Slashdot Mirror

found online, not vouching for its accuracy

Independent verification of FBI Anon claims

1995: Martin Indyk, Dennis Ross, Izaac Herzog, and an unidentified Israeli representative meet to discuss the possibility of Bill Clinton pardoning Marc Rich in exchange for Rich funding the PLO, a Muslim terrorist organization committed to Israel's destruction.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/p...

Qatar would buy a stake in Marc Rich's company Glencore after his death, and Qatar and Glencore would operate in concert afterwards.

2000: Marc Rich associate Michael Steinhardt controls the DLC and Progressive Policy Institute.
http://www.deepcapture.com/200...

2003: George Soros and Morton Halperin placed John Podesta as founding head of the Center for American Progress.
http://www.discoverthenetworks... https://archive.is/Gb2FV

Under Podesta's watch, unknown persons placed accused Hamas fundraiser Faiz Shakir as Vice President of the Center for American Progress and chief editor of Think Progress. In 2011 Faiz Shakir and Wajahat Ali produced the report "Fear Inc." smearing national security analysts and political activists who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood, including liberal Muslims.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fp... https://archive.is/tOxwC

Online rumors have attempted to connect the art trading of John Podesta's brother Tony Podesta with Qatari art purchases of works by Damien Hirst and Jeff Koons who have been hosted by Qatar Museums.
http://qz.com/764975/qatars-oi...

The Podesta Group lobbyied for Qatar Petroleum in 2013.
https://www.desmogblog.com/201...

2004: The Awan brothers begin employment in the US Congress and will work under Robert Wexler, Xavier Becerra, Gregory Meeks, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and others before they are exposed as a spy ring in 2017.
http://www.politico.com/story/...

2005: Unknown persons placed Emad Shahin and Juliette Kayyem in the Dubai Initiative which produced propaganda to promote the Muslim Brotherhood using the name and reputation of Harvard University.
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvar...
Emad Shahin was convincted in absentia of aiding Hamas and Iran to overthrow the Egyptian government.
http://emadshahin.com/?p=1839
https://news.vice.com/article/...
Juliette Kayyem advocated for Qatari state television network Al-Jazeera and wrote "The War On Terror Is Over" to discourage continued resistance to al-Qaeda.
https://www.boston.com/bostong...
https://www.boston.com/bostong...

2005: Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal paid Georgetown University $20 million to continue hosting John Esposito's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, which was originally founded in 1993 with a grant from PLO board member Hasib Sabagh

Here's the link to an archived copy of that pastebin

No it does not say that. You might want to look at the facts before you spout off. You might for example look at definition g here: https://archive.is/20110721192.... It does say "not limited to", but that definitely does not mean "bigger".

Wait, I'm confused. Banning Nazi's is bad?? How did that happen?

"Nazi" is the term they use to describe all opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood. Notice the pattern. The people they ban second are the atheists and nonconformists who oppose fundamentalist Islam: Milo Yiannopoulos, Sargon of Akkad, SyeTen, Dennis Prager, Bunty King, etc. These are not Nazis by any stretch of the imagination. The people they ban first are anyone who points out that there is politically motivated censorship going on. Example #1, the Gamergaters. The FBI investigated and proved that there was no harassment from that group, all they did was call out politically-motivated bullshit and censorship. They were banned everywhere just for pointing it out.

Google will also put your name on a Valley-wide blacklist and have people dig through your social media history to find something that could be considered offensive, and then have several people call your employer and his neighbours and family to say that his company employs a nazi sexual harasser and demand that you be fired. You may have heard that Google paid a quarter billion dollars toward initiatives to increase workplace diversity, Intel pledged $300 million, other corporations pledged more. This is what the money goes to.

Look into who is driving this. Someone has already done the work for you. Twitter is run by Saudis, Qataris, and a few Western useful idiots who have the multi-billion-dollar MacArthur Foundation, Ford Foundation, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation backing them. Google Ideas had people running around the Middle East helping the Muslim Brotherhood take power in Egypt and Libya before they started working with the American branch of the Muslim Brotherhood on automated tools for newspapers to moderate their comments sections. The rumor is that all of this is funded by the DHS and CIA as a "national security" program which is why Wikileaks can't do more than vaguely hint at it without breaking the law.

