (i.e. a device that accepts SD (and in this case HD) video and outputs VGA and DVI at some fixed resolution) that is HDCP compliant, and turns off the analog output ports if a DVD player with HDCP demands it. However, due to a "bug" in the firmware one can switch them back on via the serial interface.

10 bits, 'twas 10 bits sir! Insecurity in GSM networks

Shamelessly stolen and slightly rewritten with added emphasis from jya.com (via Google Cache).

For non-technical reasons, which GSM MOU and its members refuse to disclose, the upper bounds of GSM voice privacy features was reduced by a factor of 1024. Curiously enough, this reduction of voice privacy solely benefits mobile call interceptors lacking a court authorized wire tap, since wiretaps conduced under court order can be performed at the base station or further upstream the telephony network.

Besides, Search Engines only point to content.

Are you sure?