Changed when social justice advocates and progressives decided that "you also deserve to have the consequences of it" as a standard manifesto, and started to attack people, go after their employment, and so on. They don't believe in that statement, they only believe that "proper speech" that they deem acceptable is the limit. Otherwise you wouldn't see them cheering in support of things like this. Or things like this.

I'm sure someone will go but...the right. And yes, they sure have started doing that. They took it right from your playbook, you know the one. Rules for Radicals, hope you're enjoying them invoking rule #4: "Make them live up to their own standards."

Interesting conspiracy theory. Are you claiming that all the protesters were paid to pretend to be Nazis and nationalist and KKK members, or just the Nazis and the others were genuine nationalists and KKK members?

Who right up until November 2016, was an avowed leftist, democrat supporter, proud obama supporter, and so on.

From the SLPC link you posted, but apparently didn't read:

"Kessler himself has placed his "red-pilling" around December of 2013 when a PR executive was publicly excoriated for a tasteless Twitter joke about AIDS in Africa."

By the way, working for CNN doesn't make you a leftist.

Traditionalist Workers Party. Sounds very right-wing to me

By the way, have to actually looked at the Traditionalist Workers Party Facebook page? It seems to be full of fake news and some distinctly Nazi/nationalist looking imagery. It actually does sound very right wing to me too, now you mention it.

This same SJW death spiral is going on in the Drupal community right now. There's a bunch of self-appointed busybody BDSM police in the organization plus both a board and a committee charged with enforcing the Drupal Code of Conduct being filled with identity politics social justice baizuo types. I'll paste a recent Reddit post and a follow-up post that explains where I'm going with this:

Well, the fact that they adopted the TODO Group's "Open Code of Conduct" screams a lot about the "values" under their cranial hoods. Have a peek at the history of this document. My favorite part is this one:

Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding:

‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’
Reasonable communication of boundaries, such as “leave me alone,” “go away,” or “I’m not discussing this with you”
Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts
Communicating in a ‘tone’ you don’t find congenial
Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions


Granted, that has since been removed from the text due to the sour taste it left in the mouths of many, but the choice of this particular Code of Conduct implicates the choosers as endorsing such one-sided beliefs. I'm not even REMOTELY surprised that this kind of anti-inclusive ousting has occurred; in fact, I'd say it was only a matter of time.

The OCOC is at http://todogroup.org/opencodeofconduct/ and https://www.drupal.org/dcoc says "Edited by webchick, danigrrl, kattekrab, tvn." The Community Working Group is charged with enforcement and https://www.drupal.org/governance/community-working-group says they are: George DeMet (Chair), Adam Hill, Michael Anello, Emma Karayiannis, Jordana Fung, Rachel Lawson.

For example, if an employee expresses an opinion that non-whites are inferior, he can do so, but he can then also be fired.

Welcome to reality.

Sure. And if an an employee expresses an opinion that women are inferior, he can do so, and then also be fired. We could go on listing more hypothetical examples that did not actually happen.

If you are claiming the contrary that one of the aforementioned scenarios has actually occurred then it should be easy enough to prove by pointing out the exact text of the "Google Manifesto" where the assertion is made. The entire text is online.

Here are some spoon-fed links to make it even easier, or you can search for it on your own:

1. Original memo with citations intact (PDF)
2. Archived click-bait that had removed the citations

California is an "at will" employment state.

I was thinking the same thing even though California does have protection laws in place to prevent employers from taking action against employees over "political affiliations" until I saw the quote from his interview with the New York Times:

Before being fired, Mr. Damore said, he had submitted a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board claiming that Google’s upper management was “misrepresenting and shaming me in order to silence my complaints.”

(src: http://archive.is/IIvaq#select... )

Short of discrimination against a protected class, you can be fired for anything or nothing at all. Anti-feminists are not a protected class.

And that's the caveat, by filing that complaint, he became a protected class. Kinda like the FBI in Die Hard, "helping" Hans with the electromagnetic lock on the safe.

You ask for miracles, Theo, I give you the F.B.I.

"Scientific racism and sexism," eh? Here are four actual scientists with doctorates in relevant fields saying the author's points on the science were correct, and that he was correct in raising the issue for debate. Do you also hold these people to be advocates of "scientific racism and sexism?"

Sure do. They've even got their ideological blacklists going on to boot. Sure is pretty authoritarian over there... Especially when people are saying well, that PhD biologist seems to have gotten it right.

After the controversy swelled, Danielle Brown, Google's new vice president for diversity, integrity and governance, sent a statement to staff condemning Damore's views and reaffirmed the company's stance on diversity. In internal discussion boards, multiple employees said they supported firing the author, and some said they would not choose to work with him, according to postings viewed by Bloomberg News.

Looks like Google decided to help Damore make his case by reinforcing their bias against differing opinion. Science also supports (mirror) his conclusions.

Quoting from this on the SJW community takeover formula:

I've actually been following that case pretty closely. It's interesting because the person that complained (CoralineAda) is also the originator for the code of conduct they eventually merged in (http://contributor-covenant.org/).
To me it very much looks like.

1) start shit over UNRELATED nothing
https://twitter.com/krainboltgreene/status/611569515315507200

2) step in with a solution
https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/942#issuecomment-113227261

3) strong arm & shame project into accepting you CoC
https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/611595849416577024
https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/611635597145305089

3a) call reinforcements
https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/611574385028149248
https://twitter.com/compay/status/611616476685041664

4) update CoC to include whatever you want
https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/611714757318549504

5) Boot anyone that disagrees with your opinion

What a shock, all the Drupal Code of Conduct authors are women. Remember when GitHub was about to adopt the TODO Group's Open Code of Conduct that enforces a whole lot of identity politics bullshit? Well, while the most blatantly hateful anti-white anti-male anti-normie items have been cleaned out of it, Drupal's using the current version of the same godforsaken thing. We've seen this formula play out time and time again with SJW infections. Drupal is an SJW infested project with SJWs running everything. Is it any surprise that development is tertiary to micro-aggressive oppression olympics squabbling and Tumblr feminist grade virtue signalling competitions?

No. No it's not. "Social justice" is antithetical to actual work. It is a cancer. Drupal needs some serious anti-feminazi chemo.

While we're remembering "retarded" hurtful word shit, let's also revisit the time GitHub blew away a project for using the word "retard." The GitHub code of conduct drama shitstorm is eye-opening reading while we're looking back at things.

I believe in the iDubbbz position on hurtful words and slurs: either all of it is okay or none of it is.

What a shock, all the Drupal Code of Conduct authors are women. Remember when GitHub was about to adopt the TODO Group's Open Code of Conduct that enforces a whole lot of identity politics bullshit? Well, while the most blatantly hateful anti-white anti-male anti-normie items have been cleaned out of it, Drupal's using the current version of the same godforsaken thing. We've seen this formula play out time and time again with SJW infections. Drupal is an SJW infested project with SJWs running everything. Is it any surprise that development is tertiary to micro-aggressive oppression olympics squabbling and Tumblr feminist grade virtue signalling competitions?

No. No it's not. "Social justice" is antithetical to actual work. It is a cancer. Drupal needs some serious anti-feminazi chemo.

While we're remembering "retarded" hurtful word shit, let's also revisit the time GitHub blew away a project for using the word "retard." The GitHub code of conduct drama shitstorm is eye-opening reading while we're looking back at things.

I believe in the iDubbbz position on hurtful words and slurs: either all of it is okay or none of it is.

sounds just like a troll justifying trolling...

abuse is abuse

Sure let's go with that. Going by your own post, the above is harassment. Please send victimbux to email address next to UID.

But let's roll with some examples: Kotaku defends why they incited harassment against nintendo. Leftwing journo say's they're being harassed after lying and sicing antifa on other journalists. One of the "big name" people who claimed Gamergate=harassment engaging in harassment. Her organization engaging in targeted harassment, media gives no shits because it doesn't fit the narrative. People directly linked to her organization engage in doxing and harassment. Just remember it's okay when one ideology does it, but only one. Also remember existing is harassment. If you want more examples, try Tim Pool.

Unless someone has silently edited either the Slashdot article or the Engaget article since you posted that, your statement is completely false. Nowhere on the version of the article that I read does it mention non-public data. At most, it talks about Louisiana refusing by saying they'll have to buy the publicly-available data.

But perhaps you've read the many other articles that did say that and you got confused, which is perfectly understandable. In that case, please try reading the actual letter instead of relying on lazy journalists who don't bother to cite their sources:

"I am requesting that you provide to the Comission the publicly available voter roll data" (emphasis added).

So no, neither the Slashdot summary nor the article linked here says that and it wouldn't be true even if they did say that. And any source saying that should give you a copy of the letter to verify it for yourself because if they do not, they are completely unreliable rumor mongers. If they bothered to cite reliable sources, they wouldn't have this sort of problem.

CNN coerced him to apologize by threatening to dox him, and now is claiming that he called them to apologize first. Check the timestamps and archive links here.

Which has caused a whole big pile of new anti-CNN memes. My favorites are the ISIS apology video ones. example here. And another. Also, this guy showed up. Even the theater in the park got involved.

Looks like pretty much everyone is now piling on. Here is Julian Assange, Donald Trump Jr., the Washington Times.

It is pretty much the only topic now on The_Donald and has numerous threads on /pol/ (warning, NSFL). Front and center on Breitbart News and Drudge.

Oh, and the guy's identity is pretty much out there already, making their threat moot.

Hey, you at least acknowledged that the Quebec attack happened! That puts you one ahead of Trump.

The real question is, why should Trump acknowledge it? The guy liked him because of a pro-nationalist stance that's it. But let's compare that to someone like Jessee Benn. You know about them right? They're a self-proclaimed Hillary supporter, who wrote for the Huffington Post and wrote an article calling for the murder of Trump because "impeachment isn't enough" in his eyes. Hillary is going to say this is unacceptable right? The DNC? They've been pretty silent so far. Or perhaps someone would like to argue that this type of stuff isn't going to do anyone any good.

You can stop whenever you want. Most people already know that your version of proof only comes from cites that you personally sanction.

But just so you're happy, I hope you heard that can slap on your white armor and defend Zoe Quinn again as she's off harassing a game developer for having the wrong ideas. So to sum it up she's trying to make vicitimbux again. And it's your turn to be her personal hero. I just wanted to make it easy for you to white knight for her.

You can stop whenever you want. Most people already know that your version of proof only comes from cites that you personally sanction.

But just so you're happy, I hope you heard that can slap on your white armor and defend Zoe Quinn again as she's off harassing a game developer for having the wrong ideas. So to sum it up she's trying to make vicitimbux again. And it's your turn to be her personal hero. I just wanted to make it easy for you to white knight for her.

Your tribalism is showing. And it's really messing with your perception.

No, my tribalism isn't showing. This has been a purely left-wing thing, do you think groups like antifa and BAMN are right-wing? There are more members in those two groups in the US and Canada, then there actual KKK members. And the number of self-proclaimed KKK members is under 5000, some official crime stats put it under 2500. There are more BAMN members violently active in the state of California.

You had to go that far to find an example (and a made-up one at that)? Should tell you something about the strength of your case.

Yes, very made up so made up in fact that the party admit it happened. Just like Salon's so many pro-pedophile articles. Or the NYT which has several as well. Then there's groups like PIE(UK) which were heavily involved in politics in the 1980's trying to legalize it, including with the British Labour Party. And the famous one in north america of course is NAMBLA, and several of their splinter groups. One was very big in the Toronto politics scene and tried to legislate gay bath houses for underage boys and men.

Sound advice. You should try it.

Looks like I already, maybe you should simply stop reading CNN and WAPO.

Your tribalism is showing. And it's really messing with your perception.

No, my tribalism isn't showing. This has been a purely left-wing thing, do you think groups like antifa and BAMN are right-wing? There are more members in those two groups in the US and Canada, then there actual KKK members. And the number of self-proclaimed KKK members is under 5000, some official crime stats put it under 2500. There are more BAMN members violently active in the state of California.

You had to go that far to find an example (and a made-up one at that)? Should tell you something about the strength of your case.

Yes, very made up so made up in fact that the party admit it happened. Just like Salon's so many pro-pedophile articles. Or the NYT which has several as well. Then there's groups like PIE(UK) which were heavily involved in politics in the 1980's trying to legalize it, including with the British Labour Party. And the famous one in north america of course is NAMBLA, and several of their splinter groups. One was very big in the Toronto politics scene and tried to legislate gay bath houses for underage boys and men.

Sound advice. You should try it.

Looks like I already, maybe you should simply stop reading CNN and WAPO.

Your tribalism is showing. And it's really messing with your perception.

No, my tribalism isn't showing. This has been a purely left-wing thing, do you think groups like antifa and BAMN are right-wing? There are more members in those two groups in the US and Canada, then there actual KKK members. And the number of self-proclaimed KKK members is under 5000, some official crime stats put it under 2500. There are more BAMN members violently active in the state of California.

You had to go that far to find an example (and a made-up one at that)? Should tell you something about the strength of your case.

Yes, very made up so made up in fact that the party admit it happened. Just like Salon's so many pro-pedophile articles. Or the NYT which has several as well. Then there's groups like PIE(UK) which were heavily involved in politics in the 1980's trying to legalize it, including with the British Labour Party. And the famous one in north america of course is NAMBLA, and several of their splinter groups. One was very big in the Toronto politics scene and tried to legislate gay bath houses for underage boys and men.

Sound advice. You should try it.

Looks like I already, maybe you should simply stop reading CNN and WAPO.

Your tribalism is showing. And it's really messing with your perception.

No, my tribalism isn't showing. This has been a purely left-wing thing, do you think groups like antifa and BAMN are right-wing? There are more members in those two groups in the US and Canada, then there actual KKK members. And the number of self-proclaimed KKK members is under 5000, some official crime stats put it under 2500. There are more BAMN members violently active in the state of California.

You had to go that far to find an example (and a made-up one at that)? Should tell you something about the strength of your case.

Yes, very made up so made up in fact that the party admit it happened. Just like Salon's so many pro-pedophile articles. Or the NYT which has several as well. Then there's groups like PIE(UK) which were heavily involved in politics in the 1980's trying to legalize it, including with the British Labour Party. And the famous one in north america of course is NAMBLA, and several of their splinter groups. One was very big in the Toronto politics scene and tried to legislate gay bath houses for underage boys and men.

Sound advice. You should try it.

Looks like I already, maybe you should simply stop reading CNN and WAPO.

Your tribalism is showing. And it's really messing with your perception.

No, my tribalism isn't showing. This has been a purely left-wing thing, do you think groups like antifa and BAMN are right-wing? There are more members in those two groups in the US and Canada, then there actual KKK members. And the number of self-proclaimed KKK members is under 5000, some official crime stats put it under 2500. There are more BAMN members violently active in the state of California.

You had to go that far to find an example (and a made-up one at that)? Should tell you something about the strength of your case.

Yes, very made up so made up in fact that the party admit it happened. Just like Salon's so many pro-pedophile articles. Or the NYT which has several as well. Then there's groups like PIE(UK) which were heavily involved in politics in the 1980's trying to legalize it, including with the British Labour Party. And the famous one in north america of course is NAMBLA, and several of their splinter groups. One was very big in the Toronto politics scene and tried to legislate gay bath houses for underage boys and men.

Sound advice. You should try it.

Looks like I already, maybe you should simply stop reading CNN and WAPO.

http://archive.is/9UTpW

> Has it been? Citations?

This is one of those non-denial denials. They use the statement to sow doubt about all of the documents, while leaving themselves an out when any docs are later verified. The last time someone claimed that, it was Donna Brazille. My past comments go into great detail, down to posting the DKIM keys and how to obtain them, as to why her statement could be proven mathematically false with a key from Hillary's own DNS server. Given that this confirms there are real documents out there, the onus should be put on the deniers to identify which items are fake.

It's fascinating how the media is only now catching up to this. It's also fascinating that nobody has bothered to show people where they might be obtained: http://archive.is/eQtrm

Archive link to the article. It's not explicitly stated, and there are so few details it's hard to make heads or tails of the case.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

The Propornot list was a list of doubters. Sites which would not tow the propaganda line, on war, on the banks, on the economy, on the election. These are the sites which the political class has been scheming to proscribe since the election. I would hope that people can put aside their political preferences in that election long enough to acknowledge that it was a shocking defeat for the Media and the increasingly corrupt political establishment. Regardless of your opinions on him, someone the political class did not want got in, and they are making moves and exerting political pressure -- usually through their lapdogs in the media-- to prevent ANY such repeat occurrence.

Gamergate figured it out.

One of the things we found out about al-Qaeda after 9/11 was that they had tons of money, easily tens of billions in liquid capital. They wanted to protect their assets before the attack so they bought up all of the blood diamonds in West Africa. Western money launderers happily took the commissions to hide their assets, and they kept quiet because it would implicate themselves. We never found the money. If you remember the BCCI scandal from the '80s, they were some of the exact same people funding al-Qaeda through the '90s.

Now in the 2010s we have this same network of billionaire radicals (and their radical kids) who want to destroy Western civilization but they are smarter about it, so they put their money into bribery and PR. They paid off Harvard, Georgetown, the Brookings Institute, Atlantic Council, and a bunch of other universities and think tanks to host their people as academics. AQ then runs a message through the think tanks and pays the big PR companies that lobby national policymakers to promote their message as expert consensus. One of the NATO countries adopts it and begins recruiting NATO allies to enforce a policy that benefits AQ. The biggest of these merc PR companies is the International Crisis Group. The next biggest is SumOfUs which controls the Democratic Party through its subsidiaries GLAAD, MoveOn, and Color of Change, and seems to have allied with al-Qaeda around the time of the Benghazi incident when Hillary Clinton was shipping them arms while insisting that they weren't really al-Qaeda. Together they have convinced most Western governments to allow al-Qaeda to invade them and pay al-Qaeda to do it and redirect counter-terrorism funds and personnel to suppress any nationalists who might violently resist the takeover of their country, using all of the tools available to the secret police.

Meanwhile they have been working through the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations project to globally outlaw blasphemy which in Islam means anything that might make someone feel negatively about Islam, whether true or not. The subsidiary project Soliya runs Twitter which has been censoring people for their political views for at least three years. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Reddit, and Wikipedia are also on board. Another subsidiary project is to influence the media by sending journalists to UN-approved "experts". Those who follow the Islamist party line will be considered "real news" while those who don't are considered "right-wing" "fake news". You may have noticed that the standard used by the media to define "right-wing" no longer has anything to do with economic theory or the structure of government, but that everyone dubbed "right-wing" has a problem with Islamic fundamentalism.

You would be amazed at what can be bought by a few campaign contributions and donations to the right activist groups.

They're too busy trolling.

Making up shit without any sources was really easy, but the resulting discussion is perhaps not the most interesting one.

Those stats are compiled from 32 research papers. Newspaper article: https://archive.is/8AB3j (Google translate). This stuff is widely known, and many papers have been published.

The article linked by this story blocks its contents unless you turn off ad-blockers or agree to pay a fee.

archive.is gets past many adwalls, including whatever Wired is using. GGBlocker automatically redirects Wired links (among others) to archive.is for me whenever they pop up...you can view the archived article here ad-free, whether you have an ad blocker active or not.

Running into oil? Discoveries peaked in the 60s.

Peak oil only applied to Texas oil wells and was fallaciously extrapolated globally without due diligence. Laymen continue to regurgitate the claims today.

Peak Oil theory is based on a 1956 paper done by the late Marion King Hubbert, a Texas geologist working for Shell Oil. He argued that oil wells produced in a bell curve manner, and once their “peak” was hit, inevitable decline followed. He predicted the United States oil production would peak in 1970. A modest man, he named the production curve he invented, Hubbert’s Curve, and the peak as Hubbert’s Peak. When US oil output began to decline in around 1970 Hubbert gained a certain fame.

The only problem was, it peaked not because of resource depletion in the US fields. It “peaked” because Shell, Mobil, Texaco and the other partners of Saudi Aramco were flooding the US market with dirt cheap Middle East imports, tariff free, at prices so low California and many Texas domestic producers could not compete and were forced to shut their wells in.

Running into oil? Discoveries peaked in the 60s.

Peak oil only applied to Texas oil wells and was fallaciously extrapolated globally without due diligence. Laymen continue to regurgitate the claims today.

Peak Oil theory is based on a 1956 paper done by the late Marion King Hubbert, a Texas geologist working for Shell Oil. He argued that oil wells produced in a bell curve manner, and once their “peak” was hit, inevitable decline followed. He predicted the United States oil production would peak in 1970. A modest man, he named the production curve he invented, Hubbert’s Curve, and the peak as Hubbert’s Peak. When US oil output began to decline in around 1970 Hubbert gained a certain fame.

The only problem was, it peaked not because of resource depletion in the US fields. It “peaked” because Shell, Mobil, Texaco and the other partners of Saudi Aramco were flooding the US market with dirt cheap Middle East imports, tariff free, at prices so low California and many Texas domestic producers could not compete and were forced to shut their wells in.

The basics of AGW

The earth has been proven to be warming the closer it gets to the sun in its orbit.

AGW is not a proven condition in the real world. Selectively run experiments in isolated labs that claim AGW to be a real thing aren't legitimate for claims of open air, AGW-created global warming/climate change/[insert next scary moniker needed to continue this scam]. "Scientists" who claim the climate is changing and doing so because of AGW need to prove the climate is indeed changing in the real world and need to prove that AGW is the cause in the real world to the exclusion of all other factors.

Carbon dioxide fluctuates within a minuscule range, but it hovers at about 0.04% of the atmosphere; that does not translate to the claimed AGW "greenhouse" causes for NOAA/IPCC/HadCRUT claimed increases in global temperatures or cataclysmic weather events.

The dishonest climate change scam's scientists and sheepish laymen alike have another problem to sort out: "NOAA’s GHCN systematically eliminated 75% of the world’s stations with a clear bias towards removing higher latitude, high altitude and rural locations, all of which had a tendency to be cooler. The thermometers in a sense marched towards the tropics, the sea and to airport tarmacs." After sorting this out, they will still need to prove climate change, AGW and that climate change is caused by AGW

We are not to be ruled, especially not by arbitrary science nor its credentialed adjutants who refuse to actually exhibit their craft and the claims that are supposedly a product of that craft. Science should be transparent, repeatable, and reproducible - nothing in the climate change problem-reaction-solution scam is any of those things. Honest scientists require challenges of their findings to perfect their craft; embargoing inconvenient challenges is not science - it is totalitarianism.

The link still works fine for me but here's an archive from this afternoon.

I'm sure as heck not going to trust the trillion dollar fossil fuel industry whose entire existence is on the line.

There is no proof of any threat to the "fossil" fuel industry (that is running into oil, not out of it) seeing as how that trillion dollar "fossil" fuel industry started the central banks who control the monetary system that is "secured" by our taxes that are being spent to engineer climate change alarmism as a pretext for carbon emissions taxes that will further the banking oiligarchy's grip on the benefits of monetary manipulation. This is an insidious Hegelian dialectic problem-reaction-solution scam that will result in taxes and penalties on life itself that will dwarf the fuel industry if climate change pseudoscience is canonized in academia and blindly adopted by the [can't-be-bothered-to-validate-"expert"-research-for-themselves] laymen. NONE of the pseudoscience that would validate claims of AGW climate change is repeatable or reproducible, meaning some black box of information must exist to prove these claims but most likely does not.

I'm sure as heck not going to trust the trillion dollar fossil fuel industry whose entire existence is on the line.

There is no proof of any threat to the "fossil" fuel industry (that is running into oil, not out of it) seeing as how that trillion dollar "fossil" fuel industry started the central banks who control the monetary system that is "secured" by our taxes that are being spent to engineer climate change alarmism as a pretext for carbon emissions taxes that will further the banking oiligarchy's grip on the benefits of monetary manipulation. This is an insidious Hegelian dialectic problem-reaction-solution scam that will result in taxes and penalties on life itself that will dwarf the fuel industry if climate change pseudoscience is canonized in academia and blindly adopted by the [can't-be-bothered-to-validate-"expert"-research-for-themselves] laymen. NONE of the pseudoscience that would validate claims of AGW climate change is repeatable or reproducible, meaning some black box of information must exist to prove these claims but most likely does not.

Nobody knows, not even him.

I heard Milo say (either in an interview or at one of his tour talks) that he got his verified mark removed after he trolled Twitterville by claiming to be hired as a Social Justice Editor for Buzzfeed. Pretty hilarious, but it does put a dent in the narrative that "Milo did nothing wrong".

Of course, it's highly likely that if somebody on the left did something comparable, everybody would have had a laugh and Twitter would not have done shit.

Nobody knows, not even him.

I heard Milo say (either in an interview or at one of his tour talks) that he got his verified mark removed after he trolled Twitterville by claiming to be hired as a Social Justice Editor for Buzzfeed. Pretty hilarious, but it does put a dent in the narrative that "Milo did nothing wrong".

Of course, it's highly likely that if somebody on the left did something comparable, everybody would have had a laugh and Twitter would not have done shit.

I don't see the right trying to get BLM kicked off YouTube, or preventing them from giving speeches at colleges, etc.

So I'm supposed to care that you pretend you don't see it? I already said you don't look, so why should I care that you claim you don't see it?

Never mind that the continued attacks by the named parties on "BLM" and "anti-Trump" movements and "Planned Parenthood" exist. Not to mention the "birther" movement which continues to this day. Oh, but now they're saying Obama is running a "shadow government" as well.

I looked. I condemn violence.

Notice how you don't say you condemn right-wing violence. You won't even condemn right-wing deceits and frauds.

However, Muslims are like 1% of the American population, but their attacks our roughly on par with American militias, according to your source (counting, of course, after 9/11):

Do you want to hear about them before 9/11?

"In that time, according to New America, a Washington think tank, Islamists launched nine attacks that murdered 45, while the right-wing extremists struck 18 times, leaving 48 dead."

Which shows you why your silence on right-wing extremism is conspicuous. Oh well, at least you didn't make up a massacre in Bowling Green.

But let's bring in more of this hateful ideology! I'm sure we can ratchet up the Islamic body count in no time!

Oh yes, here you go, making your accusation that somebody is intentionally importing violence and hate? Huh, you also going to claim that somebody is for open immigration, and no border controls? That babies are being ripped from the womb, the day before birth? That the US Navy has fewer ships than any time since WW1, that the Air Force has fewer planes, that Obama is golfing and vacationing far more than any other president?

Which political party tries to convince us that Islam is a material threat?

Islam has bloody borders:

"Nevertheless, there is a problem that goes back to the very beginnings of Muslim history: From the time that the first Muslims established themselves as the rulers of Medina, Islam was a political and increasingly a legal system as well as a faith. In Medina Muhammad continued to be a prophet, but he also became the head of a state and a military leader. With the exception of Southeast Asia (where Islam was spread by traders from the the subcontinent), what we now know as the Muslim world was established by conquest. It is no accident that in traditional Muslim thought the world is divided into two spheres--the realm of Islam (dar ul-Islam) and the realm of war (dar ul-harb). Put simply, it is assumed that the border between Islamic rule and the rest of the world marks a state of war, even if periods of armistice are possible. One should be cognizant of the important fact that there are Muslim thinkers today who are reformulating the nature of Islamic law (sharia) and of Islamic war (jihad) in a much more liberal manner. But one must also recognize that there is a weighty tradition to the contrary and that a large number of Muslims, possibly the majority, does not favor these reformulations."

Oh, I can dump text too:

The Christian church has left a legacy, a world view, that permeates every aspect of Western society, both secular and religious. It is a legacy that fosters sexism, racism, the intolerance of difference, and the desecration of the natural environment. The Church, throughout much of its history, has demonstrated a disregard for human freedom, dignity, and self-determination. It has attempted to con

On News Corp platforms, Breitbart, twitter, 4chan, all sorts of places?

I don't see the right trying to get BLM kicked off YouTube, or preventing them from giving speeches at colleges, etc.

Also, case in point, here, by a user named Raenex. Who will never look at the right's actions.

I looked. I condemn violence. However, Muslims are like 1% of the American population, but their attacks our roughly on par with American militias, according to your source (counting, of course, after 9/11): "In that time, according to New America, a Washington think tank, Islamists launched nine attacks that murdered 45, while the right-wing extremists struck 18 times, leaving 48 dead."

But let's bring in more of this hateful ideology! I'm sure we can ratchet up the Islamic body count in no time!

Which political party tries to convince us that Islam is a material threat?

Islam has bloody borders:

"Nevertheless, there is a problem that goes back to the very beginnings of Muslim history: From the time that the first Muslims established themselves as the rulers of Medina, Islam was a political and increasingly a legal system as well as a faith. In Medina Muhammad continued to be a prophet, but he also became the head of a state and a military leader. With the exception of Southeast Asia (where Islam was spread by traders from the the subcontinent), what we now know as the Muslim world was established by conquest. It is no accident that in traditional Muslim thought the world is divided into two spheres--the realm of Islam (dar ul-Islam) and the realm of war (dar ul-harb). Put simply, it is assumed that the border between Islamic rule and the rest of the world marks a state of war, even if periods of armistice are possible. One should be cognizant of the important fact that there are Muslim thinkers today who are reformulating the nature of Islamic law (sharia) and of Islamic war (jihad) in a much more liberal manner. But one must also recognize that there is a weighty tradition to the contrary and that a large number of Muslims, possibly the majority, does not favor these reformulations."

And the AP doesn't like their headline anymore. http://archive.is/zBZRx#select...

When I saw the headline, my first thought was that slashdot had picked up the story about the major newspapers buying fake clicks from Chinese bots to increase their page rank and advertising revenue.

See here and here (or here).